Scalar clouds around KerrSen black holes
Abstract
In this paper, the behaviour of a charged massive scalar test field in the background of a KerrSen black hole is investigated. A kind of stationary solutions, dubbed scalar clouds, are obtained numerically and expressed by the existence lines in the parameter space. We show that for fixed background and a given set of harmonic indices, the mass and charge of the scalar clouds are limited in a finite region in the parameter space of the scalar field. Particularly, the maximum values of the mass and charge of the clouds around extremal KerrSen black holes are independent of the angular velocity of the black hole, whereas those in the extremal KerrNewman background depend on the angular velocity. In addition, it is demonstrated that, as the static limit of KerrSen black hole, GibbonsMaedaGarfinkleHorowitzStrominger black hole can not support scalar cloud.
1 Introduction
Recently, much attention has been paid to scalar clouds around Kerr or KerrNewman black holes (BHs) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. These clouds are described by linearized stationary boundstate solutions with a real frequency
(1) 
where is the critical frequency for superradiant scattering. Fully nonlinear counterparts of the linear clouds have also been shown to yield Kerr or KerrNewman BHs with scalar hair [4, 6, 7, 8]. These hairy BHs may provide distinguishable phenomenology with future observations [9, 10]. Therefore, it is of interest to study the existence and properties of the scalar clouds.
It has long been known that for scalar fields around a nonrotating BH, e.g., electrically charged ReissnerNordström (RN) BH, it is not possible to find a boundstate solution in the superradiant regime. In other words, there is no charged superradiant instability for asymptotically flat charged BHs [11, 12, 13, 14]. Accordingly, one can further conclude that there is no scalar clouds around RN BHs, since bound states with frequency do not exist.
The formation of bound states of scalar field requires that , where denotes the mass of the scalar field. However, as is shown by Hod in a series of studies [15, 16, 17], this condition is not sufficient for massive scalar fields to form bound states in the background of Kerr spacetime and, the condition that is necessary for the existence of a potential well, should also be held. In a recent work [18], we find that the condition for the existence of boundstate solutions of a massive scalar field with charge in the background of a KerrNewman BH is given by
(2) 
where and are the mass and charge of the BH, respectively.
It is known that there are many exotic BH solutions in theories beyond EinsteinMaxwell theory. Therefore, a natural and important question is whether the scalar clouds can form on other rotating BHs. The KerrSen geometry, which is a fourdimensional rotating charged BH solution in the low energy limit of heterotic string field theory [19], has attracted considerable attention in recent years. In fact, it has been found that charged massive scalar field is superradiantly unstable in the KerrSen background [20]. By using an analytical method based on matching the asymptotic forms of the radial functions describing the scalar field, Bernard have shown that nearextremal KerrSen BHs can support scalar clouds [21].
The main goal of present paper is to perform a numerical study of charged massive scalar clouds around KerrSen BHs beyond nearextremal limit. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review briefly the KerrSen spacetime and the separation of variables for the scalar wave function as well as the boundary conditions for the radial equation. In Section 3, the existence line of the scalar clouds is introduced and the parameter space of the scalar field is analyzed with the help of three constraint lines. By the way, we demonstrate that the GibbonsMaedaGarfinkleHorowitzStrominger (GMGHS) BH, which is the static limit of the KerrSen BH, can not support scalar clouds. Then, our main numerical results are shown in Section 4. Finally, we conclude the paper with a brief summary of our results. Throughout the paper, we use natural units in which
2 Charged massive scalar field in KerrSen Spactime
The KerrSen spacetime, expressed in the BoyerLindquist coordinates, is described by the line element
(3)  
where
(4) 
Here, and are the ArnowittDeserMisner mass and the angular momentum per unit mass, respectively. Different from that of KerrNewman BH, the charge of KerrSen BH is introduced through parameter in the following way
(5) 
The Maxwell and dilaton fields are respectively given by
(6) 
(7) 
The (event and inner) horizons of the KerrSen BH are located at the zeros of ,
(8) 
For extremal BHs,
(9) 
which means the following relation should be satisfied for KerrSen BHs,
(10) 
In the static limit(), KerrSen solution reduces to the GMGHS solution [22, 23, 24], while the Kerr solution is recovered in the electrically neutral case ().
We shall consider a charged massive scalar test field in the background of KerrSen spacetime. The equation of motion of the field reads
(11) 
where and are respectively the charge and mass of the scalar field and the electromagnetic potential of the BH is given by Eq.(6). In order to solve this equation, one can decompose the radial and angular parts of the scalar field as usual and express in the form[25, 26]
(12) 
where are the spheroidal harmonics which are the solutions of the following differential equation
(13) 
where, are separation parameters. In the regime , one can expand as
(14) 
where and other coefficients can be found in Refs. [27, 28]. The radial functions are determined by
(15) 
where
(16)  
The radial equation (15) can be also rewritten in the form of a Schrödingerlike wave equation
(17) 
where we have defined and the effective potential
(18) 
Interestingly, although the effective potential is different from that in the KerrNewman background, they show the same asymptotic behaviour at infinity
(19) 
Therefore, following the arguments of Ref.[18], we conclude that the existence condition for the boundstate resonances of the scalar field in the KerrSen spacetime is the same as Eq.(2).
To solve Eq.(15) numerically, boundary conditions at spatial infinity and the event horizon should be appropriately specified. The asymptotic behaviour of a general solution for Eq.(15) at spatial infinity is given by
(20) 
where
(21) 
and . In the present paper, we shall look for the boundstate resonant modes of the field decaying exponentially at infinity, so that we set the coefficient in Eq.(20) [29, 30, 31, 32, 33].
On the other hand, one usually imposes a purely ingoing boundary condition at the event horizon, [34]
(22) 
where is the tortoise coordinate, defined by
(23) 
The critical frequency in this situation reads
(24) 
where and are, respectively, the angular velocity and the electric potential of the BH’s horizon.
In practice, when , the nearhorizon solution of the radial equation (15) can be expressed as a power series
(25) 
where is an arbitrary nonzero constant and can be set to without loss of generality. The coefficients can be found by substituting Eq.(25) into Eq.(15) and solving it order by order in terms of . It is worth pointing out that for the case of extremal BH, the coefficients cannot be solved directly and the power series (25) should be replaced by a Frobenius series.
The boundary conditions specified above will pick out a family of discrete complex frequencies which correspond to the boundstate resonant modes of the scalar field. Generally speaking, these boundstate modes can be divided into three qualitatively distinct types. The first type modes are decaying ones. For such a mode, the real part of the frequency is greater than but the imaginary part is negative. The second type will trigger superradiant instability, due to the fact that the real part of the corresponding frequency is less than for superradiance and the imaginary part is positive. The last type is just we are looking for and these resonant modes, dubbed scalar clouds, are stationary and in equilibrium with the BH because their frequencies are real and precisely equal to the critical frequency .
3 Scanning the parameter space for the existence of the clouds
3.1 Three constraint lines
Since the scalar clouds are bound states with , the critical frequency itself must satisfy the boundstate condition (2), that is
(26) 
Here, without solving the radial equation, we show that a direct consequence of above condition is that, for given values of and , both the mass and charge of the scalar cloud on a given BH are limited in a finite region in the parameter space of the scalar field.^{1}^{1}1Throughout the paper, the mass and charge of the scalar cloud actually refer to the mass and charge of the scalar field, respectively. To this end, we introduce three constraint lines in the plane which are defined as follows:

. Using the definition of , we find that this line is actually a parabola in the plane ^{2}^{2}2Note that, in the KerrNewman case, the corresponding line is a branch of hyperbolic curve., which is given by
(27) where the dimensionless quantity is defined as
(28) 
This is a straight line which can be written in a simpler way
(29) 
This is another straight constraint line in the plane
(30)
It is found that the above three lines intersect at one point
(31) 
Besides, lines (a) and (c) also intersect at another point
(32) 
Line (a) divides the parameter space into two parts: in one part, the effective potential (18) forms a well, while in the other part it does not. On the other hand, line (b) is the boundary between the regions in which the boundstate resonances exist or not. At last, line (c) separates the radial function decaying exponentially at spatial infinity from those growing up. It is worth pointing out that, unlike line (b), the above properties of lines (a) and (c) hold only for the case of .
In figure 1, the three constraint lines are plotted in the plane for the case that , and the KerrSen BH is set to be extremal for the sake of clarity. Clearly, the plane is divided into four regions by the three constraint lines. In region I, , so that no boundstate resonance can be found in this region. On the other hand, although in regions II and IV bound states may exist for some frequencies, it is not difficult to find that these frequencies are definitely not equal to the critical frequency . Actually, condition (26) can only be satisfied in region III. Then, scalar clouds can only exist in this region. Because region III is closed as shown in figure 1, it is expected that the mass and charge of the clouds are confined in a limited scope. In particular, we notice that condition (26) is marginally met at the points and , which suggests that both the maximum and minimum values of the mass and charge of the cloud are determined by the position of the two points.
3.2 The existence lines
From the analysis above, it is easy to realize that the clouds exist only for specific values of the parameters. For instance, given values of the parameters of BH , the harmonic indices and the mass of the scalar field, we search for values of the field’s charge for which the radial function has a nearhorizon behaviour as given by Eq.(25) and an exponentially decaying at infinity by numerically integrating Eq.(15). Indeed, we have to assign a set of specific values of , labelled by the number of nodes of the radial function, in order to obtain a solution with the expected asymptotic behaviour. By changing the value of and keeping the values of and other parameters fixed, another suitable value of is acquired. Repeat the above action, we can take as a function of ,
(33) 
Thus, a curve, called the existence line, in the parameter space of scalar field (i.e., the twodimensional plane) is obtained. Similarly, one can also determine the existence lines in the parameter space of the BH [5]. In Figure 1, we also plot the existence line of the clouds ( the dotted line, marked by ) for the case that the parameters are fixed in the same way as those for the constraint lines. As expected, the existence line is indeed located in region III with the endpoints and .
3.3 No scalar clouds in the GMGHS spacetime
As a simple application, one can use the analysis method described in subsection 3.1 to demonstrate that the GMGHS BH cannot support stationary scalar clouds. For a GMGHS BH, , and combine into one point in the plane. Therefore, the existence line is degenerated and no cloud can be stably distributed on the GMGHS BH.
In fact, from Eq.(24) we have
(34) 
However, from the definition of in (2),
(35) 
which means that no boundstate mode with can be found in this case. Thus, we conclude that GMGHS BH cannot support linear charged massive scalar clouds^{3}^{3}3The author of [21] drew the conclusion that the GMGHS BH can support scalar clouds, based only on the fact that in the case of , where is defined by Eq.(55) in [21]. But just as pointed out in [21], is required for the existence of the cloud. Indeed, we find that when .. This result is consistent with the stability analysis in Ref.[24]. In fact, it was shown in Ref.[35] that scalar clouds can only form on the GMGHS background in the presence of a reflecting mirror surrounding the BH.
4 The existence lines for scalar clouds
In this section, we give our numerical results and exhibit the existence lines of the scalar clouds in the parameter space of both the KerrSen BH and the scalar field.
4.1 The existence lines in the parameter space of the KerrSen BH
Figure 2 shows the existence lines for scalar clouds in the parameter space of KerrSen BH for various values of the chargetomass ratio of the scalar field. The overall trend of these existence lines is similar to that in the KerrNewman case. That is, clouds with charges of the same (opposite) sign as the BH occur for smaller (larger) angular velocities [5]. This result is consistent with our intuition.
From figure 2, we further observe that the existence lines do not reach the line , but end at the points where takes some nonzero value. This feature is also found in the KerrNewman case. However, the minimum value of is , while it is for the clouds on a KerrNewman BH [5]. This difference comes from the different conditions for the absence of naked singularity in KerrNewman and KerrSen spacetimes: For a KerrNewman spacetime, the condition is , while for a KerrSen spacetime, it is .
4.2 The existence lines in the plane
In figure 3, we fix and plot the existence lines for the clouds with for various values of of the KerrSen BH. Here, we also add corresponding constraint lines (a) and (b) to show that the endpoints of the existence lines are indeed the two intersections and for given values of . Interestingly, the existence lines are almost straight lines between the two intersections for different values of . In other words, the existence line is very close to the corresponding constraint line (c). We further show the deviation of the existence line from corresponding line (c) for various values of in figure 4, in which the vertical axis represents the difference , where is evaluated from Eq.(30), but is directly given by the charge of the scalar field. One find that the faster the KerrSen BH rotates, the greater the deviation will be. Consequently, when is small enough, the existence lines of the clouds can be well approximated by Eq.(30), i.e.,
(36) 
The existence lines (dotdashed) for the clouds in extremal KerrSen background are plotted in figure 5 where the charge of the BH is fixed and the harmonic indices take different values, and in figure 6 where is fixed and several different values of are selected. In addition, we also keep track of the ratio along the existence lines in figure 6 and exhibit the result in figure 7. From figure 7, it is found that along the existence line is always less than and as the mass of the cloud approaches to its maximum value. This result is easy to understand because, as is figured out in section 3, the existence line of the scalar cloud is located below the constraint line (c) and the line tends to be tangent to the existence line near the intersection .
For extremal KerrSen BHs, there exists another interesting feature: the maximum values of and for the scalar cloud are independent of which governs the angular velocity of the BH, and more specifically
(37) 
It should be pointed out that the results are radically different from those in the case of extremal KerrNewman BH. As was shown in [18], the maximum values of the cloud mass and charge in the KerrNewman spacetime are given by
(38) 
If the BH is extremal, , then, one finds
(39) 
However, for a given KerrSen BH, the mass and charge of the cloud take their maximum values at as
(40) 
When the KerrSen BH is extremal, from Eq.(9), then Eq.(37) is recovered.
5 Conclusions and discussions
In summary, we have performed a numerical analysis of scalar clouds around KerrSen BHs. These stationary boundstate solutions are characterized by the existence lines in the parameter space for both the KerrSen BH and the scalar field. Similar to the KerrNewman case, the cloud existence lines in the parameter space of the KerrSen BH are confined in a finite region. However, the minimum value of the mass of the BH are different in the two cases.
Furthermore, for a given KerrSen BH, the parameter space of the scalar field is divided into four regions by three simple constraint lines when the harmonic indices are fixed and the existence line can be only located in one of the four regions. Because the region is closed, it is concluded that the mass and charge of the clouds are confined in a limited scope.
In addition, we also find that the maximum values of mass and charge for scalar clouds around extremal KerrSen BHs are independent of of the BH, whereas the corresponding maxima for a KerrNewman BH do depend on . The difference originates from the basic fact that the horizon radius for an extremal KerrSen BH, while in the KerrNewman case. This reflects a difference between lowenergy heterotic string theory and EinsteinMaxwell theory that electric charges in the two theories exert their influences on the metric of the spacetime in different ways.
It is important to note that no stationary scalar clouds can be supported on the KerrSen BH in the static limit (i.e., GMGHS BH), since no bound states with can be found in this situation. However, the socalled ”marginal clouds” with , may be able to exist [36, 37].
Let us mention that the present work is limited to charged massive scalar fields minimally coupled to the KerrSen BHs. For scalar field with a suitable selfinteracting potential [38, 39] and Proca field [31, 40] in the background of a KerrSen BH, stationary bound states may exist even if the equation of motion for the test field is not separable. An appealing question is whether or not the analogue bounds on the parameters exist in these scenarios. Finally, it would be interesting to generalize our results for the linear charged scalar clouds to the fully nonlinear regime of charged scalar hairs [4, 8] in the KerrSen spacetime. These topics deserve new works in the future.
References
References
 [1] Shahar Hod. Kerrnewman black holes with stationary charged scalar clouds. Phys. Rev. D, 90:024051, 2014.
 [2] Shahar Hod. Stationary resonances of rapidlyrotating kerr black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 73(4):2378, 2013.
 [3] Shahar Hod. Stationary scalar clouds around rotating black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 86:104026, 2012.
 [4] Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:221101, 2014.
 [5] Carolina L. Benone, Luís C. B. Crispino, Carlos Herdeiro, and Eugen Radu. Kerrnewman scalar clouds. Phys. Rev. D, 90:104024, 2014.
 [6] Carlos Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Ergosurfaces for kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. D, 89:124018, 2014.
 [7] Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. A new spin on black hole hair. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23(12):1442014, 2014.
 [8] Jorge F.M. Delgado, Carlos A.R. Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi RÃºnarsson. Kerrânewman black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Lett. B, 761:234 – 241, 2016.
 [9] Pedro V. P. Cunha, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi F. Rúnarsson. Shadows of kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:211102, 2015.
 [10] P. V. P. Cunha, J. Grover, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. Runarsson, and A. Wittig. Chaotic lensing around boson stars and Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. D, 94(10):104023, 2016.
 [11] Shahar Hod. Stability of highlycharged reissnernordström black holes to charged scalar perturbations. Phys. Rev. D, 91:044047, 2015.
 [12] Shahar Hod. Stability of the extremal reissnerânordstrÃ¶m black hole to charged scalar perturbations. Phys. Lett. B, 713(4â5):505 – 508, 2012.
 [13] Shahar Hod. Nobomb theorem for charged reissnerânordstrÃ¶m black holes. Phys. Lett. B, 718(4â5):1489 – 1492, 2013.
 [14] Hironobu Furuhashi and Yasusada Nambu. Instability of massive scalar fields in kerrnewman spacetime. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 112(6):983–995, 2004.
 [15] Shahar Hod. On the instability regime of the rotating kerr spacetime to massive scalar perturbations. Phys. Lett. B, 708(3â5):320 – 323, 2012.
 [16] Shahar Hod. The largemass limit of cloudy black holes. Classical Quantum Gravity, 32(13):134002, 2015.
 [17] Shahar Hod. The superradiant instability regime of the spinning kerr black hole. Phys. Lett. B, 758:181 – 185, 2016.
 [18] Yang Huang and DaoJun Liu. Scalar clouds and the superradiant instability regime of kerrnewman black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 94:064030, 2016.
 [19] Ashoke Sen. Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:1006–1009, 1992.
 [20] Haryanto M. Siahaan. Instability of charged massive scalar fields in bound states around kerrâsen black holes. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 24(14):1550102, 2015.
 [21] Canisius Bernard. Stationary charged scalar clouds around black holes in string theory. Phys. Rev. D, 94:085007, 2016.
 [22] G.W. Gibbons and Kei ichi Maeda. Black holes and membranes in higherdimensional theories with dilaton fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 298(4):741 – 775, 1988.
 [23] David Garfinkle, Gary T. Horowitz, and Andrew Strominger. Charged black holes in string theory. Phys. Rev. D, 43:3140–3143, 1991.
 [24] Ran Li. Stability of charged black holes in string theory under charged massive scalar perturbations. Phys. Rev. D, 88:127901, 2013.
 [25] S. Q. Wu and X. Cai. Massive complex scalar field in the kerrâsen geometry: Exact solution of wave equation and hawking radiation. J. Math. Phys., 44(3):1084–1088, 2003.
 [26] K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko. Bifurcation of the quasinormal spectrum and zero damped modes for rotating dilatonic black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 92:064022, 2015.
 [27] F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, editors. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2010. Print companion to [28].
 [28] NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. http://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.0.11 of 20160608. Online companion to [27].
 [29] Sam R. Dolan. Instability of the massive kleingordon field on the kerr spacetime. Phys. Rev. D, 76:084001, 2007.
 [30] João G. Rosa and Sam R. Dolan. Massive vector fields on the schwarzschild spacetime: Quasinormal modes and bound states. Phys. Rev. D, 85:044043, 2012.
 [31] Paolo Pani, Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Emanuele Berti, and Akihiro Ishibashi. Perturbations of slowly rotating black holes: Massive vector fields in the kerr metric. Phys. Rev. D, 86:104017, 2012.
 [32] Paolo Pani. Advanced methods in blackhole perturbation theory. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 28(22n23):1340018, 2013.
 [33] Richard Brito, Vitor Cardoso, and Paolo Pani. Massive spin2 fields on black hole spacetimes: Instability of the schwarzschild and kerr solutions and bounds on the graviton mass. Phys. Rev. D, 88:023514, 2013.
 [34] Vitor Cardoso, Óscar J. C. Dias, José P. S. Lemos, and Shijun Yoshida. Blackhole bomb and superradiant instabilities. Phys. Rev. D, 70:044039, 2004.
 [35] Ran Li, Junkun Zhao, Xinghua Wu, and Yanming Zhang. Scalar clouds in charged stringy black holemirror system. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(4):142, 2015.
 [36] Marco O. P. Sampaio, Carlos Herdeiro, and Mengjie Wang. Marginal scalar and proca clouds around reissnernordström black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 90:064004, 2014.
 [37] Juan Carlos Degollado and Carlos A. R. Herdeiro. Stationary scalar configurations around extremal charged black holes. Gen Relativ Gravitation, 45(12):2483–2492, 2013.
 [38] Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi Rúnarsson. Kerr black holes with selfinteracting scalar hair: Hairier but not heavier. Phys. Rev. D, 92:084059, 2015.
 [39] Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi RÃºnarsson. Nonlinear qclouds around kerr black holes. Phys. Lett. B, 739:302 – 307, 2014.
 [40] Paolo Pani, Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Emanuele Berti, and Akihiro Ishibashi. Blackhole bombs and photonmass bounds. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:131102, 2012.