V838 Monocerotis

# The Continued Optical to Mid-IR Evolution of V838 Monocerotis †

S. R. Loebman11affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA; sloebman@umich.edu 22affiliation: Postdoctoral Fellow, Michigan Society of Fellows J. P. Wisniewski33affiliation: Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Oklahoma, 440 W. Brooks Street, Norman, OK 73019, USA 44affiliation: Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. S. J. Schmidt55affiliation: Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA A. F. Kowalski66affiliation: NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 671, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA R. K. Barry77affiliation: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Laboratory for Exoplanets & Stellar Astrophysics, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA K. S. Bjorkman44affiliation: Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. 88affiliation: Ritter Observatory, MS #113, Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606-3390, USA H. B. Hammel99affiliation: AURA, 1212 New York Avenue NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20005, USA S. L. Hawley1010affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA L. Hebb1111affiliation: Department of Physics, Hobart & William Smith Colleges, 300 Pulteney Street, Geneva, NY 14456, USA M. M. Kasliwal1212affiliation: The Observatories, Carnegie Institution for Science, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA 1313affiliation: Hubble Fellow D. K. Lynch44affiliation: Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. 1414affiliation: The Aerospace Corporation, M2-266, P. O. Box 92957, Los Angeles, CA 90009-29257, USA ; Guest Observer, NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. R. W. Russell44affiliation: Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. 1414affiliation: The Aerospace Corporation, M2-266, P. O. Box 92957, Los Angeles, CA 90009-29257, USA ; Guest Observer, NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. M. L. Sitko44affiliation: Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NNX-08AE38A with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program. 1515affiliation: Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH 45221, USA ; Guest Observer, NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. ; Also at Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Avenue, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301, USA P. Szkody1010affiliation: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
###### Abstract

The eruptive variable V838 Monocerotis gained notoriety in 2002 when it brightened nine magnitudes in a series of three outbursts and then rapidly evolved into an extremely cool supergiant. We present optical, near-IR, and mid-IR spectroscopic and photometric observations of V838 Monocerotis obtained between 2008 and 2012 at the Apache Point Observatory m, NASA IRTF 3m, and Gemini South 8m telescopes. We contemporaneously analyze the optical & IR spectroscopic properties of V838 Monocerotis to arrive at a revised spectral type L3 supergiant and effective temperature T K. Because there are no existing optical observational data for L supergiants in the optical, we speculate that V838 Monocerotis may represent the prototype for L supergiants in this wavelength regime. We find a low level of H emission present in the system, consistent with interaction between V838 Monocerotis and its B3V binary; however, we cannot rule out a stellar collision as the genesis event, which could result in the observed H activity. Based upon a two-component blackbody fit to all wavelengths of our data, we conclude that, as of 2009, a shell of ejecta surrounded V838 Monocerotis at a radius of R26310 AU with a temperature of T285 K. This result is consistent with IR interferometric observations from the same era and predictions from the Lynch et al.  model of the expanding system, which provides a simple framework for understanding this complicated system.

dust, variable stars, stellar eruptions, red novae
$\dagger$$\dagger$footnotetext: This publication is partially based on observations obtained with the Apache Point Observatory 3.5 m telescope, which is owned and operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium.

## 1. Introduction

V838 Monocerotis (henceforth V Mon) is a dramatic stellar object: in 2002, it brightened nine magnitudes during three outbursts (Brown et al., 2002; Goranskii et al., 2002), experienced a variety of distinctive optical and infrared (IR) changes (Wisniewski et al., 2003; Lynch et al., 2004; Rushton et al., 2005; Geballe et al., 2007), and eventually morphed into a L-type supergiant (Evans et al., 2003). V838 Mon is estimated to be located at a distance of 6.21.2kpc (Sparks et al., 2008) and is embedded in a sparse, young cluster with an upper age limit of 25 Myr and an intervening reddening E(B-V)=0.85 (Afşar & Bond, 2007; Tylenda & Kamiński, 2012). Since its outburst, an unresolved B3V companion in the system has been detected through spectroscopic monitoring (Munari et al., 2005).

Many theoretical mechanisms have been explored to explain the origin of V Mon’s outbursts (Lawlor, 2005; Munari et al., 2005; Retter et al., 2006; Tylenda & Soker, 2006); the most likely scenario is a stellar merger between two progenitor stars in a formerly triple system (Tylenda & Soker, 2006). This scenerio also predicts x-ray emission from the spin-up of the envelope produced by such a merger (Soker & Tylenda, 2007); however, such x-ray emission has not been seen in two epochs of Chandra imagery (Antonini et al., 2010). The light from V Mon’s B3V companion is sufficient to account for the entire luminosity of the variable star measured on sky-survey photographs before its outburst (Afşar & Bond, 2007) (however, see Barsukova et al., 2010, for a discussion of the progenitor as its own B3V star).

