Twodimensional localized structures in harmonically forced oscillatory systems
Abstract
Twodimensional spatially localized structures in the complex GinzburgLandau equation with 1:1 resonance are studied near the simultaneous occurrence of a steady front between two spatially homogeneous equilibria and a supercritical Turing bifurcation on one of them. The bifurcation structures of steady circular fronts and localized target patterns are computed in the Turingstable and Turingunstable regimes. In particular, localized target patterns grow along the solution branch via ring insertion at the core in a process reminiscent of defectmediated snaking in one spatial dimension. Axisymmetric oscillons on these solution branches are found to be stable over a wide parameter interval, and subject to various types of instability otherwise. Direct numerical simulations reveal novel depinning dynamics of localized target patterns in the radial direction, and of circular and planar localized hexagonal patterns in the fully twodimensional system.
keywords:
oscillons, localized patterns, forced complex GinzburgLandau equation, snaking.1 Introduction
For several decades, twodimensional (2D) localized structures have been a frequent subject of experimental, numerical and analytical studies PuBoAm10 . A particularly interesting class of localized structures, known as localized states (LS), results from the coexistence of two stationary states, either of which can fill the entire spatial domain K:08 . These states may take the form of spatially homogeneous equilibria or spatially periodic patterns. A stable pattern can be created from an equilibrium by the Turing instability, which can be either supercritical or subcritical. In the supercritical case, since the equilibrium is unstable while the pattern is stable, the latter invades the former via a pulled front and thus no steady LS are expected vS03 ; Ref. CsMi99 describes the invasion of a homogeneous state by a hexagonal pattern of this type. In the subcritical case, and the pattern can both be stable and the front between them (known as a pushed front) may remain pinned to the pattern over a range of parameter values Pom:86 ; JPMDB94 . This pinning mechanism underlies much recent work on both 1D and 2D LS, notably in the quadraticcubic SwiftHohenberg equation (SH23). The bifurcation structures and temporal dynamics of 1D LS in SH23 are now well understood BuKn:06 : stationary reflectionsymmetric LS are located on a pair of intertwined branches, one of which corresponds to states with maxima in the center and the other to states with minima in the center. As one proceeds along either branch these states grow in length via the repeated nucleation of a pair of wavelengths, one on either side of the LS, in a process reflected in the backandforth oscillations of the branches and referred to as standard homoclinic snaking. The two LS branches are in addition interconnected by an infinite number of crosslinks (known as “ladders”) formed of stationary but asymmetric LS. These states, together with the associated multipulse states, coexist within a parameter interval referred to as the snaking or pinning region. Outside this interval the LS grow or decay in time via a process referred to as depinning, i.e., through the nucleation or destruction of cells at the location of the fronts in a timedependent manner, while leaving the interior cells undisturbed. See Knobloch15 for a recent review.
More recently, 2D LS in SH23 have also been investigated. In Ref. McCS10 localized dimensional axisymmetric solutions, hereafter referred to as localized target patterns, are studied using numerical continuation. The timeindependent axisymmetric SH23 in dimensions is treated as a spatial dynamical system in the radial coordinate , with treated as an additional continuous parameter. For localized target patterns with a large radius, the radial profile of the front between the target and the equilibrium resembles a 1D pushed front. However, in contrast to 1D, near (known as the core region) the target typically has a larger amplitude than at large (known as the far field). As a result new rings can be nucleated both in the core and at the front, implying that the snaking behavior of localized target patterns for will differ from standard homoclinic snaking at . In particular, when the radius is sufficiently large, new rings are nucleated exclusively in the core. A different type of localized structure, stationary spatially localized hexagonal patterns, are studied in Ref. LSAC08 using numerical continuation. The existence of these solutions follows from a spatial conservation law for the timeindependent SH23 in 2D that generalizes a conserved spatial Hamiltonian present in 1D. Two classes of such states are known, hereafter referred to as planar and fully localized hexagonal patterns. The former are localized in 1D, forming a hexagonfilled stripe connected to the background state by a pair of planar fronts, while the latter are bounded by a hexagonal front and localized in 2D. Both structures grow via the nucleation of additional cells along the bounding fronts, in a process similar to standard homoclinic snaking. A novel feature of the planar case is the presence of secondary snaking branches, corresponding to the nucleation of individual cells along either front, between successive oscillations of the primary snaking branch that reflect the addition of complete rows of cells along the fronts. This growth mechanism is also observed along the snaking curve of fully localized hexagons. Outside the snaking region timedependent calculations show that these almost planar solutions evolve by losing or gaining cells onebyone in a manner that recapitulates their growth along the snaking branch of timeindependent solutions.
In the above example one of the two states comprising the LS is homogeneous in space while the other is a steady, spatially periodic Turing pattern. In other PDEs the two competing states may be both homogeneous states or both stationary patterns. A notable patternforming PDE exhibiting bistability between homogeneous states is the forced complex GinzburgLandau equation (FCGLE) with 2:1 resonance. This is an equation for a complex scalar amplitude CE:92 which describes the effect of subharmonic forcing on a Hopf bifurcation to a homogeneous oscillation in spatially extended systems ANR14 . This PDE possesses an updown symmetry and exhibits a parameter regime where the two “equivalent” equilibria related by this symmetry are simultaneously stable. In 1D a codimensionzero family of steady Ising fronts between is generically present, and may undergo a pitchfork bifurcation into traveling Bloch fronts BYK:08 ; near this IsingBloch transition the domain walls can exhibit rich spatiotemporal dynamics GoCoWa15 . In Ref. GCMO07 , a dynamical theory for the domain wall between in 2D leads to a characterization of different growth regimes and the prediction of the existence of stable “droplets”. In this paper we study instead the 1:1 FCGLE
(1.1) 
which exhibits, under appropriate conditions, bistability between two equilibria and belonging to the upper and lower branches of an Sshaped bifurcation diagram (Fig. 1). In 1D this regime generically exhibits a codimensionone family of steady Bloch fronts between when both are stable. Steady LS known as typeI LS can be constructed by assembling two such fronts backtoback. Recent work has focused on new dynamical phenomena that arise when becomes Turingunstable, including the snaking behavior and depinning dynamics of steady localized Turing patterns known as typeII LS MaThesis . In contrast to standard homoclinic snaking, typeII LS grow along a single snaking branch by nucleating new cells at the center of the wavetrain in a process termed defectmediated snaking (DMS) MBK10 . Outside the snaking region, typeII LS depin by creating or destroying cells in the interior of the wavetrain via successive phase slips, as studied quantitatively in Ref. MaKn12 . In the present paper, we characterize 2D LS in the plane in the parameter regime where typeI and typeII LS are found in 1D.
The bifurcation diagrams of the building blocks of these 1D and 2D LS are shown schematically in Fig. 1 in terms of a suitable norm as a function of the control parameter . In 1D, a branch of stripes bifurcates supercritically from at the Turing bifurcation , and may become bistable with to form typeII LS (Fig. 1(a)). In 2D, the Turing bifurcation generates, in addition to , a pair of hexagonal patterns, hereafter referred to as , that differ in whether the hexagons superposed on are composed of bumps or holes Golubitsky1984 . As a result the stripe pattern is unstable to hexagonal perturbations even when it bifurcates supercritically. The bifurcate transcritically and are likewise both unstable. However, in general one or the other of the folds back at and acquires stability as indicated in Fig. 1(b). This is the case in the present case as well.
(a)  (b) 
We begin by focusing on onepulse solutions in which the region occupied by the state forms a single connected component embedded in the state, although we briefly comment on “reciprocal” localized states in which the state is embedded in the state. When the connected component is finite, the interface separating forms a closed curve, and we refer to the region inside (outside) this curve as the inner (outer) region. For most of the localized states considered in this paper, this curve takes the shape of a perfect circle, the only shape that respects the rotational symmetry of Eq. (1.1). This behavior is reminiscent of variational systems that tend to minimize a surface energy, even though Eq. (1.1) is nonvariational. In §2 we study the simplest case, the case of circular fronts between . Next, we consider cases where the state is Turingunstable, leading to a patterned state near . As shown in §3 the steadystate solutions that result may take the form of an (approximately) periodic structure in the radial direction, and we find localized target patterns of this type using numerical continuation. In §4.1 we address the more complicated case where the pattern has hexagonal structure, and use direct numerical simulation (DNS) to identify a new type of LS consisting of localized hexagons that are surrounded by a ring, with this compound structure embedded in . We refer to these states as circular localized hexagonal patterns.
In order to study axisymmetric solutions, we write the 1:1 FCGLE (1.1) in polar coordinates ,
(1.2) 
where . Steady axisymmetric solutions satisfy Eq. (1.2) with , i.e.,
(1.3) 
Equation (1.3) can be readily generalized from 2D to dimensions,
(1.4) 
where is treated as a continuous parameter McCS10 . The boundary conditions for axisymmetric solutions are taken to be Neumann boundary conditions (NBC), i.e., at , independently of , or in terms of the real and imaginary parts of ,
(1.5) 
The norm of a dimensional axisymmetric solution on a circular domain is measured using either the 1D radial norm
(1.6) 
or the dimensional radial norm
(1.7) 
Although the dimensional radial norm is the physical norm for a multidimensional solution, the 1D radial norm weights all parts of the solution profile equally and hence better represents the profile changes near . The norm for a 2D solution (not necessarily axisymmetric) on a 2D domain is defined as
(1.8) 
This fully 2D norm is compatible with the dimensional radial norm because Eq. (1.7) with is identical to Eq. (1.8) when depends on only and is a circular domain of radius . For a localized state consisting of an inner pattern of radius embedded in an outer pattern on a domain of radius (), any of the above norms generates a monotonic function of that is well approximated by
(1.9) 
The spectral stability of an axisymmetric LS depends on its stability with respect to perturbations proportional to , or equivalently with azimuthal wavenumber , where . Hereafter we refer to this perturbation via its symmetry group as a perturbation, where denotes the dihedral group of order . Thus represents continuous rotations, represents the trivial rotation by , while for is generated by rotations by together with the reflections . The stability of is given by the spectrum of the linearized FCGL operator with , namely
with the boundary conditions given by Eq. (1.5).
In addition to the above fully localized states in which either the state or the patterned state occupies a finite region, there exist planar localized states in which these states occupy a region that is infinite along a certain direction. If such localized states are computed on a rectangle with periodic boundary conditions (PBC), we may suppose that the solutions are localized in, say, the direction, and periodic in the orthogonal direction, namely the direction. Two solutions of this type, planar fronts between and and localized stripe patterns can be constructed by extending TypeI LS and TypeII LS in the direction. Because these states are invariant under translation in , both satisfy the same PDE as their 1D counterparts and so will not be discussed further. Instead we focus in §4.3 on nontrivial examples in which the inner pattern is itself periodic in 2D. We conclude in §5 with some open questions.
2 Circular fronts
The properties of 1D fronts between in Eq. (1.1) are well understood MBK10 ; MaKn12 following earlier work in KW:05 . In a bifurcation diagram of TypeI LS formed by two steady 1D fronts assembled backtoback, the successive folds converge on a limiting parameter value in an oscillatory fashion as grows longer MBK10 . This bifurcation behavior is termed collapsed snaking, and the limiting parameter value is termed the collapse point. At fixed the collapse point occurs at . Traveling 1D fronts at correspond to heteroclinic orbits between of an ODE in the comoving frame MaKn12 .
In this section we study a family of 2D circular fronts between in Eq. (1.1). As in Refs. MBK10 ; MaKn12 we fix and vary as the bifurcation parameter. In §2.1 we compute the bifurcation diagram of steady circular fronts, and compare the observed bifurcation behavior with 1D collapsed snaking. In §2.2 we compute the spectral stability of this solution branch, and demonstrate the existence of stable oscillons and the presence of different types of symmetrybreaking instabilities. In §2.3 we compute traveling circular fronts using both 2D and axisymmetric time evolution, and show that these correspond to heteroclinic orbits between in the radially comoving ODE.
2.1 Radially collapsed snaking
As pointed out in §1, steady dimensional axisymmetric solutions to Eq. (1.1) satisfy Eq. (1.4). Since in 1D () the collapsed snaking branch of TypeI LS originates from the lower saddlenode of the Sshaped bifurcation diagram of equilibria (Fig. 1), we may postulate the same for the branch of steady circular fronts in 2D (). In 1D weakly nonlinear solutions near can be derived using standard asymptotic methods (eg., Ref. BYK:08 ) and these can be continued from 1D to 2D by incrementing from to in Eq. (1.4); see Ref. McQS14 for an analytical description of these 2D weakly nonlinear solutions in the 2:1 FCGLE. Once has been reached the resulting solutions can then be continued in with fixed, namely within Eq. (1.3). Figure 2 shows the branch of steady 2D axisymmetric solutions thus obtained. As the branch is followed towards larger norm, the weakly nonlinear solutions homoclinic to do indeed grow into steady circular fronts between as postulated.
