Topological Superfluids and BEC-BCS Crossover in Attractive Haldane-Hubbard Model

Topological Superfluids and BEC-BCS Crossover in Attractive Haldane-Hubbard Model

Yi-Cai Zhang Department of Physics and Center of Theoretical and Computational Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China    Zhihao Xu Institute of Theoretical Physics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China    Shizhong Zhang Department of Physics and Center of Theoretical and Computational Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
July 16, 2019
Abstract

Motivated by the recent realization of the Haldane model in shaking optical lattice, we investigate the effects of attractive interaction and BEC-BCS crossover in this model at and away from half filling. We show that, contrary to the usual -wave BEC-BCS crossover in the lattice, a topological superfluid with Chern number appears in an extended region of phase space for intermediate strength of the attractive interaction in the interaction-density plane. When inversion symmetry is broken, a new gapless topological state is realized. We also investigate the fluctuations in these superfluid phases and show that the Anderson-Bogoliubov mode is quadratic due to time-reversal symmetry breaking and the existence of an undamped Leggett mode in the strong coupling limit.

pacs:
03.75.Kk, 67.85.Lm, 71.10.Fd, 74.20.-z

Introduction. Cold atoms in optical lattices can be used to simulate important models in condensed matter physics due to their high controllability and versatility Bloch (); Lewenstein (). This was demonstrated beautifully by the recent realizations of Haldane Aoki (); Zhai (); Jotzu () and Hofstadter models using shaking lattice and Raman laser techniques, respectively. In these experiments, the existence of topological bands is verified using Bloch oscillations with either a Bose condensate Stuhl () or free fermions Aoki (). With tunable interactions in the optical lattices, these advances open new avenues for the controlled study of interaction effects in topological system and pave the way to the possibility of realizing fractional Chern insulators.

Perhaps by far the best studied interacting topological state is the fractional quantum Hall state, in which the strong Coulomb repulsion between electrons generate emergent fractional quasi-particles that obey abelian or non-abelian statistics Laughlin (); Zhang (); Jain (); Wen (); Neupert (); Tang (); Sun (). Naturally, with the discovery of topological insulators xiaoliang (); Kane (), a great deal of efforts has been to investigate its interacting counterparts Wang (); Gurarie (); Wu (); Hohenadler (). In the case of Haldane model, several recent studies have focused on the interplay between magnetic instabilities and the possible topological ground states in the case of repulsive interactions Kou (); He (); Maciejko (); Hickey (); Zheng (), as well as possible superconducting states with attractive interactions at half filling Liang ().

In this Letter, we consider the analogous of BEC-BCS crossover Zwerger2011 () in the attractive Haldane-Hubbard model. In contrast to usual BEC-BCS crossover, we found that away from half filling, there are extended regions of parameter space (interaction-density) for which a topological superfluid is the ground state. With increasing breaking of inversion symmetry, a gapless topological state intervenes before the system enters a trivial superfluid. We also consider the fluctuation effects on the ground states and show that the usual Anderson-Bogoliubov mode becomes quadratic in the absence of time-reversal symmetry and undamped Leggett mode appears in the strong coupling limit. Damping of the collective modes due to coupling to quasi-particles reaches maximum as one approaches phase transition critical point.

The Model. Consider a two-component Fermi gas with spin , interacting via an onsite attractive interaction , which can be modeled by the following Haldane-Hubbard model

(1)

where is the chemical potential. is the hopping amplitude between site and . For nearest neighbor hopping, and will be set equal to one in the following. For the next-nearest-neighbor hopping with for clockwise hopping and for anti-clockwise hopping Haldane () (see Fig. 1). Experimentally, is induced by a circular shaking of the optical lattice and except for , will break the time-reversal symmetry. describes the energy offset of the two sub-lattice with for sub-lattice and breaks the inversion symmetry of - sub-lattices. In the following, we use operators and to denote the fermion creation operator at sub-lattice and , and now index the unit cell, which consists of neighboring and sites. Now, introducing three Pauli matrix that describe the sub-lattice degrees of freedom, the non-interacting Hamiltonian can be conveniently written in momentum space as , where and . , , and , where and the vectors and are depicted in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: (Color online.) The panel (a): the honeycomb lattice in Haldane model. Here two dimensional vectors , and . , and . The red (black) sites denote sublattice A (B). The phase factor associated with next nearest neighbor anti-clock hopping is also labeled. The panel (b) is the Haldane’s topological phase diagram in plane. The panel (c) show two Fermi pockets around Dirac points and .

