The turnstile mechanism across the Kuroshio current: analysis of dynamics in altimeter velocity fields

The turnstile mechanism across the Kuroshio current: analysis of dynamics in altimeter velocity fields

Carolina Mendoza, Ana M. Mancho111Correspondence to: a.m.mancho@icmat.es, Marie-Hélene Rio
Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas. CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM.
Serrano 121. 28006 Madrid, Spain.
CLS – Space Oceanography Division, Toulouse, France.
Abstract

In this article we explore the ability of dynamical systems tools to describe transport in oceanic flows characterized by data sets measured from satellite. In particular we have studied the geometrical skeleton describing transport in the Kuroshio region. For this purpose we have computed special hyperbolic trajectories, recognized as distinguished hyperbolic trajectories, that act as organizing centres of the flow. We have computed their stable and unstable manifolds, and they reveal that the turnstile mechanism is at work during several spring months in the year 2003 across the Kuroshio current. We have found that near the hyperbolic trajectories takes place a filamentous transport front-cross the current that mixes waters at both sides.

1 Introduction

Transport processes across the ocean have an important impact in global climate [Bower et al.(2009), Katija & Dabiri(2009)], as oceans are important reservoirs of heat and carbon dioxide which are the most important driving forces of climate change. Understanding and describing transport processes on the ocean have been a challenging task over the past years, since great currents over the ocean such as Gulf stream or Kuroshio that seem smooth, river-like streams in their Eulerian description, present a messy pattern on the float tracking [Bower et al.(2009), Lavender et al.(2000)]. Understanding such patterns is an essential ingredient for predicting the effects of global warming in Earth’s future climate.

Dynamical systems theory has provided in recent years a framework for describing transport in time dependent flows. It has been useful for finding transport routes in complex flows, which means it has successfully found order structures from erratic patterns. Typical tools in dynamical systems theory are Lyapunov exponents and invariant manifolds. These concepts are defined strictly on infinite time systems, however realistic flows, like those arising in geophysics or oceanography, are not infinite time systems and for their description, finite time versions of the definition of Lyapunov exponents, such as, finite size Lyapunov exponents FSLE [Aurell et al.(1997)] and finite time Lyapunov exponents FTLE [Nese(1989), Haller(2001)] are used. Invariant manifolds are objects that in the classical theory of dynamical systems are asymptotically defined for special trajectories such as fixed points or periodic orbits with hyperbolic stability. Recent articles by [Ide et al.(2002), Ju et al.(2003), Madrid & Mancho(2009)] have provided definitions that generalise these reference orbits for time dependent aperiodic flows. These special trajectories are called distinguished trajectories. The definition given in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] is proven to encompass fixed points and periodic orbits as particular cases. Separation points (SP) on boundaries such as, detachment and reattachment points are also particular examples of distinguished hyperbolic trajectories (DHT). The computation of SP has been also addressed in [Haller(2004)] however the definition provided in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] provides a systematic way for finding these special trajectories not only on boundaries but also in the interior of the flow. DHT and their stable and unstable manifolds are the essential dynamical tools we will apply in this article for describing transport in geophysical flows.

Lagrangian and Eulerian observational datasets have held great promise of providing deep insight on oceanic transport. Drifters observations have revealed fluid exchange [Bower & Rossby(1989), Lozier et al.(2003)] in the Gulf Stream. An important step forwards in the description of exchange of trajectories across the Gulf Stream was the meandering kinematic model proposed by [Bower(1991)]. Studies such as [Lozier et al.(2003)] have succeeded in describing transport in simplified models of the Gulf Stream by means of lobe dynamics [Bower(1991)]. Recently, ocean-observing satellites are entering a new operational era and naturally occupy an important place in programs designed to manage and predict ocean and climate change. These instruments may provide a near real time processing system of satellite altimeter data. In this article we describe cross-frontal transport along a major ocean current, the Kuroshio current, based on a Lagrangian description of observed altimeter velocities, over a period of the year 2003. Our description uses dynamical objects such as the stable and unstable manifolds of distinguished trajectories. We detect the turnstile mechanism across a part of the Kuroshio current. The turnstile survives persistently from April 3 to May 26, 2003. This mechanism had already been found to be present in realistic numerically produced data sets modeling the North Balearic front [Mancho et al.(2008)]. In this article we discuss similar ideas with the challenge of dealing with altimeter data. Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS), as the use of finite time Lyapunov exponents to compute transport issues in geophysical flows is referred to, or FSLE have also recently applied to describe dynamics in altimeter datasets [Beron-Vera et al.(2008), Rossi et al.(2008), Rypina et al.(2009)], although these studies are focused in areas of the ocean surface different from the Kuroshio current.

The structure of the article is as follows. In Section 2 we describe the analysed data and to what extent the velocity field satisfies the divergence free approach. Section 3 describes the details of the interpolation used in the data and provides the equations of the continuous dynamical system used on our analysis. Section 4 describes the computation of the distinguished hyperbolic trajectories and of their stable and unstable manifolds for the system built up in Section 3. Section 5 describes the turnstile mechanism governing the dynamics across a current that persist on the data amid latitudes N and N and longitudes E and E during the months of April to May 2003. Finally Section 6 details the conclusions.

2 The altimeter dataset

In this work we analyze transport across the Kuroshio current from April 3 to May 26, 2003, spanning a time interval of 54 days.

We use daily maps of surface currents computed at CLS in the framework of the SURCOUF project [Larnicol et al.(2006)] from a combination of altimetric sea surface heights and windstress data in a two-steps procedure: On one hand, multimission (ERS-ENVISAT, TOPEX-JASON) altimetric maps of sea level anomaly (SLA) are added to the RIO05 global Mean Dynamic Topography [Rio & Hernandez(2004), Rio et al.(2005)] to obtain global maps of sea surface heights from which surface geostrophic velocities (, ) are obtained by simple derivation.

(1)
(2)

where is the coriolis parameter and g the gravitational constant.

On the other hand, the Ekman component of the ocean surface current (, ) is estimated using a 2-parameter model: where and are estimated by latitudinal bands from a least square fit between ECMWF 6-hourly windstress analysis and an estimate of the Ekman current obtained removing the altimetric geostrophic current from the total current measured by drifting buoy velocities available from 1993 to 2005 (the method is described in further details in [Rio & Hernandez(2003)]).

Both the geostrophic and the Ekman component of the ocean surface current are added to obtain estimates of the ocean total surface current that are used in the Kuroshio area for the present study.

Figure 1: Velocity field of the Kuroshio current on April 4, 2003. A line marks a piece of current across which transport is studied. Maximum values of the velocity field are about 3.65 m/s.

Fig. 1 shows a sample of the velocity field on April 4, 2003. We have marked with a line the current across which we study transport. The presence in the nearby of two counterclockwise eddies suggest the presence of two hyperbolic points at both sides of the line that could maintain the turnstile mechanism. We will show in Section 5 that this is truly case. The interaction of these type of eddies with the main current has been pointed out to trigger the Kuroshio meander formation [Waseda et al.(2003)].

Our work considers that in the area under study the particle motion is restricted to the ocean surface, i.e, there is no significative vertical motions. The altimeter-derived velocity field is two-dimensional, however since the Ekman correction has been introduced, it is not guaranteed that the data is divergence free. We have computed the divergence of the velocity field in the whole period and area under study and we have verified that despite these corrections the divergence free approach is still valid.

