Relativistic Iron Line Emission from 4U 1636-536

Relativistic Iron Line Emission from the Neutron Star Low-mass X-Ray Binary 4U 1636-536

Dirk Pandel and Philip Kaaret Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 Stephane Corbel Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot and Service d’Astrophysique, UMR AIM, CEA Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
Abstract

We present an analysis of XMM-Newton and RXTE data from three observations of the neutron star LMXB 4U 1636-536. The X-ray spectra show clear evidence of a broad, asymmetric iron emission line extending over the energy range 4–9 keV. The line profile is consistent with relativistically broadened Fe K emission from the inner accretion disk. The Fe K line in 4U 1636-536 is considerably broader than the asymmetric iron lines recently found in other neutron star LMXBs, which indicates a high disk inclination. We find evidence that the broad iron line feature is a combination of several K lines from iron in different ionization states.

Subject headings:
accretion, accretion disks — binaries: close — stars: individual (4U 1636-536) — stars: neutron — X-rays: binaries — X-rays: stars
journal: Published in the Astrophysical Journal

1. Introduction

Relativistically broadened, asymmetric Fe K lines from the inner accretion disk have been observed in many supermassive and stellar-mass black holes (e.g. Fabian, 2006). In neutron star binaries, however, the iron lines are weaker, and until recently observations did not clearly reveal a relativistic line profile. Bhattacharyya & Strohmayer (2007) found an asymmetric Fe K line in XMM-Newton spectra of the low-mass X-ray binary (LMXB) Serpens X-1 and showed that the line profile is consistent with fluorescent iron line emission from the inner accretion disk. Similar asymmetric Fe K lines were found by Cackett et al. (2008) in Suzaku spectra of the neutron star LMXBs Serpens X-1, 4U 1820-30, and GX 349+2. In this paper we present XMM-Newton and RXTE observations of the neutron star LMXB 4U 1636-536. We analyze the X-ray spectra to determine the profile of the relativistic Fe K line and constrain the properties of the inner accretion disk.

4U 1636-536 (V801 Ara) is a well-studied, bursting LMXB consisting of a neutron star in a 3.8 hr orbit with a 0.4 solar mass, 18th magnitude star (van Paradijs et al., 1990) and is located at a distance of 6 kpc (Galloway et al., 2006). The X-ray timing properties of the binary have been studied extensively. Zhang et al. (1996) and Wijnands et al. (1997) discovered quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) at kHz frequencies. The source also exhibits highly coherent burst oscillations at 581 Hz which are likely related to the rotation of the neutron star (Zhang et al., 1997; Strohmayer & Markwardt, 2002). Kaaret et al. (1999) found that the soft X-ray emission, modulated at the kHz QPO frequency, lags behind the hard X-ray emission. A possible explanation for this phase lag is the reprocessing of hard X-rays in a cooler Comptonizing corona with a size of at most a few kilometers. Barret et al. (2007) interpreted observations showing a decline of the QPO coherence and rms amplitude at high QPO frequencies as evidence that the inner radius of the accretion disk in 4U 1636-536 is usually larger than but sometimes approaches the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). However, Méndez (2006) argued that this decline is not caused by effects related to the ISCO.

In this paper we report on three X-ray observations of 4U 1636-536 that were carried out simultaneously with XMM-Newton and RXTE. We present an analysis of the X-ray spectrum over the 0.5–100 keV energy range and our results from modeling the continuum and relativistic Fe K line emission. We use the Fe K line profile to derive constraints on the disk inclination and inner disk radius. We show that the line profile is not consistent with a single relativistic Fe K line from a neutron star accretion disk and that at least two lines from different ionization states of iron are needed to adequately describe the line profile. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for measurements of neutron star radii based on Fe K line profiles.

