Spontaneous Photon Emission in Cavities

Spontaneous Photon Emission in Cavities

G. Alber Institut für Angewandte Physik, Technische Universität Darmstadt,D-64289, Germany    N. Trautmann Institut für Angewandte Physik, Technische Universität Darmstadt,D-64289, Germany
December 4, 2014
Abstract

We investigate spontaneous photon emission processes of two-level atoms in parabolic and ellipsoidal cavities thereby taking into account the full multimode scenario. In particular, we calculate the excitation probabilities of the atoms and the energy density of the resulting few-photon electromagnetic radiation field by using semiclassical methods for the description of the multimode scenario. Based on this approach photon path representations are developed for relevant transition probability amplitudes which are valid in the optical frequency regime where the dipole and the rotating-wave approximations apply. Comparisons with numerical results demonstrate the quality of these semiclassical results even in cases in which the wave length of a spontaneously emitted photon becomes comparable or even larger than characteristic length scales of the cavity. This is the dynamical regime in which diffraction effects become important so that geometric optical considerations are typically not applicable.

I Introduction

The investigation of resonant light-matter interaction has received considerable attention during the last decades and remarkable experimental progresses in this field has opened the door to whole new experimental opportunities Berman (1994); Walther et al. (2006); Haroche et al. (2006). These developments are not only interesting from a fundamental point of view but also from practical points of view for possible applications in the area of quantum information processing, for example. In this latter context methods for achieving an optimal transfer of quantum information between single photons (flying qubits) and elementary material systems (stationary qubits) over large distances by using the resonant strong coupling, as required for the realization of a quantum repeater, are of particular interest. Therefore, recently considerable efforts Goy et al. (1983); Meschede et al. (1985); McKeever et al. (2003) have been devoted to investigate the interaction of matter qubits with few modes of the radiation field within the framework of Jaynes-Cummings-Paul models Schleich (2001). Recent developments stimulated extensions of this work to extreme multimode scenarios or to scenarios involving structured continua of electromagnetic field modes which are characteristic for half open cavities of a parabolic shape Maiwald et al. (2009, 2012), for example.

In the following we review some of these recent research activities focusing on the resonant matter-field interaction of two-level atoms located around the focal point of a parabolic shaped cavity and generalize them to prolate ellipsoidal cavities which include parabolic cavities as limiting cases. A particularly interesting elementary quantum electrodynamical situation arises in a prolate ellipsoidal cavity if two two-level atoms are trapped in the two foci of this cavity and exchange a single photon which is emitted spontaneously by one of these two-level atoms.

Ii The quantum electrodynamical model

In our model we investigate the dynamics of identical two-level atoms with transition frequencies and dipole matrix elements . These two-level atoms are assumed to be situated in the focal points of a prolate elliptical cavity and to interact with the quantized radiation field inside this cavity. Furthermore, we assume that the sizes of the relevant electronic states two-level atoms are small compared to the wavelengths of the atomic transition so that the dipole approximation is applicable ( is the speed of light in vacuum.). Moreover, as we are considering atomic transitions in the optical frequency regime the relevant coupling (Rabi-) frequencies are small in comparison with so that the rotating-wave approximation is applicable. Thus, the quantum electrodynamical interaction between two-level atoms and the quantized electromagnetic field inside the cavity can be described by the Hamiltonian with , and with the dipole operator of the two-level atom . Thereby, the energies of the atomic ground states have been set equal to zero. In the Schrödinger picture the positive frequency part of the (transversal) electromagnetic field operator is given by

and denote the normalized transversal electric mode functions which fulfill the boundary conditions for an ideally conducting cavity.

Iii Mode functions of the cavity and their semiclassical approximation

For arbitrary boundary conditions the calculation of the mode functions is generally difficult. However, in cases in which the wave lengths of relevant field modes are small in comparison with all other length scales of the problems this task may be facilitated by semiclassical methods. In order to put the problem into perspective let us consider cases in which the dipole matrix elements of the atomic transitions are oriented along the symmetry axis, i.e. the z-axis, of a parabolic or ellipsoidal cavity. Thus, we can write . This symmetry can be exploited as it is possible to show that in these cases the only field modes which couple to the two-level atoms in the dipole approximation are of the form Moon and Eberle-Spencer (1961)

Thereby, are the symmetry adapted parabolic coordinates in the case of a parabolic cavity and the prolate ellipsoidal coordinates in the case of an ellipsoidal cavity. For a parabolic cavity the functions and turn out to be Coulomb functions and for an ellipsoidal cavity they turn out to be prolate spheroidal wave functions. In both cases we can use semiclassical methods to express the quantization conditions resulting from the boundary conditions of an ideally conducting wall, for example, semiclassically in a simple way by taking advantage of the separability of the Helmholtz equation in these coordinates. This way one obtains a single quantization function for one of the coordinates, say , in the case of a parabolic cavity and two quantization conditions in the case of an ellipsoidal cavity. Furthermore, these semiclassical methods are also well suited for normalizing these mode functions appropriately.

Iv Photon path representation of probability amplitudes

We can now use these results to calculate the time evolution of the system. Our Hamiltonian has the property that the number of excitations in the system (so ) is a conserved quantity. If we assume that initially only one two-level atom is in an excited state and that the field is in the vacuum state we know that for all later times the number of excitations in the system equals unity. This leads to the following ansatz for the wave function

in the case of two two-level atoms in the cavity. (The superscripts and refer to atoms and photons, respectively.) It is a straight forward task to generalize the following calculation to an arbitrary number of atoms. The Schrödinger equation leads to a coupled system of linear differential equations. In order to solve this system we apply the Laplace transform in order to obtain a system of linear algebraic equations. Due to basic properties of our Hamiltonian it is straight forward to eliminate the Laplace transforms of the photonic excitations ( denotes the parameter of the Laplace transform) in order to obtain a linear system of equation for and . This system of equations is given by

with

The functions encode all the properties of the cavity. It is a non trivial task to evaluate these functions because they are defined by an infinite sum over all modes which couple to the atomic dipoles. However, we can evaluate these functions with the help of the semiclassical methods developed previously. With these functions at hand we can solve the linear system of equations and apply the inverse Laplace transform in order to obtain expressions for the time evolution of the probability amplitudes of observing atoms and in the excited states, i.e. and . However, evaluating the inverse Laplace transform is still a non trivial task. For this purpose it is convenient to solve the linear system of equations by applying the Neumann series in order to obtain an infinite sum of simple expressions for and and then apply the inverse Laplace transform to each of these terms. The Neumann series is given by

Thereby, we have defined and denotes the spontaneous decay rate of each two-level system originating from spontaneous emission of a photon in free space, i.e. in the absence of any boundary conditions for the radiation field. Of course, at first sight it may appear as a major complication to apply the Neumann series in order to invert a 2 by 2 matrix. However, this expansion leads to a semiclassical photon path representation of the relevant probability amplitudes Milonni and Knight (1974); Alber et al. (2013) so that we are able to interpret each term of this expansion as a contribution of a photon path. Thereby, each photon path involves a sequence of spontaneous emission and absorption processes. In this expansion the functions encode the possible paths a photon can take to reach atom starting from atom . In case of a parabolic cavity we can perform the same calculations but instead of a two by two matrix of the functions we only have to consider the single term .

V Modification of the spontaneous decay rate by boundary conditions

We can use our results of the preceding chapter to calculate the influence of the Purcell effect Purcell (1946) on the spontaneous decay rate. In the pole or Weisskopf-Wigner Weisskopf and Wigner (1930) approximation the spontaneous decay rate of atom is given by Thus, for a parabolic cavity we obtain the result Alber et al. (2013)

with and with denoting the focal length of the parabola. Each summand in the expression for is connected with a possible photon path inside the cavity, i.e. with bouncing back and forth of a photon (counted by ) between the atom and the vertex of the parabola. These contributions to the decay rate are connected with diffraction effects which are suppressed for large values of . Similar but more complicated results are obtained for an ellipsoidal cavity. The main difference between both cases is that for an ellipsoidal cavity we obtain a double sum which can be traced back to the existence of two quantization conditions. Of course, the results for a parabolic cavity can be obtained from the more general results for an ellipsoidal cavity in the limit in which the distance between the two focal points tends to infinity. In figure 1 the semiclassical analytical results are compared with exact numerical results. This numerical comparison demonstrates the quality of the semiclassical results even in cases in which the wave length of the spontaneously emitted photon becomes comparable to the characteristic length scales inside the cavity. Thus, the previously discussed semiclassical approximation also enables us to investigate diffraction effects which become relevant for .

Figure 1: Scaled spontaneous decay rate as a function of the scaled focal length of the parabola: Numerically exact results (dots), semiclassical results (solid). We also indicate the free-space value as a horizontal line.
Figure 2: Atomic excitation probabilities for and (a) and (b). The excitation probability of atom () is represented by the blue (red) curve.

Vi Time evolution of atomic excitation probabilities

We can now investigate the time evolution of atomic excitations. In this chapter we are going to present results for a prolate ellipsoidal cavity. For this purpose we need some additional quantities for describing the cavity, namely the distance between the focal points and the shortest distance between one of the vertices and its closest focal point. In the following we concentrate on the regime of short wavelengths, i.e. , in order to obtain a simple picture of the dynamics. If we start with an initial excitation of atom 1 we observe a bouncing back and forth of the atomic excitation between the two atoms inside the cavity by exchange of a spontaneously emitted photon. The time the excitation needs to travel from one atom to another is given by . The corresponding behavior of the atomic excitation probabilities is depicted in figures 2 a and b. We observe that the probability of a successful transfer of the excitation to the second atom depends significantly on the shape of the cavity. If , i.e. the cavity is almost spherically symmetric, the excitation probabilities associated with repeated returns of a photon to an atom are significantly larger than for cases with . This can be observed by comparing the excitation probabilities depicted in figures 2 a) and 2 b). This phenomenon may be traced back to the fact that both atomic dipole matrix elements are oriented along the z-axis. In the case of the radiation field of the photon emitted spontaneously by the first atom has to propagate almost along the z-axis in order to approach atom . Therefore, its electrical field is almost perpendicular to the z-axis and its coupling to the dipole of atom 2 is small. As a consequence the excitation probability is also small. In the opposite limit of an almost spherically symmetric cavity such a confinement of the photonic wave packet along the symmetry axis due to the shape of the cavity does not occur and the excitation probabilities are larger.

Figure 3: Time evolution of the (normally ordered) energy density (in units of ) of a spontaneously emitted photon in a prolate ellipsoidal cavity: The parameters are and ; (a), (b), (c), and (d). The red dots indicate the focal points.

Vii Time evolution of the energy density of the electromagnetic radiation field

We can also calculate the energy density of the electromagnetic radiation field in the case by using multidimensional semiclassical methods Maslov and Fedoriuk (1981). Let us investigate the dynamics of a photonic wave packet which carries the excitation from one atom to the other inside a prolate ellipsoidal cavity. Similar to the bouncing back and forth in the time evolution of the atomic excitation probabilities we can observe a bouncing back and forth of the photonic wave packet in the cavity. The dynamics of repeated absorption and spontaneous emission events also leads to a change of the shape of the photonic wave packet. This process is illustrated in figures 3 a-d for the electromagnetic energy density of a single photon. The corresponding atomic excitation probabilities are depicted in figure 2 b. Figure 3 a illustrates the energy density produced by the spontaneous emission of a single photon. The cavity guides the one-photon wave packet to the second focus as illustrated in figure 3 b. Figure 3 c shows the wave packet directly after the interaction with the second atom. Figure 3 d illustrates the wave packet after its interaction with the first atom.

Viii Conclusion

We have investigated the dynamics of spontaneous photon emission of two-level systems in parabolic and prolate ellipsoidal cavities assuming that the atoms are situated in the focal points of these cavities. Our theoretical approach is based on treating the multimode aspects of this problem with the help of one-dimensional semiclassical methods by exploiting the separability of the relevant Helmholtz equation. This way we are able to improve straight forward multidimensional semiclassical approaches considerably. With the help of semiclassical photon path representations of relevant probability amplitudes we have explored the intricate dynamical interplay between spontaneous photon emission and absorption processes on the one hand and reflections of the photon wave packet at the boundary of the cavity on the other hand.

References

  • Berman (1994) P. Berman, ed., Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994).
  • Walther et al. (2006) H. Walther, H. et al., Prog. Phys. 69, 1325 (2006).
  • Haroche et al. (2006) S. Haroche et al.Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities and Photons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  • Goy et al. (1983) P. Goy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1903 (1983).
  • Meschede et al. (1985) D. Meschede et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 551 (1985).
  • McKeever et al. (2003) J. McKeever et al., Nature 425, 268 (2003).
  • Schleich (2001) W. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).
  • Maiwald et al. (2009) R. Maiwald et al., Nat. Phys. 5, 551 (2009).
  • Maiwald et al. (2012) R. Maiwald et al., Phys. Rev. A 86, 043431 (2012).
  • Moon and Eberle-Spencer (1961) P. Moon and D. Eberle-Spencer, Field Theory Handbook (Springer, Berlin, 1961).
  • Milonni and Knight (1974) P. W. Milonni and P. L. Knight, Phy. Rev. A 10, 1096 (1974).
  • Alber et al. (2013) G. Alber et al., Phy. Rev. A 88, 023825 (2013).
  • Purcell (1946) E. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
  • Weisskopf and Wigner (1930) V. Weisskopf and E. Wigner, Z. Physik 63, 54 (1930).
  • Maslov and Fedoriuk (1981) V. P. Maslov and M. V. Fedoriuk, Semi-Classical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
42334
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description