Ultrafast dynamics of a magnetic antivortex - Micromagnetic simulations
The antivortex is a fundamental magnetization structure which is the topological counterpart of the well-known magnetic vortex. We study here the ultrafast dynamic behavior of an isolated antivortex in a patterned Permalloy thin-film element. Using micromagnetic simulations we predict that the antivortex response to an ultrashort external field pulse is characterized by the production of a new antivortex as well as of a temporary vortex, followed by an annihilation process. These processes are complementary to the recently reported response of a vortex and, like for the vortex, lead to the reversal of the orientation of the antivortex core region. In addition to its fundamental interest, this dynamic magnetization process could be used for the generation and propagation of spin waves for novel logical circuits.
Extended ferromagnetic films often display complex magnetization patterns with a rich variety of features Hubert and Schäfer (1998). This complexity can be reduced by decomposing the magnetic patterns into a few elementary magnetization structures, such as domains, domain walls or vortices. The dynamic properties of such fundamental structures have been investigated thoroughly over the last years by isolating them in patterned elements Hillebrands and Thiaville (2006). In particular, the magnetic vortex has attracted much interest Wachowiak et al. (2002); Novosad et al. (2002); Park et al. (2003); Choe et al. (2004); Van Waeyenberge et al. (2006); Hertel et al. (2007); Xiao et al. (2006). An equally fundamental, yet much less studied magnetic structure is the antivortex, the topological counterpart of the vortex. In the complex structures occurring in extended soft-magnetic films, antivortices can be found almost as frequently as ordinary vortices: they occur in cross-tie domain walls, where they are enclosed by two adjacent vortex structures Huber Jr. et al. (1958). While the in-plane magnetization distribution of an antivortex is very different from that of a vortex (see Fig. 1a), it contains, like the vortex, a tiny core Wachowiak et al. (2002) at its center in which the magnetization points perpendicular to the plane. Moreover, the two structures are related by underlying topological properties: In both cases, the local magnetization rotates by 360 on a closed loop around the core. The structures differ by their opposite sense of rotation along such a loop, which is quantified by the winding number ( for the antivortex, for the vortex)Malozemoff and Slonczewski (1979); Hertel and Schneider (2006). The winding number has been predicted to have a direct impact on the magnetization dynamics Malozemoff and Slonczewski (1979); Thiele (1973). However, not much is known to date about the dynamic properties of antivortices, even though several other fundamental magnetization structures have been analyzed in patterned thin-film elements Hillebrands and Thiaville (2006). Studies with high spatial and temporal resolution have demonstrated that domains, domain walls and vortices exhibit different excitation spectra Raabe et al. (2005); Park et al. (2003). Such investigations have mostly focussed on small perturbations and on reversible changes in these structures produced by an external field Wang and Campbell (2007); Kuepper et al. (2007). However, in a recent study on cross-tie walls, Neudert et al. Neudert et al. (2007) have reported the creation of new cross-ties, i.e., of vortex-antivortex pairs, in response to high-frequency magnetic fields. Also the field-pulse induced reversal of vortex cores has been found to be characterized by the creation of a vortex-antivortex pair Hertel et al. (2007); Van Waeyenberge et al. (2006); Xiao et al. (2006). During this core switch, a transient cross-tie structure dissolves within a few tens of ps via an annihilation process Lee et al. (2005a); Hertel and Schneider (2006). Using fully three-dimensional micromagnetic simulations we study here the ultrafast dynamic response of a single magnetic antivortex in response to external field pulses a few tens of ps long. We find that a rapid series of pair creation and annihilation processes occurs, which is complementary to the one observed in a vortex Hertel et al. (2007) and which leads to the reversal of the antivortex core. This represents a new fundamental process in magnetism on the nanoscale. The spin-wave bursts resulting from the annihilation process make the antivortex structure a possible source for spin-waves to be used in novel logical circuits Hertel et al. (2004).
Unlike vortices, it is rather difficult to isolate an antivortex, i.e.,
to prepare a nanostructure that contains only a single antivortex.
This has been achieved by Shigeto et
al. using thin-film elements consisting of four connected rings
Shigeto et al. (2002), where an antivortex was observed at the ring junction.
Here we use a sample with a shape corresponding to the connecting
part of four adjacent rings to stabilize an isolated antivortex (shown in
Fig. 1b). The sample is constructed from four
circular segments with 200 nm radius. The four short stretching strips
are 40 nm wide, and the thickness is 20 nm. The in-plane shape
anisotropy of this particular geometry can sustain an antivortex due
to the tendency of the magnetization to align with the sample
boundaries. The simulations have been performed with the micromagnetic
finite-element code that we have used previously, e.g., in
Ref. Hertel et al. (2007).
