Torsional oscillations of longitudinally inhomogeneous coronal loops

Torsional oscillations of longitudinally inhomogeneous coronal loops

T.V. Zaqarashvili & K. Murawski Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory (Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory), Kazbegi Ave. 2a, Tbilisi 0160, Georgia Group of Astrophysics and Gravity Theory, Institute of Physics, UMCS, ul. Radziszewskiego 10, 20-031 Lublin, Poland temury@genao.org
received / accepted
Key Words.:
Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) – Sun: corona – Sun: oscillations
offprints: T. Zaqarashvili
Abstract

Context:

Aims:We explore the effect of an inhomogeneous mass density field on frequencies and wave profiles of torsional Alfvén oscillations in solar coronal loops.

Methods:Dispersion relations for torsional oscillations are derived analytically in limits of weak and strong inhomogeneities. These analytical results are verified by numerical solutions, which are valid for a wide range of inhomogeneity strength.

Results:It is shown that the inhomogeneous mass density field leads to the reduction of a wave frequency of torsional oscillations, in comparison to that of estimated from mass density at the loop apex. This frequency reduction results from the decrease of an average Alfvén speed as far as the inhomogeneous loop is denser at its footpoints. The derived dispersion relations and wave profiles are important for potential observations of torsional oscillations which result in periodic variations of spectral line widths.

Conclusions:Torsional oscillations offer an additional powerful tool for a development of coronal seismology.

1 Introduction

Recent space-based observations revealed a presence of various kinds of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves and oscillations in the solar corona. These observations as well as modeling of MHD waves are important as these waves contribute to the coronal heating problem (Roberts roberts ()) and they may consist unique tool of a coronal seismology (Edwin & Roberts edwin83 (), Nakariakov & Ofman nakariakov2 ()). Fast kink (Aschwanden et al. aschwanden (), Nakariakov et al. nakariakov1 (), Wang & Solanki wang2 ()) and sausage (Nakariakov 2003, Pascoe et al. pascoe ()) as well as slow (de Moortel et al. 2002, Wang et al. 2003) magnetosonic oscillations were observed to be associated either with or without a solar flare. Analytical studies of these oscillations in coronal loops were carried on over the last few decades, amongst others, by Edwin & Roberts (1982, 1983), Poedts & Boynton (1996), Nakariakov (2003), Van Doorsselaere et al. (2004a,b), Ofman (2005), Verwichte et al. (2006) and Diáz et al. (2006).

Coronal loops act as natural wave guides for magnetosonic and torsional Alfvén waves. The later are purely azimuthal oscillations in cylindrical geometry. In the linear regime, Alfvén oscillations do not lead to mass density perturbations. As a result, contrary to magnetosonic waves, torsional Alfvén waves can be observed only spectroscopically. While propagating from the base of the solar corona along open magnetic field lines, these waves may lead to an increase of a spectral line width with height (Hassler et al. has (), Banerjee et al. banerjee (), Doyle et al. doyle ()). In closed magnetic field structures, such as coronal loops, these waves can be observed indirectly as periodic variations of non-thermal broadening of spectral lines (Zaqarashvili zaqarashvili ()).

Alongside magnetosonic waves, torsional oscillations can be used to infer, in the framework of coronal seismology, plasma properties inside oscillating loops. These oscillations are an ideal tool of coronal seismology as their phase speed depends alone on plasma quantities within the loop, while wave speeds of magnetosonic oscillations are influenced by plasma conditions in the ambient medium. Having known mass density within a loop, coronal seismology, that is based on torsional oscillations, enables to estimate a magnetic field strength. Torsional oscillations are potentially important in the context of rapid attenuation of coronal loop kink oscillations (Aschwanden et al. aschwanden (), Nakariakov et al. nakariakov1 ()). One of a few suggested mechanisms of the attenuation is a resonant absorption of fast magnetosonic kink waves by azimuthal Alfvén waves (Ruderman & Roberts 2002). This process may lead to a formation of torsional oscillations in the outer part of a loop. As a result, spotting torsional oscillations after the kink mode was attenuated would serve as an evidence of this attenuation mechanism.

A theoretical study of Alfvén oscillations in a coronal loop was carried on recently by Gruszecki et al. (2007) who considered impulsively generated oscillations in two-dimensional straight and curved magnetic field topologies. They found that lateral leakage of Alfvén waves into the ambient corona is negligibly small. However, mass density profiles were adopted homogeneous within the loop, while the real conditions there are much more complex.