For half-filling and with , the system is either a trivial insulator for , or two copies of Chern insulator for because of spin degeneracy. Away from half filling, in general, the Fermi surface consists of two (particle or hole) pockets located at and and the system behaves as a metal. It is to be noted that the full Hamiltonian in Eq.(1) respects the spin rotation symmetry.

For , the Hamiltonian, Eq.(1), is also invariant under the particle-hole transformation, and for . For general , however, one needs to make further an inversion transformation and an interchange of the and sub-lattice, in order that the Hamiltonian remains invariant. Thus, for , which will be our focus in the following, it is only necessary to consider the case when (here means two particles per unit cell on average) and the chemical potential satisfies the relation  com1 (), where is the deviation from half filling. As a result, remains zero at half filling, irrespective of the strength of .

Mean-field phase diagram and Topological Superfluids. To take into account of the attractive interactions between opposite spins, we make the mean field decoupling in the Cooper channel and introduce . In the following, we take the following specific parameters: as energy unit, and . We have checked that for , is uniform and real, in which case, we shall denote it as . For , however, is real but differs for and sub-lattice, and we denote them as and , respectively com1 (). In the later case, the Bogoliubov-de Genne equation takes the form , with and

(2)

Upon diagonalizing , we obtain the excitation energies given by , where labels the two branches arising from the underlying - sub-lattice and denotes the particle (hole) branch due to particle-hole symmetry of . The particle-hole symmetry of BdG Hamiltonian implies . The thermodynamic potential (per unit cell) at zero temperature is then given by  com1 (). The mean field gaps are determined by setting and the chemical potential is fixed by requiring the average number of particles to be . We solve these three equations self-consistently for and . To further characterize the mean field phase diagram, we also compute the following quantities: (1) the Chern number Thouless () corresponding to the two quasi-hole bands with energies , (2) The existence or not of the edge states in a finite stripe, and (3) The existence or not of the bulk gap in the quasi-particle spectrum.

Figure 2: (Color online.) (a) Phase diagram for in the plane. The region within the black line (except the red line) is in topological superfluidity phase with Chern number . The exterior region of black line is topologically trivial (). The red line denotes the anomalous quantum Hall insulator () at half filling (). With increasing interaction, e.g. from point a to c, the system crosses the phase boundary. The inset shows chemical potentials and the pairing gaps () as functions of interaction strength for filling factor .

(i) . In this case, inversion symmetry is respected and is uniform. The phase diagram in the - plane is shown in Fig. 2. At half filling, the system is a Chern insulator with due to spin degeneracy for small attractive interaction (red line in Fig. 2). At a critical value , the system enters a topological superfluid state with which, however, occupies only a very small parameter regime before it enters the trivial superfluid, with (crossing phase boundary at ). Above half filling , the situation changes dramatically. The non-interacting system is metallic with two Fermi surfaces located around and points, which become superfluid due to attractive interactions. When is either small or large, the superfluid state is trivial and characterized by . However, for intermediate attractive interactions, the system enters a topological superfluid state with in a significantly enlarged portion of the phase space as compared to that at half filling. Inside the topological phase, a bulk gap is always present. In a finite stripe, a pair of edge states with opposite spin exist on both sides of the stripe and carries a net charge current but no spin current, as shown in inset of Fig. 3 (b).

The main feature of the mean field phase diagram can be understood from the following observations. It is well known that the topological transition is accompanied by the change of the topology of the energy band and at the transition point, energy gap will close. In the case when , the band closing occurs when at and points. As one increases the interaction , increases but decreases (see inset of Fig.2). As a result, in the intermediary value of , the condition is satisfied and a topological state emerges.

Figure 3: (Color online.) (a): and as a function of for (filling ). There exists two critical values and . When , the bulk gap remains finite, and the system is in the gapped topologically phase. Further increasing till , closes, the system is in the gapless topological phase. For , the system becomes topologically trivial superfluid. For , the system is in the gapless topological superfluid state. The Chern number is shown in inset. (b) Edge states in the boundary of strip geometry. (c) quasi-particle spectrum (blue) and edge states (red (black) for left (right) going ) in gapped topological phase for . (d) quasi-particle spectrum (blue) and edge states (red (black) for left (right) going ) in gappless topological phase for .

