Quantum key distribution with dissipative Kerr soliton generated by on-chip microresonators

Quantum key distribution with dissipative Kerr soliton generated by on-chip microresonators

Fang-Xiang Wang, Weiqiang Wang wwq@opt.ac.cn    Rui Niu, Xinyu Wang, Chang-Ling Zou,    Chun-Hua Dong chunhua@ustc.edu.cn    Brent E. Little, Sai T. Chu, Hang Liu, Penglei Hao, Shufeng Liu, Shuang Wang, Zhen-Qiang Yin, De-Yong He, Wenfu Zhang wfuzhang@opt.ac.cn    Wei Zhao, Zheng-Fu Han, Guang-Can Guo, Wei Chen weich@ustc.edu.cn CAS Key Lab of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China CAS Center For Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China State Key Laboratory of Cryptology, P. O. Box 5159, Beijing 100878, China Department of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Anhui Asky Quantum Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhu 241002, China 
July 20, 2019
Abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) can distribute symmetric key bits between remote legitimate users with the guarantee of quantum mechanics principles. For practical applications, the compact and robust photonic components for QKD are essential, and there are increasing attention to integrate the source, detector and modulators on a photonic chip. However, the massive and parallel QKD based on wavelength multiplexing are still challenge, due to the limited coherent light sources on the chip. Here, we introduce the Kerr dissipative soliton in a microresonator, which provides the locked coherent frequency comb with GHz frequency spacing, for QKD. We demonstrate the parallel QKD by demulplexing the coherent comb lines form the soliton, and showing the potential of Gbps secret key rate if the hundreds of channels covering C and L bands are fully exploited. The demonstrated soliton based QKD architecture are compatible with the efforts of quantum photonic integrated circuits, which are compact, robust and low-cost, and provides a competitive platform of practical QKD chip.

I Introduction

Quantum key distribution (QKD) can distribute symmetric key bits between remote legitimate users Bennett and Brassard (2014). The security of key bits are information-theoretical benefiting from their physical generating process Scarani et al. (2009); Lo et al. (2014). A lot of research works have been devoted to get higher secure key rate (SKR), longer secure transmission distance in a QKD point-to-point link Wang et al. (2012); Korzh et al. (2015); Yuan et al. (2018); Boaron et al. (2018a, b), as well as more flexible connections and higher user capacities in QKD networks Wei Chen et al. (2009); Wang et al. (2010); Sasaki et al. (2011); Wang et al. (2014). The photonic layer, which can generate, modulate and detect photon pulses at the single photon level, is the kernel of QKD. Although the clocking rate of practical QKD systems have exceeded 1 GHz and the SKR can be more than 1 Mbps at the fiber quantum channel of 50 km Tanaka et al. (2012), to increase the SKR is the most pressing task in QKD research. Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) is an effective technique to increase the SKR in an end-to-end QKD system Yoshino et al. (2012, 2013); Patel et al. (2014), or to route quantum signals in QKD networks Wang et al. (2010); Sasaki et al. (2011). The emerging achievements of integrated photonic QKD chips Sibson et al. (2017); Price et al. (2018); Bunandar et al. (2018) and single photon detector arrays Miyajima et al. (2018) exhibit the potential to integrate large-scale information transmitting and receiving units in very small scales.

The maturest light source used in current real-life QKD systems is the weak coherent source (WCS), and arrays of lasers are deployed in the scenario of using WDM. However, for a integrated QKD chip Sibson et al. (2017); Bunandar et al. (2018) for massive parallel and high speed communication, the locked laser sources are necessary but very challenging. Even for traditional off-chip QKD systems, such a source is cumbersome or costs too much. Recently, there is emerging a new research field on the frequency comb generation in microcavities Del’Haye et al. (2007); Kippenberg et al. (2011); Weiner (2017); Kippenberg et al. (2018), which provides abundant individual frequency resources in a wide bandwidth with only a single external laser pump. The dissipative Kerr soliton (DKS) soliton source Herr et al. (2014); Li et al. (2017); Kippenberg et al. (2018) can provide high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) individual optical comb lines in a wide bandwidth () covering C and L bands, with the repetition rate , which is suitable for wavelength multiplexing, and thus has the potential to replace the laser arrays with a single and compact device. Such an attractive source has already been applied in classical optical communication and indicates a Tbps communication rate by wavelength multiplexing Marin-Palomo et al. (2017).

In this work, by utilizing a DKS source on a photonic chip, we demonstrated that ultra-high-key-rate QKD systems are feasible by frequency multiplexing and demultiplexing. We verified the soliton source by two scenarios. In the first scenario, one GHz QKD system is running by using only one communication channel. In the second scenario, two GHz QKD systems are running simultaneously but independently within different communication channels. According to these two scenarios, we realized an SKR of more than kbps with one GHz QKD system in the distance of km. By considering the frequency source and the potential application in integrated optics of the soliton, QKD systems with Mbps to 1Gbps SKR is promising.

Ii Dissipative Kerr soliton

Figure1 schematically illustrates the concept of QKD networks based on the on-chip DKS source. In an integrated microring resonator, there are whispering gallery modes with almost equal frequency spacing and very high quality factor () Vahala (2004). Due to the competition between the external pump laser, cavity dissipation and the intracavity Kerr effect, the resonator could evolve into a stable soliton state that a pulse circulating in the resonator with fixed pulse shape Herr et al. (2014); Li et al. (2017); Kippenberg et al. (2018). Through the external bus waveguide, the soliton could be coupled out and serve as the laser source for the QKD experiments. In the frequency domain, the stable pulse corresponds to a comb, consisting of many coherent laser lines with equal frequency spacing. Therefore, ultra-high speed and multi-user QKD network could potentially be realized through wavelength multiplexing.

Our work uses an integrated high-index doped silica glass microresonator Wang et al. (2018a, b) for DKS frequency comb generation. By carefully designing the waveguide cross-section () of the microring resonator, a flat anomalous group velocity dispersion in communication bands is realized, which is beneficial for broadband frequency comb generation. The radius of the mciroring is , corresponding to a free spectral range of about , and the typical Q-factor of our device is about 1.7 million. By gluing the photonic integrated chip with optical fiber, the microring resonator can be efficiently excited and the DKS can be collected directly through fiber. Additionally, our device is packaged with a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) for enhancing the environmental adaptability of the DKS source Wang et al. (2018b).

The experimental setup of our integrated DKS source is shown in Fig.2(a). An external pump laser is amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and coupled to the microring resonator. Due to the ultrahigh Q-factor enhanced Kerr nonlinearity in the microring, the whispering gallery modes start to lase through the hyperparametric oscillation Del’Haye et al. (2007). By carefully tuning the relative frequency detuning of the pump laser and the microring resonance, the DKS could be realized Herr et al. (2014, 2015); Kippenberg et al. (2018). Here, we adopt the auxiliary laser assisted soliton switching method to kick the microring to the multi-soliton state Lu et al. (2018); Niu et al. (2018). Since the comb spacing of the -soliton state is -times of the FSR, we manually switch the system to the single soliton state for a full comb by annihilating the number of soliton step by step Guo et al. (2017); Lu et al. (2018). It is worth noting that, the auxiliary laser is coupled with the microring counter-propagates with respect to the soliton, and the polarization of the laser is also orthogonal with the soliton, thus the auxiliary laser are filtrated using a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and has little influence to the soliton source. The soliton comb states are stable over several hours by maintaining the comb power with frequency control of the auxiliary laser or with temperature control of the TEC.

Figure2(b) presents the spectrum of the single soliton state achieved in our experiment. The DKS exhibits a 3-dB spectral bandwidth as broad as and more than 200 comb lines with dB signal to noise ratio (SNR). The single-soliton state showing features, i.e. comb spacing are exactly equal and the spectrum envelop is very smooth, that are very attractive for communications. It already demonstrates that ultra-high speed optical communication with frequency multiplexing is feasible Marin-Palomo et al. (2017).

Iii Soliton-based wavelength multiplexing QKD

To demonstrate the feasibility of our integrated DKS source for the QKD applications, the wavelength multiplexing of the DKS was tested. The power spectra of five channels (CH1-CH5) of the demultiplexing (DEMUX) are shown in Fig.2(c). The soliton comb line interval is and the channel interval is . The power spectra cross talks of the DEMUX are shown in Fig.2(d) (from left to right: CH1 to CH5). Our experimental results indicates that the cross talk between adjacent channels is less than 20dB for all channels (CH1-CH5), and there is no cross talk between non-adjacent channels. Therefore, our DKS source promises high secret key for QKD.

The experimental setup for the proof-of-principle demonstration of the DKS-based QKD is shown in Fig.3(b). For each transmitter on Alice’s side, a demultiplexing (DEMUX), is connected to the DKS source to select a working bandwidth, as shown in Fig.2(a), the output light from different channels of the DEMUX are selected comb lines, which are actually continuous lasers. An intensity modulator (IM) (IM1 in Fig.3(b)) is used to chop the continuous light into pulses and a polarization controller (PC) is connected before IM1 to get maximum extinction ratio(ER) of light pulses. A phase modulator (PM) is cascaded to randomize the global phase of each pulses Cao et al. (2015). Then the classical random bits are phased-encoded onto the photons based on BB84 protocol with decoy state method.

The encoding processes are implemented by a Faraday-Sagnac-Michelson interferometer (FSMI), in which the Faraday mirror in its long arm is replaced by a Sagnac configuration with a modulator Wang et al. (2018c). The quantum states carried by the photons can be divided into two mutually unbiased bases (MUB) Z and X, which are defined as and , respectively. and here are the pulses passing through the short and long paths of the FMI, respectively, and the phase difference between the two pulses are randomly modulated by the PM in the Sagnac configuration with the phases of . The pluses exporting from FSMI are randomly modulated to different intensities by IM to implement decoy state method Wang (2005); Lo et al. (2005). The pulses are attenuated to the single-photon level by an attenuator (ATT) before entering the quantum channel.

After transmitting through a quantum channel of 25km length, another DEMUX is used to demultiplex different channels into corresponding QKD receivers on Bob. The structures of Receiver1 and Receiver2 are shown in Figs.3(d) and 3(e), respectively. The decoders in QKD receivers are the same FSMI unit as in the transmitter. The receiver measure the qubits either in the basis or basis by randomly modulating the PM in its decoder with the probabilities and , respectively. The decoding results are detected by single-photon detectors (SPD). The only difference between the two receivers is the number of single-photon detector (SPD). It is worth noting that although photon detection efficiency of about 3dB is sacrificed in single SPD receiver scheme, it does not weaken the security and verification of the experiments, and the less SPD number required may be valuable in massive networks.

Iv Results

Our DKS-based QKD are implemented in two different scenarios. In the first scenario, the performance of single-channel QKD are characterized. Thus, only a single communication channel of the DKS in Fig.2(a) is used to implement the QKD. In the second scenario, multi-channel QKD are demonstrated by employing two communications channels of the DKS. In this scenario, two QKD systems are running simultaneously while independently, so that cross talk between different channels can be estimated.

The QKD system utilizes one signal and two decoy states and the clock rates of the QKD system is 1GHz. The average photon number per transmitted pulse of the first QKD system TR1 (Transmitter1&Receiver1) is , and , respectively, where represents the signal state, and represent the decoy states. The corresponding values of the second system TR2 (Transmitter2&Receiver2) are , and , respectively. The sending ratio of , and is 29:2:1 for both systems.

In the first scenario, the single-channel QKD systems are verified. We run TR1 and TR2 independently within a single channel of the DEMUX in Fig.2(a). The quantum bit error rates (QBERs) of TR1 and TR2 are nd , respectively, within one hour, as shown in Figs.4(a) and 4(b). The average SKRs of TR1 and TR2 are 78.764kbps and 195.360kbps, respectively, where all time overhead including the post-processing procedure has been considered. The post-processing efficiencies of TR2 is higher than that of TR2, thus the SKR of TR2 is larger than twice of that of TR1. The one-hour real-time QBER of TR1 for signal and decoy states are shown in Fig.4(c). It shows that QBERs of all states increase little after one hour’s running and demonstrates that the system is stable for the single-channel scenario.

In the second scenario, we verified the multi-channel QKD systems. Two QKD systems are running simultaneously but independently within different channels. The experimental results show that there is no significant difference for QBER and SKR between adjacent and nonadjacent channels, as shown in Figs.4(d)-4(f). It shows that the average QBERs of the signal state are within and the SKRs are in the same level to that of the single-channel experiments. There is no significant difference between the single and multi-channel experiments. It demonstrates the performance of the first and second scenarios are well matched.

V Discussion

Increasing the SKR is an essential aim of the QKD community. Frequency multiplexing is one of the most common approach. Recently, the development of optical integrated chip makes on-chip QKD becoming a prospective branch to realize miniaturized and affordable QKD systems Sibson et al. (2017); Price et al. (2018); Bunandar et al. (2018). Another advantage of on-chip QKD is that QKD system with dense multiplexing is much easier to implement but cost much less. Intra-cavity soliton source is part of an integrated optical chip and supports dense multiplexing in the domain of frequency. More importantly, the soliton is much superior than multi-laser sources. For multi-laser source, every laser should be monitored to fit the corresponding communication channel. However, we only need to monitor the temperature of the cavity and the frequency of the pump and auxiliary lasers to make sure hundreds of frequency comb lines fit the corresponding communication channels. This work makes it possible to achieve Gbps SKR QKD system with soliton source by combining with the ultrafast on-chip modulation technology.

Vi Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the QKD based on an on-chip DKS source. Through the wavelength multiplexing, the single-channel and multi-channel QKD experiments are performed, and the experiments demonstrated a SKR exceeding by one channel. Our experiments reveal the potential of DKS-based QKD system for high SKR based on the massive and parallel communication channels. Combining with the exciting progresses achieved in the quantum photonic integrated circuits, the DKS source, high speed modulators, and high-efficiency detectors could be potentially realized on a single chip. Such a QKD chip possesses the advantages of compact, low-cost, robust and high efficiency, and will greatly promote the popularization of QKD in personal equipment and networks.

Acknowledgments

We thank Anhui Qasky Co. Ltd. for providing commercial QKD equipment and technical support. This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61627820, 61675189, 61622506, 61822115, 61475188, 61635013), the National Key Research And Development Program of China (Grant Nos.2018YFA0306400), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB24030600), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies.

References

  • Bennett and Brassard (2014) C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,” Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7 (2014).
  • Scarani et al. (2009) V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lütkenhaus,  and M. Peev, “The security of practical quantum key distribution,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301 (2009).
  • Lo et al. (2014) H.-K. Lo, M. Curty,  and K. Tamaki, “Secure quantum key distribution,” Nat. Photonics 8, 595 (2014).
  • Wang et al. (2012) S. Wang, W. Chen, J.-F. Guo, Z.-Q. Yin, H.-W. Li, Z. Zhou, G.-C. Guo,  and Z.-F. Han, “2 GHz clock quantum key distribution over 260 km of standard telecom fiber,” Opt. Lett. 37, 1008 (2012).
  • Korzh et al. (2015) B. Korzh, C. C. W. Lim, R. Houlmann, N. Gisin, M. J. Li, D. Nolan, B. Sanguinetti, R. Thew,  and H. Zbinden, “Provably secure and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fibre,” Nat. Photonics 9, 163 (2015).
  • Yuan et al. (2018) Z. Yuan, A. Plews, R. Takahashi, K. Doi, W. Tam, A. W. Sharpe, A. R. Dixon, E. Lavelle, J. F. Dynes, A. Murakami, M. Kujiraoka, M. Lucamarini, Y. Tanizawa, H. Sato,  and A. J. Shields, “10-Mb/s Quantum Key Distribution,” J. Light. Technol. 36, 3427 (2018).
  • Boaron et al. (2018a) A. Boaron, G. Boso, D. Rusca, C. Vulliez, C. Autebert, M. Caloz, M. Perrenoud, G. Gras, F. Bussières, M.-J. Li, D. Nolan, A. Martin,  and H. Zbinden, “Secure Quantum Key Distribution over 421 km of Optical Fiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 190502 (2018a).
  • Boaron et al. (2018b) A. Boaron, B. Korzh, R. Houlmann, G. Boso, D. Rusca, S. Gray, M.-J. Li, D. Nolan, A. Martin,  and H. Zbinden, “Simple 2.5 GHz time-bin quantum key distribution,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 171108 (2018b).
  • Wei Chen et al. (2009) Wei Chen, Zheng-Fu Han, Tao Zhang, Hao Wen, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Fang-Xing Xu, Qing-Lin Wu, Yun Liu, Yang Zhang, Xiao-Fan Mo, You-Zhen Gui, Guo Wei,  and Guang-Can Guo, “Field Experiment on a Star Type Metropolitan Quantum Key Distribution Network,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21, 575 (2009).
  • Wang et al. (2010) S. Wang, W. Chen, Z.-Q. Yin, Y. Zhang, T. Zhang, H.-W. Li, F.-X. Xu, Z. Zhou, Y. Yang, D.-J. Huang, L.-J. Zhang, F.-Y. Li, D. Liu, Y.-G. Wang, G.-C. Guo,  and Z.-F. Han, “Field test of wavelength-saving quantum key distribution network,” Opt. Lett. 35, 2454 (2010).
  • Sasaki et al. (2011) M. Sasaki, M. Fujiwara, H. Ishizuka, W. Klaus, K. Wakui, M. Takeoka, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, Z. Wang, A. Tanaka, K. Yoshino, Y. Nambu, S. Takahashi, A. Tajima, A. Tomita, T. Domeki, T. Hasegawa, Y. Sakai, H. Kobayashi, T. Asai, K. Shimizu, T. Tokura, T. Tsurumaru, M. Matsui, T. Honjo, K. Tamaki, H. Takesue, Y. Tokura, J. F. Dynes, A. R. Dixon, A. W. Sharpe, Z. L. Yuan, A. J. Shields, S. Uchikoga, M. Legré, S. Robyr, P. Trinkler, L. Monat, J.-B. Page, G. Ribordy, A. Poppe, A. Allacher, O. Maurhart, T. Länger, M. Peev,  and A. Zeilinger, “Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network,” Opt. Express 19, 10387 (2011).
  • Wang et al. (2014) S. Wang, W. Chen, Z.-Q. Yin, H.-W. Li, D.-Y. He, Y.-H. Li, Z. Zhou, X.-T. Song, F.-Y. Li, D. Wang, H. Chen, Y.-G. Han, J.-Z. Huang, J.-F. Guo, P.-L. Hao, M. Li, C.-M. Zhang, D. Liu, W.-Y. Liang, C.-H. Miao, P. Wu, G.-C. Guo,  and Z.-F. Han, “Field and long-term demonstration of a wide area quantum key distribution network,” Opt. Express 22, 21739 (2014).
  • Tanaka et al. (2012) A. Tanaka, M. Fujiwara, K.-i. Yoshino, S. Takahashi, Y. Nambu, A. Tomita, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, Z. Wang, M. Sasaki,  and A. Tajima, “High-Speed Quantum Key Distribution System for 1-Mbps Real-Time Key Generation,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 48, 542 (2012).
  • Yoshino et al. (2012) K.-i. Yoshino, M. Fujiwara, A. Tanaka, S. Takahashi, Y. Nambu, A. Tomita, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, Z. Wang, M. Sasaki,  and A. Tajima, “High-speed wavelength-division multiplexing quantum key distribution system,” Opt. Lett. 37, 223 (2012).
  • Yoshino et al. (2013) K.-i. Yoshino, T. Ochi, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki,  and A. Tajima, “Maintenance-free operation of WDM quantum key distribution system through a field fiber over 30 days,” Opt. Express 21, 31395 (2013).
  • Patel et al. (2014) K. A. Patel, J. F. Dynes, M. Lucamarini, I. Choi, A. W. Sharpe, Z. L. Yuan, R. V. Penty,  and A. J. Shields, “Quantum key distribution for 10 Gb/s dense wavelength division multiplexing networks,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 051123 (2014).
  • Sibson et al. (2017) P. Sibson, C. Erven, M. Godfrey, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, H. Terai, M. G. Tanner, C. M. Natarajan, R. H. Hadfield, J. L. O’Brien,  and M. G. Thompson, “Chip-based quantum key distribution,” Nat. Commun. 8, 13984 (2017).
  • Price et al. (2018) A. B. Price, P. Sibson, C. Erven, J. G. Rarity,  and M. G. Thompson, “High-Speed Quantum Key Distribution with Wavelength-Division Multiplexing on Integrated Photonic Devices,” in Conf. Lasers Electro-Optics (OSA, Washington, D.C., 2018) p. JTh2A.24.
  • Bunandar et al. (2018) D. Bunandar, A. Lentine, C. Lee, H. Cai, C. M. Long, N. Boynton, N. Martinez, C. DeRose, C. Chen, M. Grein, D. Trotter, A. Starbuck, A. Pomerene, S. Hamilton, F. N. C. Wong, R. Camacho, P. Davids, J. Urayama,  and D. Englund, “Metropolitan Quantum Key Distribution with Silicon Photonics,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 021009 (2018).
  • Miyajima et al. (2018) S. Miyajima, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, T. Yamashita,  and H. Terai, “High-time-resolved 64-channel single-flux quantum-based address encoder integrated with a multi-pixel superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,” Opt. Express 26, 29045 (2018).
  • Del’Haye et al. (2007) P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth,  and T. J. Kippenberg, “Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator.” Nature 450, 1214 (2007).
  • Kippenberg et al. (2011) T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth,  and S. a. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs.” Science 332, 555 (2011).
  • Weiner (2017) A. M. Weiner, “Frequency combs: Cavity solitons come of age,” Nat. Photonics 11, 533 (2017).
  • Kippenberg et al. (2018) T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson,  and M. L. Gorodetsky, “Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators,” Science 361, eaan8083 (2018).
  • Herr et al. (2014) T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky,  and T. J. Kippenberg, “Temporal solitons in optical microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 8, 145 (2014).
  • Li et al. (2017) Q. Li, T. C. Briles, D. A. Westly, T. E. Drake, J. R. Stone, B. R. Ilic, S. A. Diddams, S. B. Papp,  and K. Srinivasan, “Stably accessing octave-spanning microresonator frequency combs in the soliton regime,” Optica 4, 193 (2017).
  • Marin-Palomo et al. (2017) P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V. Brasch, M. H. Anderson, R. Rosenberger, K. Vijayan, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg,  and C. Koos, “Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications,” Nature 546, 274 (2017).
  • Vahala (2004) K. Vahala, Optical Microcavities, Advanced Series in Applied Physics, Vol. 5 (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2004) pp. 839–846.
  • Wang et al. (2018a) W. Wang, W. Zhang, Z. Lu, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, Q. Yang, L. Wang,  and W. Zhao, “Self-locked orthogonal polarized dual comb in a microresonator,” Photonics Res. 6, 363 (2018a).
  • Wang et al. (2018b) W. Wang, Z. Lu, W. Zhang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, L. Wang, X. Xie, M. Liu, Q. Yang, L. Wang, J. Zhao, G. Wang, Q. Sun, Y. Liu, Y. Wang,  and W. Zhao, ‘‘Robust soliton crystals in a thermally controlled microresonator,” Opt. Lett. 43, 2002 (2018b).
  • Herr et al. (2015) T. Herr, M. L. Gorodetsky,  and T. J. Kippenberg, “Dissipative Kerr Solitons in Optical Microresonators,” in Nonlinear Opt. Cavity Dyn. (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2015) pp. 129–162.
  • Lu et al. (2018) Z. Lu, W. Wang, W. Zhang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, M. Liu, L. Wang, C.-L. Zou, C.-H. Dong, B. Zhao,  and W. Zhao, “Deterministic generation and switching of dissipative Kerr soliton in a thermally controlled micro-resonator,” arXiv , 1810.04983 (2018).
  • Niu et al. (2018) R. Niu, S. Wan, S.-M. Sun, T.-G. Ma, H.-J. Chen, W.-Q. Wang, Z.-Z. Lu, W.-F. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou,  and C.-H. Dong, “Repetition rate tuning of soliton in microrod resonators,” arXiv , 1809.06490 (2018).
  • Guo et al. (2017) H. Guo, M. Karpov, E. Lucas, A. Kordts, M. Pfeiffer, V. Brasch, G. Lihachev, V. Lobanov, M. Gorodetsky,  and T. Kippenberg, ‘‘Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators,” Nat. Phys. 13, 94 (2017).
  • Cao et al. (2015) Z. Cao, Z. Zhang, H.-K. Lo,  and X. Ma, “Discrete-phase-randomized coherent state source and its application in quantum key distribution,” New J. Phys. 17, 053014 (2015).
  • Wang et al. (2018c) S. Wang, W. Chen, Z.-Q. Yin, D.-Y. He, C. Hui, P.-L. Hao, G.-J. Fan-Yuan, C. Wang, L.-J. Zhang, J. Kuang, S.-F. Liu, Z. Zhou, Y.-G. Wang, G.-C. Guo,  and Z.-F. Han, “Practical gigahertz quantum key distribution robust against channel disturbance,” Opt. Lett. 43, 2030 (2018c).
  • Wang (2005) X.-B. Wang, “Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Practical Quantum Cryptography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230503 (2005).
  • Lo et al. (2005) H.-K. Lo, X. Ma,  and K. Chen, “Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005).
Figure 1: The concept setup of the Soliton based QKD. The narrow linewidth pump laser generates the dissipative Kerr soliton (DKS) within the on-chip resonator. The soliton comb is then be used as the light source to realize the ultra-high speed (multi-user) QKD system by frequency multiplexing/demultiplexing.
Figure 2: (a) The experimental setup of the DKS source for frequency multiplexing and demultiplexing. The pump (Pump) and auxiliary (Aux) lasers are used to generate the DKS and to timely balance the heat fluctuation within the microresonator, respectively. The optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) and powermeter are used to monitor the output spectrum and power of the microresonator, respectively. The temperature of the microresonator is manually tuned by a temperature controller (TC) with the feedback of the OSA and powermeter. The laser polarizations before and after the microresonator are controlled by polarization controllers (PC1-PC3). The DKS is then be demultiplexed into a frequency source. (b) The measured power spectra of the soliton comb. (c) The measured power spectra of the output channels of the demultiplexing (DEMUX) in (a). (d) Channel crosstalk of the DEMUX. For left to right: the power spectra crosstalk of CH1 to CH5.
Figure 3: The experimental setup of the soliton-based QKD system. (a) The schematic setup of the multi-channel QKD system. Two QKD systems run independently with different channels. All channels are multiplexed and demultiplexed by the dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM). The length of the quantum channel is 25 km. (b) The encoding setup of the transmitters. (c) The structure of the Faraday-Sagnac-Michelson interferometer (FSMI). The blue line of the Sagnac loop is the polarization maintaining fiber. (d) and (e) The decoding setup of receivers with single and double single-photon detectors (SPDs), respectively. (DE)MUX: (de)multiplexing; BS: non-polarizing beam splitter; PBS: polarizing beam splitter; M: Faraday mirror; PM: phase modulator; IM: intensity modulator; Att: attenuator; Cir: circulator.
Figure 4: The QBER of the signal state (), raw key rate (RKR), sifted key rate (SfKR) and secret key rate (SKR) of the (a)-(b) single-channel and (d)-(f) multi-channel QKD systems. The regular triangle and square represent the experimental data of TR1. The inverted triangle and circle represent the experimental data of TR2. (c) The one hour real-time QBER of TR1 by CH1. The red star, black circle and blue regular triangle represent , and , respectively. The sending ratio of , and of the transmitter is 29:2:1. "TR1 CH1&TR2 CH2" means that system TR1 runs within CH1, while TR2 runs within CH2 simultaneously but independently.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
340726
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description