Despite of significant achievements in a development of realistic models there is still much more effort required to develop our knowledge of wave phenomena in coronal loops. A goal of this paper is to study the influence of inhomogeneous mass density fields on spectrum of torsional oscillations. The paper is organized as follows. Analytical solutions for torsional oscillations in a longitudinally inhomogeneous coronal loop are presented in Sect. 2. The numerical results are showed in Sect. 3. Guidelines for potential observations of these oscillations are presented in Sect. 4. This paper is concluded by a discussion and a short summary of the main results in Sect. 5.

2 Analytical model of torsional oscillations

We consider a coronal loop of its inhomogeneous mass density and length , that is embedded in a uniform magnetic field . Small amplitude torsional Alfvén waves in a cylindrical coordinate system (, , ), in which plasma profiles depend on a longitudinal coordinate only, can be described by the following linear equations:

(1)
(2)

where and are the velocity and magnetic field components of Alfvén waves.

These equations can be easily cast into a single wave equation

(3)

where is the Alfvén speed. Assuming that , where is a wave frequency, we get the equation

(4)

For a trapped solution must satisfy line-tying boundary conditions which are implemented by setting

(5)

Equation (4) with condition (5) consists the well-known Sturm-Liuville problem which solution depends on the profile of . We model the coronal loop by a rarefied plasma at the loop apex (at ) and by a compressed plasma at the loop footpoints (). Specifically, we adopt

(6)

where is the mass density at the loop apex and is a parameter which defines a strength of the inhomogeneity. For the above mass density profile corresponds to a homogeneous loop, while for a larger value of the medium is more inhomogeneous. Figure 1 illustrates for . The mass density is described by Eq. (6) with kg m and Mm. Note that plasma is compressed at .

Figure 1: Spatial profile of the background mass density, , given by Eq. (6) with . The mass density and length are expressed in units of kg m and 1 Mm, respectively.

Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (4), we obtain

(7)

where . With a use of the notation

(8)

Eq. (7) can be rewritten in the form of Weber (parabolic cylinder) equation (Abramowitz & Stegun abramowitz ())

(9)

Standard solutions to this equation are called Weber (parabolic cylinder) functions (Abramowitz & Stegun abramowitz ())

(10)

where

(11)

and are respectively even and odd solutions to Eq. (9)

2.1 Two limiting solutions

Periodic solutions to Eq. (9) can be written analytically in the limiting cases: (a) for a large value of but a moderate value of ; (b) for a large but a moderate . The first (second) case corresponds to ().

2.1.1 Weakly inhomogeneous plasma

We consider first the case of a weakly inhomogeneous mass density field, i.e. . In this case we have

(12)

We adopt the following expansion (Abramowitz & Stegun abramowitz ()):

(13)

where

(14)
(15)

As a result of relation we have from Eq. (13)

(16)
(17)
(18)

The general solution to Eq. (9) is

(19)

where and are constants.

For a homogeneous loop, i.e. , we recognize the well known solution

(20)

Here wave number satisfies the following homogeneous dispersion relation:

(21)

Line-tying boundary conditions of Eq. (5) lead then to discrete values of the wave frequency, viz.

(22)

From this dispersion relation we infer that in a comparison to the loop with a homogeneous mass density distribution, , the weakly inhomogeneous mass density field results in a decrease of a wave frequency. This reduction is a consequence of the fact that the inhomogeneous loop is denser at its footpoints, so the average Alfvén speed is decreased. To show this, we compare the results for the inhomogeneous loop with the homogeneous loop with the same average density, so that both loops contain exactly the same mass (Andries et al. andries ()). We introduce a frequency difference

(23)

where

(24)

corresponds to the average mass density

(25)

Substituting Eq. (25) into Eq. (24), we obtain

(26)

From Eqs. (23) and (26) we find that . Here we infer that in comparison to the average mass density case the wave frequency is reduced, but as a result of the frequency reduction is small. This is in a disagreement with Fermat’s law and with the results of Murawski et al. (murawski ()) who showed that sound waves experience frequency increase in a case of a space-dependent random mass density field.

