Widely tunable, non-degenerate three-wave mixing microwave device operating near the quantum limit

Widely tunable, non-degenerate three-wave mixing microwave device operating near the quantum limit

N. Roch Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    E. Flurin Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    F. Nguyen Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    P. Morfin Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    P. Campagne-Ibarcq Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France    M. H. Devoret Collège de France, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, PO Box 208284, New Haven, CT 06520-8284    B. Huard benjamin.huard@ens.fr Laboratoire Pierre Aigrain, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS (UMR 8551), Université P. et M. Curie, Université D. Diderot 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
July 24, 2019

We present the first experimental realization of a widely frequency tunable, non-degenerate three-wave mixing device for quantum signals at GHz frequency. It is based on a new superconducting building-block consisting of a ring of four Josephson junctions shunted by a cross of four linear inductances. The phase configuration of the ring remains unique over a wide range of magnetic fluxes threading the loop. It is thus possible to vary the inductance of the ring with flux while retaining a strong, dissipation-free, and noiseless non-linearity. The device has been operated in amplifier mode and its noise performance has been evaluated by using the noise spectrum emitted by a voltage biased tunnel junction at finite frequency as a test signal. The unprecedented accuracy with which the crossover between zero-point-fluctuations and shot noise has been measured provides an upper-bound for the noise and dissipation intrinsic to the device.

thanks: Present address: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO 80305

Three-wave mixing devices, i.e. non-linear circuits converting power among three microwave signals, are key elements of analog information processing in the microwave domainPozar (2005). However, they are based on dissipative components such as semiconductor diodes, or SIS tunnel junctions biased near the superconducting gapTinkham (2004). The loss of signal limits their operation and also introduces noise above the minimum required by quantum mechanicsCaves (1982); Clerk et al. (2010). A non-degenerate mixing device with noise close to that minimum level was demonstrated recently Bergeal et al. (2010b, a). However, the hysteresis preventing flux tunability for this 4-junction circuit severely limited possible applications to analog quantum signal processing. In this Letter, we show that by adding four inductances to the 4-junction loop, we can fully suppress the hysteresis and reach a 500MHz frequency tunability while operating close to the quantum limit. Our improvement of the device tunability by an order of magnitude is obtained without jeopardizing other advantages of non-degenerate 3-wave mixing.

An ideal non-degenerate three-wave mixing device in the microwave domain absorbs three signals at frequencies such that with complex amplitudes , and , respectively, and reemits signals at the same frequencies with amplitudes , and such that , that is without internal dissipation. The device can operate in two power amplification modes: i) the photon gain mode, for which , is the pump power providing the extra photon numbers in the re-emitted signals at frequencies and , and ii) the pure up-conversion mode for which , is the pump power providing the energy difference between photons at and photons at . The Josephson Parametric Converter (JPC)Bergeal et al. (2010a), consisting of a ring of four Josephson junctions, can perform both functions. However, its operation has little tunability since the flux applied through the ring has to be adjusted in the close vicinity of the value , where is the flux quantum. In the present work, we consider a more general 3-wave mixing device in which 4 linear inductances are cross-linking the ring-modulator like the spokes of a wheel (see Fig.1a). The hamiltonian of the ring is


where the three spatial mode amplitudes , and are gauge-invariant, orthogonal linear combinations of the superconducting phases of the four nodes of the Josephson junction ring (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1: a. Device schematic: four linear inductances cross-link a ring of four Josephson junctions. Each sub-loop is biased by a magnetic flux . For , the current through the inductances is zero and the external flux phase biases the junctions to . b. The device is embedded at the intersection of four transmission lines and couples to spatial modes , and represented as arrows. c. Optical microscope image of the ring modulator. The meanders in the center of the ring implement the four linear inductances from a. The stripes on the meanders are due to the fabrication process based on shadow evaporation. d. Simplified schematic of the setup used to characterize 3-wave mixing operation. The idler resonator () is excited through a hybrid coupler while the signal resonator () is single-ended. The noise emitted by the voltage biased tunnel junction in its normal state is amplified through the signal port.

