Super Spirals

Superluminous Spiral Galaxies

Patrick M. Ogle, Lauranne Lanz, Cyril Nader, George Helou IPAC, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125 University of California, Los Angeles

We report the discovery of spiral galaxies that are as optically luminous as elliptical brightest cluster galaxies, with -band monochromatic luminosity ( erg s). These super spiral galaxies are also giant and massive, with diameter kpc and stellar mass . We find 53 super spirals out of a complete sample of 1616 SDSS galaxies with redshift and . The closest example is found at . We use existing photometry to estimate their stellar masses and star formation rates (SFRs). The SDSS and WISE colors are consistent with normal star-forming spirals on the blue sequence. However, the extreme masses and rapid SFRs of yr place super spirals in a sparsely populated region of parameter space, above the star-forming main sequence of disk galaxies. Super spirals occupy a diverse range of environments, from isolation to cluster centers. We find four super spiral galaxy systems that are late-stage major mergers–a possible clue to their formation. We suggest that super spirals are a remnant population of unquenched, massive disk galaxies. They may eventually become massive lenticular galaxies after they are cut off from their gas supply and their disks fade.

1. Introduction

The most massive galaxies in the universe are thought to form from the largest density peaks in the primordial matter distribution. Galaxy mergers change the initial galaxy mass function, forming more massive galaxies by combining less massive ones. The result is the galaxy mass distribution we see in the local universe, empirically described by the Schechter (1976) luminosity function, together with a morphology-dependent mass-to-light ratio. The luminosity function also depends upon the star formation history of galaxies, regulated by gas content, gas accretion, stellar feedback, and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback. Galaxy mergers play an important role here too, since tidal torques in merging systems force gas into the galaxy centers, leading to starburst activity that grows the stellar bulge and AGN activity that grows the supermassive black hole (Toomre & Toomre, 1972; Barnes & Hernquist, 1991; Hopkins et al., 2009).

Galaxies segregate into two major classes based on color and morphology (Strateva et al., 2001; Lintott et al., 2008). Blue, star-forming disks (late-type galaxies, LTGs) lie in one region of color-space called the blue-sequence. Red-and-dead spheroids (early-type galaxies, ETGs) lie in a different region of color space called the red sequence. LTGs demonstrate a correlation between star formation rate (SFR) and stellar mass () called the star-forming main sequence (SFMS: Brinchmann et al., 2004; Elbaz et al., 2007; Wuyts et al., 2011). The SFMS may be a consequence of an equilibrium between inflowing gas and star-formation driven outflows, with the specific star formation rate (SSFR) regulated by the halo mass growth rate (Lilly et al., 2013). Most ETGs on the other hand have much lower SFRs because they lack the cold gas needed to sustain star formation.

It appears that there is a limit to the mass of star-forming disk galaxies of roughly , with the most massive disk galaxies transitioning away from the main sequence as their SSFR declines. This decline appears to be a gradual process, occurring over a period longer than 1 Gyr after the gas supply to the galaxy disk has been interrupted (Schawinski et al., 2014). Rapid quenching does not appear to occur for most galaxies that remain disk galaxies, contrary to early attempts to explain the apparently bimodal distribution of galaxy colors.

A number of mechanisms have been suggested to explain why the gas supply is interrupted for the most massive disk galaxies. Major galaxy mergers may disrupt merging disk galaxies and transform them rapidly into elliptical galaxies (Baldry et al., 2004), though this does not explain the transformation of galaxies that remain disks. The accretion of cold gas onto a galaxy may be stopped when the galaxy halo becomes massive enough that accretion shocks develop, interrupting the cold streams of gas needed to replenish the disk (Dekel & Birnboim, 2006). Increasing AGN feedback from a growing supermassive black hole may shock or eject gas from the galaxy disk, reducing its capacity to form stars (Hopkins et al., 2006; Ogle, Lanz, & Appleton, 2014). Ram-pressure stripping of the interstellar medium (ISM) by the intercluster medium (ICM) of a galaxy cluster can also remove cold gas (Sivanandam, Rieke, & Rieke, 2014).

Studying the most massive spiral galaxies can give us clues as to which of the above evolutionary processes are primarily responsible for converting star-forming disk galaxies into red-and-dead lenticulars or ellipticals. The existence of rapidly star-forming, massive spirals with indicates that disk galaxies can postpone this fate under special circumstances. We present here the most optically luminous and biggest spiral galaxies at redshift , found by mining the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). We assume a cosmology with , , and for computing all linear sizes and luminosities.

2. Sample

This project is an offshoot of our work to determine the completeness of NED and explore its potential for systematic studies of galaxy populations (Ogle, P. et al., in preparation). NED provides a unique fusion of multi-wavelength photometry from Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX), Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and the 2-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS), among others, which we augment by Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) photometry, that allows us to estimate stellar masses and SFRs. We compared the redshift distribution of galaxies in NED at to a model redshift distribution for the universe derived using a redshift-independent luminosity function, in order to estimate the spectroscopic completeness of NED. We used the Schechter (1976) luminosity function fits of Blanton et al. (2003), which are based on 150,000 SDSS galaxies as our benchmark. We adopt their characteristic absolute magnitude value of ( erg s at 6200) for the SDSS -band luminosity function. The redshift limit was made large enough to capture the rarest, most luminous galaxies, but not so large as to require consideration of redshift evolution in the luminosity function.

2.1. SDSS r-band Selection of the most Optically Luminous Galaxies

SDSS is the largest source of spectroscopic redshifts, with a spectroscopic selection limit of (Strauss et al. 2002). We find that NED is complete over the SDSS footprint out to for galaxies with , the most optically luminous and massive galaxies in the low-redshift universe. Our sample is chosen from the 797,729 galaxies (typeG) in NED with spectroscopic redshifts , in the SDSS footprint, and detected in SDSS band. We apply Galactic extinction corrections (tabulated by NED) and K-corrections to the -band magnitudes prior to making our sample selection. We find 1616 galaxies with redshift and luminosity , which constitute our Ogle et al. Galaxy Catalog (OGC). The most luminous galaxy in the OGC is a elliptical brightest cluster galaxy (BCG).

2.2. UV Selection Method for Super Spiral Galaxies

We make a further selection for UV emission because we are interested in finding the most massive, actively star-forming disk galaxies. We recently matched and integrated the GALEX All-Sky Survey Catalog (GASC) and GALEX Medium Sky Survey Catalog (GMSC) with NED, using an automated, statistical algorithm (Ogle et al., 2015). We inspected the SDSS images of all 196 galaxies from the OGC that are detected in the GALEX NUV band (the OGC-UV subsample). Of these, we find 46 NUV-detected, galaxies with spiral morphology (Table 1). The remaining NUV sources include 118 ellipticals, 11 galaxies with E+A spectra, 2 quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) with extended emission, and 19 galaxies with erroneous redshifts or magnitudes. The most luminous elliptical galaxy in OGC-UV is a BCG, while the most luminous spiral galaxy has .