2.1.2 Strongly inhomogeneous plasma

We discuss now a strongly inhomogeneous mass density case, i.e. . This case corresponds to . In this limit we get (Abramowitz & Stegun abramowitz ())

(27)
(28)

where

(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)

with

(33)

The boundary conditions of Eq. (5) lead to the discrete frequency spectrum

(34)

Here we infer that the strongly inhomogeneous mass density field results in a significant decrease of a wave frequency in comparison to the case of the loop with the constant density, . This wave frequency decrease is a consequence of the fact that the inhomogeneous loop is denser at its footpoints. Substituting Eq. (34) into Eq. (23) we find that . This wave frequency decrease, in a comparison to the case of an average mass density is now in an agreement with Fermat’s law and with the results of Murawski et al. (2004).

3 Numerical results

Numerical simulations are performed for Eqs. (1), (2) with an adaptation of CLAWPACK which is a software package designed to compute numerical solutions to hyperbolic partial differential equations using a wave propagation approach (LeVeque 2002). The simulation region is covered by an uniform grid of numerical cells. We verified by convergence studies that this grid does not introduce much numerical diffusion and as a result it represents well the simulation region. We set reflecting boundary conditions at the left and right boundaries of the simulation region.

Figure 2: Numerically evaluated velocity profile at s for (solid line). This profile corresponds to the mode number . Note that as a result of strong inhomogeneity, departs from the sine-wave which corresponds to . The dashed line corresponds to Eq. (20) with .

Figure 2 shows a spatial profile of velocity for , drawn at s (solid line). This spatial profile results from the initial Gaussian pulse that was launched at in the center of the simulation region, at . It is noteworthy that the sine-wave profile of Eq. (20), which is valid for (dashed line), is distorted by the strong inhomogeneity which takes place for the case of .

Figure 3: Wave period vs. for the mode number . Diamonds correspond to the numerical solutions to Eqs. (1), (2). Solid lines are drawn with the use of the analytical solution to Eqs. (22) and  (34). The wave period is expressed in seconds.

As a consequence of the inhomogeneity wave period is altered. Figure 3 displays wave period vs. inhomogeneity parameter . Diamonds represent the numerical solutions while the solid lines correspond to the analytical solution to Eqs. (22) (top panel) and  (34) (bottom panel). Wave periods were obtained by Fourier analysis of the wave signals that were collected in time at the fixed spatial location, . It is discernible that the numerical data fits quite well to the analytical curves. A growth of wave period with results from wave scattering on centers of the inhomogeneity and it can be explained on simple physical grounds. In an inhomogeneous field wave frequency of the torsional oscillations can be estimated from the following formula:

(35)

where is the averaged Alfvén speed that is expressed by Eq. (24). Using we obtain

(36)

As grows with , the growth of with results in.

4 Potential observations of torsional oscillations

Torsional oscillations of a coronal loop may result in periodic variations of spectral line non-thermal broadening (expressed by a half line width, , hereafter HW) (Zaqarashvili zaqarashvili ()). For a homogeneous loop, HW can be expressed as

(37)

where is an amplitude of oscillations, is a wave length of the spectral line and is the light speed. Periodic variations of spectral line width depend on a height above the solar surface: a strongest variation corresponds to the wave antinode and the place of a lack of line width variation corresponds to the nodes (loop footpoints). Therefore, time series of spectroscopic observations may allow to determine a wave period. Knowing a length of the loop, we may estimate the Alfvén speed, which in turn gives a possibility to infer the magnetic field strength in the corona. We estimate the expected value of line width variations which result from torsional oscillations. For a typical coronal Alfvén speed of 800 km/s, an amplitude of linear torsional oscillation can be 40 km/s, which consists 5 of the Alfvén speed. For the ”green” coronal line Fe XIV (5303 ) from Eq. (37) we obtain

(38)

This value is about twice larger than the original thermal broadening of Fe XIV line. As a consequence, torsional oscillations can be detected in time series of the green coronal line spectra.

For a weakly inhomogeneous distribution of mass density along a loop, Eq. (22) enables to estimate the Alfvén speed at the loop apex with the help of the observed period of HW variation and a loop length. For a strongly inhomogeneous density profile along a loop, Eq. (34) shows that a wave period of torsional oscillations is not just the ratio of the loop length to the Alfvén speed, but it strongly depends on the rate of inhomogeneity, . Therefore, an additional effort is required in order to apply the method of coronal seismology for torsional oscillations. A spatial variation of mass density along the loop can be estimated by a direct measurement of spectral line intensity variation along the loop. Then, the estimated variation can be fitted to Eq. (6), and hence a value of can be inferred. Eq. (34) provides a value of at the loop summit. Another possibility is to collect time series of spectroscopic observations at different positions of the loop. A spatial variation of line width along the loop may be compared to the theoretical plot of (Fig. 2), which enables to estimate and consequently Alfvén speed at the loop apex (with a use of Eqs. (22) or (34)).

