Relativistic stars with purely toroidal magnetic fields
Abstract
We investigate the effects of the purely toroidal magnetic field on the equilibrium structures of the relativistic stars. The master equations for obtaining equilibrium solutions of relativistic rotating stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields are derived for the first time. To solve these master equations numerically, we extend the CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme for calculating relativistic rotating stars containing no magnetic field to incorporate the effects of the purely toroidal magnetic fields. By using the numerical scheme, we then calculate a large number of the equilibrium configurations for a particular distribution of the magnetic field in order to explore the equilibrium properties. We also construct the equilibrium sequences of the constant baryon mass and/or the constant magnetic flux, which model the evolution of an isolated neutron star as it loses angular momentum via the gravitational waves. Important properties of the equilibrium configurations of the magnetized stars obtained in this study are summarized as follows ; (1) For the nonrotating stars, the matter distribution of the stars is prolately distorted due to the toroidal magnetic fields. (2) For the rapidly rotating stars, the shape of the stellar surface becomes oblate because of the centrifugal force. But, the matter distribution deep inside the star is sufficiently prolate for the mean matter distribution of the star to be prolate. (3) The stronger toroidal magnetic fields lead to the massshedding of the stars at the lower angular velocity. (4) For some equilibrium sequences of the constant baryon mass and magnetic flux, the stars can spin up as they lose angular momentum.
pacs:
I Introduction
There is growing evidence for the existence of socalled magnetars, supermagnetized neutron stars with the magnetic fields of G (e.g., Lattimer:2006 ; wod ). Although such stars are estimated to be only a subclass () of the canonical neutron stars with G kouve , much attention has been paid to the objects because they pose many astrophysically exciting but unresolved problems. Giant flaring activities in the soft gamma repeaters observed for the last two decades have given us good opportunities to study the coupling of the interior to the magnetospheric structures of magnetars Thompson:1995gw ; Thompson:1996pe , but the relationship between the crustal fraction and the subsequent star quarks has not yet been clarified (see references in anna ; Geppert:2006cp ). The origin of the large magnetic field is also a big problem, whether generated at postcollapse in the rapidly rotating neutron star Thompson:1993hn or descended from the main sequence stars Ferrario:2007bt . Assuming large magnetic fields before corecollapse, researches have recently performed extensive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stellar collapse simulations Yamada:2004 ; Kotake:2004 ; Moissenko:2006 ; Obergaulinger:2006 ; Shibata:2006hr ; Livne:2007 in order to understand the formation mechanism of magnetars, with different levels of sophistication in the treatment of equations of state (EOSs), the neutrino transport, and general relativity (see Kotake:2006 for a review). Here it is worth mentioning that the gravitational waves from magnetars could be a useful source of information about magnetar interiors Bonazzola:1995rb ; Cutler:2002nw . From a microscopic point of view, the effects of magnetic field larger than the socalled QED limit of , on the EOSs (e.g., Lattimer:2006 ) and the radiation processes have been also extensively investigated (see Harding:2006 for a review). For the understanding of the formation and evolution of the magnetars, it is indispensable to unify these macroscopic and microscopic studies, albeit not an easy job.
When one tries to study the above interesting issues, the construction of an equilibrium configuration of magnetars may be one of the most fundamental problems. In spite of the many magnetized star investigations that have so far been carried out, with different levels of sophistication in the treatment of the magnetic field structure, equations of state (EOSs), and the general relativity Bocquet:1995 ; Ioka:2003 ; Ioka:2004 ; Kiuchi:2007pa ; Konno:1999zv ; Tomimura:2005 ; Yoshida:2006a ; Yoshida:2006b , there still remains room for more sophistication in the previous studies in which stellar structures are obtained within the framework of Newtonian dynamics. Since we are interested in magnetar structures, the general relativistic treatment due to the strong gravity of magnetars is required in constructions of a magnetar model. However, a fully general relativistic means constructing a stellar model with arbitrarily magnetic structure are still not available. In most studies on the structures of relativistic magnetized stars, weak magnetic fields and/or purely poloidal magnetic fields have been assumed. Bocquet et al. Bocquet:1995 and Cardall et al. Cardall:2001 have treated relativistic stellar models containing purely poloidal magnetic fields. Konno et al. Konno:1999zv have analyzed similar models using a perturbative approach. Ioka and Sasaki have investigated structures of mixed poloidaltoroidal magnetic fields around a spherical star by using a perturbative technique Ioka:2004 .