A circular front has a welldefined radius, , which may be measured by
(2.1) 
As shown in Fig. 2, in the upper part the branch approaches the limit as the norm or equivalently the front radius increases. This is because at , the curvature term in Eq. (1.3) vanishes and the steady circular front becomes identical to the steady 1D front, which exists only at . In general, the instantaneous speed of a circular front is a smooth function of and . Moreover, a circular front with large is well described by the governing ODE in restricted to an interval of width around where . Hence for near and large, the front speed should depend linearly on and the front curvature as
(2.2) 
The function at is plotted in Fig. 3 in Ref. MaKn12 , while at can be determined from Fig. 2 of this paper using Eq. (1.9). From the linearization of these two functions around the origin, we obtain numerically
(2.3) 
In Appendix A we derive the analog of Eq. (2.2) analytically for variational PDEs.
Using the definition , we can rewrite Eq. (2.2) as the following ODE for :
(2.4) 
The nontrivial equilibrium and its eigenvalue within Eq. (2.4), denoted by
(2.5) 
correspond, respectively, to the steady circular front and an eigenvalue in the spectrum of . As stated above, becomes a steady 1D front located at as . In this limit, in the spectrum of the eigenvalue is the only marginal eigenvalue and has multiplicity . The corresponding eigenfunction is the amplitude mode , which coincides with the Goldstone mode resulting from the invariance of Eq. (1.3) under translation in as . As increases, the radius of a stationary front decreases and the translational invariance is broken more and more strongly. As a result, the amplitude (Goldstone) mode acquires a nonzero growth rate as given by Eq. (2.5). As shown in Fig. 3, the growth rate of the amplitude mode along the branch determined by continuation does indeed agree with Eq. (2.5) for small .
As shown in Fig. 2, the LS branch first undergoes a series of ten folds, which we label as , , counting from . The distance between successive folds increases nonmonotonically as the oscillatory tail around is annihilated at . This behavior is reminiscent of 1D collapsed snaking (CS), and will therefore be referred to as radially collapsed snaking (RCS). The oscillatory tail around results from the fact that the spatial eigenvalues of form a complex quartet denoted by with . For CS, it was shown in Ref. KW:05 (Lemma 2.3) that as the front radius increases, approaches the limiting value according to
(2.6) 
where is a constant. For dimensional axisymmetric fronts in variational PDEs, it is shown in Appendix A that if either or , then RCS results from a competition between the tail oscillation consistent with Eq. (2.6) and the monotonic contribution proportional to the front curvature. If this also holds for the 1:1 FCGLE, then as decreases from , folds should begin to appear at , where is given by Eq. (A.16) of Appendix A. In the case, this equation can be solved asymptotically to yield
(2.7) 
In the present parameter regime, for not much larger than , the spatial eigenvalues are and . Hence the predicted critical radius using Eq. (2.7) is , while the wavelength of the oscillatory tail is . In comparison, the measured radii at and on the branch are respectively and . As shown in Fig. 3, the growth rate of the amplitude mode changes sign at , . As a result, stable oscillons with radii approximately and exist, respectively, in the narrow intervals and , and no stable oscillon exists with radius greater than . The existence of a maximum stable radius is a unique feature of axisymmetric oscillons in two or higher dimensions.
As the branch reaches from above, the solution becomes well localized around with the front radius comparable to the tail wavelength. Thus the RCS mechanism based on the annihilation of the oscillatory tail cannot account for the lower folds. The complete spectral stability of the entire branch is computed directly in the next section.
2.2 Spectral stability
Figure 4 shows the spectral stability of steady axisymmetric oscillons on the RCS branch in Fig. 2, where is the real part of the eigenvalue , and is the arclength along the branch relative to the bifurcation point at . The spectra are plotted only for the lowest azimuthal wavenumbers to since oscillons with small radii are most likely unstable to perturbations with small . For each , only the two largest values of , or equivalently the two most unstable or leading eigenvalues, are plotted. Thus at any , the presence of two values of implies that the leading eigenvalue is real, whereas a single value of implies that the leading eigenvalues form a complex conjugate pair. Owing to translation invariance there is always a zero eigenvalue in the spectrum, which is filtered out before the spectrum is plotted. The locations of the folds on the RCS branch are labeled using dashed vertical lines.
The spectrum is shown in black in Fig. 4. There is an amplitude mode whose eigenvalue is real and changes sign at every fold. As a result, oscillons are unstable on the segments , , and , and stable on the segments and . Interestingly, on the segment , the real eigenvalue of the amplitude mode and a smaller real eigenvalue first coalesce into a complex conjugate pair, and this pair then splits back into the real eigenvalue of the amplitude mode and a smaller real eigenvalue. Thus, for oscillons on this segment, perturbations may decay in either monotonic or oscillatory fashion depending on . This process of coalescence and splitting happens again on the segment , but this time the complex conjugate pair resulting from the coalescence of the two real eigenvalues becomes unstable before splitting back to two real eigenvalues, this time with the smaller eigenvalue corresponding to the amplitude mode . Thus, for oscillons on this segment, perturbations may grow or decay depending on and may do so in either monotonic or oscillatory fashion. Beyond , oscillons are unstable on the segments , , and , and stable on the segments and , as explained by the RCS mechanism in §2.1.
The spectra for are shown, respectively, in green, red, and magenta. Since the odd segments , , with are always unstable, we only consider stability, , on the even segments . We observe that the leading eigenvalues are always stable, and are generally more stable than the leading eigenvalues. The leading and eigenvalues are stable on all even segments except ; on part of this segment, these eigenvalues are real and unstable.
In summary, oscillons on the even segments with relatively small or large radii, specifically those on , , are spectrally stable. However, oscillons with intermediate radii, specifically those on , are always unstable and may in addition be and unstable.
