Realization of tunable spin-dependent splitting in intrinsic photonic spin Hall effect
We report the realization of tunable spin-dependent splitting in intrinsic photonic spin Hall effect. By breaking the rotational symmetry of a cylindrical vector beam, the intrinsic vortex phases that the two spin components of the vector beam carries, which is similar to the geometric Pancharatnam-Berry phase, is no longer continuous in the azimuthal direction, and leads to observation of spin accumulation at the opposite edge of the beam. Due to the inherent nature of the phase and independency of light-matter interaction, the observed photonic spin Hall effect is intrinsic. Modulating the topological charge of the vector beam, the spin-dependent splitting can be enhanced and the direction of spin accumulation is switchable. Our findings may provide a possible route for generation and manipulation of spin-polarized photons, and enables spin-based photonics applications.
Photonic spin Hall effect (SHE) describes the mutual influence of the photon spin (polarization) and the trajectory (orbit angular momentum) of light beam propagation, i.e., spin-orbit interaction Onoda2004 (); Bliokh2006 (); Bliokh2008A (). It manifests as spin-dependent splitting (SDS) of light, which corresponds to two types of geometric phases: the Rytov-Vladimirskii-Berry phase associated with the evolution of the propagation direction of light and the Pancharatnam-Berry phase related to the manipulation with the polarization state of light Bliokh2008A (); Bliokh2008B (); Hosten2008 (). When a light beam reflecting/refracting at a planar interface or passing through an inhomogeneous anisotropic medium, it may acquire a locally varying geometric phase, i.e., the different part of the beam carrying different geometric phase Hosten2008 (); Qin2009 (); Bomzon2001 (); Marrucci2006 (); Ren2012 (). The interference upon transmission leads to the redistribution of the beam intensity and may show a SDS of light, that is, the photonic SHE. Recent advances in this field provide new opportunities for advantageous measurement of the optical parameters of nanostructures such as metallic film and graphene Zhou2012A (); Zhou2012B (). More importantly, it offers a possible way for generation and manipulation of spin-polarized photons and spin/orbital angular momenta of light, and enables spin-controlled photonics applications Shitrit2013 (); Yin2013 ().
At the interface reflection and refraction of different media, the SDS induced by the photonic SHE is generally very tiny and sensitive to the optical parameters of the media (e.g., refractive indices and thickness, etc.) which makes it difficult to manipulate the SDS with a real medium interface Hosten2008 (); Qin2009 (); Luo2011 (). An inhomogeneous anisotropic medium can produce a giant and tunable SDS in momentum space Shitrit2011 (); Ling2012 (); Li2013 (), but it requires a complex and precise fabrication technique to construct the medium. Actually, the photonic SHE does not always rely on the light-matter interaction; it can be observed in an oblique observation plane respect to the beam propagation direction even in the free space Aiello2009 (); Korger2014 (). This effect is intrinsically dependent upon the polarization geometry of the beam projected on the oblique observation plane rather than any kind of light-matter interaction. Similar to the photonic SHE occurring at the interface reflection and refraction, the induced SDS is fixed and also exceedingly weak.
In this work, we report the realization of tunable SDS in intrinsic photonic SHE by blocking part of a cylindrical vector beam (CVB) with a fan-shaped aperture (FSA). The underlying mechanism is attributed to the inherent, opposite vortex phase that the two spin components (circular polarizations) of the CVB carry, so the observed photonic SHE is intrinsic. This phase is similar to the geometric Pancharatnam-Berry phase which creates a geometric phase gradient in momentum space, and results in the SDS Ling2014 (). By modulating the topological charge of the CVB, the SDS can be enhanced, and the direction of spin accumulation is switchable.
The CVB that exhibits inhomogeneous polarization distribution with rotational symmetry has drawn great attention due to its great potential in many fields including optical manipulation, nonlinear optics, and optical communications (see Zhan2009 () for a review and the references therein). It can be viewed as superposition of two sub-beams carrying opposite spin angular momentum (circular polarization) and opposite orbital angular momentum (vortex phase), and can be geometrically represented by the so-called higher order Poincaré sphere Holleczek2011 (); Milione2011 (). The algebraical description is represented by the following equation:
Here, is a tuning parameter. and are circularly polarized vortex light, with and standing for the right- and left-circular polarizations, respectively. For , Eq. (1) indicates a linear polarized CVB. In this case, the Jones vector of the CVB can be simply written as ( where with the topological charge, the azimuthal angle, and a constant. Other values of represent elliptical polarized CVB. Equation (1) unambiguously illustrates that the two circular polarizations carry just opposite azimuthal vortex phase . This phase is similar to the geometric Pancharatnam-Berry phase which can be obtained in some inhomogeneous anisotropic mediaBomzon2001 (); Marrucci2006 (); Niv2008 (); Ling2012 (); Karimi2014 (). Although the two components have opposite vortex phases and local energy flows, their superposition does not show a helical wave front. They always superpose exactly at the same position and no SDS can be observed, due to the rotational symmetry. When blocking part of a vortex, its intensity distribution and the geometric shadow area just behind the obstacle rotate in the sense of the vortex’s handedness Arlt2003 (); Davis2005 (), so the two spin components of the CVB no longer superpose exactly and separate from each other (see the schematic picture in Fig. 1).
To measure the intrinsic photonic SHE, we set up a Sagnac interferometer to generate the linear polarized CVB, as shown in Fig. 2(a), which can also be conveniently generated by many other methods Zhan2009 (); Bomzon2002 (); Wang2007 (); Jones2009 (). This apparatus relies on the superposition of two equal-intensity beams with opposite circular polarizations and opposite vortex phases, according to Eq. (1). The polarizer (P1) can ensure the light output from the He-Ne laser to be polarization respect to the horizontal direction. Then the beam passes through the polarization beam splitter (PBS) and is split into two equal-intensity beams with the transmission beam being horizontal polarization and the reflection beam vertical polarization. The two sub-beams propagate exactly in a common path. A phase-only spatial light modulator (SLM) is used at small incidence angle, and can apply a vortex phase with any desired topological charge to a horizontal polarization beam which is a good approximation of phase vortex-bearing Laguerre-Gauss beam. A half-wave plate (HWP1) with its optical axis inclined to the horizontal direction is employed to change the vertical polarization to a horizontal one and vice versa for its counter-propagating counterpart. A Dove prism (DP) involves one reflection to change the sign of the topological charge alone one beam path, and ensures that the output beam contains two opposite phase vortexes. Then we use a quarter-wave plate (QWP1) with optical axis orientation changes the two sub-beams into opposite circular polarizations. So the CVB is generated after the QWP1 [see Fig. 2(b)] and its intensity shows a donut-shaped profile similar to a vortex beam. The HWP2 can help to modulate the polarization distribution of the CVB, e.g., changing a radial polarization into an azimuthal polarization or any intermediate states Ling2014 ().
The generated CVB then passes through a FSA [Fig. 2(c)] at normal incidence. For the sake of simplicity and without loss of generality, the FSA can be described by the following expression:
It is known that the Stokes parameter can be used to describe the circular polarization degree Born1999 (), so the SDS of light can be obtained by measuring the parameter pixel by pixel in the output using a typical setup: a quarter-wave plate (QWP2), a polarizer (P2), and a CCD camera. In the experiments, the parameter can be given by
Here, and represent the intensities measured in the circular polarization basis, respectively.
We first consider the influence of the topological charge on the intrinsic photonic SHE. The vortex phase creates a phase gradient in the azimuthal direction, which results in a SDS in (momentum) space: with representing the left and right circular polarization and the unit vector in the azimuthal direction, respectively Shitrit2013 (); Ling2014 (). Hence, this shift is proportional to the value of . However, for a CVB, the SDS cannot be observed in free-space propagation, due to its rotational symmetry. Breaking the rotational symmetry, it is expected to observe the spin accumulation at the edge of the beam.
Figure 3 shows the measured parameters of the photonic SHE for different CVBs and different aperture angles . The spin-dependent shift increases with the rise of the value of . On the other hand, the shift distance is limited by the dimension of the aperture angle because the spin-polarized photons accumulate at the beam edge. Also because of this, the spin-dependent splitting increases with the increase of . If reversing the sign of by modulating the phase picture displayed on the SLM, the direction of spin accumulation is also inverted, as shown in Fig. 4. Because the sign of directly determines the handedness of the vortex phase that the two spin components of the CVB carry. The measured parameters have a little deviation from the expected position (dashed circles in Figs. 3 and 4) due to the unavoidable experiment errors in the measurement.
The SDS of the intrinsic photonic SHE of the CVB can be large enough for direct measurement without using the weak measurement technology Hosten2008 (); Dressel2014 (). With the increase of the value of the CVB, we can directly observe the intensity separation of the and components, as shown in Fig. 5 for . In (a) and (b) for and 2, the two components do not separate enough from each other and show a single-spot profile, however, it still can be discriminated by measuring the parameter just like in Figs. 3 and 4. If the phase gradient is large enough, the and components are almost completely separated, as shown in Fig. 5(c) and 5(d). The induced spin-dependent shift is within millimeters (the beam waist of the He-Ne laser is 0.7 mm and expanded to 2.1 mm by a beam expander), which is many times larger than the optical wavelength (632.8 nm). It is also much larger than that had observed previously in beam reflection and refraction with the shift of the order of a fraction of wavelength Hosten2008 (); Qin2009 (); Yin2013 (). This enables us to observe a giant photonic SHE.
Actually, the focusing behavior of the CVB with axial symmetry broken by a lens has been explored, and its application in optical trapping was suggested Wang2011 (). In the focal plane, the circular polarizations have a spin-dependent rotation with their rotation angle reaching to /2 relative to the aperture edge Arlt2003 (). This is due to that the scalar vortex beam has an azimuthal energy flow along the circumference of the beam when it propagates Padgett1995 (). In our context, we consider the intrinsic SHE of the CVB with rotational symmetry breaking at a propagation distance much less than the Rayleigh distance, so the spin-polarized photons accumulate at the opposite edge of the beam. As mentioned above, the SDS occurs in the space in the azimuthal direction, the induced shift would increase linearly upon beam propagation. Opposite topological charge just reverses the direction of spin accumulation.
In summary, we have experimentally demonstrated the realization of tunable SDS in intrinsic photonic SHE of the CVB by breaking its rotational symmetry using a FSA to block part of the CVB. The spin accumulation occurs at the edge of the beam, and the SDS increases with the topological charge of the CVB and restricts by the aperture angle of the FSA. The underlying mechanism is attributed to the discontinuous local energy flow that results from the broken, opposite vortex phases. It is large enough to be directly observed without using a weak measurement technology. Because of the inherent nature of the phase and independency of light-matter interaction, the observed photonic SHE is intrinsic. This enables us to observe a direct and giant photonic SHE. Our findings reveal that the photonic SHE may be manipulated (enhanced or inverted) by directly tailoring the polarization geometry of light, which may provide a possible route for generation and manipulation of spin-polarized photons, and enables spin-controlled photonics applications.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 61025024, No. 11274106, and No. 11347120), the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department of China (Grant No. 13B003), and the Doctorial Start-up Fund of Hengyang Normal University (Grant No. 13B42).
- (1) M. Onoda, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083901 (2004).
- (2) K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 073903 (2006).
- (3) K. Y. Bliokh, A. Niv, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Nat. Photon. 2, 748 (2008).
- (4) K. Y. Bliokh, Y. Gorodetski, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 030404 (2008).
- (5) O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008).
- (6) Y. Qin, Y. Li, H. He, and Q. Gong, Opt. Lett. 34, 2551 (2009).
- (7) Z. Bomzon, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Opt. Lett. 26, 1424 (2001).
- (8) L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006).
- (9) J. Ren, Y. Li, Y. Lin, Y. Qin, R. Wu, J. Yang, Y. Xiao, H. Yang, and Q. Gong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 171103 (2012).
- (10) X. Zhou, X. Ling, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 251602 (2012).
- (11) X. Zhou, Z. Xiao, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043809 (2012).
- (12) N. Shitrit, I. Yulevich, E. Maguid, D. Ozeri, D. Veksler, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Science 340, 724 (2013).
- (13) X. Yin, Z. Ye, J. Rho, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Science 339, 1405 (2013).
- (14) H. Luo, X. Ling, X. Zhou, W. Shu, S. Wen, and D. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033801 (2011).
- (15) N. Shitrit, I. Bretner, Y. Gorodetski, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Nano Lett. 11, 2038 (2011).
- (16) X. Ling, X. Zhou, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Phy. Rev. A 86, 053824 (2012).
- (17) G. Li, M. Kang, S. Chen, S. Zhang, E. Y. B. Pun, K. W. Cheah, and J. Li, Nano Lett. 13, 4148 (2013).
- (18) A. Aiello, N. Lindlein, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 100401 (2009).
- (19) J. Korger, A. Aiello, V. Chille, P. Banzer, C. Wittmann, N. Lindlein, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113902 (2014).
- (20) X. Ling, X. Zhou, W. Shu, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Sci. Rep. 4, 5557 (2014).
- (21) Q. Zhan, Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1 (2009).
- (22) A. Holleczek, A. Aiello, C. Gabriel, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Opt. Express 19, 9714 (2011).
- (23) G. Milione, H. I. Sztul, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 053601 (2011).
- (24) A. Niv, Y. Gorodetski, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Opt. Lett. 33, 2910 (2008).
- (25) E. Karimi, S. A. Schulz, I. De Leon, H. Qassim, J. Upham and R. W. Boyd, Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e167 (2014).
- (26) J. Arlt, J. Mod. Opt. 50, 1573 (2003)
- (27) J. A. Davis and J. B. Bentley, Opt. Lett. 30, 3204 (2005).
- (28) Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Opt. Lett. 27, 285 (2002).
- (29) X. L. Wang, J. Ding, W. J. Ni, C. S. Guo, and H. T. Wang, Opt. Lett. 32, 3549 (2007).
- (30) P. H. Jones, M. Rashid, M. Makita, and O. M. Maragò, Opt. Lett. 34, 2560 (2009).
- (31) M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (7th edition) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
- (32) J. Dressel, M. Malik, F. M. Miatto, A. N. Jordan, and R. W. Boyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 307 (2014).
- (33) X. L. Wang, K. Lou, J. Chen, B. Gu, Y. Li, and H. T. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 83, 063813 (2011).
- (34) M. J. Padgett and A. Allen, Opt. Commun. 121, 36 (1995).