Two-species boson mixture on a ring: a group theoretic approach to the quantum dynamics of low-energy excitations

Two-species boson mixture on a ring: a group theoretic approach to the quantum dynamics of low-energy excitations

Vittorio Penna    Andrea Richaud Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia and u.d.r. CNISM, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Torino, Italy
July 6, 2019

We investigate the weak excitations of a system made up of two condensates trapped in a Bose-Hubbard ring and coupled by an interspecies repulsive interaction. Our approach, based on the Bogoliubov approximation scheme, shows that one can reduce the problem Hamiltonian to the sum of sub-Hamiltonians , each one associated to momentum modes . Each is then recognized to be an element of a dynamical algebra. This uncommon and remarkable property allows us to present a straightforward diagonalization scheme, to find constants of motion, to highlight the significant microscopic processes, and to compute their time evolution. The proposed solution scheme is applied to a simple but non trivial closed circuit, the trimer. The dynamics of low-energy excitations, corresponding to weakly-populated vortices, is investigated considering different choices of the initial conditions, and the angular-momentum transfer between the two condensates is evidenced. Finally, the condition for which the spectral collapse and dynamical instability are observed is derived analytically.

I Introduction

Bosonic mixtures formed by two atomic species have proved to be a fertile ground for investigating the complex interplay of the density-density interspecies interaction with the interactions among bosons of the same species, boson hopping, and interspecies population imbalance. Trapped in optical lattices where the space fragmentation emphasizes the quantum nature of microscopic processes, mixtures have revealed an extraordinarily rich scenario of new exotic quantum phases, dynamical behaviors and properties. These include, for example, unprecedented Mott-like states and types of superfluidity mix1 ()-mix3 (), glassy phases mix4 (), interspecies coherence mix5 (), spatial separation or coexistence of different phases mix6 (), mix7 (), and polaron-like excitations mix8 (). Dynamical properties have also been explored within the mean-field picture and a variety of aspects has been considered which range from the dynamical stability of binary mixtures dmix0 (), different types of self-trapping solutions dmix1 (), and the effectiveness of the space-mode description in the Gross-Pitaevskii picture dmix2 (), to the dynamics of the Rabi-Josephson regime dmix3 (), and quantum many-body correlations dmix4 (). More recent work has been focused on the interspecies coherent transfer of superfluid vortices dyn1 (), the analytic description of spectral collapse dyn2 () and the miscibility of a two-component mixture dyn3 (). Mixtures, well described within the Bose-Hubbard (BH) picture mix9 (), mix10 (), have been realized by means of either two atomic species mix11 () or the same species in two different internal states mix12 ().

While dynamical aspects of mixtures have been mainly studied through the mean-field approach and in the simple geometry of a double-well potential dmix0 ()-dyn3 (), minor attention has been devoted to extended arrays of wells and the use of techniques better incorporating the deep quantum character of such systems. In this article, using the method applied to the dynamics of bosons in a two-ring ladder Noi (), we analyze the low-energy excitations in a two-component bosonic mixture described within the BH picture and confined on ring lattice. The ring geometry, designed more than ten years ago in am1ring (), has recently raised a lot of interest in the study of atomtronic devices am2ring (), am3ring () and its feasibility has been proved to be within the reach of current experimental techniques.

We focus on the regime where both condensed species are superfluid and uniformly distributed in the ring lattice. This allows us to reduce the system Hamiltonian to an effective quantum model derived by means of the Bogoliubov approximation, which well describes the low-energy excitations in the uniform-density regime. After observing that the original Hamiltonian decouples into many sub-Hamiltonians (involving pairs of opposite-momentum modes), we apply a well-established group-theoretic procedure based on the identification of the dynamical algebra of a system MR (), ZFG (). In fact, we recognize that the dynamical algebra of each sub-Hamiltonian is so(2,3). This important property provides a viable, fully-analytic diagonalization scheme, allows one to find conserved quantities and highlights the most important microscopic processes that underlie the dynamical evolution of the system.

We apply this quite general solution scheme to a three-site BH model (trimer) with a ring geometry to find the energy spectrum of low-energy excitations as a function of the model parameters and the Heisenberg equations governing the dynamics of the system. Then, we study the trimer-excitation dynamics for different values of Hamiltonian parameters and initial conditions relevant to simple but significant rotational states. Interestingly, we observe that angular momentum can indeed be transferred between the two condensed species and we point out the condition under which this phenomenon occurs. Finally, we focus our attention on the stability of the system and derive the analytic parameter-dependent formula giving the critical condition at which the energy-spectrum collapse takes place and the system turns unstable. This circumstance can reveal the presence of a phase transition, an important point that will be studied in a future article.

Our work is organized as follows: in Section II we introduce the model and, by implementing the Bogoliubov approximation, we reduce it to a form charaterized by a well-defined dynamical algebra. The derivation of the excitations spectrum and of the Heisenberg equations is described in Section III. In Section IV we apply the dynamical-algebra method to the trimer and investigate the dynamics of boson populations in various regimes. Section V includes the stability analysis and, finally, Section VI is devoted to concluding remarks.

Ii Ring-mixture Hamiltonian and dynamical algebra approach

The Hamiltonian describing a mixture of two condensates loaded in a ring lattice and coupled by an interspecies repulsive term is described, in the formalism of second-quantization, by


where and represent the hopping amplitudes, and the intra-species repulsive interactions, and is the inter-species repulsion. and are standard bosonic operators, featuring the commutators , and . The particle number and is conserved in both condensates. and are number operators and is the site number in the ring lattice.

By assuming () sufficiently larger than () in order to avoid the emergence of Mott-insulator states, the condition that is sufficiently smaller than , implies that the mixture ground state is a superfluid in which the two components are completely mixed and delocalized (see, for example, mix6 ()) with local populations and . As is well known, this uniform boson distribution entails macroscopically-occupied zero-momentum modes for both species within the momentum-mode picture and suggests the application of the Bogoliubov approximation. In order to properly enact it, we take advantage of the ring-structure of the system, and move to momentum-mode basis. Momentum-mode operators, and , are defined in terms of site-modes operators

with and . Parameter is the lattice constant, is the ring length, () is the number of atoms of atomic species A (B) and the summations are restricted to the first Brillouin zone. Momentum-mode operators and are also characterized by standard bosonic commutators , and . In view of the ring geometry, the number of bosons having (angular) momentum equal to is associated to number operators and . In the momentum-mode picture, the Hamiltonian can be recast into the form

If the system is in the superfluid phase (, large enough) and both species are uniformly distributed in the lattice (small excludes spatial phase separation), both atomic species are characterized by a macroscopically occupied momentum mode, namely , and the Bogoliubov procedure Rey (); Burnett () can be easily enacted (details are given in the Supplemental Material). The resulting Hamiltonian


can be written as the sum of a constant term , and decoupled Hamiltonians , each one involving just one pair of (opposite) momentum modes,




Note that operators (with ) are simply given by , while we define

with , to lighten the notation.

An essential feature of Hamiltonian (3) is that the set of two-mode operators is closed under commutation. The recognition of this set, the so-called dynamical algebra MR (); ZFG (), is particularly advantageous for computing the conserved physical quantities, for a straightforward diagonalization of Hamiltonian and for deriving the Heisenberg equations of the system. As regards our problem, the dynamical algebra generated by is so(2,3). Its characteristic commutators and details on the dynamical-algebra method can be found in Noi ().

Interestingly, the same algebra was found to feature the completely different model of a single condensate trapped in a two-ring ladder Noi (). In that model, terms described the angular-momentum transfer between two coupled rings via tunnelling effect. In the present model, in addition to terms , the new operators appear which describe creation and destruction processes that were absent in the two-ring model. This difference comes from the inter-species coupling term of model (1) which replaces the inter-ring tunneling term of the two-ring model Noi ().

Concluding, we note that this approach is valid also in the case , describing attractive interactions among bosons of the same species, provided that i) the ratio () is sufficiently large, in order to guarantee a superfluid phase, and ii) the ratio is small enough to determine uniform boson distributions Jack () apt to apply the Bogoliubov scheme.