3 The equations of motion

The equations of motion that describe the horizontal evolution of particle trajectories on a sphere is

(3)
(4)

where and represent the eastward and northward components of the altimetry surface velocity field respectively described in the previous section. Particle trajectories must be integrated in equations (3)-(4) and since information is provided just in a discrete space-time grid, a first issue to deal with is that of interpolation of discrete data sets. A recent paper by [Mancho et al.(2006)] compares different interpolation techniques in tracking particle trajectories. Bicubic spatial interpolation in space [Press et al.(1992)] and third order Lagrange polynomials in time are shown to provide a computationally efficient and accurate method. We use this technique in our computations. However we notice that bicubic spatial interpolation in space as discussed in [Press et al.(1992)] requires an equally spaced grid. Our data input is expressed in spherical coordinates, and the grid is not uniformly spaced in the latitude coordinate. In order to interpolate in an uniformly spaced grid, we transform our coordinate system () to a new one (). The latitude is related to the new coordinate by

(5)

Our velocity field is now on a uniform grid in the () coordinates. The equations of motion in the old variables are transformed to a new expression in the new variables,

(6)
(7)

where is obtained by inverting Eq. (5), i.e.

(8)

Once trajectories are integrated from these equations, for presentation purposes one can convert values back to latitudes just by using (8).

a)

Figure 2: Structure of the function for , a) in the neighbourhood of the western DHT, DHT, on March 13, 2003; b) in the neighbourhood of the eastern DHT, DHT, on June 19, 2003.

4 Distinguished Hyperbolic Trajectories and Manifolds

Distinguished hyperbolic trajectories and their unstable and stable manifolds are the dynamical systems objects used to describe and quantify transport.

Fig. 1 marks with a line the eulerian feature across which we study transport. The current, similarly to that studied in [Mancho et al.(2008), Coulliette and Wiggins(2001)], flows eastward. First we identify a DHT in the western part of the flow, for which we compute the unstable manifold and a DHT in the eastern part, for which we compute the stable manifold.

Computation of distinguished hyperbolic trajectories for aperiodic flows has been discussed in [Ide et al.(2002), Ju et al.(2003), Mancho et al.(2004), Madrid & Mancho(2009)]. The approach taken in this article is that of [Madrid & Mancho(2009)], which is based on the function defined as follows. Let denote a trajectory of the system (6)-(7). For all initial conditions in an open domain of the ocean surface, at a given time , consider the function

(9)

For an initial condition at , the function measures the length of the curve outlined by a trajectory from to on the plane .

We discuss in more detail the numerical evaluation of as defined in Eq. (9). Trajectories of the system (6)-(7) are obtained numerically, and thus represented by a finite number of points, . A discrete version of Eq. (9) is:

(10)

where the functions and represent a curve interpolation parametrized by , and the integral

(11)

is computed numerically. Following the methodology described in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] we have used the interpolation method used by [Dritschel(1989)] in the context of contour dynamics. To compute the integral (11) we have used the Romberges method (see [Press et al.(1992)]) of order with .

The function is defined over an open set, so it does not necessarily attain a minimum, but if it does, the minimum is denoted by . In [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] it is found that the position of the minimum of at each is a function of . For , the minimum converges to a fixed value called limit coordinate. Distinguished trajectories are those that for a time interval, pass close enough (at a distance , typically within numerical accuracy) to a path of limit coordinates. Computing limit coordinates becomes a method for finding distinguished trajectories because it is quite usual that there exist trajectories passing near these paths.

We have computed limit coordinates at opposite sides of the line depicted in Fig. 1. A typical structure of the function for appears in Fig. 2. The color code reads as follows: maximum values are dark red, while minima are dark blue. As discussed in [Mendoza & Mancho(2009)] the important information provided by are its minima and its singular features, so no specific colorbar is required. Fig. 2a) shows the contour plot near the western DHT, DHT, in March 13, 2003; Fig. 2b) depicts the contour plot of for the eastern DHT, DHT, in June 19, 2003. The time evolution of two paths of limit coordinates, DHT and DHT, at the West are displayed in Fig. 3. Initial conditions on each limit path evolve staying near it for a certain time interval. However to prove that a trajectory stays close to the path in long time intervals it is a difficult task because it is not possible to obtain the whole DHT by direct integration methods. As discussed in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)], DHTs are elusive and any initial condition in their neighborhood, eventually leaves it through the unstable manifold. If paths in Fig. 3 are trajectories they should satisfy Eqs. (6)-(7). However verifying this requires the computation of the time derivative of the paths of limit coordinates and these are very inaccurate. A better choice for confirming their trajectory character is to verify that they are at a distance of the intersection of the stable and unstable manifolds. The trajectory DHT remains distinguished from March 5 to May 11, 2003. Outside this time interval the path of limit coordinates although still exists for a short period, it is not longer a trajectory and eventually the path is lost. This kind of behavior coincides with that described in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] for a similar DHT in a highly aperiodic flow. At the western end there exists a second DHT labelled as DHT, which remains distinguished in an approximately complementary time interval, between May 10 and June 1, 2003. The distinguished property of DHT ends similarly to DHT. Panels in Fig. 4 show the path of limit coordinates at the East. The trajectory DHT remains distinguished between March 25 and June 24, 2003.