The antivortex structure was obtained by selecting a suitable
initial magnetic configuration and letting the structure relax
The antivortex structure was perturbed by a short in-plane Gaussian-shaped pulse applied in the direction. In the case shown in Fig. 1, the pulse had a maximum intensity of 60 mT and a duration of ps. Fig. 1c-j shows the magnetization dynamics in response to the applied field pulse. In the top row (c-f), the in-plane magnetic structure is shown. The same structure is also shown in the bottom row (g-j), but the colors there represent the perpendicular component of the magnetization () and the crossing point of the isosurfaces helps display the position of the antivortex core. Following the application of the field pulse, the antivortex is displaced from its equilibrium position and the in-plane magnetization of the sample is distorted (d). In a region close to the core, this distortion leads to the formation of a “dip” in which the magnetization rotates out of the plane in the direction opposite to the antivortex core (h). The formation of such a dip in the case of an antivortex is analogous to the recently reported dip formation near a distorted vortex core Hertel et al. (2007); Novosad et al. (2005); Kasai et al. (2006). Its direction is determined by the stray field of the antivortex core Hertel et al. (2007). Approximately 80 ps after the pulse maximum, a new antivortex is emitted from the original antivortex (e). However, according to the Poincaré-Hopf index theorem of vector fields, the total winding number of the magnetization in a thin-film element is a topological invariant, and the the formation of a single antivortex would violate its conservation. A new vortex is thus also produced, which is located between the two antivortex structures. The newly formed antivortex-vortex pair is made clearly visible by the two additional intersections of the isosurfaces (i). This strongly inhomogeneous structure is eventually resolved through the annihilation of the initial antivortex with the newly created vortex, whose cores have opposite orientation Hertel and Schneider (2006). This results in a sudden reduction of the local exchange energy density and leaves behind the newly formed antivortex with oppositely magnetized core (f, j).
The production of an antivortex-vortex pair from an antivortex structure is a
previously unreported micromagnetic process. The resulting
transient magnetic configuration could be called an anti cross-tie wall,
i.e. a single vortex enclosed by two antivortices, which has never
been observed in a stable magnetic structure.
It is also remarkable that, in spite of the very different magnetic in-plane
structure of vortices and antivortices, their ultrafast dynamics are
analogous, involving the creation of new magnetic structures followed by a
Here, the strength of the isosurface representation is obvious: it
captures the main features of the processes unfolding
in both vortex and antivortex structures
In the case shown in Fig. 1, the system eventually relaxes
back to an antivortex structure.
However, the stability of an isolated antivortex is rather weak
compared to that of a vortex. This is due to the magnetic flux, which in an
antivortex has a saddle-point configuration while a (energetically
favorable) closed flux is obtained around an ordinary vortex. The
magnetic configuration in the sample we have used
leads in fact to the formation of magnetic surface and volume charges,
which reduce the stability of the antivortex
The introduction of a vortex in the sample affects the dynamics of the antivortex and thus also the final equilibrium structure. The different possible final states are shown in Fig. 3 as a function of the applied pulse’s strength and duration. It indicates that while it is rather difficult to isolate an antivortex, it is pretty easy to dissolve it. Starting with low and short field pulses, there is a set of parameters for which the system is slightly excited, causing the antivortex core to rotate about its equlibrium position (region A in Fig. 3). The modes excited by such low field-pulses have been investigated in Ref. Wang and Campbell (2007). When pair production and, consequently, a core switch is induced, the studied system relaxes into an antivortex configuration only for a rather narrow set of field pulse parameters (region B). For stronger or longer pulses, vortex nucleation occurs concurrently to the antivortex core switch, as shown in Fig. 2. The vortex can then migrate through the sample, leading to the expulsion of the antivortex after a few ns (region C). In region D (for pulses above 60 mT), the pulse is sufficiently strong to induce the production of new pairs originating from both the antivortex and the nucleated vortex. The result is the generation of a transient state containing multiple cross-ties. A series of annihilations Lee et al. (2005b, a); Hertel and Schneider (2006) occurs within a few ten ns, leading to a a final magnetic configuration consisting only of a pair of head-to-head and tail-to-tail domain walls.
The annihilation of a vortex and an antivortex with opposite core magnetization has been shown to be connected with the emission of spin-wave bursts in the GHz range Lee et al. (2005a); Hertel and Schneider (2006). It has therefore been suggested that the core switch mechanism of a vortex could be used to inject spin waves into a strip acting as a waveguide Choi et al. (2007). The spin waves could then be processed in logical circuits Hertel et al. (2004). In this context, the antivortex structure could equally be used as a spin-wave source. If its stability can be increased, an antivortex would probably be more suitable than a vortex for this purpose: When a disk-shaped source is used (in the case of the vortex core switch) a 90Néel wall is inevitably present between the source and the strip along which the waves propagate. Such domain walls have been reported to have unfavorable properties concerning spin wave propagation, mostly reflecting the spin waves Buess et al. (2006). In contrast, as shown in Fig. 4, the spin waves produced in the antivortex can propagate unhindered into a branch, which naturally extends the magnetic configuration of the astroid-like sample. All branches can be extended to connect to other astroid-like elements. Such a network could constitute an antidot array Heyderman et al. (2007) and provide a regular lattice of antivortices.