These instabilities may be observed by timeevolving steady oscillons with superposed small amplitude random noise. Figure 5 shows the time evolution at on the segment , where the only unstable eigenvalue is (). In this case, the instability is triggered by the noise in the initial condition, and the solution subsequently expands symmetrically. After colliding with its images relative to the periodic domain boundaries, the solution first evolves into a spot homoclinic to the equilibrium ; this spot then persists for a long time before eventually collapsing into itself. Figure 6 shows the time evolution at on the segment , where the unstable eigenvalues are (), (), and (). In this case, the noise triggers a instability, and the solution subsequently oscillates symmetrically. As the oscillation amplitude increases, the instability takes over and the subsequent evolution beginning with a symmetric expansion is similar to Fig. 5.
2.3 Traveling circular fronts
As shown in §2.1, the radius of a steady circular front is determined locally uniquely by the value of the parameter . Traveling circular fronts are therefore expected when is changed by or is changed by . When () and , namely, when the front radius is contracted (expanded) at fixed , DNS shows that the circular front continues to contract (expand). Figure 7 shows that in the latter case the circular front eventually collides with four image fronts, and evolves into reciprocal circular fronts centered at the corners, with now embedded in . The solution eventually becomes spatially uniform when the bubbles in the corners contract to zero.
The contraction and expansion processes maintain axisymmetry provided the LS does not reach the domain boundary. In general, axisymmetric time evolution is described by Eq. (1.2) with , namely
(2.8) 
Figure 8 shows radial spacetime plots illustrating these processes computed from Eq. (2.8), with the front evolution predicted using Eq. (2.4) shown as the dashed line. The agreement is excellent. In both contraction and expansion, we observe that the front speed increases as the front radius evolves away from its equilibrium value. The resulting front evolution is well approximated by Eq. (2.4) as long as the front radius remains large, or equivalently the front curvature remains small.
At any given time during the time evolution, the front radius can be measured by Eq. (2.1) and the instantaneous front speed can be computed as . Moreover, DNS results in Fig. 8 suggest that to a good approximation, is the instantaneous speed at which the entire front moves in the radial direction. Thus traveling circular fronts are well approximated by solutions to the radial PDE Eq. (2.8) of the form near . This ansatz turns Eq. (2.8) into the radial traveling wave ODE
(2.9) 
Using this ODE with NBC given by Eq. (1.5), the steady circular front in Fig. 2 with can be numerically continued to obtain a family of traveling circular fronts with . Figure 9 shows the front speed as a function of the front radius measured from DNS and computed using continuation. The agreement is excellent for the range of over which is measured. In agreement with the RCS argument leading to Eq. (2.7), starts to oscillate as a function of near .
Further continuation of this branch towards more negative front speed yields a family of contracting pulse rings. A contracting pulse ring is essentially a 1D stationary pulse bent into a circle in 2D, and thus its speed is proportional to its curvature ; see Appendix A for an analytical description of contracting/expanding pulse rings in variational PDEs. As shown in Fig. 10(a), the proportionality constant is negative. The governing ODE for the ring radius, , can be solved to yield
(2.10) 
with the constant determined by the initial condition. As shown in Fig. 10(b), the contracting pulse ring taken from this branch is amplitudeunstable and thus rapidly evolves into a thicker contracting pulse ring. The latter contracts to zero in a parabolic fashion as predicted by Eq. (2.10) with ; nontrivial dynamics are visible just prior to extinction when the radius of the ring becomes comparable to the pulse width. We remark that the evolution of a 1D stationary pulse bent into a closed 2D curve of an arbitrary shape may be analyzed following previous work on the SwiftHohenberg equation GlLi13 .
(a)  (b) 
3 Localized target patterns
The properties of timeindependent TypeII LS of Eq. (1.1) in 1D are explored in Refs. MBK10 ; MaKn12 . These structures consist of a Turing pattern bifurcating from embedded in the homogeneous state . The associated bifurcation diagram consists of a single solution branch oscillating between two distinct limiting parameter values; the oscillations reflect the growth of the Turing pattern via roll insertion at the center MBK10 . This bifurcation behavior is termed defectmediated snaking (DMS), the limiting parameter values are called the snaking limits, and the parameter interval inbetween is called the snaking interval. At fixed snaking takes place in the interval . Outside the snaking interval, TypeII LS depin by creating or destroying rolls in the interior of the wavetrain via successive phase slips MaKn12 . These phase slips occur at the center of the LS when is near either limit of the snaking region, but offcenter for farther away.
In this section we study a family of 2D localized target solutions of Eq. (1.1) formed by embedding into an axisymmetric Turing pattern that bifurcates supercritically from (Fig. 1(a)). As in Refs. MBK10 ; MaKn12 we fix and vary as the bifurcation parameter. In §3.1 we compute the bifurcation diagram of steady localized target patterns, and compare their bifurcation behavior with 1D DMS and 2D RCS. In §3.2 we compute the spectral stability of solutions along this branch, and identify instabilities with possible relevance to experiments. In §3.3 we compute the radial depinning of localized target patterns, and compare their temporal dynamics with the depinning of TypeII LS in 1D.
3.1 Coremediated snaking
The branch of 2D axisymmetric steady states similar to Fig. 2 but computed at is shown in Fig. 11. Overall this branch is similar to the 2D RCS branch shown in Fig. 2, where the curvature of the circular front causes the upper part to converge monotonically to a single limiting parameter value. In contrast to Fig. 2, in the present case the branch undergoes shaped snaking on narrow intervals of . The separation between successive intervals decreases as the norm increases and the solutions high up the branch take the form of localized target patterns (Fig. 11). As shown in the video accompanying Fig. 11, the localized target patterns in Eq. (1.1) grow through a central defect at the core , similar to 1D DMS. This bifurcation structure is hereafter referred to as coremediated snaking (CMS).
The snaking mechanism of localized target patterns in the 1:1 FCGLE may be compared with the behavior of the corresponding structures in SH23 McCS10 . When new rolls in SH23 are nucleated at the location of the fronts while in the 1:1 FCGLE they are inserted by the division of the central “cell” or “defect”. When localized target patterns in both equations possess a spike at . As a result, as increases, the snaking mechanism in SH23 changes from 1D standard homoclinic snaking to 2D CMS via a stack of isolas. In contrast, in the 1:1 FCGLE the defect and the spike are both located at and as increases the snaking mechanism is expected to transition continuously from 1D DMS to 2D shaped CMS without the breakup of the snaking curve. We remark that in either SH23 or the 1:1 FCGLE, since the core plays the role of a “pacemaker” that emits new rings, the solutions with a local maximum/minimum at (known as type A/B solutions in Ref. McCS10 ) necessarily exist on the CMS branch in an alternative fashion.
