wavEMS: Improving Signal Variation Freedom of Electrical Muscle Stimulation

wavEMS: Improving Signal Variation Freedom of Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Michinari Kono
The University of Tokyo
e-mail: mchkono@acm.org
   Jun Rekimoto
The University of Tokyo Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc.
e-mail: rekimoto@acm.org
Abstract

There has been a long history in electrical muscle stimulation (EMS), which has been used for medical and interaction purposes. Human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers are now working on various applications, including virtual reality (VR), notification, and learning. For the electric signals applied to the human body, various types of waveforms have been considered and tested. In typical applications, pulses with short duration are applied, however, many perspectives are required to be considered. In addition to the duration and polarity of the pulse/waves, the wave shapes can also be an essential factor to consider. A problem of conventional EMS toolkits and systems are that they have a limitation to the variety of signals that it can produce. For example, some may be limited to monophonic pulses. Furthermore, they are usually limited to rectangular pulses and a limited range of frequencies, and other waveforms cannot be produced. These kinds of limitations make us challenging to consider variations of EMS signals in HCI research and applications. The purpose of “wavEMS” is to encourage testing of a variety of waveforms for EMS, which can be manipulated through audio output. We believe that this can help improve HCI applications, and to open up new application areas.

\onlineid

0 \vgtccategoryResearch \vgtcinsertpkg\preprinttextIEEE VR 2019 Workshop on Human Augmentation and its Applications \CCScatlist \CCScatTwelveHuman-centered computingHuman computer interaction (HCI)Interaction devicesHaptic devices; \CCScatTwelveGeneral and referenceDocument typesGeneral literature; \CCScatTwelveHuman-centered computingHuman computer interaction (HCI)Interaction devices

\firstsection

Introduction

The use of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is becoming popular in human-computer interaction (HCI) and virtual reality (VR) fields. While the original technique is rooted in the medical field for rehabilitation purposes, it is now common to explore interactive applications. Before HCI researchers found their interest for EMS, some artists used them for embodied performances. In 1995, an artist Stelarc used electrical stimulation for his performance [30]. Furthermore, Elsenaar [6] and Manabe [21] applied EMS on to their face for their performances. Following these applications, in 2010, Tamaki et al. [32] introduced EMS to HCI by presenting finger manipulation techniques, which was a pioneering work in the field. Since this work, many researchers are now using EMS for HCI, and many workshops have been held (e.g., [16]).

While EMS can perform as a strong mean for human augmentation purposes, researchers may still find it difficult to understand the appropriate waveforms and safety concerns. These kinds of knowledge tend to spread around various research fields, which makes HCI researchers difficult to follow them comprehensively [12]. In HCI, researchers mainly use square waves for the stimulation, however, using other waveforms may have potential to expand the effect of the electrical stimulation. Therefore, to further encourage researchers to explore using various waveforms, we provide literature on the effect of EMS waveforms and a system that can provide various waveforms for the stimulation. The system allows to output signals through audio input, where the audio signals are directly converted to electrical stimulation. We named this system wavEMS, which is a wireless mobile EMS toolkit.

The contributions of this paper, are concluded as follows.

  • We conclude the history and the effect of waveforms of EMS from literature in research fields other than HCI, and to help researchers consider exploring various waveforms of EMS.

  • We propose wavEMS, which is a toolkit for researchers and practitioners. The system can be controlled via wireless audio signals, and the waveforms can be designed freely.

1 Research on EMS in HCI

1.1 Application in HCI

There are many EMS research for various applications, including VR [17, 18], learning [32, 5], and many others. Muscle-plotter [19] used multiple channels of EMS to guide users to move their hand for hand output activities. Niijima et al. [24] applied EMS to the face, in order to control the contraction of the bodily muscles. Pfeiffer et al. [27] applied EMS on to the user’s leg to control the walking direction. We can notice that EMS can be applied to various body parts. This is also an important feature of EMS, where they can be built in a tiny package with strong output force [15]. Another interesting domain is to use EMS for emotion expression [11, 7]. As well as Impacto [17], which is a work that used EMS for VR feedback, the tactile element (tingling) of EMS can disturb the performance of such applications. We believe that there is a possibility where we can restrain this negative effect by considering more suitable EMS waveforms.

