The Habitable-zone Planet Finder Calibration System

The Habitable-zone Planet Finder Calibration System


We present the design concept of the wavelength calibration system for the Habitable-zone Planet Finder instrument (HPF), a precision radial velocity (RV) spectrograph designed to detect terrestrial-mass planets around M-dwarfs. HPF is a stabilized, fiber-fed, R50,000 spectrograph operating in the near-infrared (NIR) z/Y/J bands from 0.84 to 1.3 microns. For HPF to achieve 1 m s or better measurement precision, a unique calibration system, stable to several times better precision, will be needed to accurately remove instrumental effects at an unprecedented level in the NIR. The primary wavelength calibration source is a laser frequency comb (LFC), currently in development at NIST Boulder, discussed separately in these proceedings. The LFC will be supplemented by a stabilized single-mode fiber Fabry-Perot interferometer reference source and Uranium-Neon lamp. The HPF calibration system will combine several other new technologies developed by the Penn State Optical-Infrared instrumentation group to improve RV measurement precision including a dynamic optical coupling system that significantly reduces modal noise effects. Each component has been thoroughly tested in the laboratory and has demonstrated significant performance gains over previous NIR calibration systems.

Near-infrared spectroscopy, wavelength references, exoplanets, radial velocity surveys


1 Introduction

Wavelength calibration is a critical element in any high resolution spectrograph, particularly in the context of precision Doppler measurements. A stable frequency source referenced to an atomic standard is needed to accurately discern instrumental drift from stellar radial velocity shifts. Molecular I absorption cells and Thorium-Argon emission lamps have sufficient line density to yield 1 m s overall instrument precision for stabilized high resolution optical instruments[1, 2], but have few features at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. Currently, no comparable atomic lamps or molecular absorption cells have demonstrated similar measurement precisions in the NIR. Future NIR Doppler instruments such as the Habitable-zone Planet Finder (HPF[3]) on the 10-m Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) and the Calar Alto high-Resolution search for M dwarfs with Exo-earths with Near-infrared and optical Echelle Spectrographs (CARMENES[4]) on the 3.5 m telescope at the Calar Alto Observatory will require specialized wavelength calibration systems as these instruments aim to achieve 1 m s precision in the NIR.

This paper summarizes the overall design of the HPF calibration system and discusses some of the new technologies incorporated to increase calibration precision. Section 2 discusses the array of wavelength references available to HPF for calibration. Section 3 outlines a new modal noise reduction system for coherent calibration sources. An overview of the optomechanical design of the complete system is presented in Section 4.

2 Calibration Sources

HPF will use a suite of wavelength calibration sources to complete a wide range of science goals. The primary calibration source for high precision radial velocity measurements will be a broadband Laser Frequency Comb (LFC), discussed separately in these proceedings. The LFC produces a dense grid of emission features, stable at the 10 cm s level[5], across the entire instrument focal plane. The frequency comb has a much richer intrinsic spectrum than a typical atomic lamp (see Figure 1) and is the ideal source for high precision wavelength calibration. A custom, stabilized single-mode fiber (SMF) fabry-perot (FFP) etalon will also be available for precise short-term calibration. Tests with a prototype H-band FFP device showed the device to be stabile to m s [6]. The HPF FFP will build on the success of the prototype device and yield relative higher measurement precision than typical atomic lamps. Uranium-Neon and Thorium-Argon lamps[7] will be used as secondary calibration sources for more coarse wavelength calibration.

Figure 1: Theoretical photon-limited velocity precision[8] comparison of NIR wavelength calibration sources for each order in the HPF bandpass. Simulations assume a resolution of 50,000, three-pixel sampling, and a signal-to-noise of 200 in the extracted spectrum. The LFC and fabry-perot sources give significantly better measurement precisions than atomic lamp sources.