2.3. Morphological Selection Method for Super Spiral Galaxies

We inspected the 310 brightest galaxies of the full OGC sample, those with , to see if we are missing any spirals with UV selection. Of these, we classified 11 super spirals, 253 ellipticals, 38 galaxies with erroneous redshifts or magnitudes, 6 lenticulars, 1 irregular, and 1 E+A galaxy. This inventory includes 7 additional super spirals (Table 1) that are not in the OGC-UV sample. Of these, 4 have no GALEX sources nearby, and 3 others have nearby GALEX sources that should be matched in NED, but are not, possibly because of confusion. This shows that our NUV selection, while relatively efficient (47/196) compared to morphological selection (11/310), leads to an incomplete sample, with only 4/11 super spirals recovered in this luminosity range. Part of the incompleteness (3/11) is owing to incomplete matching of GALEX with NED, while the rest (4/11) may be attributed to the GALEX detection limit or coverage.

3. Photometry

We conduct our investigation of super spirals primarily with photometry compiled by NED. We use SDSS DR6 , , , , photometry measured with the CModel method, which combines exponential plus deVaucouleurs model fitting. GALEX FUV and NUV photometry is taken from the GASC and GMSC, measured within a Kron elliptical aperture. We use 2MASS , , total magnitudes from the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (2MASX). NED objects are matched to AllWISE sources using the Gator tool in the Infrared Science Archive (IRSA). We use AllWISE 4.6 and 12 m photometry within the largest available fixed-radius aperture of , which is well-matched to the largest galaxy in our sample, with semimajor axis .

4. Basic Properties of Super Spirals

Figure 1.— (a) SDSS and WISE colors of super spirals (circles) compared to other SDSS galaxies classified as LTG or ETG by Lintott et al. (2008). The infrared transition zone (IRTZ) is the mid-IR equivalent of the optical green valley (Alatalo et al., 2014). (b) Star formation rates and stellar masses of super spirals compared to the SDSS-WISE sample of Chang et al. (2015). The dashed line indicates the star-forming main sequence at (Elbaz et al., 2007). Galaxies above this line also have formation times that are generally less than the age of the universe. Larger diamond symbols are for SDSS J094700.08+254045.7 (SS 16) and 2MASX J13275756+334529 (SS 05), with detailed SED analysis presented in the Appendix.
Figure 2.— Super spirals range in diameter from 57 to 134 kpc. The dashed and dotted-dashed lines indicate deprojected SFR surface densities of and yr kpc, respectively.
Figure 3.— The largest super spiral galaxy, with and an isophotal diameter of 134 kpc, 2MASX J16394598+4609058 (SS 03, ). The SDSS image is 50.7 (197 kpc) on each side.

4.1. Optical and Mid-IR colors

The SDSS and WISE colors of super spirals lie along the blue sequence, similarly to less luminous star-forming disk galaxies (Figure 1(a)). The SDSS comparison sample is adopted from Alatalo et al. (2014), who show that LTGs and ETGs classified by Galaxy Zoo (GZ) (Lintott et al., 2008) are well-separated in WISE [4.6][12] vs. SDSS color space. The WISE [4.6][12] color ranges from 2.0 to 4.2, typical of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and warm dust emission from gas-rich, actively star-forming galaxies. The color ranges from 1.4 to 4.4, indicating star-forming disks with a range of SSFR or dust extinction. We estimate differential K-corrections of mag in the redshift range , by convolving several spectral energy distribution (SED) models (e.g., those in the Appendix) with the SDSS filter curves. These corrections are not large enough to explain the additional scatter in the observed colors of super spirals.

There is a shift in the locus of super spiral colors compared to less-massive blue sequence galaxies. Super spirals tend to have redder and bluer [4.6][12] colors compared to the SDSS distribution. This could in principle indicate either lower SSFR or increased extinction. However, the high SSFR of our sample (Figure 1(b)) runs contrary to the first explanation. Six super spirals have , a value not attained by less luminous SDSS LTGs. The two reddest galaxies (SS 53 and SS 09) may be misclassified peculiar elliptical galaxies with prominent shells. CGCG 122-067 (SS 50) may be redder because of its double bulge. The other 4 are clearly spirals, and require further investigation and custom photometry to determine the cause of their unusually red colors.

4.2. Stellar Mass and Star Formation Rate

Figure 4.— SDSS images of super spirals, 40 on a side. Examples with peculiar morphology: (1) multi-arm spiral, (8) asymmetric 2-arm spiral, (10) QSO host with tidal arm, (21) ring galaxy, (23) possible tidal arm, (33) asymmetric disk, (34) possible secondary bulge, (53) partial arms or shells.

We estimate stellar mass from 2MASS luminosity together with an SDSS color-dependent mass-to-light ratio estimated using the prescription of Bell et al. (2003), giving . We apply a small correction to the stellar masses to convert to a Chabrier initial mass function (IMF). This yields stellar masses that are consistent with more sophisticated SED template fitting (Appendix). We find stellar masses in the range .

We estimate the SFR from the WISE 12 m luminosity using the prescription of Chang et al. (2015), which was established by SED-fitting more than 630,000 SDSS galaxies with magphys (da Cunha, Charlot, & Elbaz, 2008). While accurate for star-forming galaxies, this method may overestimate the star-formation rate for early type galaxies where dust may be heated by other sources not directly related to star formation, or in the presence of a luminous AGN. We further validate our WISE single-band SFRs against magphys SED-fitting for two representative super spirals (Appendix). The WISE 12 m monochromatic luminosities of super spirals range from erg s (), corresponding to SFRs of yr.

We compare our sample to the SDSS-WISE sample of Chang et al. (2015), who estimated SFR and with magphys. We find that most super spirals lie well above an extrapolation of the star-forming main sequence to higher mass (Figure 1(b)). This is a region of the SFR vs. mass diagram that is very sparsely populated. The vast majority of SDSS disk galaxies in this mass range have significantly lower SFR and SSFR.

Our -band luminosity plus NUV detection criteria tend to select galaxies with high global star formation rates. However, the SDSS spectra reveal a relatively old bulge stellar population for most super spirals. We do find an indication of starburst activity in the SDSS bulge spectra of 3 super spirals (SS 05–see Appendix, SS 15, and SS 44) with strong young stellar population contributions and high-equivalent width H emission. These three galaxies also have relatively blue SDSS colors and red WISE [4.6][12] colors, both indicative of a high global SSFR.

Figure 5.— Distributions of super spiral and Galaxy Zoo spiral disk-bulge decomposition parameters, as measured by Simard et al. (2011): (a) Bulge to total () -band luminosity fraction, (b) disk inclination distribution compared to the expectation for randomly oriented disks (black curve), (c) bulge ellipticity, and (d) disk exponential scale length.