2. Observations

4U 1636-536 was observed with XMM-Newton (Jansen et al., 2001) on 2005 August 29 (observation ID 0303250201), on 2007 September 28 (observation ID 0500350301), and on 2008 February 27 (observation ID 0500350401). The EPIC PN camera (Strüder et al., 2001) collected 30.0 ks of data starting at 18:24 UT during the 2005 observation (hereafter observation 1), 30.6 ks of data starting at 15:45 UT during the 2007 observation (observation 2), and 38.6 ks of data starting at 04:16 UT during the 2008 observation (observation 3). The EPIC PN was operated in timing mode and with the medium blocking filter. We processed the PN data from observations 1 and 2 with the XMM-Newton SAS version 7.1.0 using the latest calibration files. The data from observation 3 required special processing by the XMM-Newton Science Operations Center because of the very large number of events. We extracted source photons from the timing mode data using CCD rows RAWX = 30–46 (29–45 for observation 3) and background photons using RAWX = 2–18. The full range of CCD columns RAWY was used. We selected only events with PATTERN  4 (singles and doubles) and FLAG = 0 and restricted our analysis to the energy range 0.5–12 keV. The average PN source count rate in this energy range, excluding X-ray bursts, was 230 s for observation 1, 470 s for observation 2, and 620 s for observation 3. These rates are below the 800 s timing mode pile-up limit above which the spectral response would be deteriorated by photon pile-up (XMM-Newton User’s Handbook). The background count rate was less than 2% of the source count rate and did not exhibit significant flaring. We find a strong line-like feature in the background spectrum near 0.45 keV. We interpret this feature as the electronic noise peak for double events that is also present for PN imaging modes but is shifted to higher energies in timing mode.

4U 1636-536 was observed with RXTE (Bradt et al., 1993) simultaneously with each XMM-Newton observation. The RXTE observations were somewhat longer than the XMM-Newton observations and completely overlapped with the EPIC PN exposures. No Earth occultation occurred during these observations and the target was observed continuously with RXTE. In this paper we consider only the data obtained with the HEXTE detector (Rothschild et al., 1998). We did not use the PCA data because of their lower energy resolution compared to the EPIC PN data and because the PCA spectrum in the 3–12 keV energy range showed an up to 30% higher flux than the EPIC PN spectrum. Similar excesses of the PCA flux compared to other instruments have previously been reported (e.g. Tomsick et al., 1999; Courvoisier et al., 2003). It was not possible to correct for the higher PCA flux by including a multiplicative cross-calibration factor because the flux excess is strongly energy dependent (30% at 3 keV and 10%–15% at 10 keV). We included in our analysis only those HEXTE data that were taken simultaneously to the EPIC PN data. The HEXTE data cover the entire duration of the EPIC PN exposures with the exception of a single 1 ks data gap in each observation. The HEXTE background rate and the telescope pointing were stable during both observations. We extracted HEXTE data for the energy range 20–100 keV using the REX data analysis script. For observation 1, we included in our analysis data from both HEXTE clusters. For observations 2 and 3, we only used the data from cluster B because cluster A was no longer able to obtain background measurements.

3. Spectral Analysis

Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3
Spectral Model (/dof) (/dof) (/dof)
1. vphabs*(compTT+diskbb) 1.44 (172.5/120) 1.80 (178.2/99) 1.28 (122.8/96)
2. vphabs*(compTT+diskbb+bbodyrad) 1.36 (161.0/118) 1.43 (139.0/97) 0.97 (91.4/94)
3. vphabs*(compTT+diskbb+bbodyrad+diskline) 1.23 (314.2/255) 1.22 (285.3/234) 1.18 (272.4/231)
4. vphabs*(compTT+diskbb+bbodyrad+diskline+diskline) 1.23 (312.4/254) 1.21 (281.1/233) 1.19 (273.8/230)

Note. – The values for fits of various XSPEC models to the EPIC PN and HEXTE spectra of 4U 1636-536. Shown are the reduced (/dof), the , and the number of degrees of freedom (dof). For models 1 and 2 the energy range 3–10 keV was excluded from the fit.

Table 1 Fits of Various XSPEC Models to the X-Ray Spectra of 4U 1636-536

For the spectral analysis, we removed all X-ray bursts from the data (three for observation 1 and one each for observations 2 and 3). The EPIC PN spectra were binned at about 1/3 of the FWHM detector resolution and were fitted simultaneously with the HEXTE data. We did not include a multiplicative cross-calibration factor between the two instruments. The spectral fitting was performed using XSPEC version 12.4 (Arnaud, 1996). For the EPIC PN spectrum from observation 3, we find significant residuals between data and model at 2.3 keV near the instrumental Au edge. We attribute these residuals to a small offset in the photon energy determination caused be a slightly inaccurate charge transfer efficiency (CTE) calibration in timing mode (see, e.g., Sala et al., 2007). We corrected for this energy offset by introducing a multiplicative gain correction factor of 1.0020 which we determined from a fit. This gain factor, which was fixed in our further spectral analysis, completely removed the residuals near the instrumental Au edge. No gain correction was necessary for the spectra from observations 1 and 2.

Initial fitting of the spectra from all three observations showed significant residuals between data and model below 2 keV near the K-shell absorption edges of O, Ne, Mg, and Si. We attribute these residuals to an overly simplified description of the interstellar absorption edges by current XSPEC models. While these absorption models are generally adequate for EPIC PN spectra, the data presented here has an exceptionally high signal-to-noise ratio so that very small discrepancies between data and model become apparent. We confirmed this interpretation with the RGS spectra which clearly show a complex structure with several narrow absorption features near the K-shell absorption edges of oxygen and neon. This edge structure is not adequately described by any of the absorption models in XSPEC which model the edges as an exponential with a low-energy cutoff. The structure of the oxygen and neon K edges in the RGS spectra is similar to the structure found by Juett et al. (2004, 2006) for several X-ray binaries (including 4U 1636-536) and interpreted as absorption by neutral and ionized oxygen and neon in the interstellar medium. We find no emission lines in the RGS spectra that could explain the residuals in the EPIC PN spectra. Because we are mainly interested in the spectrum at higher energies near the Fe K line, we simply excluded the data near the absorption edges with the largest residuals. The following energy ranges were excluded from the fits: 0.5 keV (O K edge at 0.54 keV), 0.78–0.99 keV (Ne K edge at 0.87 keV), 1.13–1.45 keV (Mg K edge at 1.3 keV), and 1.75–1.87 keV (Si K edge at 1.8 keV).

In order to determine an appropriate model for the continuum emission, we initially fitted the spectra while excluding the 3–10 keV energy range. This excludes any contribution from a relativistically broadened, fluorescent Fe K line which, according to the diskline model in XSPEC (Fabian et al., 1989), is limited to the 3–10 keV energy range for accretion disks around neutron stars. The X-ray spectra of LMXBs are typically characterized by a hard component interpreted as Comptonization of soft photons by a hot corona, a soft component thought to be blackbody radiation from the accretion disk, and a broad Fe K line at 6.4 keV (e.g. Barret et al., 2000). To fit the X-ray spectrum of the continuum emission we therefore combined a compTT component (Titarchuk, 1994) for a Comptonizing corona or boundary layer, a diskbb disk blackbody component (e.g. Makishima et al., 1986), and a vphabs component for photoelectric absorption with variable abundances (model 1). In the compTT model we used the approximation for a disk geometry and fixed the redshift at 0. In the vphabs model we only varied the elemental abundances for O, Ne, Si, and Fe. Abundances for the other elements were not well constrained by the fit and were fixed at their solar values according to Wilms et al. (2000). The spectra from the three observations are reasonably well fitted by model 1 with values of 1.44, 1.80, and 1.28 (Table 1).

We find that the fit can be significantly improved by adding a second blackbody component (bbodyrad) with a temperature of 200 eV (model 2). The additional component improves the for the three observations to 1.36, 1.43, and 0.97, respectively. A second blackbody component with a similar temperature was also introduced by Fiocchi et al. (2006) in their fitting of BeppoSAX spectra of 4U 1636-536 obtained during the high/soft state. The region associated with the blackbody component has an apparent radius of 100 km, which suggests that this emission originates from the accretion disk. We note that the diskbb model (Makishima et al., 1986) was constructed for accretion disks around black holes and may not correctly describe the temperature profile in accretion disks around neutron stars which are subjected to significant central illumination from the stellar surface. The second blackbody component may represent deviations of the temperature profile in the neutron star accretion disk from the diskbb model. No further improvement in the fit was achieved by adding a third blackbody component or other common spectral components. The remaining discrepancy between data and model is probably caused by small calibration uncertainties that are noticeable because of the very high signal-to-noise ratio of the data and, as mentioned above, by the overly simplified modeling of some absorption edges.

For our further analysis we included the data in the 3–10 keV energy range which were previously excluded when fitting models 1 and 2. The data in this energy range show a clear excess over the continuum flux predicted by model 2 which is likely caused by relativistically broadened Fe K line emission. In order to fit the profile of this Fe K line, we added to model 2 a diskline component (Fabian et al., 1989) which describes relativistically broadened line emission from a neutron star accretion disk (model 3). All parameters of the diskline model were allowed to vary during the fit. We initially attempted to vary only the diskline parameters and fix all other parameters at their values from model 2, but we found that a better fit can be achieved by allowing the continuum model parameters to vary as well. This is an indication that the spectrum outside the 3–10 keV energy range is insufficient to correctly determine all continuum model parameters. Model 3 provides a good fit to the data with values of 1.23, 1.22, and 1.18, respectively.

Figure 1.— EPIC PN and HEXTE spectra of 4U 1636-536 for the three observations. The top panels show the observed flux (error bars), the best fit with model 3 (solid line), and the individual additive model components (dotted lines). The individual model components are, from left to right, bbodyrad, diskbb, compTT, and diskline. The bottom panels show the residuals between the observed flux and the model divided by the 1  error of each data point.
Figure 2.— Relativistic iron line profiles in 4U 1636-536. Shown are the observed flux (error bars) and the model flux (solid line), normalized to the continuum flux from model 3 (i.e. the model flux without the diskline component).

Figure 1 shows the observed spectra for the three observations, the best fit with model 3, the individual model components, and the residuals between data and model. The excess of the line emission over the continuum model is shown in Figure 2. The figure clearly shows a broad and asymmetric Fe K line with a peak flux of 5%–8% over the continuum. The line profile is well described by the diskline model. The best-fit parameters of the continuum and line components for model 3 are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Also shown are the uncertainties of the parameters at a 90% confidence level (95% for upper and lower limits). When calculating the confidence regions, all continuum and line parameters were allowed to vary. We found that the commonly used error and steppar commands in XSPEC frequently failed to converge or underestimated the uncertainties. We therefore calculated the confidence regions for many of the parameters by manually searching for the parameter value that produced the appropriate change in .

The continuum parameters for model 3 are generally consistent between the three observations, although the fit indicates a higher disk temperature and stronger Comptonization component for the later observations. We find a significant difference in the rest-frame energy of the Fe K line. For observations 1 and 3, is consistent with 6.4 keV for weakly ionized iron, whereas, for observation 2, is close to 7.0 keV for highly ionized Fe xxvi. The power-law index of the emissivity profile is in the typical range found for iron lines from black hole accretion disks. The diskline model provides lower limits on the disk inclination of for observations 1 and 3 and for observation 2. A lower limit of is clearly inconsistent with the fact that 4U 1636-536 is not an eclipsing system as well as with the results by Casares et al. (2006), who constrained the orbital inclination to 36–74 using phase-resolved spectroscopy. The high limit on the disk inclination for observations 1 and 3 is likely the result of a slightly broader line profile compared to observation 2. Our fit with the diskline model suggests that the line profile is broader than physically possible for a single Fe K emission line. One possible explanation for a broader line profile is a smaller radius of the inner disk edge . However, the best-fit value of for observations 1 and 3 is already at (), the lower limit of the diskline model and the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) for a nonrotating neutron star. An inner disk radius much smaller than , while possible for rotating black holes, is unlikely for the accretion disk around the neutron star in 4U 1636-536, which is rotating at a rate of 581 Hz. The most likely explanation for a broader line profile is the presence of several blended Fe K lines with different rest-frame energies. The presence of iron in more than one ionization state is already indicated by the difference in between the three observations (6.30 and 6.43 keV vs. 7.06 keV).

To test whether blended Fe K lines are a viable explanation, we added a second diskline component to the model (model 4). Because the iron lines are broad and significantly blended, the parameters of the two diskline components are strongly correlated, and it is not possible to fit all line parameters independently. We therefore fixed the line energy of the diskline components at 6.4 and 7.0 keV, respectively, and linked the disk inclination parameters. We also found that the outer disk radius is poorly constrained by the fit, so we kept it fixed at 1000 . The continuum parameters, which were allowed to vary simultaneously with the line parameters, did not change significantly compared to model 3. Adding the second line component does not significantly improve the fit (Table 1), but it does result in more reasonable line parameters (Table 3). The lower limits on the disk inclination change to 64 and 65, respectively, which, unlike for model 3, are now consistent with the 36–74 constraint by Casares et al. (2006). The inner radius for the 7.0 keV component appears to be generally smaller than for the 6.4 keV component as is expected for an accretion disk in which the temperature increases towards the center. The flux ratio of the 7.0 keV and the 6.4 keV component increases from 0.9 to 1.6 to 4.9 between the three observations, indicating that iron is generally in a higher ionization state for the later observations. This is consistent with the increase in X-ray flux between observations. We conclude that the presence of iron at different ionization states is a viable explanation for the unusually broad line profiles and that at least two blended Fe K lines are necessary to obtain consistent line parameters.

Parameter Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3
vphabsaa Photoelectric absorption model with variable abundances. is the neutral hydrogen column density. Elemental abundances are given relative to their solar values according to Wilms et al. (2000). Abundances for elements not shown were fixed at their solar values.
( cm)
O abundance
Ne abundance
Si abundance
Fe abundance
compTTbb Comptonization model according to Titarchuk (1994). is the temperature of the soft seed photons, the temperature of the Comptonizing plasma, and the optical depth. A disk geometry was assumed for the model, and the redshift was fixed at 0.
(keV)
(keV) 9 4
1.3 2.7
Normalization ()
Flux ( erg cm s) 6.1 8.2 10.0
diskbbcc Disk-blackbody model (e.g. Makishima et al., 1986). is the temperature at the inner disk edge, the apparent inner disk radius (see Kubota et al., 1998), and the disk inclination.
(eV)
Normalization
(km)
Flux ( erg cm s) 4.5 13.5 18.3
bbodyraddd Blackbody model. is the blackbody temperature and the apparent radius of the emitting region.
(eV)
Normalization ()
(km)
Flux ( erg cm s) 1.9 2.0 2.3

Note. – Uncertainties are given at a 90% confidence level and limits at a 95% confidence level. Fluxes for individual model components are unabsorbed and for the energy range 0.5–10 keV. and were calculated from the model normalizations assuming a distance of 6 kpc (Galloway et al., 2006).

Table 2 Fit Parameters of the Continuum Components of Model 3
Model 3
Parameter Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3
(keV)
() 6.3 13.3 6.3
()
(deg) 81 64 81
Normalization ()
Equivalent width (eV) 215 98 140
Flux ( erg cm s) 15.7 10.2 21.5
Model 4
Parameter Observation 1 Observation 2 Observation 3
Line 1 Line 2 Line 1 Line 2 Line 1 Line 2
(keV) (6.4) (7.0) (6.4) (7.0) (6.4) (7.0)
–2.7 –2.6 –2.7
() 17.8 11.9 9.8 33.6 10.9
() (1000) (1000) (1000) (1000) (1000) (1000)
(deg) 64 64 65 65 64 64
Normalization ()
Equivalent width (eV) 108 131 54 84 23 100
Flux ( erg cm s) 7.7 7.0 5.7 8.9 3.0 14.6

Note. – is the rest-frame energy of the iron emission line, the power-law index of the emissivity dependence on radius, and the inner and outer disk radius (in units of with being the neutron star mass), and the disk inclination. Also shown is the equivalent line width and the integrated flux for each diskline component. Uncertainties are given at a 90% confidence level and limits at a 95% confidence level. Values in parenthesis indicate that the parameter was fixed during the fit.

Table 3 Fit Parameters of the Iron Line Components of Models 3 and 4

4. Discussion

We have analyzed X-ray spectra of the neutron star LMXB 4U 1636-536 obtained with XMM-Newton and RXTE in 2005, 2007, and 2008. The very high signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra allowed us to clearly detect a broad, relativistic Fe K line from the inner accretion disk. The line is significantly broader than the asymmetric Fe K lines recently found in other neutron star LMXBs (Bhattacharyya & Strohmayer, 2007; Cackett et al., 2008). The broader line profile is likely the result of a high disk inclination in 4U 1636-536. The inclination angles derived from iron line profiles in other neutron star LMXBs have so far been comparatively low. As pointed out by Cackett et al. (2008), this is likely a selection effect because the narrower lines in low-inclination systems are more easily detectable. With the high signal-to-noise ratio of the 4U 1636-536 spectra, we have now been able to measure the broader line profile in a high inclination LMXB. Our analysis of the Fe K line profile places a lower limit of on the disk inclination in 4U 1636-536. This limit is consistent with the 36–74 constraint on the orbital inclination by Casares et al. (2006) and with the nondetection of eclipses.

When fitting the iron line profile with a single relativistic line component, we find a significant difference in the rest-frame line energy between the three observations. This difference is likely caused by a change in the ionization profile of the disk related to the change in X-ray luminosity between the three observations. The line energy derived for the second observation is close to 6.97 keV, the K line energy of Fe xxvi, which suggests that Fe xxvi contributes significantly to the observed line profile. According to our fit with a disk-blackbody model, the highest temperature in the disk is 0.9 keV. Because plasma in thermal equilibrium at this temperature does not contain a significant fraction of Fe xxvi, it is evident that the ionization profile in the disk is strongly affected by photoionization.

We find that the Fe K line profile for two of the observations is too broad to be adequately described by a single relativistic emission line with physically reasonable values of disk inclination and inner disk radius. The broader than expected line profile can be explained by overlapping K lines from iron in different ionization states. The presence of multiple ionization states is also indicated by the difference in the fitted line energy between the three observations. It is evident that multiple line components need to be considered to adequately model the relativistic iron line profiles in neutron star LMXBs. We obtained reasonable line parameters when fitting two iron lines with different rest-frame energies. This is obviously an oversimplification, since many ionization states are probably contributing to the iron line profile. However, because the lines are broad and overlap considerably, it is not possible to constrain the parameters of all line components independently. Even with only two line components, the fit parameters are already strongly correlated, leading to larger parameter uncertainties than a fit with a single line component. In order to adequately model the contribution from multiple ionization states when fitting relativistic Fe K line profiles, improved models are needed that can predict the ionization profile in the accretion disk.

The Fe K line profiles in neutron star LMXBs can in principle be used to place upper limits on the neutron star radius by constraining the inner disk radius (Cackett et al., 2008). Previously, these line profiles have been fitted with only a single line component. However, if more than one ionization state contributes significantly to the Fe K emission, the line profile will be broader than for a single relativistic line, and a fit with a single line model may underestimate the inner disk radius and thus the limit on the neutron star radius. This can be clearly seen for two of our observations for which the upper limit on increases from to and , respectively, when the iron line profile is fitted with two line components instead of a single line component. In contrast, the upper limit on for the second observation decreases from to . It is evident that the constraints on the inner disk radius strongly depend on the assumptions made about the contributing ionization states of iron and that a better understanding of the ionization profile in the disk is needed to obtain reliable limits on the neutron star radius. The contribution of multiple ionization states may also be important for the interpretation of some iron line profiles in accreting black holes. We note that the disk inclination and inner disk radius are strongly anti-correlated when fitting broad iron line profiles, which can lead to large uncertainties of the two parameters. Prior knowledge of the disk inclination can significantly reduce the uncertainty of the inner disk radius.

It was shown by Laurent & Titarchuk (2007) that broad iron line features can also be produced by Compton scattering of line photons in a strong outflow. The expected line profiles for this process are generally characterized by a narrow line at 6.4–6.6 keV from fluorescence in the outflow and a broad, redshifted component below 7 keV from downscattering of the line photons. These line profiles differ qualitatively from those found in 4U 1636-536 which show significant emission above 7 keV and no narrow line component (Fig. 2). We also note that Compton scattering in an outflow only contributes significantly to the iron line emission if the optical depth is at least of order unity, which requires a mass outflow rate on the order of the Eddington mass accretion rate. The X-ray luminosity we observed in 4U 1636-536 was only 5% of the Eddington luminosity, which suggests that the rate of any outflow in 4U 1636-536 was significantly below the Eddington mass accretion rate. It therefore seems unlikely that a large fraction of the observed iron line emission was produced in an outflow.

The authors thank Sudip Bhattacharyya for helpful discussions. D. P. and P. K. acknowledge partial support from NASA grants NNG05GQ18G and NNX07AV06G. This work is based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA member states and the USA (NASA). Facilities: XMM, RXTE

References

  • Arnaud (1996) Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17
  • Barret et al. (2000) Barret, D., Olive, J.-F., Boirin, L., Done, C., Skinner, G. K., & Grindlay, J. E. 2000, ApJ, 533, 329
  • Barret et al. (2007) Barret, D., Olive, J.-F., & Miller, M. C. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1139
  • Bhattacharyya & Strohmayer (2007) Bhattacharyya, S., & Strohmayer, T. E. 2007, ApJ, 664, L103
  • Bradt et al. (1993) Bradt, H. V., Rothschild, R. E., & Swank, J. H. 1993, A&AS, 97, 355
  • Cackett et al. (2008) Cackett, E. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 674, 415
  • Casares et al. (2006) Casares, J., Cornelisse, R., Steeghs, D., Charles, P. A., Hynes, R. I., O’Brien, K., & Strohmayer, T. E. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1235
  • Courvoisier et al. (2003) Courvoisier, T. J.-L., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, L343
  • Fabian (2006) Fabian, A. C. 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 943
  • Fabian et al. (1989) Fabian, A. C., Rees, M. J., Stella, L., & White, N. E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729
  • Fiocchi et al. (2006) Fiocchi, M., Bazzano, A., Ubertini, P., & Jean, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 416
  • Galloway et al. (2006) Galloway, D. K., Psaltis, D., Muno, M. P., & Chakrabarty, D. 2006, ApJ, 639, 1033
  • Jansen et al. (2001) Jansen, F., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1
  • Juett et al. (2004) Juett, A. M., Schulz, N. S., & Chakrabarty, D. 2004, ApJ, 612, 308
  • Juett et al. (2006) Juett, A. M., Schulz, N. S., Chakrabarty, D., & Gorczyca, T. W. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1066
  • Kaaret et al. (1999) Kaaret, P., Piraino, S., Ford, E. C., & Santangelo, A. 1999, ApJ, 514, L31
  • Kubota et al. (1998) Kubota, A., Tanaka, Y., Makishima, K., Ueda, Y., Dotani, T., Inoue, H., & Yamaoka, K. 1998, PASJ, 50, 667
  • Laurent & Titarchuk (2007) Laurent, P., & Titarchuk, L. 2007, ApJ, 656, 1056
  • Makishima et al. (1986) Makishima, K., Maejima, Y., Mitsuda, K., Bradt, H. V., Remillard, R. A., Tuohy, I. R., Hoshi, R., & Nakagawa, M. 1986, ApJ, 308, 635
  • Méndez (2006) Méndez, M. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1925
  • Rothschild et al. (1998) Rothschild, R. E., et al. 1998, ApJ, 496, 538
  • Sala et al. (2007) Sala, G., Greiner, J., Vink, J., Haberl, F., Kendziorra, E., & Zhang, X. L. 2007, A&A, 461, 1049
  • Strohmayer & Markwardt (2002) Strohmayer, T. E., & Markwardt, C. B. 2002, ApJ, 577, 337
  • Strüder et al. (2001) Strüder, L., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18
  • Titarchuk (1994) Titarchuk, L. 1994, ApJ, 434, 570
  • Tomsick et al. (1999) Tomsick, J. A., Kaaret, P., Kroeger, R. A., & Remillard, R. A. 1999, ApJ, 512, 892
  • van Paradijs et al. (1990) van Paradijs, J., et al. 1990, A&A, 234, 181
  • Wijnands et al. (1997) Wijnands, R. A. D., van der Klis, M., van Paradijs, J., Lewin, W. H. G., Lamb, F. K., Vaughan, B., & Kuulkers, E. 1997, ApJ, 479, L141
  • Wilms et al. (2000) Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914
  • Zhang et al. (1997) Zhang, W., Lapidus, I., Swank, J. H., White, N. E., & Titarchuk, L. 1997, IAU Circ., 6541, 1
  • Zhang et al. (1996) Zhang, W., Lapidus, I., White, N. E., & Titarchuk, L. 1996, ApJ, 469, L17
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
296090
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description