VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of MAXI J1659–152

VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of the candidate black-hole X-ray binary MAXI J1659–152 in outburst***Based on ESO-VLT/X-shooter observations obtained using the X-shooter guaranteed time GRB program (086.A-0073)

Ramanpreet Kaur11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands 22affiliation: Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA , Lex Kaper11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Lucas E. Ellerbroek11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , David M. Russell11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Diego Altamirano11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Rudy Wijnands11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Yi-Jung Yang11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Paolo D’Avanzo33affiliation: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via E. Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy , Antonio de Ugarte Postigo44affiliation: Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark 88affiliation: IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronoma s/n, 18008 Granada, Spain , Hector Flores55affiliation: GEPI, Paris Observatory, CNRS, University of Paris-Diderot; 5 Place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France , Johan P.U. Fynbo33affiliation: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via E. Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy , Paolo Goldoni66affiliation: Laboratoire Astroparticule et Cosmologie, 10 rue A. Domon et L. Duquet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France 77affiliation: Service dÕAstrophysique, DSM/IRFU/SAp, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France , Christina C. Thne88affiliation: IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronoma s/n, 18008 Granada, Spain 99affiliation: Niels Bohr International Academy, Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark , Alexander van der Horst11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands 1010affiliation: USRA, NSSTC, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA , Michiel van der Klis11affiliation: Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands , Chryssa Kouveliotou1111affiliation: Space Science Office, VP62, NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA , Klaas Wiersema1212affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK and Erik Kuulkers1313affiliation: European Space Agency, European Space Astronomy Centre, P.O. Box 78, 28691, Villanueva de la Caada, Madrid, Spain r.kaur@uva.nl
Abstract

We present the optical to near-infrared spectrum of MAXI J1659–152, during the onset of its 2010 X-ray outburst. The spectrum was obtained with X-shooter on the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) early in the outburst simultaneous with high quality observations at both shorter and longer wavelengths. At the time of the observations, the source was in the low-hard state. The X-shooter spectrum includes many broad ( km s), double-peaked emission profiles of H, He i, He ii, characteristic signatures of a low-mass X-ray binary during outburst. We detect no spectral signatures of the low-mass companion star. The strength of the diffuse interstellar bands results in a lower limit to the total interstellar extinction of 0.4 mag. Using the neutral hydrogen column density obtained from the X-ray spectrum we estimate  mag. The radial-velocity structure of the interstellar Na i D and Ca ii H&K lines results in a lower limit to the distance of 1 kpc, consistent with previous estimates. With this distance and , the dereddened spectral energy distribution represents a flat disk spectrum. The two 10 minute X-shooter spectra show significant variability in the red wing of the emission-line profiles, indicating a global change in the density structure of the disk, though on a timescale much shorter than the typical viscous timescale of the disk.

(stars:) binaries: general, accretion, accretion disks - black hole physics - X-rays: binaries

1 Introduction

Transient low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) form a sub-class of compact binary systems in which a neutron star or a black hole accretes matter from a low-mass companion through Roche-lobe overflow and occasionally undergo X-ray outbursts, during which their X-ray flux increases by several orders of magnitude in comparison to the quiescent state (Tanaka and Lewin 1995; van Paradijs and McClintock 1995). These outbursts have been observed on the timescales from a few weeks to several years. In outburst the X-ray emission of these systems is directly related to the accretion process and originates from the inner accretion disk while the optical emission is dominated from the reprocessed emission from the accretion disk with some contribution from the heated surface of the companion star. Many transient LMXBs have been studied in detail in the X-rays, but for only a few systems simultaneous high quality optical spectroscopy has been obtained during their outburst (e.g. GX 339–4: Soria et al. 1999, XTE J1118+480: Dubus et al. 2001). The latter is important to study the large-scale physical structure of the accretion disk.

On September 25, 2010, at UT 08h05, the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; Barthelmy et al. 2005) onboard the Swift satellite was triggered by a transient source, first thought to be a gamma-ray burst: GRB 100925A (Mangano et al., 2010). On the same day, the Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) satellite (Matsuoka et al., 2009) also reported the discovery of a new transient, named MAXI J1659–152 (hereafter MAXI1659), at a position consistent with the GRB (Negoro et al., 2010). Subsequently, a number of space-based and ground-based observations were carried out to investigate the nature of this source (e.g. van der Horst et al. 2010, Vovk et al. 2010). Immediately after the BAT trigger, the UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) onboard the Swift satellite (Roming et al., 2005) detected the optical counterpart of MAXI1659 with a magnitude of 16.8 in the white filter (Marshall, 2010).

