(Sr{}_{3}Sc{}_{2}O{}_{5})Fe{}_{2}As{}_{2} as a possible parent compound for FeAs-based superconductors

(SrScO)FeAs as a possible parent compound for FeAs-based superconductors

Xiyu Zhu, Fei Han, Gang Mu, Bin Zeng, Peng Cheng, Bing Shen, and Hai-Hu Wen hhwen@aphy.iphy.ac.cn National Laboratory for Superconductivity, Institute of Physics and Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. O. Box 603, Beijing 100190, China
Abstract

A new compound with the FeAs-layers, namely (SrScO)FeAs (abbreviated as FeAs-32522), was successfully fabricated. It has a layered structure with the space group of I4/mmm, and with the lattice constants a = 4.069 and c = 26.876 . The in-plane Fe ions construct a square lattice which is close to that of other FeAs-based superconductors, such as REFeAsO (RE = rare earth elements) and (Ba,Sr)FeAs. However the inter FeAs-layer spacing in the new compound is greatly enlarged. The temperature dependence of resistivity exhibits a weak upturn in the low temperature region, but a metallic behavior was observed above about 60 K. The magnetic susceptibility shows also a non-monotonic behavior. Interestingly, the well-known resistivity anomaly which was discovered in all other parent compounds, such as REFeAsO, (Ba,Sr)FeAs and (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF and associated with the Spin-Density-Wave (SDW)/structural transition has not been found in the new system either on the resistivity data or the magnetization data. This could be induced by the large spacing distance between the FeAs-planes, therefore the antiferromagnetic correlation between the moments of Fe ions in neighboring FeAs-layers cannot be established. Alternatively it can also be attributed to the self-doping effect between Fe and Sc ions. The Hall coefficient is negative but strongly temperature dependent in wide temperature region, which indicates the dominance of electrical conduction by electron-like charge carriers and probably a multi-band effect or a spin related scattering effect. It is found that the magnetoresistance cannot be described by the Kohler’s rule, which gives further support to above arguments.

pacs:
74.70.Dd, 74.25.Fy, 75.30.Fv, 74.10.+v

I Introduction

Superconductivity in the FeAs-based systems has received tremendous attention in last several months with the hope that the superconducting transition temperature could be raised to a higher value.Kamihara2008 () Experimentally, it has been found that the highest is about 55-57 K in the fluorine doped REFeAsO compoundRenZA55K (); WangC () or RE doped (Ca,Sr)FeAsF (RE = rare earth elements).CP () Meanwhile the family of the FeAs-based superconductors has been expanded rapidly. In the system of (Ba,Sr)KFeAs (denoted as FeAs-122), the maximum T at about 38 K was discoveredBaKparent (); Rotter (); CWCh (). In the LiFeAs (denoted as FeAs-111) system, superconductivity at about 18 K was found.LiFeAs (); LiFeAsChu (); LiFeAsUK () In the material FeSe which has no toxic arsenic and a more simple structureWuMK (), it was shown that the sample became superconductive at about 8 K. By doping or using a high pressure, the T can be pushed higher. Superconductivity at about 2.2 K has also been found in a NiP-based layered structure LaNiOP with the inter growth of NiP-1111 and 122 building blocks.Cava () Very recently, another kind of parent compounds (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF were reported,Han (); Tegel (); HosonoSrFeAsF (); ZhuXYNatMat () which may lead to high temperature superconductors by doping charges into the system.

Empirically it is found that the superconducting transition temperature rises when the inter FeAs-layer spacing distance is increased (F-SmFeAsO: T=55 K, ; (Sr,Ba)KFeAs: T=38 K, ; LiFeAs: T=18 K, ) in the FeAs-based superconductors. Surprisingly this seems to be quite similar to the case in the cuprates. For example, by using the effective layers of CuO planes in the cuprates, superconductors with different structures were discovered. They can be categorized into the so-called single-layer systems LaSrCuO and BiSrCuO with the maximum T of about 38 K, or the double-layer systems YBaCuO and BiSrCaCuO with the optimal T of about 85-92 K, or the triple-layer system BiSrCaCuO with the maximum T of about 123 K (at ambient pressure).Cuprate () As inspired by the experience in the cuprate superconductors, a larger separation between the superconducting planes (here the FeAs layers) may lead to a higher . Thus it becomes very interesting to see whether it is possible to fabricate a compound with larger spacing distance between the FeAs-planes. In this paper, we report the discovery of another kind of FeAs-based layered compound (SrScO)FeAs (abbreviated as FeAs-32522), which has an inter FeAs-layer spacing distance of about 13.438, being much larger than those in all other parent compounds discovered so far, such as REFeAsO, FeAs-122, and (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF. The temperature dependence of resistivity, magnetization, Hall effect and magneto-resistance all exhibit quite similar behaviors as other parent compounds, but with the exception that the resistivity anomaly which was associated with the SDW/structural transitionDai () has not been found in present system up to 400 K. Superconductivity may be induced by doping electrons or holes in this new compound.

Ii Experiment

The compound SrScOFeAs was found while looking for iron arsenic analogs of materials with this structure type seen in related chemical systems.Kishio () The polycrystalline samples were fabricated by using a two-step solid state reaction methodXYZ (). Firstly, SrAs and ScAs powders were obtained by the chemical reaction method with Sr pieces, Sc pieces and As grains. Then they were mixed with ScO (purity 99.9%), SrO (purity 99%), FeO(purity 99.9%), and Fe powder (purity 99.9%) in the formula (SrScO)FeAs, grounded and pressed into a pellet shape. The weighing, mixing and pressing processes were performed in a glove box with a protective argon atmosphere (the HO and O contents are both below 0.1 PPM). The pellets were sealed in a quartz tube with 0.2 bar of Ar gas and followed by a heat treatment at 1000 C for 40 hours. Then it was cooled down slowly to room temperature.

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of our samples was carried out by a - MXP18A-HF equipment with scan. The XRD data taken using powder sample was analyzed by the Rietveld fitting method using the GSAS suiteGsAs (). The starting parameters for the fitting were taken from isostructural (SrScO)CuS and the program will finally find the best fitting parameters.Kishio () The dc magnetization measurements were done with a superconducting quantum interference device (Quantum Design, SQUID, MPMS7). For the magnetotransport measurements, the sample was shaped into a bar with the length of 3 mm, width of 2.5 mm and thickness of about 0.8 mm. The resistance and Hall effect data were collected using a six-probe technique on the Quantum Design instrument physical property measurement system (PPMS) with magnetic fields up to 9 T. The electric contacts were made using silver paste with the contacting resistance below 0.06 at room temperature. The data acquisition was done using a dc mode of the PPMS, which measures the voltage under an alternative dc current and the sample resistivity is obtained by averaging these signals at each temperature. In this way the contacting thermal power is naturally removed. The temperature stabilization was better than 0.1% and the resolution of the voltmeter was better than 10 nV.

Figure 1: (Color online) (Left) Crystal structure of (SrScO)FeAs. Now the FeAs layers are well separated by the building block SrScO. (Right) An enlarged view about the FeAs block on which four different angles are marked: : As-Fe-As (I), : As-Fe-As (II), : Fe-As-Fe (I) and : Fe-As-Fe (II).
Figure 2: (Color online) X-ray diffraction patterns and the Rietveld fit for the (SrScO)FeAs powder sample.

Iii Analysis to the structural data

The XRD pattern for the sample (SrScO)FeAs is shown in Fig. 2. One can see that the sample is very pure since no any visible peaks can be detected from the impurity phase. The data was well fitted with a single tetragonal (SrScO)FeAs phase with the space group of I4/mmm. Rietveld refinement shown by the solid line in the figure gives good agreement between the data and the calculated profiles. Lattice parameters for the tetragonal unit cell was determined to be a = 4.069 and c = 26.876 . In Table I, the structure parameters, angles of As-Fe-As and Fe-As-Fe (as marked in Fig.1) were listed with agreement factors: wR = 11.75, R= 8.09.

Atom site x y z B angle ()
Sc 4e 0 0 0.07399(12) 0.28(6)
Fe 4d 0.5 0 0.25 0.46(6)
Sr 2b 0.5 0.5 0 1.2(5)
Sr 4e 0.5 0.5 0.14006(6) 0.51(4)
As 4e 0 0 0.20018(6) 0.62(4)
O 8g 0.5 0 0.08323(23) 0.54(14)
O 2a 0 0 0 0.82(31)
Table 1: Fitting parameters, some angles () for (SrScO)FeAs. wR = 11.75, R= 8.09.

It is clear that the a-axis lattice constant of this parent phase is slightly larger than that of the REFeAsO, (Ba,Sr)FeAs and (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF systems, while the c-axis one is much larger.Kamihara2008 (); XYZ (); Canfield (); Han () The skeleton shown in the right hand side of Fig.1 gives the structure model of our sample. It is clear that the Fe ions construct a square lattice and the FeAs-layer stacks with the (SrScO) building block along c-axis. The spacing distance between two neighboring FeAs-layers of about 13.438 is much larger than those in all other FeAs-based compounds discovered so far, such as REFeAsO, (Ba,Sr)FeAs, and (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF. This may induce high superconductivity by doping charges into the system. In fact, this kind of structures were reported and classified to the general formula (CuS)(SrMO).Kishio ()

Figure 3: (Color online) (a) Temperature dependence of resistivity for the (SrScO)FeAs sample at zero field up to 400 K and 9 T up to 300 K. A clear upturn in the low temperature region can be seen. (b) Temperature dependence of dc magnetization for the zero field cooling (ZFC) process at a magnetic field of = 5000 Oe.

Iv Electrical and magnetic properties

In Fig.3 (a) we present the temperature dependence of resistivity for the (SrScO)FeAs sample under two magnetic fields 0 T and 9 T. The data under zero field were collected in temperature region up to 400 K. A weak upturn in the low-temperature regime can be seen under both fields, representing a weak semiconductor like behavior for the present sample. This behavior was attributed to the weak localization effect in our sample. Interestingly, the similar weak upturn of resistivity was observed in stoichiometric LaOFeP.CavaLaOFeP () A metallic behavior can be seen in the temperature dependence of resistivity in the temperature regime above 60 K in our sample. Surprisingly, no resistivity anomaly corresponding to the SDW transition was observed up to 400 K. This can be further confirmed by the magnetization data as shown in Fig.3 (b), which shows the zero field cooled dc magnetization at 5000 Oe. Again no anomaly was observed in the magnetization data. This is rather different from other FeAs-based parent compounds, such as REFeAsOKamihara2008 (), (Ba,Sr)FeAsBaKparent (); Rotter () and (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsFHan (), where clear resistivity and magnetization anomaly associated with the SDW/structral transition have been observed. We attribute it to the rather large spacing distance between the neighboring FeAS-layers in the present system, which prevents from forming the anti-ferromagnetic correlation between the moments of Fe ions in neighboring FeAs-layers.

Figure 4: (Color online) Temperature dependence of Hall coefficient determined on the sample (SrScO)FeAs. Negative values of and a strong temperature dependence can be seen. Inset: The raw data of the Hall resistivity versus the magnetic field at different temperatures.
Figure 5: (Color online) Field dependence of MR for the present sample at different temperatures is shown in the main frame. The inset shows the Kohler plot of MR. The MR is positive at a low field and turns to be negative at low temperatures.

To further understand the conducting carriers in the present sample, we also carried out the Hall effect measurements on the present sample. The inset of Fig. 4 shows the magnetic field dependence of Hall resistivity () at different temperatures. In the experiment, was taken as = [(+H) - (-H)]/2 at each point to eliminate the effect of the misaligned Hall electrodes. It is clear that is negative at all temperatures below 300 K for (SrScO)FeAs leading to a negative Hall coefficient =/H. This is similar to that of REFeAsOChengPPRB (); MandrusPRB () and (Ba,Sr)FeAs parent phases, but in sharp contrast with (Sr,Ca,Eu)FeAsF in which the positive Hall coefficient R was found. The temperature dependence of the Hall coefficient is presented in the main frame of Fig. 4. One can see that remains negative in wide temperature regime up to 300 K and the absolute value of decreases monotonically from 2 K to 300 K. This indicates that electron-type charge carriers dominate the conduction in the present sample. The strong temperature dependent behavior of the Hall coefficient suggests either a strong multi-band effect or a spin related scattering effect. The absolute value of is remarkably smaller than that of SrFeAsF system, indicating a relatively higher density of charge carriers.

The magnetoresistance (MR) is a very powerful tool to investigate the properties of electronic scattering.LiQ (); YangHall () Field dependence of MR for the present sample at different temperatures is shown in the main frame of Fig 5. One can see a systematic evolution of the curvature in the vs H curve, where , and represents the longitudinal resistivity at a magnetic field and that at zero field. The MR data at 2 K is positive with a hump shape below 2.3 T and becomes negative at higher fields. While at 5 K, a maximum value of MR appears at about 3.3 T and it decreases until becoming zero at 9 T. The data at 10 K have a downward curvature compared with that measured at higher temperatures. We attribute the complicated behavior at low temperatures, especially the negative MR effect at 2 K, to the Kondo effect which is associated very well with the upturn of resistivity or the magnetic susceptibility, or to the magnetic field induced delocalization effect. The semiclassical transport theory has predicted that the Kohler’s rule will be held if only one isotropic relaxation time is present in a solid state system.Kohler () The Kohler’s rule can be written as

(1)

This equation means that the vs curves for different temperatures, the so-called Kohler’s plot, should be scaled to a universal curve if the Kohler’s rule is obeyed. The scaling based on the Kohler plot of our sample is revealed in the inset of Fig.5. An obvious violation of the Kohler’s rule can be seen from this plot. This behavior may indicate a multi-band effect or a complicated scattering mechanism, like the Kondo effect or the weak localization in the low temperature region. This kind of upturn of resistivity and the magnetic susceptibility in the low temperature limit seem to be common features for the parent phases of the FeAs-based compounds and further studies are certainly required to unravel the underlying physics.

V Concluding remarks

In summary, a parent phase of the FeAs-based family, (SrScO)FeAs, with the space group of I4/mmm was synthesized successfully using a two-step solid state reaction method. Rather large spacing distance between the neighboring FeAs-layers was found. No anomaly associated with the AF order was observed either in the data of temperature dependence of resistivity or dc magnetization, which was attributed to the rather large spacing distance between the neighboring FeAs-layers. Strong Hall effect was observed in the temperature region up to 300 K. We found that the Hall coefficient is negative in the entire temperature regime. We also observed a delocalization effect at low temperatures from the MR data. The violation of the Kohler’s rule along with the strong temperature dependence of may suggest a multi-band and/or a spin scattering effect in this system. By doping electrons or holes in this new compound, superconductivity may be achieved.

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China, the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 project: 2006CB01000, 2006CB921802), the Knowledge Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (ITSNEM).

References

  • (1) Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008).
  • (2) Z. A. Ren, W. Lu, J. Yang, W. Yi, X. L. Shen, Z. C. Li, G. C. Che, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z. X. Zhao, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 2215 (2008).
  • (3) Cao Wang, Linjun Li, Shun Chi, Zengwei Zhu, Zhi Ren, Yuke Li, Yuetao Wang, Xiao Lin, Yongkang Luo, Shuai Jiang, Xiangfan Xu, Guanghan Cao, and Zhu’an Xu, Europhys. Lett. 83, 67006 (2008).
  • (4) Peng Cheng, Bing Shen, Gang Mu, Xiyu Zhu, Fei Han, Bin Zeng and Hai-Hu Wen, arXiv. condmat/0812. 1192.
  • (5) Marianne Rotter, Marcus Tegel, Inga Schellenberg, Wilfried Hermes, Rainer Pöttgen, and Dirk Johrendt, Phys. Rev. B 78, 020503(R) (2008).
  • (6) M. Rotter, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107006 (2008).
  • (7) K. Sasmal, B. Lv, B. Lorenz, A. M. Guloy, F. Chen, Y. Y. Xue, and C. W. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107007 (2008).
  • (8) X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, Y. X. Lv, W. B. Gao, L. X. Yang, R. C. Yu, F. Y. Li, and C. Q. Jin, Solid State Communications. 148, 538 (2008). ¡¡
  • (9) Joshua H. Tapp, Zhongjia Tang, Bing Lv, Kalyan Sasmal, Bernd Lorenz, Paul C.W. Chu, and Arnold M. Guloy, Phys. Rev. B 78, 060505(R) (2008).
  • (10) Michael J. Pitcher, Dinah R. Parker, Paul Adamson, Sebastian J. C. Herkelrath, Andrew T. Boothroyd, and Simon J. Clarke, Chem. Commun. 45, 5918-20 (2008).
  • (11) Fong-Chi Hsu, Jiu-Yong Luo, Kuo-Wei Yeh, Ta-Kun Chen, Tzu-Wen Huang, Phillip M. Wu, Yong-Chi Lee, Yi-Lin Huang, Yan-Yi Chu, Der-Chung Yan, and Maw-Kuen Wu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 14262-4 (2008).
  • (12) T. Klimczuk, T.M. McQueen3, A.J. Williams, Q. Huang, F. Ronning, E.D. Bauer, J.D. Thompson, M.A. Green, and R.J. Cava, arXiv. Condmat/0808.1557.
  • (13) Fei Han, Xiyu Zhu, Gang Mu, Peng Cheng, and Hai-Hu Wen, Phys. Rev. B 78, 180503(R) (2008).
  • (14) M. Tegel, S. Johansson, V. Weiss, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, R. Poettgen, and Dirk Johrendt, arXiv:cond-mat/0810.2120.
  • (15) S. Matsuishi, I. Yasunori, T. Nomura, H. Yanagi, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc (2008) in press.
  • (16) X. Y. Zhu, F. Han, P. Cheng, G. Mu, B. Shen, and H. H. Wen, arXiv:cond-mat/0810.2531.
  • (17) For the structures of different families of cuprate superconductors, see for example D. Hohlwein, Materials and Crystallographic Aspects of High-T Superconductivity, Edited by E. Kaldis, NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sciences - Vol. 263 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1994), p.16, and references therin.
  • (18) Clarina de la Cruz, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, Jiying Li, W. Ratcliff II, J. L. Zarestky, H. A. Mook, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, and Pengcheng Dai, Nature 453, 899-902 (2008).
  • (19) Kenji Otzschi, Hiraku Ogino, Jun-ichi Shimoyama, and Kohji Kishio, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 117, 729-733 (1999).
  • (20) Xiyu Zhu, Huan Yang, Lei Fang, Gang Mu, and Hai-Hu Wen, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 105001 (2008).
  • (21) AC Larson, RB Von Dreele, General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-748, 2000.
  • (22) N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, A. Kreyssig, S. Nandi, G. E. Rustan, A. I. Goldman, S. Gupta, J. D. Corbett, A. Kracher, and P. C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. B 78, 014507 (2008).
  • (23) T. M. McQueen, M. Regulacio, A. J. Williams, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, Y. S. Hor, D.V. West, M. A. Green, R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024521 (2008).
  • (24) Peng Cheng, Huan Yang, Ying Jia, Lei Fang, Xiyu Zhu, Gang Mu, Hai-Hu Wen, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134508 (2008).
  • (25) Athena S. Sefat, Michael A. McGuire, Brian C. Sales, Rongying Jin, Jane Y. Howe, David Mandrus, Phys. Rev. B 77, 174503 (2008).
  • (26) Q. Li, B. T. Liu, Y. F. Hu, J. Chen, H. Gao, L. Shan, H. H. Wen, A. V. Pogrebnyakov, J. M. Redwing, and X. X. Xi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 167003 (2006).
  • (27) H. Yang, Y. Liu, C. G. Zhuang, J. R. Shi, Y. G. Yao, S. Massidda, M. Monni, Y. Jia, X. X. Xi, Q. Li, Z. K. Liu, Q. R. Feng, H. H. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 067001 (2008).
  • (28) J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons, Classics Series (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
102038
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description