The different Baryonic Tully Fisher relations

The different baryonic Tully-Fisher relations at low masses.

Abstract

We compare the Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) of simulations and observations of galaxies ranging from dwarfs to spirals, using various measures of rotational velocity V. We explore the BTFR when measuring V at the flat part of the rotation curve, V, at the extent of HI gas, V, and using 20% (W) and 50% (W) of the width of HI line profiles. We also compare with the maximum circular velocity of the parent halo, V, within dark matter only simulations. The different BTFRs increasingly diverge as galaxy mass decreases. Using V  one obtains a power law over four orders of magnitude in baryonic mass, with slope similar to the observed BTFR. Measuring V gives similar results as V when galaxies with rising rotation curves are excluded. However, higher rotation velocities would be found for low mass galaxies if the cold gas extended far enough for V to reach a maximum. W gives a similar slope as V but with slightly lower values of V for low mass galaxies, although this may depend on the extent of the gas in your galaxy sample. W bends away from these other relations toward low velocities at low masses. By contrast, V bends toward high velocities for low mass galaxies, as cold gas does not extend out to the radius at which halos reach V. Our study highlights the need for careful comparisons between observations and models: one needs to be consistent about the particular method of measuring V, and precise about the radius at which velocities are measured.

keywords:
galaxies: evolution - formation - haloes cosmology: theory - dark matter
12

1 Introduction

Galaxies follow a tight relation between optical luminosity and the width of the 21 cm line of neutral hydrogen HI (Tully & Fisher 1977). The 21 cm line-width is a measure of rotation velocity V which reflects total mass within a given radius, while luminosity is a reflection of stellar mass. Other measures of V  have subsequently been used in deriving the Tully-Fisher relation, using information from the full rotation curves of galaxies (e.g. Verheijen, 2001; McGaugh, 2005; Kuzio de Naray et al., 2006; Noordermeer & Verheijen, 2007; Yegorova & Salucci, 2007; Oh et al., 2011), and luminosity is often converted to stellar masses, making the relation between V and stellar mass more explicit.



Name
M M M R R V V R V W W R V

(M) (M) (M) (kpc) (kpc) (kpc) (km/s) (km/s) (kpc) (km/s) (km/s) (km/s) (kpc) (km/s)




g15784_MW
1.4910 5.6710 4.0410 3.23 31.9 46.3 225.7 212.0 26.8 218.8 500.5 404.8 54.90 183.0

g21647_MW
8.2410 2.5110 8.5110 1.30 14.5 33.9 164.4 150.7 17.1 157.5 390.0 350.0 38.15 161.6

g1536_MW
7.1010 2.3610 1.2010 3.46 33.2 42.0 165.8 157.6 8.48 170.8 386.2 349.9 52.86 142.9

g5664_MW
5.3910 2.7410 7.2510 2.34 17.4 42.4 162.4 137.6 12.6 169.0 399.8 368.5 39.15 124.6

g7124_MW
4.4710 6.3010 6.9910 2.79 15.3 30.7 126.0 120.7 12.3 118.2 218.6 154.8 38.15 135.1

g15807_Irr
2.8210 1.4610 7.6610 1.94 17.0 25.9 134.7 123.3 10.4 137.0 289.4 179.2 32.99 101.0

g15784_Irr
1.7010 4.2610 5.1110 2.27 12.8 19.6 110.4 104.1 12.2 104.8 210.4 183.6 27.45 91.51

g22437_Irr
1.1010 7.4410 1.8710 1.88 7.87 12.4 75.95 77.14 6.44 69.44 141.0 104.9 27.32 66.69

g21647_Irr
9.6510 1.9810 9.5510 1.75 7.74 21.2 60.51 61.89 7.70 56.15 111.1 80.00 19.08 80.81

g1536_Irr
8.0410 4.4610 1.2510 1.70 7.73 14.9 64.97 68.63 9.14 61.66 94.15 65.37 26.43 71.49

g5664_Irr
5.8710 2.3610 7.5010 1.66 6.82 13.6 54.85 61.14 8.92 55.27 105.3 58.36 19.58 62.31

g7124_Irr
5.2310 1.3210 7.1310 1.16 7.19 11.1 51.53 54.19 7.37 48.05 81.40 52.73 19.08 67.56

g15807_dIrr
3.0410 1.6010 1.3110 1.26 2.96 7.77 29.93 41.86 8.00 41.22 53.70 37.36 16.50 50.49

g15784_dIrr
1.7710 8.9810 2.1210 0.73 1.48 2.06 23.26 27.41 3.92 34.09 38.08 18.68 13.73 45.75

g22437_dIrr
1.1910 5.0510 1.6110 0.17 1.23 1.59 21.92 23.52 1.08 20.09 27.75 12.79 13.66 36.17

g1536_dIrr
9.6910 7.2010 1.7910 0.17 1.04 1.58 21.72 25.33 1.58 24.10 41.96 16.81 13.22 35.74


