Rare FCNC radiative leptonic decays B\to\gamma\ell^{+}\ell^{-}

Rare FCNC radiative leptonic decays

   Anastasiia Kozachuk and Nikolai Nikitin
Institute for High Energy Physics
   Austrian Academy of Sciences    Nikolsdorfergasse 18    A-1050 Vienna    Austria
D. V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
   M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University    119991    Moscow    Russia
Faculty of Physics
   University of Vienna    Boltzmanngasse 5    A-1090 Vienna    Austria
Faculty of Physics
   M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University    119991 Moscow    Russia
E-mail:
dmitri_melikhov@gmx.de
   anastasiia.kozachuk@cern.ch    Nikolai.Nikitine@cern.ch
Abstract

We present our recent results [1] for long-distance QCD effects in the flavour-changing neutral current radiative leptonic decays , . One encounters here two distinct types of long-distance effects: those encoded in the transition form factors induced by the quark currents, and those related to the charm-loop effects.

We calculate the form factors in a broad range of the momentum transfers making use of the relativisitc dispersion approach based on the constituent quark picture which has proven to provide reliable predictions for many weak-transition form factors.

Concerning the description of the charm-loop contributions, we point out two observations: First, the precise description of the charmonium resonances, in particular, the relative phases between and , has impact on the differential distributions and on the forward-backward asymmetry, , in a broad range of GeV. Second, the shape of in and in ( the vector meson) in the -region between and provides an unambiguous probe of the relative phases between and . Fixing the latter will lead to a strong reduction of the theoretical uncertainties in at GeV where it has the sensitivity to physics beyond the SM.

\ShortTitle

FCNC radiative leptonic -decays \FullConferenceEPS-HEP 2017, European Physical Society conference on High Energy Physics
5-12 July 2017
Venice, Italy

1 Motivation

Rare () transitions proceed through flavor changing neutral currents (FCNC) forbidden at tree level in the Standard Model. Because of possible contributions of new particles to the loops, the corresponding decays may be sensitive to physics beyond the Standard Model. Presently, a number of tensions between the predictions of the Standard Model and the experimental measurements in weak -decays, e.g. in and at the level of have been reported (see e.g. [2] and references therein). If these deviations are confirmed at a larger statistics, other FCNC -decays, such as rare radiative leptonic decays may provide important complementary information on deviations from the SM. Our analysis [1] focuses on long-distance QCD effects in radiative leptonic -decays which have a rich and a complicated structure. In this report we present some of the essential results from [1].

2 Theoretical basics

The FCNC transitions are described by the effective Hamiltonian [3]

(1)

where is the Fermi constant, are the Wilson coefficients and are the basis operators of this expansion. The Wilson coefficients contain the short-distance effects describing the contributions of “heavy” degrees of freedom—-quarks and - and -bosons—in the loops. The operators involve the “light” degrees of freedom such as , and the light quarks, the leptons, and the photon. Whereas the heavy degrees of freedom have been integrated out, the light degrees of freedom remain dynamical and propagate in the loops.

One encounters two kinds of long-distance QCD effects in rare radiative -decays: (i) those encoded in the transition form factors of the basis operators in (1) and (ii) those related to the virtual and quarks in the loops. A serious challenge is related to the theoretical description of -quark loops which lead to the appearance of the narrow charmonium resonances in the physical region of -decays.

(i) The transition form factors are defined as follows [4, 5]111Our notations and conventions are: , , , , .:

(2)

The form factors are functions of two variables, and , where the momentum is emitted from the weak transition current, whereas the momentum is emitted by one of the valence quarks of the -meson.

There are two distinct types of form factors necessary for the description of the . Fig. 1 shows diagrams describing amplitudes of the first type: the real photon is emitted by the valence quarks of the -meson, whereas the virtual photon is emiited from the weak-transition vertex. These amplitudes correspond to and . An essential feature of the form factors is the absence of hadron singularites in the physical region of the radiative decay . The properties of the corresponding form factors have been discussed in [4] where a realistic parametrization of these form factors have been proposed. This form-factor model has been applied to the description of decays in [5]. In [6], the form factors have been studied in more detail, making use of the relativistic dispersion approach based on the constituent quark picture [7], which proved to provide a reliable description of a large class of weak-transition form factors [8]. The spectral representations for in terms of the -meson wave function were derived and reliable numerical estimates were obtained. Ref. [1] extends the analysis of [6]: it calculates also the form factors within the dispersion approach and provides the numerical results for these quantities.

Figure 1: Diagrams, corresponding to the case when the real photon is emitted by the valence quark of the -meson and the lepton pair is coupled to the weak effective vertex. Red blobs denote the four-fermion operators and green blobs correspond to the electromagnetic penguin operator.

Another type of contributions corresponds to the real-photon emission from the FCNC penguin, whereas the virtual photon is emitted by the valence quark (Fig. 2). These diagrams lead to the form factors . The diagram of Fig. 2(b) is easy as it does not contain hadron singularities in the physical decay region: the nearest singularity in the channel lies at , i.e. far beyond the physical region. On the contrary, the diagram of Fig. 2(a) involves the light vector mesons in the physical region. For the description of this amplitude, a gauge-invariant version of vector meson dominance is used. Further details of the calculation can be found in [5].

Figure 2: Diagrams, corresponding to the case when the real photon is emitted from the effective weak vertex, while the virtual one is emitted from the valence quark of the -meson

3 Charming loops

A serious problem is posed by the contributions of four-quark operators from the effective Hamiltonian, which generate the - and the -quark loops. Crucial is the contribution of the charm loops as the narrow charmonium states appear in the physical decay region.

In the factorization approximation (i.e. neglecting gluon exchanges between the -meson valence-quark loop and the -quark loop attached to the photon) the contribtions of a vector charmonium state may be unambiguously calculated [9, 10]: the contribution of any vector resonance is positive-defined and is given via its decay constant . However, as is well-known, the factorization approximation leads to the and amplitudes strongly underestimating the known rates. Therefore, nonfactorizable gluons yield the dominant contribution, at least in the regions near and . In [11], the nonfactorizable gluon exchanges have been calculated at ; it was then concluded that the extrapolation to larger of the full amplitude—the sum of factorizable and nonfactorizable contributions—suggests an opposite sign of the and contributions to the amplitude, such that the full contribution is negative. Because of the similarities between the amplitudes of the processes with the neutral vector meson and the photon in the final state, the same pattern of the and contributions in would be a reasonable assumption.

Since the conclusion about the opposite-sign phases of and is based on the extrapolation, it would be useful to have also alternative checks of this statement. The LHCb collaboration studied the relative phase between the and in the decays and reported that the similar-phase and the opposite-phase cases cannot be discriminated using the available data [12].

We therefore consider two different possibilites: the same-phase and the opposite-phase and contributions.222We emphasize that after nonfactrizable gluon exchanges are taken into account, the pattern of the and contributions in and in decays may well differ from each other. We will show that the behaviour of the forward-backward asymmetry in and in decays in the -range between and provides an unambiguos probe of the relative phases of these vector charmonia contributions.

Figure 3: The differential branching ratio and the forward-backward asymmetry for in the range GeV. Blue line - the description of and from [9]; orange line - the description from [9] with the phase reversed; green line - the description of and from [11].

4 Numerical Results

We now present our numerical results for . Fig. 3 shows the differential distributions in decays for three different ways of describing the and contributions. In the region GeV, where the asymmetry has a zero point, the distributions are sensitive to the details of the description of charmonia contributions.

Fig. 4 gives in a broad range of , including the charmonia region. Obviously, the shape of in the region between and is particularly sensitive to the relative sign between these states.

Table 1 summarizes our numerical predictions for the branching ratios. We present the branching ratios integrated over two different regions: over the range , which does not include any resonance, and over the whole range of the invariant mass of the lepton pair. In the latter case we include the contributions of the light vector mesons and the vector charmonia using a simple Breit-Wigner formula [9].

Figure 4: Forward-backward asymmetries for . Blue line - the description of and from [9]; orange line - the description from [9] with the phase reversed.
-range Full
Table 1: Our results for the branching ratios of decays for different ranges of : for and for the full range. The value of the photon energy cut is

5 Conclusion

We presented the outcomes of our resent study of decays in the SM. The emphasis of our analysis was laid on the long-range QCD contributions to the amplitude. It should be emphasized that radiative leptonic decays have a more complicated structure of long-distance effects compared to rare FCNC semileptonic decays.

Our main findings may be summarized as follows:

1. We obtained predictions for the tranition form factors within the relativistic dispersion approach based on the constituent quark picture. Our numerical estimates correspond to the parameters of the meson wave functions updated according to the latest values of the decay constants of pseudoscalar and vector mesons. Comparison with the available results from other approaches suggest the accuracy of our predictions at the level of about 10%.

2. We studied in detail long-distance effects related to charm loops. Making use of different prescriptions of the and phases, we observed a sizeable sensitivity of the differential distributions and the forward-backward asymmetry in the region GeV to the sign of the contribution to the amplitude. We point out that the experimental measurement of the shape of in or in decays in the -region between and provides a clean probe of the relative and phases. As soon as the latter are fixed, the forward-backward asymmetry in the region of GeV, where it has a sensitiity to the extentions of the SM, may be reliably calculated and used for the search of the new physics effects.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Diego Guadagnoli for numerous useful discussions. D. M. acknowledges support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under project P29028; A. K. and N. N. were supported by the Russian Science Fund under grant 16-12-10280.

References

  • [1] A. Kozachuk, D. Melikhov and N. Nikitin, in preparation.
  • [2] D. Guadagnoli, D. Melikhov and M. Reboud, Phys. Lett. B 760, 442 (2016).
  • [3] B. Grinstein, M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B 319, 271 (1989).
  • [4] F. Kruger and D. Melikhov, Phys. Rev. D 67, 034002 (2003).
  • [5] D. Melikhov and N. Nikitin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114028 (2004).
  • [6] A. Kozachuk, D. Melikhov and N. Nikitin, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014015 (2016).
  • [7] D. Melikhov, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2460 (1996); Phys. Rev. D 56, 7089 (1997).
  • [8] D. Melikhov and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014006 (2000); D. Melikhov, EPJ direct, 4, 1 (2002).
  • [9] A. Ali, T. Mannel and T. Morozumi, Phys. Lett. B 273, 505 (1991) .
  • [10] F. Kruger and L. Sehgal, Phys.  Lett. B 380, 199 (1996).
  • [11] A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. Pivovarov, Y.-M. Wang, JHEP1009 089 (2010).
  • [12] LHCb Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 161 (2017).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
164980
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description