Relaxing the Electroweak Scale: the Role of Broken dS Symmetry

Relaxing the Electroweak Scale: the Role of Broken dS Symmetry

Subodh P. Patil    Pedro Schwaller 1) Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Geneva, 24 Quai Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva-4, Switzerland

2) Theory Division, PH-TH Case C01600, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva-23, Switzerland
July 15, 2019

Recently, a novel mechanism to address the hierarchy problem has been proposed Graham:2015cka (), where the hierarchy between weak scale physics and any putative ‘cutoff’ is translated into a parametrically large field excursion for the so-called relaxion field, driving the Higgs mass to values much less than through cosmological dynamics. In its simplest incarnation, the relaxion mechanism requires nothing beyond the standard model other than an axion (the relaxion field) and an inflaton. In this note, we critically re-examine the requirements for successfully realizing the relaxion mechanism and point out that parametrically larger field excursions can be obtained for a given number of e-folds by simply requiring that the background break exact de Sitter invariance. We discuss several corollaries of this observation, including the interplay between the upper bound on the scale and the order parameter associated with the breaking of dS symmetry, and entertain the possibility that the relaxion could play the role of a curvaton. We find that a successful realization of the mechanism is possible with as few as e-foldings, albeit with a reduced cutoff GeV for a dark QCD axion and outline a minimal scenario that can be made consistent with CMB observations.

preprint: CERN-PH-TH-2015-179

I Introductory remarks

Interacting scalar fields are notoriously sensitive to the heaviest particles they couple to. Since the discovery of the Higgs boson with a relatively light mass of 125 GeV Aad:2012tfa (); Chatrchyan:2012ufa (), explanations that dynamically account for the apparent hierarchy between the electroweak (EW) scale and any new physics that is presumed to complete the weak sector of the standard model111Such as low energy supersymmetry and large/ warped extra dimensions for completions that incorporate gravity, and composite models for completions which become relevant at lower energies. appear to be in tension with atomic physics and collider constraints excepting rather tuned regions of parameter space. This has led to anthropic arguments gaining currency as a plausible alternative, although as of yet no convincing solution to the problem of how to define probabilities for observers and observables is available. Evidently, novel solutions to the hierarchy problem that circumvent current low energy constraints need no further justification.

Recently, the authors Graham:2015cka () have proposed a mechanism where the hierarchy between weak scale physics and the new physics scale is paraphrased into requiring a parametrically large field excursion for a field that couples to the Higgs.222For precursors in this direction, see Abbott:1984qf (); Dvali:2003br (); Dvali:2004tma (). In order to keep any new hierarchies introduced by this new sector to be technically natural Wilson:1973jj (); 'tHooft:1979bh (), an obvious choice would be for this field to be axion-like, hence a relaxion. The potential for the relaxion coupled to the singlet component of the Higgs is given by


where the ellipses denote higher order terms333The expansion is arranged in this way because it is technically natural for to be small, since a discrete shift symmetry is recovered in the limit where vanishes. We will address the relevance of the higher order terms in the next section. in , and is the ( dependent) vacuum expectation value of the Higgs. We presume the relaxion to begin at very large field values wherein the Higgs has a naturally large (and positive) mass squared. The relaxion evolves under the influence of the background cosmology which has to last long enough for to scan a sufficient range in field space to eventually break EW symmetry at . Primordial inflation provides a natural context for this evolution to take place. As soon as the relaxion expectation value drops below , the Higgs starts to acquire a non-zero expectation value and a periodic potential for is generated by instanton effects whose scale in the EW vacuum is set by


where is the (non-perturbatively generated) pion decay constant and is the pion mass. Since grows linearly with the quark masses, this term grows in proportion to .

Figure 1: Schematic behaviour of the relaxion potential above and below .

Under the approximation that is slow rolling, it will get trapped in a local minimum once the barriers induced by the instanton potential are large enough to compensate the slope of the potential, which occurs when


Parameterising the prefactor of the periodic potential as , where  GeV, it follows that


Since small values of are technically natural, of order one can be obtained for very large values of the cut-off , by adjusting accordingly.

Thus far we have taken the cosmological history of the model for granted. Obviously, one could arrange initial conditions for such that it starts right above the region where the square of the Higgs mass changes sign. However in that case one would merely be trading the fine-tuning of the weak scale for a fine-tuning of initial conditions. For this mechanism to naturally explain the weak scale, one has to instead demand that the field has enough time to settle into the minimum from virtually any initial value which satisfies , in addition to requiring that the temperature be below the scale to guarantee that the instanton potential appears as the Higgs acquires a non-zero expectation value. Consequently, naturalness forces us to require that the relaxion undergo a minimum field excursion of over the course of early universe evolution. In Graham:2015cka () (henceforth GKR) the authors implicitly considered the de Sitter (dS) limit of an inflationary background wherein . In this case the relaxion rapidly settles onto the attractor solution


where the latter follows from the fact that the number of e-folds goes as as on a dS background. Therefore a field excursion requires


where we recall from (1) that has dimensions of mass. Since is bounded from below by a ratio of two largely independent scales, it should be immediately clear that can vastly exceed the minimum number of e-folds required to solve the horizon problem, especially considering is an a priori parametrically small quantity. Among the more phenomenologically viable models considered in Graham:2015cka () anywhere between and e-folds of inflation was required444A simplified way to see this is as follows: The stopping condition for the relaxion can be written as , using and . Furthermore so that the inflaton dominates over the relaxion energy density. Combining these constraints in (6) one finds . Taking  GeV then for example one finds . , admittedly a tall ask for any inflationary sector and most likely reintroducing fine tuning issues into that sector555One of the constraining requirements on inflation in the context of the relaxion mechanism is that it does not permit eternal inflation (so as to preclude the possibility of reintroducing anthropic arguments). From a model builders perspective, this is in tension with obtaining such a large number of e-folds, since models that typically do so tend to be of the chaotic variety in an eternally inflating regime..

In the following section we will review the requirements of successfully realizing the relaxion mechanism and in particular, we will critically re-examine the role played by the symmetries of the background. The main result is that breaking exact de Sitter symmetry parametrically reduces the required number of e-foldings for the relaxion to undergo the requisite field excursion, greatly alleviating constraints on inflationary model building. In situations where the order parameter666Locally, de Sitter space possesses a time-like Killing vector. Inflationary cosmology is the result of spontaneously breaking this symmetry by a slow rolling background, and the curvature perturbation on constant inflaton slices relates to the Goldstone mode that non-linearly realizes this symmetry Cheung:2007st (); Low:2001bw (). The slow roll parameter is an order parameter Chluba:2015bqa () in the precise sense that the action for the curvature perturbation is an expansion in powers of and its derivatives, which becomes trivial in the limit that the symmetry is restored. associated with breaking dS symmetry – – is non-trivial, we will show that


where . In the limit the quantity in the parentheses is the very definition of , cf. (6). An inflating background for which implies for a dark QCD relaxion for example, a far more manageable proposition than requiring e-folds of exactly de Sitter inflation777Presumably, the reference Graham:2015cka () did not intend this limit, yet in neglecting corrections to background quantities over many Hubble times one implicitly works in such a limit..

The source of the parametric enhancement in field excursion once exact dS symmetry is broken can be understood from the attractor solution for the relaxion, which we will shortly derive as


where the ellipses denote terms in the exponent that grow with the time variation of (serving only to enhance the field excursion per e-fold for backgrounds where monotonically increases, as is always the case during slow roll inflation). Evidently, parametrically more field excursion occurs on backgrounds that break dS symmetry with a larger value of . This parametric enhancement can be understood intuitively from the fact that de Sitter space is a maximally symmetric spacetime upon which freely propagating fields will have homogeneous attractor solutions that are uniformly sourced by the background geometry. Breaking this maximal symmetry results in additional source terms from the background on top of that already present in the effective potential of the field, enhancing the amount of field excursion per e-folding. Although this additional sourcing is nominally a small local correction, it integrates over many e-folds to substantially correct the bound (6) into (7). Another way of intuitively understanding this parametric enhancement is to realize that there is an obvious limit in which an infinite amount of field excursion is obtained per e-fold – when the background asymptotes to Minkowski space. Breaking dS symmetry merely allows one to interpolate between these maximally symmetric limiting cases, where the field excursion per efold (for a fixed unit time scale ) is enhanced as per (8).

In the subsequent sections, we first re-examine the model requirements for getting enough relaxion field excursion on a background that breaks dS symmetry. We then rederive the various constraints imposed by requiring a successful realization of the relaxion mechanism, finding an interesting interplay between the order parameter and maximum possible cutoff . Furthermore, we find that accounting for corrections to the Hubble factor during inflation obliges us to discard the inflaton as the source of the curvature perturbations for regions of parameter space where , necessitating some other method to generate them. The curvaton mechanism offers a plausibly (and technically) natural mechanism, for which we will audition the relaxion itself for the role. We conclude by discussing various possible generalizations and cosmological aspects of the relaxion mechanism.