The fact that paths of limit coordinates are close to trajectories, at least for a certain interval of time, indicate that the minima of provide Lagrangian information. When the motion described in Eqs. (6)-(7) is expressed in a new reference frame, trajectories are related to the ones in the old frame by the same coordinate transformation. A question then is: do trajectories hold in the new frame the distinguished property?. The answer is yes. An example is reported for instance in [Madrid & Mancho(2009)], where limit coordinates for the rotating and non rotating Duffing equation are related by the appropriate coordinate transformation.

a)

Figure 3: Path of limit coordinates for DHT and DHT; a) longitude vs. time; b) latitude vs. time.

a)

Figure 4: Path of limit coordinates for DHT; a) longitude vs. time; b) latitude vs. time.

Once appropriate DHTs have been identified we compute its stable and unstable manifolds. A novel technique to compute stable and unstable manifolds of hyperbolic trajectories in aperiodic flows is developed by [Mancho et al.(2003)]. In [Mancho et al.(2004), Mancho et al.(2008)] this manifold computation is successfully applied to quite realistic flows. We will now apply these same algorithms to compute stable and unstable manifolds of DHT in altimeter data sets. In our study we compute the unstable manifold of DHT, and the stable manifold of DHT. The manifold computation requires as an input the position of the DHT at a given time and also the direction of the unstable or stable subspace at that time. In this work we obtain this in a different way to that proposed in [Mancho et al.(2004)]. We take advantage of the structure of the function depicted in Fig. 2, which shows strong sharp features. In [Mendoza & Mancho(2009)] these lines are reported to be an advected structure of Eqs. (6)-(7), thus confirming they are aligned with the stable and unstable subspaces. We use these directions as input for the unstable or stable subspaces in the manifold algorithm.

Fig. 5 shows the computed manifolds and DHTs on May 4, 2003. Almost every distinguishable line in this figure contains numerous foldings of each manifold, thus confirming how intricate they may be. In our computations the unstable manifold at a time is made of trajectories that at time , , were at a small segment aligned with the unstable subspace of the DHT. This is a finite time version of the asymptotic condition required for unstable manifolds in infinite time systems. Similarly the stable manifold at a time is made of trajectories that at time , are in a small segment aligned with the stable subspace of the DHT. Other approaches such as FTLE or FSLE compute manifolds at a given time as ridges of a scalar field, providing pieces of curves that are material curves. However links between pieces of curves are difficult to establish as they fade away. The intricate curves of Fig. 5 are linked curves (due to the asymptotic condition imposed in their computation) and this is an advantage over other methods. Manifolds in Fig. 5 however are too complex to concrete transport problems so that in next section we will extract from them pieces with the appropriate dynamical information.

Figure 5: Stable (blue) manifold of DHT at the eastern end of the current and unstable (red) manifold of DHT at the west.

5 The turnstile mechanism

The turnstile mechanism, extensively used and explained in the literature [Malhotra and Wiggins(1998), Rom-Kedar et al.(1990)], has been found to play a role in transport in several oceanographic contexts [Mancho et al.(2008), Coulliette and Wiggins(2001)]. Our manifold computations reveal the presence of the turnstile mechanism transporting masses of water across the current of Fig. 1 from north to south and viceversa. We study it for a period of 54 days from April 3 to May 26, 2003.