Iii Diagonalization of the model

In order to diagonalize our model, we choose the set as a basis of the Hilbert space of states associated to sub-Hamiltonian . The four quantum numbers and which label a basis vector, correspond to the numbers of bosons endowed with angular momentum in either the condensed species. Since the numbers of particles in the two species are conserved, the number of bosons in momentum modes (modes that have been made semiclassical) are

iii.1 Energy eigenstates and eigenvalues

The information that a Hamiltonian belongs to a certain dynamical algebra allows one to calculate its spectrum in a straightforward way. In general, one can exploit the algebra structure to numerically diagonalize the Hamiltonian. In the particular but significant case where and , the diagonalization process is fully analytic, and sub-Hamiltonian

can be put in diagonal form by making use of a unitary transformation belonging to group SO(2,3)

A proper choice of angles , and , allows one to get rid of those operators which are not diagonal in the Fock-states basis. By choosing


one obtains the diagonal Hamiltonian


in which operators and are linear combinations of number operators (see formulas (4)), and thus are diagonal in the Fock-states basis. Since , then the energy spectrum of takes the form


where in , is an integer index, and


are characteristic frequencies associated to each Hamiltonian together with quantum numbers and .

iii.2 Time-evolution of physical observables and microscopic processes

The knowledge of the dynamical algebra of the Hamiltonian allows one to represent it as a linear combination of algebra generators . For our model these coincide with the two-mode operators of the set . Thanks to the characteristic commutators of the algebra, the Heisenberg equation of any is readily found to be


Then, the time evolution of any observable of the form is easily determined within the algebra. For example, from eq. (10) one easily discovers that operator (the angular momentum of bosons populating the modes ) is constant of motion. Another example concerns the number of bosons with angular momentum (proportional to) , whose equation is


This equation shows how the time evolution of depends on and implicitly defines two generalized currents of boson-pairs whose distinctive trait is to flow from the macroscopic modes and Nota_correnti () to the excited modes and . Remarkably, while the intraspecies repulsive interaction accounts for the creation of opposite-momentum boson pairs within the same atomic species through the terms and , the interspecies coupling causes the formation of opposite-momentum boson pairs in a twisted fashion (i.e. one boson in an atomic species and one in the other) through the terms . We remark that this second process is due to operators which were absent in the two-ring model Noi (). Some of these microscopic processes are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: Some important microscopic processes that occur in the mixture. Blue and red colors are used to distinguish the two species. Faded colors denote particles that belong to the two macroscopic modes, and , that have been made semiclassic. Left panel: determines the creation and annihilation of excited boson-pairs within the same species. Right panel: determines the creation and annihilation of twisted boson-pairs (left side) and is responsible for scattering processes between particles of different species (right side).

Another application of formula (10) consists in computing the dynamical equations of finer-grained observables such as the single-mode number operators and related to excited modes. To this end one must consider the enlarged dynamical algebra so(2,4) (including so(2,3)) in which and can be seen as algebra generators. The so(2,4) generators and further details are given in the Supplemental Material and in Noi (). For the excited-mode number operator , one finds


A similar equation holds for operators in which operators and are exchanged. This equation clearly shows that a time variation of is caused both by intraspecies () and by interspecies () interaction processes. Such processes are depicted in Fig. 1.

Iv Dynamics on a ring trimer

The theory and the formulas we have discussed so far are valid for a ring having an arbitrary site number . In the present section, we investigate the simple model with , the so-called ring trimer. This particular geometry has been thoroughly analyzed in the last decade, because of the rich scenario of nonlinear phenomena triggered by the non-integrable character of a system featuring three spatial modes Buonsante ()-JJ1 (). In the trimer case takes just three values, namely, , and (whose relevant momentum mode will be made semiclassical in the Bogoliubov picture). Therefore, the only sub-Hamiltonian is (see (3)), associated to parameter

To diagonalize , the proper choice of generalized angles is , and which gives with the two characteristic frequencies


The energy eigenvalues then read


where . The good agreement of eigenvalues (15) with the spectrum calculated numerically is illustrated in the Supplemental Material.