As shown in corecollapse supernova MHD simulations (see, e.g., Kotake:2006 ), the toroidal magnetic fields can be easily amplified because of the winding up of the initial seed poloidal fields as long as the core is rotating differentially. After core bounce, as a result, the toroidal fields dominate over the poloidal ones in some protoneutron star models even if there is no toroidal field initially. This winding up amplification of the toroidal magnetic fields therefore indicates that some neutron stars could have toroidal fields much higher than poloidal ones. As mentioned before, however, no effect of a strong toroidal magnetic field has been taken into account in relativistic magnetized stellar models. In order to elucidate the effects of strong toroidal magnetic fields on neutron star structures, in this paper, we concentrate on magnetic effects due to purely toroidal fields on structures of relativistic stars as a first step. Within the framework of the Newtonian dynamics, Miketinac has obtained highly magnetized stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields Miketinac:1973 . In this study, we extend Miketinac’s models so as to include the effects of general relativity and rotation.
First of all, we derive master equations for obtaining relativistic rotating stellar models having purely toroidal magnetic fields. The master equations obtained are converted into integral expressions and solved numerically with a selfconsistent field scheme similar to the KomatsuEriguchiHachisu scheme for equilibrium structures of relativistic rotating stars Komatsu:1989 . Using the numerical scheme written in the present study, we construct a large number of equilibrium stars for a wide range of parameters. As shown by Trehan & Uberoi trehan1972 , the toroidal magnetic field tends to distort a stellar shape prolately. This is because the toroidal magnetic field lines behave like a rubber belt, pulling in the matter around the magnetic axis. Such a prolateshaped neutron star may be an optimal source of gravitational waves if the star rotates Cutler:2002nw . In this gravitational wave emission mechanism, one important parameter is degree of prolateness, which determines the amount of gravitational radiation. Thus, we pay attention to the deformation of the star. We also construct sequences of the equilibrium stars along which the total baryon rest mass and/or the magnetic flux with respect to the meridional crosssection keep constant. These equilibrium sequences are available for exploring evolutionary sequences because the total baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux are well conserved in quasisteady evolution of isolated neutron stars.
This paper is organized as follows. The master equations for obtaining equilibrium configurations of rotating stars with purely toroidal magnetic fields are derived in Sec. II. The numerical scheme for computing the stellar models is briefly described in Sec. III. Sec. IV is devoted to showing numerical results. Summary and discussion follow in Sec. V. In this paper, we use geometrical units with .
Ii Master equations
ii.1 Matter equations
The rotating relativistic stars containing purely toroidal magnetic fields are considered in this paper. Assumptions to obtain the equilibrium models are summarized as follows ; (1) Equilibrium models are stationary and axisymmetric, i.e. the spacetime has the time Killing vector, , and the rotational Killing vector, , and Lie derivatives of the physical quantities of the equilibrium models with respect to these Killing vectors vanish. (2) The matter source is approximated by a perfect fluid with infinite conductivity. (3) There is no meridional flow of the matter. (4) The equation of state for the matter is barotropic. By virtue of assumption (3), the matter fourvelocity is reduced to
(1) 
where is the angular velocity of the matter. We further assume that the magnetic field of the star has toroidal parts only, so that the Faraday tensor, , obeys the conditions, given by
(2) 
Note that since Eq. (2) includes five independent conditions, we see that the Faraday tensor has one independent component only. Thanks to the conditions assumed above, one of the Maxwell equations and the perfectconductivity condition,
(3)  
(4) 
are automatically satisfied, and we need not consider them any further. The stressenergy tensor of the perfectly conductive fluid is given by
(5) 
where is the rest energy density, the specific internal energy, the pressure, and the inverse of the metric . Here, we have defined the magnetic field measured by the observer with the fluid fourvelocity as
(6) 
where stands for the contravariant LeviCivita tensor with . Here denotes the determinant of the metric. By using Eqs. (1)–(2), (4)–(5), and (6), we can prove that the circularity condition, i.e., , is satisfied in the present situation Wald:1984 . Note that a similar argument about the circularity has been given by Oron Oron: 2002 . Therefore, there exists a family of twosurfaces everywhere orthogonal to the plane defined by the two Killing vectors and Carter:1969 , and the metric can be written, following Komatsu:1989 ; Cook:1992 , in the form
(7) 
where the metric potentials, , , , and , are functions of and only. We see that the nonzero component of in this coordinate is . It is convenient to define the determinants of two twodimensional subspaces for later discussion,
(8) 
where the determinant of the metric (7) is related to the two determinants as . We then find a convenient relation,
(9) 
Because of this relation, the fourcurrent can, in terms of , be written in the form,
(10)  
The relativistic Euler equation,
(11) 
is reduced to
(12) 
where is the specific enthalpy and we have assumed the uniform rotation, i.e., . Note that although the extension to the case of the differential rotation is straightforward, we take the uniform rotation law for the sake of simplicity. Integrability of Eq. (12) requires
(13) 
where is an arbitrary function of . Integrating Eq. (12), we arrive at the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium,
(14) 
where is an integral constant. The nontrivial components of the magnetic field are explicitly given by
(15)  
(16) 
in which we confirm that our definition of the toroidal magnetic field (2) reasonably agrees with the Newtonian definition of the toroidal field.
ii.2 Einstein equations
Following Komatsu:1989 ; Cook:1992 , we may write the general relativistic field equations determining , , and as
(22)  
(23)  
(24) 
where is the Laplacian of flat 3space, and . Here, , , and are given by
(25)  
(26)  
(27) 
where denotes the magnitude of the magnetic field, given by
(28) 
Since , , and do not include the secondorder derivative of the metric potentials, the three equations (22)–(24) are all elliptictype partial differential equations. We can solve these equations iteratively with appropriate boundary conditions by using a selfconsistent field method Komatsu:1989 .
The fourth field equation determining is given by
(29) 
We can solve Eq. (29) by integrating it from the pole to the equator with an initial condition, given by
(30) 
ii.3 Equation of state and function
In this study, we adapt a polytropic equation of state
(31) 
where and are the polytropic index and constant, respectively. Because all the variables can be normalized by the factor , whose unit is of length, we define the following dimensionless quantities,
For the arbitrary function defined in (13), we take the following simple form,
(32) 
where and are constants. Then, and are reduced into
(33) 
(34) 
Regularity of on the magnetic axis requires that . As shown in equation (33), the magnetic fields vanish at the surface of the star when , which we require from the regularity of as mentioned above. Therefore, we need not pay attention to the boundary condition at the stellar surface for the magnetic field when .
Iii Numerical Method
iii.1 CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme
As shown in the last section, our master equations are quite similar to those for rotating relativistic stars in the sense that the type and rank of the differential equations are the same. The difference is the emergence of the new function , which can be treated in the same way as that of for differentially rotating stars. In order to solve our master equations, therefore, we can straightforwardly adapt a numerical method for computing rotating relativistic stellar models. In this study, we extend the CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme Cook:1992 to incorporate the effects of purely toroidal magnetic fields. The CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme is a variant of the KomatsuEriguchiHachisu scheme Komatsu:1989 , which is a general relativistic version of the Hachisu SelfConsistent Field scheme for computing Newtonian equilibrium models of rotating stars Hachisu:1986 . In the CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme, a new radial coordinate , defined as
(35) 
where is the dimensionless radius of the surface at the equator and this transformation maps radial infinity to the finite coordinate locations , is introduced so as to include all the information of spacetime on the hypersurface of constant. Since our numerical scheme is quite similar to the CookShapiroTeukolsky scheme, the details are omitted here.
iii.2 Global physical quantities
After obtaining solutions, it is useful to compute global physical quantities characterizing the equilibrium configurations to clearly understand the properties of the sequences of the equilibrium models. In this paper, we compute the following quantities: the gravitational mass , the baryon rest mass , the proper mass , the total angular momentum , the total rotational energy , the total magnetic energy , the quadrupole momentum , , and the magnetic flux , defined as
(36)  
(37)  
(38)  
(39)  
(40)  
(41)  
(42)  
(43)  
(44) 
The definition of the magnetic energy and flux are given in appendix A. The gravitational energy and the mean deformation rate are, respectively, defined as
(45)  
(46) 
iii.3 Virial identities
Bonazzola and Gourgoulhon have derived two different kinds of virial identities for relativistic equilibrium configurations Gourgoulhon:1994 ; Bonazzola:1994 . These virial identities provide us means to estimate error involved in the numerical solutions of the equilibrium configurations. Let us define two quantities and , given by
(47)  
(48) 
where is the abbreviation of
(49) 
Then we may define two error indicators, given by
(50)  
(51) 
which vanish if the virial identities are strictly satisfied. In all the numerical computations shown in the next section, GRV2 and GRV3 are monitored to check accuracy of the numerical solutions. A typical value of GRV2 and GRV3 is , showing that the numerical solutions obtained in the present study have acceptable accuracy. The explicit values of GRV2 and GRV3 are not shown here.
Iv Numerical Results
To compute specific models of the magnetized stars, we need specify the function forms of the EOS and the function , which determines the distribution of the magnetic fields. The polytrope index is taken to be unity in this study because the polytropic EOS reproduces a canonical model of the neutron star. As in Ref. Shibata:2005ss , the polytropic constant in cgs units is set to be
(52) 
with which the maximum mass model of the spherical star is characterized by and km, where denotes the circumferential radius of the star at the equator (see Table 1). As for the function , we chose two different values of , and , to investigate how the equilibrium properties depend on the shape of the impressed magnetic fields. From equation (33), it can be seen that the concentration of around its maximum value becomes deeper as the value of increases.
In the numerical scheme in this study, the central density and the strength of the magnetic field parameter (see Eq. (32)) have to be given to compute the nonrotating models, i.e., the models. For the rotating models, one need specify the axis ratio in addition to and , where and are the polar and equatorial radii, respectively. To explore properties of the relativistic magnetized star models, we construct a large number of the specific models; for the nonrotating cases, models in the parameter space of , and for the rotating cases, models in the parameter space of .
Before describing the numerical results in detail, let us survey the solution space for the equilibrium models of the rotating magnetized stars, shown in Fig. 1. In this figure, the , , and axis are the central density , the magnetic field strength , and the axis ratio , respectively. All these quantities are shown in units of , as mentioned before. A point inside the cubic region drawn by the solid lines corresponds to a physically acceptable solution computed in this study. Because we are interested in magnetized neutron stars, equilibrium solutions between the two sides of the cube that are given as constant surfaces are considered. The other four sides of the cube represent the boundaries beyond which there is no physically acceptable solution. The surface corresponds to the nonmagnetized limit, the upper surface of nearly constant to the nonrotating limit, and the lower surface of nearly constant to the massshedding limit (MS limit). Here, the massshedding limit means the boundary beyond which no equilibrium solution exists because of too strong centrifugal forces, due to which the matter is shedding from the equatorial surface of the star. The sixth surface of the cube corresponds to the nonconvergence limit beyond which any solution cannot converge with the present numerical scheme. In other words, for values of larger than some critical value, we fail to obtain a converged solution by using our method of solution. The reason of this fail is unclear.
As mentioned before, the constant baryon mass and/or the constant magnetic flux sequences of equilibrium stars are important for studying quasistationary evolution of the isolated neutron star. In Fig. 1, a set of equilibrium solutions having the same total baryon rest mass construct the surface embedded in the cube that is drawn with the dashed line boundary. On this constant baryon rest mass surface, the three dotted curves represent the constant magnetic flux sequences of equilibrium stars.

iv.1 Nonrotating models
First let us consider the static configurations for the following two reasons. (1) Since the magnetars and the high field neutron stars observed so far are all slow rotators, the static models could well approximate to such stars. (2) In the static models, one can see purely magnetic effects on the equilibrium properties because there is no centrifugal force and all the stellar deformation is attributed to the magnetic stress. In Fig. 2, we show distributions of the rest mass density and the magnetic field in the meridional planes for the two static equilibrium stars characterized by (1) , , , , , , and , [Panels (a) and (c)] and by (2) , , , , , , and [Panels (b) and (d)]. These two models have the same maximum magnetic field strength of . In Fig. 2, as mentioned, we can confirm that the magnetic stress due to the purely toroidal field makes the stellar shape prolate. This is a great contrast to the magnetic stress due to the purely poloidal field, for which the shape of the star deforms oblately as shown in Ref. (Chandra:1953, ). As for the dependence of on the stellar structures, it is found that the density distributions of the stars with are prolately more concentrated around the magnetic axis than those of the stars with , as can be seen in Fig. 2. This feature is due to the magnetic pressure distributions. As mentioned in the Introduction, the toroidal magnetic field lines behave like a rubber belt that is wrapped around the waist of the stars. For the case, this tightening due to the toroidal fields is effective even near the surface of the star. To see it clearly, in Fig. 3, we give the ratio of the magnetic pressure to the matter pressure as functions of for the two models shown in Fig. 2. In this figure, we see that for the case, the magnetic pressure dominates over the matter pressure near the stellar surface, while for the case, the matter pressure dominates over the magnetic pressure there.
In Fig. 4, we show the gravitational mass of static models for several equilibrium sequences of constant and of constant as functions of the central density . Here, means the flux normalized by units of Weber, which is a typical value of the magnetic flux for a canonical neutron star model. In this figure, the curves labeled by their values of () indicate the equilibrium sequence along which the values of () are held constant. The filled circles in Fig. 4 indicate the maximum mass models of the equilibrium sequences of constant . The global physical quantities of these maximum mass models, the magnetic flux , the central baryon mass density , the gravitational mass , the baryon rest mass , the circumferential radius at the equator , the maximum strength of the magnetic fields , the ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy , and the mean deformation rate are summarized in Table 1. Form this table, we see that the strong toroidal magnetic fields of G make, roughly increase in the maximum gravitational mass of the stars and the highly prolate stellar deformation of , even though the magnetic field of G might be too strong even for a magnetar model. The properties of the constant sequences will be discussed in detail later.








k=1  

0.000E+00  1.797E+00  1.719E+00  1.888E+00  1.180E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00 
1.616E+00  2.032E+00  1.843E+00  2.014E+00  1.457E+01  1.008E+00  1.253E01  4.284E01 
2.155E+00  2.026E+00  1.935E+00  2.107E+00  1.667E+01  1.129E+00  1.737E01  6.933E01 
2.694E+00  1.914E+00  2.041E+00  2.210E+00  1.951E+01  1.168E+00  2.186E01  1.012E+00 
k=2  
0.000E+00  1.797E+00  1.719E+00  1.888E+00  1.180E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00 
1.077E+00  2.032E+00  1.855E+00  2.055E+00  1.361E+01  8.023E01  8.068E02  3.874E01 
1.347E+00  2.039E+00  1.920E+00  2.128E+00  1.444E+01  8.630E01  1.024E01  5.315E01 
1.616E+00  2.126E+00  1.990E+00  2.210E+00  1.516E+01  9.205E01  1.198E01  6.721E01 
iv.2 Rotating models
Next, let us move on to the rotation models. For the static stars with the purely toroidal magnetic field, as shown in the last subsection, the ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy can be of an order of , which is larger than a typical value of the ratio of the rotation energy to the gravitational energy for the rotating nonmagnetized neutron star models. As shown in Komatsu:1989 , a typical value of for the uniformly rotating polytropic neutron star models having no magnetic field is of an order of . This fact implies that a large amount of the magnetic energy can be stored in the neutron star with infinite conductivity because the massshedding like limit does not appear for the magnetic force unlike the centrifugal force of the rotating star cases as argued in Cardall:2001 . In this paper, as mentioned, we are concerned with equilibrium properties of the strongly magnetized stars. Thus, most stellar models treated here are magneticfielddominated ones in the sense that is larger than even for the massshedding models. In such models, the effects of the rotation on the stellar structures are necessarily supplementary and the basic properties do not highly depend on the rotation parameter.
In Fig. 5, we display the typical distributions of the rest mass density and the magnetic field for the two rotating equilibrium stars characterized by (1) , , , , , , , and , [Panels (a) and (c)] and by (2) , , , , , , , and [Panels (b) and (d)]. These models have the same maximum magnetic field strength of . Comparing Fig. 5 with Fig. 2, we see that basic properties of the structures of the rotating models are similar to those of the static models. Difference between them only appears near the equatorial surface of the stars. As shown in Fig. 5, the density distributions are stretched from the rotation axis outward due to the centrifugal force and the shape of the stellar surface becomes oblate, which can be seen from the values of the axis ratio . On the other hand, the equidensity contours deep inside the stars are oblate, which can be confirmed from the values of the mean deformation rate . This is because the centrifugal force is the most significant agent deforming the stars near the equatorial surface of the star since, as shown in equation (33), the anisotropic magnetic stress of the present models vanishes at the surface of the star.




iv.3 Constant baryon mass sequence
In this subsection, we concentrate on the constant baryon mass sequences of the magnetized stars. In the static star cases, this condition of the constant baryon mass picks out a single sequence of the equilibrium stars. Along such an equilibrium sequence, as mentioned, the magnetic flux of the stars cannot be held constant. For the rotating star cases, on the other hand, we can select a single sequence of the equilibrium stars by keeping the baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux constant simultaneously. The equilibrium sequences along which the baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux are conserved may model the isolated neutron stars that are adiabatically losing angular momentum via the gravitational radiation. It should be noted that here, we have omitted evolution of the function , which will change its function form during such a process of losing angular momentum even though there has been no way to determine it so far. Thus, the constant baryon mass sequences considered in this study might be oversimplified for investigations of the adiabatic evolution of the isolated neutron stars. However, the inclusion of the evolution effects of the function is beyond the scope of the present study.
First we consider the constant baryon mass sequences of the nonrotating stars to clearly understand the basic properties of the simplest equilibrium sequences. Then we move on to the rotating cases. As done in Ref. Cook:1992 , we divide the equilibrium sequences of the magnetized stars into two classes, normal and supramassive equilibrium sequences. In this study, the normal (supramassive) equilibrium sequence is defined as an equilibrium sequence whose baryon rest mass is smaller (larger) than the maximum baryon rest mass of the nonmagnetized and nonrotating stars. As shown in Fig. 4, the maximum baryon rest mass of the nonrotating and nonmagnetized stars for the present EOS is given by . Therefore, the normal (supramassive) equilibrium sequences are simply defined as equilibrium sequences with ().
iv.3.1 Static cases
In Fig. 4, one can see how the constant baryon mass sequences of the nonrotating stars are drawn on the – plane. In this figure, the two constant baryon mass sequences characterized by and refer to the normal equilibrium sequences, while the three constant baryon mass sequences characterized by , , and refer to the supramassive equilibrium sequences. In Fig. 4, one can confirm that the two normal equilibrium sequences of and indeed end at the equilibrium stars having (no magnetic field) and that the supramassive equilibrium sequences never intersect with the curves given by . Note that all the end points of the equilibrium sequences of the nonrotating magnetized stars correspond to the “NC limit” in Fig. 1.
In Figs. 6 and 7, the global physical quantities, , , , and are given as functions of the maximum values of inside the star, , for the normal equilibrium sequences with and for the supramassive equilibrium sequences with , respectively. In these figures,
(53) 
where stands for a physical quantity for the constant baryon mass sequences of the nonrotating stars. Numerical values of the global physical quantities, the magnetic flux , the central rest mass density , the gravitational mass , the circumferential radius , the maximum strength of the magnetic field , the ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy , and the mean deformation rate , for the selected models, which are displayed in Figs. 6 and 7, are also summarized in Tables 2 and 3. From Figs. 6 and 7, we see that, qualitatively, basic behavior of , , , does not highly depend on the value of . Comparing Fig. 6 with Fig. 7, we find that as the value of is varied, the global changes in the global physical quantities for the normal sequences are of opposite directions to those for the supramassive equilibrium sequences.
Before going to the the rotating cases, in which we consider the equilibrium sequences along which the baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux are held constants, it is useful to investigate nonrotating solutions referred to these equilibrium sequences of the constant baryon rest mass and magnetic flux. Plots given in Fig. 4 tell us the number of such solutions. If the values of the baryon rest mass and magnetic flux are specified, one can pick out two curves corresponding to the constant baryon rest mass and the constant magnetic flux. Then, the intersections of these two curves indicate the members of the constant baryon rest mass and magnetic flux sequences in the nonrotating limit. For the solutions of the normal equilibrium sequences, characterized by , it can be seen that there is a single intersection of the two curves. (Note that we only consider the solutions in the lower central density region, even though there are other solutions in the higher central density region.) For example, in the left panel of Fig. 4, the curve intersects once to the curve. For the solutions of the supramassive equilibrium sequences, characterized by , on the other hand, we see that there are the following three possibilities. (1) There is no intersection between the two curves, showing that the nonrotating limit does not exist. (2) There is a single intersection between the two curves, which is only possible when one curve is tangent to the other. In this case, a unique limit of no rotation exists. (3) There are two intersections between the two curves, showing that there are two different limits of no rotation in this case. For example, in the left panel of Fig. 4, let us consider the constant baryon rest mass sequence of . If we chose to be , , and , then the numbers of the intersection of the two curves are, respectively, two, one, and zero, as can be seen from Fig. 4. Thus, it is found that the supramassive equilibrium sequences with , , and have no nonrotation limit, the single nonrotating limit, and double nonrotation limits, respectively. One important consequence of this fact is that there are two disconnected branches of the equilibrium sequences characterized by the same baryon rest mass and the magnetic flux for some supramassive equilibrium sequences, as discussed in the next subsection.
0.000E+00  8.569E01  1.551E+00  1.430E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00 
1.171E+00  8.538E01  1.576E+00  1.786E+01  5.222E01  1.307E01  4.975E01 
1.754E+00  7.371E01  1.600E+00  2.340E+01  5.458E01  2.225E01  1.151E+00 
2.120E+00  6.400E01  1.614E+00  2.885E+01  5.111E01  2.772E01  1.758E+00 
0.000E+00  8.569E01  1.551E+00  1.430E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00 
7.239E01  8.178E01  1.566E+00  1.611E+01  4.761E01  8.635E02  3.372E01 
9.424E01  7.677E01  1.575E+00  1.735E+01  5.089E01  1.232E01  5.391E01 
1.074E+00  7.335E01  1.580E+00  1.825E+01  5.170E01  1.454E01  6.831E01 




2.178E+00  1.779E+00  1.936E+00  1.765E+01  1.048E+00  1.842E01  7.650E01 
2.430E+00  1.415E+00  1.958E+00  2.083E+01  9.368E01  2.230E01  1.064E+00 
2.650E+00  1.222E+00  1.974E+00  2.374E+01  8.659E01  2.532E01  1.351E+00 
2.838E+00  1.092E+00  1.987E+00  2.651E+01  8.102E01  2.778E01  1.626E+00 
1.250E+00  1.980E+00  1.896E+00  1.424E+01  8.360E01  9.620E02  4.833E01 
1.365E+00  1.625E+00  1.909E+00  1.542E+01  8.044E01  1.162E01  5.874E01 
1.460E+00  1.468E+00  1.918E+00  1.622E+01  7.897E01  1.307E01  6.753E01 
1.538E+00  1.371E+00  1.925E+00  1.685E+01  7.793E01  1.421E01  7.510E01 




iv.3.2 Rotating cases
First, let us consider the normal equilibrium sequences of the magnetized rotating stars. In Figs. 8 and 9, we show the global physical quantities , , , , , and as functions of for the constant baryon mass and magnetic flux equilibrium sequences with and , respectively. All the equilibrium sequences given in these figures are of the normal equilibrium sequences characterized by the constant baryon rest mass given by . In Figs. 8 and 9, each curve is labeled by its value of which is held constant along the equilibrium sequence. For the sake of comparison, the physical quantities for the nonmagnetized equilibrium sequences () are also given in Figs. 8 and 9. Note that the constant baryon rest mass equilibrium sequences of the nonmagnetized polytropic stars have been argued in detail in Ref. Cook:1992 . Numerical values of the global physical quantities, the central rest mass density , the gravitational mass , the circumferential radius , the angular velocity , the angular momentum , the ratio of the rotation energy to the gravitational energy , the ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy , the mean deformation rate , and the maximum strength of the magnetic field , for some selected models are tabulated in Tables 4 and 5 for the cases of and , respectively.
In Figs. 8 and 9, as discussed, we see that all the normal equilibrium sequences begin at the nonrotating equilibrium stars and continue to the massshedding limits, at which the sequences end, as the angular velocity increases. (In Figs. 8 and 9, the asterisks indicate the massshedding models.) It is also found from these figures that the behavior of the normal equilibrium sequences as functions of are basically independent of the values of and . As the angular velocity is increased, the gravitational masses and the circumferential radii increase, while the central densities and the maximum strength of the magnetic fields decrease because of the baryon rest mass constancy and of the magnetic flux constancy, respectively. The angular momenta are monotonically increasing functions of the angular velocity, which implies that the angular momentum loss via gravitational radiation results in the spin down of the star for the normal equilibrium sequences.
5.745E01  1.666E+00  2.235E+01  4.571E+00  1.905E+00  9.657E02  0.000E+00  2.636E01  0.000E+00 
6.286E01  1.661E+00  1.925E+01  4.552E+00  1.707E+00  8.224E02  0.000E+00  2.310E01  0.000E+00 
7.864E01  1.650E+00  1.616E+01  4.008E+00  1.179E+00  4.497E02  0.000E+00  1.368E01  0.000E+00 
8.987E01  1.644E+00  1.490E+01  3.230E+00  8.355E01  2.444E02  0.000E+00  7.764E02  0.000E+00 
1.073E+00  1.637E+00  1.356E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  1.928E04  0.000E+00 
8.261E01  1.674E+00  2.542E+01  3.627E+00  1.131E+00  4.242E02  1.194E01  1.697E01  4.957E+00 
8.739E01  1.670E+00  2.065E+01  3.386E+00  9.709E01  3.279E02  1.180E01  2.053E01  5.162E+00 
9.017E01  1.668E+00  1.952E+01  3.154E+00  8.631E01  2.663E02  1.170E01  2.395E01  5.275E+00 
9.913E01  1.663E+00  1.732E+01  2.035E+00  4.937E01  9.463E03  1.133E01  3.339E01  5.621E+00 
1.044E+00  1.660E+00  1.642E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  1.111E01  3.883E01  5.809E+00 
7.947E01  1.692E+00  3.202E+01  2.554E+00  8.514E01  2.516E02  2.001E01  6.485E01  5.671E+00 
8.314E01  1.689E+00  2.482E+01  2.227E+00  6.776E01  1.690E02  1.988E01  7.263E01  5.871E+00 
8.504E01  1.687E+00  2.340E+01  1.957E+00  5.703E01  1.230E02  1.979E01  7.791E01  5.977E+00 
8.782E01  1.686E+00  2.200E+01  1.453E+00  4.019E01  6.310E03  1.973E01  8.298E01  6.125E+00 
9.035E01  1.684E+00  2.084E+01  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  0.000E+00  1.959E01  9.042E01  6.258E+00 






6.943E01  1.668E+00  2.327E+01  4.191E+00  1.511E+00  6.772E02  6.524E02  6.091E02  3.842E+00 
7.115E01  1.667E+00  2.133E+01  4.185E+00  1.464E+00  6.459E02  6.483E02  6.430E02  3.898E+00 
8.137E01  1.658E+00  1.769E+01  3.742E+00  1.083E+00 