Top Quark Theoretical Cross Sections and p_{T} and Rapidity Distributions

Top Quark Theoretical Cross Sections and and Rapidity Distributions

Nikolaos Kidonakis Kennesaw State University, Physics #1202, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA
Abstract

I present theoretical results for the top quark pair total cross section, and for the top quark transverse momentum and rapidity distributions at Tevatron and LHC energies. I also present results for single top quark production in the - and -channels and also via associated production with a boson. The calculations include approximate NNLO corrections that are derived from NNLL soft-gluon resummation.

I Introduction

The top quark is a very important part of the collider programs at the Tevatron and the LHC. Top quarks have been produced via top-antitop pair production and also via single top production at both colliders. The partonic processes at LO for top-antitop pair production are , dominant at the Tevatron, and , dominant at the LHC. The leading-order (LO) diagrams are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: LO and diagrams.

Single top quark production can proceed via the -channel processes, the -channel processes, and via associated production of a top quark with a boson. The LO diagrams for these proceses are shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2: LO -channel, -channel, and diagrams.

The -channel processes, and , are dominant at both the Tevatron and the LHC. The -channel processes, , are small at the Tevatron and LHC. The associated production of a top quark with a boson, , has a very small cross section at the Tevatron, but is significant at the LHC. A related process to production is the associated production of a top quark with a charged Higgs boson in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, .

In Sec. 2 we discuss higher-order corrections for both and single-top production and identify soft-gluon corrections which are important near partonic threshold and contribute the dominant higher-order corrections in the hadronic cross section. In Sec. 3 we give results for the total top-antitop pair cross section. In Sec. 4 we show results for the top quark transverse momentum, , distribution. In Sec. 5 we give results for the top quark rapidity, , distribution and the top quark forward-backward asymmetry. In Sec. 6 we present results for single top quark production via the channel, in Sec. 7 via the channel, and in Sec. 8 via associated production with a . We conclude in Sec. 9 with a summary.

Ii Higher-order corrections

QCD corrections are significant for top pair and single top quark production and are known fully at next-to-leading order (NLO). Soft-gluon corrections from emission of soft (low-energy) gluons are an important contributor to the QCD corrections. These soft-gluon corrections are dominant near threshold and they are of the form with and the kinematical distance from threshold.

We can resum these soft corrections via factorization and renormalization-group evolution. At next-to-leading-logarithm (NLL) accuracy this requires one-loop calculations in the eikonal approximation. Complete results now exist at next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm (NNLL) accuracy, using the two-loop soft anomalous dimension matrices for the corresponding partonic subprocesses.

An approximate next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) cross section is derived from the expansion of the resummed cross section NKtop (); NKdpf2011 (). The calculation is at the differential cross section level using single-particle-inclusive (1PI) kinematics. We note that 1PI kinematics refer to partonic threshold, not just absolute threshold.

The threshold approximation works very well not only for Tevatron but also for LHC energies because partonic threshold is still important at the LHC: there is only a 1% difference between first-order approximate and exact corrections which translates into less than 1% difference between NLO approximate and exact cross sections.

For our best prediction for the total cross section and differential distributions we add the NNLO approximate corrections from NNLL resummation to the exact NLO results.

Iii cross section

Figure 3: Cross section for production at the Tevatron.

We begin with the total top-antitop pair cross section. In Fig. 3 we show results for the exact NLO and the approximate NNLO cross section NKtop () at Tevatron energy and compare with recent results from the CDF CDFtt () and D0 D0tt () Collaborations. The left plot shows that the NNLO approximate cross section describes the data better than NLO, while the plot on the right shows the approximate NNLO result together with the theoretical uncertainty, which is derived by varying the scale by a factor of two around the central value and adding this uncertainty in quadrature with the uncertainty from the MSTW2008 NNLO parton distribution functions (pdf) MSTW () at 90% C.L.

The cross section at the Tevatron for a top quark mass of 173 GeV is

where the first uncertainty is from scale variation and the second is from the pdf. The NNLO approximate corrections enhance the cross section by 7.8% over the NLO result (with the same pdf).

Figure 4: Scale dependence of the cross section at the Tevatron.

In Fig. 4 we show the scale dependence of the cross section at the Tevatron. The plot shows that the LO result displays a large dependence on the scale. The NLO cross section has a much milder dependence and the NNLO approximate result significantly reduces the dependence even further.

Figure 5: NLO and NNLO and dependence of the cross section at the Tevatron.

Figure 5 shows the separate dependence of the NLO and approximate NNLO cross sections on independent variations of the factorization scale and the renormalization scale . We observe a reduction at NNLO in the independent scale variations as well.

Figure 6: Cross section for production at the LHC.

In Fig. 6 we show the cross section at the LHC at 7 TeV energy and compare with recent results from the ATLAS ATLAStt () and CMS CMStt () Collaborations. The left plot shows that the NNLO approximate cross section is in better agreement with the data than the NLO result. The plot on the right shows the central NNLO approximate cross section as before together with the uncertainty from scale variation and pdf errors.

The cross section for a top quark mass of 173 GeV at the LHC with 7 TeV energy is

while the corresponding result at 14 TeV energy is

The NNLO approximate corrections contribute an enhancement over NLO of 7.6% at 7 TeV and 8.0% at 14 TeV.

Figure 7: Cross section for production at and colliders.

Figure 7 plots the theoretical cross sections versus collider energy for and collisions together with experimental measurements of the cross section. The Tevatron and LHC data are in very good agreement with theory.

Iv Top quark transverse momentum distributions

The top quark transverse momentum distribution, , at the Tevatron and at the LHC at 7 TeV is plotted in Fig. 8. NLO and approximate NNLO results NKtop () are displayed for the central scale value as well as for and .

Figure 8: Top quark distribution at the Tevatron and the LHC.

The NNLO soft-gluon corrections enhance the distribution but they do not significantly change the shape in the range shown. The scale dependence is reduced relative to NLO, in line with the reduction that was observed for the total cross section.

V Top quark rapidity distributions and forward-backward asymmetry

Figure 9: Top quark rapidity distribution at the Tevatron and the LHC.

The top quark rapidity distribution, , at the Tevatron and at the LHC at 7 TeV is plotted in Fig. 9. Again, NLO and approximate NNLO results NKrap () are displayed for the central scale value as well as for and . The NNLO soft-gluon corrections enhance the rapidity distribution and reduce the scale dependence relative to NLO but they do not significantly change the shape in the rapidity range shown.

The rapidity distribution enters into the definition of the forward-backward asymmetry,

The channel is symmetric at all orders. The channel on the other hand is asymmetric starting at NLO. The asymmetry is significant at the Tevatron. The theoretical result for the top quark asymmetry at the Tevatron at approximate NNLO is where the uncertainty indicated is from scale variation. The theoretical value is much smaller than current experimental values.

Vi Single top quark production - channel

The -channel production of a single top quark proceeds via the exchange of a spacelike boson. The process is dominant among single top channels at both Tevatron and LHC energies.

For a top quark mass of 173 GeV the approximate NNLO -channel single top cross sections NKtch () are

For -channel single antitop production the cross section at the Tevatron is the same as for top. However, the single antitop production cross section at the LHC in the channel is different:

Figure 10: -channel cross section at hadron colliders.

The -channel combined cross section (single top + single antitop) is plotted versus energy in Fig. 10 together with recent measurements at the Tevatron CDFt (); D0t () and the LHC ATLASt (); CMSt (). Again the Tevatron and LHC results are consistent with theory.

Vii Single top quark production - channel

The -channel production of a single top quark proceeds via the exchange of a timelike boson. This process has the smallest cross section among single top channels at LHC energies.

For a top quark mass of 173 GeV the approximate NNLO -channel single top cross sections NKsch () are

The NNLO approximate corrections provide an enhancement over NLO (with the same pdf) of 15% at the Tevatron and 13% at the LHC, and thus they have a very significant impact.

The -channel single antitop production cross section at the Tevatron is the same as for top. However, the -channel single antitop production cross section at the LHC is different:

Viii Associated production

The associated production of a top quark with a boson, , is negligible at the Tevatron but important at the LHC. For a top quark mass of 173 GeV the approximate NNLO cross section NKtW () is

The NNLO approx corrections increase the NLO cross section by %. The cross section for production is identical to that for top.

A related process is the associated production of a top quark with a charged Higgs in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. In that case the NNLO approximate corrections increase the NLO cross section by to %. Another related process is production at large NKdpf2011 (); KGS ().

Ix Summary

We have discussed NNLL soft-gluon resummation for top quark pair and single top production. We have derived NNLO approximate cross sections from the expansion of the NNLL resummed cross section. Numerical results for the production cross section have been presented at both Tevatron and LHC energies. The NNLO approximate corrections reduce the scale dependence of the cross section.

The top quark and rapidity distributions have also been presented and, again, the NNLO soft-gluon corrections enhance the cross section and reduce the scale dependence but they do not significantly affect the shape of the distributions. The theoretical top quark forward-backward asymmetry has also been calculated and is found to be significantly smaller than observed at the Tevatron.

The cross sections for -channel and -channel single top production as well as the associated production of a top quark with a boson have also been presented at both Tevatron and LHC.

The NNLO approximate corrections for top pair and single top production are significant at both the Tevatron and LHC colliders and they reduce the theoretical uncertainty. The theoretical results are in good agreement with experimental measurements from CDF and D0 at the Tevatron, and from ATLAS and CMS at the LHC.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY 0855421.

References

  • (1) N. Kidonakis, Phys. Rev. D 82, 114030 (2010) [arXiv:1009.4935 [hep-ph]].
  • (2) N. Kidonakis, in DPF-2011, arXiv:1109.1578 [hep-ph].
  • (3) CDF Collaboration, Conf. Note 9913.
  • (4) D0 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 80, 071102(R) (2009) [arXiv:0903.5525 [hep-ex]]; Phys. Rev. D 82, 032002 (2010) [arXiv:0911.4286 [hep-ex]]; arXiv:1105.5384v1 [hep-ex].
  • (5) A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne, and G. Watt, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009) [arXiv:0901.0002 [hep-ph]].
  • (6) ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2011-100.
  • (7) CMS Collaboration, JHEP 07, 049 (2011) [arXiv:1105.5661 [hep-ex]].
  • (8) N. Kidonakis, Phys. Rev. D 84, 011504 (2011) [arXiv:1105.5167 [hep-ph]].
  • (9) N. Kidonakis, Phys. Rev. D 83, 091503 (2011) [arXiv:1103.2792 [hep-ph]].
  • (10) CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112005 (2010) [arXiv:1004.1181 [hep-ex]].
  • (11) D0 Collaboration, arXiv:1105.2788 [hep-ex].
  • (12) ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2011-088.
  • (13) CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1106.3052 [hep-ex].
  • (14) N. Kidonakis, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054028 (2010) [arXiv:1001.5034 [hep-ph]].
  • (15) N. Kidonakis, Phys. Rev. D 82, 054018 (2010) [arXiv:1005.4451 [hep-ph]].
  • (16) N. Kidonakis and A. Sabio Vera, JHEP 02, 027 (2004) [hep-ph/0311266]; N. Kidonakis and R.J. Gonsalves, in DPF-2011, arXiv:1109.2817 [hep-ph].
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
137819
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description