(ii) . In this case, the inversion symmetry is broken and . In addition to the trivial superfluid state for which , there appear two different topological superfluid states. When is small, a fully gapped topological state appears with [Fig.3 (a)], much the same as the case for with a pair of edge states [Fig.3 (c)]. As one increases , a gapless topological superfluid state appears when , for which the bulk gap becomes zero, while the gaps at and remain finite. In this case, the edge state remains. Further increasing , the system enters into a trivial superfluid state when , quasi-particle gap at or close and edge states disappear.

Explicitly, for , the closing of the bulk gap that determines is given by

(3)

For , one only needs to replace with . Further increasing , the gaps at or will close. The critical value of is given by setting with

(4)

For , we only need to interchange and in Eq.(4). The calculated Chern number as a function of are shown in the inset of Fig.3 (a), where it remains at for .

In the absence of inversion symmetry, it is possible for system to develop the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) pairing state Fulde (); Larkin (), in which the order parameter modulates periodically in real space Xu (); Cao (); Hu (). We have carried out inhomogeneous Bogoliubov-de Genne calculation in real space, and find no indication of its existence for our chosen parameters com1 (). We note that the spin rotational symmetry is respected, while the time reversal symmetry is broken for our model. Accordingly, the topological superfluidity phases found here belong to class C in BdG class, which are characterized by an even Chern number Ludwig1 (); Ludwig2 ().

Figure 4: (Color online). The collective excitation spectrum for various values of interaction strength (): (a) , (b) and (c) , corresponding to the three blue points a, b and c in Fig. 2, respectively. The momentum is chosen along -direction, . The shaded region denotes the quasi-particle continuum with its lowest boundary (red) given by . There are two types of collective excitations. The black line corresponds gapless Goldstone mode, while the blue line is the Leggett mode. (d-f) The spectral function of the Leggett mode for various values of interaction strength corresponding to that in (a-c). Note that the maximal damping occurs at the transition point (b,e).

Goldstone mode, Leggett mode and its damping. We now turn to the discussions of collective modes of the attractive Haldane-Hubbard model. For simplicity, we shall only consider the situation when and calculate the collective modes by considering Gaussian fluctuations around the mean field ground state for , with two Fermi surfaces around and points (see Fig.1). To go beyond mean field theory and calculate the mode frequencies, we expand the order parameters: and integrate out the fermions to arrive at the effective action for the order parameter fluctuation , with and is the bosonic Matsubara frequencies. defines the fluctuation vector in sublattice and is the fluctuation matrix whose explicit form is given in the supplementary material com1 (). The excitation energy is determined by the zeros of its determinant Melo ().

Because of the existence of two Fermi surfaces, in addition to the usual Goldstone (or Anderson-Bogoliubov) mode, which corresponds to the oscillation of total density, there appears additional Leggett mode Paramekanti (), which corresponds to the oscillation of the relative densities of the two Fermi pockets located at and points. In Fig. 4 (a-c), we show the excitation spectrums for three different values of , corresponding to a topological superfluid (point a in Fig.2), at the phase boundary (point b in Fig.2) and inside the trivial superfluid (point c in Fig.2). The shaded region corresponds to the quasi-particle continuum, which touches zero at the transition point, as expected for a quantum phase transition from topological to trivial superfluid state. In addition, there are a few further notable features of the collective modes.

Firstly, we note that the long wave length Goldstone excitation has a quadratic dispersion , unlike the usual linear dependence, typical of superfluid Melo (); Diener (). This is because for the Haldane-Hubbard model, Eq.(1), time-reversal symmetry is broken, so the low energy effective theory describing the total phase fluctuation contains the term , with the corresponding fluctuation field. On the other hand, for , inversion symmetry is respected and so the spatial derivative must be of the form . Consequently, one finds at long wave length. Furthermore, while the Goldstone mode is always present when , it can merge into the quasi-particle continuum and ceases to be a well-defined elementary excitation at larger (see Fig. 4 (a and b)).

Secondly, we observe that at strong coupling (), well-defined Leggett mode appears in the first Brillouin zone, while at weak coupling, it merges into the continuum and damps away. To investigate the damping of Leggett mode when it merges into the quasi-particle continuum, we calculate the spectral function of the relative phases fluctuations, , where and  com1 (). In Fig.(4 d-f), we show and found that the damping is maximum at the quantum critical point. The Leggett mode can be excited and detected by a differential modulation of the - sub-lattice Paramekanti ().