To test this conjecture, we have continued solutions to Eq. (1.4) in the dimension ; the result of this continuation at is shown in Fig. 12. In order that the snaking in corresponds to snaking in at nearby values of , we plot the solution branch in the plane, such that the sharper folds are located on the right. In this way a pair of adjacent Cshaped segments forms the body of the letter . Near the snaking in takes place mostly in and resembles DMS except that the folds corresponding to maxima and minima in at no longer align with each other. As increases a hysteresis loop appears on the bottom segment of every pair of adjacent Cshaped segments, while the snaking interval in becomes narrower. At , the two additional segments forming this hysteresis loop can be regarded as the (short) tail of the current and the (long) head of the preceding letter . Thus one extra ring is added at the core every time the branch passes through a shaped segment. At large (e.g. ), the body of the disappears via two hysteresis bifurcations, although the head and tail remain. We have not continued the branch to even larger and thus cannot ascertain whether another hysteresis bifurcation would eventually lead to a bifurcation curve without folds, but from Fig. 12 the branch appears to approach a straight line in the plane as .
Apart from continuation in for near , we have also examined other slices at constant but these continuations do not lead to axisymmetric steady states in higher dimensions. Specifically, for smaller (near ) the branch snakes towards while for intermediate (about halfway between and ) the branch snakes around .
3.2 Spectral stability
Figure 13 shows the spectral stability of steady axisymmetric oscillons on the CMS branch in Fig. 11, plotted using the same conventions as in Fig. 4. As in Fig. 4, oscillons on even segments with relatively small radii are spectrally stable. In contrast to Fig. 4, oscillons with intermediate radii may be unstable not only for , but also for . Also, oscillons with relatively large radii, which resemble localized target patterns, are generally unstable for due to azimuthal instability of the rings.
Figure 14 shows the time evolution of a steady oscillon at on the segment , where the unstable eigenvalues are () and (). In this case, the noise initially excites a instability, and the solution subsequently develops a symmetric interior. The symmetry is subsequently restored, triggering the instability. As a result, the solution first oscillates and then expands symmetrically, before colliding with its images and eventually evolving into a hexagonal pattern.
For , the locations on the RCS or CMS branch where the stability changes correspond to bifurcation points to steady fold symmetric oscillons. Further from the onset, these fold symmetric oscillons may become stable, in which case they may be identified with the fold symmetric oscillon “molecules” observed in some experiments UMS:96 ; LHARF:99 . Thus, dipoles formed by two outofphase oscillons may bifurcate from a bifurcation point, dimers formed by two inphase oscillons may bifurcate from a bifurcation point, and so on. A detailed study of the interaction between simple oscillons and the bifurcation of oscillon molecules is left for future work.
3.3 Radial depinning and traveling circular fronts
Owing to the presence of azimuthal instabilities, fully 2D DNS of localized target patterns generally produce fully 2D localized states, as discussed further in §4.1. On the other hand, azimuthal instabilities may be artificially suppressed by imposing axisymmetry on the solutions. This procedure allows us to time evolve localized target patterns using Eq. (2.8) and to study radial depinning of the bounding front, as done in §2.3. Since the front speed and the dynamically selected interior wavenumber are in general coupled MaKn12 we assume in the following that the wavenumber selection is largely passive (i.e., that depends only weakly on ). In this case the speed may be regarded as a function of the control parameter and the front radius only, as in §2.3. Hence to obtain , we can start with a localized target pattern at a particular fold on the CMS branch in Fig. 11 and either change the radius by or the parameter by ; the outcome is similar. Figure 15 shows radial spacetime plots computed for different choices of the fold location and perturbation . Figures 15 and 15 show the time evolution near and far from the CMS region, respectively, in both cases starting from an initial condition at a left fold on the CMS branch; Figs. 15 and 15 show the corresponding results for an initial condition at a right fold instead. In all four cases, the front speed increases as the front radius evolves away from its equilibrium value, and individual rings are destroyed or created in the interior of the structure via repeated phase slips. Thus, radial depinning of localized target patterns inherits the key features of both traveling circular fronts and depinning of TypeII LS in 1D. A particularly interesting new feature is that near the CMS region the phase slips occur right at the core, while far from the CMS region the phase slips occur both right at the core and at a nonzero radius away from the core.
Of particular interest is the behavior of the core at . To the left of the left fold the structure contracts, but the way it does so depends on whether the perturbation is small in which case the frequency with which phase slips occur in the core accelerates as the target contracts (Fig. 15), or the perturbation is large in which case the majority of the phase slips take place away from the core (Fig. 15). Similar behavior is seen when the target expands. If the perturbation is small the phase slip frequency in the core continues to increase as the target expands (Fig. 15), but it decreases with time when the perturbation is large (Fig. 15). Thus the different magnitudes of the perturbation have distinct consequences. A small perturbation destabilizes the core ring first since curvature narrows the range of stable rings. The resulting phase slip eliminates a ring at the core but the inward front motion triggers additional phase slips at the core. As the structure contracts more and more rapidly the phase slip frequency necessarily increases. In contrast, when the structure contracts because of a large perturbation the inward motion of the front compresses mostly the outer rings (the curvature provides the inner rings with increased stiffness) leading to phase slips in the vicinity of the front. The converse happens when the structure expands. Thus the system “remembers” the initial perturbation that led to the contraction or expansion, in contrast to the 1D case in which the phase slips near the fronts on either side gradually migrate inwards to or outward from the center as the structure contracts or expands. We attribute these differences to the reduced role played by curvature in the outer regions of the pattern and hence to radial inhomogeneity of the contraction or expansion processes.
As in the 1D case MaKn12 , Eq. (2.9) contains codimension1 traveling circular fronts between for either sign of the front speed . Figure 16(a) shows two branches of contracting/expanding circular fronts computed at (blue) and (red), which are found to exist on opposite sides of the shaped CMS branch of steady localized target patterns (black). Near , these two branches are expected to approach the left and right snaking limits of the CMS branch and thus remain separated by a finite distance. The origin of this phenomenon is the socalled “reversibilitybreaking” bifurcation on at MaKn12 . As crosses zero, the two pairs of spatial eigenvalues and () of cross the imaginary axis simultaneously in opposite directions. As a result, the unstable eigendirections of change by a finite amount, and so does the value of at which the heteroclinic orbit between exists.