We will see below how these standing wave modes can be excited by the propagating mode amplitudes , and and emit the amplitudes , and . In the hamiltonian (1), is the energy associated with each of the inductances , and is the Josephson energy of each tunnel junction. We also define the reduced flux quantum and the dimensionless flux threading each of the nominally identical 4 loops of the device. The first term of the hamiltonian is a pure 3-wave mixing term, while the two others are quadratic terms determining the effective inductance of modes , and : . The value maximizes the strength of the mixing term. Provided that , modes and can be tuned by varying while retaining their stability: on the whole range of variation. However, there is a range of fluxes for which where the device departs from so that the expansion (1) is inappropriate. If the inductances are lowered even more such that , then all three modes of the device are stable for every value of , but at the expense of significant dilution of the non-linear term. In contrast, as is lowered below , dilution of non-linearity is minimized, but at the expense of the stability of the three modes. This is why the JPC, for which , can operate only within a small range of values of forbidding any tunability of the device.

We have tested this new, tunable, mixing element design, by inserting the ring into a resonant structure consisting of two transmission line resonators coupled to the and modes (Fig. 1d) as in Ref. Abdo et al. (2011). The mode is non-resonant and excited through resonator X using a hybrid coupler (Fig. 1d). By varying the externally applied flux, it is possible to adjust the and resonator frequencies given by


where is the resonance frequency of the bare resonator without a ring, its lumped-element equivalent inductancePozar (2005) and its characteristic impedance. As long as , the ring inductance is given by

Figure 2: a. Dots: Measured resonance frequency of the signal cavity as a function of flux applied to the ring modulator without pump. Solid line: fit of using Eq. (2) with , , and including the known stray inductance around the loop (see ref.not ()). b. Reflection gain measured on the signal port as a function of frequency for various values of the flux indicated by the color lines in a. Pump parameters are optimized for each curve. The numbers on top represent the compression point (maximum input power) expressed in input photon rate per dynamical bandwidth for six different working frequencies coded by color.

The device presented in Fig. 1c is realized in a single e-beam lithography step. The critical current of the Al/AlO/Al Josephson junctions was designed to be in the range. The wide geometric linear inductances cross-linking the ring are approximately given by where is the length of each of the four meanders. According to theory, they should present negligible kinetic inductanceAnnunziata et al. (2010). The value of the ratio should favor the stability of the X and Y modes.

The device was operated in the photon gain mode. The phase and amplitude of the waves and , relative to those of and are measured with a vector network analyzer, for a whole set of pump tones . Turning off the pump tone first, we obtained the resonance frequency of both resonators as a function of flux (see Fig. 2a) as well as their half-maximum bandwidths and . Unlike in the JPC, no hysteresis was found in the dependence of the resonance frequency on applied flux, confirming the stability of our device. However, two regimes must be distinguished in the data: that of the wide arches obeying (2) with a ring inductance given by (3) and that of the narrow arches for which and where the ring inductance depends precisely on the non-zero value of emerging from the broken symmetry along the mode. It is interesting to note that the two possible opposite values for in this regime give exactly the same resonance frequency. Besides, the fit of Fig. 2a does not take into account the perturbative effect of the parasitic inductances in series with the junctions. Using the full hamiltonian and these stray inductances, a complete agreement with the data can be obtained over the full flux variation range not ().

The power gain of the device is defined as the ratio of the reflected power with pump on and off. The dependence of the gain on the pump power is shown on Fig. 3. Note in particular that a dynamical bandwidth is obtained for a gain of . We checked that the parametric amplifier relation holds to less than a MHz of deviation for any pump power yielding a gain greater than 5 dB, for both signal and idler waves, as theory predicts Bergeal et al. (2010b).

Figure 3: Reflection gain of the phase-preserving Josephson amplifier observed on the signal Y (a) and the idler X (b) modes. The color bar indicates the pump power referred to the output of the generator. The pump frequency is and the flux is set to .

As illustrated on Fig. 2b, the amplifier center frequency can be flux-tuned over which represents a range two orders of magnitude greater than the bandwidth at 20dB. Indeed, for each center frequency, we can find a reproducible set of applied flux, pump power and pump frequency yielding a gain higher than and a dynamical bandwidth of (Fig 2b). No amplification was found in the domain of the narrow arches. While this observation cannot be explained directly by the expansion (1), it is consistent with the full hamiltonian that predicts the non-linear term to be significantly spoiled by spurious terms when . The key point of our experiment is that we can still benefit, outside the range of the narrow arches, from a confortable tunable 3-wave non-linearity. The tunability of this non-degenerate amplifier can therefore compete with the state of the art degenerate Josephson amplifiersCastellanos-Beltran et al. (2008); Hatridge et al. (2011); Yamamoto et al. (2008); Vijay et al. (2011); Eichler (2011); Wilson (2010) with the added benefits of pump-signal separation.

We now turn to dynamical range measurements which further characterize the non-linear operation of our device. For these measurements, we first calibrated the attenuation of the line named "Signal In" (Fig. 1d) with an accuracy of 3 dBnot (). We then measured the so-called compression point of the amplifier mode of our device, which is the input power for which the gain is reduced by . As presented on Fig. 2b, this maximal power ranges between and corresponding to 3 and 95 photons per inverse dynamical bandwidth. The reduction in maximal allowed power occurs at lower frequencies where we have also observed that the pump power needed for a given gain is lower than at higher frequencies. We believe that it could be explained by the pump frequency becoming, at lower signal frequencies, resonant with a mode of the crossed resonators. The device would hence depart from the stiff pump condition needed for parametric amplification with maximal dynamic range.

Figure 4: a. Power spectral density as a function of frequency measured at the output of "Signal Out" for three settings: pump off and , pump on and or V. The colored area represents the averaging range used in the right panel. b. Average power spectral density over a bandwidth around the center frequency of the amplifier as a function of bias voltage . The solid line shows what is expected using Eq. (5) and fitting an overall gain and an extra noise of 2.8 quanta coming both from the unavoidable quantum noise of the idler port (0.5 quanta) and the unwanted losses between the tunnel junction and the amplifier (2.3 quanta). The gain allows us to express this power spectral density in units of photon number or quantum.

In a last series of experiments, the noise of our device was assessed by using the noise emitted by a voltage biased NIN tunnel junction as input signal. This noise, which is well-understood and therefore of predictable amplitude, plays the role of an in situ calibrated signal. At small electronic temperatures (), the noise from a tunnel junction presents two regimes as a function of voltage. For , zero-point fluctuations across the junction dominate with a power spectral density , while for , electrons in the junction produce non-equilibrium shot noise and . The electronic temperature in the electrodes of the junction sets the sharpness of the crossover between these two regimes Schoelkopf et al. (1997); Blanter and Buttiker (2000) as with


Our experiment was performed using an aluminum junction kept in its normal state by permanent magnets close-by. We measured in situ a normal resistance of (measurement lines not shown on Fig. 1b). The output spectral density was recorded with a spectrum analyzer and averaged over a bandwidth around the center frequency of the amplifier (see Fig. 4a). Its dependence with bias voltage was obtained (Fig. 4b) for an amplifier gain of with the same settings as in Fig. 3. The measured power spectral density is remarkably well described by an expression of the form:


In the shot noise regime, it is possible to calibrate the system gain from the NIN tunnel element to the spectrum analyzer including a possible attenuation from the element to the input port of the amplifier. Without any additional calibration, we extracted the apparent system added noise at the plateau (Fig. 4b). This number of quanta can be thought of as the standard half quantum attributable to the unavoidable quantum noise of the load at the idler port, and 2.3 quanta left which can be seen as an upper bound on the extra noise generated inside the device. On the other hand, an electronic temperature equal to the refrigerator mixing chamber temperature of describes perfectly the crossover. It is worth emphasizing that the noise power of the total measurement setup is presented in Fig. 4 without any background subtraction and is therefore the full absolute  system noise. In fact, there is a finite attenuation between the junction and the amplifier leading to an underestimation of the gain counted from the input of amplifier and hence to the actual noise added by the device. Besides the unwanted insertion loss inherent to our type of low temperature measurement setup, the complex impedance of the junction itself is imperfectly matchedSpietz et al. (2010). Given the size of the junction () and previous experiments on similar junctions, we estimated its capacitance to be in the range. Using the resistance of the junction and the characteristic impedance of the amplifier, we calculated that the loss of signal due to the RC filtering of the junction noise leads to an apparent added noise between and photons. Our measurement thus improves the found by Bergeal et al. in that the measurement frequency and bandwidth are substantially higherBergeal et al. (2010b). It is straightforward to compare the noise measurement with and without our device. Turning off the pump tone, the same noise measurement using only a state-of-the-art HEMT amplifier at Weinreb et al. (1988) yielded an apparent added noise 20 times larger than with the pump on. This translates into an acquisition time 400 times longer, keeping the same bandwidth.

In conclusion, we have shown that it is possible to realize with Josephson tunnel junctions a widely tunable, dissipation-less, non-degenerate 3-wave mixing element which processes microwave signals, adding a level of noise not significantly greater than the level of unavoidable quantum noise. Such an element could be useful in a certain number of analog quantum signal processing applications, like the feedback control of the state of a quantum bitKorotkov (2005).

Acknowledgments: Discussions with the Quantronics group at CEA Saclay, as well as with F. Mallet, F. Schackert and T. Kontos have been greatly useful. We gratefully acknowledge O. Andrieu and J.C. Dumont for technical support. The devices have been made within the consortium Salle Blanche Paris Centre. We thank D. Mailly for helping us dicing wafers at LPN-Marcoussis and the Quantronics group for metal evaporations. This work was supported by the EMERGENCES program Contract of Ville de Paris and by the ANR contract ULAMSIG.


  • Pozar (2005) D. Pozar, Microwave engineering (J. Wiley, 2005).
  • Tinkham (2004) M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity (Dover Publications, 2004).
  • Caves (1982) C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817 (1982).
  • Clerk et al. (2010) A. Clerk et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  • Bergeal et al. (2010b) N. Bergeal et al., Nature (London) 465, 64 (2010b).
  • Bergeal et al. (2010a) N. Bergeal et al., Nature Phys. 6, 296 (2010a).
  • Abdo et al. (2011) B. Abdo et al., App. Phys. Lett. 99, 162506 (2011).
  • Annunziata et al. (2010) A. J. Annunziata et al., Nanotech. 21, 445202 (2010).
  • (9) More details can be found in the ancillary file Supplementary_material.pdf
  • Castellanos-Beltran et al. (2008) M. A. Castellanos-Beltran et al., Nature Phys. 4, 928 (2008).
  • Hatridge et al. (2011) M. Hatridge et al., Phys. Rev. B 83, 134501 (2011).
  • Yamamoto et al. (2008) T. Yamamoto et al., App. Phys. Lett. 93, 042510 (2008).
  • Vijay et al. (2011) R. Vijay, D. H. Slichter, and I. Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110502 (2011).
  • Eichler (2011) C. Eichler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113601 (2011)
  • Wilson (2010) C. M. Wilson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 233907 (2010)
  • (16) To calibrate the attenuation of the "Signal In" line, we first measure the amplification of the "Signal Out" line using the tunnel junction spectrum. We can then easily deduce the attenuation at the input by measuring the transmission from "Signal In" to "Signal Out" lines over a wide range of powers. A 3 dB uncertainty remains due to the imperfectly known impedance of the tunnel junction.
  • Schoelkopf et al. (1997) R. J. Schoelkopf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3370 (1997).
  • Blanter and Buttiker (2000) Y. Blanter and M. Buttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
  • Spietz et al. (2010) L. Spietz et al., App. Phys. Lett. 97, 142502 (2010).
  • Weinreb et al. (1988) S. Weinreb, M. W. Pospieszalski, and R. Norrod, Microwave Symposium Digest, IEEE MTT-S International 2 945 (1988).
  • Korotkov (2005) A. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 71, 201305 (2005)
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description