The frequencies (13) and (14), and the expressions of angles and are correctly defined only in a portion of the three-dimensional parameter space . This region of the parameter space, where the spectrum is discrete, classically corresponds to the region where the system exhibits a stable dynamics. At the border of such stability region, the energy cost to create excitations tends to zero and the system manifest unstable behaviors. From the point of view of the dynamics, in fact, one can observe the divergence of many physical observables. This aspect will be resumed in Section V.

iv.1 Time evolution of excitations

In the same spirit of reference Noi (), it is possible to describe the dynamics of the momentum mode operators in terms of their expectation values. The latter are represented by the four (complex) order parameters

Figure 2: Dynamics of excitations for , and (upper panels) and (lower panels), with , , and . Left (right) panel concerns atomic species A (B). Red dashed (blue) color corresponds to bosons with (). The fact that features a maximum when is zero and vice-versa entails the periodic and complete AM transfer between the two species. Increasing strongly changes the time scale of population oscillations.

Over the remainder of this subsection, we will show that one can trigger different dynamical regimes by performing different choices both for the initial state (i.e. the complex order parameter at ), and for the Hamiltonian parameters , , and . The plots that we present below correspond to the analytic solutions of the dynamical equations (12) for the excited populations and for four different choices of initial conditions. Note that the excitation of angular-momentum modes corresponds to excite weakly-populated vortices.

(1) Absence of excitations at . Although, at the beginning of the dynamics, none of the condensates feature any excitation, the presence of interactions and causes the periodic formation of excited bosons within the mixture, according to the formula

In other words, the fact that interactions and are non zero causes fluctuations in the vacuum state .

Figure 3: Dynamics of excitations for , , and , , , and . Left (right) panels concern species A (B). Red dashed (blue) color is used to depict and ( and ). Upper panels: for an initial phase difference the system features a trivial dynamics, entailing that the inter-species AM transfer is suppressed. Lower panels: Conversely, the periodic AM transfer is active if is non-zero (e.g. equal to ).

(2) Vortex-like excitation in condensate A, no excitations in condensate B. If, at time , one of the two atomic species exhibits a non-zero population (e.g. , namely a vortex excitation with ), one observes, apart form minor quantum fluctuations (the high-frequency ripple in the figure), a periodic transfer of angular momentum (AM) between the two atomic species. This effect is illustrated in Fig. 2 for (upper panels) and (lower panels). Of course, this case is equivalent to the case with condensate B excited and condensate A unexcited at .

The relevance of the inter-species parameter on the population dynamics is highlighted in the lower panels of Fig. 2: Increasing clearly shows how the periodic collapse and revival of populations , is replaced by an essentially regular oscillation while the oscillation of , as well as the AM transfer take place on a much smaller time scale. The same periodic AM transfer is also observed when, in addition to a vortex, the initial configuration includes an anti-vortex in the same species.

Figure 4: Upper panels: Dynamics of excitations for , and , , , and . The left (right) panel concerns species A (B). Red dashed (blue) color corresponds to bosons with (). Note, up to quantum fluctuations (high frequency ripple), the periodic and complete transfer of excitations between the two species. Lower left panel: for the frequency of oscillations increases (the color code is the same as in the upper panels). Right lower panel: Gray (dashed black) lines describes the time evolution of the inter-species AM difference for ().

(3) Vortex in condensate A and equal vortex in condensate B. Let us assume that, at , species A exhibits a weakly-populated vortex while an equal vortex is present in species B. This is an interesting situation, because different initial phase differences can trigger different dynamical regimes. Namely, if the complex quantities and are in phase at , the two condensates seem to be decoupled and just feature quantum fluctuations (upper panels of Fig. 3). Conversely, an initial non-zero phase difference makes it possible a periodic AM exchange between the two condensates (lower panels of Fig. 3). Once more, we note that the same dynamics is observed by exchanging A and B at .

(4) Vortex excitation in condensate A, and equal anti-vortex in condensate B. Finally, let us consider the case where a weakly-populated vortex of species A () is superimposed to an equal but counter-propagating anti-vortex of species B (). It turns out that the two kinds of excitations are periodically transferred from a species to the other (see upper panels of Fig. 4). The left lower panel of Fig. 4 confirms the relevance of parameter : As discussed in the case (2), increasing implies that the population oscillations and the AM transfer take place on a much smaller time scale. In particular, the right lower panel of Fig. 4 illustrates the AM transfer through the quantity where the signs in front of the mode population takes into account the clockwise (or anti-clockwise) rotations of bosons.