4.3. Active Galactic Nuclei

The super spiral galaxies in our sample contain 3 Seyfert 1 nuclei and 2 QSOs with broad Balmer lines and strong [O iii] in their SDSS spectra (Table 1). There is also 1 Seyfert 2 nucleus with strong [O iii] but narrow Balmer lines. There is likely a dominant contribution from the QSO to the IR luminosity of 2MASX J15430777+1937522 (SS 10), which has the greatest WISE 12 m luminosity of our sample ( erg s or ). The two QSOs are also detected at X-ray wavelengths by ROSAT. One additional galaxy (2MASX J10095635+2611324 SS 45) is detected in X-rays, but has no obvious signature of an AGN in its SDSS nuclear spectrum. There is so far no indication of any extended X-ray emission associated with super spirals, though none have been specifically targeted for this. It will be important to make deep X-ray observations of super spirals to quantify any X-ray halo emission in comparison to giant elliptical galaxies. Only two super spirals are detected by the NVSS radio survey (2MASX J14472834+5908314 SS 47 and CGCG 122-067 SS 50), but the resolution is insufficient to distinguish between radio emission from star formation activity or from a radio jet. The presence of luminous AGNs in 11% of super spirals indicates that they are continuing to grow their supermassive black holes. It is imperative to measure the distribution of bulge and supermassive black hole masses in our super spiral sample to see if they follow the same relation as lower-mass spiral bulges.

4.4. Size, SFR Surface Density, and Morphology

The sizes of super spirals range from 57 to 134 kpc, with a median size of 72 kpc, using the SDSS DR6 -band isophotal diameter at 25.0 mag arcsec (Table 1 and Figure 2). Their deprojected SFR surface densities range from to yr kpc. A plot of SFR vs. diameter shows considerable scatter (Figure 2). However, the five most rapidly star-forming galaxies, with , all have diameters kpc. The most MIR-luminous super spiral (SDSS J094700.08+254045.7, see Appendix), also has the largest deprojected SFR surface density. The largest super spiral, 2MASX J16394598+4609058 (SS 03, Figure 3), has a diameter of 134 kpc and a relatively low SFR surface density of yr kpc.

Super spirals display a range of morphologies, from flocculent to grand-design spiral patterns (Figure 4). At least 9 super spirals have prominent stellar bars visible in the SDSS images (Table 1: Notes). There are morphological peculiarities in several cases, including one-arm spirals, multi-arm spirals, rings, and asymmetric spiral structure (Figure 4 and Table 1). These types of features may indicate past or ongoing galaxy mergers or collisions.

4.5. Bulge-disk Decomposition

We make use of the bulge-disk decompositions of Simard et al. (2011) to quantify the relative contributions of the bulge and disk to the luminosity of super spirals (Table 2). The galaxy and band SDSS images are jointly fit by a de Vaucouleurs profile for the bulge (Sersic index ), plus an exponential disk. We compare super spirals to a representative subsample of 4686 spiral galaxies with classified by Galaxy Zoo (GZ, Figure 5), with bulge-disk decompositions also by Simard et al. (2011). We find a much narrower distribution of -band bulge to total luminosity () for super spirals, with a median value of , and a deficit of values . A Kolmogorov-Smirnoff (K-S) test shows that the distributions differ significantly, with a probability of only 0.0027 that super spirals are drawn from the same population as GZ spirals. The lack of super spirals with may be consistent with a past history of significant merger activity. The bulge ellipticity distribution of super spirals is not significantly different from that of GZ spirals (Figure 5(c)). We note that since the profile fits do not include a bar component, the ellipticities may be augmented by the presence of a bar or double bulge.

The disk inclination distribution of super spirals also differs significantly from that of GZ spirals, and from the expected dependence (Figure 5(b)). A K-S test gives a probability of that super spirals and GZ spirals are drawn from the same inclination distribution. Only 5 (9%) of super spirals have inclinations of , compared to the expectation of 50% for randomly oriented disks. This indicates that we are missing roughly 45% of the super spirals in our luminosity range, possibly because of internal extinction at the NUV selection wavelength. The GZ spiral inclination distribution also differs from the expectation for randomly oriented disks, with an excess at inclinations that may reveal a bias for GZ to classify edge on disks as spirals or to misclassify edge-on lenticulars as spirals.

The median disk exponential scale length of super spirals is 12.2 kpc, 2.3 times as large as the 5.3 kpc median for GZ spirals, confirming the giant disk sizes of super spirals (Figure 5d). A K-S test gives a probability of that super spirals and GZ spirals are drawn from the same size distribution. The galaxy smoothness parameter (Simard et al., 2009), which quantifies the fractional residuals to the model fit inside two half-light radii, is in r band. The and parameters of bulge-disk decompositions have been used by others to quantitatively select early-type galaxies, with and as criteria (Simard et al., 2009). Several super spirals in our sample meet these criteria, but we are nevertheless confident of the detection of a significant spiral disk in most of these cases.

5. Galaxy Merger Candidates

Figure 6.— SDSS images of super spiral merger candidates. (a) Possible collision in progress of two spirals. (b) Possible collision or merger of two spirals, also a brightest cluster galaxy (see also Figure 7). (c) High-surface brightness disk with possible double AGN, with faint outer arms. The nucleus at the center is classified as an SDSS QSO. The second bright point source and possible AGN, near the edge of the disk, has a similar color to the primary AGN. (d) Possible late-stage major merger with two stellar bulges, with a striking grand spiral design surrounding both nuclei. Three other point sources may mark additional merging components or nuclei, reminiscent of nest galaxies commonly found at the centers of galaxy clusters. Each SDSS image is 48 on a side.
Figure 7.— Super spiral merger candidate 2MASXJ16014061+2718161 (SS 37) is the brightest cluster galaxy of galaxy cluster GMBCG J240.41924+27.30444. The SDSS image is (572 kpc) on each side.
Figure 8.— Super spiral 2MASX J11535621+4923562 (SS 17: , kpc) appears to be the brightest member of a previously unidentified galaxy cluster (OGC 0586 CLUSTER). Compare to the less-luminous cluster spiral galaxy SDSS J115407.96+492200.8 (, kpc) in the lower left corner. The SDSS image is (579 kpc) on each side.

We find four super spiral merger candidates with apparent double stellar bulges or double nuclei (Figure 6). The SDSS spectra only cover the dominant or central bulge or nucleus of each system. Spectroscopy of the secondary bulges or nuclei will be necessary to confirm or rule out these merger candidates as true physical pairs or multiples.

The merger candidate 2MASX J08542169+0449308 (SS 22) appears to be a nearly equal mass major spiral pre-merger. The arms of both spirals are wound in the same direction, and the disks appear to be overlapping in the plane of the sky. The stretched out spiral arms of both spiral galaxy components, together with an apparent tidal arm at PA (measured counterclockwise from North) suggest an ongoing tidal interaction.

The merger candidate 2MASX J16014061+2718161 (SS 37) is a BCG, surrounded by several other disk galaxy companions (Figures 6 and 7). The host cluster is identified as GMBCG J240.41924+27.30444, with a photometric redshift of 0.193 (Table 3). There are clear distortions to the spiral structures of both spiral galaxy components that appear to be involved in this merger.

The merger candidate 2MASX J09334777+2114362 (SS 46) appears to be a double AGN system. The primary, central nucleus is identified as an SDSS QSO. The secondary nucleus has similar flux and color to the primary nucleus, but it does not have an SDSS spectrum to confirm that it is a true physical double AGN. The galaxy disk has high surface brightness, suggestive of starburst activity. Faint outer spiral arms are also suggestive of a recent galaxy interaction.

The merger candidate and BCG CGCG 122-067 (SS 50) appears to be a late stage :1 major merger. The double bulge is surrounded by a common inner disk. Two giant spiral arms emerge from this central disk, one from each bulge, making a complete circuit around the disk. A large gap is seen between the arms at PA. There are three other possible merging nuclei, including a bright green point source at PA, that raise the possibility that this is a five-component multiple merger system. Such multiple mergers are reminiscent of the elliptical nest galaxies that are sometimes found at the centers of galaxy clusters.

6. Environment

We checked NED for known galaxy clusters and groups within of each super spiral (Table 3). Seven of the super spirals are candidate BCGs, within of a galaxy cluster. Two are candidate brightest group galaxies (BGGs), within of a compact galaxy group. Most of the clusters only have photometric redshifts and have yet to be verified spectroscopically. However, the photometric redshifts are all within of the super spiral spectroscopic redshift, which suggests a true physical association. The two associations of super spirals with compact groups are only based on their small angular separation, with no independent redshift available for the groups.

We used NED’s Environment Tool to further explore the environments of the super spiral BCG and BGG candidates. This tool performs a redshift-constrained cone search for galaxies and galaxy clusters within a sphere of comoving radius 10 Mpc. Because of the high redshifts of the super spirals, only the most luminous galaxies in their neighborhoods will tend to have measured spectroscopic redshifts in NED. We tabulate the number of galaxies (N1) with spectroscopic redshifts that are within 1 Mpc and 500 km s, and the number (N10) within 10 projected Mpc and 5000 km s. The MSPM 05544 galaxy cluster, which appears to host the super spiral CGCG 122-067 (SS 50) has the largest number of cluster members with spectroscopic redshifts in NED (302), while the SDSSCGB 59704 galaxy group has the smallest number (2). These numbers should be taken as lower limits to the cluster membership, depending primarily on the SDSS spectroscopic selection limit and redshift.

There are likely more clusters to be discovered in the vicinity of super spirals. For example, a clear overdensity of galaxies is seen to the SE of 2MASX J11535621+4923562 (SS 17, Figure 8). We verify a concentration of 69 galaxies within 10 Mpc and 5000 km s (Table 3: OGC 0586 CLUSTER), using NED’s Environment tool. We estimate the mean redshift of OGC 0586 CLUSTER to be , from 12 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts that are within 5 projected Mpc of SS 17.

7. Discussion

While super spirals have similar structure to less luminous spiral galaxies, they are impressive in the vastness of their scale. A sense of how truly enormous these galaxies are can be gained by comparison to other galaxies in the same cluster (Figure 8: OGC 0586 CLUSTER). The 2MASX J115356214923562 (SS 17) super spiral at , with a luminosity of and a diameter of 90 kpc, can be compared to a more common, less luminous spiral galaxy which has and a diameter of 39 kpc (), at about the same redshift ().

7.1. Analogs

It is natural to ask whether any analogs to super spirals have been found at lower redshift. One well-known example of a giant spiral galaxy is Malin 1 (), initially suggested to be a proto-disk galaxy because of its massive H i disk (Bothun et al., 1987). While Malin 1 does have one of the largest stellar disks known, with an exponential scale length of 70 kpc, its global -band luminosity () is not nearly great enough to make it into the OGC catalog. Its disk has very low surface brightness and is not readily visible in SDSS images. As further points of comparison, we estimate a global stellar mass of and global SFR of yr, which are both much lower than the range spanned by super spirals.

Other giant spiral galaxies are found in the local universe, though they also have considerably lower luminosities than the super spirals in our sample. Romanishin (1983) find 107 spiral galaxies in the Uppsala General Catalog of Galaxies (UGC) at , with cosmology-corrected -band isophotal diameters (at mag arcsec) of kpc, similar to super spirals. The 39 giant UGC spirals with SDSS photometry in NED have -band luminosities of , stellar masses of to yr, and SFRs of yr. Because of their considerably lower stellar masses, they cannot be faded super spirals, but could be useful analogs for understanding giant disks. One of the largest giant spiral galaxies, UGC 2885 has a rotational velocity of 280 km s at a radius of 60 kpc, and has undergone fewer than 10 rotations at its outer edge in the age of the universe (Rubin, Ford, & Thonnard, 1980).

Super spirals may also be related to the cold sub-mm galaxies (SMGs) discovered at redshift (Chapman et al., 2002). The relatively cold ( K) dust temperatures of these SMGs may indicate starburst activity in a disk rather than a spheroid. In comparison, the FIR SED of super spiral 2MASX J13275756+3345291 (SS 05, see Appendix) is fit by the sum of a cold dust component with K, likely from the disk, and a warmer dust component with temperature K, likely from the starbursting bulge. GN20, one of the most luminous sub-mm detected star bursting galaxies, shows molecular gas and star formation distributed in a 10 kpc scale disk at (Carilli, C. L. et al., 2010). Deep near to mid-IR imaging of SMGs at intermediate redshifts will be necessary to measure their sizes and stellar masses and better determine their relationship to super spirals.

7.2. Formation and Survival

We estimate an average super spiral number density of Gpc at , correcting for incompleteness at high disk inclination (§4.5). The space density of super spirals is therefore only of the space density of elliptical galaxies in the same -band luminosity range. Even the largest galaxy evolution simulations to date, such as the Illustris simulation (Vogelsberger et al., 2014; Snyder et al., 2015), covering Gpc, are not big enough to manufacture a significant number of super spirals. Therefore, no adequate prediction exists for the expected number of super spirals at , nor are there simulations showing how these giant disk galaxies might form.

Super spirals could be formed by gas-rich major spiral-spiral mergers. Simulations that collide two gas-rich disk galaxies are able to produce post-merger spiral galaxies, albeit at smaller scale (Barnes, 2002; Springel & Hernquist, 2005; Robertson et al, 2006; Hopkins et al., 2009). While merging stellar disks are typically destroyed, the gas in the outer disks may combine to reform an even larger gas and stellar disk. Orbital geometry may also be important, with misaligned or retrograde orbits leading to more gas-rich final merger products. If the dynamical timescales are longer and the merger-induced torques are even weaker in the outer disks of super spiral mergers, this may also be conducive to the preservation of gas disks and reformation of stellar disks. Alternatively, super spirals might be formed more gradually, from the inside out by accretion of cold gas. This may require a relatively low halo mass in order to avoid accretion shocks, which might prevent the gas from settling onto the outer disk Dekel & Birnboim (2006). It will be important to study the spatial distribution of both neutral gas and star formation in super spirals to gain further insight into how their disks are formed.

It appears that the super spirals in our sample have so far avoided the fate of the vast majority of the most massive galaxies and continue to form stars in spite of their extreme mass, bucking the trend of cosmic downsizing. There are several possible reasons for this success. First, super spirals may be robust to mergers because of their massive, dissipative gaseous disks. It appears that several super spirals in our sample have survived recent major mergers with their star-forming disks intact. Second, the supermassive black holes in super spiral bulges may not be large enough to provide enough feedback to drive away the gas in the giant galaxy disk. Third, the halo mass may not be large enough to cut off cold accretion onto the disk via accretion shocks. Finally, a large enough gas reservoir may have already settled into the disk to fuel star formation for a long time into the future. Observations across the electromagnetic spectrum are called for to distinguish among these possibilities.