5 Discussion and summary

It is commonly believed that Alfvén waves are generated in the solar interior either by convection (granulation, supergranulation) or by any other kinds of plasma flow (differential rotation, solar global oscillations). Due to their incompressible nature, these waves may carry energy from the solar surface to the solar corona and therefore they may significantly contribute to coronal heating and solar wind acceleration. In closed magnetic loops the Alfvén waves may set up the standing torsional oscillations, while in opened magnetic structures these waves may propagate up to the solar wind. As a result, observations of Alfvén waves can be of vital importance to the problems of plasma heating and particle acceleration.

The Alfvén waves that propagate along open magnetic field lines may lead to a growth of a spectral line width with height (Hassler et al. has (), Banerjee et al. banerjee (); Doyle et al. doyle ()). However, at some altitudes the spectral line width reveals a sudden fall off (Harrison et al. har (); O’Shea et al. osh1 (); osh2 ()). This phenomenon was recently explained by resonant energy transfer into acoustic waves (Zaqarashvili et al. zaqarashvili1 ()).

On the other hand, the photospheric motions may set up torsional oscillations in closed magnetic loop systems, which can be observed spectroscopically as periodic variations of spectral line width (Zaqarashvili zaqarashvili ()). As a result, the observation of Alfvén waves can be used as an additional powerful tool of coronal seismology; the observed period and loop mean length enables to estimate the Alfvén speed within a loop, which in turn makes it possible to infer a mean magnetic field strength.

Besides their photospheric origin, torsional Alfvén waves can be generated in the solar corona in a process of resonant absorption of the global oscillations (Ruderman & Roberts ruderman (), Goossens et al. goossens (), Andries et al. andries (), Terradas et al. terradas ()). These oscillations may excite Alfvén waves in the outer inhomogeneous part of a loop, leading to attenuation of global oscillations and amplification of torsional oscillations. These Alfvén oscillations can be detected as periodic variations of spectral line width. As a consequence, observations of Alfvén waves can be a key for a determination of a damping mechanism of the loop global oscillations.

Dynamics of torsional Alfvén waves in a homogeneous loop can be easily solved. However, real coronal loops are longitudinally inhomogeneous, which leads to alteration of wave dynamics (Arregui et al. arregui (); arregui1 (), Van Doorsselaere et al. 2004a,b, Donnelly et al. donnelly (), Dymova & Ruderman dymova (), McEwan et al. mc ()). Therefore, the dynamics of Alfvén waves in longitudinally inhomogeneous coronal loops must be understood in order to provide analytical basis for potential observations of torsional oscillations.

In this paper we discussed by analytical and numerical means evolution of torsional Alfvén waves in an inhomogeneous mass density field. The analytical efforts resulted in dispersion relations which were obtained for a specific choice of an equilibrium mass density profile. These dispersion relations were written explicitly for two limiting cases: (a) weekly inhomogeneous and (b) strongly inhomogeneous mass density fields. From these dispersion relations we inferred that the inhomogeneity results in a wave frequency reduction in comparison to that of estimated at the loop summit. This analytical finding is supported by the numerical data which reveals that frequency reduction takes place outside the region of validity of the analytical approach. As a result of that we claim that a reduction of wave frequency is ubiquitous for the inhomogeneous mass density field we considered. This reduction is a consequence of wave scattering on inhomogeneity centers and it results from reduction of the average Alfvén speed within a coronal loop. This frequency reduction has important implications as far as wave observations are concerned. The analytical formulae can be used for estimation of coronal plasma parameters and therefore torsional Alfvén waves consist an additional powerful tool of coronal seismology.

Acknowledgments: The authors express their thanks to the referee, Prof. S. Poedts, for his stimulating comments. The work of T.Z. is supported by the grant of Georgian National Science Foundation GNSF/ST06/4-098. A part of this paper is supported by the ISSI International Programme ”Waves in the Solar Corona”.