Table 1: Properties of the MaGICC galaxies ordered by halo mass. R and V are measured at N=1M/pc and N=10cm

For low mass galaxies, which become increasingly gas rich (Geha et al., 2006; Bradford et al., 2015), a tighter relation is found when V is plotted against the total observable baryonic mass M, i.e. stellar mass plus cold gas mass (Freeman, 1999; McGaugh et al., 2000). As argued in McGaugh (2012), the gas dominance in low mass galaxies minimises the importance of the error in stellar mass, allowing relatively accurate measurements of M when deriving the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR).

However, low mass galaxies are more problematic when it comes to determining V. For high mass galaxies, rotation curves generally rise sharply (Roberts & Rots, 1973; Rubin et al., 1978), and some then drop before flattening at the outer parts (e.g. Sofue & Rubin, 2001; Noordermeer & Verheijen, 2007), at a velocity which can then be defined as V, a common measure of V used in BTFRs. By contrast, rotation curves of low mass galaxies rise more gently (e.g. Lelli et al., 2013) and although they do start to flatten beyond about 2 disc scale-lengths, they are often still rising at the last measured point (e.g. Catinella et al., 2006; Swaters et al., 2009). To extend the V BTFR to low mass galaxies, Stark et al. (2009) select galaxies with rotation curves that are approximately flat in their outer regions, according to some flatness criteria.

The low mass end of the BTFR is also problematic when measuring V using HI line widths. The discrepancy between measuring the HI line-width at 20 per cent (W) and 50 per cent (W) of its peak value is typically 25 kms (Koribalski et al., 2004; Bradford et al., 2015), which becomes an increasing fraction of the measured rotation velocity at lower masses.

Observational studies have shown that the way V is measured (V, V, W, W) will result in different T-F and BTF relations (e.g. Verheijen, 2001; Noordermeer & Verheijen, 2007; McGaugh, 2012; Bradford et al., 2016). Further, sample selection also plays a role (Sorce & Guo, 2016). Understanding the difference in measured values of V has important implications for interpreting the BTFR, which is used as a crucial constraint on theoretical models (e.g. Dutton & van den Bosch, 2009; Trujillo-Gomez et al., 2011; McGaugh, 2012; Dutton, 2012; Brook et al., 2012). As recently shown (Brook & Di Cintio, 2015; Brook & Shankar, 2015), these differences in measures of V also significantly affect the interpretation of the observed velocity function, i.e. the number of galaxies at given Vwithin a given volume (Zavala et al., 2009; Obreschkow et al., 2009; Papastergis et al., 2011; Klypin et al., 2014).

In this paper, we explore the BTFR of the MaGICC suite of simulated galaxies (Brook et al., 2012; Stinson et al., 2013), comparing the derived BTFRs when measuring V in different ways. We show, in particular, that the different forms of the BTFR become increasingly divergent at low masses. The paper is organized as follows: Sec 2 presents the simulations, describing initial conditions and baryonic modelling. The rotation curves and HI line-widths are shown in Sec 3.1 & 3.2, respectively. The various derived measures of V are then shown in Sec 3.3, and the different forms of the BTFR in Sec 3.4, with implications discussed in Sec 4.

2 The Simulations

We use ‘zoom’ hydro-dynamical simulations from the MaGICC (Making Galaxies in a Cosmological Context) project (Brook et al., 2012; Stinson et al., 2013). The initial power spectrum is derived from the McMaster Unbiased Galaxy Simulations (Stinson et al., 2010) which use a CDM cosmology with WMAP3 parameters. The simulated galaxies cover a range of merger histories and formation times, but are all isolated. Therefore, whether environment has an effect on our results cannot be answered in this study.

The simulated galaxies are evolved using the parallel N-body+SPH tree-code GASOLINE (Wadsley et al., 2004), which includes gas hydrodynamics and cooling, star formation, energy feedback and metal enrichment. We describe here the most important implementations (for details see Stinson et al. 2013).