1.2 Systems for EMS in HCI

To build applications, researchers have also developed some systems for EMS. Let your body Move toolkit [26] is a common system that is used for many following EMS research in HCI. Zap++ [4] was a system with a maximum of 20 channel output. The system is designed for a sleeve worn on the arm, where various combinations of the electrodes are allowed for the stimulation output. multi-ems [10] was also an opensource toolkit for multiple channel output. For these systems, the signals of the EMS are controlled by switches, and generate square waved pulses for output. Manabe et al. used an EMS board for their workshop [22], which was controlled by audio output. The board also allows improving the signal variations of EMS. However, it consists of two large transformers (140 g each), which can disturb its mobility. Another concern is that where the system can allow dangerous signal output when used without appropriate knowledge. Therefore, we provide a user interface for popular waveforms to restrict dangerous output, and literature for effective signals. Another benefit of wavEMS is where it can be small/light and can be controlled via wireless communication.

2 History and Parameters of Electrical Muscle Stimulation

The history of EMS is rooted from 1791, when Luigi Galvani used electric current to cause a muscle of a frog to constract [3]. At this time the mechanism was still unknown, however, attracted great scientific interest, and was studied through the 1800s to reveal the principles [2]. In 1903, Prof. Leduc introduced a form of electric current to minimize the energy for muscle contraction [23]. This was where the pulsed inputs that are still used nowadays, were investigated and applied for muscle stimulation. For the experiments, an anaesthetized cat was used to observe the effect of stimulation [23]. The terms “Chronaxie” and “Rheobase” was first stated in Lapicque’s paper in 1909 [8]. These terms are used to discuss the relationship between the strength and duration of a rectangular pulse and it’s threshold (Figure 1). Later in 1977, “Russian currents” have been reported by Yakov Kots [34]. Russian currents consist of 2.5 kHz AC signals that are burst modulated at 50 Hz with a 50 % duty cycle. Although this seemed to be an effective method for electrical stimulation, it is now been studied to be inferior to other types of signals [2]. Since then, various research with various signals has been conducted and may devices have been created for rehabilitation and training purposes [14, 31].

When using EMS, considering the type of signal is an important element. There are studies that have compared various types of waveforms [31, 1] (Figure 2). Araújo et al. noted that square waveforms can be more uncomfortable compared with triangular and quadratic waveforms [1]. Laufer et al. said that monophasic and biphasic signals have an advantage over polyphasic waveforms (2.5 kHz) regarding the generated fatigue [13]. Petrofsky et al. compared sine, square and the Russian waveform, and found that sine waves were less painful, still having a greater muscle strength [25]. For monophasic and biphasic signals, there are arguments for both waveforms [6, 33, 28]. For example, biphasic waves can give a sharper sensation, while they can be benefical to reduce fatigue. Prausnitz presented a review for the effect of the current applied to the skin [29]. For interactive use cases, Knibbe et al. concluded that various parameters can be explained differently when experienced [9]. Other considerations include the electrode size that also may influence the stimulation of EMS [20]. Researchers should carefully consider the parameters for their purposes.

Figure 1: Chronaxie and rheobase are points on the amplitude-duration curve for stimuling tissues/nerves.
Figure 2: Types of waveforms used in EMS. A specific stimulus, burst sine wave of a carrier frequency of 2,500 Hz and burst and inter-burst duration of 10 ms is called a Russian current.

3 wavEMS

3.1 Hardware Design

We named our system “wavEMS,” and the system is shown in Figure 3 and 4.

The implementation consists of a Bluetooth module, piezo amplifier, battery, and voltage converters. RN-52 (Microchip Technology) allows the toolkit to connect to mobile devices or computers, and receives the audio signals. A 3.7 V Li-ion battery is used, which is converted to 12 V and 5 V with DC-DC converters. The audio signals and the converted power source activates a PWM amplifier (IFJM-001, Marutsuelec Co., Ltd.), which outputs EMS signals to the electrodes (the maximum voltage is 60 V, and the current is limited to a maximum of 100 mA). For the software, we prepared a Processing program that can output typical EMS waveforms. However, for wavEMS, any type of audio can be used for stimulation output. wavEMS allows to output various waveforms including; sine waves, triangle waves, square waves, Russian current, and other desired waveforms. Waveforms of EMS can influence the experience in many ways. Another important benefit of wavEMS, is where it is controlled wirelessly. This helps in improving the mobility of EMS prototyping.

