[

[

[ Macquarie University Research Centre in Astronomy, Astrophysics & Astrophotonics Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University Australia GRAAL, Université Montpellier 2, France Giant Magellan Telescope,USA NASA Ames Research Center, USA Deep Sky Hunters Collaboration
Abstract

The Kepler Observatory offers unprecedented photometric precision ( 1 mmag) and cadence for monitoring the central stars of planetary nebulae, allowing the detection of tiny periodic light curve variations, a possible signature of binarity. With this precision free from the observational gaps dictated by weather and lunar cycles, we are able to detect companions at much larger separations and with much smaller radii than ever before. We have been awarded observing time to obtain light-curves of the central stars of the six confirmed and possible planetary nebulae in the Kepler field, including the newly discovered object Kn 61, at cadences of both 30 min and 1 min. Of these six objects, we could confirm for three a periodic variability consistent with binarity. Two others are variables, but the initial data set presents only weak periodicities. For the central star of Kn 61, Kepler data will be available in the near future.

Searching for binary central stars of planetary nebulae with Kepler]Searching for binary central stars of planetary nebulae with KeplerD. Douchin et al.]D. Douchin, G. H. Jacoby, O. De Marco, S. B. Howell, M. Kronberger 2011 \volume283 \pagerange119–126 \jnamePlanetary Nebulae: an Eye to the Future \editorsArturo Manchado, Letizia Stanghellini & Detlef Schönberner, eds.

\firstsection

1 Introduction

In order to understand to what extent non-spherical planetary nebulae (PNe) are shaped by binary interactions, a fundamental test is the determination of the PN binary fraction. This is a notoriously difficult quantity to determine. The short period binary fraction is estimated to be 15-20% ([Bond 2000], [Miszalski et al. 2009]). This is biased to binaries with periods shorter than about days.

The field of view of of the Kepler satellite of 14 x 14 square degrees, 4 PNe are known so far and 2 additional possible objects. We seek to detect periodic light variability due to binarity (irradiation effects, eclipses or ellipsoidal variablity) with an amplitude smaller than detectable by ground observations in order to quantify the extent of the bias. If the currently known short period binary fraction of 15-20% is accurate, we should see 1-2 binary PN in our Kepler sample.

2 The PNe in the Kepler field

Figure 1: Kn 61, newly detected PN in the Kepler field. Credit: Gemini Observatory and T. A. Rector (University of Alaska Anchorage). http://www.gemini.edu/node/11656

There are four confirmed PNe in the Kepler field, including one (Pa 5) discovered by D. Patchick in the framework of the Deep Sky Hunters (DSH) project ([Jacoby et al. 2010]). One additional PN candidate, Kn 61 was discovered in the Kepler field by M. Kronberger using DSS false color images also in the context of the DSH search ([Kronberger et al. 2011]), and then imaged by us in March 2011 with a 10 min exposure at the 2.1m NOAO Kitt Peak observatory. A Gemini Observatory image of the object is presented in Fig. 1. From its structure, that is similar to PN A 43, it is classified as a probable PN, although a spectrum of the nebula is required before considering Kn 61 as a confirmed PN. The sixth object, PaTe 1, is classified as possible PN due to its unusual morphology.

Name PN status Period (days) Amplitude (mmag) Notes
NGC 6826 confirmed 0.619 10 Possible binary
NGC 6742 confirmed 0.37: 0.2: Possible periodic variability
Pa 5 confirmed 1.12 4 Possible binary, see [Østensen et al. 2010]
PaTe 1 possible 0.17 2 Possible binary
A 61 confirmed 1.47: 2: Variable
Kn 61 probable - - Recently discovered, no data

Table 1: Preliminary results on the variability properties of the PNe in the Kepler field. The numbers followed by : are to be confirmed. Out of 5 possible or confirmed PNe, 4 show periodic light variations that could be attributed to binarity.

3 Early results and future work

While the smallest detectable amplitude for flux variability is 0.1 mag for ground-based observations, Kepler can detect light variability of about 1 mmag. In Table 1 we show that 4 of the 5 confirmed and possible PNe that have already been observed by Kepler have periodic light variations consistent with binarity (though a proper analysis is required to confirm that the perodic variability of these objects is due to binarity) with amplitudes less than the ground-based detection limit.

We will take thirty minute exposures of these six potential PNe in the Kepler field regularly throughout the year to detect potential long period flux variations. Wind and pulsations effects will be assessed with 1 minute sampling for each object over a single quarter. The advantages of this monitoring with respect to ground-based observations are a higher photometric precision (up to mag for bright stars and well monitored objects) and a longer time baseline with no day, bad weather nor lunar interruptions insuring a constant coverage and a better time sampling.

When the full data set is available, we will be able to impose some limits on how many short binaries may have avoided detection. Even with a small sample of PNe, we can put constraints on the actual short period binary fraction amongst the central stars of PNe.

References

  • [Bond 2000] Bond, H.E. 2000, APN II, 199, 115
  • [De Marco 2009] De Marco, O. 2009, PASP, 121, 316
  • [Douchin et al. 2011] Douchin, D. et al. 2011, these proceedings
  • [Jacoby et al. 2010] Jacoby, G. H. et al. 2010, PASA, 27, 156
  • [Kronberger et al. 2011] Kronberger, M. et al. 2011, these proceedings
  • [Miszalski et al. 2009] Miszalski, B. et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 813
  • [Østensen et al. 2010] Østensen, R. H. et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1470
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
119943
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description