Time-Reversal-Symmetric Single-Photon Wave Packets for Free-Space Quantum Communication

Time-Reversal-Symmetric Single-Photon Wave Packets for Free-Space Quantum Communication

Abstract

Readout and retrieval processes are proposed for efficient, high-fidelity quantum state transfer between a matter qubit, encoded in the level structure of a single atom or ion, and a photonic qubit, encoded in a time-reversal-symmetric single-photon wave packet. They are based on controlling spontaneous photon emission and absorption of a matter qubit on demand in free space by stimulated Raman adiabatic passage. As these processes do not involve mode selection by high-finesse cavities or photon transport through optical fibers, they offer interesting perspectives as basic building blocks for free-space quantum-communication protocols.

pacs:
42.50.Pq,03.67.Bg,42.50.Ct,42.50.Ex

High-fidelity quantum state transfer between single photons acting as “flying qubits” and matter qubits, such as atoms or ions, acting as “stationary” memory “qubits” is a crucial process for quantum technological applications. It is an important elementary readout and retrieval process in quantum-communication protocols Nielsen and Chuang (2000) in which quantum information exchange between distant stationary matter qubits is achieved by photon transport through optical fibers or through free-space channels. Whereas fiber based quantum communication offers advantages for local networks Kimble (2008) free-space implementations are of special interest for the realization of a future worldwide satellite-based quantum-communication network Ursin et al. (2007).

Motivated by its significance for quantum communication the realization of efficient light matter coupling in free space has been subject of recent experimental Fischer et al. (2014); Lindlein et al. (2007); Tey et al. (2008) and theoretical Stobińska et al. (2009) investigations. Although efficient, high-fidelity quantum state transfer from a matter qubit to a photonic qubit can be achieved by spontaneous photon emission, realizing the reverse process in free space is a formidable experimental challenge. Exploiting time-reversal symmetry it has been shown that almost perfect absorption of a single photon in free space is possible provided the single-photon wave packet has an exponentially growing temporal envelope Stobińska et al. (2009). An interesting probabilistic method for generating and shaping a single-photon wave packet with an exponentially rising envelope has been developed recently Kolchin et al. (2008); Liu et al. (2014). The inherent probabilistic nature of the procedure stems from the usage of a photon source based on spontaneous four-wave mixing Balić et al. (2005) and the shaping of the wave packet by using electro-optical amplitude modulation. However, the probabilistic nature of these processes is a disadvantage for applications concerning readout and retrieval processes of quantum information and procedures capable of performing such tasks on demand in a deterministic way are favorable.

In fiber and cavity based quantum-communication schemes a proposal to overcome the obstacles of probabilistic photon generation and probabilistic wave packet shaping has been developed by Cirac. et al. Cirac et al. (1997) and has been implemented experimentally by Ritter et al. Ritter et al. (2012), recently. In this experiment a laser pulse controls the interaction of a single trapped atom with the radiation field inside a high-finesse cavity. Exploiting the extreme cavity-induced mode selection of the high-finesse cavity and the resulting vacuum Rabi oscillations governing the coherent spontaneous photon emission and absorption processes, a matter qubit can be converted efficiently on demand to a single-photonic qubit prepared in a time-reversal-symmetric wave packet state. Due to this symmetry of the wave packet the quantum information stored in this single photon can be retrieved with high fidelity after transmission through an optical fiber and stored in another matter qubit.

However, this efficient readout and retrieval procedure is not suitable for free-space quantum-communication protocols which do not involve any strong mode selection mechanism because in free space the spontaneous photon emission process is of a considerably different nature. It is no longer governed by coherent vacuum Rabi oscillations but by an approximate exponential decay of the matter qubit. This decay reflects the extreme multimode aspects of the spontaneous emission process. In view of these differences the natural question arises whether it is possible to design efficient, high-fidelity readout and retrieval procedures for photon-mediated quantum information transfer in free space on demand.