It is important to note that the equation governing the dynamics of the AM transfer in the cases -

clearly shows how the microscopic processes involved by operators and both contribute to activate the AM transfer. This circumstance is due to the fact that, unlike the two-ring ladder model, where the transfer is controlled by the inter-ring tunneling, in the current model the transfer is triggered by the inter-species interaction.

V Towards dynamical instability

In this section we resume the discussion on the diagonalization procedure of Section III and comment on the stability of the system. One can observe that the angles associated to generalized rotations, and , (see Equations (5)) are subject to some constraints. The same constrains can also be found in relation to the diagonal Hamiltonian (6), i.e., in the expressions of characteristic frequencies (8) and (9). Recalling that , and have been assumed to be non-negative, all the dynamical results and the solution scheme that we have discussed up to now are valid provided that


When approaches this upper limiting value, the energy spectrum collapses, i.e., the energy difference between two adjacent energy levels tends to vanish (Fig. 5 well illustrates the collapse).

Figure 5: Energy levels vs interspecies interaction for a trimer. If the two atomic species do not interact (), the two characteristic frequencies and coincide. When approaches the limiting value , one can observe the collapse of the energy spectrum relevant to the second generalized harmonic oscillator. Parameters , , have been chosen.

As a consequence, each is associated to a specific limiting value for , namely . Recalling that is an increasing function in the interval , the global limiting value is always found at the smallest momentum, i.e., for , irrespective of site number . In other words, increasing , the sub-Hamiltonian which could first be affected by the spectral collapse is , no matter the number of ring-lattice sites .

Figure 6: Time evolution of populations for , , , , , and . Notice that is close to the critical value , i.e. . and are depicted in red, while and are represented in blue. All the excited boson populations quickly grow and soon get unphysical.

With reference to the most elementary closed circuit, the trimer, the stability condition becomes


(namely, in terms of the model parameters) which guarantees the correctness of formulas (13), (14) and (15). As far as excited populations, they reveal a diverging evolution when one approaches the border of the stability region. Fig. 6 clearly depicts this situation. In view of this, the inequality (17) is particularly significant in that, in addition to setting the limits of validity for our model, it can be seen as the hallmark of a dynamical phase transition Jack (), VP (). Finally, we note how the more general inequality (16) reproduces, for a generic ring lattice, the spectral-collapse conditions related to the demixing effect for a mixture in a 2-well potential spect ().

Vi Concluding remarks

We have studied the weak excitations of a two-species bosonic mixture confined in a BH ring. In Section II we proved that, after enacting the well-known Bogoliubov procedure, the model Hamiltonian reduces to the sum of independent sub-Hamiltonians related to pairs of (opposite) momenta. In particular, we showed that each belongs to a specific dynamical algebra, the algebra so(2,3). Thanks to the knowledge of the dynamical algebra, in Section III, we diagonalized the effective Hamiltonian, determined the energy spectrum, computed the Heisenberg equations for various physical observables, and highlighted microscopic processes characterizing the mixture.

In Section IV, we applied the proposed solution scheme to the simple but non trivial three-well ring, the BH trimer, featuring as macroscopically occupied momentum mode. The corresponding energy spectrum was determined and shown to provide the two frequencies that characterize the trimer dynamics. We computed the time evolution of excited populations for different choices of the model parameters and different values of initial conditions. More specifically, we pointed out the presence of fluctuations in the vacuum-state, the possible coherent periodic transfer of angular momentum between the two species and its relation with their initial phase difference. Also, we emphasized the influence of the interspecies interaction on the population dynamics by comparing the population oscillations in the case when is smaller than and when . We showed that increasing makes the AM transfer faster.

As a conclusion, in Section V, we identified the region where the system is stable, and observed that, for , the system approaches instability, a possible signature of the mixing-demixing phase transition spect (). This issue, the analysis of attractive interactions and of strong interspecies repulsions, will be considered in a future work.


  • (1) A.B. Kuklov and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 100401 (2003).
  • (2) E. Altman, W. Hofstetter, E. Demler and M. D. Lukin, New J. Phys. 5, 113 (2003).
  • (3) A. Isacsson, M. C. Cha, K. Sengupta and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. B 72, 184507 (2005).
  • (4) T. Roscilde and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190402 (2007).
  • (5) P. Buonsante, S. M. Giampaolo, F. Illuminati, V. Penna, and A. Vezzani Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 240402 (2008).
  • (6) F. Lingua, M. Guglielmino, V. Penna and B. Capogrosso Sansone, Phys. Rev. A 92, 053610 (2015).
  • (7) K. Suthar, and D. Angom, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063608 (2016).
  • (8) D. Benjamin and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033615 (2014).
  • (9) X. Q. Xu, L. H. Lu and Y. Q. Li, Phys. Rev. A 78, 043609 (2008).
  • (10) I. I. Satija, R. Balakrishnan, P. Naudus, J. Heward, M. Edwards, and C.W. Clark, Phys. Rev. A 79, 033616 (2009).
  • (11) G. Mazzarella, M. Moratti, L. Salasnich, M. Salerno and F. Toigo, J. Phys. B 42, 125301 (2009).
  • (12) G. Mazzarella, M. Moratti, L. Salasnich, and F. Toigo, J. Phys. B 43, 065303 (2010).
  • (13) P. Mujal, B. Julía-Díaz, and A. Polls, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043619 (2016).
  • (14) A. Gallemí, M. Mateo, R. Mayol and M. Guilleumas, New J. Phys. 18, 015003 (2015).
  • (15) F. Lingua, G. Mazzarella, and V. Penna, J. Phys. B 49, 205005 (2016).
  • (16) K. L. Lee, N. B. Jørgensen, I. Kang Liu, L. Wacker, J. J. Arlt, N. P. Proukakis, Phys. Rev. A 94, 013602 (2016).
  • (17) H. A. Gersch and G. C. Knollman, Phys. Rev. 129, 959 (1963).
  • (18) M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
  • (19) J. Catani, L. De Sarlo, G. Barontini, F. Minardi and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. A 77, 011603(R) (2008).
  • (20) B. Gadway, D. Pertot, R. Reimann and D. Schneble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 045303, (2010).
  • (21) A. Richaud and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. A 96, 013620 (2017).
  • (22) L. Amico, A. Osterloh, and F. Cataliotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 063201 (2005).
  • (23) D. Aghamalyan, L. Amico, and L. C. Kwek, Phys. Rev. A 88, 063627 (2013).
  • (24) L. Amico, D. Aghamalyan, F. Auksztol, H. Crepaz, R. Dumke, L. C. Kwek, Sci. Rep. 4, 4298 (2014).
  • (25) M. Rasetti, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 13, 425 (1975).
  • (26) W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867 (1990).
  • (27) A. M. Rey, K. Burnett, R. Roth, M. Edwards, C. J. Williams and C. W. Clark, J. Phys. B 36, 825 (2003).
  • (28) K. Burnett, M. Edwards, C. W. Clark, and M. Shotter, J. Phys. B 35, 1671 (2002).
  • (29) M. W. Jack and M. Yamashita, Phys. Rev. A 71, 023610 (2005).
  • (30) One should remember that, in the Bogoliubov scheme, and have been incorporated in the effective interaction strengths , in terms of the parameters and .
  • (31) P. Buonsante, V. Penna and A. Vezzani, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043615 (2010).
  • (32) P. J. Jason, M. Johansson, and K. Kirr, Phys. Rev. E 86, 016214 (2012).
  • (33) G. Arwas, A. Vardi, and D. Cohen, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015).
  • (34) X. Han and B. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023621 (2016).
  • (35) P. J. Jason and M. Johansson, Phys. Rev. E 94, 052215 (2016).
  • (36) V. Penna, Phys. Rev. E 87, 052909 (2013).
  • (37) F. Lingua and V. Penna, Phys. Rev. E 95, 062142 (2017).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description