7.3. Connection to Quenched Disk Galaxies

Super spirals occupy a relatively empty corner of the SFR vs. stellar mass diagram (Figure 1b). They lie above an extrapolation of the star-forming main sequence, at the most extreme mass and SFR. We find that most super spirals have SSFR Gyr. They are forming stars at a rate that would allow them to build up their mass in less than the age of the universe. This is unlike similarly massive, yet much more common disk galaxies (early type spirals and lenticulars) that fall below the star-forming main sequence, in what we shall call the disk quenching sequence (DQS: the disk galaxy subset of the green valley population). The disk-quenching sequence is discussed in the context of SSFR and UV color evolution by Schawinski et al. (2014), and in the context of IR color evolution by Alatalo et al. (2014). Quenching disk galaxies are likely greatly reduced in their ability to form stars because their supply of cold gas has been cut off (e.g. Dekel & Birnboim, 2006).

The most densely populated ridge of the DQS is close to the median stellar mass of our super spiral sample (). We suggest that the majority of disk galaxies along this ridge were once super spirals. At a minimum, galaxies of this mass must have attained an average SFR yr in order to have formed in less than the age of the universe. This would put them squarely in the SFR and SSFR range of super spirals. A further implication is that their kpc diameter stellar disks must have faded dramatically. If fossil giant disks are detected around massive lenticular galaxies with deep imaging, it will provide strong evidence for this hypothesis. In addition, deep H i and CO observations may reveal if their cold gas reservoir has been entirely depleted or reduced to a level that is not conducive to star formation.

8. Conclusions

We report the discovery of a large sample of the most optically luminous (), biggest, and most massive spiral galaxies in the universe, which we call super spirals. These galaxies are very rare ( Gpc ), but are easily observed out to because of their high luminosities and gigantic sizes. Super spirals are forming stars at yr, a rate greater than their mean SFR over the age of the universe. Bulge-disk decompositions confirm the presence of giant stellar disks, with a median exponential scale length of 12.2 kpc, 2.3 times the median scale length of less luminous spirals at the same redshift. The bulge-to-total optical luminosity distribution is also significantly different for super spirals, showing a deficit of galaxies with , and a concentration of galaxies with . Roughly 11% of super spirals have Seyfert or QSO nuclei, suggesting that they are still actively adding mass to their supermassive black holes. We find evidence that several super spirals are undergoing major mergers, but manage to keep their star-forming disks intact, and avoid being transformed in to red-and-dead elliptical galaxies. Some super spirals are brightest cluster galaxies, while others appear to be isolated in the field. We suggest that super spirals may be the progenitors of red and dead lenticular galaxies of similar mass.

This work was made possible by the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database and the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which are both operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank Joe Mazzarella, Ben Chan, Marion Schmitz, and the rest of the NED team for useful discussions and their support of this work. This publication makes use of data from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, retrieved from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NNX09AF08G and by other grants and contracts. Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, and the Participating Institutions. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS web site is This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. We also make use of data from Herschel, an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA. We thank Katey Alatalo for providing the SDSS-WISE comparison data in Figure 1a, which is adapted from Alatalo et al. (2014). We thank Phil Hopkins and Ski Antonucci for insightful discussions that contributed to the manuscript. Finally, we thank the anonymous referee for suggesting that we analyze available bulge-disk decompositions by Simard et al. (2009), strengthening our results.


