# Realising a quantum absorption refrigerator with an atom-cavity system

###### Abstract

An autonomous quantum thermal machine comprising a trapped atom or ion placed inside an optical cavity is proposed and analysed. Such a machine can operate as a heat engine whose working medium is the quantised atomic motion, or as an absorption refrigerator which cools without any work input. Focusing on the refrigerator mode, we predict that it is possible with state-of-the-art technology to cool a trapped ion almost to its motional ground state using a thermal light source such as sunlight. We nonetheless find that a laser or similar reference system is necessary to stabilise the cavity frequencies. Furthermore, we establish a direct and heretofore unacknowledged connection between the abstract theory of quantum absorption refrigerators and practical sideband cooling techniques. We also highlight and clarify some assumptions underlying several recent theoretical studies on self-contained quantum engines and refrigerators. Our work indicates that cavity quantum electrodynamics is a promising and versatile experimental platform for the study of autonomous thermal machines in the quantum domain.

## I Introduction

Cooling of atomic motion is an essential precursor to a broad range of experiments with trapped atoms and ions. The development of laser cooling techniques represents a major achievement of late 20 century physics, having enabled spectacular advances in our ability to study and manipulate quantum systems in the laboratory. More recently, researchers have begun to investigate quantum absorption refrigerators: machines which can cool using only a source of heat, without the need for work supplied by an external field, such as a laser. However, the application of such devices to practical tasks in quantum technology, such as the refrigeration of trapped atoms, has barely been studied thus far.

Absorption refrigerators belong to the class of autonomous thermal machines (ATMs), i.e. those which operate without external control or work. Although such devices have existed since the dawn of thermodynamics, they have attracted renewed interest from quantum physicists Kosloff2014arpc (); Goold2016jpa () for several reasons. ATMs are attractive to the theorist because they dispense of the need for externally supplied work, whose precise definition in a quantum setting is debatable Campisi2011rmp (); Horodecki2013a (); Skrzypczyk2014 (). Furthermore, naturally occurring biological ATMs, such as photosynthetic complexes, have been found to exhibit quantum coherent dynamics Huelga2013cp (); Killoran2015jcp (). Most importantly, ATMs potentially offer tremendous practical reductions in energy expenditure. This is because work is usually performed on a quantum system using a coherent field, which consumes a macroscopic quantity of power merely in order to control microscopic degrees of freedom. Conversely, an absorption chiller may be powered by ubiquitous sources of thermal energy, such as excess heat generated by another process, or indeed sunlight. In principle, absorption refrigerators can therefore function at no additional energy cost beyond that required to build the device in the first place.

In the recent theoretical literature, a number of quantum absorption refrigerator (QAR) models have been proposed and studied Linden2010prl (); Levy2012prl (); Levy2012pre (); Gelbwaser2014pre (); Correa2014pre (); Silva2015pre (); Wang2015pre (); Leggio2015pra (); Doyeux2016pre (). In many cases, these models exhibit new, occasionally controversial, behaviours that are absent from their classical counterparts. Quantum correlations have variously been argued to increase efficiency Brunner2013 (), or to play no operational role Correa2013pre (), depending on the model considered. Performance advantages due to non-equilibrium Correa2014 (); Leggio2015pra () or spatially correlated Doyeux2016pre () states of the heat reservoirs have been discussed. Interesting effects have also been predicted in the transient regime, where quantum oscillations may facilitate fast cooling below the steady-state temperature Mitchison2015njp (); Brask2015pre (). On the other hand, only a handful of concrete experimental proposals for QARs have been put forward Chen2012epl (); Mari2012prl (); Venturelli2013prl (). It is therefore of interest to explore other systems which could realise QARs, in order to better understand their physical limitations and capabilities in a practical context.

With this goal in mind, we introduce and study a novel design for a QAR in a cavity optomechanical set-up using trapped atoms Kimble1999prl (); McKeever2003prl (); Birnbaum2005nat (); Fortier2007prl () or ions Russo2009apb (); Sterk2012pra (); Stute2012apb (). We identify the necessary ingredients for the construction of such a machine, which include high-finesse optical cavities whose line width is smaller than the oscillation frequency of the trapped atom, although neither strong coupling nor high cooperativity are needed. Assuming that the necessary conditions are met, we show that driving the cavity with incoherent thermal light leads to significant cooling of the atomic motion. In particular, we predict that sunlight may be used to cool a trapped ion down to its motional ground state with high fidelity. Interestingly, we find that a laser is indispensable even in this context, however its role in our set-up is not to perform work, but rather to provide a stable frequency reference. Furthermore, the refrigeration cycle in our scheme can be easily understood by direct analogy with laser sideband cooling. This establishes a direct connection between the abstract theory of QARs and practical cooling techniques that are well known in atomic physics.

Trapped-ion systems have already proved to be a successful experimental testing ground for quantum thermodynamics, with the recent proposal and subsequent realisation of a heat engine using a single ion as the working medium Abah2012prl (); Rossnagel2015arXiv. However, it is not yet clear how useful work could be extracted from such a device. In contrast, we focus on cooling, a task that has a clear practical application in quantum state preparation. We also note that several practical laser cooling schemes for trapped atoms using optical cavities already exist Horak1997prl (); Maunz2004nat (); Nuszmann2005natphys (); Leibrandt2009prl (). Our proposal differs from all of these, primarily because the energy for cooling is provided by a thermal source such as sunlight. Finally, we mention a closely related recent article Mari2012prl (), describing a QAR comprising a nano-mechanical oscillator interacting with a pair of optical resonators. Our scheme works by a similar mechanism, but relies on a different interaction Hamiltonian, and is capable of achieving temperatures lower by many orders of magnitude, even with much less intense thermal light input. We aim to elucidate the connections between schemes such as that of Ref. Mari2012prl (), conventional sideband cooling, and other QAR models discussed in the recent theoretical literature.

This paper is arranged as follows. In Section II we outline the general theory of the three-body quantum absorption refrigerator and introduce some basic concepts. Section III is concerned with an idealised model involving a trapped atom inside a single optical cavity, which serves to illustrate some of the physical principles and limitations in a simplified context. In Section IV we describe our main proposal to build an absorption refrigerator using trapped atoms or ions inside a pair of optical cavities, and analyse the performance of the refrigerator in detail. We discuss our results and conclude in Section V. Mathematical details are provided in the appendices.

## Ii Three-body quantum absorption refrigerator

In this section we introduce some fundamental concepts which form the basis for our work. In particular, we provide a concise, general exposition of the abstract model of the three-body QAR introduced in Refs. Linden2010prl (); Levy2012prl (). We also take this opportunity to introduce the useful concepts of virtual qubits and virtual temperatures, and to justify the figures of merit used to characterise refrigerator performance in subsequent sections. Readers familiar with the literature on QARs may wish to skip to Section III, where we specialise to atom-cavity systems. Unless otherwise indicated, we use units of energy and temperature such that and .

### ii.1 Description of the model

The three-body quantum absorption refrigerator comprises three subsystems with Hamiltonian

(1) |

where the operators act non-trivially on subsystem only. Subsystem is the body to be cooled. We assume that it has an equally spaced energy spectrum with level splitting , i.e.

(2) |

where is the local Hilbert space dimension (possibly infinite). This general form may describe a qubit, a spin or a harmonic oscillator. We also assume that and each possess at least one pair of eigenstates differing in energy by , such that

(3) |

The form of and is otherwise arbitrary. The subsystems are coupled together by the three-body interaction

(4) |

where is the interaction energy and is a lowering operator connecting pairs of Hamiltonian eigenstates separated by an energy , i.e.

(5) |

while is the corresponding raising operator. The condition (3) ensures that , so that the interaction (4) enacts resonant transitions between degenerate energy eigenstates of .

Cooling is achieved by coupling subsystem to a hot thermal bath at temperature , while subsystems and remain coupled to the environment at temperature . Energy exchange between the subsystems then allows heat to naturally flow from the hot reservoir to the colder environment. However, due to the specific form of the interaction (4), subsystem can only absorb a quantum of energy from the hot body by simultaneously absorbing energy from , thus leading to cooling. The heat flow through the refrigerator is illustrated in Fig. 1.

### ii.2 Virtual qubits and virtual temperatures

The concepts of virtual qubits and virtual temperatures provide a convenient and intuitive way to analyse autonomous thermal machines Brunner2012pre (). A virtual qubit is a pair of states in the composite Hilbert space of subsystems and which directly couples to the target subsystem . By choosing the parameters of the system appropriately, the virtual qubit can be placed at an effective virtual temperature which may be lower than . The operation of the refrigerator can then be understood as a simple thermalisation process between and the virtual qubit.

To make this notion explicit, we observe that the interaction Hamiltonian (4) can be written as

(6) |

where . Eqs. (3) and (5) together imply that

(7) |

This means that is a lowering operator connecting pairs of states differing by an energy in the composite Hilbert space of and . Each of these pairs of states is called a virtual qubit. The interaction (6) then describes resonant energy exchange between the virtual qubits and .

When each subsystem is at thermal equilibrium with its respective bath, the populations of the virtual qubit states are thermally distributed at a virtual temperature

(8) |

That is to say, each pair of virtual qubit states is populated in the ratio . As long as the parameters of the refrigerator are chosen so that , subsystem will be pushed towards a lower temperature as it equilibrates with the virtual qubits under the interaction (6). This effect is counteracted by the thermalising influence of the reservoir interacting with , thus establishing a heat current flowing from the environment surrounding into the refrigerator. See Ref. Brunner2012pre () for a more complete discussion of virtual qubits and temperatures.

To conclude this section, we briefly mention that if the assumption that is relaxed, one can arrange for to take any value by adjusting the bath temperatures and energy splittings. If , then the steady-state temperature of is increased and the system operates as a heat pump. On the other hand, if the machine tries to induce population inversion in the state of , which can be thought of as the quantum analogue of a classical heat engine lifting a weight Brunner2012pre (). In the following, we restrict our attention to the absorption chiller mode, where . However, our results could be applied equally well to the construction and study of autonomous quantum heat pumps and engines.

### ii.3 Figures of merit

In order to analyse the performance of a refrigerator, one must choose figures of merit. The appropriate figure of merit depends on the problem at hand, as we now explain.

#### ii.3.1 Coefficient of performance and cooling power

From one viewpoint, the refrigerator can be seen as a device which extracts heat from the environment surrounding subsystem . Thus, the refrigerator performance is characterised by the stationary heat currents flowing to and from the reservoirs. The cooling power gives the heat current into the refrigerator from the environment of , while gives the input power corresponding to the heat current flowing in from the hot reservoir. Therefore, the relevant figure of merit is the coefficient of performance .

Note that this point of view makes sense only if the reservoirs connected to subsystems and are considered as separate entities. If subsystems and are in fact connected to the same environment, the net effect of the machine is simply to dump energy per unit time from the hot reservoir into this environment.

Assuming that the reservoirs connected to and are independent, we can estimate the coefficient of performance using the equations of motion for the mean local energies of subsystems and , viz.

(9) |

for , where the second term on the right-hand side (RHS) follows from the Heisenberg equation generated by the interaction Hamiltonian (4). In the stationary state, the derivatives of the mean energies vanish, leading to the following simple expression for the coefficient of performance:

(10) |

We see that the coefficient of performance grows without limit as is increased while holding fixed (assuming that Eq. (3) is always satisfied). It is important to note that our approximate analysis ignores the contribution of the interaction energy to the heat currents, and is therefore only strictly correct in the weak-coupling limit of vanishingly small Correa2013pre ().

#### ii.3.2 Achievable temperature and cooling time

In the above scenario, one uses a microscopic machine to cool a macroscopic body, namely the reservoir connected to . Perhaps a more appropriate application of a quantum refrigerator is to cool a microscopic system, namely subsystem itself. From this viewpoint, the most important figure of merit is the achievable temperature (or more generally, the achievable energy and entropy) of subsystem Mitchison2015njp ().

The achievable steady-state temperature can be estimated from the virtual temperature given by Eq. (8). This takes its minimal value when the temperature of the hot bath is large, from which we find that

(11) |

where we have used Eqs. (3) and (10) to rewrite the virtual temperature in terms of the coefficient of performance . We find that the virtual temperature is minimised when is small. This illustrates that the standard thermodynamic measures of steady-state refrigerator performance are essentially irrelevant when the task at hand is to cool a quantum system having a finite energy.

Since the refrigerator is out of equilibrium, the thermodynamic temperature of may not be strictly defined. For our purposes, it is sufficient to adopt the mean energy as a figure of merit, rather than the temperature. This also provides an adequate measure of entropy, since the von Neumann entropy of a state with mean energy is upper-bounded by that of a Gibbs state having the same mean energy. If the cooling is subject to time constraints, the relaxation time (the time taken for to reach its stationary value) is also a measure of performance. However, the relaxation time is a non-universal figure of merit since it may depend on the initial conditions.

Throughout the remainder of this article we adopt the present framework, where the objective is to cool subsystem . This viewpoint is particularly appropriate for quantum technology applications. Here, the motivation for cooling a quantum system is typically to maximise the efficiency of subsequent control operations by reducing uncertainty over the initial conditions, i.e. by minimising the entropy of the quantum system. We therefore neglect traditional efficiency measures such as the coefficient of performance , choosing rather to focus on the mean energy of the subsystems constituting the refrigerator, in particular that of the target body .

## Iii Single-cavity configuration

In this section we introduce an idealised model of a quantum absorption refrigerator comprising a trapped atom inside a single optical cavity. In order to simplify the analysis, several details are disregarded in this section. Nevertheless, this simplified model is sufficient to illustrate the physical principles involved. The present toy model also has the advantage of making the connection with laser sideband cooling obvious, while demonstrating some of the practical limitations which arise in the cavity quantum electrodynamics (CQED) setting.

### iii.1 Description of the system

We consider a single atom or ion of mass confined in the direction by a harmonic potential with oscillation frequency . The atom is assumed to possess a pair of relevant internal electronic states and separated by an energy . The trap is placed inside an optical cavity whose axis is aligned in the direction. The minimum of the harmonic potential is placed at a node of the electric field of a cavity mode with frequency chosen such that . We assume that and , as appropriate for typical optical and vibrational frequencies. The geometry of the problem is depicted schematically in Fig. 2.

The free Hamiltonian of the system is

(12) |

where the bosonic ladder operators and respectively create motional quanta (phonons) and light quanta (photons), while is the atomic lowering operator. We have assumed that all other electronic states and vibrational or cavity modes are far off-resonant and can be neglected.

The interaction between the atom and the cavity field in the dipole approximation reads as

(13) |

where is the cavity coupling constant and the Lamb-Dicke parameter is defined as , with the speed of light in vacuum. The form of the interaction (13) reflects the symmetry of the problem when the harmonic potential minimum coincides exactly with an electric field node. The electric field operator then changes sign under a parity transformation of the atomic centre-of-mass coordinate. This gives rise to a selection rule allowing only transitions between motional states of opposite parity. Since the vibrational energy eigenstates have definite parity, the absorption or emission of a photon must therefore be accompanied by a change in the number of phonons.

We now show that the system approximately realises a QAR, and estimate its virtual temperature. We work in the limit , which requires that the cavity mode wavelength is much larger than the characteristic length scale of atomic motion. We can therefore invoke the Lamb-Dicke approximation (LDA) and expand Eq. (13) to first order in . We also make the rotating wave approximation (RWA) by discarding counter-rotating terms at optical frequency, leading to

(14) |

Assuming that terms counter-rotating at frequency can also be neglected, we finally obtain

(15) |

We therefore find under these assumptions that the system exhibits a three-body interaction of the type (4). Note that the approximation leading to Eq. (17) is valid only when . Eq. (17) also assumes that the line widths of relevant transitions are much smaller than the trap frequency , as discussed in detail in Section III.3.

The heat reservoir is provided by coupling thermal light at a high temperature into the cavity resonator. Assuming that the thermal light source is well collimated, the electronic transition couples only to the ambient radiation field at room temperature , which leads to spontaneous emission. Meanwhile, the motion of the atom undergoes intrinsic heating in the trap, for example due to fluctuations of the trapping potential.

The virtual qubit states in the machine are the pairs , where denotes a Fock state with quanta in the cavity mode. The virtual temperature of the refrigerator is therefore

(16) |

Since and , we find that

(17) |

The ratio of frequencies is typically or less, implying that very low virtual temperatures are achievable.

The refrigerator operation can be understood by a straightforward analogy with laser sideband cooling. The optical cavity behaves as a filter which singles out frequencies close to the red sideband . Pumping the cavity with thermal light increases the number of photons with the correct frequency to drive the red sideband transition. Spontaneous emission then resets the electronic state, completing the cooling cycle (see Fig. 3). So long as the blue sideband frequency is far off-resonant, the absorption of thermal cavity photons drives the motion towards its ground state.

### iii.2 Master equation

In order to study the dynamics of the model, we employ a quantum master equation for the density operator of the form

(18) |

The superoperators are dissipative contributions due to the coupling of each subsystem to its respective reservoir. The term describes motional heating, corresponds to the thermal pumping of the cavity, while relates to spontaneous emission.

Introducing the general notation for a Lindblad dissipator

(19) |

the motional heating is described by

(20) |

where is the equilibrium phonon number at room temperature. Since to an excellent approximation under typical laboratory conditions, the dissipator (20) describes approximately linear growth of the phonon number at a constant heating rate . Pumping of the cavity with thermal light is described by

(21) |

where is the cavity line width and is the equilibrium photon number at temperature . For simplicity, we have assumed here that the thermal driving is applied to both sides of the cavity. Spontaneous emission is described by the Liouvillian

(22) |

with , while is the angular distribution of emitted photons as a function of , where is the angle subtended from the axis by the photon wave vector. Note that at optical frequencies and room temperature, and therefore the absorption term on the second line of Eq. (III.2) is typically negligible.

### iii.3 Line broadening and other constraints

Unfortunately, the single-cavity refrigerator suffers from several severe practical limitations. The most important of these is due to line broadening. The picture illustrated in Fig. 3, described by the Hamiltonian (15), is valid when the sideband transitions are “sharp”, in the sense of having a well-defined frequency. However, thermal dissipation implies some unavoidable energy uncertainty due to the finite lifetime of the states involved. Significant cooling is only possible in the sideband-resolved regime, where the frequency uncertainty of the relevant transitions is much less than . Otherwise, line broadening brings the blue sideband transition partially onto resonance, leading to heating rather than cooling. In particular, this means that we must have for effective refrigeration.

In order to illustrate the effect of line broadening, we compute the steady-state phonon occupation , where is the stationary quantum state satisfying , with given by the RHS of Eq. (18). The problem is simplified by taking the interaction Hamiltonian (14) under the LDA and RWA, and making the approximation , leaving just five free parameters governing the phonon population dynamics: , , , and . We compute the stationary state by representing as a matrix and solving the eigenvalue equation . The integral in Eq. (III.2) is numerically approximated by a trapezoidal rule. We take , as appropriate for a point dipole aligned perpendicularly to the cavity axis. Sampling a grid of 100 evenly spaced points in the interval is sufficient to obtain convergence. The resulting Liouvillian matrix has low sparsity and is therefore challenging to diagonalise, which limits the achievable Hilbert space dimension considerably. We use 21 phonon states and 4 cavity photon states in total. The results are therefore quantitatively inaccurate, but suffice to obtain qualitative trends.

The qualitative dependence of on the dissipation rates and is plotted for some example parameters in Fig. 4. We see that the optimum operating regime is , as expected. The performance deteriorates rapidly as or is increased above the trap frequency . Increasing the spontaneous emission rate has a particularly adverse effect, because the recoil momentum of emitted photons leads to further motional heating (see Eq. (III.2)). This is highly problematic, because the spontaneous emission rate in atomic two-level systems is fixed by Nature, and may be much larger than a typical vibrational frequency, on the order of tens or hundreds of megaherz.

The deleterious effect of line broadening is worsened when the trapping potential minimum is not placed exactly on the electric-field node of the cavity. Outside of the sideband-resolved regime, we have found that the system is remarkably sensitive to small misalignments of the trapping potential: displacements of a few nanometres away from the cavity field node lead to an almost complete disappearance of the cooling effect. This can be understood as follows. Away from the node, cavity photons may be emitted and absorbed without affecting the vibrational state of the atom. Photon absorption in particular depletes the cavity field and reduces the effective temperature of the hot reservoir. Although these transitions, which occur at the so-called carrier frequency , are off-resonant in principle, they become important when levels are broadened.

Finally, in order to enforce the resonance condition , it is necessary to stabilise the length of the cavity to prevent frequency drift. This may be achieved, for example, by continuously driving the cavity with a laser field and using the Pound-Drever-Hall technique Black2001ajp (). Importantly, this stabilisation can be performed using other polarisation modes or different cavity harmonics from those directly relevant for the refrigerator’s operation. Of course, this use of an external laser field means that the machine is not truly autonomous. However, the laser does not supply any work used directly for cooling. Rather, its role is to provide a stable frequency reference.

## Iv Crossed-cavity configuration

In this section we describe a detailed model of a quantum absorption refrigerator comprising a trapped atom within a pair of perpendicular optical cavities. The purpose of the additional cavity is to ameliorate the adverse effects of spontaneous emission. We predict that such a machine powered by sunlight can cool a trapped ion to near its motional ground state, and explicitly delineate the parameter regime in which this is possible.

### iv.1 Description of the model

As in Section III.1, we consider a harmonically trapped atom or ion of mass , possessing a pair of electronic states and separated by energy . In this section we explicitly model the atomic motion in both the and directions, although it will shortly be shown that the coordinate decouples from the dynamics for our chosen configuration. For simplicity of presentation, we make the inessential assumption of equal oscillation frequencies in both the and directions, given by .

The atom is placed inside a pair of optical cavities and , with axes aligned in the and direction, respectively. These cavities have relevant modes at frequencies and . The minimum of the trap potential is placed a distance from a node of the electric field in cavity , and a distance from an anti-node of cavity . The geometry of the problem is indicated in Fig. 5.

The free Hamiltonian of the system is

(23) |

where () creates motional excitations in the direction ( direction), () creates photons in the cavity parallel to the axis ( axis), and . The light-matter interaction Hamiltonian reads as

(24) |

where is the coupling constant, is the Lamb-Dicke parameter, and is the dimensionless misalignment for cavity . As before, all other cavity and vibrational modes and electronic states are assumed be far off-resonant.

Assuming that , we expand Eq. (IV.1) to first order in small quantities and make the RWA, which yields

(25) |

where and . We see that to lowest order, the excitation of phonons in the direction is suppressed close to the anti-node of cavity . The motion in the direction is therefore neglected from here on. In order to simplify the notation we also set and .

We demand that the cavities be tuned to two-photon resonance with the red sideband, , yet detuned from the carrier by an amount , where . Direct excitation of the internal state of the atom, and the associated spontaneous emission, is thus strongly suppressed. However, due to the resonance condition , the cavities can coherently exchange photons, assisted by the creation or destruction of phonons. In the following subsection, we show that this process is described by the effective interaction

(26) |

where . This obviously corresponds to the general form (4).

The refrigerator is powered by pumping cavity mode with hot thermal light at temperature , while cavity mode couples to the radiation field at room temperature . The virtual qubit states for this system are the pairs . The virtual temperature is given by

(27) |

since and , and we see again that very low virtual temperatures can be obtained.

The operation of the refrigerator can be understood by analogy with Raman laser sideband cooling (see Fig. 6). Addressing the red sideband with a two-photon transition avoids populating the fast-decaying excited electronic state. The line width of the transition is therefore determined by the cavity decay rates, which in principle may be made much smaller than the spontaneous emission rate. This makes achieving the sideband-resolved regime a feasible prospect in this system.

The cavity lengths must be actively stabilised in order to avoid frequency drift away from the resonance condition . As described in Section III.3, this stabilisation can be performed non-invasively using a laser. This makes the double-cavity refrigerator not truly autonomous. However, we emphasise again that the role of the laser is to provide a frequency reference, rather than to directly perform work used for cooling.

### iv.2 Master equation

We write the density operator of the full system including the electronic degrees of freedom as . This satisfies the master equation

(28) |

where and are respectively defined by Eqs. (20) and (III.2). The coupling of cavity to the external electromagnetic field is described by

(29) |

where is the cavity line width and is the equilibrium photon number at temperature . Eq. (29) represents thermal driving applied to only one side of cavity , while the other side couples to the vacuum (which approximates the electric field at room temperature). Cavity couples to the environment via the Liouvillian

(30) |

where is the corresponding line width, and , with for optical frequencies at room temperature.

We note that direct excitation of the electronic degrees of freedom is suppressed by the large detuning . Furthermore, will typically be the largest dissipative frequency scale in the system, so that correlations between the electronic degrees of freedom and the rest of the system decay rapidly on the time scales relevant for the dynamics of the atomic motion. These assumptions enable us to simplify the model by adiabatically eliminating the excited electronic state within a Born-Markov approximation.

Using standard projection operator techniques QuantumNoise (); Breuer2007book (); VanKampen (); Rivas2010njp (), a master equation describing the reduced density matrix of the motional and cavity modes in the electronic ground state manifold is derived in Appendix A. The result is

(31) |

where

(32) |

The Hamiltonian is a small Lamb-shift contribution which renormalises the energy levels of . The interaction term is of the form

(33) |

In the limit , the effective coupling constant is found to be . The generator describes additional dissipative processes due to spontaneous emission from the excited state, which are suppressed by a factor of order relative to the coherent coupling . Full expressions for all parameters entering Eq. (31) can be found in the appendix.

We now summarise the approximations underlying Eq. (31). The assumption of negligible population of the excited electronic state is valid so long as the detuning is sufficiently large, i.e.

(34) |

We have also neglected the motional recoil due to spontaneous emission. This is justified when the spontaneous emission is isotropic and the system is deep in the Lamb-Dicke regime, so that

(35) |

The Born-Markov assumption requires the memory time of the electronic degrees of freedom to be much shorter than the characteristic time scales of the effective evolution, which implies

(36) |

where represents any energy shift appearing in . Finally, in order to put the master equation (31) into Lindblad form, we must perform a rotating-wave approximation, valid when

(37) |

which corresponds to the definition of the sideband-resolved regime for this system.

### iv.3 Phonon dynamics

Parameter | Symbol | Value |
---|---|---|

Hot temperature | 5800 K | |

Room temperature | 300 K | |

Trap frequency | 5 MHz | |

Lamb-Dicke parameter | 0.041 | |

Carrier frequency | 810 THz | |

Spontaneous emission rate | 20 MHz | |

Trap heating rate | 10 quanta/s | |

Cavity misalignment | 10 nm |

In this subsection we characterise the performance of the refrigerator in terms of the steady-state phonon occupation , focusing specifically on cooling using sunlight as an energy source. We take representative parameters pertaining to Yb(listed in Table 1). This species is a good choice due to its low mass and correspondingly small photon recoil, in addition to the existence of a closed dipole-allowed cooling transition. However, one could equally well consider other species of ion or neutral atom.

From here on we set and for simplicity. We compute by solving , with defined by the RHS of Eq. (31). We use a truncated Hilbert space with 71 phonon states and 4 states per cavity mode. Such a small Hilbert space dimension for the cavity modes is justified since the mean number of cavity photons in the steady state is and in cavities and , respectively, for all parameters considered. We have checked that decreasing the Hilbert space dimension leads to negligible changes in the results.

Our predictions for are shown in Fig. 7. We observe that sunlight at K is sufficient to drive the phonon almost to its ground state, so long as the effective coupling constant is sufficiently large. In Fig. 7(a) we show that, in the regime of effective cooling, the steady-state phonon occupation is reduced by increasing for fixed . Nevertheless, must remain smaller than for the system to remain in the sideband-resolved regime (Eq. (37)), which represents a key factor limiting the achievable steady-state phonon occupation. In Fig. 7(b) we demonstrate that increasing for fixed can improve performance by suppressing incoherent effects associated with spontaneous emission.

In the limit of and , we can give a rough analytical estimate of the relaxation time. In this regime we can derive an effective evolution equation for the motional degrees of freedom by tracing over the cavity modes, as shown in Appendix B. This approximate equation of motion can be solved to give the phonon population as a function of time:

(38) |

where is the steady-state phonon number, is the initial population, and the relaxation rate is .

### iv.4 Collective coupling enhancement in many-ion systems

In this subsection we generalise to the scenario where multiple atoms are trapped inside the cavities. We focus in particular on ion-trap systems, where the Coulomb interaction couples the motion of the different ions. The normal vibrational modes of the system are thus small collective oscillations about the mechanical equilibrium. We now show that if ions of the same species are placed inside the crossed-cavity refrigerator, an -fold enhancement of the coupling between photons and phonons can be obtained.

The free Hamiltonian of the system is

(39) |

Here, creates a phonon of a normal mode with frequency , is the atomic lowering operator for atom and we have allowed for variations of the electronic transition frequencies , due to inhomogeneous magnetic fields, for example. All other modes and electronic states are assumed to be off-resonant. The interaction Hamiltonian in the LDA and RWA reads as

(40) |

where , , with the cavity coupling constants for the ion with equilibrium position , while are the Lamb-Dicke parameters and are the dimensionless misalignments, where () is the distance in the direction ( direction) between and the field node of cavity (anti-node of cavity ).

We assume again that the cavities are detuned from the electronic transition frequencies, , with . After adiabatically eliminating the electronic excited states according to the procedure in Appendix A, we find an effective interaction of the form

(41) |

In the limit , the collective coupling constant is found to be

(42) |

The effective collective coupling can be either enhanced or suppressed compared to the single-particle case, depending on the symmetry of the normal mode in question. For example, let us take and assume that and . For the stretch mode, with , we find that . On the other hand, for the centre-of-mass mode, with , we find a two-fold enhancement of the coupling, i.e. , where is the single-ion effective coupling. In general, the centre-of-mass oscillations experience enhanced collective coupling, since for this vibrational mode is constant. Therefore, it is possible to improve the refrigerator’s performance when cooling the centre-of-mass mode by incorporating many ions inside the cavities.

Note that the heating rate may also increase with the number of ions. However, the estimate given by Eq. (38) indicates that the collective coupling enhancement still leads to an improvement in the achievable temperature and relaxation time so long as the heating rate increases slower than .

## V Conclusion

To summarise, we have analysed the possibility of creating an autonomous thermal machine (ATM) in the setting of cavity quantum electrodynamics (CQED). In particular, we have shown that it is possible to construct a refrigerator which cools the motion of a trapped atom using sunlight. This would constitute perhaps the first example of a quantum absorption chiller which can achieve technologically useful temperatures.

In principle, such a refrigerator powered by sunlight costs nothing to operate in daylight hours (under clement weather conditions). This is clearly an improvement on power-hungry and thermodynamically inefficient cooling lasers. In practice however, we find that the technical difficulty of stabilising the cavity frequencies makes the use of a laser, or similar frequency reference system, unavoidable with present technology.

Commercially available laser systems enjoy stability, reliability and flexibility, spanning a range of optical and ultra-violet frequencies. These properties are unmatched by optical cavities currently available in CQED experiments. Therefore, absorption chillers of the kind we envisage are unlikely to supersede laser-driven cooling schemes in the near future. Nevertheless, our results demonstrate that if the intrinsic stability of optical resonators can be improved, ATMs could in principle play a useful role in quantum state preparation.

A more immediately relevant feature of our proposal is that it offers a versatile experimental platform to study the physics of ATMs. One advantage of our scheme is that the frequencies of — and the couplings between — different degrees of freedom are tunable by means of external control fields, or by modifying the cavity lengths mechanically. We have also shown that the coupling can be enhanced -fold when ions of the same species are incorporated inside the refrigerator. Note that experiments demonstrating collective cavity coupling enhancement in trapped-ion systems have already achieved Herskind2009nat (); Albert2012pra (), implying that very large three-body interaction energies could be obtained. In such a regime, our simple local dissipation model is invalid, and delocalised dissipation effects should become important Correa2013pre ().

Another attractive feature of the CQED setting is the wide variety of measurements that are available. For example, a different species of ion placed inside the trap could be used to make non-demolition measurements of steady-state properties, such as the phonon number Bermudez2013prl (). One could also continuously and non-destructively monitor the state of the cavity fields using appropriately placed photodetectors. This would yield direct information on the rate of energy dissipation into the environment, as well as opening up a new potential arena for exploring quantum thermodynamics with measurement feedback Brandner2015njp (); Vidrighin2016prl (). Non-thermal or non-Markovian reservoirs could be engineered by modifying the spectrum or statistics of the radiation incident on the cavity Murch2012prl (), or by tickling the ion-trap electrodes with suitably filtered electrical noise Myatt2000nat (). We also note that analogous set-ups using different kinds of quantum emitters such as superconducting qubits, quantum dots or diamond color centers may be envisaged.

On a conceptual level, our study provides a number of further insights. We found a simple and intuitive interpretation of quantum absorption refrigerators in terms of sideband transitions. The present context of atomic cooling makes the connection between these two concepts manifest, however this link is in fact completely general. Any three-body absorption refrigerator can be understood in terms of a red sideband transition, which is excited by the absorption of quanta from a thermally populated auxiliary system, itself connected to a hot reservoir. The role of the second, colder reservoir is to then quickly reset the state of the refrigerator by a transition at the carrier frequency (that is, at frequency ), leaving the target system with one less quantum of energy. Thus, sideband transitions provide an alternative framework for understanding quantum ATMs which is complementary to the standard picture in terms of virtual qubits and temperatures.

We also found that, just as in laser sideband cooling, the existence of blue sideband transitions limit the thermal dissipation rates and the three-body interaction strength to be less than the frequency of the target subsystem, i.e. one must be in the sideband-resolved regime. This constraint is rather general, because blue sideband transitions (or more generally, off-resonant transitions) exist for any absorption refrigerator governed by an interaction Hamiltonian composed of a single product of Hermitian operators (rather than a sum of such products). We thus expect a similar sideband-resolved condition to generically constrain the achievable power and other relevant thermodynamic quantities describing these machines.

As we have shown, an absorption refrigerator transferring energy from motional degrees of freedom to optical photons can achieve remarkably low temperatures in principle. This results from the huge separation between vibrational and optical frequencies, leading to extremely small virtual temperatures (see Eq. (27)). The same principle underlies other recent proposals to build thermal machines using cavity optomechanical systems Mari2012prl (); Zhang2014prl (). However, this separation of frequency scales also implies an instability of the system to relatively small fluctuations or drifts of the optical frequencies. This suggests that a practical operating regime for truly autonomous quantum thermal machines will be such that the natural frequencies of the constituent subsystems are commensurate with each other.

In the present example, the effects of frequency drift can be overcome by weakly driving the cavity with a laser. This indicates that the truly essential resource for cooling in the quantum regime is a stable frequency reference, or equivalently an accurate clock. Given such a frequency reference, we have shown that chaotic thermal energy suffices to cool the system almost to its ground state. If one adopts the view that the heat energy driving the absorption refrigerator is a free resource, the performance of the machine is then ultimately limited by the efficiency of the frequency reference or clock. A natural question thus arises regarding the fundamental thermodynamic limitations on clocks, accounting for the energy required to measure the clock Micadei2013pre () and any effect of correlations between the clock and the thermal machine Malabarba2015njp (); MischaInPrep (). This intriguing problem will be tackled in future publications.

## Vi Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge edifying conversations with Nikolai Kiesel, Alexander Kubanek, Joseph Randall, Johannes Roßnagel, Kilian Singer, Raam Uzdin and Mihai Vidrighin. MTM and MPW were financed by EPSRC. MH acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (AMBIZIONE PZ00P2161351) and the MINECO project FIS2013-40627-P, with the support of FEDER funds, and by the Generalitat de Catalunya CIRIT, project 2014-SGR-966. JP was supported by Ministerío de Economía y Competitividad Project No. FIS2015-69512-R and the Fundación Séneca Project No. 19882/GERM/15. MBP was supported by an Alexander von Humboldt Professorship, the ERC Synergy grant BioQ and the EU STREP EQUAM.

## References

- [1] R. Kosloff and A. Levy. Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 65(1):365–393, 2014.
- [2] J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk. The role of quantum information in thermodynamics — a topical review. J. Phys. A, 49(14):143001, 2016.
- [3] M. Campisi, P. Hänggi, and P. Talkner. Colloquium : Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:771–791, 2011.
- [4] M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim. Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics. Nat. Commun., 4:2059, 2013.
- [5] P. Skrzypczyk, A. J. Short, and S. Popescu. Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems. Nat. Commun., 5:4185, 2014.
- [6] S. F. Huelga and M. B. Plenio. Vibrations, quanta and biology. Cont. Phys., 54(4):181–207, 2013.
- [7] N. Killoran, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio. Enhancing light-harvesting power with coherent vibrational interactions: A quantum heat engine picture. J. Chem. Phys., 143(15):155102, 2015.
- [8] N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk. How small can thermal machines be? The smallest possible refrigerator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:130401, 2010.
- [9] A. Levy and R. Kosloff. Quantum absorption refrigerator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:070604, 2012.
- [10] A. Levy, R. Alicki, and R. Kosloff. Quantum refrigerators and the third law of thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 85:061126, 2012.
- [11] D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky and G. Kurizki. Heat-machine control by quantum-state preparation: From quantum engines to refrigerators. Phys. Rev. E, 90:022102, 2014.
- [12] L. A. Correa. Multistage quantum absorption heat pumps. Phys. Rev. E, 89:042128, 2014.
- [13] R. Silva, P. Skrzypczyk, and N. Brunner. Small quantum absorption refrigerator with reversed couplings. Phys. Rev. E, 92:012136, 2015.
- [14] J. Wang, Y. Lai, Z. Ye, J. He, Y. Ma, and Q. Liao. Four-level refrigerator driven by photons. Phys. Rev. E, 91:050102, 2015.
- [15] B. Leggio, B. Bellomo, and M. Antezza. Quantum thermal machines with single nonequilibrium environments. Phys. Rev. A, 91:012117, 2015.
- [16] P. Doyeux, B. Leggio, R. Messina, and M. Antezza. Quantum thermal machine acting on a many-body quantum system: Role of correlations in thermodynamic tasks. Phys. Rev. E, 93:022134, 2016.
- [17] N. Brunner, M. Huber, N. Linden, S. Popescu, R. Silva, and P. Skrzypczyk. Entanglement enhances cooling in microscopic quantum refrigerators. Phys. Rev. E, 89(3):32115, 2014.
- [18] L. A. Correa, J. P. Palao, G. Adesso, and D. Alonso. Performance bound for quantum absorption refrigerators. Phys. Rev. E, 87:042131, 2013.
- [19] L. A. Correa, J. P. Palao, D. Alonso, and G. Adesso. Quantum-enhanced absorption refrigerators. Sci. Rep., 4:3949, 2014.
- [20] M. T. Mitchison, M. P. Woods, J. Prior, and M. Huber. Coherence-assisted single-shot cooling by quantum absorption refrigerators. New J. Phys., 17(11):115013, 2015.
- [21] J. B. Brask and N. Brunner. Small quantum absorption refrigerator in the transient regime: Time scales, enhanced cooling, and entanglement. Phys. Rev. E, 92:062101, 2015.
- [22] Y.-X. Chen and S.-W. Li. Quantum refrigerator driven by current noise. Europhys. Lett., 97(4):40003, 2012.
- [23] A. Mari and J. Eisert. Cooling by heating: Very hot thermal light can significantly cool quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:120602, 2012.
- [24] D. Venturelli, R. Fazio, and V. Giovannetti. Minimal self-contained quantum refrigeration machine based on four quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:256801, 2013.
- [25] J. Ye, D. W. Vernooy, and H. J. Kimble. Trapping of single atoms in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83:4987–4990, 1999.
- [26] J. McKeever, J. R. Buck, A. D. Boozer, A. Kuzmich, H.-C. Nägerl, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and H. J. Kimble. State-insensitive cooling and trapping of single atoms in an optical cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:133602, 2003.
- [27] K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble. Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom. Nature, 436(7047):87–90, 2005.
- [28] K. M. Fortier, S. Y. Kim, M. J. Gibbons, P. Ahmadi, and M. S. Chapman. Deterministic loading of individual atoms to a high-finesse optical cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:233601, 2007.
- [29] C. Russo, H. G. Barros, A. Stute, F. Dubin, E. S. Phillips, T. Monz, T. E. Northup, C. Becher, T. Salzburger, H. Ritsch, P. O. Schmidt, and R. Blatt. Raman spectroscopy of a single ion coupled to a high-finesse cavity. App. Phys. B, 95(2):205–212, 2009.
- [30] J. D. Sterk, L. Luo, T. A. Manning, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe. Photon collection from a trapped ion-cavity system. Phys. Rev. A, 85:062308, 2012.
- [31] A. Stute, B. Casabone, B. Brandstätter, D. Habicher, H. G. Barros, P. O. Schmidt, T. E. Northup, and R. Blatt. Toward an ion-photon quantum interface in an optical cavity. App. Phys. B, 107(4):1145–1157, 2012.
- [32] O. Abah, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob, S. Deffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz. Single-ion heat engine at maximum power. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:203006, 2012.
- [33] P. Horak, G. Hechenblaikner, K. M. Gheri, H. Stecher, and H. Ritsch. Cavity-induced atom cooling in the strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79:4974–4977, 1997.
- [34] P. Maunz, T. Puppe, I. Schuster, N. Syassen, P. W. H. Pinkse, and G. Rempe. Cavity cooling of a single atom. Nature, 428(6978):50–52, 2004.
- [35] S. Nuszmann, K. Murr, M. Hijlkema, B. Weber, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe. Vacuum-stimulated cooling of single atoms in three dimensions. Nat. Phys., 1(2):122–125, 2005.
- [36] D. R. Leibrandt, J. Labaziewicz, V. Vuletić, and I. L. Chuang. Cavity sideband cooling of a single trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:103001, 2009.
- [37] N. Brunner, N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk. Virtual qubits, virtual temperatures, and the foundations of thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 85:051117, 2012.
- [38] E. D. Black. An introduction to Pound-Drever-Hall laser frequency stabilization. Am. J. Phys., 69(1):79–87, 2001.
- [39] M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga. Entangled light from white noise. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:197901, 2002.
- [40] C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller. Quantum Noise. Springer, 3rd edition, 2004.
- [41] H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 1st edition, 2007.
- [42] N. G. Van Kampen. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Elsevier, 3rd edition, 2007.
- [43] Á. Rivas, A. D. K. Plato, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio. Markovian master equations: A critical study. New J. Phys., 12(11):113032, 2010.
- [44] P. F. Herskind, A. Dantan, J. P. Marler, M. Albert, and M. Drewsen. Realization of collective strong coupling with ion Coulomb crystals in an optical cavity. Nat. Phys., 5(7):494–498, 2009.
- [45] M. Albert, J. P. Marler, P. F. Herskind, A. Dantan, and M. Drewsen. Collective strong coupling between ion Coulomb crystals and an optical cavity field: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. A, 85:023818, 2012.
- [46] A. Bermudez, M. Bruderer, and M. B. Plenio. Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:040601, 2013.
- [47] K. Brandner, M. Bauer, M. T. Schmid, and U. Seifert. Coherence-enhanced efficiency of feedback-driven quantum engines. New J. Phys., 17(6):065006, 2015.
- [48] M. D. Vidrighin, O. Dahlsten, M. Barbieri, M. S. Kim, V. Vedral, and I. A. Walmsley. Photonic Maxwell’s demon. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:050401, 2016.
- [49] K. W. Murch, U. Vool, D. Zhou, S. J. Weber, S. M. Girvin, and I. Siddiqi. Cavity-assisted quantum bath engineering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:183602, 2012.
- [50] C. J. Myatt, B. E. King, Q. A. Turchette, C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland. Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs. Nature, 403(6767):269–273, 2000.
- [51] K. Zhang, F. Bariani, and P. Meystre. Quantum optomechanical heat engine. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:150602, 2014.
- [52] K. Micadei, R. M. Serra, and L. C. Céleri. Thermodynamic cost of acquiring information. Phys. Rev. E, 88:062123, 2013.
- [53] A. S. L. Malabarba, A. J. Short, and P. Kammerlander. Clock-driven quantum thermal engines. New J. Phys., 17(4):045027, 2015.
- [54] R. Silva, M. P. Woods, and J. Oppenheim. In preparation.

## Appendix A Projection onto the electronic ground state

In this appendix we explain how to perturbatively eliminate the excited electronic state from the equations of motion. Our approach closely follows the treatment of Refs. [41, 43]; similar analyses can also be found in Refs. [40, 42]. Although much of the following is textbook material, an additional complication is introduced by the dissipative coupling between the motional and electronic degrees of freedom due to momentum recoil from spontaneously emitted photons. We therefore present each step of the derivation in detail.

Our starting point is the master equation describing the motional, cavity, and electronic degrees of freedom, which can be written as

(43) |

The objective is to trace over the electronic variables, leaving an effective master equation describing the density matrix of the remaining degrees of freedom. We write the local Hamiltonian as , where

(44) | ||||

(45) |

The interaction in the Lamb-Dicke and rotating-wave approximations is

(46) |

We use the following symbols to denote commutation superoperators:

(47) |

The Liouvillian can be decomposed into three contributions as , with and . In the following we set in (see Eq. (III.2)), which is an excellent approximation for optical frequencies at room temperature.

We now introduce a projector onto the electronic ground state , and its orthogonal complement . We assume that the electron is in its ground state at , and uncorrelated with , which implies that . Now we move to a dissipation picture defined by

(48) |

(49) |

It is important to note that the action of the superoperators , and is not associative: they are defined to operate on everything that appears to their right. We also note the useful identities

(50) | ||||

(51) | ||||

(52) | ||||

(53) |

These expressions can be proved by considering their action on a general quantum state.

In terms of their typical eigenvalues, we have that . This allows us to perturbatively eliminate the irrelevant part of the density operator . In order to do this, we write the master equation in the dissipation picture as

(54) |

and insert the identity on both sides, finding

(55) | ||||

(56) |

where Eqs. (51) and (52) have been used. Eq. (56) can be formally solved by introducing the propagator

(57) |

where the symbol denotes the usual time ordering. The solution for is

(58) |

and the first term on the RHS vanishes for our choice of initial conditions. Substituting the solution Eq. (58) into Eq. (55), we obtain an exact evolution equation for :

(59) |

At this stage we approximate Eq. (59) by expanding the RHS up to second order in the small quantities and , which yields

(60) |

where we have used Eq. (53). We also note that

(61) |

assuming that the angular emission distribution is symmetric, , which holds true for spontaneous emission in an isotropic environment. We assume that is on the same order as and , which is the case deep in the Lamb-Dicke regime . To second order in small quantities, it is therefore sufficient to retain only the leading-order contribution in evaluating the second term on the RHS of Eq. (60).

We now invoke the Markov approximation by extending the lower integration limit to and making the replacement . These steps are justified because the memory kernel decays rapidly to zero. In particular, this decay is approximately exponential in time with decay constant , which is much shorter than the characteristic time scales of the reduced system dynamics. After a change of variables to , we obtain the Markovian master equation

(62) |

To evaluate this expression explicitly, is convenient to introduce a decomposition of the interaction Hamiltonian as

(63) |

where the sum over in Eq. (63) runs over all Bohr frequencies of , while the are lowering operators for these frequencies, i.e.

(64) |

and the operators act only on the electronic degrees of freedom. Substituting Eq. (63) into Eq. (62) and tracing over the electronic variables, we obtain

(65) |

where , and we defined the spectral correlation matrix

(66) |

Here, where and its adjoint is defined by . The correlation functions can be decomposed as

(67) | ||||

(68) |

The final step is the rotating wave approximation, in which rapidly oscillating contributions with are neglected. Transforming back to the Schrödinger picture yields the Lindblad master equation

(69) |

with

(70) |

The master equation is then placed into Lindblad form by diagonalising the matrices [41].

The non-vanishing components of the spectral correlation matrix are proportional to

(71) |

The Lamb-shift Hamiltonian is given as , where

(72) |

(73) |

We also find the following incoherent contributions associated with spontaneous emission from the excited state: