STEREO Observations of Quasi-Periodically Driven High Velocity Outflows in Polar Plumes

STEREO Observations of Quasi-Periodically Driven High Velocity Outflows in Polar Plumes

Scott W. McIntosh High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA    Davina E. Innes Max-Planck Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany    Bart De Pontieu Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Lab, 3251 Hanover St., Org. ADBS, Bldg. 252, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA    and Robert J. Leamon ADNET Systems Inc., NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA now at Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA mscott@ucar.edu
Received … / Accepted …
Key Words.:
Sun: corona - (Sun:) solar wind - Sun: transition region
offprints: S. W. McIntosh
Abstract

Context:Plumes are one of the most ubiquitous features seen at the limb in polar coronal holes and are considered to be a source of high density plasma streams to the fast solar wind.

Aims:We analyze STEREO observations of plumes and aim to reinterpret and place observations with previous generations of EUV imagers within a new context that was recently developed from Hinode observations.

Methods:We exploit the higher signal-to-noise, spatial and temporal resolution of the EUVI telescopes over that of SOHO/EIT to study the temporal variation of polar plumes in high detail. We employ recently developed insight from imaging (and spectral) diagnostics of active region, plage, and quiet Sun plasmas to identify the presence of apparent motions as high-speed upflows in magnetic regions as opposed to previous interpretations of propagating waves.

Results:In almost all polar plumes observed at the limb in these STEREO sequences, in all coronal passbands, we observe high speed jets of plasma traveling along the structures with a mean velocity of 135 km/s at a range of temperatures from 0.5-1.5 MK. The jets have an apparent brightness enhancement of 5% above that of the plumes they travel on and repeat quasi-periodically, with repeat-times ranging from five to twenty-five minutes. We also notice a very weak, fine scale, rapidly evolving, but ubiquitous companion of the plumes that covers the entire coronal hole limb.

Conclusions:The observed jets are remarkably similar in intensity enhancement, periodicity and velocity to those observed in other magnetic regions of the solar atmosphere. They are multi-thermal in nature. We infer that the jets observed on the plumes are a source of heated mass to the fast solar wind. Further, based on the previous results that motivated this study, we suggest that these jets originated in the upper chromosphere.

1 Introduction

Plumes are one of the most ubiquitous features seen at the limb in polar coronal holes (e.g., Newkirk & Harvey, 1968). In recent years they have been studied at great detail (see, e.g., DeForest et al, 1997; Ofman et al., 1999; Banerjee et al., 2009, as a representative few), are thought of sources of dense plasma in the fast solar wind (e.g., Gabriel et al., 2003) that result from the relentless magnetoconvective forcing of the upper solar atmospheric plasma (e.g., Wang, 1998; McIntosh et al., 2007).

Figure 1: Context of the observations provided by the STEREO-A SECCHI/EUVI 171Å passband. The North PCH region that provides the focus of the presented analysis is shown in the box. The inset panels on the right of the figure show the first 304Å, 171Å, 195Å, and 284Å images of the February 12 2009 sequence. Also shown in the inset panels are the location of the synthetic slit used to generate the timeseries shown in Fig. 2. The online edition of the journal has movies in support of the four inset panels.

In this Letter we use high cadence observations by the STEREO spacecraft to explore the weak, fine, temporal variations of the emitting material that appear to be ubiquitous in polar plumes. We use a simple space-time data analysis technique similar to that used in the investigation of quasi-periodic intensity perturbations in active regions. McIntosh & De Pontieu (2009a) followed from De Pontieu et al. (2009) to demonstrate that these weak, quasi-periodic, perturbations in coronal imaging data are directly related with the weak, high speed Doppler velocity signals in the blue wing of several coronal emission lines. Further, these blue-wing asymmetries are co-spatial and co-temporal with high speed chromospheric jets, or “Type-II” spicules (De Pontieu et al., 2007a), rooted in the magnetic footpoints of the active region. McIntosh & De Pontieu (2009b) (and McIntosh, Leamon & De Pontieu, 2010) showed that these upflows are ubiquitous also in magnetic network regions (of the quiet sun and coronal holes), again occurring quasi-periodically with repeat times ranging from a few, to several tens of minutes, and with speeds determined from the analysis of line profile asymmetries of many spectral lines (formed over a broad range of formation temperatures) that are similar to those observed in the apparent motions derived from coronal imaging data (e.g., Schrijver et al., 1999).

In the following sections we discuss the STEREO observations used, and the analysis techniques employed. Based on an argument of similarity with spectroscopic and imaging features observed ubiquitously in quiet, coronal hole, and active solar plasmas alike we suggest that the quasi-periodic jets in polar plumes observed at the limb by STEREO are likely to be similarly excited, with roots in dynamic upper chromospheric activity. We conclude by discussing the implications of this new interpretation, looking forward to observational tests of the paradigm and closing with speculation on the impact of our interpretation on the process of solar wind acceleration.

2 Observations & Reduction

The observations discussed in this Letter were taken by the EUVI/SECCHI telescopes on the STEREO spacecraft from 14:00-18:00 UT on 12-15 Feb 2009. During the four hours of observation on each day, STEREO-A took 171Å passband images every 75s that were synchronized with 304Å images of STEREO-B. The EUVI telescopes also took a slightly lower cadence (95s) synchronized sequence of STEREO-A 304Å and STEREO-B 171Å over the same period with context images in the 195Å and 284Å passbands every 10 minutes. At this time STEREO-B was 47.5 behind the earth and STEREO-Awas 43.4 ahead, yielding a total spacecraft separation angle of 91.

The EUVI/SECCHI data have been calibrated using the standard SolarSoft IDL routines. They were corrected for the telescope roll angle and deprojected so that the solar B angle is zero, for all images. The disk center images were then corrected for differential rotation, and aligned to the start time of each sequence. We then expanded the Sun in the B images to match the radius of the A images. After using the numbers from the headers, we still found small corrections were necessary to achieve perfect co-alignment of features. The STEREO-A images required an additional rotation of 2 and the Sun center in the STEREO-B images was shifted north by 5″.

3 Analysis & Results

We have isolated the North polar coronal hole (PCH) region in the EUV imaging sequences shown in Fig. 1. The online edition of the journal contains movies of the 304, 171, 195, and 284Å passbands of the A spacecraft in this region. From those movies the temporal variability of the polar plume above the north polar limb () is easily observed in all three coronal passbands. Connection of the plume to the low transition region plasma (304Å) is complicated by the prominent fore- and background spicules (and macrospicules). We interpret the very weak emission seen in the 284Å passband as that of the Si VII 275Å emission line that is formed, in equilibrium, at 0.6MK (Mazzotta et al., 1998) and dominates the passband in quieter network regions near solar minimum.

Figure 2: Example frame from the background-subtracted STEREO-A 171Å sequence. The synthetic slit used to compute the timeseries shown in Fig. 3 is shown as a red dot-dashed line. The online edition of the journal has a movie in support of this figure.

To quantify the variability in the plume we produce a timeseries of background subtracted images by removing a 5pixel (7.75″) boxcar smoothed version of each image in the 171Å sequence from itself. As a result of this processing only the finer spatial scale fluctuations remain (cf. McIntosh & De Pontieu, 2009a). Placing a 100″ long “slit” at normal to the limb for the 171Å STEREO-A sequence we obtain the timeseries shown in Fig. 2.

In Fig. 3 we assess the temporal variation of the emission along the slit. In the top panel we show the percentage change in the background-subtracted timeseries imaged along the slit and see the series of inclined alternating black and white stripes. The white stripes represent intensity enhancements of 5-7%. The inclination of the stripes indicates the propagation speed of the disturbance along the chosen trajectory where, for reference, we show a red line on the jet starting 95 minutes into the timeseries with a velocity of 142 ( 10 km/s, cf. Deforest & Gurman, 1998; Lites et al., 1999). This velocity is representative of the complete sample as there is only 15 km/s variance throughout the four hours of observation indicating that the apparent motion is a function of the plume’s thermodynamic or magnetic properties. The occurrence of these disturbances can be determined by taking a spatially-averaged cut through the slit timeseries (; dot-dashed region in the top panel) and shown in the center panel. We see that the occurrence of the disturbances is roughly quasi-periodic with events occurring anywhere from 5 to 15 minutes apart. Their strength or amplitude shows less variability (6% enhancement) as we have noted above. The quasi-periodic nature of the occurrence of these disturbances can be viewed in another way by computing the wavelet power spectrum of the timeseries as is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 3. The regions of the wavelet power spectrum enclosed in contours are those which have 95% statistical significance (Torrence & Compo, 1998). The wavelet power spectrum confirms our visual inspection of the spatial cut through the timeseries — it shows a broad range of significant periods but one of predominantly 15-18 minutes (1mHz) for a large part of timeseries. Such quasi-periodicities have been noted before by Deforest & Gurman (1998) and Banerjee et al. (2000, 2009) where they were interpreted as belonging to propagating slow-mode magneto-acoustic waves.

Figure 3: Timeseries analysis of a plume in the STEREO-A 171Å image sequence derived from the synthetic slit position shown in Fig. 2. From top to bottom we see the percentage change in the background-subtracted timeseries imaged along the slit, a spatially-averaged cut through the slit timeseries (dot-dashed region in the top panel), and the wavelet power spectrum and its 95% confidence level (white contours).

Using a tool like the xslice routine (publically available in the SolarSoft IDL analysis tree) permits the exploration of the 171Å image sequences from both spacecraft, in both polar regions, and to characterize the appearance of ten clearly defined plumes present in the data. Using the method of McIntosh & Smillie (2004) to determine the plume repeat times we characterize the wavelet power spectra we see plume disturbance periods in a range of 16.6 ( 6.6) minutes. For the ten plumes studied in detail we can easily discern 123 individual events and Fig. 4 shows the derived apparent motions. The distribution of their velocities has a mean of 134 ( 14) km/s where the width of the distribution incorporates likely error in deducing the gradients in the x-t plots.

Figure 4: Distribution of jet velocities clearly visible in ten plumes characterized. The sample includes information derived from 123 individual jets (see, eg., Fig. 3).

Finally, very close inspection of the movie supporting Fig. 2 suggest the presence of a ubiquitous, very weak, fine scale, rapidly evolving, “mist” of upward propagating companions to the plumes that cover the entirety of the coronal hole limb. Unfortunately, the spatial resolution and compression of the STEREO spacecraft limit any precise diagnosis of this signal and we must wait for the higher signal-to-noise and spatial resolution images of the Solar Dynamics Observatory’s (SDO) Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) for further insight.

4 Discussion

We have observed weak, quasi-periodic, high-speed perturbations in several polar plumes observed by the STEREO spacecraft at range of temperatures from 0.6-1.5MK. These perturbations have very similar properties to those observed in active regions (McIntosh & De Pontieu, 2009a), coronal holes (De Pontieu et al., 2009; McIntosh, Leamon & De Pontieu, 2010), and quiet Sun (McIntosh & De Pontieu, 2009b). In each case, these perturbations have been connected spectroscopically to a strong upflowing, weak emission component at the magnetic footpoints. The spectroscopically determined upflows appear to be rooted in dynamic “Type-II” spicules in the upper chromosphere (De Pontieu et al., 2009; McIntosh & De Pontieu, 2009a). The overwhelming similarity between these results leads us to propose that the quasi-periodically forced jets observed in polar plumes have a similar cause and, as such, are responsible for loading a significant amount of heated (1MK) plasma into the fast solar wind along the open magnetic field lines (Parker, 1991), a hypothesis supported by high latitude Ulysses/SWOOPS observations (Yamauchi et al., 2003).

We observe the same types of jets for a wide range of temperatures, from 0.6 to 1.5 MK. Because the STEREO data are not taken exactly simultaneously, is not clear whether cool and hot jets co-occur within the same pixel. However, the analysis of McIntosh & De Pontieu (2009a) of co-located upflows for a wide range of temperatures, as well as observations of large-scale jets in coronal holes that appear in simultaneous observations at 140,000 and 630,000K (Scullion et al., 2009) suggest that these events may well be truly multi-thermal. Observations with SDO/AIA will shed light on this issue, one that has important implications for the driving mechanism of these jets although we expect that they are triggered by the complex interactions of the small scale magnetic flux elements at the base of the plume and its immediate surroundings (Gabriel et al., 2009; Heggland et al., 2009).

It is only appropriate to note that our interpretation in terms of field-directed, high-speed, quasi-periodically triggered, upflows is contrary to the widely held interpretation that this observational phenomena is due to compressive (slow-mode) magneto-acoustic waves traveling along the plumes (e.g., Deforest & Gurman, 1998; Ofman et al., 1999, 2000; Banerjee et al., 2000; Nakariakov, 2006; Banerjee et al., 2009). Unfortunately, the problem is ill-posed, and both interpretations are limited by the high inclination angles that polar plumes present relative to our typical line of sight on the Sun-Earth line. Further complications arise from: the commonality of the chromospheric Alfvén and coronal sound speeds (100 km/s); the weak density enhancements due to the upflow, or wave, passage that are largely lost in the lower part of the plume against the emission from the brighter core of the line, only becoming more prevalent as the background emission drops away exponentially with radial distance (Ofman et al., 1999); and issues persist as to why these objects can have such long “periods” relative to the typical timescales in the lower atmosphere of only a few minutes if the waves come from, or transit through, the lower atmosphere (see, e.g., McIntosh et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009). We suggest that efforts should be made to identify plumes in equatorial coronal holes where they can be studied spectroscopically, down their long axis, in order to check the properties of the line emission with the highest possible signal-to-noise. Such observations are planned using detailed Hinode SOT and EIS observations (using very deep exposures of the coolest lines in its wavelength range) with corresponding STEREO observations at the limb necessary to complete the connection of the plasma from the chromospheric to coronal domain as well as address the wave/upflow interpretation issue. We will investigate the temporal variability in the line core intensity, Doppler shift and broadening down the axis of the plume (studying the phase relationships between them as a wave diagnostic, e.g., Lites & Chipman, 1979), and check for the presence of blue-wing asymmetries (consistent with the presence of a spicule-related upflows De Pontieu et al., 2009). Of course, on disk, we will need to exploit new upper chromospheric diagnostics from SOT analyze the dynamic behavior (e.g., Rouppe van der Voort et al., 2009).

Should the observed phenomena be related to quasi-periodic mass-loading events it is natural to expect that the change in tension on that magnetic field line will also trigger a quasi-periodic Alfvén wave in the plume (see also Lites et al., 1999). This speculation is supported by the observational evidence of the ubiquitous (and significant) Alfvén wave flux carried by the Type-II spicules (De Pontieu et al., 2007b). Finally, we speculate that because the (Alfvén) phase speed of the waves is significantly higher than the field-aligned upflows, the mass on the field line can lead to ideal reflecting conditions for the formation of a turbulent cascade of the Alfvénic wave energy into the plasma that is needed to accelerate the wind (e.g., Velli, 1993; Matthaeus et al., 1999; Verdini et al., 2010). It is likely that precise spectroscopic imaging experiments (e.g., Tomczyk et al., 2007) must be made in polar regions to accurately investigate the propagation and magnitude of Alfvén waves in the plume and inter-plume regions.

5 Conclusion

We have studied several high cadence STEREO sequences of polar coronal holes at the limb. In all coronal passbands, we observe high speed jets of plasma traveling along the plume structures with a mean velocity of 135 km/s at a range of temperatures from 0.5-1.5 MK. These jets have an apparent brightness enhancement of 5% above that of the plumes they travel on and repeat quasi-periodically with repeat-times ranging from five to 25 minutes. These jets are remarkably similar in magnitude, periodicity and velocity to those observed in other magnetic regions of the solar atmosphere. They are multi-thermal in nature. Further, based on the previous results that motivated this study (De Pontieu et al., 2009; McIntosh & De Pontieu, 2009a, b), we speculate that these jets originate in the upper chromosphere and that their quasi-periodic nature can be a ready source of Alfvén waves and mass which can self-consistently form and accelerate the mass in the fast solar wind.

Acknowledgements.
We have benefited and are grateful for frequent discussions with Joe Gurman and Marco Velli. This work was started at a workshop in ISSI, Bern “Small-scale transient phenomena and their contribution to coronal heating”. NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. B.D.P., S.W.M., and R.J.L were supported by NASA grants NNX08AH45G, NNX08BA99G, and NNH08CC02C.

References

  • Banerjee et al. (2000) Banerjee, D., O’Shea, E., & Doyle, J. G. 2000, Sol. Phys., 196, 63
  • Banerjee et al. (2009) Banerjee, D., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, L29
  • DeForest et al (1997) DeForest, C. E., et al. 1997, Sol. Phys., 175, 393
  • Deforest & Gurman (1998) Deforest, C. E., & Gurman, J. B. 1998, ApJ, 501, L217
  • De Pontieu et al. (2007a) De Pontieu, B., et al. 2007a, PASJ, 59, 655
  • De Pontieu et al. (2009) De Pontieu, B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, L1
  • De Pontieu et al. (2007b) De Pontieu, B., et al. 2007b, Science, 318, 1574
  • Doschek et al. (2001) Doschek, G. A., et al.. 2001, ApJ, 546, 559
  • Gabriel et al. (2003) Gabriel, A. H., Bely-Dubau, F., & Lemaire, P. 2003, ApJ, 589, 623
  • Gabriel et al. (2009) Gabriel, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 551
  • Hassler et al. (1997) Hassler, D. M., et al.1997, Sol. Phys., 175, 375
  • Heggland et al. (2009) Heggland, L., et al., 2009, ApJ, 702, 1
  • Lites & Chipman (1979) Lites, B. W. & Chipman, E. G. 1979, ApJ, 231, 570
  • Lites et al. (1999) Lites, B. W., et al. 1999, Sol. Phys., 190, 185
  • Matthaeus et al. (1999) Matthaeus, W. H., et al. 1999, ApJ, 523, L93
  • Mazzotta et al. (1998) Mazzotta, P., et al., 1998, A&ASupp., 133, 403
  • McIntosh & Smillie (2004) McIntosh, S. W., & Smillie, D. G. 2004, ApJ, 604, 924
  • McIntosh et al. (2007) McIntosh, S. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 650
  • McIntosh et al. (2008) McIntosh, S. W., et al. 2008, Sol. Phys., 252, 321
  • McIntosh & De Pontieu (2009a) McIntosh, S. W., & De Pontieu, B. 2009, ApJ, 706, L80
  • McIntosh & De Pontieu (2009b) McIntosh, S. W., & De Pontieu, B. 2009, ApJ, 707, 524
  • McIntosh, Leamon & De Pontieu (2010) McIntosh, S. W., Leamon, R. J. & De Pontieu, B. 2010, ApJ(submitted November 2009)
  • Nakariakov (2006) Nakariakov, V. M. 2006, Phil. Trans. A, 364, 473
  • Newkirk & Harvey (1968) Newkirk, G. J., & Harvey, J. 1968, Sol. Phys., 3, 321
  • Ofman et al. (1999) Ofman, L., Nakariakov, V. M., & DeForest, C. E., 1999, ApJ, 514, 441
  • Ofman et al. (2000) Ofman, L., et al., 2000, ApJ, 529, 592
  • Parker (1991) Parker, E. N. 1991, ApJ, 372, 719
  • Rouppe van der Voort et al. (2009) Rouppe van der Voort, L., et al., 2009, ApJ, 705, 272
  • Schrijver et al. (1999) Schrijver, C. J., et al., 1999, Sol. Phys., 187, 261
  • Scullion et al. (2009) Scullion, E., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1385
  • Torrence & Compo (1998) Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. 1998, BAMS, 79, 61
  • Tomczyk et al. (2007) Tomczyk, S., et al. 2007, Science, 317, 1192
  • Velli (1993) Velli, M. 1993, A&A, 270, 304
  • Verdini et al. (2010) Verdini, A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, L116
  • Wang (1998) Wang, H. 1998, ApJ, 509, 461
  • Wang et al. (2009) Wang, T. J. et al. 2009, A&A, 503, L25
  • Wilhelm (2000) Wilhelm, K. 2000, A&A, 360, 351
  • Yamauchi et al. (2003) Yamauchi, Y., Suess, S. T., & Sakurai, T. 2003, Solar Wind Ten, 679, 255
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
58080
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description