  • Alatalo et al. (2014) Alatalo, K., Cales, S. L., Appleton, P. N. et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, L13
  • Baldry et al. (2004) Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, 681
  • Barnes (2002) Barnes, J. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 481
  • Barnes & Hernquist (1991) Barnes, J. E. & Hernquist, L. E. 1991, ApJ, 370, L65
  • Bell et al. (2003) Bell, E. F., McIntosh, D. H., Katz, N., & Weinberg, M. D. 2003, ApJS, 149, 289
  • Blanton et al. (2003) Blanton, M. R., Hogg, D. W., Bahcall, N. A, et al. 2003, ApJ, 592, 819
  • Bothun et al. (1987) Bothun, G. D., Impey, C. D., Malin, D. F., & Mould, J. R. 1987, AJ, 94, 23
  • Brinchmann et al. (2004) Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151
  • Carilli, C. L. et al. (2010) Carilli, C. L., Daddi, E., Riechers, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1407
  • Chang et al. (2015) Chang, Y.-Y., van der Wel, A., da Cunha, E., & Rix, H.-W. 2015, ApJS, 219, 8
  • Chapman et al. (2002) Chapman, S. C., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Helou, G., Dale, D. A., & Lagache, G. 2002, ApJ, 573, 66
  • da Cunha, Charlot, & Elbaz (2008) da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 339, 1595
  • Dekel & Birnboim (2006) Dekel, K. & Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2
  • Elbaz et al. (2007) Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D. et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33
  • Hopkins et al. (2009) Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Younger, J. D., & Hernquist, L. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1168
  • Hopkins et al. (2006) Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1
  • Joye & Mandel (2003) Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, ASPCS, 295, 489, eds. Payne, H. E., Jedrezejewsk, R. I. & Hook, R. N.
  • Lilly et al. (2013) Lilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., Pipino, A., Renzini, A., & Peng, Y. 2013, ApJ, 772, 119
  • Lintott et al. (2008) Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1179
  • Ogle et al. (2015) Ogle, P. M., Mazzarella, J., Ebert, R., Fadda, D., Lo, T., Terek, S., Schmitz, M., & The NED Team. 2015, ASPCS, 495, 25, eds. Taylor, A. R., & Rosolowsky, E.
  • Ogle, Lanz, & Appleton (2014) Ogle, P., Lanz, L., & Appleton, P. 2014, ApJ, 788, L33
  • Robertson et al (2006) Robertson, B., Bullock, J. S., Cox, T. J. , et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 986
  • Romanishin (1983) Romanishin, W., 1983, MNRAS, 204, 909
  • Rubin, Ford, & Thonnard (1980) Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., & Thonnard, N. 1980, ApJ, 238, 471
  • Schawinski et al. (2014) Schawinski, K., Urry, C. M., Simmons, B. D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 889
  • Schechter (1976) Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297
  • Simard et al. (2011) Simard, L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R., Ellison, S. L., & McConnachie, A. W. 2011, ApJS, 196, 11
  • Simard et al. (2009) Simard, L., Clowe, D., Desai, V., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1141
  • Sivanandam, Rieke, & Rieke (2014) Sivanandam, S., Rieke, M. J., & Rieke, G. H. 2014, ApJ, 796, 89
  • Snyder et al. (2015) Snyder, G. F., Torrey, P., Lotz, J. M. et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1886
  • Springel & Hernquist (2005) Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, ApJ, 622, L9
  • Stoughton et al. (2002) Stoughton, C., Lupton, R. H., Bernardi, M., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 485
  • Strateva et al. (2001) Strateva, I., Ivezic, Z., Knapp, G. R., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1861
  • Strauss et al. (2002) Strauss, M. A., Weinberg, D. H., Lupton, R. H. et al., AJ, 124, 1810
  • Toomre & Toomre (1972) Toomre, A. & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623
  • Vogelsberger et al. (2014) Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., Springel, V. et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518
  • Wuyts et al. (2011) Wuyts, S., Forster Schreiber, N. M., van der Wel, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 96
  • Wyder et al. (2005) Wyder, T. K., Treyer, M. A., Milliard, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L15
SS OGC NED Name () aaIsophotal diameter (kpc) at mag arcsec. bb () or upper limit, based on 2MASS luminosity and color. SFRcc SFR ( yr) or 95% confidence upper limit, based on WISE 12 m luminosity. RedshiftddSDSS DR9 redshift. NUV Notes
01 0065 2MASX J103015760106068 13.9 81.3 11.25 1.54 0.28228 21.02eeGALEX NUV-band photometry measured in aperture. Source not in GASC or GMSC. 16.92 2.54 bar
02 0073 2MASX J104056430103584 13.4 82.2 11.39 0.97 0.25024 21.65 16.64 2.16 BCG
03 0139 2MASX J163945984609058 12.0 134. 11.05 1.48 0.24713 19.85 16.63 2.37 edge-on
04 0170 2MASX J101007073253295 11.6 87.1 11.27 1.40 0.28990 20.14 17.10 2.68 BCG, bar
05 0217 2MASX J132757563345291 11.2 68.8 11.05 1.81 0.24892 19.44 16.72 2.02 starburst, bar
06 0256 2MASX J115935461257080 10.9 87.2 10.89 1.26 0.26353 20.04 16.95 1.79
07 0265 SDSS J115052.98460448.1 10.8 88.1 10.94 0.28946 21.51eeGALEX NUV-band photometry measured in aperture. Source not in GASC or GMSC. 17.19 3.25 faint spiral
08 0290 2MASX J123430995156295 10.6 62.4 11.13 1.71 0.29592 19.57 17.25 1.67 Sy1, asymm.
09 0299 2MASX J090944802226078 10.5 83.1 11.26 0.28539 21.40 17.25 3.73 BCG, shells?
10 0302 2MASX J15430777+1937522 10.5 65.5 11.37 2.45ffThis SFR may be overestimated by a large factor because of the QSO nucleus. 0.22941 17.07 0.40 QSO, tidal arm
11 0306 SDSS J122100.48482729.1 10.5 75.0 10.82 1.02 0.29966 20.15 17.29 1.69
12 0345 2MASX J092608052405242 10.3 81.2 11.27 1.38 0.22239 19.61 16.57 3.38 BCG, face-on
13 0388 2MASX J173406136029190 10.1 63.5 11.20 1.27 0.27596 20.51 17.19 2.71 BGG
14 0441 SDSS J095727.02083501.7 9.9 87.6 11.53 1.13 0.25652 20.88 16.99 2.19
15 0454 2MASXi J1003568+382901 9.9 56.4 10.82 1.65 0.25860 19.79 16.97 1.70 starburst
16 0543 2MASX J094700102540462 9.6 99.3 11.07 1.13 0.10904 17.74 14.83 2.57 bar, Sy1?
17 0586 2MASX J115356214923562 9.5 90.2 11.11 1.43 0.16673 19.92 15.90 2.64 BCG, Sy2
18 0595 2MASX J075504241353261 9.5 76.6 11.12 1.30 0.22264 19.71 16.67 2.47 bar
19 0696 SDSS J102154.85072415.5 9.2 69.7 1.35 0.29061 19.89 17.37 2.01
20 0713 2MASX J082655121811476 9.2 81.9 11.27 1.32 0.26545 21.01 17.16 3.26 bar
21 0755 SDSS J113800.88521303.9 9.1 63.9 10.76 1.14 0.29593 20.94 17.41 2.12 ring
22 0789 2MASX J085421690449308 9.0 86.0 10.96 1.30 0.15679 18.68 15.83 2.49 2 spirals, bar
23 0799 2MASX J104725052309174 9.0 72.2 11.12 1.20 0.18256 20.61 16.19 2.68 bar
24 0800 2MASX J111917391419465 9.0 70.8 10.93 1.15 0.14377 18.75 15.57 2.39
25 0804 SDSS J135546.07025455.8 9.0 84.2 1.01 0.23884 19.77 16.87 1.74
26 0830 SDSS J141754.96270434.4 9.0 68.6 10.70 1.11 0.15753 19.74 15.79 2.86
27 0926 2MASX J103042630418219 8.8 72.7 11.19 1.60 0.16902 19.08 15.93 2.16
28 0928 2MASX J123746684812273 8.8 66.0 11.01 1.57 0.27245 19.79 17.24 2.10