What does the study of antivortex dynamics lead to? First, the complex and ultrafast modifications that an antivortex can undergo by applying a short field pulse are of fundamental interest. A short field pulse can be used to switch the core of an antivortex. This occurs through the rapid creation of a new antivortex and the annihilation of the original one with a short-lived vortex. Second, we find that the static topological complementarity of vortices and antivortices is equally exhibited in their dynamical behavior. The dynamics of antivortices deserves further investigation since it likely plays an equally important role as the dynamics of vortices in the case of pulse-induced cross-tie domain-wall transformations Neudert et al. (2007). In this context it will be necessary to determine whether the pair-creation reported in Ref. Neudert et al. (2007) is directly due to the dynamics described above, since larger distances of a few hundreds of nm are involved in cross-tie walls. Third, the annihilation of transient magnetic structures during the antivortex core switching process could be used, e.g., for generating spin-waves for logical circuits Hertel et al. (2004).
- The antivortex structure is not the only stable magnetization state here. Using dynamic relaxation methods, we have equally observed the formation of a metastable vortex state and a state containing two domain walls.
- The isosurface representation of the antivortex core switching is almost identical to the isosurface representation of the vortex core switching, cf. Fig. 2 of Ref. Hertel et al. (2007)
- S. Gliga, R. Hertel and C. M. Schneider (unpublished).
- The isosurfaces are perpendicular to the sample edges, which is a result of the Brown boundary condition , where is the unit vector normal to the surface . The magnetization gradient is therefore non-vanishing only along a direction parallel to the sample edges. As isosurfaces and gradient lines are perpendicular to each other, the and isosurfaces are always perpendicular to the sample edges.
- A. Hubert and R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains - The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Berlin, New York, Heidelberg: Springer, 1998).
- B. Hillebrands and A. Thiaville, eds., Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures III, vol. 101 of Topics in Applied Physics (Springer, 2006).
- A. Wachowiak, J. Wiebe, M. Bode, O. Pietzsch, M. Morgenstern, and R. Wiesendanger, Science 298, 577 (2002).
- V. Novosad, M. Grimsditch, K. Y. Guslienko, P. Vavassori, Y. Otani, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B 66, 052407 (2002).
- J. P. Park, P. Eames, D. M. Engebretson, J. Berezovsky, and P. A. Crowell, Phys. Rev. B 67, 020403(R) (2003).
- S. B. Choe, Y. Acremann, A. Scholl, A. Bauer, A. Doran, J. Stohr, and H. A. Padmore, Science 304, 420 (2004).
- B. Van Waeyenberge, A. Puzic, H. Stoll, K. W. Chou, T. Tyliszczak, R. Hertel, M. Fähnle, H. Brückl, K. Rott, G. Reiss, et al., Nature 444, 461 (2006).
- R. Hertel, S. Gliga, M. Fähnle, and C. M. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117201 (2007).
- Q. F. Xiao, J. Rudge, B. C. Choi, Y. K. Hong, and G. Donohoe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 262507 (2006).
- E. E. Huber Jr., D. O. Smith, and J. B. Goodenough, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 294 (1958).
- A. P. Malozemoff and J. C. Slonczewski, Magnetic Domain Walls in Bubble Materials (Academic Press, New York, 1979).
- R. Hertel and C. M. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177202 (2006).
- A. A. Thiele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230 (1973).
- J. Raabe, C. Quitmann, C. H. Back, F. Nolting, S. Johnson, and C. Buehler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 217204 (2005).
- H. Wang and C. E. Campbell, Phys. Rev. B 76, 220407(R) (2007).
- K. Kuepper, M. Buess, J. Raabe, C. Quitmann, and J. Fassbender, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 167202 (2007).
- A. Neudert, J. McCord, R. Schäfer, and L. Schultz, Phys. Rev. B 75, 172404 (2007).
- K.-S. Lee, S. Choi, and S.-K. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 192502 (2005a).
- R. Hertel, W. Wulfhekel, and J. Kirschner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257202 (2004).
- K. Shigeto, T. Okuno, K. Mibu, and T. Shinjo, T.Ono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4190 (2002).
- J. O. Rantschler, P. J. Chen, A. S. Arrott, R. D. McMichael, W. F. Egelhoff, and B. B. Maranville, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10J113 (2005).
- V. Novosad, F. Y. Fradin, P. E. Roy, K. S. Buchanan, K. Y. Guslienko, and S. Bader, Phys. Rev. B 72, 024455 (2005).
- S. Kasai, Y. Nakatani, K. Kobayashi, H. Kohno, and T. Ono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 107204 (2006).
- K.-S. Lee, B.-W. Kang, Y.-S. Yu, and S.-K. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1568 (2005b).
- S. Choi, K.-S. Lee, K. Y. Guslienko, and S.-K. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 087205 (2007).
- M. Buess, J. Raabe, K. Perzlmaier, C. H. Back, and C. Quitmann, Phys. Rev. B 74, 100404(R) (2006).
- L. J. Heyderman, S. Czekaj, F. Nolting, D.-H. Kim, and P. Fischer, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316, 99 (2007).