First, we determine a time dependent Lagrangian barrier made of pieces of manifolds that separates north from south. Manifolds are made of trajectories, thus as no particle trajectories can cross them, they are barriers to transport. Fig. 6 shows barriers at days April 4 and April 17, by depicting a piece of the unstable manifold of DHT and a piece of the stable manifold of DHT. How to choose these portions from intricate curves such as those depicted in Fig. 5? First, we consider that a manifold has two branches separated by the DHT, which constitutes a reference point. The selections are relatively short length curves either at one or both sides of the DHT. For instance for the unstable manifold case, these curves are traced up by all the trajectories that expanded from a small segment along the unstable subspace of the DHT during a relatively short interval of time. If segments along the unstable subspace are expanded for longer time intervals, then manifolds become so intricate as those in Fig. 5. In Fig. 6 the boundary intersection points are marked with letters and . Intersection points satisfy the property of invariance, which means that if the stable and unstable manifolds intersect at a time in a point, then they intersect for all time, and the intersection point is then a trajectory. In order to help us to understand the time evolution of lobes, we will depict the position of trajectories and at different times.

Figure 6: Boundaries at days April 3 2003 and April 17 2003 constructed from a (finite length) segment of the unstable manifold of DHT and a (finite length) segment of the stable manifold of DHT. The boundary intersection points are denoted respectively by and .

Fig. 7 shows longer pieces of the unstable and stable manifolds at the same days selected in Fig. 6. Manifolds intersect forming regions called lobes. It is only the fluid that is inside the lobes that can participate in turnstile mechanism. Fig. 7 displays two snapshots showing the evolution of lobes from April 2 to April 17. There it is noticed how the lobe which is at the north of the barrier at April 2 crosses to the south of the barrier at April 17. Similarly the lobe which is at the south in April 2, crosses to the north at April 17. Trajectories and are depicted showing that they evolve approaching to DHT. The area surrounded by a lobe has been coloured with green if near the western DHT, DHT, it was at the north side, and magenta if it was at the south. The turnstile mechanism transports magenta to the north and green to the south.

Figure 7: Turnstile lobes at days April 3, 2003 and April 17, 2003. The intersection trajectories and are displayed at both days showing their evolution from the DHT towards the DHT. The green area evolves from north to south while the magenta area does from the south to the north.

Along the time interval under study, several lobes are formed mixing waters of north and south. Fig. 8 contains a time sequence showing the evolution of several lobes created by the intersection of the stable and unstable manifolds. A sequence of trajectories on the intersection points is depicted. These trajectories evolve from west to east and serve as reference to track lobe evolution. The lobes between the intersection trajectories and of 8a) are not depicted in Fig. 8b) as they are very thin filaments stretched along the DHT. In the same way the lobes between the intersection trajectories and of Fig. 8b) are not depicted in Fig. 8a) as they are very thin filaments stretched along the DHT. We notice that in Fig. 8d) the western hyperbolic trajectory is labelled as DHT since it is a different distinguished trajectory to DHT that stopped as distinguished on May 11. Despite DHT has lost its distinguished property before we have completed our transport description, the manifold computation beyond this time still makes sense as it still is a material surface, and is still asymptotic to DHT. Although the manifold is not asymptotic to DHT, it is correct to say that DHT marks a Distinguished Trajectory on the manifold within certain accuracy . Any further description on the turnstile mechanism between May 11 and 26 needs to be referred to this new DHT. This kind of replacement of the DHT of reference along the invariant manifold has been discussed in [Mancho et al.(2006)]. The piece of stable manifold in 8d) does not show more lobes on May 26, and beyond this day the turnstile mechanism is disrupted due to topological transitions in the flow structure.

a)

c)

Figure 8: Sequence of lobes between April 17, 2003 and May 26, 2003 mixing waters from north to south and viceversa at the Kuroshio current.