In the following it is demonstrated that such procedures can be realized by appropriately controlling the spontaneous emission and absorption of a single photon by a matter qubit with the help of stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) Bergmann et al. (1998). Thereby, instead of suppressing the multimode aspects of the matter-field interaction by a high-finesse cavity these features are exploited for controlling the generation and absorption of a time-reversal-symmetric single-photon wave packet by a material qubit. Recent experiments Maiwald et al. (2012); Fischer et al. (2014) demonstrate that in free-space scenarios material qubits can be trapped in the foci of parabolic cavities thus enabling efficient and well directed photon emission and absorption. Combining these trapping techniques with these readout and retrieval processes efficient free-space quantum-communication protocols can be designed for high-fidelity photon-mediated quantum state transfer between distant matter qubits.

Figure 1: (color online). Schematic representation of a free-space quantum state transfer protocol as described in the text.

We consider a physical setup as depicted schematically in Fig. 1. Two atoms or ions are trapped in the focal points of two distant opposite parabolic cavities whose focal length is large and whose surface roughness is small compared with typical optical wavelengths. The relevant atomic level structure is depicted in Fig. 2. The states and are radiatively stable or metastable ground states constituting a logical qubit. The state is an ancillary level which is used to transfer coherently population between states and by a STIRAP process. The (classical) laser pulses performing the STIRAP process are characterized by the time dependent Rabi frequencies and . Preparing initially a trapped atom in state an appropriate STIRAP-controlled spontaneous decay process from level to the ground state with the spontaneous decay rate is capable of generating a time-reversal-symmetric single-photon wave packet. For this purpose it is important that state can decay only to state and not to state or to any other state. Preparing initially a trapped atom in state this time-symmetric single-photon wave packet can be absorbed again almost perfectly by an appropriately tailored STIRAP-assisted photon absorption process. These two processes are the basic building blocks of our proposed high-fidelity readout and retrieval processes.

In the dipole and rotating wave approximation the interaction of an atom in the focus of a parabolic cavity with the radiation field is described by the Hamiltonian with the Hamiltonians of the free radiation field and of the free atom . The modes of the quantized radiation field inside a parabolic cavity are characterized by the orthonormal mode functions with frequencies and by the corresponding photonic destruction and creation operators and . Describing the laser fields inducing the STIRAP process classically the interaction between the atom and the radiation field is characterized by the Hamiltonian

(1)

The time dependent Rabi frequencies and characterize the interaction of these laser fields with the atom and , are their detunings from resonance. The positive frequency part of the electric field operator describing the quantized modes of the radiation field is given by

(2)

The dipole matrix element of the atomic transition is denoted and is the position of the atom. It is assumed that the spontaneous decay of the state is negligible as this state is not populated significantly during the STIRAP process. This makes the spontaneous decay process from the state to the state highly controllable and robust Bergmann et al. (1998); (14).

Figure 2: (color online). Basic atomic level scheme as described in the text.

In order to describe our high-fidelity readout and retrieval processes we focus on atom-field states of the form initially prepared at time . In the readout process which involves the generation of a time-symmetric single-photon wave packet initially the atom is prepared in state and the radiation field in the vacuum state. Analogously, in the retrieval process, which involves almost perfect absorption of this wave packet, initially the atom is prepared in state and the radiation field in this one-photon wave packet state. For these initial states the time dependent Schrödinger equation can be solved by the ansatz

(3)

with constituting a linear superposition of the atomic states , , , and . Taking into account the mode structure inside a parabolic cavity with large focal length Trautmann et al. (2014); Alber et al. (2013) the one photon probability amplitudes can be eliminated from the Schrödinger equation. In the interaction picture we obtain the following effective inhomogeneous Schrödinger equation for the atomic state

(4)

The term

describes the coherent driving of the atomic state by a freely evolving incoming single-photon wave packet. Similar to Mollow (1975) the anti-Hermitian part of the Hamiltonian takes into account the spontaneous decay of the atomic state .

For adiabatically eliminating the state from the Schrödinger equation (4) let us assume that , that the Rabi frequencies are of the form and () and that the laser fields are sufficiently intense (19); Bergmann et al. (1998); (14), i.e. . Under these conditions the adiabatic approximation applies Born and Fock (1928) and the atomic state can follow the dark state , i.e. . Using Eq. (4) the amplitude fulfills the relation

In order to generate a time-symmetric single-photon wave packet in a readout process we start from the initial states and with and . In this case the last term in Eq. (LABEL:Eq_diff_adiabatic) does not contribute because the incoming photon field is in the vacuum state. Thus, the solution of Eq.(LABEL:Eq_diff_adiabatic) with the initial condition is given by

(6)

The envelope of the emerging single-photon wave packet is determined by the atomic amplitude . From Eq.(6) one obtains the relation

(7)

Hereby, has to be chosen in such a way that . For the generation of a time-symmetric single-photon wave packet a possible choice of the atomic amplitude is given by

(8)

with and being sufficiently large. The corresponding shapes of the STIRAP pulses and are determined by Eq. (7).