For , the real part of the unstable eigenvalue of scales as MaKn12 . Thus as discussed in §2.1, the branch of traveling circular fronts between should exhibit RCS. Figure 16(b) shows the bifurcation parameter as a function of the curvature at . The solid dot labels the critical radius beyond which folds disappear. At this point one calculates that , so the predicted critical radius based on Eq. (2.7) is . Thus even for relatively small , Eq. (2.7) underestimates the critical radius . To understand this discrepancy, we note that the underlying assumption of Eq. (2.7) that the tail oscillation is presumes that the core amplitude is . While this holds true for 1D LS, 2D axisymmetric LS are often found to have larger amplitude cores Lloyd2 ; McCS10 . Figure 16(c) shows the logarithm of the core amplitude as a function of the front radius at . It can be seen that the decaying exponent is indeed for large , but becomes less than for smaller including values around .
(a)  (b) 
(c) 
4 Localized hexagonal patterns
In this section we study a family of 2D localized hexagonal patterns consisting of fully 2D hexagonal patterns embedded in . This family is further divided into circular (§4.1) and planar (§4.3) localized hexagonal patterns. We distinguish between two cases: the supercritical case and the subcritical case . As in §3 we fix and vary ; the Turing bifurcation point is .
4.1 Circular localized hexagonal patterns
In the supercritical case fully 2D LS can be found by timeevolving localized target patterns in 2D. The rings rapidly break up into hexagons as a result of azimuthal instabilities triggered by the discretization. Figure 17 shows snapshots of the initial stages of this 2D time evolution at with the localized target pattern in Fig. 11 used as initial condition. The fully 2D pattern that emerges consists of an approximately hexagonal pattern filling the interior of a circular front. Since the 2D solution is discretized along the and directions, the initial pattern contains multiple defects arranged into a symmetric configuration (Fig. 17). Shortly thereafter, this symmetric pattern breaks up from the center and the defects reorganize into a pair of parabolas with symmetry (Fig. 17). This symmetry breaking process is reminiscent of the creation of symmetric dimers or symmetric trimers from a symmetric hexagonal lattice of oscillons observed in experiments UMS:96 ; LHARF:99 .
The subsequent evolution of the state in Fig. 17(a) is driven by the presence of the defects. These take the form of the pentahepta defects familiar from other haxagonforming systems (these are located along the  axes in the figure and nearer the center); however, free pentagonal defects are found near the periphery of the structure where curvature effects are significant. The latter serve as loci of phase slips whereby new cells are inserted (or deleted) from the structure leading to readjustment of nearby cells that in turn triggers the formation of new defects. As a result the whole structure undergoes slow, phaseslip driven evolution. Figure 17(b) shows a later state of the system: the structure has almost the same size and shape but the defect distribution differs, with the defects forming prominent chains at later times (see the video at this URL). In contrast to §2.3 and §3.3, this defectdriven evolution cannot be axisymmetric, and so the front bounding the hexagons does not remain perfectly circular at all times. Simulations indicate that there is an approximate critical radius such that the bounding front contracts (expands) when the front radius (). When is far from , the azimuthallyaveraged front speed depends mainly on and the azimuthallyaveraged front radius evolves in a manner similar to the circular traveling fronts described in §2.3. However, when is near , the average front speed becomes more sensitive to the details of the hexagonal pattern, which makes it difficult to determine precisely or stabilize the evolution by feedback control.
When is near , the bounding front expands (contracts) slowly and hexagons can be created (annihilated) anywhere within the region they occupy. When is further from , the bounding front expands (contracts) more rapidly and hexagons tend to be created (annihilated) at a fixed distance from the bounding front. This faster evolution is analogous to offcenter depinning of TypeII LS in 1D. For both slow and fast evolution, the bounding front remains almost perfectly circular. However, when is far from , fast viscous shocks may propagate azimuthally along the bounding front and these create (annihilate) hexagons on a yet faster timescale. This evolution has no 1D analog and is referred to as ultrafast. Figure 18 shows a snapshot of a contracting solution obtained from an initial that is slightly below ; in this case the initial evolution is slow but transitions to fast and subsequently ultrafast contraction once becomes sufficiently small. Figure 18 shows a snapshot of an expanding solution for which the initial is slightly above ; in this case once fast expansion sets, the circular localized hexagonal pattern collides with its images, and evolves into a reciprocal circular localized hexagonal pattern centered on the corners. In contrast to the contraction case, ultrafast expansion does not take place when becomes very large. Once the reciprocal circular localized hexagonal pattern forms, hexagons are always created right behind the bounding front; of course this front has negative curvature, in contrast to the bounding front in Fig. 18. The domain is ultimately filled with a hexagonal pattern containing multiple chains of pentahepta defects inherited from the initial evolution.
The presence of front pinning in localized target patterns and the apparent absence of pinning in circular localized hexagonal patterns can be understood by comparing the orientations of the bounding front and the periodic pattern within. In a localized target pattern, the circular front is always pinned to a periodic pattern in the direction perpendicular to itself, i.e., in the radial direction. However, in a circular localized hexagonal pattern, the circular front cannot be pinned to a hexagonal pattern that is only periodic along three directions.
4.2 Interpretation: Single and double front structure
As illustrated in Fig. 1(b), in 2D the Turing bifurcation on results generically in stripes and hexagons. The bifurcation to the resulting unstable branch of stripes is supercritical as shown in Ref. MBK10 . The bifurcation to hexagons is transcritical, with the bifurcating hexagons unstable on both sides of the bifurcation. As detailed next, the uphexagons consisting of a hexagonal array of peaks (in terms of ) bifurcate subcritically, i.e., into , while the downhexagons consisting of a hexagonal array of dips bifurcate supercritically, i.e., into . The former turn around in a saddlenode bifurcation at and acquire stability on the upper part of the branch (Fig. 1(b)). Thus in the stable state coexists with the stable state, while for only the state is (locally) stable and so coexists with the stable state instead.