On September 25 at UT 23h39, the X-shooter spectrograph on the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) was pointed at the optical counterpart and registered an optical to near-infrared spectrum of MAXI1659 revealing the Galactic origin of the source (de Ugarte Postigo et al., 2010). The X-shooter spectrum showed various broad double peaked emission line profiles, as typically observed in X-ray binaries when they actively accrete.

Subsequent studies of the X-ray spectral and timing behaviour of the source (Kalamkar et al. 2011, Kennea et al. 2011, Muñoz-Darias et al. 2011) demonstrated that the system is a candidate black-hole X-ray binary. MAXI1659 also shows regular, though not really periodic dips in the X-ray intensity with a period of approximately 2.42h (Kennea et al. 2011, Kuulkers et al. 2011), pointing at a high orbital inclination. This is also interpreted as an orbital period and makes MAXI1659 the shortest orbital period black-hole X-ray binary candidate with an estimated distance of 7 kpc and possibly an M5 dwarf companion (Kuulkers et al. 2010, Belloni et al. 2010, Kuulkers et al. 2011). Later on, the distance was suggested to be within 1.6 - 4.2 kpc (Miller-Jones et al., 2011). Like some other transient LMXBs (e.g. Swift J1753–0127, XTE J1118+480, GRO J0422+32, cf. Zurita et al. 2008 ) MAXI1659 is at a high Galactic latitude (b = +16.49).

In this paper, we report on the optical to near-infrared VLT/X-shooter spectra of MAXI1659 taken during the beginning of its 2010 X-ray outburst (see de Ugarte Postigo et al. 2010 for a preliminary report).

2 Observations and data reduction

We observed the optical counterpart of MAXI1659 on September 25, 2010, starting at UT 23h39 (MJD 55464.99) after triggering the X-shooter guaranteed time GRB program (086.A-0073, PI Fynbo) on the VLT. X-shooter is a wide-band, medium-resolution spectrograph, consisting of 3 arms. Each arm is an independent cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph with its own slit unit. The incoming light is split using dichroics, resulting in three spectral ranges: UVB (3000–5900 Å), VIS (5500–10200 Å) and NIR (10000–24800 Å). A detailed description of the instrument is provided by D’Odorico et al. (2006) and Vernet et al. (2011).

We obtained two spectra of MAXI1659 of 600s, starting at UT 23h39 and UT 23h50, at two different nodding positions on the slit. A slit width of 1.0″ was used for the UVB arm while a 0.9″ slit was used for the VIS and NIR arm; the corresponding resolving power is R  5100, 7500, and 5700, respectively. A telluric standard star (HIP083448) was observed immediately after the MAXI1659 observations. The spectrophotometric standard (Feige 110) was observed the night before, with the same slit configuration as used for MAXI1659. The seeing was 1.8″ in the V  band.

We used the ESO X-shooter pipeline version 1.2.0 (Goldoni et al. 2006, Modigliani et al. 2010) to obtain the wavelength calibrated and rectified two-dimensional spectra. The observations were reduced both in nodding and in staring mode, where in the latter case the two exposures were reduced separately. The one-dimensional spectrum was extracted and normalized using the standard IRAF routines apall and continuum. The resultant spectrum was corrected for the Earth’s motion with respect to the local standard of rest (LSR) and the NIR spectrum was corrected for telluric absorption lines. The complete X-shooter spectrum was flux calibrated order-by-order relative to the flux table of spectrophotometric standard Feige 110. The obtained signal to noise ratio for the combined spectra is 46, 37 and 8 in the UVB, VIS and NIR arm, respectively.

We also analysed the archival optical and ultraviolet observations of MAXI1659 obtained with UVOT onboard the Swift satellite starting on September 26, 2010 at UT 0h07, 8 minutes after the X-shooter observations (see also Kennea et al. 2011). The image data of each of the six filters used were summed using uvotimsum and photometry of the source in individual sequences was derived with uvotsource. MAXI1659 is clearly detected at a significance of in all six filters (1900–5500 Å). Three trial extraction region radii of 3″, 4″, and 5″were used, and the magnitude in each filter were derived from the range of output values.

