W/Z+jets as signal and background in ATLAS

W/Z+jets as signal and background in ATLAS

Abstract

Events containing W or Z bosons with accompanying jets are important channels to test the Standard Model. These proceedings discuss W/Z+Jets production cross section measurements and their use to understand the detectors and their performances after the LHC start-up. At the same time, these processes are a major source of background to new physics searches, such as SUSY. Methods, mostly data-driven, to identify these events as signals and backgrounds to searches will be presented.

I Introduction

In this note, we examine the triggering, reconstruction and analysis of events containing a Z boson plus jets in ATLAS AtlasDetector (). We concentrate on the Z boson’s decay into electrons and muons. Comparisons of the reconstructed/corrected quantities, when possible, are made to truth-level hadron information, and also to parton-level information with parton-to-hadron corrections applied. Our primary end-result are hadron-level cross sections, similar to what we expect to have with the real ATLAS data. We present expectations/yields/systematics scaled to 1fb, an integrated luminosity that should be accumulated within the first two years of running, but we will comment on difficulties expected and analysis strategies to be adopted during the early running. We study the comparison of theory and measurement expectations for quantities suited to compare with a fixed-order NLO calculation: in this note the inclusive cross-section for Zll with at least 1 jet, 2 jets and 3 jets. Discussion of expected systematic errors is included.
W/Z+jets are not only interesting in their own right but also form a significant predicted background to many new physics channels and it will be impossible to discover, for example, a Higgs Boson or SUSY particles unless the backgrounds are well understood. Due to incomplete knowledge regarding many input variables (underlying event, parton showering, cross sections, pdfs, calibration etc) it is wise to try and measure these backgrounds from data driven methods. To detail all of these would be beyond the scope of this note and thus two particular analyses (Higgs and SUSY) are elaborated in more detail here.

Ii W/z + Jets as Signal

Experimental studies
A cross section measurement requires the reconstruction and trigger efficiencies to be known. The primary approach to measure these for W or Z lepton decay analysis in ATLAS will most likely be the data-driven ‘Tag and Probe’ method CSC () (electron trigger chapter) in Zll events. The presence of jets in the Z+jet events is expected to affect the measured efficiencies, and this will have to be taken into account.
For comparison with theory, reconstructed data have to be unfolded from the detector level to the hadron level, correcting for the reconstruction and trigger efficiencies, as well as resolution and non linearities in electron and jet reconstruction. The impact of these corrections may be seen in figure 1(right), where the dominant correction stems from the electron reconstruction. For a cross section measurement, the main detector uncertainty originates from the jet energy scale (JES), expected to start from an uncertainty at the level of 10% and converging towards 1%. A JES uncertainty of 10% would be the dominant error on the cross section (15-30%). This is at the same order as the typical differences expected between LO and NLO predictions, or between predictions from PYTHIA pythia (), ALPGEN alpgen () and MCFM MCFM ().

Figure 1: Unfolding Zee jet distribution from detector to truth level.

Theoretical studies
Cross section comparisons have been made between MCFM predictions and PYTHIA/ALPGEN (interfaced with HERWIG), where MCFM predictions have been corrected to the hadron level. The differences may be seen in figure 2(left). In general, PYTHIA is seen to predict a softer P spectrum than ALPGEN, although both agree reasonably well with MCFM predictions. The main theoretical uncertainty on a boson+jets cross section measurement has been seen to be the PDF uncertainty, which has been shown as a comparison to the JES uncertainty in figure 2(right).

Figure 2: (left) Comparisons of MCFM and generator predictions of jet multiplicity in Z. (right) Dominant uncertainties on the cross section measurement.

Iii W/z + Jets as Background

iii.1 Susy

W or Z+jets are a major background CSC () (SUSY chapter) to several SUSY search channels, many of which require leptons, jets and missing transverse energy (MET) in their event selection. It is wise to estimate these backgrounds using data driven methods. The accepted strategy in ATLAS SUSY analyses is to derive such a prediction from a control ‘SUSY free’ region and extrapolate to the signal region. W+jets production is a major background in the one lepton channel, whilst Z+jets must be considered for the no lepton channel.
The cuts for this search mode are on 4 jets and large MET: Z+jets is a major background, as may be seen in figure 3(left). It is estimated by scaling (as according to equation 1 where the c factors account for kinematical and fiducial differences) a control sample obtained by using standard Zvisible lepton event selection. Given the similar event kinematics to the neutrino sample, this may be used to estimate the MET and effective mass distributions, as may be seen in figure 3(right). The resultant dominant systematics are the variation of the renormalisation scale in ALPGEN and the soft part of the MET which isn’t taken into account when replacing neutrinos by leptons.

(1)
Figure 3: (left) Signal and background in the SUSY no lepton channel. (right) Estimated background for the SUSY no lepton channel after using Zll to estimate the Z contribution.

iii.2 Higgs

W/Z+jets are relevant for many Higgs channels, and the MSSM Higgs A/H/h channel is given as an example. The selection for this process requires two isolated muons and small MET and thus Z decaying to muons in association with jets is a background. The Z+light jet contribution to the background is cut down using b tagging, as may be seen in figure 4. The b tagging weights (in combination with MET and b jet multiplicity) may be used as a discriminating variable to separate signal and background.

Figure 4: Signal and background for the MSSM Higgs A/H/h channel: (left) without b tagging (right) with b tagging.

References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, “The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider”, JINST 3:S08003,2008.
  2. ATLAS Collaboration, “Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment, Detector, Trigger and Physics”, CERN-OPEN-2008-020, Geneva, 2008, to appear.
  3. T. Sjöstrand et al., Comp. Phys. Commun.135 (2001) 238.
  4. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau and A. Polosa, JHEP 0307 (2003) 001.
  5. J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, arXiv:hep-ph/0006304v1. JHEP 0207, (2002), 012.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
302548
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description