Spatially-resolved Dense Molecular Gas Excitation in the Nearby LIRG VV 114
We present high-resolution observations (02–15) of multiple dense gas tracers, HCN and HCO ( = 1–0, 3–2, and 4–3), HNC ( = 1–0), and CS ( = 7–6) lines, toward the nearby luminous infrared galaxy VV 114 with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. All lines are robustly detected at the central gaseous filamentary structure including the eastern nucleus and the Overlap region, the collision interface of the progenitors. We found that there is no correlation between star formation efficiency and dense gas fraction, indicating that the amount of dense gas does not simply control star formation in VV 114. We predict the presence of more turbulent and diffuse molecular gas clouds around the Overlap region compared to those at the nuclear region assuming a turbulence-regulated star formation model. The intracloud turbulence at the Overlap region might be excited by galaxy-merger-induced shocks, which also explains the enhancement of gas-phase CHOH abundance previously found there. We also present spatially resolved spectral line energy distributions of HCN and HCO for the first time, and derive excitation parameters by assuming optically-thin and local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) conditions. The LTE model revealed that warmer, HCO-poorer molecular gas medium is dominated around the eastern nucleus, harboring an AGN. The HCN abundance is remarkably flat (3.5 10) independently of the various environments within the filament of VV 114 (i.e., AGN, star formation, and shock).
Subject headings:galaxies: individual (VV 114) — galaxies: interactions — radio lines: galaxies
HCN and HCO are known to be excellent unbiased tracers of extragalactic dense molecular interstellar medium (ISM; e.g., Papadopoulos, 2007; Shirley, 2015). Rotational transitions of HCN have high optically-thin critical densities () of 10 cm, 10 cm, and 10 cm at the = 1–0, 3–2, and 4–3 transitions, respectively, when assuming collisional excitation with H and a kinetic temperature of 20 K. Rotational transitions of HCO, a molecular ion, also have high optically-thin of 10 cm, 10 cm, and 10 cm at = 1–0, 3–2, and 4–3, respectively. A tight linear correlation in log scale between far-infrared luminosity, (or star formation rate, SFR), and luminosity of HCN or HCO lines, (or dense gas mass, ) was found in nearby spiral galaxies and (ultra-)luminous infrared galaxies (U/LIRGs) (e.g., Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b; Graciá-Carpio et al., 2008; García-Burillo et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2014; Privon et al., 2015; Usero et al., 2015; Stephens et al., 2016), suggesting that galaxies have a nearly constant SFR per (i.e., a constant dense gas star formation efficiency; SFE). Even if including local star-forming clouds, the relation is still almost linear (e.g., Shimajiri et al., 2017). Numerical simulations succeeded in reproducing such a linear correlation between log and log (e.g., Narayanan et al., 2008). However, Michiyama et al. (2016) found a super-linear relation using CO ( = 3–2) line in gas-rich merging galaxies (hereafter CO(3–2) line).
For multiple CO transitions in U/LIRGs, Greve et al. (2014) found a decreasing trend of the - index as increases at least up to = 13–12, which can be explained by a substantial contribution of additional warm and dense gas components to the higher- line luminosities possibly (mechanically) heated by supernovae, stellar winds and/or active galactic nucleus (AGN) outflow (see also Kamenetzky et al., 2016). On the other hand, the relatively weaker intensities of HCN and HCO transitions make it harder in general to study such dependence for these dense gas tracers for individual galaxies (and from region to region).
Contrary to the analysis of excitation conditions of some molecular species (mostly CO), molecular line intensity ratios between different species have been broadly studied for nearby starburst galaxies and U/LIRGs (Aalto, 2013, and references therein). Some ratios of bright molecular lines have been proposed to be used to diagnose physical and chemical processes involved in starburst and AGN hidden inside the dusty nuclear regions (e.g., CO/CO, HCN/CO, HCN/HCO, HCN/HNC, CN/HCN; Aalto et al., 1991; Kohno et al., 2001; Aalto et al., 2002; Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b; Meier & Turner, 2005; Costagliola et al., 2013). In particular, the HCN/HCO line intensity ratios for a given ( 5) are among the most established diagnostic tracers of AGN in mm and sub-mm wavelengths, and observational case studies of the ratios have been published for some bright galaxies (Kohno et al., 2001; Kohno, 2005; Graciá-Carpio et al., 2006; Imanishi et al., 2007, 2016a, 2016b, 2016c, 2018; Knudsen et al., 2007; Papadopoulos, 2007; Krips et al., 2008; Costagliola et al., 2011; Hsieh et al., 2012; Imanishi & Nakanishi, 2013a, b, 2014; Iono et al., 2013; Izumi et al., 2013, 2015, 2016; García-Burillo et al., 2014; Aalto et al., 2015a; Aladro et al., 2015; Martín et al., 2015; Saito et al., 2015; Schirm et al., 2016; Ueda et al., 2016; Espada et al., 2017; Salak et al., 2018). A few observational and theoretical studies address the excitation state of both molecules (e.g., Krips et al., 2008; Meijerink et al., 2011; Izumi et al., 2013; Papadopoulos et al., 2014; Spilker et al., 2014; Kazandjian et al., 2015; Tunnard et al., 2015).
Understanding the excitation conditions of the dense molecular gas is a natural step to investigate the relation between dense gas, star formation, and AGN. U/LIRGs are ideal sources to study the excitation of the HCN and HCO lines because the high suggests that dense material is abundant near the nuclear region of these galaxies, and even the high- transitions of dense gas tracers can be detected with relatively short integration times. Accordingly, we have used ALMA in the past years to study the dense gas in the merging galaxy VV 114 (Iono et al. 2013; Saito et al. 2015, 2017a, but see also previous studies with other interferometers, Yun et al. 1994; Iono et al. 2004a; Wilson et al. 2008; Sliwa et al. 2013).
The IR-bright mid-stage merger VV 114 ( = 87 Mpc, = 10 , 1″= 420 pc; Armus et al., 2009) is an intriguing system especially for the HCN and HCO lines. Figure 1a shows the ALMA CO (1–0) image (15 resolution) of VV 114 overlaid on the stellar light taken by HST/ACS F814W (Saito et al., 2015). The CO emission mainly comes from the central part of VV 114, and the peaks do not coincide with the K-band nuclei (shown as magenta crosses in Figure 1). The dense gas in VV 114 was first imaged in the HCN (1–0) and HCO (1–0) lines with Nobeyama Millimeter Array (5–7″resolution; Imanishi et al., 2007). The HCN (1–0)/HCO (1–0) flux density ratio is higher than 1.6 at the eastern galaxy. Iono et al. (2013) identified a compact (unresolved by 05 resolution), broad (290 km s) component in HCN (4–3) and HCO (4–3) lines at the eastern nucleus indicating the presence of a massive object there (4 10 ). The unresolved massive object (E0) and the brightest dense gas clump (E1) identified by Iono et al. (2013) coincide with the two strongest K-band peaks at the eastern nucleus (Scoville et al., 2000; Tateuchi et al., 2015) This unresolved component was also detected by using Submillimeter Array observations of the HCO (4–3) line (Wilson et al., 2008). The HCN (4–3)/HCO (4–3) line ratio at the eastern nucleus was higher than unity, whereas other star-forming dense gas clumps along the central kpc-scale filament of VV 114 showed lower values ( 1). Combining this information with the observed characteristics in other wavelengths (e.g., Paschen and hard X-ray; Grimes et al., 2006; Tateuchi et al., 2015), Iono et al. (2013) suggested that the eastern nucleus of VV 114 may harbor a dusty AGN (see Figure 2), which coincides with a hard X-ray point source (Grimes et al., 2006). Contrary to the eastern nuclei, through our followup CHOH observations (Saito et al., 2017a) we found that the Overlap region, which is located between the progenitor’s disks of the VV 114 system (i.e., the western side of the kpc-scale filament), is affected by merger-induced shocks. In summary, VV 114 has three distinctive regions that are expected to show different dense gas excitation and/or chemistry, i.e., the X-ray-bright AGN, starburst regions, and the shocked Overlap, and thus it is a good target to study the properties of dense gas ISM under different environments in a LIRG. VV 114 is known as the closest analogue of high-z Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) due to its FUV characteristics (Grimes et al., 2006). Since LBGs are thought to constitute a substantial fraction of star-forming galaxies during 2 z 6 (Peacock et al., 2000), it is also important to inspect the ISM properties in objects such as VV 114 in order to understand the onset of star formation at high redshift.
This Paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes a brief summary of our ALMA observations toward VV 114 and the procedure of data reduction. All HCN and HCO lines and continuum images are presented in Section 3. Then, we present beam- and -matched line ratio images in Section 4. In Section 5, we discuss the dense gas–FIR luminosity relations and their dependences (Section 5.1), star-forming activities using SFEs and dense gas fractions (Section 5.2) and its modeling (Section 5.3), line ratios against SFR (Section 5.4), and the physical properties of dense gas using a radiative transfer model (Section 5.5). Finally, we summarize our main findings in Section 6. We have adopted H = 70 km s Mpc, = 0.3, and = 0.7 throughout this Paper.
2. Observations and Data Reduction
2.1. Cycle 2 ALMA: J = 1–0
The Band 3 line survey toward VV 114 was carried out during the ALMA cycle 2 period (ID: 2013.1.01057.S, PI: T. Saito). Although the aim of this project was an unbiased line survey (84–111 GHz and 127–154 GHz) to study the chemistry in the filament of VV 114, here we only present two tunings which include the bright dense gas tracers, HCN (1–0) ( = 86.88826 GHz), HCO (1–0) ( = 87.43399 GHz), and the ground transition of an isomer of hydrogen cyanide, HNC (1–0), ( = 88.88001 GHz) lines. The full description of this project will be provided in a forthcoming paper.
A tuning (B3–1) covers the HCN (1–0) and HCO (1–0) lines in the lower sideband, and another tuning (B3–2) also covers the HNC (1–0) line in the lower sideband. B3-1 (B3–2) was obtained on 2014 June 17, July 2, 2015 June 4, and 5 (2014 July 3) with a single-sideband system temperature () of 38–90 K (33–78 K). The antenna configuration for B3–1 (B3–2) had thirty to thirty-eight (thirty-one) 12 m antennas, with a projected baseline length () of 18–780 m (19–650 m), which corresponds to a maximum recoverable scale (MRS; Lundgren et al., 2013) of 22″. Each tuning had four spectral windows (spws) to cover both sidebands. Each spw had a bandwidth of 1.875 GHz and 1.938 MHz resolution. The total on-source time of B3–1 (B3–2) was 47.4 minutes (23.7 minutes). The field of view (FoV) of Band 3 covers most of the extended CO (1–0) emission (Figure 1a). Neptune or Uranus were used as flux calibrators, while J0137–2430 or J2258–2758 were used as bandpass calibrators for both tunings. J0110–0741 or J0116–2052 were observed as phase calibrators.
2.2. Cycle 3 ALMA: J = 3–2
Band 6 observations toward VV 114 were carried out during the ALMA cycle 3 period (ID: 2015.1.00973.S, PI: T. Saito). The upper sideband was tuned to cover the HCN (3–2) and HCO (3–2) lines. The data was obtained on 2016 May 23 with of 62–180 K. The assigned configuration had thirty-seven 12 m antennas with of 16.7–641.5 m (MRS 9″). Each tuning had four spws to cover both sidebands. Two of the spws including the target lines had a bandwidth of 1.875 GHz with 7.812 MHz resolution, whereas the other two have a bandwidth of 2.000 GHz with 15.625 MHz resolution. The total on-source time was 30.4 minutes. The FoV of Band 6 covers all structures found in the HCO (1–0) (Figure 1b). Pallas, J0006–0623, J0118–2141 were used as the flux, bandpass, and phase calibrators, respectively. However, we estimate the absolute flux scaling factor using the bandpass calibrator, because the visibility model of asteroids in CASA is not reliable currently (see Section 2.4).
2.3. Cycle 2 ALMA: J = 4–3
VV 114 was observed with the long baseline mode of cycle 2 ALMA at Band 7 (ID: 2013.1.00740.S, PI: T. Saito). The field and frequency setups of the long baseline observations are the same as for our previous HCN (4–3) and HCO (4–3) observations with ALMA (Iono et al., 2013; Saito et al., 2015) except for the channel width (976.562 kHz for this Cycle 2 data). The lower sideband was tuned to cover the CS (7–6) line. The data were obtained on 2015 June 28 (B7–1) and July 18 (B7–2) with of 75–205 and 90–310 K, respectively. The assigned array configuration of B7–1 and B7–2 had fourty-one 12 m antennas with of 43.3 m–1.6 km and thirty-eight 12 m antennas with of 15.1 m–1.6 km, respectively. The combined data has MRS of 7″. Each tuning has four spws to cover both sidebands. All spws have a bandwidth of 1.875 GHz with 976.562 kHz resolution. The total on-source time of each data is 41.2 minutes. J2258-279, J2348-1631, and J0132-1654 were used as the flux, bandpass, and phase calibrators for both data, respectively.
2.4. Data Reduction
Processing the new Band 3, Band 6, and Band 7 data, including calibration and imaging, was done using CASA version 4.2.2, 4.5.3, and 4.2.2, respectively (McMullin et al., 2007). Images were reconstructed with the natural (robust = 2.0) or briggs (robust = 0.5) weighting. We made the data cubes with a velocity resolution of 20, 30, or 50 km s depending on achieved noise rms and signal-to-noise ratio of the target lines. Continuum emission was subtracted in the -plane by fitting the line free channels in both USB and LSB with a first order polynomial function. The line-free channels were used to make a continuum image using the multi-frequency synthesis method. Imaging properties, including flux density and recovered flux (i.e., ALMA interferometric flux relative to flux measured by a single-dish telescope), are listed in Table 1. We roughly recovered half of the total fluxes measured by single dish telescopes. All images shown in this Paper, except for line ratios, are not corrected for primary beam attenuation.
We use HCN (4–3) and HCO (4–3) data taken in ALMA cycle 0 (ID: 2011.0.00467.S, PI: D. Iono; Iono et al., 2013; Saito et al., 2015), and combine them with the cycle 2 data (Section 2.3).
In those previous papers, we carried out the absolute flux calibrations with the Butler-Horizons-2010 (BH10) models.
However, the flux models were updated, the so-called Butler-JPL-Horizons 2012 (BJH12), so we corrected the previous HCN (4–3) and HCO (4–3) fluxes using the new models following the description in the CASA guides111https://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php/SolarSystemModelsinCASA4.0.
The flux calibrator used for the cycle 0 data was Uranus, and the difference of the “zero-spacing” flux density of Uranus between the models (i.e., BJH2012/BH2010 - 1) at 349 GHz is +0.03.
Therefore, we multiplied the flux densities of the cycle 0 data by 1.03 before combination.
Furthermore, we used the CASA task statwt222https://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php/DataWeightsAndComb
ination to recalculate the visibility weights of the cycle 0 data.
The systematic error on the absolute flux scaling factor using a solar system object is 5% for the Band 3 data (Lundgren et al., 2013). As described in Section 2.2, we used the bandpass calibrator as the flux calibrator for the Band 6 data in order to avoid using the unreliable flux model of Pallas. Using the ALMA Calibrator Source Catalogue333https://almascience.nao.ac.jp/sc/, the flux uncertainty of J0006-0623 at 260 GHz on 2016 May 23 is estimated to be 7.9%. This was estimated by fitting the monitored measurement at 91.5, 103.5 and 343.5 GHz on 2016 May 25 using , where is the flux density, is the observed frequency, and is the spectral index. The derived of J0006-0623 is -0.48 0.01. Therefore, we adopt a flux uncertainty of the Band 6 data as 8% throughout this Paper. Since the flux uncertainties of J2258–279 at 343.5 GHz (i.e., new Band 7 data) on 2015 June 29 and July 20 are 7.7% and 15.4%, respectively, we adopt the flux uncertainty of 15% for the Band 7 data.
If flux measurements for our bandpass and phase calibrators in less than a week from the observing date are available in the catalogue, we check the validity of the absolute flux calibrations using their fluxes for each spw. For the B3–1 data, the observed fluxes and the monitored values of J0116–2052 and J2258–2758 are consistent ( 9%). For the B3–2 data, the flux differences of J0116–2052 are less than 6%. The flux differences of J0118–2141, which was used for the Band 6 observation, are less than 30%. This is a relatively large value probably because uncertain flux interpolation between Band 3 and Band 7. The calibrators and check source observed in the Band 7 data were not monitored within 154 days from our observing dates.
MRS of each data is different due to the differences of the observed frequency and the minimum . When we discuss line ratios between data which have different MRS, we clipped all visibility data inside 18 in order to achieve a similar MRS, which allows us to minimize different missing flux effects. Beam convolution to 15 is also performed after -clipping.
The 254 GHz (Band 6) and 350 GHz (Band 7) continuum images are shown in Figures 3a and 3b, respectively. The total flux of VV 114 at 260 GHz and 350 GHz are 17.4 1.4 mJy and 44.7 6.7 mJy, respectively. Their overall spatial distributions along the filament across VV 114 coincide with each other and also with previous 340 GHz (i.e., dust emission mostly) continuum images (Wilson et al., 2008; Saito et al., 2015). They also agree with the low-resolution 110 GHz (i.e., mostly free-free) (Saito et al., 2015) and the 1.4 GHz (i.e., synchrotron) radio continuum image (Yun et al., 1994). The filamentary structure consists of a dozen of clumps. The easternmost point-like source in the filament coincides with the putative AGN (Iono et al., 2013).
