Quasiparticle dynamics and spin-orbital texture of the SrTiO{}_{3} two-dimensional electron gas

Quasiparticle dynamics and spin-orbital texture of the SrTiO two-dimensional electron gas


Two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) in SrTiO have become model systems for engineering emergent behaviour in complex transition metal oxides. Understanding the collective interactions that enable this, however, has thus far proved elusive. Here we demonstrate that angle-resolved photoemission can directly image the quasiparticle dynamics of the -electron subband ladder of this complex-oxide 2DEG. Combined with realistic tight-binding supercell calculations, we uncover how quantum confinement and inversion symmetry breaking collectively tune the delicate interplay of charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom in this system. We reveal how they lead to pronounced orbital ordering, mediate an orbitally-enhanced Rashba splitting with complex subband-dependent spin-orbital textures and markedly change the character of electron-phonon coupling, co-operatively shaping the low-energy electronic structure of the 2DEG. Our results allow for a unified understanding of spectroscopic and transport measurements across different classes of SrTiO-based 2DEGs, and yield new microscopic insights on their functional properties.

Figure 1: Orbital ordering of a two-dimensional electron gas in SrTiO. (a) vs.  dispersion from ARPES ( eV, measured along the direction), revealing a multi-orbital subband structure comprising co-existing ladders of light and massive -electron subband states. The respective circular and faint elliptical Fermi surface pockets (measured with  eV and the polarization along ) are shown in the inset. For the dispersion plot, a normalisation (division by the average MDC) has been applied to better reveal the massive band, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. (b) This electronic structure is well described by a self-consistent tight-binding supercell calculation. The spatial dependence of the subband wavefunctions along the confinement direction, , reveal a pronounced real-space orbital ordering, a direct consequence of near-surface band bending (c).

The ubiquitous perovskite oxide SrTiO, a wide-gap band insulator, hosts varied bulk properties including quantum paraelectricity, dilute doping-induced superconductivity and high thermoelectric coefficients. These reflect a subtle competition between interactions of the underlying quantum many-body system. Intriguingly, thermodynamic and transport measurements 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6 indicate that the balance of these interactions can be tuned to engineer striking emergent properties when quantum confinement and doping are combined to create a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG). 1; 2; 7 A diverse and attractive array of properties have been uncovered to date in this system, including gate-tuned superconductivity, 3; 4; 9 its coexistence with ferromagnetism, 5; 6 and enhanced Seebeck coefficients, 10 establishing SrTiO based 2DEGs as a model platform for use in future multifunctional electronic devices. 1

They are most commonly realised at a polar interface to another band insulator LaAlO, creating a narrow conducting channel that resides solely within the SrTiO8 Similar 2DEGs can also be created by interfacing SrTiO to a wide array of other band or Mott insulators including NdAlO11 LaTiO12 and GdTiO13 by chemical doping of electrons into narrow SrTiO channels, 14; 15 analogous to -doping of semiconductors such as Si, and by field-effect doping in a transistor-style configuration. 9 Moreover, the recent discovery of a 2DEG formed at the free surface of a bulk SrTiO crystal opens new avenues for its advanced spectroscopic investigation. 7; 16

Exploiting this, here we present unified angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) measurements and tight-binding supercell calculations revealing new richness of the electronic structure of this model oxide 2DEG. We show how a pronounced orbital ordering mediates an unconventional spin splitting, giving rise to strongly anisotropic and subband-dependent canted spin-orbital textures. The orbitally enhanced Rashba effect explains the pronounced spin splittings previously inferred from magnetotransport in this system, while simultaneously revealing a breakdown of the conventional picture used to describe these. We uncover how this complex ladder of subband states are further renormalized by many-body interactions. This reconciles previous discrepancies between effective masses estimated from ARPES and quantum oscillations, unifying the properties of surface and interface SrTiO 2DEGs, and reveals a strikingly different nature of electron-phonon coupling compared to bulk SrTiO.

Orbital ordering.
Figure 1 summarises the generic electronic structure of SrTiO 2DEGs, as revealed by ARPES from a SrTiO(100) surface with saturated band bending. 7 Consistent with previous reports from both surface and interface 2DEGs, 7; 16; 17; 18; 19 we find a broad bandwidth that extends up to  meV below the Fermi level. Here, we can resolve a ladder of at least three light subband states that contribute concentric circular Fermi surface sheets, co-existing with just a single heavy electron band () that has a much shallower binding energy of less than  meV and gives rise to elliptical Fermi surfaces oriented along . From this Fermi surface topology together with the polarization dependence of our measured intensities (Supplementary Fig. 2), we assign not only the lowest, 16 but rather the whole ladder of observed light states as having dominantly orbital character, while the heavy states derive from orbitals. This immediately indicates a strong breaking of the orbital degeneracy that is present in the bulk electronic structure of SrTiO20 driving a pronounced orbital ordering with a polarization , which exceeds 30%, a lower limit derived from our experimentally-resolved Fermi surface areas.

This is a direct consequence of the real-space anisotropy of the orbital wavefunctions combined with inversion symmetry breaking by the electrostatic potential that defines the 2DEG by creating a steep asymmetric quantum well along the -direction (Fig. 1(c)). As shown by our self-consistent tight-binding supercell calculations (Fig. 1(b), see Methods), the resulting quantized subbands that derive from planar orbitals have wavefunctions reminiscent of the envelope functions of a semiconductor quantum well, except that in SrTiO they are much more localized in real space, almost to within a single unit cell for the lowest subband state. In contrast, the potential variation acts as a much weaker perturbation on the out-of-plane orbitals, which have much larger hopping amplitudes along the -direction. The resulting subbands sit close to the top of the potential well, leading to wavefunctions that penetrate much deeper into the bulk. This disparate spatial extent of the subband states is consistent with their relative spectral weight in our surface-sensitive ARPES measurements.

Figure 2: Orbitally-enhanced spin splitting. (a) Orbitally-resolved electronic structure of the 2DEG along the direction. Magnified views reveal a weak Rashba-type spin splitting around the band bottom, which becomes enhanced by approximately an order of magnitude at the crossings of the light and heavy subband states where the orbital character becomes strongly mixed, as quantified in (b) for the lowest subbands. (c) The calculated Fermi surface shows how similar orbital mixing and pronounced spin splittings occur at the crossings of circular - and elliptical -derived Fermi surface sheets. This gives rise to an exotic anisotropic and subband-specific coupled spin-orbital texture of the 2DEG, as evident from the magnitude (left) and direction (right) of the (d) spin, SAM, and (e) orbital, OAM, angular momenta of the four largest Fermi surface sheets. The magnitude of the SAM (OAM) is represented on a false colour scale in units of (), respectively, and is shown for additional Fermi surfaces in Supplementary Fig. 4.

Unconventional Rashba spin splitting. The same breaking of inversion symmetry that drives this orbital ordering can additionally lift the spin degeneracy through a Bychkov-Rashba-type spin-orbit interaction. 21; 22; 23 Focussing near the band bottom of the lowest band (Fig. 2(a,b)), we indeed find a small characteristic splitting between the calculated energy of spin-up and spin-down states, , with a Rashba parameter,  eVÅ. The non-negligible splitting found here, despite the modest spin-orbit interaction in 3 transition metals, is indicative of the very strong electric field gradient of the confining potential. From our self-consistent band bending potential calculation (Fig. 1(c)), we estimate that this exceeds  Vm within the first 2 unit cells where the lowest subband state is confined. For the more delocalized second subband, whose wavefunction extends into regions of shallower band bending, we find a slightly smaller Rashba parameter  eVÅ, confirming that the strength of this spin splitting is controlled by the confining electric field. This should therefore be directly tuneable by electrical gating, suggesting a potential route towards spintronic control in oxides.

Unlike typical Rashba systems such as the Au surface, however, here the interplay between orbital ordering and spin-orbit coupling leads to a significantly richer spin structure of the 2DEG states. Close to the crossings of the light and heavy subbands, the spin splitting increases by approximately an order of magnitude, concomitant with a strong mixing of their orbital character (Fig. 2(a-c)). This rationalises an increased spin splitting reported from transport when the subbands become populated in electrically-gated SrTiO/LaAlO interface 2DEGs. 24 Moreover, the crossover from -linear to strongly enhanced spin splitting that we find here readily explains the approximately dependence of the splitting that has been reported. 25 Our layer-projected calculations indicate that the subband wavefunctions become more delocalized in the -direction close to these band crossings, a natural consequence of the stronger overlap of neighbouring orbitals along (Supplementary Fig. 3). This delocalization would naively be expected to reduce the strength of the Rashba effect. In contrast, its significant enhancement here points to a dominant role of inter-orbital hopping in driving such surprisingly-large spin splittings. Similar enhancements have recently also been observed in other calculations, mainly based on model 3-band Hamiltonians, 26; 27; 28 which are qualitatively entirely consistent with our results. Our calculations demonstrate how this is a direct consequence of orbital ordering in the real experimentally-confirmed multi-subband structure of the SrTiO 2DEG.

Moreover, as shown in Fig. 2(d,e), they reveal an exotic coupled spin-orbital texture of the resulting 2DEG Fermi surfaces. While an approximately perpendicular spin-momentum locking ensures tangential spin winding around the circular sections of Fermi surface, it leads to spins aligned almost perpendicular to the Fermi surface for large sections of the extremely anisotropic () sheets. Around the crossings of and states, the spins of neighbouring Fermi surfaces align (anti-)parallel with a ordering, ensuring maximal hybridization gaps are opened. At the same time, rather than being quenched to zero as might have naively been expected, we find a finite orbital angular momentum (OAM, ) emerges. This is relatively small () for the isolated and sections of Fermi surface (Fig. 2(e) and Supplementary Fig. 3), but grows as large as around the band crossings. Moreover, we find that the OAM is oriented either parallel or antiparallel to the corresponding spin angular momentum (SAM, ), and so this increase in OAM maximally enhances , by a factor of , at and in the vicinity of the hybridization gaps, comparable to the corresponding increase in spin splitting (Fig. 2(b)).

This therefore provides a natural basis to understand the large spin splittings inferred from magnetotransport, 29; 30; 31 despite the small atomic spin-orbit interaction of SrTiO, in terms of an orbital Rashba effect. 32; 33 For isolated sections of Fermi surface, we find that the OAM of the inner and outer spin-split branches have the same helicity, consistent with a weak spin-orbit coupling limit. 33 For the sections of Fermi surface, however, the inner and outer branches have opposite OAM, reflecting additional richness as compared to model systems such as noble metal surface states. 33 This causes mixed helicities of the OAM around the inner branch of each Fermi surface sheet, as compared to a complete winding for the outer branches (see arrows in Supplementary Fig. 4). Importantly, we find that the dominant inter-band interactions cause the winding direction of both the OAM and SAM of the outer -derived Fermi surfaces to abruptly switch sign across the hybridization gaps. For several inner Fermi surfaces whose orbital character is strongly mixed, continuously evolving between - and -like around the Fermi surface (Fig. 2(c)), this leads to strongly frustrated spin and orbital textures, rapidly canting from tangential to radial alignment as a function of Fermi surface angle (Fig. 2(d,e)). This is quite distinct from the functional form of conventional Rashba splitting 21 and provides strong constraints for the influence of spin-splitting on magnetism 34 and superconductivity. 35

Figure 3: Quasiparticle dynamics of the subband states. (a) ARPES measurements along the direction ( eV), together with the peak positions of fits to MDCs and EDCs (black dots) and a cosine ‘bare band’ dispersion (blue line). The data reveal pronounced signatures of electron-phonon coupling. Particularly apparent is a low-energy kink in the dispersion at  meV, shown magnified inset. (b) Real, , and imaginary, , parts of the extracted self-energy. The open blue symbols show before subtraction of an electron-electron scattering contribution to the total measured imaginary part of the self-energy, approximated here by the expression for a 2D Fermi liquid (dashed line,  eV,  eV). The solid lines are calculated electron-phonon self energies with the Eliashberg function proportional to the full phonon density of states (red/blue) or for coupling to three longitudinal optical phonons (black), which dominate the interaction in lightly doped bulk SrTiO. (c, left) Calculated electron-phonon spectral function, , along the direction (see Methods). This reveals complete bandwidth renormalization of the heavy states (particularly apparent when is projected only onto orbitals as shown in the right inset), and kinks in the light subband dispersions at their crossings with this renormalized heavy state (left inset), both in good agreement with our experimental measurements, shown in the right half using curvature analysis 36 of the raw data.

Many-body interactions. In Figure 3, we further uncover a pronounced role of electron-phonon interactions on this complex hierarchy of electronic states. Unlike in bulk-doped SrTiO, where the Fermi energy is typically only a few meV and the electron-phonon interaction is thus non-retarded, the occupied widths of different subbands of the 2DEG range from almost zero up to values greater than the highest phonon frequency of  meV. This is an unusual situation, neither described by the adiabatic nor the anti-adiabatic approximation, and points to a complex influence of electron-phonon coupling in this system. We extract the corresponding self-energy, , from our ARPES measurements of the lowest subband along the direction (see methods), where we resolve an isolated band all the way up to . The slope of at the Fermi level yields an electron-phonon coupling strength of , while its broad maximum between  meV is indicative of coupling to multiple modes. Indeed, the experimentally-determined self-energy is in excellent agreement with a calculation within Eliashberg theory that assumes a coupling function proportional to the entire phonon density of states associated with the motion of oxygen and Ti ions 37 and includes the realistic 2DEG electron density of states from our tight-binding calculation.

Together with a moderate correlation-induced mass enhancement of that we estimate from a Kramers-Kronig transform of a Fermi-liquid contribution to the imaginary part of the self-energy, our analysis suggests an overall mass enhancement arising from many-body interactions of , close to the values deduced for lightly-doped bulk SrTiO from measurements of the electronic specific heat 38 and optical spectroscopy 39. The nature of the electron-phonon coupling, however, is very different. In lightly-doped bulk SrTiO, it is dominated by the long-range coupling to longitudinal optical (LO) phonons as described by the Fröhlich model. 40; 39 This model predicts much weaker coupling to low-energy modes than observed here, but a significantly stronger coupling to the highest LO phonon at 100 meV, as evident from a calculation employing coupling strengths from bulk SrTiO40; 41 which yield an electron-phonon self-energy in clear contrast to our experimental findings (Fig. 3(b)).

The electric field that confines the 2DEG is known to dramatically reduce its dielectric constant. 42; 7 This, together with higher carrier densities as compared to bulk SrTiO, will lead to shorter electronic screening lengths for the 2DEG, explaining the observed suppression of long-range coupling to LO modes. The enhanced coupling to low-energy phonons for the 2DEG instead leads to a pronounced kink in the dispersion of the subbands at an energy around  meV. We resolve these along both the and directions for the first two subbands. Crucially, the resulting enhanced quasiparticle mass, which we estimate as  m from our measured Fermi velocities, rectifies the discrepancy between the light masses around 0.6 m reported in earlier ARPES studies of SrTiO surface 2DEGs 7; 16 and recent quantum oscillation experiments that revealed effective masses typically around 43; 44

Intriguingly, along the kink energy coincides almost exactly with the crossing of the light and heavy subband states. This behaviour is well captured by our spectral function simulations calculated from our tight-binding bare dispersions and electron-phonon self-energy. These illustrate a very different effect of electron-phonon interactions on the heavy compared to the light subbands of the 2DEG, the former coupling to phonons with frequencies ranging from below to above the bare band width. Our calculations reveal that electron-phonon coupling essentially results in an overall bandwidth renormalisation of these states, in agreement with our experimental data where we find the band bottom of the heavy state substantially above the value predicted by our model tight binding calculations.

Figure 4: Hierarchy and interplay of underlying degrees of freedom. In the formation of the 2DEG, quantum confinement reconstructs the bulk electronic structure into a rich array of intersecting orbitally-ordered subband states. The interplay of this with spin-orbit coupling lifts the spin degeneracy of these bands, particularly strong around their crossings, through an orbitally-enhanced Rashba-like interaction. Electron-phonon and electron-electron interactions further renormalise these spin-split dispersions, increasing the quasiparticle masses close to the Fermi level, and causing a complete bandwidth narrowing of the shallow states that pins the orbitally-ordered band crossings close to the energy of the lowest phonon mode. This, in turn, sets the energy scale for enhanced spin-orbit splittings around these crossings, strongly entangling the charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom of the 2DEG on a low energy scale (orange shading).

The combination of electron-phonon coupling with orbital ordering therefore effectively pins the crossings of the and subbands to the low-energy peak in the phonon density of states. As demonstrated above, however, we additionally find orbitally-enhanced spin-orbit splittings which become maximal around these band crossings. Our direct spectroscopic measurements, together with our theoretical calculations, therefore demonstrate how a co-operative effect of orbital ordering and electron-phonon coupling sets the relevant energy scale for dominant spin splitting in this system.

Together, this reveals an intricate hierarchy of interactions and orderings governing the low-energy electronic structure of the SrTiO 2DEG (Figure 4). Electrostatic screening in response to a surface or interface charge generates an electron accumulation layer confined to a narrow potential well. The resulting quantum size effects drive pronounced orbital ordering, creating multiple intersections of light - and heavy -derived subband states. This leads to orbital mixing and induces a significant local orbital angular momentum, which in turn permits a pronounced spin splitting to emerge, despite modest atomic spin-orbit coupling. Many-body interactions, of strikingly different form to the bulk, enhance the quasiparticle masses of these spin-split subbands, reduce their bandwidths, and renormalize the energetic locations of their intersections, thus modulating their unconventional spin splitting.

Together, this interplay strongly entangles the charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom of the SrTiO 2DEG on an energy scale  meV. This will dominate both its transport and thermodynamic properties. Already we have shown how this explains enhanced quasiparticle masses observed from quantum oscillations as well as signatures of spin splitting in magnetotransport, unifying electrical and spectroscopic measurements from surface- and interface-based SrTiO 2DEGs. More generally, it establishes how quantum size effects can dramatically manipulate the underlying electronic landscape of interacting electron liquids, setting the stage for engineering new emergent properties by dimensional confinement in transition-metal oxides.

Angle-resolved photoemission: ARPES measurements were performed at the CASIOPEE beamline of SOLEIL synchrotron, the SIS beamline of the Swiss Light Source, and beamline 10.0.1 of the Advanced light source using Scienta R4000 hemispherical electron analysers, and with base pressures below  mbar. Single crystal SrTiO commercial wafers were cleaved in situ at the measurement temperature of  K along notches defining a plane. Measurements were performed on stoichiometric transparent insulating samples as well as very lightly La-doped samples (SrLaTiO with ) to help avoid charging. 2DEGs were induced at the bare surface by exposure to intense UV synchrotron light. 7 The samples were exposed to irradiation doses  Jcm to saturate the formation of the 2DEG, and we experimentally confirmed that saturation was reached before starting any of the measurements presented here. The data shown here was measured using -polarised photons of 51 or 55 eV, except for the Fermi surface maps shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 that used 43 eV - and -polarised light. All measurements were performed in the second Brillouin zone.
Self-energy determination: To determine the electron-phonon self-energy experimentally, we fit momentum distribution curves (MDCs) and energy distribution curves (EDCs) of the lowest subband measured along the direction. We chose this band as its dispersion does not intersect that of the heavy subbands up to the chemical potential along this direction (Fig. 1(b)), allowing us to perform a quantitative analysis over an extended energy range, free from complications associated with the hybridization of different subbands. The real part of the self-energy, , is given by the difference between our extracted dispersion and that of a ‘bare’ band. In order to derive a Kramers-Kronig consistent self-energy, we take the cosine bare band shown in Fig. 3(a), which includes a moderate band width renormalization due to electron correlations. We extract the imaginary part of the self energy, , where is the full width at half maximum of Lorentzian fits to MDCs, and is the bare band dispersion. This results in an imaginary part that includes a contribution from electron-electron interactions, which we approximate by the expression for a two-dimensional Fermi liquid . Subtracting this contribution with realistic parameter values of  eV and  eV from our total extracted (see Fig. 3(b)) yields the imaginary part of the electron-phonon self-energy.
Electronic structure and self-energy calculations: To calculate the subband structure, we start from a relativistic density functional theory (DFT) calculation of bulk SrTiO using the modified Becke-Johnson exchange potential and Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof correlation functional as implemented in the WIEN2K program 45. The muffin-tin radius of each atom was chosen such that its product with the maximum modulus of reciprocal vectors become . The Brillouin zone was sampled by a -mesh. We downfold this using maximally-localized Wannier functions to generate a set of bulk tight-binding transfer integrals, and then incorporate these into a 30 unit cell supercell with additional on-site potential terms to account for band bending via an electrostatic potential variation. We solve this self-consistently with Poisson’s equation, incorporating an electric field-dependent dielectric constant, 42 to yield the bare band dispersions including Rashba-type spin splitting 46 of the 2DEG. We stress that the total magnitude of the band bending is the only adjustable parameter, and yields a realistic electronic structure in good agreement with our spectroscopic measurements apart from our observed signatures of electron-phonon interactions which are not included at the level of DFT. To incorporate these, we calculate the self-energy in an Eliashberg model,

where is the bare electronic density of states determined from our tight binding calculations and and are the Fermi and Bose occupation factors. For the coupling function we use two different models. The blue line in Fig. 3(b) assumes proportional to the entire O- and Ti-derived phonon density of states from Ref. 37, while the black line is a calculation for the coupling strengths given in Refs. 40; 41 for the three longitudinal optical phonons that were found to dominate the electron-phonon interaction in lightly doped bulk samples. We then calculate the spectral function

where the bare band dispersion is taken from our tight-binding calculation. To better compare with our experimental data in Fig. 3(c), we project this onto different atomic orbitals, and include contributions from and but not orbitals to account for transition matrix elements in our experimental geometry. We additionally project the calculation onto different layers of our supercell, and incorporate an exponential attenuation of signal with depth below the surface in photoemission, assuming an inelastic mean free path of 5 Å, into our simulation. Finally, we convolve the simulated spectral function with a 2D Gaussian to account for an experimental energy and momentum resolution of 0.01 eV and 0.015 Å, respectively.

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the U.K. EPSRC (EP/I031014/1), the ERC (207901), the SNSF (200021-146995), the Scottish Funding Council, The Thailand Research Fund (RSA5680052), Office of the Higher Education Commission, Suranaree Univerisity of Technology, and the Japan Society for the promotion of Science (JSPS), through the ‘Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program)’, initiated by the council for Science and Technology policy (CSTP). PDCK acknowledges support from the Royal Society through a University Research Fellowship (UF120096). We acknowledge SOLEIL (beamline CASSIOPEE), the ALS (beamline 10.0.1), and SLS (SIS beamline) for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities, and in particular N.C. Plumb, M. Radović, and M. Shi (SLS) and P. Le Fèvre, F. Bertran and A. Taleb-Ibrahimi (SOLEIL) for technical assistance. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. We gratefully acknowledge C. Bell. C. Berthod, V. Cooper, A. Fête, H.Y. Hwang, M. Kim, J. Mannhart, D. van der Marel, and J.-M. Triscone for useful discussions.

Author contributions: The experimental data was measured by PDCK, SMW, AT, ADLT, TE, PB, WM and FB, and analysed by PDCK, SMW, AT and FB. PDCK and MSB performed the electronic structure calculations and AT performed the electron-phonon self-energy calculations. SKM maintained the ARPES endstation at the Advanced Light Source and provided experimental support. PDCK and FB were responsible for overall project planning and direction, and wrote the manuscript with input and discussion from all co-authors.

Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figure S1: Subband structure of the SrTiO 2DEG. (a) Raw data of the spectrum shown in Fig. 1a of the main manuscript, clearly revealing three light subband states as well as weak spectral weight from a single heavy band at lower binding energy. (b) This latter feature is strongly enhanced by dividing by the average MDC intensity (shown inset).
Figure S2: Orbital character from polarisation-dependent ARPES. Fermi surface of the SrTiO 2DEG measured using (a) -, (b) -polarised, and (c) the sum of - and -polarised 43 eV photons, and normalised to the same total intensity scaling. A schematic of the electronic orbitals that should be dominant for the respective experimental geometries and the resulting Fermi surfaces are also shown, in good agreement with our assignment of dominant orbital characters of the subbands in the main text.
Figure S3: Spatial extent of the 2DEG. Layer-projected calculations of the electronic structure of the SrTiO 2DEG, integrated over (a) the full 30 unit cell (u.c.) supercell, and (b)–(g) individual or few unit cell regions, as labelled in the figure.
Figure S4: Subband-dependent canted spin and orbital textures. (a) In-plane spin texture (spin angular momentum, SAM) of the outer (top) and inner (bottom) branches of successive Fermi surface sheets, showing how the alignment of the spin direction evolves from radial- to tangential- as the orbital character changes from - to -like (see Fig. 2(c) of the main text for the orbital character), leading to frustrated spin textures for orbitally-mixed Fermi surfaces. The net winding direction is shown in the centre of each plot, and the magnitude of the SAM is shown on a false colour scale in units of . (b) Equivalent plots for the orbital angular momentum (OAM), showing similar canting and mixed windings as represented by the large and small arrows. The magnitude of the OAM is represented by a false colour scale in units of , revealing how significant OAM emerges only around the band intersections where the orbital character becomes strongly mixed, and the spin splitting is thus maximised.


  1. Mannhart, J. & Schlom, D. G. Oxide Interfaces–An Opportunity for Electronics. Science 327, 1607–1611 (2010).
  2. Hwang, H. Y. et al. Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nature Mater. 11, 103–113 (2012).
  3. Reyren, N. et al. Superconducting Interfaces Between Insulating Oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007).
  4. Caviglia, A. D. et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO/SrTiO interface ground state. Nature 456, 624–627 (2008).
  5. Bert, J. A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO/SrTiO interface. Nature Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011).
  6. Li, L., Richter, C., Mannhart, J. & Ashoori, R. C. Coexistence of magnetic order and two-dimensional superconductivity at LaAlO/SrTiO interfaces. Nature Phys. 7, 762–766 (2011).
  7. Meevasana, W. et al. Creation and control of a two-dimensional electron liquid at the bare SrTiO surface. Nature Mater. 10, 114–118 (2011).
  8. Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO/SrTiO heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).
  9. Ueno, K. et al. Electric-field-induced superconductivity in an insulator. Nature Mater. 7, 855–858 (2008).
  10. Ohta, H. et al. Giant thermoelectric Seebeck coefficient of a two-dimensional electron gas in SrTiO. Nat Mater 6, 129–134 (2007).
  11. Annadi, A. et al. Electronic correlation and strain effects at the interfaces between polar and nonpolar complex oxides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 085450 (2012).
  12. Ohtomo, A. et al. Artificial charge modulation in atomic scale perovskie titanate superlattices. Nature 419, 378–380 (2002).
  13. Moetakef, P. et al. Electrostatic carrier doping of GdTiO/SrTiO£ interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 232116 (2011).
  14. Kozuka, Y. et al. Two-dimensional normal-state quantum oscillations in a superconducting heterostructure. Nature 462, 487–490 (2009).
  15. Choi, W. S., Lee, S., Cooper, V. R. & Lee, H. N. Fractionally -Doped Oxide Superlattices for Higher Carrier Mobilities. Nano Lett. 12, 4590–4594 (2012).
  16. Santander-Syro, A. F. et al. Two-dimensional electron gas with universal subbands at the surface of SrTiO. Nature 469, 189–193 (2011).
  17. D’Angelo, M. et al. Hydrogen-Induced Surface Metallization of SrTiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 116802 (2012).
  18. Berner, G. et al. Direct -Space Mapping of the Electronic Structure in an Oxide-Oxide Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 247601 (2013).
  19. Plumb, N. C. et al. Mixed dimensionality of confined conducting electrons tied to ferroelectric surface distortion on an oxide. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1302.0708 (2013).
  20. Salluzzo, M. et al. Orbital Reconstruction and the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas at the LaAlO/SrTiO Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 166804 (2009).
  21. Bychkov, Y. A. & Rashba, E. I. Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy. JETP Lett. 39, 78–81 (1984).
  22. Grundler, D. Large Rashba Splitting in InAs Quantum Wells due to Electron Wave Function Penetration into the Barrier Layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6074–6077 (2000).
  23. King, P. D. C. et al. Large Tunable Rashba Spin Splitting of a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas in . Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 096802 (2011).
  24. Fête, A., Gariglio, S., Caviglia, A. D., Triscone, J.-M. & Gabay, M. Rashba induced magnetoconductance oscillations in the LaAlO-SrTiO heterostructure. Phys. Rev. B 86, 201105 (2012).
  25. Nakamura, H., Koga, T. & Kimura, T. Experimental Evidence of Cubic Rashba Effect in an Inversion-Symmetric Oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206601 (2012).
  26. Zhong, Z., Tóth, A. & Held, K. Theory of spin-orbit coupling at LaAlO/SrTiO interfaces and SrTiO surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 87, 161102 (2013).
  27. Khalsa, G., Lee, B. & MacDonald, A. H. Theory of t electron-gas Rashba interactions. Phys. Rev. B 88, 041302(R) (2013).
  28. Kim, Y., Lutchyn, R. M. & Nayak, C. Origin and transport signatures of spin-orbit interactions in one- and two-dimensional SrTiO3-based heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 87, 245121 (2013).
  29. Caviglia, A. D. et al. Tunable Rashba Spin-Orbit Interaction at Oxide Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126803 (2010).
  30. Ben Shalom, M., Sachs, M., Rakhmilevitch, D., Palevski, A. & Dagan, Y. Tuning Spin-Orbit Coupling and Superconductivity at the SrTiO/LaAlO Interface: A Magnetotransport Study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126802 (2010).
  31. Joshua, A., Pecker, S., Ruhman, J., Altman, E. & Ilani, S. A universal critical density underlying the physics of electrons at the LaAlOSrTiO interface. Nature Commun. 3, 1129 (2012).
  32. Park, S. R. et al. Orbital-Angular-Momentum Based Origin of Rashba-Type Surface Band Splitting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 156803 (2011).
  33. Kim, B. et al. Spin and orbital angular momentum structure of Cu(111) and Au(111) surface states. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195402 (2011).
  34. Fischer, M. H., Raghu, S. & Kim, E.-A. Spin-orbit coupling in LaAlO/SrTiO interfaces: magnetism and orbital ordering. New J. Phys. 15, 023022 (2013).
  35. Michaeli, K., Potter, A. C. & Lee, P. A. Superconducting and Ferromagnetic Phases in SrTiO/LaAlO Oxide Interface Structures: Possibility of Finite Momentum Pairing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 117003 (2012).
  36. Zhang, P. et al. A precise method for visualizing dispersive features in image plots. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 043712 (2011).
  37. Choudhury, N., Walter, E. J., Kolesnikov, A. I. & Loong, C.-K. Large phonon band gap in SrTiO and the vibrational signatures of ferroelectricity in TiO perovskites: First-principles lattice dynamics and inelastic neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 77, 134111 (2008).
  38. Ambler, E., Colwell, J. H., Hosler, W. R. & Schooley, J. F. Magnetization and Critical Fields of Superconducting SrTiO. Phys. Rev. 148, 280–286 (1966).
  39. van Mechelen, J. L. M. et al. Electron-Phonon Interaction and Charge Carrier Mass Enhancement in SrTiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226403 (2008).
  40. Verbist, G., Peeters, F. M. & Devreese, J. T. Extended stability region for large bipolarons through interaction with multiple phonon branches. Ferroelectrics 130, 27–34 (1992).
  41. Meevasana, W. et al. Strong energy-momentum dispersion of phonon-dressed carriers in the lightly doped band insulator SrTiO. New J. Phys. 12, 023004 (2010).
  42. Copie, O. et al. Towards Two-Dimensional Metallic Behavior at LaAlO/SrTiO Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 216804 (2009).
  43. Caviglia, A. D. et al. Two-Dimensional Quantum Oscillations of the Conductance at LaAlO/SrTiO Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 236802 (2010).
  44. Kim, M. et al. Fermi Surface and Superconductivity in Low-Density High-Mobility -Doped SrTiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 106801 (2011).
  45. Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. Wien2k package. Available at http://www.wien2k.at.
  46. Bahramy, M. et al. Emergent quantum confinement at topological insulator surfaces. Nature Commun. 3, 1159 (2012).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description