In the subcritical regime stationary fronts exist between and , and these are a consequence of the pinning of the front to the hexagonal structure on one side. As illustrated in Fig. 20(a,b), these stationary fronts can be assembled into steady fully and planar localized hexagonal patterns. Figure 19 shows examples of both types computed via DNS with the initial condition taken to be a hexagonal (rectangular) patch of hexagons embedded in . The hexagons are obtained by incrementing adiabatically from past and into . The computations are done with the horizontal and vertical domain sizes and for which the wavenumber is close to the critical Turing wavenumber at , and is occupied by exactly rows of hexagons. The resulting hexagons remain amplitude stable for , where and are well approximated by
(4.1) 
with and at . These hexagons are thus uphexagons (i.e., ); indeed as seen in Figs. 17 & 19, consists of a hexagonal array of peaks. We remark that for some parameters the wavenumber is found to be Eckhaus unstable. For both fully and planar localized hexagonal patterns, the front between and selects a preferred hexagonal wavelength, and the subsequent dynamics depend on the choice of . In the supercritical regime the stable invades the unstable via a pulled front. As increases past , the pulled front transitions into a pushed front between the bistable and . In the subcritical regime , the pushed front expands for smaller and contracts for larger ; videos of the expansion and contraction of fully localized hexagonal patterns (Fig. 20(a)) at and can be viewed at this URL and this URL, while videos of the expansion and contraction of the related planar localized hexagonal patterns (Fig. 20(b)) at and can be viewed at this URL and this URL. Interestingly, in the later stages of expansion the hexagonal pattern has line defects along the boundaries and thus does not fill the domain perfectly. For intermediate the front is expected to be pinned to the hexagonal pattern over a finite interval of known as the pinning region. The above DNS results suggest that the pinning region may be very narrow, which is consistent with the slowly varying front profile and the proximity to the Turing bifurcation KoCh13 ; Fig. 19(a) and Fig. 19(b) show almost steady fully and planar localized hexagonal patterns at and . Similar solutions have been studied in detail using numerical continuation for SH23 LSAC08 , while associated depinning dynamics present outside the pinning region have been studied numerically in the LengyelEpstein model JPMDB94 and in a crystallization model by Archer et al. AWTK:14 .
(a)  (b) 
Theory vS03 shows that in the subcritical regime the front between and is a single pushed front. However, in the supercritical regime the front between and generally exhibits a double front structure, with a first front connecting the stable state to the unstable state, and a second front connecting the state to the unstable state. In Ref. AWTK:14 the transition between the single and double fronts near has been studied in some detail using appropriate amplitude equations HN:00 ; DSSS:03 . One finds that sufficiently far from the speed of the  front is determined by the marginal stability criterion as appropriate for a pulled front vS03 and likewise for the  front. However, as the distance is reduced, the  speed departs from the predictions of the marginal stability theory and is determined instead nonlinearly. This is a consequence of an orbitflip whereby the front approaches with a faster decay rate than expected generically. This transition leads to a speed that connects smoothly to the pushed front speed computed in the subcritical regime.
The circular localized hexagonal patterns described in §4.1 are supercritical localized hexagons with embedded in (see Fig. 17). Since in this parameter regime is unstable and coexists with stable , the circular fronts that form between and are strongly nonlinear and cannot be described by weakly nonlinear theory in Refs. HN:00 ; DSSS:03 . We conjecture, however, following AWTK:14 , that in this case the front between and exhibits an analogous double front structure, with a first front connecting the stable state to the unstable state , and a second front connecting the state to the stable state; see Fig. 20(c) for an illustration. The stripe state is visible in the transition region between these two fronts as a ring enclosing the hexagonal state. The  front is described by Eq. (2.8) and studied in §3.3; its speed may be inward or outward depending on and the front radius . Meanwhile, the  speed is always outward since the stable state necessarily invades the unstable state, and always larger than the  speed. As a result, a single stationary stripe is observed along the boundary of the circular localized hexagonal patterns and its speed is expected to be slaved to the slower contraction or expansion speed of the hexagonal state driven by phase slips within.
(a)  (b)  (c)  (d) 
The above notions become clearer in the case of localized hexagonal patterns organized in a stripelike structure, referred to as planar localized hexagonal patterns, as illustrated in Fig. 20(d) and discussed next.
4.3 Planar localized hexagonal patterns
Planar 2D LS can be found by timeevolving localized stripe patterns (Fig. 21) in 2D, with superposed smallamplitude noise to excite transverse instabilities of the stripes. Figure 21 shows snapshots of the initial stages of this 2D time evolution. The fully 2D pattern that emerges consists of hexagons that align themselves along the stripes with possibly multiple defects. The subsequent dynamics of this hexagonal pattern in the background depend on the value of used in the time evolution. However, in each case the fronts connecting the structure to remain approximately straight and hence the doublefront picture sketched above is no longer complicated by curvature effects.
For smaller , the planar localized hexagonal pattern eventually contracts into a planar symmetric pulse, namely a 1D symmetric pulse invariant in the direction. In this process the hexagonal cells are repeatedly annihilated by viscous shocks traveling along the bounding fronts, similar to the ultrafast contraction phase of circular localized hexagonal patterns. A snapshot of the resulting state is shown in Fig. 22 at . For larger , the planar localized hexagonal pattern expands into a possibly imperfect hexagonal pattern that fills the 2D domain. In this process new hexagonal cells are created in the interior by phase slips centered on two lines of defects that result from the slow separation of the bounding fronts, similar to the fast expansion phase of circular localized hexagonal patterns. A snapshot of the resulting state is shown in Fig. 22 at .
Despite the outward (inward) motion of the bounding fronts at larger (smaller) , we have not found steady planar localized hexagonal patterns at any intermediate . As shown in Fig. 23, at the boundary shocks and interior defects compete with each other, leading to nonunidirectional front motion. As a result the final state (Fig. 23) is considerably displaced from the initial centerline () owing to the stochastic creation and annihilation of hexagonal cells. More remarkably, this final state provides an example of a quasisteady localized state with a complicated inner structure, which is quite unexpected in spatially homogeneous pattern forming PDEs. The inner structure consists of a few rows of hexagonal cells interspersed with defects arranged in a frustrated configuration that overall neither contracts nor expands, although the competition between these two tendencies manifests itself occasionally as local pulsations. A remarkable video (see this URL) shows the evolution of this state. The earlier parts of the video show clearly the propagation of phase slips, whereby a phase slip triggers an adjacent phase slip etc. The later parts of this very long simulation show persistent dynamics in an apparently equilibrium state, i.e., a state of a moreorless fixed width. This residual time dependence may be associated with the fact that the state is invading the unstable stripe state from the inside while the stable background state invades from the outside, just as in the case of the almost steady circular localized hexagonal patterns. The resulting fronts are approximately stationary but select wavelengths dynamically; these wavelengths may lie outside the stability balloon of the hexagonal state leading to phase slips and may, moreover, be incommensurate with the width of the structure, thereby providing an additional source of disequilibrium. Analogous planar localized hexagonal patterns in the subcritical case are shown in Fig. 19(b).
The difference between the dynamics of circular and planar localized hexagonal patterns may be attributed to the effective boundary conditions experienced by the hexagons. In the circular case, the bounding front is a single closed curve that acts as a free boundary for the hexagons. As a result, the wavelength of the hexagons can change freely in response to front motion. However, in the planar case, the two bounding fronts are localized in and periodic in , and thus act as free boundaries for the hexagons only in the direction. Thus the wavelength of the hexagons can change freely in response to front motion, but the wavelength is fixed by the periodic boundary conditions in . This anisotropy of the hexagonal pattern may help explain the coexistence of contraction associated with the fronts and expansion from the interior of the structure.
5 Conclusion
In this paper we have characterized 2D LS in the 1:1 FCGLE with different inner patterns and front shapes. The parameters are chosen near a codimensiontwo point between a steady front between two spatially homogeneous equilibria and a supercritical Turing bifurcation on one of them. Steady circular fronts in the Turingstable regime and localized target patterns in the Turingunstable regime respectively exhibit new bifurcation structures termed radially collapsed snaking (RCS) and coremediated snaking (CMS). Axisymmetric oscillons on the RCS and CMS branches are found to be spectrally stable over a wide parameter interval, and subject to various types of radial and azimuthal instabilities otherwise. New temporal dynamics involving front contraction or expansion are found using radial and fully 2D time evolution, the latter leading to fully 2D LS including supercritical circular and planar localized hexagonal patterns.
The stable axisymmetric oscillons in the 1:1 FCGLE may be compared with the 2:1 FCGLE McQS14 . In the 2:1 case, stable 2D oscillons exist on a much narrower parameter interval than stable 1D oscillons. In contrast, in the 1:1 case, stable 2D oscillons exist on multiple segments of the RCS and CMS branches, and the width of the existence interval is comparable to stable 1D oscillons. The existence of multiple folds on these branches results from the existence of a supercritical Turing bifurcation near a stable front, which is not known to occur in the 2:1 case. However, stable 2D oscillons may be similarly present in other harmonically forced systems relevant to experiments.
The subcritical localized hexagonal patterns in the 1:1 FCGLE (Fig. 19) may be compared with SH23 LSAC08 . In particular, the bifurcation diagrams of steady solutions may be computable using numerical continuation following Ref. LSAC08 . In the supercritical case new types of temporal dynamics include the slow expansion (contraction) of the hexagonal pattern driven by phase slips, and the nonunidirectional front motion of planar localized hexagonal patterns near the equivalent of a Maxwell point. It is possible that in large domains the occurrence of phase slips may be treated as a stochastic process, with a corresponding stochastic description of the front motion. In particular, it may be that on particular timescales, the front motion near the Maxwell point can be viewed as a random walk. These features may be further understood by locating the pentahepta defects through computing the coordination numbers of the individual hexagons, and studying their lifetimes. These ideas are left for future work.
We remark, finally, that the present system also exhibits parameter regimes where the homogeneous equilibria and the hexagonal pattern are all simultaneously stable. In particular, the “Maxwell” point between may lie inside the pinning region between and . Near this tristable situation, the front speed competition may produce additional interesting dynamics.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by NSF under grant DMS1211953 (EK).
Appendix A Axisymmetric fronts in variational PDEs
In this Appendix we consider the following class of variational PDEs for :
(A.1) 
and seek dimensional axisymmetric traveling wave solutions of the form , where denotes the radial coordinate. At , these solutions satisfy the following ODE
(A.2) 
To derive an expression for the instantaneous speed , we expand the operator as
(A.3) 
multiply Eq. (A.2) by and integrate over to obtain
(A.4) 
For the integral of to be bounded, we require or equivalently , where is a constant.
The first term on the right side of Eq. (A.4) becomes
(A.5) 
where the function denotes the following indefinite integral
(A.6) 
The integrand takes the form of a total derivative. After integration, the function depends only on the th derivatives , , and can be identified as the 1D steady state Hamiltonian of Eq. (A.1).
Now let us assume that nearly vanishes except in an interval around for , or equivalently that is an axisymmetric front with large radius connecting two flat states and . In this case we can simplify the second term on the right side in Eq. (A.4) by approximating with in the integrand and then integrating by parts to obtain
(A.7) 
with an error term that can be combined with the third term of Eq. (A.4).
In summary, we obtain from Eq. (A.4) the following analytic expression for the front speed
(A.8) 
where and are given by Eqs. (A.5) and (A.7). Since for large the term in Eq. (A.2) can be omitted without affecting the relevant dynamics to leading order, the integrals in Eqs. (A.7) – (A.8) can be approximated by replacing with the 1D front profile at the same parameters. Physically the front motion is driven by both the free energy (or equivalently Hamiltonian) difference and the surface (or interfacial) energy . To leading order evaluates to
(A.9) 
and may take two qualitatively different forms:

The two equilibria are equivalent when is a pulse () or an Ising front ( and ). In this case
(A.10) 
The two equilibria are inequivalent when is a Bloch front. In this case only at the Maxwell point with denoting the control parameter. Near
(A.11)
The term is proportional to the front curvature . It follows from Eq. (A.8) and the definition that steady axisymmetric fronts are unstable with respect to radius change when , and stable otherwise. In particular, for onecomponent reactiondiffusion equations, or equivalently when , these fronts are always unstable because
(A.12) 
However, when higher order terms like are present in , as is the case for the SwiftHohenberg equation and its generalizations, these fronts may be stable in certain parameter regimes since is an alternating sum that can take either sign.
a.1 Radially collapsed snaking in dimensions
The function determines the front evolution via ; this function in turn depends on and . The term depends on due to the deviation of