While V Mon is a decidedly rare object, several analogs have been reported in the literature. Two emerging classes of cool explosions are: luminous red novae (LRNe) and intermediate luminosity red transients (ILRTs). Akin to V Mon, LRNe are stellar eruptions that have remained extremely cool through the outburst and include V1309 Sco (Tylenda et al., 2011) and V4332 Sgr (Martini et al., 1999). Two extragalactic events have also been noted to be LRNe: one in the bulge of M31 (Mould et al., 1990) and one in the lenticular galaxy M85 (Kulkarni et al., 2007). It has been proposed that LRNe are stellar mergers. ILRTs are similarly red but too luminous to be explained by stellar mergers: e.g., SN2008S in NGC 6946 (Prieto et al., 2008), NGC300-OT2008 (Bond et al., 2009; Thompson et al., 2009), and PTF10fqs in M99 (Kasliwal et al., 2011). Consistent with their discovery in grand spirals, it has been proposed that ILRTs represent electron-capture induced collapse in extreme Asymptotic Giant Brach Stars (Kochanek, 2011).

The local circumstellar environment of V Mon has been studied extensively since the initial outburst of the system. Based on an observed, short-lived (February – March, 2002) intrinsic polarization in the system, the outburst geometry was likely non-spherical (Wisniewski et al., 2003). In October 2002, a temporary re-emergence of an intrinsic polarization component occurred. Oriented 90 from the original component, the new polarization suggests one of two changes to the system: either a change in the optical depth of the material surrounding the star(s) or a physical shift in the illuminating source(s) (Wisniewski et al., 2003). Recent interferometric observations (Chesneau et al., 2014) have indicated a similar local circumstellar geometry as suggested by polarimetric data. V838 Mon is also surrounded by a substantially broader region of nebular material as diagnosed by the dramatic light echo illuminated by the outburst events (Bond et al., 2003).

Continued observations of V838 Mon’s local circumstellar environment have traced the dynamical evolution of the system. Optical and IR photometric monitoring has suggested that the outburst ejecta has advanced past the location of the B3V binary, completely attenuating its signal (Goranskij et al., 2008) and condensing to form new circumstellar dust (Wisniewski et al., 2008). To explain the evolution of spectroscopic and photometric properties observed over time, Lynch et al. (2004) proposed a simple, spherically symmetric model containing a central star with an expanding circumstellar shell that is cooling in a radiatively-dominated quasi-equilibrium manner; this model is consistent with spectral fits to optical and IR data from Lynch et al. (2004). More recently, Lynch et al. (2007) expanded this conceptual framework to include five components: a central star, two photospheric shells that surround the central star, and two much cooler and more distant expanding shells of gas. Validating the central tenents of these models, including the number of components required and their expansion velocities, has remained elusive due to the previously limited number of epochs (2) of IR data available.

In this paper, we discuss the continued evolution of the system in the context of the Lynch et al.  (2004, 2007) models and previously published photometric, spectroscopic, and spectro-polarimetric observations of the system. In §2, we present optical, near-IR, and mid-IR spectroscopic and mid-IR photometric observations of V Mon obtained between 2008 and 2012 at the Apache Point Observatory 3.5m, NASA IRTF 3m, and Gemini South 8m telescopes. In §3, we show a low level of H emission has returned to the system, possibly due to excitation of the gas by the B3V companion as seen through the optically thinning gas and dust ejecta or due to magnetic activity produced by an emerging dynamo effect from the proposed stellar merger. In §4, we spectrally type V Mon in both the optical (M7 supergiant) and near infrared (L3 supergiant) and discuss the discrepancy in the two identifications. In §5, we fit our 2009 observations to the Lynch et al. (2004) model for the expanding warm dust envelope and find our data is consistent with the previous two epochs of data. Finally, in §6, we discuss the implications of the results we presented in the previous sections.

## 2. Observations

Optical spectra were taken using the Astrophysical Research Consortium Echelle Spectrograph (ARCES) and the Dual Imaging Spectrograph (DIS) instruments on Apache Point Observatory’s (APO) m telescope between 2008 - 2012 (see Table 1). ARCES (Wang et al., 2003) is a high resolution, cross-dispersed visible light spectrograph that obtains spectra between 3600-10000 with a resolution of R31500. Standard bias, flat field, and ThAr lamp exposures for the echelle were also obtained on every night. These data were reduced using standard techniques in IRAF171717IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation..