When gas gets cold and dense, stars form at rate . Stars feed energy and metals to the surrounding interstellar medium. Energy feedback by supernovae is implemented using the blastwave formalism (Stinson et al., 2006), releasing erg of thermal energy, where we set =1, i..e we release all available SN energy in thermal form, even though observations indicate that a significant amount of the energy is radiated away. The reason is because thermal energy is radiated away rapidly in the simulations for numerical reasons, due to lack of resolution (see Stinson et al. 2013 for a full discussion). The metals deposited from SNe are computed from a Chabrier IMF. The composition of each gas particle is traced throughout the simulation, being comprised of H, He and a range of metals recycled from supernova explosions and deposited to the surrounding gas particles (see Stinson et al. 2006), with metal diffusion between gas particles also included (Shen et al., 2010). GASOLINE includes the effect of a uniform background radiation field on the ionization and excitation state of the gas. Metal-line cooling (Shen et al., 2010) and feedback from massive stars (Stinson et al., 2013) prior to their explosion as SNe are also included.

Figure 1: Comparisons of the sizes of the simulated galaxies with observations, in HI gas and star light. Observational data sets are shown in the legends. Top Panel: Green circles show Mof the simulations as a function of the diameter (D) where the HI surface density drops below 1 M pc. Middle panel: D as a function of D  where D is 6.4 times the disc scale length. Bottom panel: Red circles show D where the HI surface density drops below 10 cm verses M.

Radiative cooling has three parts =++. where is net cooling due to (H, H, He, He and He), is the rate due to metals, and is the Compton cooling and heating. For , cooling and heating rates are calculated directly from the ionization equations, meaning the simulations capture the non-equilibrium cooling of primordial species. Each timestep takes the abundance of ions at the end of the previous step as the starting point. Ionization, cooling and heating rates match those of Abel et al. (1997). For calculating HI fractions at z=0, we post process to include self-shielding, following Appendix 2 in Rahmati et al. (2013a) and ionization from star forming regions following Rahmati et al. (2013b), using their Eqn 5 which relates star formation to gas surface density. The amount of HI is somewhat sensitive to the manner in which ionization rates are modeled, with neutral hydrogen masses around a factor of two larger using these models than when assuming that the ISM is optically thin.

There are 16 galaxies, separated into three sub-sets, labelled as Milky-Way (MW), irregular (Irr) and dwarf irregular (dIrr) types, with stellar masses ranging 510-510M. Resolution varies depending on the “type”: MW types have m=4.010M, m=5.710M, m=1.110M and a gravitational softening length of =312pc (for all particle types); Irr’s have m=4.310M, m=7.110M, m=1.410M and =156pc; and dIrr’s have m=5.710M, m=1.110M, m=1.710M and =78pc.

The halos are identified using AHF (Knollmann & Knebe, 2009) with halo masses defined within a sphere containing 350 times the cosmic matter density at z=0. The bulk of the analysis is done using pynbody (Pontzen et al., 2013).

For the simulations, we use baryon mass M=M+4/3M  with the factor of 4/3 used to account for forms of gas other than HI, in a manner that mimics observational assumptions of the comparison data (e.g. McGaugh, 2012). M remains an approximation since an accurate model of HI mass would require full radiative transfer. In particular self shielding from the UV background is not included. This uncertainty in the fraction of gas classified as HI will not affect our rotation curve shapes, but may affect the extent of the HI discs and hence the radius at which we measure V. Disk scale lengths are derived from exponential fits to the surface brightness profiles in the I band: each stellar particle from the simulation represents a single stellar population (SSP) for which an absolute magnitude in a particular bandpass is calculated, interpolating between a grid of SSP luminosities from Girardi et al. (2010) and Marigo et al. (2008) for various stellar ages and metallicities. We note that scale-lengths in Swaters et al. 2009 and Lelli et al. 2014 use the R band, which won’t significantly effect the comparison.

Basic galaxy parameters are shown in Table 1, including halo mass (M), stellar mass (M), HI gas mass (M), disc scale length , the extent of the HI disc R, defined as the radius at which the HI density of the galaxy falls to 1M pc, which is adopted in several observational studies (eg. Broeils & Rhee, 1997; Swaters et al., 2002; Noordermeer et al., 2005; Lelli et al., 2014), although we note that the Begum et al. (2008) data set which comprises a significant fraction of the observed low mass galaxies, uses a threshold of 10cm. We examine both thresholds in Fig 1 which compares the sizes of the simulated galaxies with observations, in HI gas and star light. Observational data come from Broeils & Rhee (1997); Swaters et al. (2002); Noordermeer et al. (2005); Lelli et al. (2014) and Begum et al. (2008).

Fig 1 plots D against M and D. Green and red circles in the top and bottom panels show the simulations when defining the diameter (D) as where the HI surface density drops below 1 M/pc and 10 cm respectively. Fits to the observed D-M relation are shown as red lines. We will use this relation to define a radius R= D/2 where we measure the circular velocity V, which results in a measure of V for each simulation at a radius that is similar to that of observed galaxies of the same M. D is defined as 6.4 times the disc scale length, and is used as an indication of the extent of star light in galaxies. This is considered better than using an isophotal diameter at e.g. 25 B-mag arcsec, as only a small fraction of the disk is enclosed within the isophotal diameter in low surface brightness galaxies (Swaters et al. 2002).

The simulations fall reasonably within the range of observed galaxies, giving some confidence in the mass distributions of the baryons (see also Santos-Santos et al. 2016). Larger, uniform samples of simulations and observations are required to make careful statistical comparisons including determination of scatter. Regardless, the focus of this paper is on how different measures of V give different BTFRs, with which we will proceed.

Figure 2: Circular velocity rotation curves of the simulated galaxies, with different lines for the different components: solid for cold gas; dashed for stars; dot-dashed for dark matter; thin solid with circles for total. The circles in the total rotation curve mark multiples of . The curves extend to R, or to R in cases of rising rotation curves, in which cases R is marked as a dotted (dashed) vertical line when defined at 1 M pc (10cm).

3 Analysis and Results

3.1 Rotation curves

Figure 2 shows the circular velocity rotation curves of the simulated galaxies, computed using the gravitational potential of the simulation along the mid-plane of the aligned disc. This is more accurate than just assuming a spherically symmetric potential and averaging mass inside spherical shells (i.e. the classical V=GM/r). The contribution from each mass component is plotted as a different linestyle: cold gas thick solid; stars dashed; DM dot-dashed; total, thin solid with circles marking integer multiples of . Rotation curves are plotted out to R, or to R, whichever is larger. Vertical dotted (dashed) lines show R in cases where RR, using density threshold of 1 M pc (10cm).

Whether the shapes of the rotation curves match, in detail, the distribution of observed galaxy rotation curve shapes requires a larger sample of simulations and is beyond the scope of this paper. We note that Oman et al. (2015) found that the EAGLE simulations (Schaye et al., 2015) were not able to reproduce the variation in rotation curve shapes that is observed, in particular they could not simulate galaxies with slowly rising rotation curves. They showed that the MaGICC simulations, as used here, did form galaxies with such slowly rising rotation curves, as can be seen in Fig 2. Yet some observed low mass galaxies have more steeply rising rotation curves (e.g. Swaters et al. 2009). A larger suite of simulations will allow us to determine whether or not we can recover the full variation in rotation curve shapes that are seen in observations, which we will explore in a forthcoming study.

3.2 HI linewidths

The observations of V relevant to this study are based on HI radio data, so we constructed mock HI data cubes. We derive HI line widths for the simulated galaxies, using inclinations 45, 60 and edge-on. In Fig 3 we show the global HI line profiles for inclinations of 60, indicating 20% and 50% of the maximum flux by horizontal dashed and dot-dashed lines respectively. The quoted values of W and W in Table 1 are calculated by taking the average of the inclination corrected line-widths from the different inclinations 45, 60 and edge-on. The results we present do not change significantly if any single inclination is chosen.

Figure 3: HI line profiles of the MaGICC galaxies, shown for inclinations of 60 in each case.

Fig 4 shows the ratio W/W as a function of W/2 for the simulations (red circles) and HIPASS data (Meyer et al. 2004 black dots). The relation W=W+25 is also shown (cyan line), the typical difference between the observed W and W (Koribalski et al., 2004; Bradford et al., 2015). The offset between W and W becomes significant for lower velocities/masses, with the relation WW25 implying that at W/2=[50,40,30], W/2 is [25,31,42] per cent lower. Our simulations suggest that this simple relation holds down to very low velocities/masses.

3.3 Measurements of rotation velocity

We note some nomenclature used in this paper:

V: the circular velocity at the flat part of the rotation curve.
R: the radius at which V is reached.
V: the circular velocity at the last point of the HI disc.
R: the extent of the HI disc: defines where V is measured.
D: diameter of the HI disc: 2 R.
V: the V from the DM only simulations.
R: the radius at which V is reached.
: disc scale length.

The criteria for selecting flat rotation curves in Stark et al. (2009) requires that V measured at 3 disc scale lengths (3) is 85 per cent of V, or in cases where R is greater than 4, then V measured at 4 is required to be 90 per cent of V. This definition has a degree of arbitrariness, as it depends on the relative distance between R and integer multiples of . In this study, we define rotation curves to be flat in the regions where V changes by less than 5 per cent between integer multiples of . We define V at the flattest of these flat regions, i.e. where the change in V is the smallest, within the HI disc (in regions where radiusR). V is measured at the centre of the flattest region within the HI disc.

Our flatness criteria are better defined than those used in Stark et al. (2009), and are also stricter for galaxies with R 5, (69 per cent of galaxies in the Swaters et al. 2009 data set from which Stark et al. 2009 was largely drawn), is at least as strict for galaxies with 5R6 (a further 9 per cent of Swaters et al. 2009 galaxies), but may not be as strict for galaxies with R 6 (12 per cent of Swaters et al. 2009 sample).

Figure 4: The ratio W/W plotted as a function of W/2 for the simulations (red circles) overplayed on HiPass data (black dots), with the relation W=W25. also shown as a cyan line.

Some of our low mass simulated galaxies do not have any flat regions at radii lower than R. These are deemed to be galaxies with slowly rising rotation curves. In such cases, marked with in Table 1, we continue beyond R until we find the first flat region of the rotation curve, i.e. a region where V increases by less than 5 per cent as radius increases by . V is then measured at the central point of this flat region. Galaxies with rising rotation curves will be identified in our BTFR plot, and are analogous to those galaxies that are in studies of observed V BTFRs (e.g. Stark et al., 2009; McGaugh, 2012; McGaugh & Schombert, 2015).

3.4 The Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation

Figure 5 shows the different BTFRs for the different V measurements of our simulated suite of galaxies. These are: V (orange circles), V defined using 1 M/pc (purple squares) and 10 cm (green squares), V (blues stars) which uses the observed M-R relation to determine the radius to measure V based on the M of each simulation, W/2 (pink triangles), W/2 (red diamonds) and V (black crosses).

Overplotted are observational BTFRs: the solid line shows the fit found in Lelli et al. (2016) using V from observations of gas-rich galaxies log(M)=3.95log(V)+1.86, a relation very similar to that found in McGaugh & Schombert (2015); the dashed line shows the relation found by Bradford et al. 2015 using W measurements of galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, log(W/2)= 0.277log(M)0.672; the dotted line shows the W relation determined by using W=W25. We found a similar W BTFR using local volume data as compiled by Karachentsev et al. 2013, but do not overplot here as it adds to clutter without adding information. We also show a theoretical (dot-dashed) line from Di Cintio & Lelli (2016), which uses a semi-empirical model within a Cold Dark Matter cosmology, measured in the flat region of the rotation curve.

For simulated galaxies with M210M the V, V and W BTFRs are similar. This corresponds to galaxies with V45kms living in halos with M510M. W and W are integrated measurements that are intrinsically more sensitive to contribution from the rising part of the rotation curves at small radii, which contains most of the HI flux, explaining their difference with V. The difference WW25 holds over a large range of masses, meaning that the W BTFR does not have a large offset from the other measures of V for massive galaxies: at W/2=[100, 150, 200], W/2 is about [12,9,6] per cent lower than the other measures of V.

Figure 5: BTFRs for the MaGICC galaxies. Different symbols show the relations obtained when using different V measures: V (orange circles), V (green squares), V (blue stars), W/2 (pink triangles), W/2 (red diamonds) and V (black crosses). The solid line is the observational BTFR obtained from gas-rich galaxies using V in McGaugh & Schombert (2015). The dashed line is the W/2 BTFR from Bradford et al. (2015), while the dotted line adjusts this W/2 relation using W=W25, the typical difference between these values as found in Bradford et al. (2015). The V of simulated galaxies with rising rotation curves at their outer point are indicated by a solid red outline: these would be excluded from observed V BTFRs.

The V BTFR differs from V, indicative of the sensitivity of low mass galaxies to the radius at which V is measured. This V BTFR also shows increased scatter at the the HI low mass end, but this is a region where scatter in the observed BTFRs also increases (see e.g. McGaugh 2012; Lelli et al. 2014).

For galaxies with M10M, the different forms of the BTFR increasingly diverge. The V using threshold of 10 cm BTFR of the simulations follow closely the V value of McGaugh & Schombert (2015), which is also close to the V BTFR from Stark et al. (2009).

The V BTFR from the simulations also follows the observed V BTFR if the galaxies with rising rotation curves are neglected, as they are in the observational derivations. Such galaxies are marked with red outlines in Fig 5. Our model suggests that low mass galaxies with rising rotation curves would fall off the V BTFR, having excessively high values of V, if their gas discs would extend far enough for V to be measured.

We also show results from the corresponding dark matter only simulations, which shows how the measured V of disc galaxies becomes a smaller fraction of V. This is due to two related effects: primarily, R becomes a smaller fraction of R for low mass galaxies, which are confined to the inner regions of DM halos (compare R to R in Table 1, and see also Fig 7 of Brook & Shankar 2015); secondly, baryons are able to cool to the central regions of halos, so galaxies with high baryonic masses, i.e. high mass galaxies, have more steeply rising rotation curves in general, meaning that V becomes close to V at relatively small radii.

The shape of dark matter halos can be affected by baryons by either adiabatic contraction (Blumenthal et al., 1986), or expansion (see Pontzen & Governato 2014, for a review). The competing processes mean that the final profile can depend on the amount of gas inflowing to the central region causing contraction, and the timescale and mass of gas outflows causing expansion. Simulations suggest that this results in dark matter density profile shapes being dependent on galaxy mass (Di Cintio et al., 2014b; Chan et al., 2015; Tollet et al., 2016). The rotation curve shapes in the galaxies of this study have been affected by these processes, but as stated above, the detailed study of these shapes is beyond the scope of this paper.

Bearing in mind that a larger number of simulations may be required to define a low mass BTFR, we nevertheless show in Table 2 the best fits to the various BTFRs from Fig. 5, with the form logM=logV+. The difference in slopes between the various forms is significant. We do note that linear fits cannot always be appropriate, for example the relation W=W25 as shown in Fig. 4 implies that if the W BTFR is well fit by a linear relation, then W would not be.

4 Discussion

We have made various measurements of V for a suite of simulated galaxies within a CDM context, and derived the corresponding BTFRs. Measuring V using V, V, V, W, W and V result in significantly different BTFRs, as the different measures of V are found to diverge at low masses. Each BTFR derived using the different measures of V from the simulations is consistent with the corresponding observed BTFRs in cases where observations are possible, i.e. V,V, V, W, W.

V
V 5.19 -.52
W/2 3.13 3.78
W/2 2.70 4.83
V[N1M pc] 3.51 2.85
V[N10cm] 4.02 1.85
V 3.56 2.80
V 3.72 2.43
Table 2: Slopes () and zero points () of the various BTFRs

Correspondence is found between simulations and observations in the V case when appropriate selection of galaxies with flat rotation curves is made, excluding galaxies with rising rotation curves. The simulations indicate that galaxies with rising rotation curves would generally fall off the BTFR if their gas discs extended far enough to measure out to the flat part of the rotation curve.

We conclude that there is no single BTFR, with the relation between the baryonic mass and the rotation velocity of galaxies taking many forms which diverge significantly for low mass galaxies. Differences in the BTFR for different measures of V have been shown for observed galaxies (Verheijen, 2001; Noordermeer & Verheijen, 2007; McGaugh, 2012; Bradford et al., 2016). We show that the BTFR for simulated galaxies also depends on the manner in which rotation velocity is measured, with the BTFRs becoming increasingly different from one another for low mass galaxies.

The various forms of the BTFR emerge from the fundamental processes in galaxy formation, relating to fundamental forces, mass acquisition, angular momentum acquisition, baryon content, gas cooling, star formation, and energy feedback. BTFRs are thus crucial constraints on models that attempt to capture these fundamental processes of galaxy formation, not only in terms of understanding the relation between baryonic and total mass in galaxy populations, but also in terms of the velocity function (Brook & Shankar, 2015), i.e, understanding the BTFR has important implications for how we compare the number of galaxies observed as a function of V, to the number predicted in an CDM cosmology.

Our hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation can explain the various forms of the BTFR within a CDM context. It is instructive to compare our study with two recent CDM cosmological models that have used the BTFR as a constraint, Trujillo-Gomez et al. (2011) and Dutton (2012).

In Trujillo-Gomez et al. (2011), a model population was made by matching M to M following abundance matching, and giving each model galaxy an empirically motivated gas fraction and scale-length. A BTFR was derived by measuring circular velocities at 10 kpc. For galaxies at the high mass end of our study, correspondence with Trujillo-Gomez et al. (2011) is good. This is expected because R extends far enough to reflect the value of V at 10 kpc. For low mass galaxies, the Trujillo-Gomez et al. (2011) BTFR bends toward values of relatively high velocity, in a manner that is very similar to our V BTFR. This is also expected, because R is 10 kpc for such galaxies, as seen in our Table 1, and such galaxies have very low baryon fractions meaning that DM only simulations are not greatly different from their model galaxies.

Dutton (2012) use a semi-analytic model population of galaxies, tuned to match the empirical M-M and specific angular momentum-M relations. They define V as the circular velocity measured at the radius that contains 80 per cent of the cold gas. This is analogous to our V, so it is not surprising that both studies match the V BTFRs from Stark et al. (2009). Dutton (2012) does not test whether all their model galaxies’ rotation curves are actually flat; the rotation curves in some low mass galaxies may still be rising at the point they measure ’V’. In fact, correspondence with observations the existence of low mass galaxies that have rising rotation curves, as was found in our simulations.

The rising rotation curves of many low mass galaxies means that one needs to take particular care when comparing models and theory. Measuring the V BTFR for low mass galaxies requires a selection, with galaxies with rising rotation curves discarded. It is not clear whether this introduces a bias. For example, do low mass galaxies with extended HI discs and flat rotation curves fit on the average M-M relation?

Measuring the V BTFR, on the other hand, is somewhat arbitrary, with the position of measurement determined by the radial extent of the cold gas. The large difference between R and R highlights that V may increase significantly in some cases, if HI discs extended further and allowed measurements at larger radii.

In fact, even when our low mass simulated galaxies meet the criteria for V, i.e. they rise by less than five per cent when radius increases by , they are still measured at a radius that can be a small fraction of R. In these cases, even small gradients in the rotation curve can result in significant difference between the measured V and the V that would be reached if the cold gas extended far enough to measure rotation velocities at their peak value.

To proceed in confronting models with observations, it is suggested to test the BTFR as measured in different ways, at a variety of radii. This also facilitates the evaluation of the variation of rotation curve shapes, which provide further important constraints on galaxy formation models (Gentile et al., 2007; McGaugh et al., 2007; Oman et al., 2015; Brook, 2015). Measuring at radii smaller than R may also allow different cosmological models to be differentiated (Brook & Di Cintio, 2015)

Even better is to exploit the important information provided by the entire rotation curve data of a large sample of galaxies. In a CDM model, one can relate the halo mass as inferred from the fit to the rotation curve to M, and compare this relation to the M-M relation that emerges from abundance matching studies. We will undertake such a procedure in a forthcoming study (Katz, H et al. in prep), comparing a CDM model that assumes an NFW profile (Navarro et al., 1996) with a model where DM halo shapes are modified by baryons (Di Cintio et al., 2014a).

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referee for helpful suggestions. CB thanks MINECO (Spain) for financial support through the grant AYA2012-31101 and the Ramon y Cajal program. We thank DEISA for access to computing resources through DECI projects SIMU-LU and SIMUGAL-LU and the allocation of resources from STFC’s DiRAC Facility (COSMOS: Galactic Archaeology), the DEISA consortium, co-funded through EU FP6 project RI-031513 and the FP7 project RI-222919 (through the DEISA Extreme Computing Initiative), the PRACE-2IP Project (FP7 RI-283493).

Footnotes

  1. pagerange: The different baryonic Tully-Fisher relations at low masses.The different baryonic Tully-Fisher relations at low masses.
  2. pubyear: 2010

References

  1. Abel T., Anninos P., Zhang Y., Norman M. L., 1997, New A, 2, 181
  2. Begum A., Chengalur J. N., Karachentsev I. D., Sharina M. E., Kaisin S. S., 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1667
  3. Blumenthal G. R., Faber S. M., Flores R., Primack J. R., 1986, ApJ, 301, 27
  4. Bradford J. D., Geha M. C., Blanton M. R., 2015, ApJ, 809, 146
  5. Bradford J. D., Geha M. C., van den Bosch F. C., 2016, ArXiv e-prints
  6. Broeils A. H., Rhee M.-H., 1997, A&A, 324, 877
  7. Brook C., Shankar F., 2015, ArXiv e-prints
  8. Brook C. B., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1719
  9. Brook C. B., Di Cintio A., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 2133
  10. Brook C. B., Stinson G., Gibson B. K., Wadsley J., Quinn T., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1275
  11. Catinella B., Giovanelli R., Haynes M. P., 2006, ApJ, 640, 751
  12. Chan T. K., Kereš D., Oñorbe J., Hopkins P. F., Muratov A. L., Faucher-Giguère C.-A., Quataert E., 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2981
  13. Di Cintio A., Brook C. B., Dutton A. A., Macciò A. V., Stinson G. S., Knebe A., 2014a, MNRAS, 441, 2986
  14. Di Cintio A., Brook C. B., Macciò A. V., Stinson G. S., Knebe A., Dutton A. A., Wadsley J., 2014b, MNRAS, 437, 415
  15. Di Cintio A., Lelli F., 2016, MNRAS, 456, L127
  16. Dutton A. A., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 3123
  17. Dutton A. A., van den Bosch F. C., 2009, MNRAS, 396, 141
  18. Freeman K. C., 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 170, The Low Surface Brightness Universe, Davies J. I., Impey C., Phillips S., eds., p. 3
  19. Geha M., Blanton M. R., Masjedi M., West A. A., 2006, ApJ, 653, 240
  20. Gentile G., Tonini C., Salucci P., 2007, A&A, 467, 925
  21. Girardi L. et al., 2010, ApJ, 724, 1030
  22. Karachentsev I. D., Makarov D. I., Kaisina E. I., 2013, AJ, 145, 101
  23. Klypin A., Karachentsev I., Makarov D., Nasonova O., 2014, ArXiv e-prints
  24. Knollmann S. R., Knebe A., 2009, ApJS, 182, 608
  25. Koribalski B. S. et al., 2004, AJ, 128, 16
  26. Kuzio de Naray R., McGaugh S. S., de Blok W. J. G., Bosma A., 2006, ApJS, 165, 461
  27. Lelli F., Fraternali F., Verheijen M., 2013, MNRAS, 433, L30
  28. Lelli F., McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., 2016, ApJ, 816, L14
  29. Lelli F., Verheijen M., Fraternali F., 2014, A&A, 566, A71
  30. Marigo P., Girardi L., Bressan A., Groenewegen M. A. T., Silva L., Granato G. L., 2008, A&A, 482, 883
  31. McGaugh S. S., 2005, ApJ, 632, 859
  32. McGaugh S. S., 2012, AJ, 143, 40
  33. McGaugh S. S., de Blok W. J. G., Schombert J. M., Kuzio de Naray R., Kim J. H., 2007, ApJ, 659, 149
  34. McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., 2015, ApJ, 802, 18
  35. McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., Bothun G. D., de Blok W. J. G., 2000, ApJ, 533, L99
  36. Meyer M. J. et al., 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1195
  37. Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1996, ApJ, 462, 563
  38. Noordermeer E., van der Hulst J. M., Sancisi R., Swaters R. A., van Albada T. S., 2005, A&A, 442, 137
  39. Noordermeer E., Verheijen M. A. W., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1463
  40. Obreschkow D., Croton D., De Lucia G., Khochfar S., Rawlings S., 2009, ApJ, 698, 1467
  41. Oh S.-H., de Blok W. J. G., Brinks E., Walter F., Kennicutt, Jr. R. C., 2011, AJ, 141, 193
  42. Oman K. A. et al., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3650
  43. Papastergis E., Martin A. M., Giovanelli R., Haynes M. P., 2011, ApJ, 739, 38
  44. Pontzen A., Governato F., 2014, Nature, 506, 171
  45. Pontzen A., Roškar R., Stinson G. S., Woods R., Reed D. M., Coles J., Quinn T. R., 2013, pynbody: Astrophysics Simulation Analysis for Python. Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1305.002
  46. Rahmati A., Pawlik A. H., Raičevic M., Schaye J., 2013a, MNRAS, 430, 2427
  47. Rahmati A., Schaye J., Pawlik A. H., Raičevic M., 2013b, MNRAS, 431, 2261
  48. Roberts M. S., Rots A. H., 1973, A&A, 26, 483
  49. Rubin V. C., Thonnard N., Ford, Jr. W. K., 1978, ApJ, 225, L107
  50. Santos-Santos I. M., Brook C. B., Stinson G., Di Cintio A., Wadsley J., Domínguez-Tenreiro R., Gottlöber S., Yepes G., 2016, MNRAS, 455, 476
  51. Schaye J. et al., 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521
  52. Shen S., Wadsley J., Stinson G., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1581
  53. Sofue Y., Rubin V., 2001, ARA&A, 39, 137
  54. Sorce J. G., Guo Q., 2016, MNRAS
  55. Stark D. V., McGaugh S. S., Swaters R. A., 2009, AJ, 138, 392
  56. Stinson G., Seth A., Katz N., Wadsley J., Governato F., Quinn T., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1074
  57. Stinson G. S., Bailin J., Couchman H., Wadsley J., Shen S., Nickerson S., Brook C., Quinn T., 2010, MNRAS, 408, 812
  58. Stinson G. S., Brook C., Macciò A. V., Wadsley J., Quinn T. R., Couchman H. M. P., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 129
  59. Swaters R. A., Sancisi R., van Albada T. S., van der Hulst J. M., 2009, A&A, 493, 871
  60. Swaters R. A., van Albada T. S., van der Hulst J. M., Sancisi R., 2002, A&A, 390, 829
  61. Tollet E. et al., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3542
  62. Trujillo-Gomez S., Klypin A., Primack J., Romanowsky A. J., 2011, ApJ, 742, 16
  63. Verheijen M. A. W., 2001, ApJ, 563, 694
  64. Wadsley J. W., Stadel J., Quinn T., 2004, New A, 9, 137
  65. Yegorova I. A., Salucci P., 2007, MNRAS, 377, 507
  66. Zavala J., Jing Y. P., Faltenbacher A., Yepes G., Hoffman Y., Gottlöber S., Catinella B., 2009, ApJ, 700, 1779
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
127050
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description