The altimeter-derived estimates of the velocity field have expected errors, so one question is to establish whether the information obtained from the analysis of manifolds is robust to changes in the velocity field or not. The influence of deviations of the velocity fields on the Lagrangian structures has been examined in several works [Haller(2002), Hernandez-Carrasco et al.(2009), Poje et al.(2009)]. The main conclusion of these works is that Lagrangian structures are robust to errors, though conditions for the reliability of predictions are discussed. In what concerns to lobes and its role on transport it is possible to say that these are formed by intersections of stable and unstable manifolds and are typically observed in the neighborhood of a Distinguished Hyperbolic Trajectory. Despite the lack of rigorous mathematical theorems for aperiodic time dependent dynamical systems it is possible to foresee a relation between the vicinity of these DHTs and chaotic saddles. These latter persist under small perturbations of the vector field, i.e. they are structurally stable [Wiggins(2003)]. For this reason we also expect that the lobe description near the DHTs is robust under small deviations on the measured velocity field.

6 Conclusions

We have explored the power of dynamical systems ideas for analyzing altimeter data sets. In particular tools for quantifying Lagrangian transport have been successfully applied to oceanographic observations. Our study analyses cross-frontal transport in altimeter data sets along a flow located in the area of the Kuroshio current. As a novelty with respect to similar studies we have identified relevant DHTs following the methodology proposed in a recent paper by [Madrid & Mancho(2009)], instead of using that proposed in [Ide et al.(2002), Mancho et al.(2004), Mancho et al.(2006), Mancho et al.(2008)]. We have been able to detect relevant DHTs and we confirm that DHTs hold the distinguished property only for finite time intervals. Identification and computation of DHTs is by itself an important subject, since they organize the flow in the area and, because of this and of the sensitivity of the trajectories in their neighborhood, they are candidates for launch locations in efficiently designed drifter release experiments [Poje et al.(2002), Molcard et al.(2006)].

We have computed stable and unstable manifolds of the relevant DHTs. A time dependent Lagrangian ‘barrier’ is defined from pieces of the stable and unstable manifolds and transport across it is described by lobe motion. It is found that the turnstile mechanism is at work in this observational flow, leading to a filamentous transport near the hyperbolic trajectories. This mechanism survives between April 17, 2003 and May 26, 2003. After this date transitions in the flow take place, that are not well understood.

In summary this article explores the use, in a general oceanographic problem, of ideas and techniques associated with chaotic transport and dynamical systems, trying to shed some light on the mechanisms that lead to messy particle trajectories over the ocean. We expect that this tools and information will be of interest in the oceanographic community.

Acknowledgements

C.M. and A.M.M are very grateful to Antonio Turiel for his valuable help with the altimeter data. Also we are indebted with his many insightful comments and suggestions.

The computational part of this work was done using the CESGA computers SVGD and FINIS TERRAE.

The authors have been supported by CSIC Grant OCEANTECH No. PIF06-059, Consolider I-MATH C3-0104, MICINN Grants Nos. MTM2008-03754 and MTM2008-03840-E, and the Comunidad de Madrid Project No. SIMUMAT S-0505-ESP-0158.