Ii Cosmological relaxation revisited

The relaxion mechanism depends on the background cosmology in several crucial respects, and so it pays to re-examine how one can satisfy all that is required of the relaxion field in as general terms as possible. The primary requirement is for enough field excursion to have been executed over the course of early universe evolution. An anxiety expressed in Graham:2015cka () is that this apparently requires a very large number of e-folds (at least depending on the model construction). In what follows, we demonstrate that this is an artefact of deriving various bounds without accounting for finite changes in the Hubble factor during inflation. Incorporating these corrections greatly ameliorates the situation in that executes a parametrically larger excursion on a quasi de Sitter background.

ii.1 Field excursions and the breaking of dS symmetry

We recall that the most general potential for the relaxion coupled to the singlet component of the Higgs is given (above the EW phase transition) by


where the ellipses denote higher order terms in . Before the Higgs acquires a vev, the equation of motion for the spatial zero mode of the relaxion on an FRW background is given by


It is only in the regime where that one can neglect the effective mass term in the above relative to the constant driving term. Given that for the majority of the evolution of the relaxion, we clearly cannot avoid accounting for the former. Furthermore, we note that under the field redefinition


and the choice , we can redefine away the linear term completely to arrive at the potential


highlighting the manner in which the relaxion mechanism now intertwines the hierarchy problem with the bare cosmological constant problem888Since we require the combined contributions to the cosmological constant including that which comes from the inflaton sector to vanish (or be rendered gravitationally inert e.g. Dvali:2002pe (); Dvali:2007kt (); Aghababaie:2003wz (); Burgess:2011va ()) close to the EW vacuum.. In the following however, we simply posit the vanishing of and set for economy of discussion since we are only interested in deriving order of magnitude bounds. We demonstrate the persistence of the conclusions of this section accounting for higher order corrections to the potential in the appendix.

Writing the FRW scale factor as and reparametrizing time so that is our new clock through the relation , the equation of motion for a minimally coupled (test999We shall later enforce the consistency of this assumption by requiring that the relaxion energy density be sub-dominant throughout.) scalar field on an arbitrary FRW background with the potential is given by


with primes denoting derivatives with respect to and where by definition


The above can readily be integrated as


so that (13) becomes


We stress that the above expression is completely general. Given (9) with we find that on an arbitrary FRW background, the relaxion evolves according to


Given as a function of we can readily integrate the above. The exact solution for the attractor on an arbitrary background is given by


so that in the case where is a (not necessarily small) constant , we can immediately conclude that


which the limit where corresponds to the previously advertised expression (8). Furthermore, we can integrate the above to find


The expression (18) corresponds to the attractor solution, neglecting the irrelevant (exponentially) decaying mode. From the above, we can immediately justify our first claim– that backgrounds that deviate from the de Sitter limit () effect parametrically larger field excursions:


where the inequality arises from (18) so that as claimed, incorporating any time dependence in (recalling that it is a positive, monotonically growing parameter during slow roll inflation) serves only to further enhance the field excursion per e-fold (21).

ii.2 Cosmological bounds on the relaxion

Naturalness requirements imply that the relaxion mechanism cannot resort to fine tuning of the initial conditions. In practice this means that we must ensure that the cosmological evolution be such that the relaxion scans a sufficiently large field range as to make its initial displacement immaterial101010On an expanding background, memory of the initial velocities are rapidly lost as the solution settles onto an attractor trajectory within a few e-folds.. Therefore from (9) we infer that we must require the total field excursion be such that , so that the minimum number of e-folds required is given by


which follows directly from (20). In the limit the right hand side of the above uniformly converges to which was the original (formidable) bound uncovered in Graham:2015cka (). Here and in the following we will assume that is constant. Incorporating the time variation of into our analysis only enhances (21), such that bounds obtained using are conservative. Very clearly, we see that allowing for the fact that the background geometry breaks maximal symmetry logarithmically alleviates the number of e-folds required to effect the requisite field excursion. For , the required number of e-folds simplifies to


where in neglecting terms of order , (23) is a slightly stronger bound than (22).

One can also recast the constraint on the minimal number of e-folds required into an upper bound on the Hubble scale at the end of inflation. From the solution (15) we find that


where is now the total number of e-folds. This implies via (22) that


where the last expression again is valid for .

The attractor solution for the relaxion (20) was derived under the assumption that could be treated as a test field over the background sourced by inflation. For this to consistently be true throughout the cosmological evolution, its energy density should be negligible compared to the energy density in the inflation sector, which is given by . Using , the result (20) and we find


Requiring that , it follows that will always be true if 111111This bound follows from the resulting quadratic inequality for , which will always be satisfied provided the associated quadratic form have no real roots.


The conditions (25) and (27) provide the strongest bounds on the model. GKR further require that the field slow-rolls and that the evolution of is dominated by classical fluctuations, and indeed those constraints are also easily satisfied here. More precisely, implies . This can be satisfied by choosing sufficiently low, however since now drops over time, this constraint will be satisfied eventually, and furthermore it is not clear whether it is a necessary condition Graham:2015cka (). In addition the barriers that eventually stop the rolling of (once the Higgs acquires a vev) will only develop if , where the stopping condition has to be satisfied121212Note that we only require before EW symmetry breaking, and could be larger than at the beginning of inflation provided it eventually drops below (cf. (24)). Although this is a reasonable possibility that doesn’t introduce particularly severe tuning of the initial conditions, it is an extra ingredient that we avoid for the sake of conservativeness..

We will now consider different limits of (27). Note that during inflation we always have , by definition. The two cases that we can immediately distinguish are , which includes the exact dS limit , and , where the constraints (23) and (25) simplify (and where the requisite number of e-folds is vastly reduced).

Consider first the case which permits us to ignore the first term in the left hand side of (27). We immediately find


Utilizing the stopping condition (for simplicity we consider ), can be eliminated to obtain


For , this implies for and for , which is around the maximally allowed value for in the GKR models. Provided the axion decay constant is commensurate with , the bounds just derived are accurate up to factors of order unity. The number of e-folds required for the scenario to work in this context is then


using , i.e. the conservative (cf. footnote 12) maximal allowed value, and as before.

Now consider the opposite limit, . Here the second term on the LHS of (27) can be neglected, resulting in


The term in brackets is less than unity in the regime we are considering. Furthermore using , we find . This is the same constraint that GKR obtain, however here we now see that a careful adjustment of and (for a given ) is required to actually saturate it. Inserting we find


is maximised when (29) and (32) intersect. Setting this happens for .

Figure 2: Left: Upper bounds on as function of . The solid red (blue) contours correspond to  GeV (100 GeV) respectively, the region consistent with (27) lies within the triangular shapes. Dashed (dotted) lines correspond to (). Right: Allowed region for  GeV, with grey lines showing . The light (darker) orange shaded region has ( MeV), and we choose such that is satisfied for  GeV. The parameter is set everywhere by . In the region to the right of the vertical dashed line, a curvaton field is needed to satisfy (35).

Fig. 2 shows the constraint (27) in the plane for different choices of and . The scale can be increased either by increasing , which however in GKR is bounded by  GeV, or by increasing , which is subject to the constraint (unless one allows for the (relatively mild) additional requirement that the dynamics be such that eventually falls below as approaches ). In the right figure we also show for the  GeV case, which clearly highlights the correlation between the achievable cut-off and the required number of e-folds. Here we have chosen such that is satisfied everywhere in the allowed regions, such that the field evolves classically throughout.

ii.3 Observational Constraints

Another constraint on the model comes from demanding successful reheating of the universe after inflation. An upper estimate for the reheating temperature is . Big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) puts an absolute lower bound of  MeV. Successful baryogenesis and dark matter production suggest  TeV, however specific models can realise this also with a lower . Eqn. (25) gives an upper bound on , which however is always weaker than the constraints arising from (27).

Important constraints also arise from the inflaton sector from the dual requirement that inflation never be in the eternally inflating regime131313So as not to re-introduce a mechanism for anthropic selection, as per the requirements of Graham:2015cka ()., and that eventually, inflation produces the observed amplitude of curvature perturbations. The first requirement implies that quantum fluctuations always be subdominant to fluctuations arising from classical rolling. That is


where we denote the inflaton as . This is simply the statement that the inflaton roll further in one Hubble time than a characteristic stochastic field fluctuation (set by the temperature associated with the de Sitter horizon in units where the Boltzmann constant Spradlin:2001pw ()). Through the equivalent definition , the above immediately implies that throughout inflation,


One can also recognize in the above that this is precisely the quantity that is inferred through CMB observations as Ade:2015xua ():


where starred quantities indicate that these are evaluated at the time some fixed comoving scale (typically taken to correspond to COBE normalization at Mpc) exits the horizon. The bound (34) is under most tension at the beginning of inflation. If one demands that (35) is satisfied, it implies


However at the same time it is important to note that, given the low inflation scale required by the relaxion scenario , the constraint (35) can only be satisfied by having , reintroducing the fine-tuning problem in the inflaton sector that we tried to avoid in the first place. Making things worse, while the amplitude of the CMB anisotropies can be fit with such a tiny , the spectral tilt Ade:2015xua () would then require , which is a highly non-trivial additional requirement on the inflationary sector.

An alternative mechanism to generate the CMB anisotropies is required in the parameter space to the right of the dashed vertical line in Fig. 2, if for example we want to keep . A plausiblecandidate for such a mechanism is offered by the curvaton scenario Lyth:2001nq (); Lyth:2002my (), which can be engineered to be technically natural for example by having other axions play the role of the curvaton Dimopoulos:2003ii (); Dimopoulos:2003az (); Bozza:2003pj () (see however Mazumdar:2015pta () for concerns about axion over production during reheating). They are merely required to be light, energetically sub-dominant during inflation, uncoupled (or weakly coupled) to anything other than the radiation bath into which it subsequently decays, and have a mass around the minimum of its potential such that where is the Hubble factor during post-inflationary radiation domination. The spectral index generated by the curvaton is given by


To obtain a Gaussian spectrum the curvaton has to be sufficiently displaced from its local minimum () at the time when the observed CMB modes cross the horizon, i.e. , and furthermore that the curvaton energy density is sub-dominant to radiation immediately prior to its decay and that the decay occurs over a small window relative to a Hubble time Lyth:2001nq (); Lyth:2002my (). The amplitude of the power spectrum of the curvature perturbations sourced by the curvaton in the regime where is given by


where is the fraction of the curvaton energy density relative to radiation density just before it decays in the radiation dominated epoch Lyth:2001nq (); Lyth:2002my (). We wish to emphasize in the context of (37) that in general and that the precise predictions of the curvaton scenario supplemented with the relaxion mechanism will also depend on the details of the inflaton sector. However it should be clear that provided inflation can also be arranged to be technically natural, it should be possible to supplement the relaxion mechanism with an additional axionic curvaton sector preserving naturalness and simultaneously fitting to CMB observations. Taken together, this gives a minimal realization of the relaxion mechanism which is in agreement with current cosmological data. The even more minimal possibility that the relaxion itself plays the role of the curvaton is explored in the appendix.

We conclude this particular subsection by noting that thus far, we have only considered inflating backgrounds, i.e. . Given that our analysis was completely general, one could have also asked whether can roll into its minimum during ordinary radiation or matter dominated expansion. Those phases are characterised by for matter domination and for radiation domination, corresponding to and , respectively. The constraints on the parameter space in this case simply follow from (25) and (29) and are and . A priori these scenarios don’t seem to be much more constrained than those with . Hence for models where can be increased above the weak scale like the CHAIN scenario Espinosa:2015eda (), this possibility should also be explored. In this context the proposal of Hardy:2015laa (), namely to use a hidden sector with a larger temperature as an alternative to an inflationary background for the relaxion, is noteworthy.

ii.4 Concrete models

In the above discussion we have not explicitly specified which realisation of the relaxion mechanism is being considered. The QCD scenario of GKR is not viable due to predicting a too large strong CP angle, and the modified version to fix this problem requires  GeV, such that only scenarios with tiny will be viable, due to the combination of the reheating constraint with from (25).

Instead the model with an additional strongly coupled dark sector is potentially viable over a larger range of values of . There the scale is set by , where is the dark sector pion decay constant, and are additional Yukawa couplings and is the mass of a new fermion which is of order of the weak scale. Taking all parameters near the weak scale,  GeV is possible.

Supplementing this scenario with a curvaton we can arrive at a minimal scenario that is compatible with observations. Choosing the curvaton mass sufficiently small we get , which agrees with observations for , and amplitude of perturbations, can easily be matched to the observed value. This scenario allows of order few hundred TeV, while being consistent with CMB observations. A more elaborate inflationary sector seems to be required to further increase the cut-off scale, while remaining in agreement with observations.

As mentioned above, in Espinosa:2015eda () a variation of the relaxion mechanism, the CHAIN mechanism, was presented which works even for . This is achieved by modifying the stopping condition to , where is a new small (technically natural) parameter (and we take ), which is constrained by . Preforming the same steps leading to (29), we find


where we have eliminated using . Since is again the weak scale here, we find the same parametric behaviour as in the GKR scenario, namely that exceptionally small values of are required to increase the cutoff beyond  GeV. In practice the constraints on the scenario of Espinosa:2015eda () are probably stronger, since there is an additional scalar field which also slow rolls and for which similar constraints as for have to be satisfied.

In the CHAIN scenario the criterion for the instanton potential to be present is easy to satisfy even in an ordinary radiation or matter dominated universe, only requiring , or equivalently , since the barriers now appear at the scale . Therefore it seems possible that the CHAIN relaxation happens during a radiation or matter dominated period of the early universe. If this is not followed by a period of inflation, one then faces the problem that different Hubble patches of the visible universe will have different (but similar) values of , due to quantum spreading of the relaxion Graham:2015cka (); Espinosa:2015eda (). Any scenario where there is no inflation after the relaxion stops evolving, or where the end of inflation coincides with the relaxion settling in a local minimum, will have to address this issue.

Iii Concluding remarks

In paraphrasing the electro-weak hierarchy into a super cut-off field excursion for the relaxion, the GKR mechanism plausibly addresses the hierarchy problem in a technically natural manner. One of the drawbacks of the original scenario was the astronomical number of e-folds apparently required of the inflationary sector (no less than e-folds depending on the model construction) in order to effect enough field excursion for the relaxion. In this note, we uncovered how incorporating corrections to background quantities over many Hubble times alleviates the required number of e-folds in situations where the background breaks dS symmetry. We observed an interesting interplay between the order parameter associated with breaking dS symmetry and the maximum cutoff attainable in a given construction. In comparison with the findings of Graham:2015cka (), we find that one can reduce the required number of e-folds down to order for a dark QCD axion with GeV, at the expense of having to lower the cutoff to  GeV. The cutoff increases with while the number of e-folds scales as , therefore increasing by an order of magnitude increases the required number of e-folds by a factor .

An additional price paid for lowering the number of e-folds is that the inflaton can no longer be the source of the observed density perturbations for a large region of parameter space. This situation is apparently no worse than in Graham:2015cka () where although the amplitude of the perturbations can be fit, appears to be much closer to unity than allowed by data. We instead propose the curvaton mechanism as viable source of the density perturbations, which for can be made to fit both the amplitude and spectrum of the CMB anisotropies. One preserves technical naturalness by default if the curvaton is also an axionic degree of freedom and provides a minimal framework to be in agreement with astrophysical observations. As we show in the appendix, the relaxion itself can plausibly play the role of the curvaton at the expense of introducing fine tuning of initial conditions. Devising a technically natural inflaton plus curvaton sector remains a task for future investigations.

Models with a dark QCD near or below the weak scale seem to be preferred for the minimal relaxion mechanism to work, and a question that arises immediately in this context is why the scale of the dark sector should be close to the weak scale. One possibility to dynamically connect the scales is provided by approximate infrared fixed points in the running of the gauge couplings Bai:2013xga (). This construction requires additional states in the few TeV range, which could also serve as portals to allow entropy transfer from the dark QCD to the visible sector. Possible collider signatures in that case include displaced decays of dark mesons or glueballs Juknevich:2009gg (); Craig:2015pha (); Curtin:2015fna (), emerging jets Schwaller:2015gea (), or other typical signatures of hidden valley models Strassler:2006im (), depending on the exact mass scales involved. Since the new states in the hidden sector can not decouple without spoiling the relaxion mechanism (unless additional relaxion fields are introduced Espinosa:2015eda ()), a careful study of the expected collider signals and the effects on electroweak precision observables would be valuable.

Another interesting aspect concerns the cosmology of these models. Besides the obvious task of constructing viable (and natural) inflationary backgrounds, the generation of the observed baryon asymmetry becomes a relevant problem now. Presumably a reheating temperature below is preferred to prevent the relaxion from evolving after the end of inflation. Cold baryogenesis GarciaBellido:1999sv (); Krauss:1999ng (); Tranberg:2003gi (); Servant:2014bla () is an obvious candidate mechanism for producing an asymmetry in this environment, and it would be interesting to determine whether it can be implemented without introducing new fine tuning problems.

We wish to thank B. Batell, C. Burgess, A. Delgado, P. Fox, G. Giudice, M. McCullough, A. Pomarol, I. Sawicki, D. Stolarski, A. Strumia and A. Weiler for useful and inspiring discussions, and B. Batell, G. Giudice and A. Riotto for helpful comments on the manuscript. PS would also like to acknowledge support from the Munich Institute for Astro- and Particle Physics (MIAPP) of the DFG cluster of excellence ”Origin and Structure of the Universe”, where part of this work was completed.

Appendix A Field redefinitions and higher order corrections

The relaxion potential as introduced in Graham:2015cka () is an expansion in powers of , where is the scale that characterizes the UV completion of the theory. Therefore, the full potential can be written as


For small field values this is clearly dominated by the linear term, however the relaxion mechanism can only be considered compatible with naturalness if we allow for field excursions , in which case all terms in the potential could become equally important. To see that the linear term accurately captures the dynamics over a field range approximating , it is useful to expand the field around the EW symmetry breaking field value as , since we are interested in the dynamics of near that point. The potential for then becomes


where now the higher order terms are negligible (since ) and where contributes to the bare cosmological constant and . We are therefore justified in only considering the linear term for the evolution of in the region we are interested in, namely near . The higher order terms in the potential can be absorbed in a redefinition of and . We note that requiring that be finite is readily conceivable if the UV completion describes weakly coupled dynamics of the putative UV degrees of freedom.

Appendix B The relaxion as a curvaton

We had previously observed that for backgrounds for with , the curvature perturbations have to be generated by some mechanism other than the standard inflationary one. The curvaton mechanism offers a viable candidate, and it is natural to ask whether the relaxion could play the part of the curvaton.

As detailed in Lyth:2001nq (); Lyth:2002my (), the curvaton mechanism relies upon an effectively light spectator field during inflation (which acquires a close to scale invariant spectrum by default), which begins to oscillate around the minimum of its potential during radiation domination (i.e. after reheating). In order for a scale invariant, Gaussian spectrum of curvature perturbations to be generated141414This generation occurs via isocurvature perturbations (corresponding to the curvaton) sourcing curvature perturbations through the presence of non-adiabatic pressure perturbations during radiation domination. Consequently, the spectral properties of the curvaton spectrum imprint onto the curvature perturbation as the curvaton decays. three conditions have to be satisfied: i) the Hubble factor during radiation domination be such that so that the relaxion be able to oscillate around its minimum; ii) that as the modes that we observe in the CMB exited the horizon, so that the perturbations remain weakly coupled (i.e. Gaussian) and iii) that the curvaton be coupled to the radiative degrees of freedom at tree level so that it can subsequently decay efficiently Lyth:2001nq ().

The last condition is trivially satisfied since the relaxion by definition couples to gauge bosons (be they in visible or dark sectors). The first condition neccessitates that in addition to inflation ending before the relaxion finds its minimum, that EW symmetry breaking occurs before BBN, and that necessarily for the barriers to have formed in the first place,


This can be shown to impose a tuning of initial conditions for such that is specified to percent level precision, evidently the price to pay for not having to introduce additional degrees of freedom. Furthermore we require that at this time so that the relaxion can oscillate around its minimum. That this is plausible can immediately be inferred from the fact that once EW symmetry breaking has been effected, fluctuations of the relaxion around its metastable minimum (parametrized as ) will have an effective mass of


which follows directly from (1) when and the relation (3) presuming the natural value for the axion decay constant . Given that the implied curvaton mass ranges from GeV if the relaxion is the QCD axion ( GeV) or GeV if it is a dark QCD axion ( GeV), we see immediately that this is far above the upper bound on set by (42) GeV. Hence we conclude that efficient conversion of the isocurvature perturbations is possible in the radiation dominated phase with the relaxion as the curvaton.

The requirement that during inflation ensures that the subsequent curvature perturbations will be close to Gaussian Lyth:2001nq () consistently allows for the amplitude for the power spectrum (38) to be fit to observations as


where is the fraction of the curvaton energy density to radiation immediately prior to its decay. Since we require throughout inflation, we see that if . From (29) we see that for a dark QCD axion GeV implies that GeV, and that since , the condition is satisfied for almost all of the permissible field range. In order to ensure the correct normalization (45) requires however that whatever the scales and during inflation, has to have the precise value (during radiation domination) such that (45) is satisfied. This can only be viewed as another source of tuning in addition to the tuning of initial conditions required by satsifying (42) throughout. As discussed in Toni (), this mechanism is further constrained by the fact that unless an additional mechanism halts the relaxion immediately as it encounters its first local minimum, is expected to be at least of order since this is the field displacement in the relaxion potential equivalent to the energy displacement implicit in the formulae above. This means that since


one has yet further fine tuning of initial conditions (now in the inflaton sector) such that the COBE pivot scale we see in the CMB must have exited the horizon when the right hand side above is of the right order. As discussed below (29) for low scale cut-off models (with ) one can plausibly accomplish this with enough tuning of parameters and initial conditions, however this rapidly becomes impossible for models with very high cut-offs (i.e. very close to dS, cf. (29)).


  • (1) P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran, “Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale,” arXiv:1504.07551 [hep-ph].
  • (2) S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012) [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]].
  • (3) G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012) [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]].
  • (4) K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, “The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion,” Phys. Rept. 12 (1974) 75.
  • (5) G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135.
  • (6) L. F. Abbott, “A Mechanism for Reducing the Value of the Cosmological Constant,” Phys. Lett. B 150 (1985) 427.
  • (7) G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin, “Cosmic attractors and gauge hierarchy,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 063501 [hep-th/0304043].
  • (8) G. Dvali, “Large hierarchies from attractor vacua,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025018 [hep-th/0410286].
  • (9) C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,” JHEP 0803, 014 (2008) [arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]].
  • (10) I. Low and A. V. Manohar, “Spontaneously broken space-time symmetries and Goldstone’s theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 101602 (2002) [hep-th/0110285].
  • (11) J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S. P. Patil, “Features and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observables: Theory and Observation,” IJMPD Vol. 24, No. 8 1530023 (2015) [arXiv:1505.01834 [astro-ph.CO]].
  • (12) G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Shifman, “Diluting cosmological constant in infinite volume extra dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 044020 (2003) [hep-th/0202174].
  • (13) G. Dvali, S. Hofmann and J. Khoury, “Degravitation of the cosmological constant and graviton width,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 084006 (2007) [hep-th/0703027 [HEP-TH]].
  • (14) Y. Aghababaie, C. P. Burgess, S. L. Parameswaran and F. Quevedo, “Towards a naturally small cosmological constant from branes in 6-D supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 680, 389 (2004) [hep-th/0304256].
  • (15) C. P. Burgess and L. van Nierop, “Technically Natural Cosmological Constant From Supersymmetric 6D Brane Backreaction,” Phys. Dark Univ. 2, 1 (2013) [arXiv:1108.0345 [hep-th]].
  • (16) M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich, “Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,” hep-th/0110007.
  • (17) P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck Collaboration], “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,” arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO].
  • (18) D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, “Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B 524, 5 (2002) [hep-ph/0110002].
  • (19) D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli and D. Wands, “The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 023503 (2003) [astro-ph/0208055].
  • (20) K. Dimopoulos, G. Lazarides, D. Lyth and R. Ruiz de Austri, “The Peccei-Quinn field as curvaton,” JHEP 0305, 057 (2003) [hep-ph/0303154].
  • (21) K. Dimopoulos, D. H. Lyth, A. Notari and A. Riotto, “The Curvaton as a pseudoNambu-Goldstone boson,” JHEP 0307, 053 (2003) [hep-ph/0304050].
  • (22) V. Bozza, M. Gasperini, M. Giovannini and G. Veneziano, “The axion as a curvaton in string cosmology models,” in G. Miele and G. Longo, “Thinking, observing and mining the universe. Proceedings, International Conference, Sorrento, Italy, September 22-27, 2003,”
  • (23) A. Mazumdar and S. Qutub, “Non-perturbative over-production of axion-like-particles (ALPs) via derivative interaction,” arXiv:1508.04136 [hep-ph].
  • (24) J. R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, G. Panico, A. Pomarol, O. Pujolàs and G. Servant, “Cosmological Higgs-Axion Interplay for a Naturally Small Electroweak Scale,” arXiv:1506.09217 [hep-ph].
  • (25) E. Hardy, “Electroweak relaxation from finite temperature,” arXiv:1507.07525 [hep-ph].
  • (26) Y. Bai and P. Schwaller, “Scale of dark QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 6, 063522 [arXiv:1306.4676 [hep-ph]].
  • (27) J. E. Juknevich, “Pure-glue hidden valleys through the Higgs portal,” JHEP 1008 (2010) 121 [arXiv:0911.5616 [hep-ph]].
  • (28) N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum, “Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC,” JHEP 1507 (2015) 105 [arXiv:1501.05310 [hep-ph]].
  • (29) D. Curtin and C. B. Verhaaren, “Discovering Uncolored Naturalness in Exotic Higgs Decays,” arXiv:1506.06141 [hep-ph].
  • (30) P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski and A. Weiler, “Emerging Jets,” JHEP 1505 (2015) 059 [arXiv:1502.05409 [hep-ph]].
  • (31) M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek, “Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders,” Phys. Lett. B 651 (2007) 374 [hep-ph/0604261].
  • (32) J. Garcia-Bellido, D. Y. Grigoriev, A. Kusenko and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 123504 [hep-ph/9902449].
  • (33) L. M. Krauss and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1502 [hep-ph/9902420].
  • (34) A. Tranberg and J. Smit, JHEP 0311 (2003) 016 [hep-ph/0310342].
  • (35) G. Servant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 17, 171803 [arXiv:1407.0030 [hep-ph]].
  • (36) A. Kehagias, T. Riotto private communication
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description