29 0975 2MASX J114100013848078 8.7 72.1 11.08 1.38 0.26770 20.79 17.21 2.15
30 0983 SDSS J153618.97452246.8 8.7 80.2 10.48 1.07 0.23618 20.15 16.85 2.13
31 1046 2MASX J093622083906291 8.6 69.6 10.99 1.37 0.28293 20.09 17.36 1.78
32 1088 SDSS J140138.37263527.6 8.5 78.2 1.24 0.28396 19.99 17.38 2.08
33 1196 SDSS J154950.91234444.1 8.4 69.3 1.30 0.26208 20.48 17.27 2.02
34 1250 2MASX J123215151021195 8.3 71.4 10.95 1.06 0.16588 19.69 16.04 2.76 2 bulges?
35 1268 2MASX J120053934800076 8.3 62.7 11.10 1.45 0.27841 20.04 17.37 2.05 BCG
36 1273 2MASX J073806152823592 8.3 76.6 11.01 1.28 0.23091 20.13 16.92 2.34
37 1304 2MASX J160140612718161 8.3 82.3 11.03 1.17 0.16440 17.60 16.06 1.60 BCG, 2 spirals
38 1312 SDSS J143447.86020228.6 8.2 75.4 10.67 1.48 0.27991 20.43 17.42 2.24
39 1323 SDSS J112928.74025549.9 8.2 69.7 10.63 1.23 0.23960 19.56 17.01 2.00
40 1352 SDSS J101603.97303747.9 8.2 68.8 10.73 ggWISE data compromised by nearby IR-bright star. 0.25191 21.16 17.13 2.94
41 1375 2MASX J001550121002427 8.2 68.4 10.94 0.91 0.17601 16.23 2.09
42 1395 2MASX J131039302235023 8.1 65.6 11.08 1.15 0.23123 19.91 16.87 2.59
43 1420 2MASX J134759623227100 8.1 87.5 10.94 1.23 0.22306 20.25 16.79 2.37 BGG
44 1464 2MASX J100416062958441 8.1 57.4 11.04 1.81 0.29844 20.64 17.59 2.06 starburst
45 1500 2MASX J100956352611324 8.1 63.7 10.98 1.33 0.24089 19.99 17.03 2.19
46 1501 2MASX J093347772114362 8.1 63.6 11.00 1.69 0.17219 17.84 16.17 1.60 QSO, 2 nuclei
47 1544 2MASX J144728345908314 8.0 68.4 11.13 1.13 0.24551 20.22 17.04 2.15
48 1546 2MASX J134355492440484 8.0 60.7 11.05 0.89 0.13725 19.54 15.56 2.50
49 1554 2MASX J134228331157345 8.0 57.1 11.08 1.43 0.27873 21.66 17.43 2.20
50 1559 CGCG 122-067 8.0 81.4 11.13 1.00 0.08902 18.27 14.56 3.13 BCG, 2 bulges
51 1606 SDSS J121644.34122450.5 8.0 77.9 1.13 0.25694 20.12 17.22 1.76 bar, Sy1
52 1608 SDSS J040422.91054134.9 8.0 79.5 10.56 1.07 0.25055 20.38 17.27 2.37 flocculent
53 1611 2MASX J003807810109365 8.0 83.9 11.31 0.91 0.20828 21.33 16.65 4.38 E with shells?
Table 1OGC Super Spiral Sample
SS NED Name ScaleaaScale [kpc/]. bbBulge fraction in SDSS DR7 -band image. ccBulge eccentricity. ddDisk exponential scale length. eeDisk inclination (). PAffDisk PA (). ggSmoothness in r band.
01 2MASX J103015760106068 4.268 0.13 0.67 14.39 37 33 0.07
02 2MASX J104056430103584 3.914 0.66 0.25 12.43 2 74 0.04
03 2MASX J163945984609058 3.879 0.13 0.01 32.98 76 28 0.04
04 2MASX J101007073253295 4.349 0.12 0.22 15.31 31 57 0.02
05 2MASX J132757563345291 3.898 0.29 0.70 11.34 40 77 0.17
06 2MASX J115935461257080 4.063 0.03 0.03 16.24 35 114 0.04
07 SDSS J115052.98460448.1 4.345 0.46 0.64 12.17 62 125 0.04
08 2MASX J123430995156295 4.412 0.26 0.56 11.52 27 -17 0.24
09 2MASX J090944802226078 4.302 0.41 0.48 19.04 46 153 0.06
10 2MASX J154307771937522
11 SDSS J122100.48482729.1 4.452 0.19 0.01 12.14 27 13 0.03
12 2MASX J092608052405242 3.583 0.15 0.53 17.45 29 96 0.02
13 2MASX J173406136029190 4.200 0.29 0.05 9.06 20 13 0.03
14 SDSS J095727.02083501.7 3.986 0.13 0.42 16.97 39 4 0.06
15 2MASXi J1003568382901 4.009 0.11 0.24 6.25 39 50 0.06
16 2MASX J094700102540462 1.991 0.21 0.51 17.31 43 150 0.08
17 2MASX J115356214923562 2.855 0.17 0.38 15.67 63 144 0.13
18 2MASX J075504241353261 3.585 0.07 0.69 12.91 24 87 0.07
19 SDSS J102154.85072415.5 4.357 0.16 0.69 13.24 42 54 0.11
20 2MASX J082655121811476 4.086 0.21 0.32 13.45 57 5 0.09
21 SDSS J113800.88521303.9 4.414 0.23 0.50 12.83 36 103 0.11
22 2MASX J085421690449308 2.713 0.08 0.68 12.14 36 58 0.10
23 2MASX J104725052309174 3.071 0.18 0.70 8.84 45 156 0.17
24 2MASX J111917391419465 2.523 0.46 0.11 10.22 47 153 0.07
25 SDSS J135546.07025455.8 3.779 0.07 0.29 16.28 31 140 0.04
26 SDSS J141754.96270434.4 2.723
27 2MASX J103042630418219 2.774 0.19 0.47 8.67 48 25 0.14
28 2MASX J123746684812273 4.164 0.12 0.66 10.39 31 192 0.11
29 2MASX J114100013848078 4.108 0.12 0.55 10.62 37 3 0.04
30 SDSS J153618.97452246.8 3.749 0.11 0.46 16.36 44 81 0.08
31 2MASX J093622083906291 4.276 0.07 0.50 11.43 30 -4 0.05
32 SDSS J140138.37263527.6 4.287 0.09 0.13 14.41 40 11 0.04
33 SDSS J154950.91234444.1 4.049 0.18 0.19 12.20 36 168 0.06
34 2MASX J123215151021195 2.841 0.16 0.02 13.18 42 10 0.10
35 2MASX J120053934800076 4.226 0.18 0.50 8.51 36 145 0.05
36 2MASX J073806152823592 3.687 0.13 0.66 12.61 45 31 0.06
37 2MASX J160140612718161 2.823 0.04 0.70 11.43 59 180 0.23
38 SDSS J143447.86020228.6 4.244 0.24 0.10 11.61 63 10 0.09
39 SDSS J112928.74025549.9 3.788 0.09 0.39 14.45 13 221 0.05
40 SDSS J101603.97303747.9 3.934 0.17 0.68 10.03 12 107 0.04
41 2MASX J001550121002427 2.982 0.36 0.36 9.81 14 38 0.08
42 2MASX J131039302235023 3.690 0.13 0.69 9.73 36 30 0.06
43 2MASX J134759623227100 3.590 0.14 0.16 14.17 37 97 0.05
44 2MASX J100416062958441 4.439 0.17 0.30 6.74 48 137 0.09
45 2MASX J100956352611324 3.804 0.08 0.70 11.82 1 105 0.11
46 2MASX J093347772114362 2.929 0.22 0.38 5.48 6 140 0.06
47 2MASX J144728345908314 3.857 0.14 0.69 11.70 21 48 0.08
48 2MASX J134355492440484 2.427 0.55 0.00 11.14 33 159 0.05
49 2MASX J134228331157345 4.234 0.40 0.18 8.76 2 53 0.06
50 CGCG 122-067 1.663 0.34 0.41 9.01 38 84
51 SDSS J121644.34122450.5 3.992 0.06 0.70 12.23 21 125 0.10
52 SDSS J040422.91054134.9 3.917 0.31 0.30 14.75 39 100 0.03
53 2MASX J003807810109365 3.409 0.39 0.43 13.60 58 76 0.07
Table 2Bulge-disk Decomposition (Simard et al., 2011)
SS NED Name Redshift N1aaNumber of galaxies within 1 Mpc and 500 km s. N10bbNumber of galaxies within 10 Mpc and 5000 km s. Cluster Name Type Redshift ztypeccRedshift type, from NED. EST–estimated, PHOT–photometric, and SPEC–spectroscopic. Sep()
02 2MASX J10405643-0103584 0.250303 1 8 SDSS CE J160.241898-01.069106 GClstr 0.254019 EST 0.013
04 2MASX J10100707+3253295 0.289913 2 17 GMBCG J152.52936+32.89139 GClstr 0.319000 PHOT 0.001
09 2MASX J09094480+2226078 0.285386 1 9 GMBCG J137.43670+22.43538 GClstr 0.303000 PHOT 0.000
12 2MASX J09260805+2405242 0.222451 1 22 WHL J092608.1+240524 GClstr 0.178000 PHOT 0.000
13 2MASX J17340613+6029190 0.275807 1 2 SDSSCGB 59704 GGroup 0.276000ddThe association of the super spiral galaxy with the compact group is based only on proximity on the sky. The group redshift in NED for SDSSCGB 59704 appears to be based only on the redshift of the super spiral. None of the other galaxies in SDSSCGB 16827 have measured redshifts. SPEC 0.450
17 2MASX J11535621+4923562 0.166892 3 69 OGC 0586 CLUSTER GClstr 0.166187 SPEC 0.000
35 2MASX J12005393+4800076 0.278617 1 13 GMBCG J180.22479+48.00211 GClstr 0.252000 PHOT 0.001
37 2MASX J16014061+2718161 0.164554 3 163 GMBCG J240.41924+27.30444 GClstr 0.193000 PHOT 0.000
43 2MASX J13475962+3227100 0.223113 1 13 SDSSCGB 16827 GGroup ddThe association of the super spiral galaxy with the compact group is based only on proximity on the sky. The group redshift in NED for SDSSCGB 59704 appears to be based only on the redshift of the super spiral. None of the other galaxies in SDSSCGB 16827 have measured redshifts. 0.748
50 CGCG 122-067 0.089008 5 302 MSPM 05544 GClstr 0.089190 SPEC 0.001
Table 3Candidate Cluster and Group Membership