3 Modal Noise Reduction System

Several next generation spectrographs, including HPF, will use coherent emission line calibration sources (like LFCs and Fabry-Perot cavities) to achieve precision sufficient to detect earth-size planets. Many of these photonic sources couple light from single-mode fibers into the larger core multi-mode fibers used in these spectrographs. This coupling leads to very few modes being excited, thereby exacerbating the modal noise measured by the spectrograph. Commercial fiber mode scramblers have been used to reduce this issue for visible wavelength instruments, but are not the complete solution in the NIR due to the decreased number of modes at longer wavelengths (). This is an increasingly pressing problem for high precision RV spectrographs that require both high stability and high signal-to-noise. As a prime example of modal noise effects: our tests with a NIR LFC on the Pathfinder spectrograph[7] were limited at 10 m s due to modal noise, despite the LFC being intrinsically stable to significantly higher precision[5]. Bulk mechanical agitation of the fiber can be sufficient for continuum sources (e.g. starlight) but does not suppress modal noise at levels required for high precision RV measurements when using narrow line-width calibration sources.

Figure 2: Laboratory modal noise measurement apparatus. Light from a narrow-band 1550 nm fiber laser is coupled to a 300 micron test fiber through a NIR optimized integrating sphere. A 45 degree mirror on a motorized rotation stage is placed opposite to the illumination fiber. This ensures the input beam is periodically redirected within the sphere during a given exposure, thereby maximizing modal mixing in the output fiber.

Our solution to this issue is to use a combination of diffusion and temporal illumination variation at the fiber input to maximize mode mixing within the fiber. Our laboratory test apparatus is shown in Figure 2. Light from a narrow-band (1 MHz) 1550 nm laser is coupled to a 300 micron test fiber through an integrating sphere. This increases the number of injected modes propagating through the fiber and provides a very diffuse illumination of the fiber face. Combining the integrating sphere with a rotating mirror element (placed opposite to the single-mode fiber illumination port) further suppresses speckle-induced noise in the fiber output and yields a very stable near-field illumination (see Figure 3). The rotating mirror periodically redirects the input beam within the sphere, further increasing the mode mixing in the fiber. This technique has the benefit of not requiring a mechanical agitator that stresses the fiber and can be used with any calibration source, though is restricted to sources that are bright enough (such as frequency combs and fabry-perot etalons) to yield sufficient flux after considering the losses associated with the integrating sphere. We previously tested a commercial oscillating diffuser element which, when combined with the integrating sphere, significantly reduced modal noise effects[9] but still resulted in some visible speckles at the fiber output. The rotating mirror system results in a smooth output illumination that is insensitive to fiber bends, even when using a monochromatic laser source.

Figure 3: Top: Near-field images of 300 micron multi-mode fiber illuminated with a narrow-band (1 MHz line-width) 1550 nm SMF laser. Each image is taken using a different fiber coupling configuration. In all cases the 300 micron test fiber is illuminated with an F/3.5 beam, roughly equivalent to the illumination from the HET fore-optics. The vertical fringe patterns are due to interference at the detector window. Bottom: Intensity profiles of near field images. The combination of integrating sphere and rotating mirror produce the smoothest near-field image with no visible speckles.

4 Optomechanical Design

The primary purpose of the HPF calibration system is to couple light from a calibration source to the dedicated calibration fiber entering the spectrograph. The system must also reduce modal noise effects and have the ability to couple light from a calibration source into the primary instrument science fiber through the telescope top-end optics (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: Optomechanical design concept of HPF calibration system. Light is coupled to two separate multi-mode fibers through a simple lens system that mimics the input beam from the telescope. An off-axis mirror is inserted into the integrating sphere opposite to the illumination beam and rotated using a DC motor. The mirror scrambles the fiber mode distribution and reduces modal noise in the output. A neutral-density filter wheel set is used to match flux levels of the calibration fiber and science fiber.

The calibration system is built around an octagonal calibration source mount, inspired by the CARMENES calibration unit design[10], that houses a suite of calibration lamps and optical fiber collimators. A rotating mirror selects one of eight calibration slots on a fixed octagonal mount. Light from a given source is then focused into an integrating sphere, reflected off a rotating mirror, and coupled into the primary calibration fiber. A second fiber is used to couple calibration light into the science fiber through the HET Field Calibration Unit (FCU)[11]. The majority of components are commercially available, off-the-shelf products and will be combined on a single 2‘ x 3‘ optical bench. Figure 5 shows the full calibration system model.

Figure 5: 3D Renderings of HPF calibration system. All components will mount to a 2’ x 3’ optical breadboard. The majority of optomechanical parts are commercial off-the-shelf products.

5 Summary

We present the baseline design of the calibration system for the Habitable-zone Planet Finder instrument. The calibration system incorporates several new technologies developed specifically to improve the overall measurement precision of the HPF spectrograph. A dynamic optical coupling system that combines a rotating mirror assembly and an integrating sphere will be implemented to mitigate modal noise issues for the planned broadband frequency comb calibration source. We are also developing a fiber fabry-perot interferometer that will be stable to 1 m s to supplement the laser comb[6]. All components have been thoroughly tested in the laboratory and, when combined with the frequency comb, will enable HPF to reach 1 m s measurement precision.

This work was partially supported by funding from the Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds. The Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds is supported by the Pennsylvania State University, the Eberly College of Science, and the Pennsylvania Space Grant Consortium. We acknowledge support from NSF grants AST 1006676, AST 1126413, AST 1310885, and the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NNA09DA76A) in our pursuit of precision radial velocities in the NIR. SPH acknowledges support from the Penn State Bunton-Waller, and Braddock/Roberts fellowship programs and the Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid program.