Discussions. With the recent realization of Haldane model in cold atoms, it is possible now to study the topological superfluid states and their quantum phase transitions discussed here. Unlike the non-interacting Haldane model in which the quantum phase transitions can be monitored by using Block oscillation and the band mapping technique, here the phase transition is signalled by the closing of quasi-particle gap which will have dramatic effects on the dynamic structure factor that can be measured experimentally with Bragg spectroscopy. The Leggett modes in multi-band superconductor MgB have been observed experimentally by tunneling spec troscopy techniques Ponomarev2004 (), Raman spectroscopy Blumberg2007 (), and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy Mou2015 (). Here we expect that for neutral atoms, the Leggett modes and their damping can be measured by the Bragg spectroscopy or modulation spectroscopy.

Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Bohm-Jung Yang for useful discussions. This research is supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council (General Research Fund, HKU 17306414 and Collaborative Research Fund, HKUST3/CRF/13G) and the Croucher Foundation under the Croucher Innovation Award.

References

  • (1) I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  • (2) M. Lewenstein et al., Advances in Physics 56, 243 (2007).
  • (3) T. Oka and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406 (2009).
  • (4) W. Zheng and H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. A 89, 061603 (2014).
  • (5) G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Nature 515, 237 (2014).
  • (6) B. K. Stuhl, H.I Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina and I. B. Spielman, arXiv:1502.02496(2015).
  • (7) R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983).
  • (8) S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 82 (1989).
  • (9) J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989).
  • (10) X. G. Wen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B6, 1711 (1992).
  • (11) T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236804 (2011).
  • (12) E. Tang, J. W. Mei, and X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236802 (2011).
  • (13) K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. D. Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236803 (2011).
  • (14) X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2010).
  • (15) M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  • (16) Z. Wang, X. L. Qi, S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256803 (2010).
  • (17) V. Gurarie, Phys. Rev. B 83, 085426 (2011).
  • (18) D. Zheng, G. M. Zhang, and C. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205121 (2011).
  • (19) M. Hohenadler, Y. Meng, T. C. Lang, S. Wessel, A. Muramatsu, and F. F. Assaad, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115132(2012).
  • (20) C. Hickey, P. Rath, and A. Paramekanti, Phys. Rev. B 91, 134414 (2015).
  • (21) W. Zheng, H. Shen, Z. Wang, and H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. B 91, 161107(2015).
  • (22) J. He, S. P. Kou, Y. Liang, and S. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 83,205116 (2011).
  • (23) J. He, Y. H. Zong, S. P. Kou, Y. Liang, and S. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035127 (2011).
  • (24) J. Maciejko and A. Ruegg, Phys. Rev. B 88, 241101(R) (2013).
  • (25) Y. Liang, J. He, Y. J. Wu, Y. X. Zhu, and S. P. Kou, arXiv:1305. 1294v1(2013).
  • (26) W. Zwerger, Ed. BCS-BEC Crossover and the Unitary Fermi Gas, Lecture Note in Physics 836, Springer, 2011.
  • (27) F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  • (28) See supplementary materials for detailed discussions on the particle-hole symmetry of Haldane model, the mean field formalism, the absence of FFLO states in Hubbard-Haldane model and the path integral formalism for calculating the collective modes.
  • (29) D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982).
  • (30) P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964).
  • (31) A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1994) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965)].
  • (32) Y. Xu, R. L. Chu, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 136402 (2014).
  • (33) Y. Cao, S. H. Zou, X. J. Liu, S. Yi, G. L. Long, and H. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 115302 (2014).
  • (34) H. Hu, L. Dong, Y. Cao, H. Pu, and X. J. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033624 (2014).
  • (35) A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
  • (36) S. Ryu, A. Schnyder, A. Furusaki and A. Ludwig, New J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010).
  • (37) E. Zhao and A. Paramekanti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 230404 (2006).
  • (38) J. R. Engelbrecht, M. Randeria and C. A. R. S. Melo, Phys. Rev. B. 55, 15153 (1997).
  • (39) R. B. Diener, R. Sensarma, and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. A 77, 023626 (2008).
  • (40) Ya. G. Ponomarev, et. al, Solid State Commun. 129, 85 (2004).
  • (41) G. Blumberg, A. Mialitsin, B. S. Dennis, M.V. Klein, N. D. Zhigadlo, and J. Karpinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 227002 (2007).
  • (42) D. Mou, R. Jiang, V. Taufour, R. Flint, S. L. Bud?ko, P. C. Canfield, J. S. Wen, Z. J. Xu, G. Gu, and A. Kaminski, Phys. Rev. B 91, 140502(R) (2015).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
114069
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description