A Coefficients of the optimal waveform

The optimal swimming sheet

Abstract

Propulsion at microscopic scales is often achieved through propagating traveling waves along hair-like organelles called flagella. Taylor’s two-dimensional swimming sheet model is frequently used to provide insight into problems of flagellar propulsion. We derive numerically the large-amplitude waveform of the two-dimensional swimming sheet that yields optimum hydrodynamic efficiency; the ratio of the squared swimming speed to the rate-of-working of the sheet against the fluid. Using the boundary element method, we show the optimal waveform is a front-back symmetric regularized cusp that is more efficient than the optimal sine-wave. This optimal two-dimensional shape is smooth, qualitatively different from the kinked form of Lighthill’s optimal three-dimensional flagellum, not predicted by small-amplitude theory, and different from the smooth circular-arc-like shape of active elastic filaments.

Swimming sheet, Stokes flow, micro-scale propulsion, optimal waveform

I Introduction

The microscopic world is teeming with organisms and cells that must self-propel through their fluid environment in order to survive or carry out their functions Bray (2000). At these very small scales, viscous forces dominate inertia in fluid flows, and a common method of overcoming the challenges of viscous propulsion through the fluid environment is by propagating waves along slender, hair-like organelles called flagella or cilia Lighthill (1975); Childress (1981). To examine the fluid mechanical basis for microscopic propulsion, Taylor (1951) considered a simplified flagellum model comprising a two-dimensional sheet exhibiting small amplitude traveling waves. This seminal work subsequently sparked the development of other techniques for examining Newtonian viscous flows such as slender-body theory Hancock (1953); Keller and Rubinow (1976); Johnson (1980) and resistive-force theory Gray and Hancock (1955); Lighthill (1975), as well as other models for non-Newtonian swimming based on distribution of force singularities Montenegro-Johnson et al. (2012); Chrispell et al. (2013) .

Due to its analytical tractability and agreement with more involved approaches in the small-amplitude limit, Taylor’s swimming sheet has been used to give insight into many fundamental problems in microscale propulsion, such as hydrodynamic synchronization between waving flagella Taylor (1951); Elfring and Lauga (2009); Elfring et al. (2010); Elfring and Lauga (2011), swimming in non-Newtonian fluids Lauga (2007); Teran et al. (2010); Montenegro-Johnson et al. (2013) and swimming past deformable membranes Chrispell et al. (2013). These approaches are typically characterized by asymptotic expansion of the flagellar waveform under the condition that the amplitude of the waves is small when compared to the wavelength. Recently, Taylor’s small-amplitude expansion was formally extended to arbitrarily high order for a pure sine-wave, a method able to produce results comparable to full numerical simulations of large amplitude sine-waves with the boundary element method Sauzade et al. (2011).

Motivated by the role of evolutionary pressures on the shape and kinematics of swimming microorganisms, it is relevant to investigate which flagellar waveform is the most energetically efficient for the cell. For an infinite flagellum, Lighthill (1975) showed that in the local drag approximation of resistive-force theory, the hydrodynamically-optimal flagellar waveform has a constant tangent angle to the swimming direction. This leads to the shape of a smooth helix in three dimensions, and a singular triangle wave in two dimensions. Whilst the helical waveform is commonly observed in bacterial flagella Brennen and Winet (1977); Spagnolie and Lauga (2011), unsurprisingly the kinked planar waveform is not. Spagnolie and Lauga (2010) showed that this shape singularity in Lighthill’s flagellum can be regularized by penalizing the swimming efficiency by the elastic energy required to bend a flagellum, which might provide one explanation for its absence in nature. This model was then improved upon by Lauga and Eloy (2013) by proposing an energetic measure based on the internal molecular cost necessary to deform the active flagellum. For finite-length flagella, Pironneau and Katz (1974) showed that traveling waves are fundamental to optimal propulsion. Using resistive force theory, they then analyzed optimal patterns for model spermatozoon exhibiting small amplitude planar sinusoidal waves and finite amplitude triangle waves. The optimal stroke pattern of Purcell’s finite three-link swimmer was found by Tam and Hosoi (2007), who then went on to consider optimal gaits for the green alga Chlamydomonas Tam and Hosoi (2011).

While all past optimization work has focused on three-dimensional slender filaments, the optimal waveform of Taylor’s two-dimensional swimming sheet has yet to be considered. Although the two-dimensionality of the problem makes it less realistic as a model for swimming cells, the fluid dynamics around a sheet can be computed very accurately, allowing us to bypass various hydrodynamic modeling approximations employed in three dimensions. In the present study, we use the boundary element method to examine a sheet propagating large amplitude waves of arbitrary shape. We derive computationally the waveform leading to swimming with maximum hydrodynamic efficiency. We show that the optimal waveform for the swimming sheet is a regularized cusp wave not predicted by small-amplitude analysis. The optimal is qualitatively different from three-dimensional swimmers, both the kinked triangle of Lighthill’s hydrodynamically-optimal flagellum Lighthill (1975) and the circular arcs of internally-optimal active filaments Lauga and Eloy (2013) and indicates a qualitative difference between two- and three-dimensional swimming at large amplitude.

Ii Formulation of the problem

Newtonian fluid mechanics at microscopic scales is governed by the incompressible Stokes flow equations,

(1)

where is the fluid velocity field, the dynamic pressure and is the dynamic viscosity, hereafter non-dimensionalized to .

Figure 1: A schematic of the wave propagation of a swimming sheet, here illustrated by a single sine-wave mode, showing the computational domain ( to along the axis), direction of wave propagation (in the swimming frame) and direction of swimming.

We consider the waving sheet model illustrated in Fig. 1, and assume the waveform to be fixed and to travel along the positive direction at unit speed. The infinite sheet is periodic over the interval , and swimming is expected to occur in the direction, opposite to the direction of propagation of the wave Taylor (1951). Since the sheet is infinite, there is no extrinsic length-scale to the problem, and as such we hereafter non-dimensionalise lengths using the reciprocal of the wavenumber, . In order for net swimming to take place with no rotation, we require the wave to be odd about the axis , i.e. ask that . Without loss of generality, the waveform may therefore be described as a Fourier-sine series where the shape in the swimming frame is described by with

(2)

Even modes for the shape, with any integer, are always obtained by our optimization algorithm to be zero, indicating that optimal waveforms are front-back symmetric waves. The physical reason underlying this front-back symmetry is unclear. Due to kinematic reversibility, if the shape was asymmetric then an equally optimal waveform would be its front-back mirror image, and thus the optimization procedure would always lead to two symmetric solutions. This is not the case and a unique, front-back symmetric shape is always obtained. We thus consider a general waveform represented by

(3)

and use our computational approach to derive the optimal series of coefficients for increasing N. The lack of an extrinsic length-scale to the infinite sheet means that our choice of first mode is in some sense arbitrary, and thus we will not consider solutions for which , in order to define a fundamental period to the wave.

To derive the hydrodynamically-optimal waveform we use the standard definition of swimming efficiency introduced by Lighthill (1975). We therefore compare a useful rate of swimming, , to the rate of working of the sheet against the fluid, , where the fluid stress is , is the surface of the swimmer over one wavelength, and is the unit normal to the sheet into the fluid. We thus seek the set of coefficients that maximize the hydrodynamic efficiency, , defined as

(4)

and numerically compute the value of the swimming speed, , and surface stress, .

In order to impose velocity conditions on the surface of the sheet, we solve the problem in a frame of reference that moves with the propagating wave. Since the sheet is stationary in this frame, the velocity of material elements is purely tangential Lighthill (1975). By subtracting the normalized wave speed, this allows us to retrieve the boundary conditions everywhere along the sheet as

(5)

where denotes the ratio between the arclength of the waveform in one wavelength to the wavelength measured along the direction and is the tangent angle of the sheet measured about the axis. Both the value of and the distribution of are functions of the wave geometry only, and thus of the coefficients .

Iii Computational approach

In order to compute the flow field generated by the sheet, and the resultant surface stresses, we employ the boundary element method Youngren and Acrivos (1975) with two-dimensional, periodic Green’s functions as in Pozrikidis (1987) and Sauzade et al. (2011). At any point along the sheet, the velocity at that point is given by the surface integral

(6)

where is the unit normal pointing into the fluid at and . Using the notation , the stokeslet tensor, , and stresslet, , are given by

(7)

and represent the solution to Stokes flow due to a point force in two dimensions and the corresponding stress respectively. Since we are modeling an infinite, -periodic sheet, we have velocity contributions at from an infinite sum of stokeslets and stresslets,

(8)

where for singularities positioned at . These infinite sums may be conveniently expressed in a closed form as

(9)

where . Note that these are equivalent to, but differ by a minus sign from, those found in Sauzade et al. (2011), due to our adoption of the sign convention from Pozrikidis (1987).

For the computational procedure, the sheet is discretized into straight line segments of constant force per unit length, i.e. the components in equation (6) are constant over each straight line element. This discretization breaks equation (6) into a sum of line integrals of singularities, multiplied by the unknown force per unit length. Numerical evaluation of each non-singular line integral is performed with four-point Gaussian quadrature, whilst singular integrals are treated analytically. This numerical discretization produced a relative difference in the calculated swimming velocity and efficiency for both kinked and unkinked example sheets when compared to simulations with and elements with - and -point Gaussian quadrature, whilst still allowing calculation in a reasonable time. By decoupling the numerical quadrature from the force discretization, comparable accuracy is achieved for relatively smaller linear systems Smith (2009). The computational mesh is refined locally around regions of high curvature appearing as a result of the optimization in order to resolve potential kinks and singular shapes. Using these parameters, we find convergence of the waveform and optimal efficiency for . In order to reach this number of coefficients quickly, it is important to provide a good starting guess for the coefficients at the beginning of the optimization procedure. Since we are interested in the convergence of our waveform with an increased number of points, we numerically optimize for sequentially, and use the converged optimal coefficients for the waveform as an initial guess for the waveform, with initially set to zero. In order to ensure that our solution represents the global maximum of the hydrodynamic efficiency (4), multiple initial conditions were tried, all found to be optimized to the same waveform. Optimization is carried out using the standard fminunc function in Matlab using the quasi-newton algorithm.

Iv The shape of the optimal swimming sheet

Figure 2: The optimal swimming sheet. (a) Optimal waveform obtained computationally, which exhibits an almost straight region followed by a steepening of the wave crest into a rounded cap; (b) Three-dimensional visualization of the optimal swimming sheet; Distribution of slope (c) and curvature (d) of the optimal waveform showing largely straight regions; (e) Waveform of the optimal sheet shown for comparison with the pure sine-wave predicted by small amplitude theory Taylor (1951) and Lighthill’s optimal triangle wave for a flagellum with drag anisotropy ratio of Lighthill (1975).

With this framework established, we are able to compute the shape of the optimal swimming sheet. It is first instructive to ask what would be predicted from the analytical small-amplitude approach. In that case, the waveform is written as

(10)

where is a small dimensionless amplitude. To second order in the amplitude Taylor (1951), the swimming speed, , and work done against the fluid, , are given by

(11)

Because the work done is proportional to , whereas the swimming velocity is proportional to , higher-order modes are energetically penalized compared to lower modes. Therefore for a fixed amount of mechanical power expended by the swimmer, it is more efficient to distribute all of that power to the first mode ; under the small amplitude approximation, the most efficient waveform is therefore a single sine-wave of period .

Relaxing the small-amplitude constraint, we show in Fig. 2a the optimal waveform obtained numerically for odd Fourier modes. The set of coefficients that describe this waveform are given in Appendix A and a three-dimensional sheet propagating this wave is further shown in Fig. 2b. The optimal swimming sheet appears to take the shape of a regularized cusp wave, qualitatively different from the single-mode sine-wave predicted by the asymptotic analysis. We further plot in Fig. 2c the distribution of slopes along the sheet, showing that the wave has an almost straight section (constant slope), steepening towards smooth wave crest. The angle of the slope at the point of symmetry is approximately , close to the optimum value of obtained for Lighthill’s three-dimensional flagellum via resistive-force theory with a drag anisotropy ratio of Lighthill (1975). We display in Fig. 2d the distribution of curvature along the sheet; while the curvature at the wave crest increases, it remains finite. For comparison, our predicted optimal waveform is plotted against the pure sine-wave of small amplitude theory Taylor (1951) and the triangle wave predicted by Lighthill Lighthill (1975) in Fig. 2e.

Figure 3: Convergence of the swimming efficiency (a) and maximum wave curvature (b) as a function of the number of odd Fourier modes in the optimisation, .

Since our optimization procedure finds the optimal solution for incremental values of the number of coefficients, , used to describe the wave, we can investigate convergence of all optimal waveforms described by ranging from 1 to 30. The convergence for the swimming efficiency is shown in Fig. 3a while the dependence of the maximum curvature on is plotted in Fig. 3b.

Figure 4: Convergence of the shape of the optimal waveform for increasing numbers of odd coefficients. Shapes are shifted by along the direction for visualization.

For , the optimal waveform is over more efficient than the optimal one-mode sine-wave (). The swimming efficiency appears to reach its asymptote near , which corresponds to the peak in the maximum curvature, but thereafter continues to increase slightly before reaching its converged value of . This slight increase is accompanied by a decrease in the maximum curvature of the optimal waveforms for . Up to , it appears that subsequent modes serve to steepen the waveform as it approaches around the crest. Such steepening is likely hydrodynamically favorable in two dimensions since fluid cannot pass around the sheet as it would around three-dimensional flagellum. However, steepening results in a region of high curvature at the wave crest, which induces locally high viscous dissipation in the fluid, and so there appears to be an efficiency trade-off between wave steepening and minimizing curvature. For , the wavelength of the Fourier modes is on the order of the length of the cap on the wave crest. These modes are then able to decrease the maximum curvature without decreasing the slope of the wave, yielding small increases in efficiency until the curvature converges for . We further display the convergence of the optimal waveform as a function of the number of coefficients, , in Fig. 4. Despite the decrease in maximum curvature seen in Fig. 3b for , all waveforms between and are virtually indistinguishable by eye.

Figure 5: Efficiences of optimal truncated ‘cusp-like’ waveforms (12) as a function of number of odd modes in the description and decay rate , showing a maximum at for regularized cusps. The waveform corresponding to this maximum is shown inset (blue, solid) in comparison to the full optimal of fig. 2a (black, dashed), showing good qualitative agreement.

The trade-off between wave steepening and reducing curvature can be further investigated by examining a family of waves of the form

(12)

where is a constant. The value of dictates the decay of the Fourier coefficients with the Fourier mode, and with the choice Eq. (12) leads to the triangular waveform of Lighthill’s optimal flagellum. The choice of alternating sign is informed both by the series for the triangle wave, and by the coefficients of our optimal solution (up to ). Cusps are obtained for and rounded-off waves for and, by truncating the series at small values of , we retrieve an approximate regularized cusp wave. Fig. 5 shows iso-contours of the efficiency of waves described by Eq. (12) for the optimal value of the amplitude, , as a function of the number of coefficients used to describe the wave, , and the decay rate, . The optimal efficiency of such waves occurs when , for and , which corresponds to a slower decay of the fourier modes than Lighthill’s wave. The waveform associated with this optimal is plotted inset in Fig. 5 (blue, solid), showing a strong similarity to our fully converged optimal computed for coefficients (black, dashed).

If a large enough number of odd modes () is used to describe the curve, the kink at the wave crest is sufficiently resolved as to no longer be regularized. In this case, the optimal jumps to an unkinked profile with which and , yielding an efficiency of just and demonstrating the detrimental effect of kinked waveforms on hydrodynamic efficiency when non-local effects are taken into account. The optimal within this family is thus more efficient than any kinked wave. Furthermore, this result suggests that by fully resolving the hydrodynamics around Lighthill’s optimal flagellum, viscous dissipation associated with the kink might also regularize this waveform.

V Discussion

Taylor’s swimming sheet model is commonly used to address a range of phenomena in the biological physics of small-scale locomotion. A natural question to raise is the relevance of a two-dimensional geometry to the three-dimensional locomotion of flagellated cells. In this paper, we used the boundary element method to compute the swimming efficiency of arbitrary waveforms in two dimensions. By focusing on the question of optimal waveform for locomotion, we show that the optimal two-dimensional waveform is a regularized cusp, which is about 25% more efficient than a simple sine-wave. This result is different from the three-dimensional hydrodynamically-optimal triangle wave derived by Lighthill Lighthill (1975); the slope of the straight section is shallower, the waveform steepens towards the wave crest and there is no discontinuity in the slope but rather a regularized cusp. The result is also different to the three-dimensional internally-optimal wave, which is composed of circular arcs joined by straight lines Lauga and Eloy (2013). Although it is know that the dynamics of a swimming sheet can provide qualitative insight into the hydrodynamics of small-scale locomotion, differences with three-dimensional results exist therefore at large amplitude.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Gwynn Elfring for useful discussions. This work was funded in part by the European Union through a Marie Curie CIG to EL.

Appendix A Coefficients of the optimal waveform

The Fourier coefficients for the optimal waveform for are given by

References

  1. D. Bray, Cell Movements (Garland Publishing, New York, NY, 2000).
  2. J. Lighthill, Mathematical Biofluiddynamics (SIAM, 1975).
  3. S. Childress, Mechanics of Swimming and Flying (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981).
  4. G. I. Taylor, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 209, 447 (1951).
  5. G. J. Hancock, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 217, 96 (1953).
  6. J. B. Keller and S. I. Rubinow, J. Fluid Mech. 75, 705 (1976).
  7. R. E. Johnson, J. Fluid Mech. 99, 411 (1980).
  8. J. Gray and G. J. Hancock, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
  9. T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, A. A. Smith, D. J. Smith, D. Loghin, and J. R. Blake, Euro. Phys. J. E 35, 1 (2012).
  10. J. C. Chrispell, L. J. Fauci, and M. Shelley, Phys. Fluids 25, 013103 (2013).
  11. G. J. Elfring and E. Lauga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 088101 (2009).
  12. G. J. Elfring, O. S. Pak, and E. Lauga, J. Fluid Mech. 646, 505 (2010).
  13. G. J. Elfring and E. Lauga, J. Fluid Mech. 674, 163 (2011).
  14. E. Lauga, Phys. Fluids 19, 083104 (2007).
  15. J. Teran, L. Fauci, and M. Shelley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 038101 (2010).
  16. T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, D. J. Smith, and D. Loghin, Phys. Fluids 25, 081903 (2013).
  17. M. Sauzade, G. J. Elfring, and E. Lauga, Physica D 240, 1567 (2011).
  18. C. Brennen and H. Winet, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 339 (1977).
  19. S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 058103 (2011).
  20. S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Phys. Fluids 22, 031901 (2010).
  21. E. Lauga and C. Eloy, J. Fluid Mech. 730, R1 (2013).
  22. O. Pironneau and D. F. Katz, J. Fluid Mech. 66, 391 (1974).
  23. D. Tam and A. E. Hosoi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068105 (2007).
  24. D. Tam and A. E. Hosoi, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (2011).
  25. G. K. Youngren and A. Acrivos, J. Fluid Mech. 69, 377 (1975).
  26. C. Pozrikidis, J. Fluid Mech. 180, 495 (1987).
  27. D. J. Smith, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 465, 3605 (2009).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
75630
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description