  1. A. Tokovinin, D. A. Fischer, M. Bonati, M. J. Giguere, P. Moore, C. Schwab, J. F. P. Spronck, and A. Szymkowiak, “CHIRON - A Fiber Fed Spectrometer for Precise Radial Velocities,” PASP 125, pp. 1336–1347, Nov. 2013.
  2. M. Mayor, F. Pepe, D. Queloz, F. Bouchy, G. Rupprecht, G. Lo Curto, G. Avila, W. Benz, J.-L. Bertaux, X. Bonfils, T. Dall, H. Dekker, B. Delabre, W. Eckert, M. Fleury, A. Gilliotte, D. Gojak, J. C. Guzman, D. Kohler, J.-L. Lizon, A. Longinotti, C. Lovis, D. Megevand, L. Pasquini, J. Reyes, J.-P. Sivan, D. Sosnowska, R. Soto, S. Udry, A. van Kesteren, L. Weber, and U. Weilenmann, “Setting New Standards with HARPS,” The Messenger 114, pp. 20–24, Dec. 2003.
  3. S. Mahadevan, L. Ramsey, C. Bender, R. Terrien, J. T. Wright, S. Halverson, F. Hearty, M. Nelson, A. Burton, S. Redman, S. Osterman, S. Diddams, J. Kasting, M. Endl, and R. Deshpande, “The habitable-zone planet finder: a stabilized fiber-fed NIR spectrograph for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope,” in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 8446, Sept. 2012.
  4. A. Quirrenbach, P. J. Amado, J. A. Caballero, H. Mandel, R. Mundt, A. Reiners, I. Ribas, M. A. Sánchez Carrasco, and W. Seifert, “CARMENES: Calar Alto high-Resolution search for M dwarfs with Exo-earths with Near-infrared and optical Echelle Spectrographs,” in IAU Symposium, A. Sozzetti, M. G. Lattanzi, and A. P. Boss, eds., IAU Symposium 276, pp. 545–546, Nov. 2011.
  5. G. G. Ycas, F. Quinlan, S. A. Diddams, S. Osterman, S. Mahadevan, S. Redman, R. Terrien, L. Ramsey, C. F. Bender, B. Botzer, and S. Sigurdsson, “Demonstration of on-sky calibration of astronomical spectra using a 25 GHz near-IR laser frequency comb,” Optics Express 20, p. 6631, Mar. 2012.
  6. S. Halverson, S. Mahadevan, L. Ramsey, F. Hearty, J. Wilson, J. Holtzman, S. Redman, G. Nave, D. Nidever, M. Nelson, N. Venditti, D. Bizyaev, and S. Fleming, “Development of Fiber Fabry-Perot Interferometers as Stable Near-infrared Calibration Sources for High Resolution Spectrographs,” PASP 126, pp. 445–458, May 2014.
  7. L. W. Ramsey, S. Mahadevan, S. Redman, C. Bender, A. Roy, S. Zonak, S. Sigurdsson, and A. Wolszczan, “The Pathfinder testbed: exploring techniques for achieving precision radial velocities in the near infrared,” in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 7735, July 2010.
  8. F. Bouchy, F. Pepe, and D. Queloz, “Fundamental photon noise limit to radial velocity measurements,”  374, pp. 733–739, Aug. 2001.
  9. S. Mahadevan, S. Halverson, L. Ramsey, and N. Venditti, “Suppression of Fiber Modal Noise Induced Radial Velocity Errors for Bright Emission-line Calibration Sources,” ApJ 786, p. 18, May 2014.
  10. A. Quirrenbach, P. J. Amado, W. Seifert, M. A. Sánchez Carrasco, H. Mandel, J. A. Caballero, R. Mundt, I. Ribas, A. Reiners, M. Abril, J. Aceituno, J. Alonso-Floriano, M. Ammler-von Eiff, G. Anglada-Escude, R. Antona Jiménez, H. Anwand-Heerwart, D. Barrado y Navascués, S. Becerril, V. Bejar, D. Benitez, C. Cardenas, A. Claret, J. Colome, M. Cortés-Contreras, S. Czesla, C. del Burgo, M. Doellinger, R. Dorda, S. Dreizler, C. Feiz, M. Fernandez, D. Galadi, R. Garrido, J. González Hernández, J. Guardia, E. Guenther, E. de Guindos, J. Gutiérrez-Soto, H. J. Hagen, A. Hatzes, P. Hauschildt, J. Helmling, T. Henning, E. Herrero, A. Huber, K. Huber, S. Jeffers, V. Joergens, E. de Juan, M. Kehr, A. Klutsch, M. Kürster, S. Lalitha, W. Laun, U. Lemke, R. Lenzen, J.-L. Lizon, M. López del Fresno, M. López-Morales, J. López-Santiago, U. Mall, E. Martin, S. Martín-Ruiz, E. Mirabet, D. Montes, J. C. Morales, R. Morales Muñoz, A. Moya, V. Naranjo, R. Oreiro, D. Pérez Medialdea, M. Pluto, O. Rabaza, A. Ramon, R. Rebolo, S. Reffert, P. Rhode, H.-W. Rix, F. Rodler, E. Rodríguez, C. Rodríguez López, E. Rodríguez Pérez, A. Rodriguez Trinidad, R.-R. Rohloff, E. Sánchez-Blanco, J. Sanz-Forcada, S. Schäfer, J. Schiller, C. Schmidt, J. Schmitt, E. Solano, O. Stahl, C. Storz, J. Stürmer, J. C. Suarez, U. Thiele, R. Ulbrich, M. Vidal-Dasilva, K. Wagner, J. Winkler, W. Xu, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, and M. Zechmeister, “CARMENES. I: instrument and survey overview,” in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 8446, Sept. 2012.
  11. H. Lee, G. J. Hill, B. L. Vattiat, M. P. Smith, and M. Haeuser, “Facility calibration unit of Hobby Eberly Telescope wide field upgrade,” in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 8444, Sept. 2012.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description