Appendix A Custom Photometry and Validation of and SFR

In order to validate our stellar mass and SFR estimates, which are based on , , , and WISE 12 m photometry, we make a more detailed analysis of two representative examples from our super spiral sample. We remeasure their photometry in matched apertures, rather than relying on catalog photometry. Then we fit their SEDs to make full use of the available multi-band photometry to estimate more accurate and SFR. We chose SDSS J094700.08+254045.7 (SS 16) for this analysis because it is one of the brightest super spirals in our sample, with good photometry in many bands, and typical colors. The SDSS spectrum of its bulge is also typical of most super spirals, being dominated by an old stellar population (Figure 9). We also make a detailed study of 2MASX J13275756+3345291 (SS 05), which is the most luminous (non-QSO) mid-IR source in our sample and has an SDSS nuclear spectrum with strong young stellar component and high-equivalent width H emission (Figure 10), characteristic of starburst activity.

We remeasured GALEX (FUV, NUV), SDSS (, , , , ), 2MASS (, , ) and WISE band 1-4 photometry for SS 16 using the SAOImager ds9 (Joye & Mandel, 2003) on images retrieved from MAST, SDSS, and IRSA (Figure 11). Aperture and color corrections were applied as necessary and the GALEX and SDSS photometry was corrected for foreground extinction due to the Milky Way dust (Wyder et al., 2005; Stoughton et al., 2002). The Galactic extinction is a modest mag (NED). We used an elliptical aperture with semimajor and semiminor axes of and , respectively, in order to capture the full flux of the spiral disk in all bands. This corresponds to major and minor diameters of 125 kpc and 102 kpc. We also compute IRAS upper limits based on the rms uncertainty measured by IRSA’s Scan Processing and Integration tool (SCANPI) to constrain the FIR luminosity.

We present the SED of SS 16 in Figure 12. The galaxy is detected in all GALEX, SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE bands, but is undetected by IRAS. The UV through near-IR data points reveal a massive old stellar population plus a young stellar population. Mid-IR emission appears to be dominated by PAHs and warm dust from star formation. We fit the SED using magphys template fitting (da Cunha, Charlot, & Elbaz, 2008). This gives a total stellar mass of and SFR of yr. We get a consistent estimate of for the stellar mass from the color and -band luminosity, applying the Bell et al. (2003) prescription for color-dependent mass-to-light ratio (Table 1). The WISE band 3 luminosity gives a consistent SFR of yr, using the prescription of Chang et al. (2015). Lacking FIR detections, we do not have a good handle on the total dust mass, however, the SED fit formally yields a dust mass of , based on the PAH emission and FIR upper limits. This corresponds to roughly of gas, assuming a standard gas/dust ratio of 100.

We remeasured GALEX (FUV, NUV), SDSS (, , , , ), 2MASS (, , ) and WISE band 1-4 photometry for SS 05 (Figure 13), using a similar procedure. We also retrieved Spitzer IRAC and MIPS, and Herschel PACS and SPIRE images from the respective IRSA and ESA archives to measure the IR fluxes. We used a circular aperture with (156 kpc) radius for most bands. However, at SPIRE wavelengths, we used the larger point source apertures of , , and , in order to contain the broader point-spread function. The Galactic extinction is only mag (NED).

We present the SED of SS 05 in Figure 14. The galaxy is detected in all measured bands except the SPIRE 500 m band. In contrast to SS 16, there is a stronger component of emission from young stars, and much more luminous IR emission from star formation activity. We fit the SED using magphys, yielding a total stellar mass of and SFR of yr. The stellar mass is consistent with the value of that we obtain from the color and -band luminosity (Table 1). The WISE [12] luminosity gives a somewhat larger SFR of yr, using the conversion factor of Chang et al. (2015). The Herschel FIR measurements yield a secure estimate of total dust mass from the SED fit of , corresponding to of gas, assuming a standard gas/dust ratio of 100.

Figure 9.— SDSS DR9 optical spectrum and spectral model of SDSS J094700.08+254045.7 (SS 16). Note the possible broad H emission line not fit by the spectral model, indicative of a Seyfert 1 AGN .
Figure 10.— SDSS DR9 optical spectrum and spectral model of 2MASX J13275756+334529 (SS 05). The blue spectral slope and strong H emission indicate starburst activity in the galaxy bulge that contributes to the high star formation rate in the galaxy as a whole.
Figure 11.— GALEX, SDSS, 2MASS and WISE images of SDSS J094700.08+254045.7 (SS 16). The image scale is 1.991 kpc/. The photometric aperture with major and minor axes of 125 kpc and 102 kpc, respectively, is indicated by the ellipse on the SDSS image.
Figure 12.— Spectral Energy Distribution of SDSS J094700.08+254045.7 (SS 16) fit by magphys. GALEX (NUV, FUV), SDSS (, , , , ), 2MASS (, , ), and WISE band 1-4 photometry are measured in the aperture shown in 11. IRAS upper limits at 25, 60, and 100 m are estimated using SCANPI.
Figure 13.— GALEX, SDSS, Spitzer IRAC, and Herschel images of 2MASX J13275756+334529 (SS 05). The image scale is 3.898 kpc/. The circular photometric aperture with diameter 156 kpc and two exclusion regions are indicated on the SDSS image.
Figure 14.— Spectral Energy Distribution of 2MASX J13275756+334529 (SS 05) fit by magphys. GALEX (NUV, FUV), SDSS (, , , , ), 2MASS (, , ), Spitzer IRAC and MIPS 24, 70, and 160 m, WISE band 1-4, Herschel PACS 100 and 160 m, and SPIRE photometry are measured in the aperture shown in Figure 13. SPIRE 500 m luminosity is an upper limit.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description