3 Results

3.1 Emission lines

The X-shooter spectrum of MAXI1659 includes a number of emission lines of H, He i and He ii. Fig. 1 displays the normalized X-shooter spectrum of MAXIJ1659 in the range 3000-10000 Å  where all identified spectral lines are labelled at their respective wavelengths. Among the hydrogen lines, we detect the Balmer series from H up to H and the Paschen series from Pa up to Pa–11. Fig. 2 displays the three strongest line profiles on a velocity scale showing a double-peaked structure. Table 1 lists all the spectral lines detected along with the line-profile parameters, measured using the IRAF routine splot.

All emission lines are very broad: the full width at half maximum (FWHM) is in the range of 1500–2000 km s. The peak separation is measured as the difference in the central position of two gaussians fitted to the wing of each individual component; for the weaker emission-line profiles, it is difficult to determine whether they are also double-peaked. The peak separation varies from 918 to 1175 km s, with a clear increasing trend among the H Balmer lines, except for H (see Fig. 3). A similar trend in the peak-to-peak separation has been observed in GX 339–4 but among H, He i and He ii lines (Wu et al., 2001). Such a trend indicates that higher excitation lines show a larger peak separation, i.e. they are formed closer to the black hole where the disk is hotter and more rapidly rotating. However, in our spectra, the He lines do not seem to follow this trend (Fig. 3). A possible explanation may be that the He lines are predominantly produced near the hot spot (see below). The disk velocity of the system is 156 42 km s, measured as the difference of the velocity of the center of the two peaks of a line with respect to its rest velocity. Only the strongest emission lines are used to measure the disk velocity.

In a number of LMXBs, a Bowen blend is detected at 4650–4660 Å, usually attributed to the high excitation lines of the N iii 4634–4641 Å/C iii 4647–4650 Å formed due to the Bowen fluorescence mechanism (BFM, McClintock et al. 1975, Steeghs and Casares 2002; Casares et al. 2006). In MAXI1659 we detect a broad but weak emission line feature centered at 4628 Å with a FWHM of 2640 km s which is likely due to the Bowen blend. However we detect no narrow peaks/structures corresponding to the individual N iii components in this blend. The central velocity of this feature is –775  km s, which is very different from the disk velocity of the system (156 km s) and may be related to the disk wind. In another black hole binary XTE J1118+480, the Bowen blend was detected as a weak feature during outburst but was observed to vary in phase with He ii 4686 Å  (Dubus et al., 2001).  Assuming that we observe the varying peak of the Bowen blend, we would expect to detect the red, rather than the blue component as the hydrogen and helium lines show the variability in the red component (see Section 3.2).

3.2 Emission-line variability

During the two 10 minute-observations of MAXI1659, the red wing of the emission-line profile shows significant variability (cf. Fig. 2). During the two observations, the FWHM and the peak separation remain constant while the equivalent width (EW) of the lines increases (e.g., the EW of H increases from –7.30.4 to –8.30.4 Å, cf. Fig. 2). This variability is detected in different lines at the same velocity. As these lines originate in different parts of the spectrum (even in different spectrograph arms) this excludes the possibility that the observed variations are of instrumental nature.

Our X-shooter observations sample the orbital period of the source in which strong dipping is expected as estimated using an X-ray dip activity ephemeris (Kuulkers et al. 2012 in prep). The lack of simultaneous X-ray observations and, the fact that dips in this source show highly irregular structure which can last from a few minutes to as long as min (Kuulkers et al. 2011, Kuulkers et al. 2012 in prep), does not allow us to know which percentage of the X-shooter observations is affected by dips. However, the observed variability in MAXI1659 is similar to that observed in XTE J1118+480 (Dubus et al., 2001); in this system the He ii 4686 Å line time series displays an S-wave pattern consistent with the photometric (i.e. orbital) period of 4.1h. According to Dubus et al. the variable component of the He ii line (as well as that observed in H, H and the Bowen blend) most likely originates in the hot spot of the accretion disk where the accretion flow impacts on the disk.

3.3 Interstellar spectrum and distance to MAXI1659

The spectrum includes a number of interstellar lines: the Na i D and Ca ii H&K lines, and a few diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs); their EW is listed in Table 2. Cox et al. (2005) measured the DIB spectrum in the strongly reddened sightline towards the X-ray binary 4U1907+97 ( = 3.45) and compared the EWs of several DIBs to those observed in the well-studied sightlines towards BD+631964 ( = 1.01) and HD183143 () = 1.28). We calculated the EW ratio of the DIBs detected in MAXI1659 to those in the three mentioned sightlines, and arrive at a ratio of 0.06, 0.13 and 0.08, i.e. an estimate of 0.21, 0.13 and 0.10 mag, respectively. As we do not know the value of in the line of sight to MAXI1659, we used the value for the respective sightlines (2.75, 3.1, and 3.3), and by using = ) we estimate as 0.57, 0.40, and 0.33 mag, respectively. Thus, based on the DIB spectrum, is  mag.

Adding the Swift-UVOT data to extend the spectral coverage of the X-shooter spectrum towards the ultraviolet, we note a broad feature at 2175 Å (“the extinction bump”) which suggests a higher value of the optical extinction (see Section 3.4). Given the height of MAXI1659 above the Galactic plane ( kpc, see below), it may well be that the (still unidentified) DIB carriers are concentrated towards the Galactic plane, thus providing a lower limit to the total extinction.

The EW of the DIB at 5780 Å can be related to the neutral hydrogen column density ; using Cox et al. (2005) a rough estimate of = 0.6 10 cm is obtained. Given the above, we also expect this to be a lower limit to the total value. Swift X-ray observations (Kennea et al., 2011) indicate that the interstellar value is  cm.

An absorption feature is present in the red wing of the H emission line profile. This feature has been observed in other systems (e.g. Buxton and Vennes 2003, Soria et al. 2000, Dubus et al. 2001) and has been interpreted as a redshifted absorption component in H; however, we think it most likely is due to the strong DIB at 4882 Å (Jenniskens and Desert, 1994).

The Na i D and Ca ii H&K interstellar lines are centered at a velocity of  km s with respect to the LSR of the solar environment. A kinematic model of the differential Galactic rotation (Brand and Blitz, 1993) predicts a steady increase of the radial velocity in the direction of MAXI1659 from 0 km s to 122 km s at 8 kpc. The measured radial velocity distribution implies a lower limit to the distance of MAXI1659 of  kpc. The corresponding height above the Galactic plane is  kpc.

3.4 Spectral energy distribution

Fig. 4 shows the flux-calibrated X-shooter spectrum of the optical counterpart of MAXI1659 extended to the ultra-voilet region using the Swift-UVOT photometry. Due to estimated slitlosses, the X-shooter spectrum was scaled up by a factor of 1.75. The thus obtained SED is consistent with the UVOT photometry.

The neutral hydrogen column density increased during the outburst due to absorption intrinsic to the source (Kennea et al., 2011); the initial, and thus likely the interstellar value was cm on MJD 55464 at the start of the outburst. This corresponds (Güver and Özel, 2009) to a visual extinction of  mag. This value is consistent with the value for necessary to remove the extinction bump at 2175 Å  in the UVOT photometry. We note that a slightly higher ( mag) is found by fitting only the UVOT and optical X-shooter SED with a power-law reddened with the Cardelli et al. 1989 extinction law. This different approach will be presented in a forthcoming companion paper (D’Avanzo et al., in preparation). The X-shooter spectrum and UVOT photometry are de-reddened adopting this value and using the extinction laws of Cardelli et al. (1989) and Mathis and Cardelli (1990). The dereddened spectral energy (SED) distribution becomes flat with a continuum rising to the blue as expected for LMXBs in outburst, as shown in red color in Fig. 4.

The whole UV–optical–NIR spectrum can be fitted by a single power law with slope = -1.37 0.14 (where ). The spectrum cannot be fitted by a single temperature blackbody. For an optically thick, non-irradiated disk, we expect a power law with an index of describing a multi-temperature blackbody extending from the optical/NIR regime to the far-UV (Frank et al., 2002). The intrinsic spectrum of MAXI1659 is remarkably consistent with this canonical spectrum. For most LMXBs in outburst, ranges from -2.5 to -1.5 as observed from their optical/NIR spectra and originates in the irradiated outer disk (e.g. Hynes 2005). There is no significant variation in the spectral slope or colour of the UV–optical SED during the outburst (Kennea et al., 2011). This suggests that the non-irradiated disc dominates the emission throughout the entire outburst of MAXI1659.

4 Discussion

The optical to near-infrared spectrum of MAXI1659, taken during the beginning of the 2010 X-ray outburst, is consistent with a black-hole LMXB in the low-hard state (see Kennea et al. 2011 for the determination of the source state at the time of our X-shooter observations). The spectrum includes a number of double-peaked emission profiles revealing the fast rotation of the accretion disk. The observed trend in peak separation of the hydrogen Balmer line with excitation energy reveals the rotation profile of the accretion disk, where the inner and hotter regions of the disk rotate faster than the outer regions (Smak, 1981).

Although we obtained only two spectra, a significant increase is observed in the red peak of the emission lines on a ten-minute timescale. This timescale is much shorter than the timescale associated with the outburst and the viscous timescale of the disk, estimated of the order of days to weeks for typical accretion disk parameters (Frank et al., 2002). It is possible that the observed change in the double-peaked emission lines is related to an S-wave pattern as observed in XTE J1118+480 (Dubus et al., 2001) caused by the revolving hot spot where the accretion stream from the low-mass companion star impacts onto the disk. This may then also explain why the He lines do not follow the same trend in varying peak separation as the H Balmer lines. An alternative explanation for the observed line-profile variability could be the warping of the disk propagating with time (Maloney and Begelman, 1997). Another possibility could be the presence of a revolving structure in the accretion disk which has also been proposed as a possibly cause of the X-ray dipping behavior (Díaz Trigo et al. 2006, Díaz Trigo et al. 2009, Boirin et al. 2005).

The SED extending from the far-ultraviolet down to the near-infrared is flat when dereddened with  mag, consistent with an optically thick, non-irradiated accretion disk (Fig 4.). The visual extinction is consistent with that derived from the 2175 Å feature and the observed from the X-ray observations. The DIBs indicate a smaller extinction, suggesting that the (unknown) DIB carrier(s) are concentrated towards the Galactic plane, apparently unlike the carrier of the 2175 Å feature. A supporting argument is that MAXI1659 is located far above the Galactic plane ( kpc for a distance of 4 kpc), like the other very few LMXBs (White and van Paradijs, 1996). which are possibly ejected out of the Galactic plane due to large kick received during the supernova explosion; alternatively, they are remnants of the population of massive stars formed during early stages of the evolution of the Galaxy (Mirabel et al., 2001).

The measured spectral slope is similar to that observed in the black-hole LMXB XTE J1118+480: (Dubus et al., 2001). In this source, synchrotron emission from the compact jet is known to contribute a large fraction of the optical/NIR flux in the low-hard state, making the spectrum redder than most usually reported for LMXBs (e.g., Hynes et al. 2003). It is plausible that the jet of MAXI1659 detected at radio frequencies (e.g. van der Horst et al. 2010) could contribute to the X-shooter spectrum of MAXI1659 as the source was in the low-hard state during the observation, which is commonly associated with compact jets seen in the optical/NIR (e.g. Buxton and Bailyn 2004; Russell et al. 2006; Coriat et al. 2009). It would be interesting to monitor the system during an outburst to study the disk revolution and longer -term evolution in response to the outburst. It will remain very difficult to detect the low-mass companion star and/or measure the mass of the black hole.

Acknowledgements

RK, RW and JPUF acknowledge support from the European Research Council starting grant.

Figure 1: The X-shooter normalized spectrum of MAXI J1659-152 in the wavelength range 3000 - 10000 Å, with all identified spectral lines labelled at their respective wavelengths.
Figure 2: The observed double-peaked emission lines in the spectrum of MAXIJ1659 on a velocity scale (black : observation 1 - Sep 25 UT 23:39, red : observation 2 - Sep 25 UT 23:50). Note the variable red wing becoming significantly stronger on a timescale of 10 minutes. Zero on the velocity scale corresponds to the local standard of rest.
Figure 3: Peak separation versus the energy of the upper level for transitions of H I (diamonds), He I (triangles) and He II (squares). The region between dashed lines is enlarged in the lower panel.
Figure 4: MAXI1659 flux-calibrated spectrum (black); dereddened spectrum, Av=1.1 mag (red); Swift-UVOT photometry (squares). The spectrum was rebinned on 5 Å  and some features were clipped in order to show the general shape of the SED. The dotted line represents fit to the de-redenned spectra with a power-law index of -1.37.
Line () EW FWHM peak-separation
       (Å) (Å) (km s) (km s)
H 3835.38 -0.98 0.09 1895 87 1175 56
H 3889.05 -1.18 0.03 2035 69 1131 26
H 3970.07 -0.70 0.09 1618 129 1131 14
H 4101.73 -1.57 0.07 1730 195 989 18
H 4340.46 -1.68 0.08 1881 62 950 52
H 4861.33 -1.55 0.07 1404 58 843 20
H 6562.80 -6.30 0.10 1567 28 918 53
P 9545.972
Pa 10049.37
Pa 10938.10 -12.40 0.5 1660 89
Pa 12818.08
Br 21655.29
He ii 4025.60 -0.666 0.12 1939 155 1062 67
He ii 4541.59 B
He ii 4685.71 -3.88 0.22 1785 26 1022 42
He ii 5411.53 1167 17
He ii 6683.20 -1.88 0.14 1537 147
He ii 8236.79
He ii 8801.419 B
He ii 9225.32 B
He i 4143.76 -0.18 0.04
He i 4471.47 B
He i 4921.93 -0.57 0.05
He i 7065.71 -0.61 0.14
He i 8750.47 B
He i 9210.05 B
He i 10829.09 -17.69 1.30 1623 22 943 8
iii/N iii 4640 -1.05 0.10 2639 158
Table 1: Parameters of spectral lines detected in the X-shooter spectrum of MAXI1659. The first column lists the identification and rest wavelength of the spectral line, second column the equivalent width, third column the full width at half maximum and the fourth column the peak separation. A line is marked with ‘B’ in case of a blend.
Line EW
(Å) (Å)
Ca ii 0.41 0.02
Ca ii 0.30 0.02
Na i 0.60 0.06
Na i 0.58 0.01
i 0.23 0.01
DIB 2.69 0.28
DIB 0.19 0.02
DIB 0.51 0.06
DIB 0.60 0.06
DIB 1.41 0.02
DIB 0.15 0.02
Table 2: Detected interstellar lines and diffuse interstellar bands with their measured equivalent width.

References

  • Barthelmy et al. (2005) Barthelmy S.D., Barbier L.M., Cummings J.R. et al. Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143 (2005).
  • Belloni et al. (2010) Belloni T.M., Muñoz-Darias T. and Kuulkers E. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2926, 1 (2010).
  • Boirin et al. (2005) Boirin L., Méndez M., Díaz Trigo M., Parmar A.N. and Kaastra J.S. A&A, 436, 195 (2005).
  • Brand and Blitz (1993) Brand J. and Blitz L. A&A, 275, 67 (1993).
  • Buxton and Vennes (2003) Buxton M. and Vennes S. MNRAS, 342, 105 (2003).
  • Buxton and Bailyn (2004) Buxton M.M. and Bailyn C.D. ApJ, 615, 880 (2004).
  • Cardelli et al. (1989) Cardelli J.A., Clayton G.C. and Mathis J.S. ApJ, 345, 245 (1989).
  • Casares et al. (2006) Casares J., Cornelisse R., Steeghs D. et al. MNRAS, 373, 1235 (2006).
  • Coriat et al. (2009) Coriat M., Corbel S., Buxton M.M. et al. MNRAS, 400, 123 (2009).
  • Cox et al. (2005) Cox N.L.J., Kaper L., Foing B.H. and Ehrenfreund P. A&A, 438, 187 (2005).
  • de Ugarte Postigo et al. (2010) de Ugarte Postigo A., Flores H., Wiersema K. et al. GRB Coordinates Network, 11307, 1 (2010).
  • Díaz Trigo et al. (2006) Díaz Trigo M., Parmar A.N., Boirin L., Méndez M. and Kaastra J.S. A&A, 445, 179 (2006).
  • Díaz Trigo et al. (2009) Díaz Trigo M., Parmar A.N., Boirin L. et al. A&A, 493, 145 (2009).
  • D’Odorico et al. (2006) D’Odorico S., Dekker H., Mazzoleni R. et al. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, volume 6269 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series (2006).
  • Dubus et al. (2001) Dubus G., Kim R.S.J., Menou K., Szkody P. and Bowen D.V. ApJ, 553, 307 (2001).
  • Frank et al. (2002) Frank J., King A. and Raine D.J. Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition (2002).
  • Goldoni et al. (2006) Goldoni P., Royer F., François P. et al. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, volume 6269 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series (2006).
  • Güver and Özel (2009) Güver T. and Özel F. MNRAS, 400, 2050 (2009).
  • Hynes (2005) Hynes R.I. ApJ, 623, 1026 (2005).
  • Hynes et al. (2003) Hynes R.I., Haswell C.A., Cui W. et al. MNRAS, 345, 292 (2003).
  • Jenniskens and Desert (1994) Jenniskens P. and Desert F.X. A&AS, 106, 39 (1994).
  • Kalamkar et al. (2011) Kalamkar M., Homan J., Altamirano D. et al. ApJ, 731, L2 (2011).
  • Kennea et al. (2011) Kennea J.A., Romano P., Mangano V. et al. ApJ, 736, 22 (2011).
  • Kuulkers et al. (2010) Kuulkers E., Ibarra A., Pollock A. et al. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2912, 1 (2010).
  • Kuulkers et al. (2011) Kuulkers E., Kouveliotou C., van der Horst A.J. et al. in press, (astro-ph/1102.2102) (2011).
  • Maloney and Begelman (1997) Maloney P.R. and Begelman M.C. ApJ, 491, L43 (1997).
  • Mangano et al. (2010) Mangano V., Hoversten E.A., Markwardt C.B. et al. GRB Coordinates Network, 11296, 1 (2010).
  • Marshall (2010) Marshall F.E. GRB Coordinates Network, 11298, 1 (2010).
  • Mathis and Cardelli (1990) Mathis J.S. and Cardelli J.A. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, volume 22 of Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 861 (1990).
  • Matsuoka et al. (2009) Matsuoka M., Kawasaki K., Ueno S. et al. PASJ, 61, 999 (2009).
  • McClintock et al. (1975) McClintock J.E., Canizares C.R. and Tarter C.B. ApJ, 198, 641 (1975).
  • Miller-Jones et al. (2011) Miller-Jones J.C.A., Madej O.K., Jonker P.G. et al. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 3358, 1 (2011).
  • Mirabel et al. (2001) Mirabel I.F., Dhawan V., Mignani R.P., Rodrigues I. and Guglielmetti F. Nature, 413, 139 (2001).
  • Modigliani et al. (2010) Modigliani A., Goldoni P., Royer F. et al. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, volume 7737 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series (2010).
  • Muñoz-Darias et al. (2011) Muñoz-Darias T., Motta S., Stiele H. and Belloni T.M. MNRAS, 415, 292 (2011).
  • Negoro et al. (2010) Negoro H., Yamaoka K., Nakahira S. et al. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2873, 1 (2010).
  • Roming et al. (2005) Roming P.W.A., Kennedy T.E., Mason K.O. et al. Space Sci. Rev., 120, 95 (2005).
  • Russell et al. (2006) Russell D.M., Fender R.P., Hynes R.I. et al. MNRAS, 371, 1334 (2006).
  • Smak (1981) Smak J. Acta Astron., 31, 395 (1981).
  • Soria et al. (2000) Soria R., Wu K. and Hunstead R.W. ApJ, 539, 445 (2000).
  • Soria et al. (1999) Soria R., Wu K. and Johnston H.M. MNRAS, 310, 71 (1999).
  • Steeghs and Casares (2002) Steeghs D. and Casares J. ApJ, 568, 273 (2002).
  • Tanaka and Lewin (1995) Tanaka Y. and Lewin W.H.G. W. H. G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, & E. P. J. van den Heuvel, (ed.) X-ray Binaries, 126–174 (1995).
  • van der Horst et al. (2010) van der Horst A.J., Granot J., Paragi Z. et al. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2874, 1 (2010).
  • van Paradijs and McClintock (1995) van Paradijs J. and McClintock J.E. W. H. G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, & E. P. J. van den Heuvel, (ed.) X-ray Binaries, 58–125 (1995).
  • Vernet et al. (2011) Vernet J., Dekker H., D’Odorico S. et al. in press (astro-ph/1110.1944) (2011).
  • Vovk et al. (2010) Vovk I., Kuulkers E., Alfonso-Garzón J. et al. The Astronomer’s Telegram, 2875, 1 (2010).
  • White and van Paradijs (1996) White N.E. and van Paradijs J. ApJ, 473, L25 (1996).
  • Wu et al. (2001) Wu K., Soria R., Hunstead R.W. and Johnston H.M. MNRAS, 320, 177 (2001).
  • Zurita et al. (2008) Zurita C., Durant M., Torres M.A.P. et al. ApJ, 681, 1458 (2008).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
212542
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description