One negative aspect of wavEMS is where it can output signals that are not usually used for EMS, and can be dangerous without knowledge. Therefore, when using wavEMS, understandings of safety will be more strictly required. We recommend going through safety guidelines [12], and to check the considerable threats, especially the effect of the frequency.

Figure 3: The system overview of wavEMS.
Figure 4: The prototype design of wavEMS.
Figure 5: The user interface. Users can choose and manipulate the output waveforms.

3.2 How to Use

The audio output from the computer can be used for wavEMS. For prototyping, we provide a user interface which is designed based on the Minim library111http://code.compartmental.net/minim/ of Processing222https://processing.org/. In this user interface, the user can choose the output waveform from sine, saw, square waves of Russian current, as well as the frequency and pulse width (Figure 5). This allows users to try popular types of outputs, which are considered safe and effective. The controller of wavEMS is not limited to Processing, and other tools such as Max/MSP can be used. Furthermore, audios from other resources can be used (e.g., Youtube), and can be used to feel the sound output of various audio. However, we must note that using audio signals can sometimes become dangerous. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to follow safety guides [12], and not to attach electrodes to uncommon body parts (around or close to the chest).

3.3 Performance

The prototype of wavEMS was tested by the author. Frequencies were adjusted between 20–400 Hz and pulse widths were adjusted between 40–600 s. The system successfully provided outputs with the desired parameters, with the desired waveform (both monophasic and biphasic), and appropriate muscular contraction was observed. However, due to characteristics of the filter of the system, the intensity tended to differ depending on the waveform, when the audio output was set to a fixed level on the computer used for the signal generation. Currently, the intensity tended to be stronger for square waves, and lower for triangular waves. Therefore, we set the gain of through the Minim library for square, sine, and triangular waves at -2, 2, 6 respectively via software. However, it is still recommended to adjust these gain parameters more precisely, when comparing the effect of the waveforms at the same intensity.

Figure 6 shows the output of wavEMS observed through an oscilloscope, with a 10 k resistor. We are aware that there are noises on the waves, however, due to the nature of human perception to electricity, we believe that high-frequency noises are not perceptual and have only a minor effect to the EMS experience.

Figure 6: The waves are set to biphasic 160 Hz, 120 s pulse width. They are sine, triangular, squared and Russian current output respectively.

4 Discussion

When experiencing stimulation from EMS systems, it is common to use signals around 1–150 Hz and pulse width with 30–800 [12]. Signals around this area can be usually effective for muscle actuation purposes. However, it is known that signals at high-frequencies are more difficult to be perceived by the human body. Therefore, using audio signals with high frequencies may not be effective for muscle stimulating purposes. In addition, risks for heat generation can become more noticeable in such situation, thus should not be used for a long duration continuously.

As a limitation of our current system, the system only allows a single channel output. Furthermore, there are still areas of improvements regarding energy efficiency. We plan to improve these elements and to provide the system as an opensource toolkit.

The bus voltage can be controlled by the resistance of the resistor included in the circuit, and lower bus voltage can improve the reactive power and electromagnetic interference. For our initial testing, we use a 3.9 k resistor for the amplifier to adjust the bus voltage (this allows to emit the maximum voltage at 60 V). However, this amplitude may be too strong for many users, and typically, lower voltage can be enough for HCI purposes. Therefore, this resistor can be replaced with a large resistance, which can contribute to energy efficiency as well.

For typical square pulsed based EMS systems, galvanic isolation between the power source side and the signal generation side are applied to improve safety. In our current implementation, the board is isolated with the signal generator (e.g., computer) by using Bluetooth communication, however, it still does not have isolation between the circuits of the signal receiver and the power source. Therefore, users must keep in mind not to touch the system while it is active, or otherwise should be covered with insulating materials.

5 Conclusion

This paper introduces wavEMS, an audio-based EMS system for prototyping and research explorations. While many HCI researchers use squared pulsed-waves, there are also potential to use other variations of waveforms, which may lead to different muscular effects and skin perception. Therefore, it is important for us to extend the possibility of the waveforms of EMS for further research development in HCI. In order to provide such opportunity, we developed wavEMS, which consists of a Bluetooth module and an amplifier for audio signals. A user interface was developed, so that researchers can test variations of typical EMS waveforms with various parameters. Our system allows improving the signal variation freedom of electrical stimulation. We believe that this paper can help improve HCI applications, and to open up new application areas.

Acknowledgements.
We thank Marutsuelec and the developers of the amplifier for giving us suggestions for improvement.

References

  • [1] T. Araújo, A. Anjos, N. Nunes, P. Rebelo, and H. Gamboa. Quadriceps muscle fatigue and comfort generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with current modulated waveforms. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 4, BIOSTEC 2015, pp. 92–98. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda, Portugal, 2015. doi: 10 . 5220/0005267400920098
  • [2] G. Boschetti. EMS Digest. Globus Sport and Health Technologies, LLC, 2008.
  • [3] M. Bresadola. Medicine and science in the life of luigi galvani (1737–1798). Brain Research Bulletin, 46(5):367 – 380, 1998. doi: 10 . 1016/S0361-9230(98)00023-9
  • [4] T. Duente, M. Pfeiffer, and M. Rohs. Zap++: A 20-channel electrical muscle stimulation system for fine-grained wearable force feedback. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI ’17, pp. 1:1–1:13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. doi: 10 . 1145/3098279 . 3098546
  • [5] A. Ebisu, S. Hashizume, K. Suzuki, A. Ishii, M. Sakashita, and Y. Ochiai. Stimulated percussions: Method to control human for learning music by using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference, AH ’17, pp. 33:1–33:5. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. doi: 10 . 1145/3041164 . 3041202
  • [6] J. A. Elsenaar. Facial hacking: the twisted logic of electro-facial choreography. PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent University, October 2010.
  • [7] M. Hassib, M. Pfeiffer, S. Schneegass, M. Rohs, and F. Alt. Emotion actuator: Embodied emotional feedback through electroencephalography and electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, pp. 6133–6146. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. doi: 10 . 1145/3025453 . 3025953
  • [8] W. Irnich. The terms “chronaxie” and “rheobase” are 100 years old. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 33(4):491–496, 2010. doi: 10 . 1111/j . 1540-8159 . 2009 . 02666 . x
  • [9] J. Knibbe, A. Alsmith, and K. Hornbæk. Experiencing electrical muscle stimulation. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2(3):118:1–118:14, Sept. 2018. doi: 10 . 1145/3264928
  • [10] M. Kono, Y. Ishiguro, T. Miyaki, and J. Rekimoto. Design and study of a multi-channel electrical muscle stimulation toolkit for human augmentation. In Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference, AH ’18, pp. 11:1–11:8. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2018. doi: 10 . 1145/3174910 . 3174913
  • [11] M. Kono, T. Miyaki, and J. Rekimoto. In-pulse: Inducing fear and pain in virtual experiences. In Proceedings of the 24st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2018. doi: 10 . 1145/3281505 . 3281506
  • [12] M. Kono, T. Takahashi, H. Nakamura, T. Miyaki, and J. Rekimoto. Design guideline for developing safe systems that apply electricity to the human body. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 25(3):19:1–19:36, June 2018. doi: 10 . 1145/3184743
  • [13] Y. Laufer, J. D. Ries, P. M. Leininger, and G. Alon. Quadriceps femoris muscle torques and fatigue generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with three different waveforms. Physical Therapy, 81(7):1307–1316, 2001. doi: 10 . 1093/ptj/81 . 7 . 1307
  • [14] T. Lloyd, G. D. Domenico, G. R. Strauss, and K. Singer. A review of the use of electro-motor stimulation in human muscles. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 32(1):18 – 30, 1986. doi: 10 . 1016/S0004-9514(14)60640-1
  • [15] P. Lopes and P. Baudisch. Immense power in a tiny package: Wearables based on electrical muscle stimulation. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 16(3):12–16, 2017. doi: 10 . 1109/MPRV . 2017 . 2940953
  • [16] P. Lopes and P. Baudisch. Interactive systems based on electrical muscle stimulation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Studio, SIGGRAPH ’17, pp. 4:1–4:2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. doi: 10 . 1145/3084863 . 3084872
  • [17] P. Lopes, A. Ion, and P. Baudisch. Impacto: Simulating physical impact by combining tactile stimulation with electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’15, pp. 11–19. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015. doi: 10 . 1145/2807442 . 2807443