The integrated intensity, velocity field, and velocity dispersion images of all transitions are shown in Figures 4, 5, and 6. All lines are mainly detected at the central filamentary structure which was identified in many molecular lines as well as ionized gas tracers (Tateuchi et al., 2015), indicating a site of intense star formation, as already seen in the radio-to-FIR continuum emissions. The filament consists of three main blobs located at the eastern nucleus, which may harbor a putative AGN (E0, see Figure 2) and starbursting clumps (E1), and between the progenitor’s disks (“Overlap” region). For a given , the HCO emission is more extended and brighter than the HCN emission. HNC (1–0) has two peaks, one at E0 and the another at E1 (see also Section 3.2). Although the clumps in the eastern galaxy reported by Iono et al. (2013) are clearly resolved in the Band 6 and Band 7 data, they are only marginally resolved in the Band 3 data due to the coarser beam size. The velocity field and dispersion maps are similar to those of the filament obtained in the CO (1–0) and CO (1–0) lines (Saito et al., 2015). The largest velocity dispersion is found around the Overlap region, except for the HNC (1–0) and HCN (3–2) images. The widest velocity dispersion is found around the Overlap region in the HCN (1–0), HCO (1–0), and HCO (3–2) images (Figures 4c, 4f, and 5f). As clearly seen in the velocity field of HCO (3–2) (Figure 5f), the wide dispersion ( 100 km s) is explained by the superposition of the eastern redshifted component and the central blueshifted component (i.e., a double-peaked profile), not due to the intrinsic velocity dispersion of molecular gas clumps there. We use eleven 30 (1.2 kpc in diameter) apertures along the filament of VV 114 as in Saito et al. (2017a) in order to measure the fluxes of the lines and continuum emission (See Figure 1b inset), which are then used for the estimates of molecular gas surface density (). The same apertures were adopted to estimate star formation rate surface densities () (Saito et al., 2017a). The measured fluxes are listed in Table 2.
3.1. Clumpy Dense Gas Filament across VV 114
The 80 pc resolution images of HCN (4–3) and HCO (4–3) emission (Figure 6) clearly show clumpy dense gas structures along the filament. The HCO filament has a total length of 6 kpc and a width of 200 pc, and consists of a dozen of giant molecular clouds (GMCs), most of which coincide with the 350 GHz continuum peaks (Figures 3b and 3d). Such morphological characteristics, together with the enhanced abundance of a molecular gas shock tracer, CHOH, found at the Overlap region (Saito et al., 2017a), share strong similarities with theoretical prediction that a colliding gas-rich galaxy pair forms a filamentary structure at the collision interface (i.e., shock front) between the progenitor’s disks (e.g., Saitoh et al., 2009; Teyssier et al., 2010).
3.2. The Eastern Nucleus
We show zoom-up images of line and continuum emission around the eastern nucleus in Figure 7. Except for the coarse resolution Band 3 data, the nuclear region is resolved into multiple clumps. However, most clumps are not resolved even by the 80 pc beam of the Band 7 data. All line peaks roughly coincide with the 350 GHz continuum peaks, indicating that cold dust grains around the nuclear region are concomitant with dense molecular ISM with 80 pc scale. In VV 114, the spatial coincidence between dense gas and dust emission is seen from kpc-scale to 80 pc-scale.
Although the Band 7 data provide the highest angular resolution image of molecular line toward VV 114 up to date, the HCN (4–3), HCO (4–3), and 350 GHz continuum images cannot resolve molecular gas structures around the putative AGN, which gives a size upper limit of 80 pc in diameter. The AGN core also shows bright CS (7–6) emission (Figure 8), which was tentatively detected previously (Saito et al., 2015). Assuming that at the AGN position of all images there is a negligible flux contribution from surrounding star-forming clumps, we measure line and continuum fluxes for the easternmost 350 GHz peak of the filament at (, ) = (010747.60, -17°30′2452), and regard it as molecular ISM which might be dominantly affected by the putative AGN of VV 114. We measured integrated fluxes at E0 (AGN), as well as E1 (a dense clump at 15 southwest from E0), as defined by Iono et al. (2013), and listed them in Table 3. Fluxes at E1 might be strongly contaminated by other clumps in the Bands 3 and 6 images, so we only measure line and continuum fluxes in Band 7. Spectra of all bands toward the AGN position are shown in Figure 9. All lines show broad Gaussian-like profile (FWHM 200 km s), indicating a large dynamical mass of of 9.3 10 assuming the inclination of 90°for simplicity.
3.3. Vibrationally-excited HCN Lines
Our frequency coverage contains two vibrationally-excited rotational transitions of HCN, i.e., = 3–2, = 1 at = 267.1993 GHz ( = 261.94 GHz) and = 4–3, = 1 at = 356.2556 GHz ( = 349.25 GHz). Those vibrationally-excited HCN lines have been frequently observed toward obscured nuclei in nearby (U)LIRGs (e.g., Sakamoto et al., 2010, 2013; Aalto et al., 2015b; Imanishi et al., 2016b, 2017), and thus they might be detectable toward the putative AGN in VV 114 (E0). Since the critical densities of those vibrationally-excited HCN lines exceed 10 cm, it is not easy to excite HCN molecules to a high vibrational states only by collisions. Instead, radiative excitation, in particular infrared radiation is required to explain detections of the vibrationally-excited HCN lines, and thus those lines are excellent tracers of hot, obscured nuclei in galaxies.
As shown in Figure 9, there is no statistically significant feature at these two frequencies. The 3 upper limit of HCN ( = 3–2, = 1) and HCN ( = 4–3, = 1) are 0.26 Jy km s and 0.26 Jy km s, respectively, assuming FWHM = 200 km s, which is the observed linewidth of HCN (4–3) and HCN (3–2) at E0. The observed flux ratios between = 1 and = 0 are then 0.15 for = 3–2 and 0.16 for = 4–3. If compared with the deeply obscured LIRG NGC 4418, which shows 0.17 and 0.23 for = 3–2 and = 4–3, respectively (Sakamoto et al., 2010), the AGN in VV 114 has weaker = 1 fluxes normalized by = 0 fluxes.
4. Line Ratios
In this Section, we used the -clipped and beam-convolved images to construct line ratio images.
4.1. Excitation Ratios
The excitation of dense molecular gas in galaxies has been investigated for local galaxies, bright high-z systems, and, in particular, their bright nuclei (Krips et al., 2008; Izumi et al., 2013; Papadopoulos et al., 2014; Spilker et al., 2014; Tunnard et al., 2015), although its spatial variation in LIRGs has not been studied in detail due to the faintness of dense gas tracers. Here we show spatially-resolved HCN (–)/HCN (1–0) line ratios and HCO (–)/HCO (1–0) line ratios (hereafter HCN or HCO excitation ratios) for a LIRG for the first time (Figure 10). All excitation ratios are made before clipping the inner -coverage (see Section 2.4) and convolving to 15 resolution (600 pc). The HCN (HCO) excitation ratios are masked to the region delimited by the HCN (1–0) (HCO (1–0)) integrated intensity level at 0.095 (0.153) Jy beam km s because it corresponds to 3 levels in the convolved integrated intensity maps.
The overall spatial distributions of the HCN and HCO excitation ratios in VV 114 are coincident with each other. In all cases, the peak is located at the eastern part of the filament. All excitation ratios do not exceed the optically-thick thermalized value (unity when using K km s units) anywhere. The highly-excited region at the eastern nucleus extends from northeast to southwest, and coincides with the HNC (1–0) distribution (Figure 7a). The Overlap region is also relatively excited, but a few times lower than the ratios around the eastern nucleus. The excitation of diffuse molecular gas phase traced by lower- CO or CO excitation ratios (Sliwa et al., 2013; Saito et al., 2015) shows a similar distribution along the filament with a peak at the eastern edge, indicating that the heating source of the diffuse gas is similar to that of the dense gas.
4.2. Hcn/hco Ratios
Contrary to the excitation ratios, intensity ratios between HCN and HCO for a given have been studied to characterize obscured nuclear regions (i.e., AGN or starburst), although HCN/HCO ratios at multiple are not broadly studied, except for some nearby bright galaxies (Krips et al., 2008; Izumi et al., 2013), because of the line weakness and the instrumental limitations. Using the high quality data of multiple HCN and HCO transitions taken for VV 114, we made HCN/HCO ratio images at = 1–0, 3–2, and 4–3 as shown in Figures 11a, 11b, and 11c, respectively. Here we used integrated intensity images without correcting the primary beam attenuation, smoothing the synthesized beam, and -clipping, because the antenna configurations are virtually identical for HCN and HCO at a given (Table 1).
All HCN/HCO ratio images show the highest peak (1.5) at the putative AGN position (E0) despite of the different resolutions. The second peak is located at 15 southwest of the AGN position, which coincides with a strong peak found in all images shown in Figure 7 (i.e., star-forming dense clumps). The second peak value varies from 0.7 to 0.45 as increases. The Overlap region shows relatively high values of 0.4 independently of . In terms of multiple HCN and HCO line ratios, VV 114, therefore, has three distinctive regions, AGN, star-forming clump(s), and Overlap region, which in turn shows the kpc-scale variation of dense gas excitation and chemistry along the filament. The higher HCN/HCO ratios only near the putative AGN position is consistent with previous studies (García-Burillo et al., 2014; Viti et al., 2014; Imanishi et al., 2016c, and references therein). Note that recent high angular resolution observations of HCN and HCO lines revealed (e.g., Martín et al., 2015; Espada et al., 2017; Salak et al., 2018) that the HCN/HCO ratios show a variety of spatial variations within circumnuclear disks.
4.3. HNC/HCN and HCN/CS Ratio
We detected HNC (1–0) and CS (7–6) lines toward the AGN position. The HNC (1–0)/HCN (1–0) line ratio at E0 is 0.85 0.23, indicating a comparable strength of HNC to HCN at the AGN position. When using 30 apertures (Figure 1b), Region 3 shows an HNC (1–0)/HCN (1–0) ratio of 0.25 ( 0.4 for other positions). The AGN position shows significantly brighter HNC luminosity relative to other molecular regions in VV 114. HNC/HCN 1 is seen in active nuclei (e.g., Huettemeister et al. 1995; Aalto et al. 2002; Pérez-Beaupuits et al. 2007; Costagliola et al. 2011; Aladro et al. 2015, see also Aalto et al. 2007 for = 3–2 transition). HCN (4–3)/CS (7–6) line ratio is suggested to be a diagnostic tracer of AGN activity when combining with the HCN (4–3)/HCO (4–3) line ratio (e.g. Izumi et al., 2016). The HCN (4–3)/CS (7–6) ratio is 4.9 1.3 at the AGN position of VV 114 (E0). The AGN may have a lower ratio than those in the other regions because it is similar to the lowest 3 lower limit (5.2) of all the other apertures. On the submillimeter-HCN diagram using HCN (4–3)/HCO (4–3) and HCN (4–3)/CS (7–6) ratios (Izumi et al., 2016), E0 is similar to NGC 4418 (Sakamoto et al., 2013) and IRAS12127–1412 (Imanishi & Nakanishi, 2014), both of which may harbor a dust-obscured AGN.
Recent observations have revealed a variety of excitation conditions in dense gas ISM from galaxy to galaxy by comparing HCN and HCO spectral line energy distribution (SLED) (e.g., Rangwala et al., 2011; Papadopoulos et al., 2014). In Figure 12a and 12b we show spatially-resolved HCN and HCO SLEDs, respectively, for the first time in this source, using the eleven apertures (Regions 1-11) and data at the AGN position (E0). The HCO SLEDs of VV 114, in general, tend to show larger values relative to the HCN SLEDs at a given . Both SLEDs for Region 1-3 and E0 peak at 3, whereas those for Region 4-11 (i.e., Overlap) peak at 3. On the other hand, Region 1 (and E0) only show high values ( 1) in HCN/HCO ratios (Figure 12c). The shape of the HCN/HCO ratio with (hereafter HCN/HCO ratio SLED) at E0 is remarkably flat and higher than unity, indicating a specific gas condition relative to other regions. Since those spatially-resolved SLEDs depend on the variety of thermal and chemical processes in ISM along the filament, we model those in Section 5.5 to discuss driving mechanisms.
5.1. L – L Relation and Slope – J Dependence
Our HCN and HCO data have a similar beam size for a given , sensitivity, and maximum recoverable scale, allowing us to probe the dense gas – star-forming scaling relation without systematic errors to derive fluxes of the dense gas tracers. In this Paper, we use the SFR surface density () based on 110 GHz continuum emission (see Saito et al., 2017a), and HCN and HCO flux densities as a proxy of and , respectively. Here we assumed that free-free (bremsstrahlung) emission dominates the 110 GHz continuum emission, and used the free-free continuum to SFR conversion prescription described in Yun & Carilli (2002). We note that the derived SFR is upper limit for E0 and Regions 1 and 2, because there might be a contribution from the nonthermal synchrotron emission from the putative AGN.
We roughly estimated the possible synchrotron contribution to the 110 GHz flux at the Overlap region using measured 8.44 GHz and 110 GHz fluxes (Saito et al., 2015). Assuming that the spectral index of the synchrotron emission is -0.80 and that the synchrotron dominates 80% of the 8.44 GHz flux (similar to M82; Condon 1992), the synchrotron contribution to the 110 GHz flux is calculated to be 25%. This is not a small value but it does not change any results and discussion in this Paper, because the apertures around the Overlap region also present a similar value of 25%. We need further data points between radio and FIR to precisely evaluate thermal and nonthermal fluxes, which is beyond the scope of this Paper. We further discuss the slope of and flux density relations here. The ratio (i.e., the star formation efficiency of dense gas, SFE = SFR/) is discussed in Section 5.2.
In Figure 13, is plotted against HCN and HCO integrated fluxes. In general, integrated flux densities roughly correlate with in log scale as pointed out in many studies (e.g., Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b; Privon et al., 2015; Usero et al., 2015; Shimajiri et al., 2017). We estimate the slope by fitting all the data points except Region 1, where considerable contamination by the putative AGN might be possible. The derived slope for vs. HCN (1–0), HCN (3–2), HCN (4–3), HCO (1–0), HCO (3–2), and HCO (4–3) fluxes are 2.03 0.18, 0.83 0.07, 0.65 0.04, 1.69 0.67, 1.30 0.16, and 0.84 0.14, respectively. Although both the number of data points and the covered x- and y-ranges are small, the slope vary for different dense gas tracers. To clarify the excitation dependence, we plot the slope as a function of upper- in Figure 14, showing a decreasing trend as upper- increases of both HCN and HCO (from 2 to 0.5). This can be explained by two simple mechanisms, as we discuss next:
At the lower regime ( 20 yr kpc), FUV heating by star-forming activity is inefficient and not enough to thermalize high critical density tracers toward higher-. Consequently, flux densities of = 3–2 and 4–3 lines of HCN and HCO decrease, and thus the index becomes sublinear. Hydrodynamic simulations with non-LTE radiative transfer calculations (Narayanan et al., 2008) reproduced this trend for HCN transitions from = 1–0 to 5–4. An analytic model provided by Krumholz & Thompson (2007) also reproduced this similar trend as a function of critical density.
At the higher regime ( 20 yr kpc), high critical density tracers can be easily excited by intense FUV radiation from massive star-forming regions (i.e., efficient collisional excitation due to high temperature or density). Furthermore, the presence of energetic activities (e.g., shock, AGN) tends to excite molecular gas ISM. Recent multiple CO observations have revealed that higher CO lines are more dominantly heated by such energetic activities (Greve et al., 2014), and brighter galaxies at IR show more excited CO conditions (Kamenetzky et al., 2016). Expanding those evidences to dense gas tracers, excitation of dense gas ISM at higher regime (i.e., higher IR) should be enhanced by energetic activities. Thus, the presence of intense starbursts and energetic activities can boost fluxes of higher HCN and HCO lines, leading to the sublinear slope. This is consistent with the explanation of a decreasing index with increasing of CO due to an increasing contribution of mechanical heating from supernovae (Greve et al., 2014). We will quantitatively discuss the excitation mechanisms of the dense gas tracers in Section 5.5.
Considering the observational fact that AGN contribution to the total IR luminosity increases as the IR luminosity increases (e.g., Ichikawa et al., 2014), the presence of AGN can boost higher HCN and HCO fluxes. However, we exclude the data point which might be dominated by AGN (i.e., Region 1) when deriving the slope, so this is not an applicable explanation for the case of the filament of VV 114.
We note that the – integrated flux plots are equivalent to the FIR luminosity – dense gas luminosity relations in the sense that all data points shown here can be assumed to have a similar distance, aperture size, and filling factor, and thus, the slope will not change.
5.2. Sfe, Sfe, and
Here we discuss the star formation activity which takes place in the filament of VV 114 using , molecular gas mass surface densities (), and dense gas mass surface densities (). In addition, we obtain SFE (= /), SFE (= /), and dense gas fraction, f, (= /). We use as in Saito et al. (2017a), which utilizes the 880 m dust continuum emission and the formulation to obtain molecular gas mass from the 880 m flux density described in Scoville et al. (2016). is calculated by dividing the dense gas mass () by the aperture area. is calculated using the following equation (Gao & Solomon, 2004b),
where is the HCN (1–0) luminosity to dense gas mass conversion factor in (K km s pc) and is the HCN (1–0) luminosity in K km s pc. We adopted 10 (K km s pc) for as in Gao & Solomon (2004b). The derived surface densities are listed in Table 4.
We show surface densities along the filament of VV 114 in Figure 15a. To compare the overall trends between three quantities, we normalized all data points by their peak values. The normalization of , , and is 56.3 kpc yr, 1420 pc, and 268 pc, respectively. All profiles peak close to the eastern nucleus (Region 2 or 3), and show a decreasing trend toward the western side (Region 11). This indicates that Region 2 and 3 are sites of ongoing massive, intense star formation (except for the AGN position, region 1). On the other hand, the Overlap region (Region 5-8) show moderate star formation (1/5 of the nuclear star formation) with relatively large amount of diffuse and dense gas (1/2 of gas mass or surface density around the eastern nucleus). This trend becomes clearer when we use the surface density ratios (i.e., SFE, SFE, and ). These are listed in Table 4, and shown in Figure 15b. Note that both SFEs correspond to the intercept of the log - log relations with a slope of unity. SFEs are high around the eastern nucleus (2-3 times higher than those at the Overlap region). The western side of the filament (Region 11) also shows high SFE, which is comparable to that at Region 2 and 3. Region 11 coincides with strong H (Zaragoza-Cardiel et al., 2016) and Pa (Tateuchi et al., 2015) peaks, so this may be a relatively unobscured (i.e., not dusty) star-forming region associated with the western galaxy (Grimes et al., 2006). In contrast to the SFEs, peaks at Region 8. The Overlap region has 1.5-2 times larger than Region 1-3 and 11. The eastern nucleus is the site of young massive starburst, whereas the Overlap region is dominated by dense gas, and a site of moderate star formation, which has, for instance, = (1.8 0.2) 10 (Region 6) of fuel for future star formation.
5.3. Turbulence-regulated Star Formation
In order to investigate what physical mechanism governs the observable quantities of star formation at the filament of VV 114, we employ a turbulence-regulated star formation model (Krumholz & McKee 2005; see also Usero et al. 2015 for an application to observing data). A simple formulation of this model is useful to parameterize the observed quantities (i.e., SFE and ) with molecular cloud properties. The equations are,
where is the efficiency depending on the virial state of the clouds, is the Mach number, is the free-fall timescale () for a given average volume density (), and is the width of the lognormal probability distribution function (PDF) of gas density within a cloud. This model explains the star formation in a virialized molecular cloud using two parameters, and : (1) When turbulence in a cloud is high (i.e., high ), it inhibits star formation leading to low SFE, although it broadens the density PDF (i.e., increasing the fraction of HCN-emitting dense gas = high ). (2) When the average gas density () increases, it shortens (i.e., SFE increases), and naturally results in higher . Throughout this Paper, we assume = 2.8 10 cm and = 0.28%, which are the same values as those used in Usero et al. (2015).
The observed log SFE against log is plotted in Figure 16. As already seen in Figure 15, data points at the Overlap region shows systematically high and low SFE. We overlaid the turbulence-regulated star formation model (- grid) on this Figure. The grid clearly characterizes the Overlap region as a turbulent lower density ISM ( 5 and 10 cm) relative to the eastern nucleus ( 2 and 10 cm). The absolute values are uncertain because of the assumed conversion factors to derive the surface densities and the assigned SFR tracer. For example, when we use 8.4 GHz continuum emission as the SFR tracer (instead of the 110 GHz continuum), SFE decreases by a factor of 2, hence () tends to increase (decrease). The effect of uncertainties of the conversion factors on SFEs will be discussed later. However, since the general trend does not change regardless of the employed SFR tracer or adopted conversion factor, the relative differences between the eastern nucleus and the Overlap region also do not change.
Large-scale shocks driven by the interaction between the progenitor’s galaxies where proposed by Saito et al. (2017a), which causes an enhancement of methanol abundance at the Overlap region. We now suggest that the starburst is induced by this shock. Molecular clouds at the Overlap region of VV 114 are compressed by violent merger-induced shocks, and then the shock-induced intracloud turbulence have started to dissipate, which in part will form new stars. This view is consistent with the scenario of widespread star formation at the early-to-mid stages of major mergers predicted by numerical simulations (e.g., Saitoh et al., 2009). The eastern nucleus already shows intense star formation activity, which might be due to efficient gas inflow towards the nucleus at the early-stage of a merger (Iono et al., 2004b).
Another model, the so-called density threshold model (e.g., Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b), suggests that the rate at which molecular gas turns into stars depends on the dense gas mass within a molecular cloud (i.e., = ; e.g., Lada et al., 2012), and thus it can simply explain the observed linear correlation between and . It, in turn, predicts a linear correlation between SFE (= /) and . However, as we can see in Figure 16, VV 114 data do not show such a positive linear correlation (the correlation coefficient is -0.55), showing that the density threshold model is not appropriate for the VV 114 data. The density threshold model also predicts constant SFE from Galactic star-forming region to extragalactic star-forming region (i.e., ), although the filament of VV 114 shows a decreasing trend towards the west (Figure 15).
We note that this result does not change by adopting different conversion factors to derive and . Considering that scales similarly as , and is a few times lower at the nuclear regions than in other quiescent regions of galaxies (Sandstrom et al., 2013), should not be larger at the eastern nucleus of VV 114 than at the Overlap region. In order to get a constant SFE along the filament of VV 114, we could need more (less) at the eastern nucleus (Overlap region), resulting in 2-3 times larger at the eastern nucleus, which is not an applicable value.
Similar to SFE, the difference of SFE between the nucleus and the Overlap region tends to increase when adopting plausible conversion factors. We used the formulation described in Scoville et al. (2016) to derive from 880 m continuum flux (see Saito et al., 2017a), assuming a constant of 25 K. However, the intense nuclear starburst at the eastern nucleus may result in warmer gas temperature than that for the Overlap region (see Section 5.5). Since the derived decreases with increasing , SFE tends to increase (decrease) at the eastern nucleus (Overlap region), which enlarges the observed SFE gradient along the filament. In summary, the systematic uncertainties of the conversion factors do not change the trend seen in Figure 16.
5.4. Line Ratios vs.
Here we examine the dependence of dense gas excitation ratios on using the measured data along the filament of VV 114 (see Table 2), as previously done for CO excitation (Tsai et al., 2012; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Kamenetzky et al., 2016). As shown in Figure 17, all excitation ratios measured in VV 114 correlate well with , although Region 1 (i.e., AGN position) clearly deviates from the correlation. The correlation coefficients are 0.66, 0.70, 0.67, and 0.70, for HCN (3–2)/HCN (1–0) (Figure 17a), HCN (4–3)/HCN (1–0) (Figure 17b), HCO (3–2)/HCO (1–0) (Figure 17c), and HCO (4–3)/HCO (1–0) (Figure 17d), respectively, although the coefficients become 0.97, 0.99, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively when excluding Region 1. This indicates that the excitation condition at Region 1 is clearly different from that at other regions in the filament, and star formation activity may govern dense gas excitation except for Region 1. A conceivable explanation of the unusual excitation found in Region 1 is the influence of an AGN. Region 1 shows the highest excitation ratios in VV 114 but modest . The at Region 1, derived by using 110 GHz continuum emission, may be an upper limit because of the non-thermal contribution from the putative AGN (see Saito et al., 2017a), so Region 1 deviates more and more when excluding the possible AGN contribution. This is consistent with the results from high-resolution observations of multiple molecular lines toward the nearest type 2 AGN host LIRG NGC 1068 (García-Burillo et al., 2014; Viti et al., 2014). The circumnuclear disk of NGC 1068, whose ISM is thought to be dominantly affected by the central AGN, has at least a few times higher excitation ratios of CO, HCN, and HCO than in the starburst ring with hundred pc scale.
The HCN/HCO line ratios show a similar trend against . The correlation coefficients are 0.46, 0.57, and 0.62, for HCN (1–0)/HCO (1–0) (Figure 18a), HCN (3–2)/HCO (3–2) (Figure 18b), and HCN (4–3)/HCO (4–3) (Figure 18c), respectively, although the coefficients become 0.85, 0.87, and 0.93, respectively when excluding Region 1. Since, for a given , HCN has a few times higher critical density than HCO (Shirley, 2015), the strong correlation between HCN/HCO ratios and is naturally explained by FUV heating from star-forming regions as with the correlation between excitation ratios and . On the other hand, Region 1 clearly deviates from trends found in all line ratio plots against , suggesting the presence of another mechanisms to boost the observed line ratios (i.e., AGN).
5.5. Radiative Transfer Modeling under LTE
Here we derive excitation temperature () and column density () at each aperture position in VV 114 using a single component rotation diagram method, assuming optically-thin gas and LTE conditions. Recent multiple CO transitions have revealed that nearby IR-bright galaxies (e.g., Downes & Solomon, 1998; Zhu et al., 2003; Iono et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007; Sliwa et al., 2012; Saito et al., 2015, 2017b) show CO (1–0) emission with moderate optical depth (1). Considering 1-2 orders of magnitude weaker HCN (1–0) and HCO (1–0) emission relative to CO (1–0) in such IR-bright galaxies (Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b; Privon et al., 2015), it is reasonable to assume optically-thin HCN (1–0) and HCO (1–0) lines in VV 114. In Section 5.5.2, we examine the appropriateness of the optically-thin and the single component assumptions.
5.5.1 Rotation Diagram Analysis
where is the integrated intensity in units of K km s (proportional to the upper state column density, ), is the line strength, is the dipole moment, is the frequency of the transition, is the rotational partition function, is the Boltzmann constant, is the Planck constant, is the cosmic microwave background temperature (= 2.73 K), and is the upper state energy. The molecular line database Splatalogue444http://www.splatalogue.net/ and the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy (CDMS555http://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/cdms/catalog#partition; Müller et al., 2001, 2005) were used to get the transition parameters necessary for the calculation. For regions without multiple detections, we used an averaged between Region 3 and 9, where are not contaminated by the putative AGN.
Figure 19a shows the fitting result for Region 1 as an example. The data appear to be well fitted by a single component, although all regions show that = 3–2 ( = 1–0 and 4–3) flux is overestimated (underestimated). Some possibilities to explain this trend will be discussed in Section 5.5.2. The derived and for HCN ( and ) and HCO ( and ) are listed in Table 5 and shown in Figures 19b and 19c. Both and peak at Region 1 (10.2 2.5 K and 12.3 2.8 K, respectively) and decrease towards the western side of the filament. The derived temperature of 5-8 K at the Overlap region is consistent with the derived from rotational transitions of methanol ( = 6-9 K; Saito et al., 2017a). We compare the derived and with in Figure 20. This figure is more straightforward to interpret than the excitation ratio plots (Figure 17) to understand the energetics of dense gas, because some effects controlling the observed line ratios (e.g., optical depth, column density, and fractional abundance) are decomposed. Both and correlate with , except for Region 1. The correlation coefficients are 0.71 and 0.63 for and , respectively, whereas, without Region 1 data, those are 0.96 and 0.94, respectively. Those correlations clearly show that HCN and HCO molecules are excited by star-forming activities in the filament of VV 114, and Region 1 needs additional efficient heating mechanisms. This explanation is consistent with CO excitation in (U)LIRGs (Greve et al., 2014; Kamenetzky et al., 2016), indicating that, in general, both diffuse and dense molecular ISM have a similar excitation condition (but see, e.g., Sakamoto et al., 2013; Aalto et al., 2015b; Imanishi et al., 2016b, which show the importance of radiative (IR) pumping for higher- HCN and HNC).
The derived dense gas column densities (Figure 19c) peak at Region 3 and slightly decrease towards the west, that is, the eastern nucleus contains warmer and more massive dense gas than the Overlap region. However, when we see the fractional abundances relative to H (e.g., = /), the trend changes. shows a remarkably flat distribution along the filament, whereas shows a slightly increasing trend towards the west. These are the first measurements of spatially-resolved and for a LIRG. The average and are (3.5 0.7) 10 and (8.9 1.4) 10, respectively. Those fractional abundances are similar to other measurements for Galactic star-forming regions and nearby bright galaxies (e.g., Blake et al., 1987; Krips et al., 2008). Next, we divide by to see the spatial distribution of the HCN/HCO abundance ratio, /, as shown in Figure 21. Although the errors are large, the abundance ratio tends to peak at Region 1. Also, the HCN (1–0)/HCO (1–0) flux ratio shows a similar trend (Figure 12) from 1 (Region 1) to 0.2 (Region 10), indicating that the optically-thin approximation for HCN (1–0) and HCO (1–0) lines is reasonable assumption in this case.
The same analysis for the AGN peak position (E0) shows that = 9.8 1.6 K, = (8.0 3.8) 10 cm, = 10.9 2.4 K, = (5.4 3.3) 10 cm, and / = 1.5 1.2 (Table 5). The putative AGN position of VV 114 shows a relatively high /, resulting in observed high HCN (1–0)/HCO (1–0) flux ratio. Higher HCN/HCO ratios in higher- seen at the AGN position is due to the combination effect of the high / and comparably high rotation temperatures between both molecules ( ). Similar rotation temperatures keep the ratio between the upper state column densities of HCN and HCO for a given , so the observed HCN/HCO ratio SLED seems to be flat close to the AGN position (Figure 12). Other regions along the filament show relatively low / ( 0.7) and low rotation temperatures ( 10 K). Lower HCN temperatures ( ) result in the steeper shape of the HCN/HCO ratio SLED.
5.5.2 Two-component ISM?
Here, we discuss the effect of optical depth on the rotation diagram analysis. According to the LTE radiative transfer calculation described by Goldsmith & Langer (1999), the transition of maximum opacity for a given linear molecule can be written as,
where is the cloud temperature in Kelvin and is the rotation constant in GHz. For HCN molecule ( = 44.31597 GHz) with = 10-20 K, = 2-3. For the sake of simplicity, we ignore the background radiation term. In the limit 1 (i.e., 0.048 ), the ratio of the optical depth of the most optically thick transition () to that of the = 1–0 transition () can be expressed as,
This indicates that, for HCN molecule with = 10-20 K, optical depth at 3 is 1.7-3.5 times larger than that at = 1.
On the rotation diagram (for example, Figure 19a), data points should be aligned with a single straight line when the observed transitions are optically-thin under LTE. The expected deviation of the apparent upper state column density at from the optically-thin straight line can be estimated using the equation below.
where is the apparent upper state column density attenuated by line opacity () and is the opacity-corrected upper state column density. When 0 (i.e., optically-thin limit), becomes . The apparent deviation at = 3–2 from the straight line through = 1–0 and 4–3 is 10/10 1.78 (Figure 19a), which corresponds to 1.3. This is a lower limit because here we assumed optically-thin = 1–0 and 4–3 emissions to derive = 10 cm. Using = 1.7-3.5, is 0.4-0.8. Although this is a rough estimate, it is consistent with = 0.3-1.4 derived by the non-LTE modeling for HCN and HCO transitions (Krips et al., 2008), indicating that the moderate optical depth at = 3–2 ( 1.3) may drive the apparent two-component excitation seen in the rotation diagram. This discussion can also be applied to HCO, which has similar excitation parameters to HCN. We conclude that the apparent two-component excitation condition seen in the rotation diagrams of HCN and HCO can be explained by finite optical depths, which peak at 3. For much higher- HCN ( 15), radiative pumping rather than collision becomes more important to explain the level population, resulting in a true two-component ISM (e.g., Rangwala et al., 2011). Observations of other rotational transitions are essential to investigate the appropriateness for other assumptions (e.g., non-LTE excitation).
We present new high-resolution (02–15) images of multiple HCN and HCO transitions ( = 1–0, 3–2, and 4–3), HNC = 1–0, CS = 7–6, and continuum emissions toward the nearby luminous infrared galaxy VV 114 with ALMA bands 3, 6, and 7. We map the spatial distribution of the three HCN and HCO transitions for a LIRG for the first time. We summarize the main results of this Paper as follows:
All line and continuum images, except for HCN (4–3) and CS (7–6) lines (probably because of their high critical densities and low flux densities), show an extended clumpy filament (6 kpc length) across the progenitor’s galaxy nuclei of VV 114, which has been previously mapped through many molecular and ionized gas tracers. With our high-resolution Band 7 continuum images (80 pc resolution), we found that the filament has a narrow width ( 200 pc). Such filamentary structure is predicted by numerical simulations of major mergers.
Both excitation ratios (i.e., HCN (–)/HCN (1–0)) and HCN/HCO ratios (e.g., HCN (–)/HCO (–)) show higher values at the eastern nucleus, relative to the Overlap region between the nuclei of the two galaxies. We plot spatially-resolved HCN and HCO SLEDs for the first time, which clearly shows that the peaks are located at 3 for the Overlap region whereas 3 for the eastern nucleus. The values in the HCO SLED are generally larger than those in the HCN SLED. The HCN/HCO ratio SLED shows a remarkably high, flat shape at the AGN position, while a decreasing trend with increasing is seen in other regions.
Integrated fluxes - and flux ratios - plots of different 3 apertures along the filament show positive trends when excluding the putative AGN, indicating that star formation activity is closely related to surface density and excitation of dense gas. For both HCN and HCO, we found that the slope of the log – log plots decreases as increases. This can be explained by subthermalized gas excitation at the lower () regime and/or the presence of powerful heating source(s) at the higher regime.
Furthermore, we estimate the surface densities of total H mass and dense gas mass, and then SFE (= /), SFE (= /), and (= /), assuming constant conversion factors. Although both SFEs peak at the eastern nucleus and are lower at the Overlap region, shows a different trend and peaks at the Overlap region. This trend becomes clearer when we adopt appropriate conversion factors. A simple so-called density threshold star formation model cannot reproduce these trends.
We examine a turbulence-regulated star formation model, and find that the Overlap region has more diffuse and turbulent dense gas properties relative to that of the eastern nucleus. Combined with the fact that methanol abundance in gas-phase at the Overlap region is elevated due to large-scale shocks, we suggest that collision between the progenitors of VV 114 has produced the filamentary structure and violent gas inflow toward the eastern nucleus is triggering both starburst and AGN activities. Merger-induced shocks, which can enhance the intracloud turbulence, dominates at the Overlap region, but dissipates to form new massive star-forming regions.
Radiative transfer analysis under LTE and optically-thin assumptions revealed that the rotation temperatures and column densities are higher at the eastern nucleus. Except for the AGN position, the rotation temperatures are clearly correlated to , indicating that dense gas excitation in the filament is dominantly governed by star formation activity. The fractional abundance of HCN relative to H is remarkably flat along the filament, showing that the HCN abundance might be insensitive to environmental effects in VV 114 (i.e., AGN, starbursts, and shocked Overlap region). The average fractional abundances of HCN and HCO are (3.5 0.7) 10 and (8.9 1.4) 10, respectively.
The observed high HCN/HCO flux ratio at the eastern nucleus is likely due to a high HCN/HCO abundance ratio, and the high excitation ratio there is potentially due to efficient heating by AGN activity.
- Aalto et al. (1991) Aalto, S., Johansson, L. E. B., Booth, R. S., & Black, J. H. 1991, A&A, 249, 323
- Aalto et al. (2002) Aalto, S., Polatidis, A. G., Hüttemeister, S., & Curran, S. J. 2002, A&A, 381, 783
- Aalto et al. (2007) Aalto, S., Spaans, M., Wiedner, M. C., & Hüttemeister, S. 2007, A&A, 464, 193
- Aalto (2013) Aalto, S. 2013, Molecular Gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies, 292, 199
- Aalto et al. (2015a) Aalto, S., Garcia-Burillo, S., Muller, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A85
- Aalto et al. (2015b) Aalto, S., Martín, S., Costagliola, F., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A42
- Aladro et al. (2015) Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101
- Armus et al. (2009) Armus, L., Mazzarella, J. M., Evans, A. S., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 559
- Blake et al. (1987) Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, ApJ, 315, 621
- Condon (1992) Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575
- Costagliola et al. (2011) Costagliola, F., Aalto, S., Rodriguez, M. I., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A30
- Costagliola et al. (2013) Costagliola, F., Aalto, S., Sakamoto, K., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A66
- Downes & Solomon (1998) Downes, D., & Solomon, P. M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615
- Espada et al. (2017) Espada, D., Matsushita, S., Miura, R. E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 136
- Gao & Solomon (2004a) Gao, Y., & Solomon, P. M. 2004a, ApJ, 606, 271
- Gao & Solomon (2004b) Gao, Y., & Solomon, P. M. 2004b, ApJS, 152, 63
- García-Burillo et al. (2012) García-Burillo, S., Usero, A., Alonso-Herrero, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A8
- García-Burillo et al. (2014) García-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Usero, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A125
- Goldsmith & Langer (1999) Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209
- Graciá-Carpio et al. (2006) Graciá-Carpio, J., García-Burillo, S., Planesas, P., & Colina, L. 2006, ApJ, 640, L135
- Graciá-Carpio et al. (2008) Graciá-Carpio, J., García-Burillo, S., Planesas, P., Fuente, A., & Usero, A. 2008, A&A, 479, 703
- Greve et al. (2014) Greve, T. R., Leonidaki, I., Xilouris, E. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 142
- Grimes et al. (2006) Grimes, J. P., Heckman, T., Hoopes, C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 310
- Hsieh et al. (2012) Hsieh, P.-Y., Ho, P. T. P., Kohno, K., Hwang, C.-Y., & Matsushita, S. 2012, ApJ, 747, 90
- Huettemeister et al. (1995) Huettemeister, S., Henkel, C., Mauersberger, R., et al. 1995, A&A, 295, 571
- Ichikawa et al. (2014) Ichikawa, K., Imanishi, M., Ueda, Y., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 139
- Imanishi et al. (2007) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., Tamura, Y., Oi, N., & Kohno, K. 2007, AJ, 134, 2366
- Imanishi & Nakanishi (2013a) Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2013a, AJ, 146, 47
- Imanishi & Nakanishi (2013b) Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2013b, AJ, 146, 91
- Imanishi & Nakanishi (2014) Imanishi, M., & Nakanishi, K. 2014, AJ, 148, 9
- Imanishi et al. (2016a) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016a, ApJ, 822, L10
- Imanishi et al. (2016b) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016b, ApJ, 825, 44
- Imanishi et al. (2016c) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2016c, AJ, 152, 218
- Imanishi et al. (2017) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2017, ApJ, 849, 29
- Imanishi et al. (2018) Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2018, ApJ, 856, 143
- Iono et al. (2004a) Iono, D., Ho, P. T. P., Yun, M. S., et al. 2004a, ApJ, 616, L63
- Iono et al. (2004b) Iono, D., Yun, M. S., & Mihos, J. C. 2004b, ApJ, 616, 199
- Iono et al. (2007) Iono, D., Wilson, C. D., Takakuwa, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 283
- Iono et al. (2013) Iono, D., Saito, T., Yun, M. S., et al. 2013, PASJ, 65, L7
- Izumi et al. (2013) Izumi, T., Kohno, K., Martín, S., et al. 2013, PASJ, 65, 100
- Izumi et al. (2015) Izumi, T., Kohno, K., Aalto, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 811, 39
- Izumi et al. (2016) Izumi, T., Kohno, K., Aalto, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 42
- Kamenetzky et al. (2016) Kamenetzky, J., Rangwala, N., Glenn, J., Maloney, P. R., & Conley, A. 2016, ApJ, 829, 93
- Kazandjian et al. (2015) Kazandjian, M. V., Meijerink, R., Pelupessy, I., Israel, F. P., & Spaans, M. 2015, A&A, 574, A127
- Knudsen et al. (2007) Knudsen, K. K., Walter, F., Weiss, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 156
- Kohno et al. (2001) Kohno, K., Matsushita, S., Vila-Vilaró, B., et al. 2001, The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts and AGN: The La Palma Connection, 249, 672
- Kohno (2005) Kohno, K. 2005, The Evolution of Starbursts, 783, 203
- Krips et al. (2008) Krips, M., Neri, R., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 262-275
- Krumholz & McKee (2005) Krumholz, M. R., & McKee, C. F. 2005, ApJ, 630, 250
- Krumholz & Thompson (2007) Krumholz, M. R., & Thompson, T. A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 289
- Lada et al. (2012) Lada, C. J., Forbrich, J., Lombardi, M., & Alves, J. F. 2012, ApJ, 745, 190
- Lundgren et al. (2013) Lundgren, A., 2013, ALMA Cycle 2 Technical Handbook Version 1.1, ALMA
- Martín et al. (2015) Martín, S., Kohno, K., Izumi, T., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A116
- Mangum & Shirley (2015) Mangum, J. G., & Shirley, Y. L. 2015, PASP, 127, 266
- McMullin et al. (2007) McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, 376, 127
- Meier & Turner (2005) Meier, D. S., & Turner, J. L. 2005, ApJ, 618, 259
- Meijerink et al. (2011) Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., Loenen, A. F., & van der Werf, P. P. 2011, A&A, 525, A119
- Michiyama et al. (2016) Michiyama, T., Iono, D., Nakanishi, K., et al. 2016, PASJ,
- Müller et al. (2001) Müller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., & Winnewisser, G. 2001, A&A, 370, L49
- Müller et al. (2005) Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215
- Narayanan et al. (2008) Narayanan, D., Cox, T. J., Shirley, Y., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 996-1008
- Papadopoulos (2007) Papadopoulos, P. P. 2007, ApJ, 656, 792
- Papadopoulos et al. (2014) Papadopoulos, P. P., Zhang, Z.-Y., Xilouris, E. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 153
- Peacock et al. (2000) Peacock, J. A., Rowan-Robinson, M., Blain, A. W., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 535
- Pérez-Beaupuits et al. (2007) Pérez-Beaupuits, J. P., Aalto, S., & Gerebro, H. 2007, A&A, 476, 177
- Privon et al. (2015) Privon, G. C., Herrero-Illana, R., Evans, A. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 39
- Rangwala et al. (2011) Rangwala, N., Maloney, P. R., Glenn, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 94
- Rosenberg et al. (2015) Rosenberg, M. J. F., van der Werf, P. P., Aalto, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 72
- Saito et al. (2015) Saito, T., Iono, D., Yun, M. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 60
- Saito et al. (2017a) Saito, T., Iono, D., Espada, D., et al. 2017a, ApJ, 834, 6
- Saito et al. (2017b) Saito, T., Iono, D., Xu, C. K., et al. 2017b, ApJ, 835, 174
- Saitoh et al. (2009) Saitoh, T. R., Daisaka, H., Kokubo, E., et al. 2009, PASJ, 61, 481
- Sakamoto et al. (2010) Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Evans, A. S., Wiedner, M. C., & Wilner, D. J. 2010, ApJ, 725, L228
- Sakamoto et al. (2013) Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Costagliola, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 42
- Salak et al. (2018) Salak, D., Tomiyasu, Y., Nakai, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 97
- Sandstrom et al. (2013) Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 5
- Schirm et al. (2016) Schirm, M. R. P., Wilson, C. D., Madden, S. C., & Clements, D. L. 2016, ApJ, 823, 87
- Shirley (2015) Shirley, Y. L. 2015, PASP, 127, 299
- Scoville et al. (2000) Scoville, N. Z., Evans, A. S., Thompson, R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 991
- Scoville et al. (2016) Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Aussel, H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 83
- Shimajiri et al. (2017) Shimajiri, Y., André, P., Braine, J., et al. 2017, arXiv:1705.00213
- Sliwa et al. (2012) Sliwa, K., Wilson, C. D., Petitpas, G. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 46
- Sliwa et al. (2013) Sliwa, K., Wilson, C. D., Krips, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 126
- Spilker et al. (2014) Spilker, J. S., Marrone, D. P., Aguirre, J. E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 149
- Stephens et al. (2016) Stephens, I. W., Jackson, J. M., Whitaker, J. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 29
- Tateuchi et al. (2015) Tateuchi, K., Konishi, M., Motohara, K., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 1
- Teyssier et al. (2010) Teyssier, R., Chapon, D., & Bournaud, F. 2010, ApJ, 720, L149
- Tsai et al. (2012) Tsai, M., Hwang, C.-Y., Matsushita, S., Baker, A. J., & Espada, D. 2012, ApJ, 746, 129
- Tunnard et al. (2015) Tunnard, R., Greve, T. R., Garcia-Burillo, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 114
- Ueda et al. (2016) Ueda, J., Watanabe, Y., Iono, D., et al. 2016, arXiv:1611.00002
- Usero et al. (2015) Usero, A., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 115
- Viti et al. (2014) Viti, S., García-Burillo, S., Fuente, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A28
- Watanabe et al. (2014) Watanabe, Y., Sakai, N., Sorai, K., & Yamamoto, S. 2014, ApJ, 788, 4
- Wilson et al. (2008) Wilson, C. D., Petitpas, G. R., Iono, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 189-224
- Yun et al. (1994) Yun, M. S., Scoville, N. Z., & Knop, R. A. 1994, ApJ, 430, L109
- Yun & Carilli (2002) Yun, M. S., & Carilli, C. L. 2002, ApJ, 568, 88
- Zaragoza-Cardiel et al. (2016) Zaragoza-Cardiel, J., Beckman, J., Font, J., et al. 2016, arXiv:1611.03863
- Zhang et al. (2014) Zhang, Z.-Y., Gao, Y., Henkel, C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, L31
- Zhu et al. (2003) Zhu, M., Seaquist, E. R., & Kuno, N. 2003, ApJ, 588, 243
- Zhu et al. (2007) Zhu, M., Gao, Y., Seaquist, E. R., & Dunne, L. 2007, AJ, 134, 118
|Line||MRS||-weight||Beam size||rms||Recovered flux||Ref.|
|(GHz)||(K)||(″)||(″)||(km s)||(mJy b)||(Jy km s)||(%)|
|HCN||1–0||88.63160||4.25||22||briggs||1.45 1.06||20||0.4||3.53 0.24||40 5||1|
|3–2||265.88643||25.52||9||natural||0.60 0.47||30||0.4||8.36 0.73|
|4–3||354.50548||42.53||7||natural||0.19 0.15||30||0.3||5.99 0.93||18||2|
|HCO||1–0||89.18852||4.28||22||briggs||1.45 1.04||20||0.5||12.18 0.69||52 4||1|
|3–2||267.55763||25.68||9||natural||0.60 0.47||30||0.4||29.83 2.44|
|4–3||356.73422||42.80||7||natural||0.19 0.15||30||0.4||18.52 2.85||46 14||2|
|HNC||1–0||90.66357||4.35||22||natural||1.43 1.29||50||0.6||1.03 0.20||27 7||1|
|CS||7–6||342.88285||65.83||7||natural||0.18 0.15||50||0.3||0.41 0.10||1||2|
Note. – Column 1: Observed molecule. Column 2: Observed rotational transition. Column 3: Rest frequency. Column 4: Upper state energy. Column 5: Maximum recoverable scale of the image cube. Column 6: Visibility (-plane) weighting for imaging. “briggs” means Briggs weighting with robust = 0.5. Column 7: Beam size of the image cube. Column 8: Velocity resolution of the image cube. Column 9: Noise rms in the data which have velocity resolution of . Column 10: Total integrated intensity. We consider the statistical error and the systematic error of the flux calibration in this column. Column 11: The ALMA interferometric flux divided by the single-dish flux. Column 12: Reference of the single-dish flux. (1) Privon et al. (2015); (2) Zhang et al. (2014)
|IDaaNomenclature as in Saito et al. (2017a).|
|(Jy km s)||(Jy km s)||(Jy km s)||(Jy km s)||(Jy km s)||(Jy km s)|
|1||0.38 0.06||2.28 0.19||2.56 0.41||0.36 0.06||3.33 0.27||5.26 0.80|
|2||1.08 0.08||4.53 0.37||5.62 0.85||1.46 0.10||10.12 0.81||16.08 2.42|
|3||1.11 0.08||3.87 0.31||4.57 0.70||1.99 0.12||10.85 0.87||16.22 2.44|
|4||0.80 0.07||1.88 0.16||1.78 0.28||1.85 0.12||6.23 0.50||7.62 1.15|
|5||0.58 0.07||0.83 0.09||0.28||1.68 0.12||4.25 0.35||1.96 0.32|
|6||0.58 0.07||0.79 0.08||0.31 0.08||1.52 0.11||4.32 0.35||3.24 0.50|
|7||0.55 0.06||0.72 0.07||0.49 0.10||1.19 0.09||3.79 0.31||4.31 0.66|
|8||0.43 0.05||0.54 0.07||0.27 0.08||1.07 0.08||2.80 0.23||3.01 0.47|
|9||0.24 0.04||0.34 0.05||0.27||0.93 0.08||2.14 0.18||2.00 0.32|
|10||0.17||0.32 0.05||0.28||0.71 0.07||2.09 0.18||1.53 0.26|
|Unit||AGN (E0)||starburst (E1)|
|mJy||1.98 0.30||1.49 0.23|
|Jy km s||0.34 0.04|
|Jy km s||1.79 0.15|
|Jy km s||1.60 0.24||0.62 0.10|
|Jy km s||0.31 0.04|
|Jy km s||1.53 0.13|
|Jy km s||1.54 0.24||1.20 0.18|
|Jy km s||0.29 0.07|
|Jy km s||0.33 0.07||0.12|
|Jy km s||0.26|
|Jy km s||0.26||0.12|
|1||90 13||0.13 0.02||0.038 0.004||0.28 0.05|
|2||260 20||0.18 0.02||0.040 0.004||0.22 0.02|
|3||268 18||0.19 0.02||0.037 0.004||0.19 0.02|
|4||192 17||0.18 0.02||0.023 0.003||0.13 0.01|
|5||139 17||0.17 0.03||0.017 0.002||0.10 0.02|
|6||140 18||0.22 0.04||0.017 0.003||0.08 0.01|
|7||132 14||0.19 0.03||0.016 0.003||0.08 0.01|
|8||104 13||0.26 0.04||0.017 0.004||0.06 0.01|
|9||59 11||0.26 0.06||0.020 0.006||0.08 0.03|