DIS is a medium dispersion spectrograph with separate red and blue channels. Our DIS observations were taken using the default low-resolution blue and red gratings (B400/R300), yielding a resolution R800 and a total effective wavelength coverage of . Bias, flat field, and HeNeAr lamp exposures for DIS were obtained on every night, and nightly observations of the flux standard stars G191B2b, Feige34 or Feige110 were used to flux calibrate these data. These data were reduced using standard techniques in IRAF.

We obtained two epochs of observations of V838 Mon (Table 1) using SpeX (Rayner et al., 2003), a medium-resolution - m spectrograph located at NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF).191919http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/spex/ We used the 03 x 150 slit for our V838 Mon observations, providing R2000 spectra from 0.8-2.5 m, and also obtained observations of the A0V star HD 53205 to provide telluric correction. These data were reduced using Spextool (Vacca et al., 2003; Cushing et al., 2004).

Mid-IR low resolution spectroscopy and imaging of V838 Mon were obtained with T-ReCS (Thermal-Region Camera Spectrograph), located at the Gemini South Observatory (GSO). As summarized in Table 1, we obtained both low resolution (R100) spectroscopy in the N-band, narrow-band photometry near the N-band (Si-5: 11.7 m and Si-6: 12.3 m), and broad-band photomtry in the Q-band (Qa: 18.3 m). Standard telescope chopping and nodding was used to mitigate the effects of the thermal background of the sky in the mid IR. These data were reduced using the midir Gemini/IRAF software package.

We also present two epochs of mid-IR photometry of V838 Mon obtained with the Broadband Array Spectrograph System (BASS), mounted on NASA’s IRTF (see Table 1). BASS is an infrared array prism spectrograph (Hackwell et al., 1990) that covers the - m spectral region simultaneously at a resolving power of 25-120, depending on wavelength, and records these data on 116 back-illuminated blocked impurity band Si:As detectors. Our BASS observations were calibrated using Tau as a reference star. We note that relative calibrations for reference stars Tau, CMa, Gem, Boo, and Lyr have remained constant to about 1% with repeated tests.

## 3. Hα Evolution

The H line has proven to be an important diagnostic of the evolution of V838 Mon’s circumstellar environment, helping to trace the initial expansion of ejecta from the 2002 outbursts (Wisniewski et al., 2003) and in 2006 probing the likely interaction of this expanding ejecta with the B3V companion (Munari et al., 2007). We discuss the continued monitoring of H between October 2008 and September 2012 below.

In Figure 1, we present three optical spectra of V Mon taken with the low resolution (R ) DIS spectrograph on APO. We detect no convincing evidence of H emission at this resolution, which is consistent with conclusions drawn by Bond (2009). However, the three optical spectra of V Mon taken with the high resolution (R ) Echelle spectrograph on APO during the same epoch as our low resolution spectra clearly reveal the presence of a low level of H emission (Figure 2). This low level of emission still appears present during our fourth epoch of high resolution spectra obtained in 2012. We do not observe any significant variability in the H emission. These results are consistent with the report of low level H emission being present in 2009-epoch high resolution spectra by Tylenda et al. (2011), and extend the time period over which the system exhibits this emission.

One possible origin for this low level emission could be excitation of the expanding dust and gas envelope by the B3V companion. Bond (2009) suggests that the behavior of H from 200 to 2009, which included a brief return of the line appearing in emission followed by a return to an apparent pure absorption profile, was due to the B3V companion becoming completely engulfed by the expanding envelope. However, our high resolution spectra suggest that perhaps this envelope is not completely optically thick. Alternatively, the observed low level H emission could be caused by magnetic activity in the primary star, which is an expected byproduct of the proposed stellar merger event of 2002 (Soker & Tylenda, 2007). We discuss the plausibility of each of these scenarios in §6.

## 4. Spectral Typing

To better understand the properties of the central star, we compare both the DIS optical spectrum and SpeX IR spectrum with other cool objects. For the purposes of this discussion, we assume that the dust shell has little or no effect on the spectral features, and have corrected for a reddening of .