Propagation of the generated single-photon wave packet to another far distant parabolic cavity through free space can be described by semi-classical methods Maslov and Fedoriuk (1981). Using the results derived in Ref. Trautmann et al. (2014) the driving term entering Eq. (LABEL:Eq_diff_adiabatic) is determined by the quantum state of the first atom, i.e. with denoting the time delay caused by photon propagation. The complex valued constant with describes a possible phase shift and photon loss (with loss probability ) during this propagation.

In order to validate the results obtained from the adiabatic approximation we have solved Eq. (4) numerically. The corresponding probability of finding the first atom in state during the generation of the wave packet is depicted in Fig. 3. These numerical results demonstrate that a time-symmetric single-photon wave-packet can be tailored provided the Rabi frequency is sufficiently high. Another quantity of interest is the success probability for absorbing the wave packet generated by the first atom and for transferring the population of the second atom from the initial state to state provided the photon is not lost during transmission, i.e. . This probability is depicted in Fig. 4. Hereby we assume that the readout and retrieval processes are performed with the same Rabi frequency . With increasing this probability quickly approaches unity. Thus, our scheme leads to almost perfect absorption of the wave packet if is large in comparison with the spontaneous decay rate . Furthermore, numerical calculations confirm that the maximal probability of finding the atoms in state scales with . For and the parameters chosen in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, for example, its values are smaller than . This is valid for STIRAP-assisted photon emission as well as absorption. Thus, the assumption of a negligible population of the ancillary atomic level can be satisfied easily for sufficiently high Rabi frequencies.

Figure 3: (color online). Time dependence of the probability of detecting an atom in state during the generation of the single-photon wave packet for several Rabi frequencies : The parameters are , and The result of the adiabatic approximation is denoted by ’ideal’.
Figure 4: (color online). Success probability of absorption of the single-photon wave packet generated by the readout procedure and its dependence on the Rabi frequency provided the photon is not lost during transmission (i.e. ): The parameters are , and .
Figure 5: (color online). Advanced protocol for quantum state transfer in free space: The qubit states are denoted by and (colored in orange). The nondegenerated ground state of the atom is denoted by . The red arrows indicate the relevant spontaneous decay and photon absorption processes. The black arrows indicate the relevant STIRAP processes.

Based on these results quantum state transfer protocols suitable for free-space communication can be constructed. In the simplest protocol the previously discussed level structure is used for encoding a qubit in the atomic levels and of an atom trapped in the focus of a parabolic cavity. The readout of this qubit is performed by the proposed STIRAP-assisted spontaneous photon emission process. Thus, if this atom is prepared initially in state it is transferred to state after this spontaneous photon emission process. Alternatively, if it is prepared initially in state it remains in this state and no photon is emitted. Correspondingly, if initially the atom is in a linear superposition of both states this qubit state is coherently mapped onto a coherent superposition of the presence and absence of a single photon. After photon propagation through free space the retrieval of this photonic qubit is accomplished by the time reversed STIRAP-assisted process acting on a second atom initially prepared in state . This way it is possible to store the original qubit again in a second distant matter qubit positioned in the focal point of another parabolic cavity. However, this simple procedure has the drawback that photon loss cannot be detected by the receiver and leads to a significant reduction of the fidelity of the original qubit state.

This problem can be circumvented by an advanced free-space quantum-communication protocol whose atomic excitation scheme is depicted in Fig. 5. In this protocol the photonic qubit is encoded in the polarization state of the generated single-photon wave packet and the matter qubit may be formed by Zeeman sublevels of a degenerate metastable atomic state. After photon propagation the retrieval of this photonic qubit and storage in another matter qubit is achieved with the corresponding time-reversed STIRAP assisted single-photon absorption process. In this protocol photon loss only affects the success probability of the retrieval process and not the fidelity of the retrieved qubit state. Provided the transmission of the generated single-photon wave packet is successful the quantum state of the first atom is transferred to the distant second atom with fidelity arbitrarily close to unity if the Rabi frequency is sufficiently large. Typical experimental imperfections, such as finite sizes of the parabolas or real surface properties reduce the success probability but leave the fidelity unaltered Trautmann et al. (2014).

Atomic level structures suitable for implementing such a scheme are available in alkaline-earth and alkaline-earth-like atoms, for example. These atoms offer ground states with vanishing electronic spin and are therefore of interest for quantum information processing Daley et al. (2008); Gorshkov et al. (2009) and for realizations of optical frequency standards Katori et al. (2003). For this scheme isotopes with vanishing nuclear spin are of particular interest due to their nondegenerate ground states. The matter qubit may be encoded in long-lived metastable states and the single-photon wave packet may be generated by dipole allowed optical transitions from suitable excited states to the nondegenerate ground state of the atom. The presence of such a nondegenerate ground state is necessary in order to ensure that the excited states decay to only one state of the level structure. Successful cooling and trapping of such atoms, such as and , has already been reported Xu et al. (2003); Takasu et al. (2003). In these neutral atoms also suitable level schemes can be selected (27); (28).

In conclusion, we have proposed a STIRAP-assisted method for generating time-symmetric single-photon wave packets on demand by spontaneous decay in free space. With the help of these single-photon wave packets high-fidelity quantum state transfer between distant matter qubits by photon propagation in free space can be implemented. In contrast to already known quantum state transfer schemes our protocol does not require high-finesse cavities and optical fibers so that it offers interesting perspectives for applications in free-space quantum communication.

Acknowledgements.
Stimulating discussions with G. Birkl are acknowledged. This work is supported by CASED III, DAAD, the BMBF Project Q.com, and by the DFG as part of the CRC 1119 CROSSING. G.S.A thanks the wonderful hospitality of MPL, Erlangen.

References

  1. M. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge, Univ.Press, 2000).
  2. H. J. Kimble, Nature 453, 1023 (2008).
  3. R. Ursin et al., Nature Physics 3, 481 (2007).
  4. M. Fischer et al., Appl. Phys. B 117, 797 (2014).
  5. N. Lindlein et al., Laser Physics 17, 927 (2007).
  6. M. K. Tey et al., Nature Physics 4, 924 (2008).
  7. M. Stobińska, G. Alber,  and G. Leuchs, EPL 86, 14007 (2009).
  8. P. Kolchin, C. Belthangady, S. Du, G.Y. Yin,  and S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 103601 (2008).
  9. C. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 133601 (2014).
  10. V. Balić, D. A. Braje, P. Kolchin, G.Y. Yin,  and S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183601 (2005).
  11. J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H.J. Kimble,  and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
  12. S. Ritter et al., Nature 484, 195 (2012).
  13. K. Bergmann, H. Theuer,  and B. Shore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1003 (1998).
  14. P. A. Ivanov, N. V. Vitanov, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 053412 (2005).
  15. R. Maiwald et al., Phys. Rev. A 86, 043431 (2012).
  16. N. Trautmann et al.Phys.Rev.A 90, 063814 (2014).
  17. G. Alber, J.Z. Bernád, M. Stobińska, L.L. Sánchez-Soto,  and G. Leuchs, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023825 (2013).
  18. B. Mollow, Physical Review A 12, 1919 (1975).
  19. The spontaneous decay rate of level can be incorporated in this condition by choosing .
  20. M. Born and V. Fock, Z. Physik 51, 165 (1928).
  21. V. P. Maslov and M. V. Fedoriuk, Semi-Classical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981).
  22. A. J. Daley, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye,  and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170504 (2008).
  23. A. V. Gorshkov et al.Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110503 (2009).
  24. H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V. G. Pal’chikov,  and V. D. Ovsiannikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003).
  25. X. Xu et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 968 (2003).
  26. Y. Takasu et al.Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 040404 (2003).
  27. A possible level scheme in is: ; (); (); the STIRAP levels (). The laser-induced transfer between levels , and , involves a two-photon process (e.g. via the intermediate levels ).
  28. J. E. Sansonetti, and G. Nave, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 39(3), 033103 (2010).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
105113
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description