  • [18] P. Lopes, S. You, L.-P. Cheng, S. Marwecki, and P. Baudisch. Providing haptics to walls and heavy objects in virtual reality by means of electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, pp. 1471–1482. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2017. doi: 10 . 1145/3025453 . 3025600
  • [19] P. Lopes, D. Yüksel, F. Guimbretière, and P. Baudisch. Muscle-plotter: An interactive system based on electrical muscle stimulation that produces spatial output. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’16, pp. 207–217. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016. doi: 10 . 1145/2984511 . 2984530
  • [20] G. Lyons, G. Leane, M. Clarke-Moloney, J. O’Brien, and P. Grace. An investigation of the effect of electrode size and electrode location on comfort during stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle. Medical Engineering and Physics, 26(10):873 – 878, 2004. doi: 10 . 1016/j . medengphy . 2004 . 08 . 003
  • [21] D. Manabe. “face visualizer”, “face instrument”, 2008. http://www.daito.ws/en/work/smiles.html.
  • [22] D. Manabe, M. Ishibashi, and S. Saito. Bodyhack workshop. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, TEI ’10, pp. 345–348. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010. doi: 10 . 1145/1709886 . 1709971
  • [23] O. May. The response of normal and abnormal muscle to leduc’s interrupted current. Brain, 34(2-3):272–290, 1911. doi: 10 . 1093/brain/34 . 2-3 . 272
  • [24] A. Niijima, T. Isezaki, R. Aoki, T. Watanabe, and T. Yamada. Controlling maximal voluntary contraction of the upper limb muscles by facial electrical stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’18, pp. 394:1–394:7. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2018. doi: 10 . 1145/3173574 . 3173968
  • [25] J. Petrofsky, M. Laymon, M. Prowse, S. Gunda, and J. Batt. The transfer of current through skin and muscle during electrical stimulation with sine, square, russian and interferential waveforms. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 33(2):170–181, 2009. doi: 10 . 1080/03091900802054580
  • [26] M. Pfeiffer, T. Duente, and M. Rohs. Let your body move: A prototyping toolkit for wearable force feedback with electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI ’16, pp. 418–427. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016. doi: 10 . 1145/2935334 . 2935348
  • [27] M. Pfeiffer, T. Dünte, S. Schneegass, F. Alt, and M. Rohs. Cruise control for pedestrians: Controlling walking direction using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’15, pp. 2505–2514. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2015. doi: 10 . 1145/2702123 . 2702190
  • [28] M. Pfeiffer and M. Rohs. Haptic Feedback for Wearables and Textiles Based on Electrical Muscle Stimulation, pp. 103–137. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017. doi: 10 . 1007/978-3-319-50124-6_6
  • [29] M. R. Prausnitz. The effects of electric current applied to skin: A review for transdermal drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 18(3):395 – 425, 1996. The Skin as a Site for Drug Delivery: the Liposome Approach and its Alternatives. doi: 10 . 1016/0169-409X(95)00081-H
  • [30] M. Smith and J. Clarke. Stelarc: The Monograph, pp. 10–20. Electronic Culture Series. MIT Press, 2005.
  • [31] K. Takeda, G. Tanino, and H. Miyasaka. Review of devices used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Medical devices (Auckland, NZ), 10:207, 2017. doi: 10 . 2147/MDER . S123464
  • [32] E. Tamaki, T. Miyaki, and J. Rekimoto. Possessedhand: A hand gesture manipulation system using electrical stimuli. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference, AH ’10, pp. 2:1–2:5. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010. doi: 10 . 1145/1785455 . 1785457
  • [33] G. Vrbova, O. Hudlicka, and K. Schaefer Centofanti. Application of Muscle/Nerve Stimulation in Health and Disease, vol. 4, chap. 4, pp. 69–116. Springer Netherlands, 2008.
  • [34] A. R. Ward and N. Shkuratova. Russian electrical stimulation: The early experiments. Physical Therapy, 82(10):1019–1030, 2002. doi: 10 . 1093/ptj/82 . 10 . 1019
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
337054
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description