References

  • [Aurell et al.(1997)] Aurell, E., Boffetta, G., Crisanti, A., Paladin, G., and Vulpiani, A.: Predictability in the large: an extension of the concept of Lyapunov exponent, J. Phys. A, 30, 1-26, doi:10.1088/0305-4470/30/1/003, 1997.
  • [Beron-Vera et al.(2008)] Beron-Vera F., Olascoaga M J, Goni G J.: Oceanic mesoscale eddies as revealed by Lagrangian coherent structures, Geophys. Research Letters 35, L12603, 2008.
  • [Bower & Rossby(1989)] Bower, A.S., Rossby T.: Evidence of cross-frontal exchange processes in the Gulf Stream based on isopycnal RAFOS float data, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 19 (9), 1177-1190, 1989.
  • [Bower(1991)] Bower, A.S.: A simple kinematic mechanism fro mixing fluid parcels across a meandering jet, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 21 (1), 173-180, 1991.
  • [Bower et al.(2009)] Bower, A. S., Lozier, M.S., Gary, S.F., and Böning, C.W.: Interior pathways of the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, Nature, 459, 243-247, doi:10.1038/nature07979, 2009.
  • [Coulliette and Wiggins(2001)] Coulliette, C., and Wiggins, S.: Intergyre transport in a wind-driven, quasigeostrophic double gyre: an application of lobe dynamics, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 8, 69–94, 2001.
  • [Dritschel(1989)] Dritschel, D.G., Contour dynamics and contour surgery: numerical algorithms for extended, high-resolution modelling of vortex dynamics in two-dimensional, inviscid, incompressible flows, Comput. Phys. Rep. 10, 77-146, 1989.
  • [Haller(2001)] Haller, G.: Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows, Physica D, 149, 248-277, doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00199-8, 2001.
  • [Haller(2002)] Haller G.: Lagrangian coherent structures from approximate velocity data, Physics of Fluids 14 1851-1861, doi:10.1063/1.1477449, 2002.
  • [Haller(2004)] Haller, G.: Exact theory of unsteady separation for two-dimensional flows, J. Fluid Mech., 512, 257-311, doi:10.1017/S0022112004009929, 2004.
  • [Hernandez-Carrasco et al.(2009)] Hernandez-Carrasco, I. , Hernandez-Garcia E, Lopez C, Turiel A.: Reliability of a Lagrangian analysis from FSLEs, http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/LAPCOD/2009-La_Londe-les-Maures/abstracts/lapcod2009_B203.php
  • [Ide et al.(2002)] Ide, K., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: Distinguished hyperbolic trajectories in time-dependent fluid flows: analytical and computational approach for velocity fields defined as data sets, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 9, 237-263, 2002.
  • [Ju et al.(2003)] Ju, N., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: Existence and computation of hyperbolic trajectories of aperiodically time dependent vector fields and their approximations, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng., 13, 1449-1457, doi:10.1142/S0218127403007321, 2003.
  • [Katija & Dabiri(2009)] Katija, K., and Dabiri, J.O.: A viscosity-enhanced mechanism for biogenic ocean mixing, Nature, 460, 624-626, doi:10.1038/nature08207, 2009.
  • [Larnicol et al.(2006)] Larnicol, G., Guinehut, S., Rio, M.-H., Drevillon, M., Faugere, Y., and Nicolas, G.: The global observed ocean products of the French Mercator project. Proceedings of the 15 years of progress in Radar altimetry, ESA symposium, Venice, March 2006.
  • [Lavender et al.(2000)] Lavender, K.L., Davis, R.E., and Owens, W.B.: Oceanography: drifters reveal deep circulation, Nature, 407, 66-69, doi:10.1038/415954a, 2000.
  • [Lozier et al.(2003)] Lozier, M.S, Pratt L.J., Rogerson, AM and Miller P. D.: Exchange geometry revealed by float trajectories in the Gulf Stream, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27(11), 2327-2341, 1997.
  • [Madrid & Mancho(2009)] Madrid, J.A.J., and Mancho, A.M.: Distinguished trajectories in time dependent vector fields, Chaos, 19, 013111-1-013111-18, doi:10.1063/1.3056050, 2009.
  • [Malhotra and Wiggins(1998)] Malhotra, N., and Wiggins, S.: Geometric structures, lobe dynamics, and Lagrangian transport in flows with aperiodic time-dependence, with applications to Rossby wave flow, J. Nonlinear Science, 8, 401–456, doi:10.1007/s003329900057, 1998.
  • [Mancho et al.(2003)] Mancho, A.M., Small, D., Wiggins, S. and, Ide, K.: Computation of stable and unstable manifolds of hyperbolic trajectories in two-dimensional, aperiodically time-dependent vector fields, Physica D, 182, 188–222, doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(03)00152-0, 2003.
  • [Mancho et al.(2004)] Mancho, A.M., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: Computation of hyperbolic and their stable and unstable manifolds for oceanographic flows represented as data sets, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 17–33, 2004.
  • [Mancho et al.(2006)] Mancho, A.M., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: A tutorial on dynamical systems concepts applied to Lagrangian transport in oceanic flows defined as finite time data sets: theoretical and computational issues, Phys. Rep., 437, 3-4, 55-124, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.005, 2006.
  • [Mancho et al.(2006)] Mancho, A.M., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: A comparison of methods for interpolating chaotic flows from discrete velocity data, Comp. & Fluids, 35, 416-428, doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.003, 2006.
  • [Mancho et al.(2008)] Mancho, A.M., Hernández-García, E., Small, D., and Wiggins, S.: Lagrangian transport through an ocean front in the Northwestern Mediterranean sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 1222, doi:10.1175/2007JPO3677.1, 2008.
  • [Mendoza & Mancho(2009)] Mendoza, C., Mancho, A.M., The hidden geometry of ocean flows. Preprint.
  • [MERSEA(2008)] MERSEA project, http://www.mersea.eu.org/
  • [Molcard et al.(2006)] Molcard, A., Poje, A. and Özgökmen., T.: Directed drifter launch strategies for Lagrangian data assimilation using hyperbolic trajectories, Ocean Modell., 12, 268–289, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.06.004, 2006.
  • [Nese(1989)] Nese, J.M.: Quantifying local predictability in phase space, Physica D, 35, 237-250, doi:10.1016/0167-2789(89)90105-X, 1989.
  • [Poje et al.(2002)] Poje, A.C., Toner, M., Kirwan, A.D., and Jones, C.K.R.T.: Drifter launch strategies based on Lagrangian templates, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32(6), 1855–1869, doi:10.1175/1520-0485, 2002.
  • [Poje et al.(2009)] Poje A, Haza A, Ozgokmen T, Resolution and Scale Dependence of Relative Dispersion in a Hierarchy of Ocean Models http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/LAPCOD/2009-La_Londe-les-Maures/abstracts/lapcod2009_B101.php
  • [Press et al.(1992)] Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P.: Numerical recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1992.
  • [Rio & Hernandez(2004)] Rio, M.-H., Hernandez, F: A mean dynamic topography computed over the world ocean from altimetry, in situ measurements, and a geoid model, J. of Geophysical Researc-Oceans, 109, C2, C12032, 2004.
  • [Rio & Hernandez(2003)] Rio, M.-H., and F. Hernandez: High-frequency response of wind-driven currents measured by drifting buoys and altimetry over the world ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C8), 3283, doi:10.1029/2002JC001655, 2003.
  • [Rio et al.(2005)] Rio, M.-H., Schaeffer, P., Hernandez, F., Lemoine, J.: The estimation of the ocean Mean Dynamic Topography through the combination of altimetric data, in-situ measurements and GRACE geoid: From global to regional studies. Proceedings of the GOCINA International Workshop, Luxembourg, 2005.
  • [Rom-Kedar et al.(1990)] Rom-Kedar, V., Leonard, A., and Wiggins, S.: An analytical study of transport, mixing, and chaos in an unsteady vortical flow, J. Fluid Mech., 214, 347–394, doi:10.1017/S0022112090000167, 1990.
  • [Rossi et al.(2008)] Rossi, V., López, C., Sudre, J., Hernández-García, E., Garçon, V.: Comparative study of mixing and biological activity of the Benguela and Canary upwelling systems, Geophysical Research Letters 35, L11602, 1-5, 2008.
  • [Rypina et al.(2009)] Rypina I.I., Brown MG, Kocak H.: Transport in an idealized three-gyre system with application to the Adriatic Sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39, 675-690, 2009.
  • [Waseda et al.(2003)] Waseda, T., Mitsudera, H., Taguchi, B., and Yoshikawa, Y.: On the eddy-Kuroshio interaction: meander formation process, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C7), 3220, doi:10.1029/2002JC001583, 2003.
  • [Wiggins(2003)] Wiggins, S.: Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer Verlag, 2003
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
102011
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description