References

  • (1964) Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I.A. 1964, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards)
  • (2005) Andries, J., Goossens, M., Hollweg, J. V., Arregui, I., & Van Doorsselaere, T. 2005, A&A, 430, 1109
  • (2005) Arregui, I., Van Doorsselaere, T., Andries, J., Goossens, M., & Kimpe, D. 2005, A&A, 441, 361
  • (2007) Arregui, I., Andries, J., Van Doorsselaere, T., Goossens, M., & Poedts, S. 2007, A&A, 463, 333
  • (1999) Aschwanden, M.J., Fletcher, L., Schrijver, C.J., & Alexander, D. 1999, ApJ, 520, 880
  • (1998) Banerjee, D., Teriaca, L., Doyle, J., & Wilhelm, K. 1998, A&A, 339, 208
  • (2002) De Moortel I., Ireland J., Walsh R. W. & Hood A. W. 2002, Sol. Phys., 209, 61
  • (2006) Diáz, A., Zaqarashvili, T.V., & Roberts, B. 2006, A&A, 455, 709
  • (2006) Donnelly, G.R., Diáz, A., & Roberts, B. 2006, A&A, 457, 707
  • (1998) Doyle, J., Banerjee, D. & Perez, M. 1998, Sol. Phys., 181, 91
  • (2006) Dymova, M. V., & Ruderman, M. S. 2006, A&A, 457, 1059
  • (1982) Edwin, P.M., & Roberts, B. 1982, Sol. Phys., 76, 239
  • (1983) Edwin, P.M., & Roberts, B. 1983, Sol. Phys., 88, 179
  • (2002) Goossens, M., Andries, J., & Aschwanden, M.J. 2002, A&A, 394, L39
  • (2007) Gruszecki, M., Murawski, K., Solanki, S., & Ofman, L. 2007, A&A, (in press)
  • (2002) Harrison, R.A., Hood, A.W., & Pike, C.D. 2002, A&A, 392, 319
  • (1990) Hassler, D.M., Rottman, G.J., Shoub, E.C., & Holzer, T.E. 1990, ApJ, 348, L77
  • (2002) LeVeque, R.J. 2002, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press
  • (2006) McEwan, M. P., Donnelly, G. R., Diaz, A. J. & Roberts, B. 2006, A&A, 460, 893
  • (2004) Murawski, K., Nocera, L. and Pelinovsky, E. N. 2004, Waves in Random Media, 14, 109
  • (1999) Nakariakov, V.M., Ofman, L., Deluca, E.E., Roberts, B., & Davila, J.M. 1999, Science, 285, 862
  • (2001) Nakariakov, V.M., & Ofman, L. 2001, A&A, 372, L53
  • (2003) Nakariakov, V.M. 2003, in The Dynamic Sun (Ed. B. Dwivedi), CUP
  • (2003) O’Shea, E., Banerjee, D., & Poedts, S. 2003, A&A, 400, 1065
  • (2005) O’Shea, E., Banerjee, D., & Doyle, J.G. 2005, A&A, 436, L35
  • (2005) Ofman, L. 2005, Adv. Space Res., 36, 1772
  • (2007) Pascoe, D.J., Nakariakov, V.M. & Arber, T.D. 2007, A&A, 461, 1149
  • (1996) Poedts, S. & Boynton, G.C. 1996, A&A, 306, 610
  • (2000) Roberts, B. 2000, Sol. Phys., 193, 139
  • (2002) Ruderman, M.S., & Roberts, B. 2002, ApJ, 577, 475
  • (2006) Terradas, J., Oliver, R., & Ballester, J.L. 2006, ApJ, 642, 533
  • (2006) Verwichte, E., Foullon, C., & Nakariakov, V.M. 2006, A&A, 449, 769
  • (2003) Wang, T., Solanki, S.K., Innes, D.E., Curdt, W., & Marsch, E. 2003, A&A, 402, L17
  • (2004) Wang, T.J., & Solanki S.K. 2004, A&A, 421, L33
  • (2003) Zaqarashvili, T.V., 2003, A&A, 399, L15
  • (2006) Zaqarashvili, T.V., Oliver, R., & Ballester, J.L. 2006, A&A, 456, L13
  • (2004a) Van Doorsselaere, T., Andries, J., Poedts, S. & Goossens, M., 2004a, ApJ, 606, 1223
  • (2004b) Van Doorsselaere, T., Debosscher, A., Andries, J. & Poedts, S., 2004b, A&A, 424, 1065
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
53363
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description