### 4.1. Optical Spectral Type

For a starting point in our analysis, we compare the optical spectrum of V Mon to M5–M9 dwarf (Bochanski et al., 2007) and giant (Pickles, 1998) spectroscopic templates (shown in Figure 3). We used the Hammer spectral typing software (Covey et al., 2007) to estimate the optical spectral type based on the characteristics of M dwarf optical spectra. We obtain a best fit type of M7, consistent with the Tylenda et al. (2011) type of M6.3. An examination of the specific optical features, however, indicates that the type is primarily based on the strength of the TiO bands, and most optical features are more sensitive to the V Mon’s surface gravity rather than its surface temperature.

The optical spectrum of V Mon shows strong, sharp TiO and VO features, with only weak CaH absorption at 6750Å and no sign of FeH absorption at 8600Å. The presence and strength of TiO and VO is consistent with an oxygen-rich stellar atmosphere, and the absence of FeH and CaH bands indicate a very low gravity atmosphere; those bands are weak or absent in M giants (Evans et al., 2003). The sharpness of the TiO and VO bands and the K i doublet at 7700Å compared to both the dwarf and giant templates indicates that it is likely to have an even lower surface gravity (consistent with a supergiant classification). The TiO bands at 6150Å, 6651Å, and 7053Å each absorb to zero flux, indicating the absence of the B3 component detected by Munari et al. (2005).

There is no detection of the 8183/8195Å Na i doublet, which is typically in absorption for late-M dwarfs and in emission for late-M giants (Schiavon et al., 1997). It is possible that the lack of emission is due to the lower gravity of V Mon compared to M giants. The absence of this feature is perhaps not remarkable due to the weak or absent Na i absorption both in the optical (Tylenda et al., 2011, the 5893Å doublet is very weak in the 2009 spectrum) and the near-infrared (we do not detect the Na i doublets at 1.14 and 2.21m; see Section 4.2).

### 4.2. Infrared Spectral Type

Evans et al. (2003) noted that the 0.8–2.4m spectrum of V Mon appeared to be that of an L supergiant star. There are no other objects with an L supergiant classification, so we select a range of spectra for comparison to the SpeX observations of V Mon , drawing both from late-M and L dwarf spectra and late-M giant and supergiant spectra. In Figure 4, we show the SpeX spectrum of V Mon compared to publicly available infrared spectra (Cushing et al., 2005; Rayner et al., 2009) of M8V LP 412-31 (similar to its initial optical classification), M8/9III IRAS 14303-1042 (as an example late-M giant), and M7I MY Cep (as an example of a late-M supergaint), and L3V 2MASS J00361617+1821104 (possibly similar in surface temperature) from the IRTF Spectral Library222222http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/s̃pex/IRTF_Spectral_Library/index.html. Each of these spectra share some spectral features with V Mon .

The best match for the overall shape of the V Mon spectrum is a mid-L dwarf, so we apply L dwarf classification indices to the infrared spectrum of V Mon . L dwarfs are classified not only on their spectral type/T, but also their surface gravity (which shows a dependency on age; Burrows et al., 1997). Based on the strength of its HO bands, which primarily trace effective temperature, V Mon has an infrared spectral type of L3. The Allers & Liu (2013) gravity indices (based on the strength of K i, VO, and FeH) indicate a very low gravity. The K i and FeH are in fact completely absent from the spectrum, consistent with the very low surface gravity L supergiant classification Evans et al. (2003).

Despite the L3 classification, the detailed spectral features of V Mon are not a close match to those of L3 dwarfs, as can be seen in Figure 4. The TiO bands between 0.8 and 0.9 microns, discussed in 4.1, are not typically present in L dwarf spectra. The very low surface gravity of V Mon results in the absence of FeH, K i and Na i between 1.1 and 1.3m. Another dramatic difference between L dwarfs an V Mon is the presence of AlO A-X absorption bands (first identified on V Mon by Bernstein et al., 2003) at 1.226, 1.242, 1.646, and 1.648m. These bands are consistent with oxygen-rich, low temperature environments and have been observed in a handful of AGB stars (Banerjee et al., 2012).

The best match for the detailed -band spectrum of V Mon is that of the M8/9II IRAS 14303-1042; both have TiO, VO, and HO absorption features, though the specific shapes and strengths of the features are not well matched. The -band spectrum of V Mon is dominated by HO, CO, and OH, resulting in detailed features very similar to those of the M7I MY Cep (excepting the AlO absorption bands, present only in V Mon ). The -band spectra of all three comparison stars are a good overall match to V Mon , but the CO bands appear different in both shape and strength, possibly due to the complexities of the dust shell surrounding V Mon .

The CO bands in our 2008 spectrum are qualitatively similar to those detected in the Geballe et al. (2007) low-resolution 2006 infrared spectra. Geballe et al. (2007) analyzes the CO bands in detail using a high resolution (R18000) spectra taken within a few months of the low resolution detection; this high-resolution spectra revealed distinct velocity components within the CO spectrum. The main component of the CO was at photospheric temperatures, but with a radial velocity of  km s relative to the stellar radial velocity, indicating the gas was still settling on the surface of the star. Other components of the CO absorption were associated with the more extended dust shell. In our 2008 spectrum, V Mon’s CO bands are stronger than those of all the comparison objects, which may indicate that some of the extended dust shell components still contribute to the absorption, but we do not have the velocity resolution to investigate the CO bands in more detail.

V Mon is relatively free of molecular absorption near 1.3 and 2.2m, revealing weak absorption lines. These lines appear qualitatively similar to those of the M7I MY Cep and are likely a feature of supergiant atmospheres. Using the list of infrared lines in Arcturus (Rayner et al., 2009), we tentatively identify a Mn i 1.2903, 1.2980m doublet; an Al i 1.3127, 1.3153m doublet; and a Si i 1.3181m absorption line in the 1.25–1.32m spectral region. Near 2.2m, we tentatively identify Si i at 2.2069m (not the Na i doublet seen in the dwarf spectra); a Ti i 2.2217, 2.2239, 2.2280m triplet; and a Ca i 2.2614, 2.2631, 2.2633, 2.2657m quadruplet. Both regions have additional lines of similar strength that overlapped with multiple atomic transitions so could not be positively identified at this resolution.

### 4.3. Estimating Teff From Spectra

The optical and infrared spectra of V Mon , at first glance, seem to indicate different spectral types, and therefore different surface temperatures (T). Adopting the M7 optical spectral type and extrapolating the supergiant spectral type/T relation of Levesque et al. (2005) gives a surface temperature of T K (similar to the temperature quoted by Tylenda et al., 2011). There is no supergiant temperature scale for L dwarfs, but an L3 dwarf spectral type corresponds to T K (Stephens et al., 2009). One possible way of reconciling those two temperatures is an application of a multi-layer photosphere (e.g., Lynch et al., 2007), but here we estimate based on the comparison of V Mon to other stars.

As discussed in § 4.1, the optical spectrum for V Mon matches an M7 dwarf best because the TiO bands are strongest on M7 photospheres. The fraction of TiO contained in molecules (vs.  Ti i) increases with decreasing temperature, hitting a maximum (at M dwarf atmospheric pressures) at T K (Lodders & Fegley, 2006). At temperatures cooler than T K, TiO begins to condense onto dust grains (e.g., perovskite) (Burrows & Sharp, 1999), so TiO disappears in M7 and later dwarfs. The formation of dust grains is more sensitive to atmospheric pressure than the formation of TiO, so at low surface gravity, a low temperature atmosphere will continue to have strong TiO bands at T K.

The remaining indicators of cool temperatures in optical spectra (e.g., the transition from late-M to L dwarfs) are pressure sensitive; gravity broadening of the K i doublet, the strengthening of FeH. Additionally, the infrared spectrum of V Mon appears cooler than the M7I MY Cep due to stronger TiO, VO, and HO bands. Therefore, the spectrum of V Mon may be both very cooler and very low gravity; a prototype for L supergiants in the optical. M giants are T K warmer than dwarfs of the same optical type, and if this trend continues, the surface temperature of V Mon is likely to be T K. This range of temperatures is also consistent with the formation of strong TiO bands without significant depletion of TiO onto dust.

## 5. Infrared SEDS

In this section, we fit our visible and infrared data with a two component blackbody curve. We consider the physical interpretation of this fit in context of the Lynch et al. (2004, henceforth, L04) model of V Mon’s post outburst evolution. Our goal is to constrain the evolution of the ejecta with our new epoch of data. The L04 model contains three components.

1. The central star’s photospheric emission, which is modeled as an inner blackbody source with a homogeneous outer, cooler absorbing layer. The central star is described by a radius, , and a blackbody temperature, .

2. A warm shell, which is modeled with several parameters, including an expanding radius, , and a vibrational/blackbody emission temperature, .

3. A cold, outer shell, modeled in a similar fashion as the warm, expanding shell, but with an emission temperature set to zero. Here, the quantity of greatest significance is the absorber column (resulting in an effective emissivity, , of the system).

We also considered the Lynch et al. (2007, henceforth, L07) model of V Mon’s ejecta, which contains 5 components (a central star, two photospheric shells that surround the central star, and two much cooler and more distant expanding shells of gas). This model is essentially the same as the L04 model, except the two photospheric layers are considered separately from the central star, and are each assumed to be homogeneous and characterized by a single equilibrium temperature and column amounts for the molecular species. While the added components are physically reasonable and lead to refined predictions for , the added complexity beyond this revision did not help us build additional insight from our two component blackbody fit. Therefore, our remaining discussion will focus primarily on comparisons with the L04 model.

Best fits from L04 and L07 can be found in Table 2. We note that the generally accepted values for the velocity of the expanding cloud in 2003 were within 100-400 km s (see L04 and references therein). We assume the velocity of the expanding cloud is km s and the distance to V Mon is kpc (Sparks et al., 2008) to generate model predictions. In January 2009, L04 predicts: AU (no evolution from 2005); K (no evolution from 2005); AU (time elapse 6 year 10.5 months, expansion rate 33.75 AU/yr); and K (temperature of cloud in 2003 0.38).

We fit our 2009 SED data, consisting of both de-reddened optical and infrared data, with a 2 component blackbody curve (Figure 5). Our simultaneous fit yielded for the primary star T2370 K and R AU and T285 K, R263 AU, and veiling= for the warm expanding dust envelope. We note, the T identified in section §4 using spectral analysis (T K) falls within the 3 errors on our best fit for the temperature of the primary, K.

Our results are consistent with the predictions from the L04 model. We find only a slightly larger radius for the expanding dust shell ( 263 10 AU) than is predicted ( 230.5 AU) using an expansion rate of km s. Moreover, the blackbody temperature we determine for this shell ( 285 2 K) is consistent with that predicted from the L04 model.

## 6. Discussion & Conclusions

In this section, we discuss and present our conclusions regarding V Mon’s spectral type, expanding outburst ejecta, and ongoing H emission. We also comment on the lack of new dust formation (relative to 2008 observations) and place this in the context of the evolution of the system as a whole.

In §4, we concluded that the IR spectral slope of V Mon is best matched to an L3 supergiant. While the optical data is best matched by a spectral classification of M7 (as matched to a dwarf template), this classification does not take into account the effects of low gravity on the persistence of various spectral features. Significantly, the temperatures at which TiO can remain coherent in supergiant photospheres could be as high as 2000–2200 K. Given the complete lack of L supergiant data to type against within the optical regime, we conclude that V Mon could plausibly be catagorized as a L supergiant in both the IR and optical regimes. In this regard, we speculate that V Mon could be a prototype for what an L supergiant optical spectra should look like.

In §5, we used our 2009 optical to mid-IR observations as a third epoch of data to test the Lynch et al. (2004) model of the expanding ejecta envelope. Our data indicate the dust shell has continued to cool at a similar rate as suggested by the Lynch et al. (2004) model. If the shell was ejected at a velocity of , the 2009 IR data is consistent with a 2852 K shell of material which has expanded to a radius of 26310 AU and is attenuated by by an outer cooler shell. In this best fit to the model, the radius of the L3 primary is described by AU and a K. We note, the T identified in section §4 using spectral analysis (T K) falls within the 3 errors on our best fit for the temperature of the primary, K.

These results are consistent with the recent IR interferometric analysis by Chesneau et al. (2014). Using the Very Large Telescope Interferometer between October 2011 and February 2012, and adopting a distance to V Mon of kpc, Chesneau et al. (2014) deduce that there is a dust shell distributed from about 130 to 300 AU around V Mon. They note the dust is distributed in a flattened structure which could be interpreted as a relic of the genesis event or could be influenced by the embedded B3V companion. They also note that as of 2014, the radius of V Mon’s photosphere has decreased by about 40% from the radius determined after the outbursting events to AU. We note that the radius of the primary that we determined ( AU) is within errorbars of the radius determined by Chesneau et al. (2014).

We consider here whether the dust is newly formed material or persisting matter that has expanded to a larger spatial distribution. Wisniewski et al. (2008) previously found substantial dust production in the 20062007 epoch, which was reflected in an IR excess at the 10–80m wavelength range. We repeat their analysis on our 20082009 IR photometry. In Figure 6, we plot our new results together with the data presented in Wisniewski et al. (2008). As evident, our 20082009 IR photometry shows no appreciable change from the 20062007 epoch. We conclude there has been no substantive change in the dust production or composition.

In §3, we showed the level of H activity has declined since the line’s brief return to significant emission in 2006. While H emission is not distinguishable in low resolution spectra obtained during 2008-2009, all high-resolution (R ) spectra obtained between 2008-2012 do show the ongoing presence of a small amount of H emission. We suggest two possible origins for the observed weak H emission. The emission could originate from magnetic activity in the primary star, which is an expected phenomenon (Soker & Tylenda, 2007) if the 2002 outburst was caused by a stellar merger event (Tylenda & Soker, 2006). Antonini et al. (2010) found highly variable X-ray emission associated with V Mon: in 2008, strong X-ray emission was detected with XMM Newton, but in 2009 and 2010 no such emission was found using Chandra. From this, Antonini et al. (2010) suggest that the magnetic activity itself might be highly variable. We do not detect significant H variability in our high resolution spectra that supports the purported variable magnetic activity; however, we cannot rule out that this is due to the sparse, non-contemporaneous sampling of the optical and X-ray data. Alternatively, the emission may simply be caused by the continued excitation of HI in the expanding shell of gas and dust by the B3V binary companion, which would indicate that this shell is not completely optically thick.

To ultimately disentangle which scenario is generating the H emission, a simultaneous X-ray and observational campaign is needed. As Antonini et al. (2010) note, it is implausible to generate high X-ray luminosities from the simple interactions of infalling matter with the matter above the stellar photosphere unless extreme accretion rates and infall velocities are involved. Thus catching V Mon in the act of producing strong X-ray emission would be a strong indicator that the stellar merger is the ultimate source of any ongoing H activity. Even if no X-ray emission is detected, it is certainly worthwhile to continue to monitor the H activity and search for the reappearance of the B3V companion. Further evolution (or lack thereof) will put strong contraints on both the material surrounding V Mon and the genesis event that fueled the outbursts.

## 7. Acknowledgments

This work is supported at The Aerospace Corporation by the Independent Research and Development program. SRL acknowledges support from the Michigan Society of Fellows. MMK acknowledges generous support from the Hubble Fellowship and Carnegie-Princeton Fellowship.

## References

• Afşar & Bond (2007) Afşar, M., & Bond, H. E. 2007, AJ, 133, 387
• Allers & Liu (2013) Allers, K. N., & Liu, M. C. 2013, ApJ, 772, 79
• Antonini et al. (2010) Antonini, F., Montez, R., Jr., Kastner, J. H., Bond, H. E., Soker, N., Tylenda, R., Starrfield, S., & Behar, E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 795
• Banerjee et al. (2012) Banerjee, D. P. K., Varricatt, W. P., Mathew, B., Launila, O., & Ashok, N. M. 2012, ApJ, 753, L20
• Barsukova et al. (2010) Barsukova, E. A., Goranskij, V. P., Metlova, N. V., Kroll, P., & Valeev, A. F. 2010, in Progenitors and Environments of Stellar Explosions
• Bernstein et al. (2003) Bernstein, L. S., Rudy, R. J., Lynch, D. K., Dimpfl, W. L., Mazuk, S., Venturini, C. C., Puetter, R. C., & Perry, R. B. 2003, IAU Circ., 8082, 2
• Bochanski et al. (2007) Bochanski, J. J., West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., & Covey, K. R. 2007, AJ, 133, 531
• Bond (2009) Bond, H. E. 2009, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 214, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 430.06
• Bond et al. (2009) Bond, H. E., Bedin, L. R., Bonanos, A. Z., Humphreys, R. M., Monard, L. A. G. B., Prieto, J. L., & Walter, F. M. 2009, ApJ, 695, L154
• Bond et al. (2003) Bond, H. E., et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 405
• Brown et al. (2002) Brown, N. J., Waagen, E. O., Scovil, C., Nelson, P., Oksanen, A., Solonen, J., & Price, A. 2002, IAU Circ., 7785, 1
• Burrows et al. (1997) Burrows, A., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856
• Burrows & Sharp (1999) Burrows, A., & Sharp, C. M. 1999, ApJ, 512, 843
• Chesneau et al. (2014) Chesneau, O., et al. submitted 2014, A&A
• Covey et al. (2007) Covey, K. R., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 2398
• Cushing et al. (2005) Cushing, M. C., Rayner, J. T., & Vacca, W. D. 2005, ApJ, 623, 1115
• Cushing et al. (2004) Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362
• Evans et al. (2003) Evans, A., Geballe, T. R., Rushton, M. T., Smalley, B., van Loon, J. T., Eyres, S. P. S., & Tyne, V. H. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1054
• Geballe et al. (2007) Geballe, T. R., Rushton, M. T., Eyres, S. P. S., Evans, A., van Loon, J. T., & Smalley, B. 2007, A&A, 467, 269
• Goranskii et al. (2002) Goranskii, V. P., Kusakin, A. V., Metlova, N. V., Shugarov, S. Y., Barsukova, E. A., & Borisov, N. V. 2002, Astronomy Letters, 28, 691
• Goranskij et al. (2008) Goranskij, V., Zharova, A., Barsukova, E., Fabrika, S., & Valeev, A. 2008, ArXiv e-prints
• Hackwell et al. (1990) Hackwell, J. A., Warren, D. W., Chatelain, M. A., Dotan, Y., & Li, P. H. 1990, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 1235, Instrumentation in Astronomy VII, ed. D. L. Crawford, 171
• Kasliwal et al. (2011) Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 134
• Kochanek (2011) Kochanek, C. S. 2011, ApJ, 741, 37
• Kulkarni et al. (2007) Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2007, Nature, 447, 458
• Lawlor (2005) Lawlor, T. M. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 695
• Levesque et al. (2005) Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., Plez, B., Josselin, E., Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2005, ApJ, 628, 973
• Lodders & Fegley (2006) Lodders, K., & Fegley, B., Jr. 2006, Chemistry of Low Mass Substellar Objects, ed. J. W. Mason (Springer Verlag), 1
• Lynch et al. (2007) Lynch, D. K., et al. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 363, The Nature of V838 Mon and its Light Echo, ed. R. L. M. Corradi & U. Munari, 39
• Lynch et al. (2004) Lynch, D. K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 607, 460
• Martini et al. (1999) Martini, P., Wagner, R. M., Tomaney, A., Rich, R. M., della Valle, M., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1999, AJ, 118, 1034
• Mould et al. (1990) Mould, J., et al. 1990, ApJ, 353, L35
• Munari et al. (2005) Munari, U., et al. 2005, A&A, 434, 1107
• Munari et al. (2007) Munari, U., Navasardyan, H., & Villanova, S. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 363, The Nature of V838 Mon and its Light Echo, ed. R. L. M. Corradi & U. Munari, 13
• Pickles (1998) Pickles, A. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 863
• Prieto et al. (2008) Prieto, J. L., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, L9
• Rayner et al. (2009) Rayner, J. T., Cushing, M. C., & Vacca, W. D. 2009, ApJS, 185, 289
• Rayner et al. (2003) Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W., Onaka, P. M., Denault, A. J., Stahlberger, W. E., Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Wang, S. 2003, PASP, 115, 362
• Retter et al. (2006) Retter, A., Zhang, B., Siess, L., & Levinson, A. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1573
• Rushton et al. (2005) Rushton, M. T., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1281
• Schiavon et al. (1997) Schiavon, R. P., Barbuy, B., Rossi, S. C. F., & Milone, A. 1997, ApJ, 479, 902
• Soker & Tylenda (2007) Soker, N., & Tylenda, R. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 909
• Sparks et al. (2008) Sparks, W. B., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 605
• Stephens et al. (2009) Stephens, D. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 154
• Thompson et al. (2009) Thompson, T. A., Prieto, J. L., Stanek, K. Z., Kistler, M. D., Beacom, J. F., & Kochanek, C. S. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1364
• Tylenda & Kamiński (2012) Tylenda, R., & Kamiński, T. 2012, A&A, 548, A23
• Tylenda et al. (2011) Tylenda, R., Kamiński, T., Schmidt, M., Kurtev, R., & Tomov, T. 2011, A&A, 532, A138
• Tylenda & Soker (2006) Tylenda, R., & Soker, N. 2006, A&A, 451, 223
• Vacca et al. (2003) Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP, 115, 389
• Wang et al. (2003) Wang, S.-i., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood, 1145
• Wisniewski et al. (2003) Wisniewski, J. P., Bjorkman, K. S., & Magalhães, A. M. 2003, ApJ, 598, L43
• Wisniewski et al. (2008) Wisniewski, J. P., Clampin, M., Bjorkman, K. S., & Barry, R. K. 2008, ApJ, 683, L171
• Wisniewski et al. (2003) Wisniewski, J. P., Morrison, N. D., Bjorkman, K. S., Miroshnichenko, A. S., Gault, A. C., Hoffman, J. L., Meade, M. R., & Nett, J. M. 2003, ApJ, 588, 486
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
• Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
• Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
• Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters