Stellar variability and extended main sequences

The overlooked role of stellar variability in the extended main sequence of LMC intermediate-age clusters

R. Salinas11affiliation: Gemini Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile , M. A. Pajkos22affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA , J. Strader33affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA , A. K. Vivas44affiliation: Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile and R. Contreras Ramos55affiliation: Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Santiago, Chile 66affiliation: Instituto de Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 782-0436 Macul, Chile rsalinas@gemini.edu
Abstract

Intermediate-age star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud show extended main sequence turn offs (MSTOs), which are not consistent with a canonical single stellar population. These broad turn offs have been interpreted as evidence for extended star formation and/or stellar rotation. Since most of these studies use single frames per filter to do the photometry, the presence of variable stars near the MSTO in these clusters has remained unnoticed and their impact totally ignored. We model the influence of Delta Scuti using synthetic CMDs, adding variable stars following different levels of incidence and amplitude distributions. We show that Delta Scuti observed at a single phase will produce a broadening of the MSTO without affecting other areas of a CMD like the upper MS or the red clump; furthermore, the amount of spread introduced correlates with cluster age as observed. This broadening is constrained to ages 1–3 Gyr when the MSTO area crosses the instability strip, which is also consistent with observations. Variable stars cannot explain bifurcarted MSTOs or the extended MSTOs seen in some young clusters, but they can make an important contribution to the extended MSTOs in intermediate-age clusters.

Magellanic Clouds — globular clusters: general — stars: variables: delta Scuti

1 Introduction

footnotetext: CTIO/Gemini REU student.

The existence of multiple stellar populations in Galactic globular clusters (GCs) is considered a widespread phenomenon (Gratton et al., 2012, and references therein), with only a few possible exceptions (see Salinas & Strader, 2015, and references therein). The presence of a second (and subsequent) populations is most likely associated to the ability of clusters to retain enriched material expelled to the ISM either from supernovae, AGB stars, fast-rotating stars or other types of interacting binaries (e.g. Ventura et al., 2001; Bastian et al., 2013). Even though chemically distinct, the age difference that should exist between populations, between tens to a few hundred Myr depending on the origin of the enriched material, is extremely difficult to measure given the ancient ( 12 Gyr) nature of all Galactic GCs.

On the contrary, star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) exhibit a wide range of ages from a few Myr up to clusters as old as the Milky Way GCs, with a distribution of masses overlapping the one in our Galaxy (e.g. Baumgardt et al., 2013). The study of younger clusters may give us a glimpse of the conditions of early stellar evolution in the now old GCs. Specifically, in the case of young (tens to hundreds of Myrs) and intermediate-age (1–2 Gyr) clusters, in principle both the chemistry and age difference between populations can be measured giving access to a more complete knowledge of their star formation history.

The first clear evidence of multiple stellar populations in LMC clusters came from precise Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry of intermediate-age GCs revealing extended main sequences (Mackey & Broby Nielsen, 2007; Mackey et al., 2008; Milone et al., 2009), which was interpreted as extended star formation histories lasting a few hundreds of Myrs. Milone et al. (2009) argued that up to 75% of their sample of 55 LMC clusters were not consistent with the single stellar population (SSP) hypothesis. The widespread nature of extended main sequences ruled out the possibility of them being the outcome of the mergers of two clusters with slightly different ages (e.g. Goudfrooij et al., 2009; Milone et al., 2009).

The straightforward interpretation of extended main sequences as signature of extended formation histories was quickly contended. An age spread visible at the MSTO level should also be visible at the red clump, but these do not show the expected spread in color and luminosity, being rather consistent with SSPs (Li et al., 2014; Bastian & Niederhofer, 2015, but see Goudfrooij et al. 2015 for a different view), also, in young massive clusters in the LMC, where the effect on the color-magnitude diagrams should be even clearer, the evidence for multiple populations remains controversial (Bastian & Silva-Villa, 2013; Niederhofer et al., 2015; Correnti et al., 2015).

Given the difficulties that the multiple stellar populations hypothesis face, stellar rotation has emerged as a more appealing explanation. Fast rotating stars with ages 1.5 Gyr, when viewed from different angles would produce the same extension of the MSTO, mimicking the effect of multiple stellar populations (Bastian & de Mink, 2009; Yang et al., 2013; Brandt & Huang, 2015), although it has been claimed that rotation alone cannot fully reproduce the extended MSTO morphology (Girardi et al., 2011).

Here we study the contribution of yet another ingredient into the nature of extended MSs: the fact that the instability strip crosses the upper MS, MSTO and sub giant branch of intermediate-age clusters. Variable stars near the MSTO could produce an spurious luminosity and color spread if their pulsation properties, in particular amplitudes, are not properly taken into account. This is specially true when deriving CMDs from single or very few images per filter as is the usual case for HST photometry (e.g. Mackey & Broby Nielsen, 2007; Milone et al., 2009). One attractive feature of this idea is that it would explain the absence of extended MSTOs in clusters older than 2.5 Gyr, given that the TO for these ages is redder than the instability strip, so no pulsations at the MSTO level would be produced. It will also explain that the color spreads are limited to the MSTO level and not affecting the red clump.

1.1 Delta Scuti stars

Figure 1: The instability strip at the MSTO level. Dashed red lines indicate the empirical limits of the instability strip for Galactic  Sct from Rodríguez & Breger (2001). Solid lines indicate new limits broadly covering the colors of  Sct in the LMC from Poleski et al. (2010) (small black circles) and Carina (Vivas & Mateo, 2013, green symbols). Blue lines indicate BaSTI isochrones for 1 and 3 Gyrs with [Fe/H]=–0.5.

Delta Scuti (hereafter  Sct ) are variable stars presenting both radial and non-radial pulsations produced by the well-known mechanism (Baker & Kippenhahn, 1962; Cox, 1980), with periods between 30 minutes up to 8 hours. They are main sequence stars with spectral types from late A to early F and masses between 1.5 and 2.5 M (see e.g. Breger, 2000, for a review).

Fig. 1 shows two isochrones from BaSTI models (Pietrinferni et al., 2004) of 1 and 3 Gyrs with [Fe/H]=–0.5, representative of the intermediate-age cluster population in the LMC (e.g. Grocholski et al., 2006). Overlaid, in dashed red lines, are the limits of the empirical Galactic lower instability strip at the MSTO level from Rodríguez & Breger (2001). Since the Rodríguez & Breger (2001) sample is mostly confined to solar neighborhood variables, their metallicity is close to solar. To more properly address the instability strip at lower metallicities we use photometry of  Sct in the body of the LMC from Poleski et al. (2010) (black symbols) and the Carina dSph (Vivas & Mateo, 2013, green symbols). We define new empirical limits of the instability strip (solid red lines) encompassing the bulk of the  Sct in these two galaxies, with the caveat that these samples are likely contaminated with  Sct of lower metallicities and probably metal-poor SX Phe variables, making its red limit uncertain.

Stars in the upper MS, MSTO and subgiant branch for stellar populations with 1 – 3 Gyr will therefore experience pulsations. But unlike RR Lyrae stars, which lie at the intersection of the horizontal branch and the instability strip, not all MS stars inside the instability strip develop pulsations. The percentage of pulsating stars compared to the total number of stars inside the instability strip is known as the incidence. The incidence of Sct in the MW, from the study of the Solar neighborhood and open clusters is somewhere between a quarter and half of the stars within the instability strip (Breger, 2000; Poretti et al., 2003; Balona & Dziembowski, 2011), although the majority of these have very small amplitudes of a few milimagnitudes.

Figure 2: Our models based on BaSTI synthetic CMDs. In all four panels a 1.5 Gyr old population with [Fe/H]=–0.5 was used. Blue dashed lines indicate the limits of the instability strip defined in Sect. 1.1. Each panel indicates the  Sct incidence used, their maximum amplitude and the number of  Sct per cluster, while the leftmost panel shows the original synthetic CMD without variables. The red box indicates the section used to calculate the color spread introduced by the variables.

Highly uncertain are the incidence values for  Sct in extragalactic systems because it is expected that a large part of them will not be detected given their low amplitudes, implying a lower incidence. In Carina, Vivas & Mateo (2013) report a lower limit of incidence of 8%. However, the number of high amplitude  Sct in extragalactic systems like Carina and Fornax seems to be intrinsically higher than those observed in the field of the MW (Poretti et al., 2008; Vivas & Mateo, 2013). In Carina, the peak of the amplitude distribution is =0.5 mags (Vivas & Mateo, 2013) while in the LMC is 0.3 mags (Poleski et al., 2010).

In this paper we explore the influence of  Sct on the morphology of the MSTO by using synthetic CMDs modified by the presence of these variable stars.

2 The influence of Delta Scuti in a CMD

2.1 Incidence and amplitudes

Since the great majority of extended MSTO have been detected using HST imaging (e.g. Milone et al., 2009), our models try to reproduce those CMDs. From DAOphot catalogs of HST/ACS photometry of NGC 1846 (GO: 10595, PI: Goudfrooij) obtained from the Hubble Legacy Archivehla.stsci.edu, photometric errors at the MSTO level are of the order of 0.008 mag. Conservatively we assume an error of 0.01 mag per filter for the entire CMD. Our models use as starting point BaSTI synthetic CMDs (Pietrinferni et al., 2004) with [Fe/H]=–0.5, scaled to solar mixture and convective overshooting. Stars follow a luminosity function implied by the Salpeter (1955) IMF, using a total number stars resulting in a population of , typical for a fairly massive intermediate-age LMC cluster. Different ages between 0.75 and 2.5 Gyr were used (see below).

The instability strip defined in Sect. 1.1 was used to set the color boundaries from which stars would be selected to be modeled as variables. Stars within the instability strip were chosen randomly for values of the incidence between 10% to 50%. The selected stars were then modeled as variables using the cosine expansion of Simon & Lee (1981),

(1)

where is the “static” magnitude coming from the CMD modeling described above.

Amplitudes and phases are usually grouped in the form and , and we took these values from the study of  Sct in the first OGLE bulge campaign of Morgan et al. (1998). The Morgan et al. (1998) were preferred over the Poleski et al. (2010) values from OGLE-III since the former studied the Fourier parameters up to the 4th term, while the latter gives values for and only. In practice, for each star, values for the Fourier parameters were drawn from uniform distributions, , , and, , , , , following the results of Morgan et al. (1998) and where we use the notation to describe a uniform distribution with limits and . The most relevant quantity is which dominates the total amplitude of the light variation. Its impact was studied drawing its distribution from several uniform distributions with maximum values for between 0.1 and 0.2. This is a conservative approach considering the largest amplitudes for  Sct in the LMC reach 0.8 mags in (Poleski et al., 2010).

Figure 3: Distribution of pseudo-colors(ages) as function of incidence. In all cases a maximum amplitude was used. The sold black lines shows the spread when no variables are included.

Since Fourier parameters exist only for the observations in , light curves in were generated as scaled up versions of the light curves applying to the empirical factor given by Rodríguez et al. (2007). The period distribution for these simulated variables was taken as a normal distribution centered in 0.075 days and with dispersion of 0.02 days following the results of Poleski et al. (2010) Finally, the modeled light curves were “observed” at one fixed time for each filter, that is, taking for each variable a measurement from their light curve at a random phase and putting back these magnitudes into the CMDs.

The results from the modeling can be seen in Fig. 2, where three combinations of incidence and maximum amplitude are shown. The most salient result is that even though stars can develop pulsations everywhere within the instability strip, the color and magnitude shift of stars in the upper MS is mostly parallel to the MS incurring in little broadening of the MS width. On the contrary,  Sct near the TO experience color and luminosity changes almost perpendicular to the TO artificially broadening the MSTO when observed at a random phase.

In order to quantify the broadening of the MSTO area introduced by the  Sct , following Goudfrooij et al. (2011) we construct a parallelogram where one pair of the sides is roughly parallel to the isochrones, while the other pair is approximately perpendicular (see red boxes in Fig. 2). The parallelogram is located where the difference in the isochrones is the largest, therefore the minimum distance to the axis that is parallel to the isochrones can be considered as a “pseudo-age”, which in this case is introduced by the variable stars and does not represent a real age spread. The distribution of these pseudo-color/ages as function of incidence with a fixed maximum amplitude , can be seen in Fig. 3, where generalized histograms have been produced using an Epanechnikov kernel (Silverman, 1986). The models shows that the density of stars near its parent isochrone decreases with increasing incidence, and the distributions developed extended wings departing from the Gaussian errors. The FWHM of the distribution can increase up to a 50% when an incidence of 50% is used.

Figure 4: Distribution of MSTO spread as function of cluster age. All models have an incidence of 30%. The increase and decrease of the FWHM with a peak at 2 Gyr broadly reproduces the observations of Niederhofer et al. (2016). For each age the label indicates the color at the MSTO.

2.2 MSTO spread as function of age

As seen in Fig. 1,  Sct will only affect the MSTO between ages 1 and 3 Gyr. For ages below 1 Gyr the TO point is too bright and  Sct will be only produced in the MS. For ages older than 3 Gyr the redder edge of instability strip is bluer than the MSTO so no pulsations will be developed in the MS (only in some possible blue stragglers).

We quantify the influence of  Sct as function of age running our model with fixed incidence of 30% and maximum amplitude , for ages from 0.75 to 2.75 Gyr with a step of 0.25 Gyr. The pseudo-age spread introduced at the MSTO is measured with the parallelogram approach introduced in the previous Section, centering it in each corresponding isochrone.

Niederhofer et al. (2016) used data from Goudfrooij et al. (2014) to argue that age spreads in the LMC clusters increase as function of cluster age, reaching a maximum at 1.5–1.7 Gyr, and then decreasing after that age.

Figure 4 shows the change in the FWHM of the pseudo age distributions as function of model age. These are the mean values and standard deviations from 50 models per age. In general it shows a behavior similar to the one found by Niederhofer et al. (2016), although with a smaller amplitude. This behavior is easily explained as the MSTO region moves in and out of the instability strip making the highest number of stars to develop pulsations close to 2 Gyr. We stress, however, that absolute ages are model dependent, and different sets of isochrones will show differences of a couple hundred Myrs to define the edges of the instability strip.

3 Summary and conclusions

In this paper we explored the influence the  Sct pulsators have in the morphology of the MSTO in intermediate-age clusters in the LMC. Since the great majority of the photometry of these clusters comes from using merely 1 or 2 images per filter (e.g. Mackey & Broby Nielsen, 2007; Milone et al., 2009; Piatti et al., 2014), these variables have so far being undetected, and their role ignored.

We modeled an intermediate-age cluster using BaSTI isochrones, introducing  Sct populations of different amplitude distributions and incidence using  Sct shapes from Morgan et al. (1998). Our model shows,

  • a color spread is introduced by  Sct only at the MSTO level and very little at the upper MS,

  • this spread can be up to 50% of the original value when a large number of variables are present,

  • the color spread is a function of cluster age resembling the pattern discovered by Niederhofer et al. (2016) ,

  • no color spread will be introduced at the red clump,

  • no spread will be seen for cluster older than 3 Gyr.

There are several issues that variable stars cannot explain, most notably the existence of bifurcated MSTOs in clusters like NGC 1846 (Mackey & Broby Nielsen, 2007) and the presence of extended MSTOs in young clusters like NGC 1856 (Milone et al., 2015; Correnti et al., 2015), where no influence of  Sct at the MSTO level is expected. Nevertheless, we have shown that  Sct will affect the MSTO morphology for clusters in the 1–3 Gyr age range, introducing a spread that can be misinterpreted as a departures from a simple stellar population, and therefore they cannot be ignored.

It is possible that the extended MSTO phenomenon in intermediate-age clusters is actually the result of a combination of an extended star formation, stellar rotation and stellar variability, but while the first two have been very difficult to disentangle (e.g. Niederhofer et al., 2016), the impact of the latter, controlled by the incidence and the amplitude distribution of  Sct , will be the easiest to properly assess once high spatial resolution time series images of these clusters become available.

We thank the referee for a helpful report which prompted a more realistic modeling. RS thanks Nate Bastian, Roger Cohen, Antonino Milone and Aldo Valcarce for useful conversations. This project was conducted in the framework of the CTIO REU Program, which is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant AST-1062976. JS acknowledges partial support from NSF grant AST-1514763 and the Packard Foundation. Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and obtained from the Hubble Legacy Archive, which is a collaboration between the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI/NASA), the Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST-ECF/ESA) and the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CADC/NRC/CSA). This work has made use of BaSTI web tools.

References

  • Baker & Kippenhahn (1962) Baker, N., & Kippenhahn, R. 1962, ZAp, 54, 114
  • Balona & Dziembowski (2011) Balona, L. A., & Dziembowski, W. A. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 591
  • Bastian & de Mink (2009) Bastian, N., & de Mink, S. E. 2009, MNRAS, 398, L11
  • Bastian et al. (2013) Bastian, N., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., de Mink, S. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2398
  • Bastian & Niederhofer (2015) Bastian, N., & Niederhofer, F. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1863
  • Bastian & Silva-Villa (2013) Bastian, N., & Silva-Villa, E. 2013, MNRAS, 431, L122
  • Baumgardt et al. (2013) Baumgardt, H., Parmentier, G., Anders, P., & Grebel, E. K. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 676
  • Brandt & Huang (2015) Brandt, T. D., & Huang, C. X. 2015, ApJ, 807, 25
  • Breger (2000) Breger, M. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. Montgomery, 3
  • Correnti et al. (2015) Correnti, M., Goudfrooij, P., Puzia, T. H., & de Mink, S. E. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3054
  • Cox (1980) Cox, J. P. 1980, Theory of stellar pulsation
  • Girardi et al. (2011) Girardi, L., Eggenberger, P., & Miglio, A. 2011, MNRAS, 412, L103
  • Goudfrooij et al. (2015) Goudfrooij, P., Girardi, L., Rosenfield, P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1693
  • Goudfrooij et al. (2009) Goudfrooij, P., Puzia, T. H., Kozhurina-Platais, V., & Chandar, R. 2009, AJ, 137, 4988
  • Goudfrooij et al. (2011) —. 2011, ApJ, 737, 3
  • Goudfrooij et al. (2014) Goudfrooij, P., Girardi, L., Kozhurina-Platais, V., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 35
  • Gratton et al. (2012) Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., & Bragaglia, A. 2012, A&A Rev., 20, 50
  • Grocholski et al. (2006) Grocholski, A. J., Cole, A. A., Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., & Smith, V. V. 2006, AJ, 132, 1630
  • Li et al. (2014) Li, C., de Grijs, R., & Deng, L. 2014, ApJ, 784, 157
  • Mackey & Broby Nielsen (2007) Mackey, A. D., & Broby Nielsen, P. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 151
  • Mackey et al. (2008) Mackey, A. D., Broby Nielsen, P., Ferguson, A. M. N., & Richardson, J. C. 2008, ApJ, 681, L17
  • Milone et al. (2009) Milone, A. P., Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., & Anderson, J. 2009, A&A, 497, 755
  • Milone et al. (2015) Milone, A. P., Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3750
  • Morgan et al. (1998) Morgan, S. M., Simet, M., & Bargenquast, S. 1998, Acta Astron., 48, 509
  • Niederhofer et al. (2016) Niederhofer, F., Bastian, N., Kozhurina-Platais, V., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A148
  • Niederhofer et al. (2015) Niederhofer, F., Hilker, M., Bastian, N., & Silva-Villa, E. 2015, A&A, 575, A62
  • Piatti et al. (2014) Piatti, A. E., Keller, S. C., Mackey, A. D., & Da Costa, G. S. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1425
  • Pietrinferni et al. (2004) Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F. 2004, ApJ, 612, 168
  • Poleski et al. (2010) Poleski, R., Soszyński, I., Udalski, A., et al. 2010, Acta Astron., 60, 1
  • Poretti et al. (2003) Poretti, E., Garrido, R., Amado, P. J., et al. 2003, A&A, 406, 203
  • Poretti et al. (2008) Poretti, E., Clementini, G., Held, E. V., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, 947
  • Rodríguez & Breger (2001) Rodríguez, E., & Breger, M. 2001, A&A, 366, 178
  • Rodríguez et al. (2007) Rodríguez, E., Fauvaud, S., Farrell, J. A., et al. 2007, A&A, 471, 255
  • Salinas & Strader (2015) Salinas, R., & Strader, J. 2015, ApJ, 809, 169
  • Salpeter (1955) Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
  • Silverman (1986) Silverman, B. W. 1986, Density estimation for statistics and data analysis
  • Simon & Lee (1981) Simon, N. R., & Lee, A. S. 1981, ApJ, 248, 291
  • Ventura et al. (2001) Ventura, P., D’Antona, F., Mazzitelli, I., & Gratton, R. 2001, ApJ, 550, L65
  • Vivas & Mateo (2013) Vivas, A. K., & Mateo, M. 2013, AJ, 146, 141
  • Yang et al. (2013) Yang, W., Bi, S., Meng, X., & Liu, Z. 2013, ApJ, 776, 112
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
221135
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description