Self-fields in thin superconducting tapes: implications to the thickness effect in coated conductors

Self-fields in thin superconducting tapes: implications to the thickness effect in coated conductors

Alvaro Sanchez, Carles Navau, Nuria Del-Valle, and Du-Xing Chen Grup d’Electromagnetisme, Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Most applications of superconductors, such as power transmission lines, motors, generators, and transformers, require long cables through which large currents circulate. Impressive progress has recently been achieved in the current-carrying capability in conductors based on high-temperature superconductors. Coated conductors are likely the best examples, consisting of very good quality thin layers of YBaCu0 (YBCO) superconductor grown on top of a metallic tape with some intermediate layers. However, there is an important problem for achieving large currents: a large decrease in transport critical-current density when increasing film thickness has been observed in coated conductors made by all available techniques foltynnature (); larbalestiernature (); luborsky (); foltynAPL93 (); foltynAPL99 (); kang (); emergo (); civale (); foltynAPL05 (); kim (); takahashi (); foltynsust2009 (). Here, we theoretically explain the nature and the ubiquitous presence of this so-called thickness effect by analyzing the self-field created by the transport currents in the superconductor, assuming a realistic field-dependent . This knowledge can help finding new ways to improve transport current in thick superconducting films.

The most typical manifestation of the thickness effect occurs when measuring the transport of superconducting tapes at self-field (no externally applied magnetic field) as function of the tape thickness. Several explanations have been proposed to partially account for some of the effects, such as enhancement of flux pinning near the heteroepitaxial interface between YBCO and the substrate or interlayer foltynsust2009 (), difference in intergrain coupling for films with different thicknesses solovyov (); feldmann (), or non-uniform distribution of pinning sites across the thickness feldmannapl () . However, the fact that this effect is common for all combination of substrates, preparation technologies, and HTS deposition techniques vmpan (); peer () suggests that there is an underlaying phenomenon that is present in all the studied cases. In this work, we argue that the effect of the self-field of transport currents in thin films is an underlying basis for all the thickness dependence experiments in coated conductors. The existence of this ’universal’ geometry-related thickness effect does not mean that the other mentioned effects (inhomogeneities, interface effects, etc) do not play an important role in particular cases. However, only after understanding the geometrical effects can the rest of phenomena be properly studied.

We consider an infinitely long type-II superconducting strip of rectangular cross-section located at and , which obeys the critical-state model, with a field-dependent critical-current density , where is the modulus of the total magnetic field. We calculate the self-field and the local current density at every point of the superconductor cross-section by an iterative process described in the Methods section (similar procedures were used in bbclem (); rostila ()).

What can the model explain about the thickness effect? To answer this question we plot in Fig. 1 as dots the experimental points corresponding to collected data for different YBCO coated conductors, obtained from the review paper Ref. foltynnature (). These data can be considered a typical systematic study of thickness dependence in state-of-the-art YBCO conductors. The line in Fig. 1 corresponds to the calculated by our model, assuming an intrinsic Kim-type dependence


with values MA/cm and T, and using the actual film dimensions of the experiments (Kim model is chosen becauese it has been shown to fit well the measured in thin YBCO films suenaga ()). The calculated critical-current density follows well the drop observed in the thickness-dependence experiments. The standard thickness dependence is therefore very well reproduced just by assuming a (realistic, see below) function and calculating the transport current at self-field for the exact dimensions used in the experiments, without any extra parameter. The explanation has no need resorting to a spatially dependent function including an extra distance parameter, as in some previous models foltynAPL05 (); foltynsust2009 (); although this spatial dependence may indeed by present in some cases, it is not logical that it appears for so many sample preparation conditions in which the effect has been observed peer ().

The next question to answer is how the Kim-model function we have used represents the actual field dependence in the real samples. In Fig. 2 we plot as dashed line the dependence used in Fig. 1 [Eq. (1)] and as solid line the expected measured as a function of applied field calculated by our model taking into account the self-field, for the case of thickness m. When comparing the calculated with a typical experimental dependence (as in Fig. 8 of the same review paper foltynnature ()), one can see that the theoretical curve has the same behavior as the experimental one, showing a plateau region up to an applied field T and then decreasing with applied field foltynnature (). In contrast, the intrinsic dependence is larger at low fields than the plateau value and merges with the calculated for fields larger than around 0.03 T, because in this region the self-field created by currents is much less than the applied field value, so the internal field is basically chengoldfarb (); peak (); bbclem (); rostila ().

Another conclusion can be obtained from the results in Fig. 2: although the measured value of at applied field =0 is the plateau value 3.3 MA/cm for a thickness m, our model shows that intrinsic can have larger values (a maximum of 12 MA/cm in this case). This means that, following our model, when measuring transport current at self-field in the coated conductor, there are regions that actually have a current density larger than the value of the plateau. This is shown in Fig. 3 where we plot the local values of (Fig. 3a) and (Fig. 3b) for the conductor with m in the conductor midplane, corresponding to Fig. 2, for different values. One can see that in the central region of the sample the local exceeds the plateau value 3.3 MA/cm (dotted line); actually, exactly at the conductor center, the magnetic field is zero (according to Ampere’s law) and therefore current density has there the maximum value of the intrinsic , 12 MA/cm. The fact that there are regions in the sample with local larger than the plateau value opens a path for improving transport in these conductors. It is also interesting to note that the maximum magnetic field in the sample for =0, which occurs at film edges, corresponds rather well to the product bbclem (), and not to (in the studied case MA/cm, around four times larger than 3.3MA/cm) . When the applied field is increased, the maximum in local first moves to one side and then eventually smears out and local and field become both basically constant.

The model for the thickness effect presented in this work also explains the results deduced from the incremental model presented in foltynAPL05 (); foltynsust2009 (). This model artificially assumed a spatially dependent function, which decreases linearly with the vertical distance to the substrate up to a given distance, and then it is constant. From our results, the drop of incremental naturally arises from the field dependence of , with the property that would not decrease in general with the distance from the substrate but with the distance from the center of the sample.

Because the described effects are geometrical and then always present in films, is it therefore impossible to have a thickness-independent ? The answer is not; a possible solution is to try to achieve superconductors such that its intrinsic is roughly constant from 0 to at least the self-field, of the order . Probably this is the situation in some measurements of films that show almost no thickness dependence of foltynsust2009 ().

In view of the above results, we can conclude that an explanation for the ubiquitous thickness effect has been given. It is because of its geometrical nature that it is present in striking similar form for a variety of deposition techniques (PLD, MOCVD, ex situ MOD films, etc. peer ()). However, we would like to remark that our model, although it describes the typical thickness dependence experiments, does not explain some particular experimental data. These cases may thus become the key for finding new strategies of optimizing current capabilities of thick tapes. In one of such cases foltynAPL05 (), Foltyn et al present large values of for multilayers composed of alternating YBCO and CeO layers. The values of for a (thick) multilayer composed of six 0.55m-thick layers of YBCO, with a layer separation of only around 40nm, were very close to the values of a single (thin) YBCO layer. This cannot be explained by our model, since the six YBCO layers separated such short distances should have a similar to that of the whole block, and smaller than that of a single layer. Another example of results which our model cannot explain is the observation of thickness dependent at fields of the order of 1T or more, far above the self-field of currents kim (). Since our model for homogeneous samples fail there, this probably indicates that in these cases spatial inhomogeneities are indeed present, such as enhancement of at the interface foltynAPL05 (). Also, the presence of other effects such as anisotropy or surface barriers may yield results departing for our model predictions, therefore signaling the presence of these phenomena. The described examples show that there are very promising routes to increase in thick YBCO samples. However, these strategies can only succeed if the geometrical effects, for which we have provided analyzing tools in this work, are properly taken into account.

In conclusion, we have explained the existence of a thickness effect in many measurements in superconducting tapes and why this effect appears in samples prepared and measured under many different conditions. Only after this geometrical effect is correctly analyzed in a given experiment, the intrinsic properties of the studied superconductor can be extracted, and in general paths towards large values of transport current in thick superconductors can be properly explored.

We thank Anna Palau, Carlos Monton, Teresa Puig, Xavier Obradors, Alejandro Silhanek, Joffre Gutierrez, and Boris Maiorov for conversations. We thank Consolider Project NANOSELECT (CSD2007-00041) for financial support.


  • (1) Foltyn S. R. et al. Materials science challenges for high-temperature superconducting wire. Nature Mat. 6, 631-642 (2007).
  • (2) Larbalestier, D., Gurevich, A., Feldmann, D. M. and Polyanskii, A. High-Tc superconducting materials for electric power applications. Nature 414, 368-377 (2001).
  • (3) Luborsky, F. E. et al. Reproducible sputtering and properties of Y-Ba-Cu-O films of various thicknesses. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 6388-6391 (1988).
  • (4) Foltyn, S. R., Tiwari, P., Dye, R. C., Le, M. Q., and Wu, X. D. Pulsed-laser deposition of thick YBA2CU3O7-DELTA films with Jc greater than 1 MA/CM2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 1848-1850 (1993).
  • (5) Foltyn, S. R. et al. Relationship between film thickness and the critical current of YBa2Cu3O7-d coated conductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3692–3694 (1999).
  • (6) Kang, B. W. et al. Comparative study of thickness dependence of critical current density of YBa2Cu3O7-delta on (100) SrTiO3 and on rolling-assisted biaxially textured substrates . J. Mater. Res. 17, 1750-1757 (2002).
  • (7) Emergo, R. L. S. , Wu, J. Z. , Aytug, T., and Christen, D. K. Thickness dependence of superconducting critical current density in vicinal YBa2Cu3O7-delta thick films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 618-620 (2004).
  • (8) Civale, L. et al. Understanding high critical currents in YBa2Cu3O7 thin films and coated conductors. J. Low Temp. Phys. 135, 87-98 (2004).
  • (9) Foltyn, S. R. et al. Overcoming the barrier to 1000 A/cm-width superconducting coatings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 162505 (2005).
  • (10) Kim, S. I. et al. Mechanisms of weak thickness dependence of the critical current density in strong-pinning ex situ metal-organic-deposition-route YBa2Cu3O7-x coated conductors. Supercond. Science and Techn. 19, 968-979 (2006).
  • (11) Takahashi, K. et al. Investigation of thick PLD-GdBCO and ZrO2 doped GdBCO coated conductors with high critical current on PLD-CeO2 capped IBAD-GZO substrate tapes. Supercond. Science and Techn. 19, 924-929 (2006).
  • (12) Foltyn, S. R., Wang, H., Civale, L., Maiorov, B., and Jia, Q. X. The role of interfacial defects in enhancing the critical current density of YBa2Cu3O7-d coatings. Supercond. Science and Techn. 22, 125002 (2009).
  • (13) Solovyov, V. F., Wiesmann, H. J., and Suenaga, M. Nucleation of YBa2Cu3O7 from precursor films using the barium fluoride process. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 2739-2742 (2005).
  • (14) Feldmann, D. M. et al. Mechanisms for enhanced supercurrent across meandered grain boundaries in high-temperature superconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 083912 (2007).
  • (15) Feldmann, D. M. et al. Through-thickness superconducting and normal-state transport properties revealed by thinning of thick film ex situ YBa2Cu3O7-x coated conductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3951-3953 (2003).
  • (16) Tretiatchenko, C. G. and Pan, V. M. A pehonomenological model for the thickness dependence of the critical current density in high temperature superconducting epitaxial films. Supercond. Science and Techn. 22, 045026 (2009).
  • (17) Foltyn, S. R. and Civale, L. in US Department of Energy Superconductivity for Electric Systems Annual Peer Review (Arlington, Virginia, 2006); available at ¡ supercon06/agenda.html¿.
  • (18) Babaei Brojeny, A. A. and Clem, J. R. Self-field effects upon the critical current density of flat superconducting strips. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, 888–895 (2005).
  • (19) Rostila, L., Lehtonen, J. and Mikkonen, R. Self-field reduces critical current density in thick YBCO layers. Physica C 451, 66-70 (2007).
  • (20) Suenaga, M. et al. Thickness dependence of ac losses in circular disks of YBa2Cu3O7 films in perpendicular magnetic fields. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 208-213 (2004).
  • (21) Chen, D.-X. and Goldfarb, R. B. Kim model for magnetization of type-II superconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 66, 2489-2500 (1989).
  • (22) Sanchez, A. and Navau, C. Critical-current density from magnetization loops of finite high-T-c superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14 444-447 (2001).

Figure 1: Transport critical-current density of coated-conductor YBCO films of width 200m as function of film thickness . Points are experimental data obtained from Ref. [1] and solid line is the theoretical calculation.
Figure 2: Critical-current density of coated-conductor YBCO films of width 200m and thickness 1m as function of applied field . The solid line is the theoretically calculated and the dashed to the assumed dependence as function of internal field [Eq. (1)].
Figure 3: Calculated local critical-current density (a) and vertical component of magnetic field (b) as function of horizontal position for a coated-conductor YBCO film of width 200m and thickness 1m (as in Fig. 2) in the film midplane, for appplied field values =0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06T. The thin dotted line in (a) shows the plateau value for this film.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description