Pulsating lowmass white dwarfs in the frame of new evolutionary sequences
Key Words.:
asteroseismology — stars: oscillations — white dwarfs — stars: evolution — stars: interiorsAbstract
Context:Lowmass () white dwarfs, including the so called extremely lowmass white dwarfs (ELM, ), are being currently discovered in the field of our Galaxy through dedicated photometric surveys. The fact that some of them pulsate opens the unparalleled chance for sounding their interiors.
Aims:We present a detailed nonadiabatic pulsational analysis of such stars employing full evolutionary sequences of lowmass Hecore white dwarf models derived from binary star evolution computations. The main aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of the pulsation stability properties of variable lowmass white dwarfs during the terminal cooling branch .
Methods:Our nonadiabatic pulsation analysis is based on a new set of Hecore whitedwarf models with masses ranging from to derived by computing the nonconservative evolution of a binary system consisting of an initially ZAMS star and a neutron star. We have computed nonadiabatic radial () and nonradial () and modes to assess the dependence of the pulsational stability properties of these objects with stellar parameters such as the stellar mass, the effective temperature, and the convective efficiency.
Results:We found that a dense spectrum of unstable radial modes and nonradial and modes are driven by the mechanism due to the partial ionization of H in the stellar envelope, in addition to loworder unstable modes characterized by short pulsation periods which are significantly excited by H burning via the mechanism of mode driving. In all the cases, the characteristic times required for the modes to reach amplitudes large enough as to be observable (the folding times) are always shorter than cooling timescales. We explore the dependence of the ranges of unstable mode periods (the longest and shortest excited periods) with the effective temperature, the stellar mass, the convective efficiency, and the harmonic degree of the modes. We also compare our theoretical predictions with the excited modes observed in the seven known variable lowmass white dwarfs (ELMVs), and found an excellent agreement.
Conclusions:
1 Introduction
White dwarf (WD) stars constitute the last stage in the life of the majority () of stars populating the Universe, including our Sun (Winget & Kepler 2008; Fontaine & Brassard 2008; Althaus et al. 2010). Most of WDs show H rich atmospheres, defining the spectral class of DA WDs. The mass distribution of DA WDs peaks at , and exhibits also highmass and lowmass components (Kepler et al. 2007; Tremblay et al. 2011; Kleinman et al. 2013; Kepler et al. 2015). Lowmass () WDs are the result of strong massloss episodes in interacting binary systems during the red giant branch stage of lowmass stars before the onset of helium flash (see, for recent works, Althaus et al. 2013; Istrate et al. 2014). Since the ignition of He is avoided, they probably harbor cores of He, at variance with average mass WDs which are expected to have cores made of C and O. In particular, interacting binary evolution is the most likely origin for the extremely lowmass (ELM) WDs, which have masses below . Stateoftheart evolutionary computations of Althaus et al. (2013) (see also Althaus et al. 2001; Panei et al. 2007; Istrate et al. 2014), predict that ELM WDs must be characterized by very thick H envelopes which should be able to sustain residual H nuclear burning via chain, thus leading to very long evolutionary timescales ( yrs). In comparison, lowmass WDs with should have cooling timescales of the order of yrs. This is because their progenitors experience multiple diffusioninduced CNO thermonuclear flashes that engulf most of the H content of the envelope. As a result, the remnants enter their final cooling tracks with a very thin H envelope, which is unable to sustain stable nuclear burning while cools.
Many lowmass WDs, including ELM WDs, are being currently detected through the ELM survey and the SPY and WASP surveys (see Koester et al. 2009; Brown et al. 2010, 2012; Maxted et al. 2011; Kilic et al. 2011, 2012; Brown et al. 2013; Gianninas et al. 2014; Kilic et al. 2015). Interest in these stars has strongly increased following the discovery that some of them pulsate with periods compatible with highorder nonradial modes (Hermes et al. 2012, 2013b, 2013a; Kilic et al. 2015; Bell et al. 2015), providing the chance for sounding their interiors by employing asteroseismology. At the time of writing this paper, seven pulsating ELM WDs (hereafter ELMVs^{1}^{1}1For simplicity, here and throughout the paper we will refer to the pulsating lowmass WDs as ELMVs, even in the cases in which .) are known. It is interesting to put the ELMVs in the context of the other classes of pulsating WDs. In Fig. 1 we show the location of the ELMVs (big red circles), along with the several families of pulsating WDs known hitherto. The ELMV instability domain can be seen as an extension of the ZZ Ceti instability strip towards low effective temperatures and gravities. The variables ZZ Ceti or DAVs (pulsating DA WDs, with almost pure H atmospheres) are the most numerous ones. The other classes comprise the DQVs (atmospheres rich in He and C), the variables V777 Her or DBVs (atmospheres almost pure in He), the Hot DAVs (Hrich atmospheres), and the variables GW Vir (atmospheres dominated by C, O, and He) that include the DOVs and PNNVs objects. To this list, we have to add the newly discovered preELMVs (Maxted et al. 2013, 2014), the probable precursors of ELMV stars. Note that the effective temperatures of ELMVs are found to be between K and K, and so, they are the coolest pulsating WDs known up to date (see Fig. 1)
The classification of ELMV stars as a new, separate class of pulsating WDs is a matter of debate. On one hand, some authors (e.g. Van Grootel et al. 2013) consider the ELMVs as genuine ZZ Ceti stars but with very low masses. This conception is based on the fact that for both kinds of objects (which share the same spectroscopic classification as DA objects), the pulsations are excited by the same driving mechanism associated with the H partial ionization zone. However, there are significant differences between both types of stars. From the point of view of their origin and formation, the lowmass WD stars (including ELM WDs) seem to come from interacting binary evolution and should harbor cores made of unprocessed He. This is in contrast to the case of averagemass ZZ Cetis, that according to the standard evolutionary theory, are the result of singlestar evolution and must have cores made of C and O. In addition, the fact that so many constant (non variable) lowmass WDs coexist with ELMV WDs in the same domain of and ^{2}^{2}2That is, the domain of instability seems not to be “pure” (Hermes et al. 2013a), may be indicating substantially different internal structures and so, quite distinct evolutionary origins. This is in contrast to the well documented purity of the ZZ Ceti instability strip, which indicates that all the DA WDs crossing the effective temperature interval K do pulsate. Another distinctive feature of ELMVs is the length of their pulsation periods, that largely exceed s and reach up to s, much longer than the periods found in ZZ Ceti stars ( s). Indeed, the period at s detected in the ELMV SDSS J222859.93+362359.6 (Hermes et al. 2013a) is the longest period ever measured in a pulsating WD star.
On the theoretical side, the pulsation analysis by Córsico & Althaus (2014a) constitutes at present the most detailed and exhaustive investigation of the adiabatic properties of lowmass WDs. The background equilibrium models employed by those authors were extracted from the complete set of evolutionary sequences of lowmass Hecore WD models presented in Althaus et al. (2013). The results of Córsico & Althaus (2014a) (see also the pioneering works of Steinfadt et al. 2010; Córsico et al. 2012) indicate that modes in ELMVs are restricted mainly to the core regions and modes to the envelope, providing the chance to constrain both the core and envelope chemical structure of these stars via asteroseismology. On the other hand, nonadiabatic studies (Córsico et al. 2012; Van Grootel et al. 2013) predict that many unstable and modes are excited by the same partial ionization mechanism at work in ZZ Ceti stars, roughly at the right effective temperatures and the correct range of the periods observed in ELMVs. In this paper, our second work of the series on this topic, we perform a thorough stability analysis on the set of stateoftheart evolutionary models of Althaus et al. (2013). Preliminary results of this analysis were presented in the work of Córsico & Althaus (2014b), focused mainly on the role that stable H burning has in destabilizing loworder modes of ELM WD models. The results of that paper constitute the first theoretical evidence of pulsation modes excited by the mechanism in cool WD stars. Here, we extend that analysis by assessing the vibrational stability of radial () and nonradial () and modes for the complete set of 14 evolutionary sequences of Althaus et al. (2013) with masses in the range , considering both the and mechanisms of mode driving, and including different prescriptions of the MLT theory of convection.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we briefly describe our numerical tools and the main ingredients of the evolutionary sequences we employ to assess the nonadiabatic pulsation properties of lowmass Hecore WDs. In Sect. 3 we present in detail our pulsation results. Sect. 4 is devoted to compare the predictions of our nonadiabatic models with the ranges of excited periods in the observed stars. Finally, in Sect. 5 we summarize the main findings of the paper.
2 Computational tools and stellar models
2.1 Evolutionary code
The evolutionary WD models employed in our pulsational analysis were generated with the LPCODE evolutionary code, which produces complete and detailed WD models incorporating very updated physical ingredients. In addition, LPCODE computes in detail the full evolutionary stages leading to the WD formation, allowing to study the WD evolution in a consistent way with the expectations of the evolutionary history of progenitors. While detailed information about LPCODE can be found in Althaus et al. (2005, 2009, 2013) and references therein, we list below only those ingredients employed which are relevant for our analysis of lowmass, Hecore WD stars:

The standard Mixing Length Theory (MLT) for convection in the versions ML1, ML2 and ML3 is used. The ML1 version, due to BöhmVitense (1958), has and coefficients . The parameter is the mixing length in units of the local pressure scale height, and the coefficients appear in the equations for the average speed of the convective cell, the average convective flux, and the convective efficiency (see Cox 1968). The ML2 version, in turn, is due to Bohm & Cassinelli (1971), and also have , but coefficients . Finally, the ML3 version is characterized by and the same coefficients , and as in ML2. Physically, the main difference between these different prescriptions of MLT is the increasing convective efficiency going from ML1 to ML3 (for details, see Tassoul et al. 1990).

Metallicity of the progenitor stars has been assumed to be .

Radiative opacities for arbitrary metallicity in the range from 0 to 0.1 are from the OPAL project (Iglesias & Rogers 1996). At low temperatures, we use the updated molecular opacities with varying C/O ratios computed at Wichita State University (Ferguson et al. 2005) and presented by Weiss & Ferguson (2009).

Conductive opacities are those of Cassisi et al. (2007).

The equation of state during the main sequence evolution is that of OPAL for H and Herich composition.

For the WD regime we have employed an updated version of the Magni & Mazzitelli (1979) equation of state.

The nuclear network takes into account 16 elements and 34 thermonuclear reaction rates for ppchains, CNO bicycle, He burning, and C ignition.

Timedependent diffusion due to gravitational settling and chemical and thermal diffusion of nuclear species has been taken into account following the multicomponent gas treatment of Burgers (1969).

Abundance changes have been computed according to element diffusion, nuclear reactions, and convective mixing. This detailed treatment of abundance changes by different processes during the WD regime constitutes a key aspect in the evaluation of the importance of residual nuclear burning for the cooling of lowmass WDs.

For the WD regime and for effective temperatures lower than K, outer boundary conditions for the evolving models are derived from nongrey model atmospheres (Rohrmann et al. 2012).
2.2 Pulsation code
We carry out our pulsation analysis of radial () and nonradial () and modes employing the nonadiabatic versions of the LPPUL pulsation code described in detail in Córsico et al. (2006). For the nonradial computations, the code solves the sixthorder complex system of linearized equations and boundary conditions as given by Unno et al. (1989). For the case of radial modes, LPPUL solves the fourthorder complex system of linearized equations and boundary conditions according to Saio et al. (1983), with the simplifications of Kawaler (1993). Our nonadiabatic computations rely on the frozenconvection (FC) approximation, in which the perturbation of the convective flux is neglected. While this approximation is known to give unrealistic locations of the mode red edge of the ZZ Ceti instability strip, it leads to satisfactory predictions for the location of the blue edge (Van Grootel et al. 2012) (see also Saio 2013, for an enlightening discussion of this topic).
2.3 Model sequences
Hflash  

0.1554  25.4  3.13  No 
0.1612  20.6  4.44  No 
0.1650  18.7  5.53  No 
0.1706  16.3  6.59  No 
0.1762  14.5  7.56  No 
0.1806  3.68  0.34  Yes 
0.1863  4.36  0.37  Yes 
0.1917  4.49  0.35  Yes 
0.2019  3.80  0.32  Yes 
0.2389  3.61  0.62  Yes 
0.2707  1.09  0.33  Yes 
0.3205  1.60  0.91  Yes 
0.3624  0.80  0.58  Yes 
0.4352  0.63  0.91  No 
Star  Period range  Ref.  

[K]  [cgs]  []  [K]  [cgs]  []  [s]  
SDSS J222859.93362359.6  (2)  
SDSS J161431.28191219.4  (2)  
PSR J17380333  (4)  
SDSS J161831.69385415.15  (5)  
SDSS J184037.78+642312.3  (1)  
SDSS J111215.82+111745.0  (3)  
SDSS J151826.68065813.2  (3) 
References: (1) Hermes et al. (2012); (2) Hermes et al. (2013a); (3) Hermes et al. (2013b); (4) Kilic et al. (2015); (5) Bell et al. (2015)
Althaus et al. (2013) derived realistic configurations for lowmass Hecore WDs by mimicking the binary evolution of progenitor stars. Full details about this procedure are given in Althaus et al. (2013) and Córsico & Althaus (2014a). Binary evolution was assumed to be fully nonconservative, and the loss of angular momentum due to mass loss, gravitational wave radiation, and magnetic braking was considered. All of the Hecore WD initial models were derived from evolutionary calculations for binary systems consisting of an evolving Main Sequence lowmass component of initially and a neutron star as the other component. A total of 14 initial Hecore WD models with stellar masses between and were computed for initial orbital periods at the beginning of the Roche lobe phase in the range to d. In Table 1, we provide some relevant characteristics of the whole set of Hecore WD models. The evolution of these models was computed down to the range of luminosities of cool WDs, including the stages of multiple thermonuclear CNO flashes during the beginning of cooling branch. Column 1 of Table 1 shows the resulting final stellar masses (). The second column corresponds to the total amount of H contained in the envelope () at K (at the final cooling branch), and column 3 displays the time spent by the WD models to cool from K to K. Finally, column 4 indicates the occurrence (or not) of CNO flashes on the early WD cooling branch. There exists a threshold in the stellar mass value (at ), below which CNO flashes on the early WD cooling branch are not expected to occur, in agreement with previous studies (Sarna et al. 2000; Althaus et al. 2001; Nelson et al. 2004). Sequences with have thicker H envelopes and much longer cooling timescales than sequences with stellar masses above that mass threshold. To put this in numbers, the H content and (the time to cool from K to K) for the sequence with are and times larger, respectively, than for the sequence with (see Table 1). Note that in this example, we are comparing the properties of two sequences with virtually the same stellar mass (). The slow evolution of the nonflashing sequences is due to that the residual H burning is the main source of surface luminosity, even at very advanced stages of evolution. We show in Fig. 2 the complete set of evolutionary tracks (final cooling branches) of our lowmass Hecore WDs, along with the seven ELMVs discovered so far. We include the location of ELMV stars with and values derived from 1D model atmospheres (large red circles), as well as for the case in which these parameters are corrected for 3D effects (small black circles) following Tremblay et al. (2015). These parameters are shown in Table 2. The corrected effective temperatures and gravities are extracted directly from Tremblay et al. (2015), except for the star SDSS J16183854, for which we use the fitting functions given by those authors. Visibly, 3D corrections lower the estimated 1D and , implying lower masses (compare columns 4 and 7 of the Table).
3 Stability analysis
We analyze the stability pulsation properties of about 7000 stellar models of Hecore, lowmass WDs corresponding to a total of 42 evolutionary sequences that include three different prescriptions for the MLT theory of convection (ML1, ML2, ML3; see Tassoul et al. 1990), and covering a range of effective temperatures of K and a range of stellar masses of . For each model, we assessed the pulsation stability of radial () and nonradial () and modes with periods from a range s for the sequence with , up to a range of periods of s for the sequence of with . Certainly, these ranges of periods are extremely wide when compared to the range of periods observed in ELMVs so far ( s). The reason for considering such wide ranges of periods in our computations is to clearly define the theoretical domain of instability, that is, to find the long and shortperiod edges of the instability domains for all the stellar masses and effective temperatures.
We start by discussing the stability properties of a template lowmass Hecore WD model with K and ML2 (). Its location in the diagram is displayed in Fig. 2 as a hollow square. These properties are qualitatively the same for all the models of our complete set of evolutionary sequences. The normalized growth rate (, where and are the real and the imaginary part, respectively, of the complex eigenfrequency ) in terms of pulsation periods for overstable and 2 modes corresponding to the selected model is shown in Fig. 3. () implies unstable (stable) modes. The range of periods of unstable modes is not dependent on the harmonic degree, unlike to what happens in the case of modes, for which the period interval of unstable modes for is shifted to shorter periods when compared with the range of unstable mode periods. For radial modes and modes, the growth rate reaches a maximum value () in the vicinity of the shortperiod edge of the instability domain. In other words, within a given band of unstable modes, the excitation is markedly stronger for modes characterized by short periods (high frequencies). The opposite holds for modes, for which the largest excitation () corresponds to the longperiod boundary of the domain of unstable modes. Radial modes and modes with increasing periods (decreasing radial order ) are all unstable, even the lowest order modes, although with the minimum excitation value (). Something quite different occurs in the case of modes. Specifically, the value of for modes gradually decreases for decreasing periods, until it reaches negative values for modes with which are pulsationally stable. However, modes with and are again unstable, although with very small growth rates (). In the case of , even the mode () is unstable, as it is clearly documented in Fig. 3. As we will discuss below, stable nuclear burning of H plays a role in destabilizing these loworder modes (), aside from the strong driving associated to the partial ionization of H.
We select two representative unstable pulsation modes of the template model in order to investigate the details of the driving/damping process. Specifically, we choose two overstable dipole modes, one of them being a mode with and the other one a mode with (marked with arrows in Fig. 3). In the upper (lower) panel of Fig. 4 we display the differential work function and the running work integral (see Lee & Bradley 1993, for a definition) for the unstable mode ( mode), characterized by s, ( s, ). Note that the scales for and are arbitrary. Also shown are the Rosseland opacity () and its derivatives (), and the logarithm of the thermal timescale (). We restrict the figure to the envelope region of the model, where the main driving and damping occurs. The region that destabilizes the modes (where ) is clearly associated with the bump in the opacity due to the ionization of H at the outer convection zone (gray area in the Figure), centered at , although the maximum driving comes from a slightly more internal regions ( for the mode and for the mode). The thermal timescale reaches values of the order of s at the driving region, compatible with the longest excited period of the template model, at s. In the driving region the quantity is increasing outward, in agreement with the well known necessary condition for mode excitation (Unno et al. 1989). For the mode, the contributions to driving at from to largely overcome the weak damping effects at and , as reflected by the fact that at the surface, and so the mode is globally excited. Similarly, the strong driving experienced by the mode (denoted by positive values of for ) makes this mode globally unstable.
3.1 The destabilizing role of H burning
K  s  
0.1554  25.4  3.13  2 (1)  44.7  
3 (1)  3.2  
2 (2)  26.1  
3 (2)  15.7  
4 (2)  9.5  
0.1612  20.6  4.44  2 (1)  5.6  
3 (1)  10.1  
1 (2)  148.0  
2 (2)  5.6  
3 (2)  7.4  
0.1650  18.7  5.53  1 (1)  79.0  
2 (1)  32.5  
3 (1)  4.25  
4 (1)  6.9  
2 (2)  11.1  
3 (2)  11.1  
0.1706  16.3  6.59  1 (1)  131.8  
2 (1)  6.3  
3 (1)  2.6  
1 (2)  659  
2 (2)  3.4  
3 (2)  11.4  
0.1762  14.5  7.56  1 (1)  5.4  
2 (1)  37.8  
3 (1)  10.8  
4 (1)  84  
5 (1)  126  
1 (2)  378  
2 (2)  18.9  
3 (2)  30.4  
0.1806  3.68  0.34  1 (1)  6.8  
2 (1)  17  
1 (2)  0.85  
0.1863  4.36  0.37  1 (1)  0.74  
2 (1)  0.62  
1 (2)  0.65  
2 (2)  0.54  
0.1917  4.49  0.35  1 (1)  0.78  
2 (1)  0.49  
1 (2)  0.61  
2 (2)  0.13  
0.2019  3.80  0.32  1 (1)  3.6  
1 (2)  1.28  
0.2389  3.61  0.62  1 (1)  15.5  
2 (1)  4.1  
1 (2)  10.3  
2 (2)  8.9 
Córsico & Althaus (2014b) have explored the impact of stable H burning on the pulsational stability properties of the same models of lowmass Hecore WDs analyzed here. They found that, besides a dense spectrum of unstable radial modes and nonradial and modes driven by the mechanism due to the partial ionization of H in the stellar envelope, some unstable modes with short pulsation periods are also destabilized by H burning via the mechanism (Unno et al. 1989) of mode driving. Córsico & Althaus (2014b) speculate that the short periods at s and s detected in the ELMV star SDSS J11121117 (Hermes et al. 2013b) could be excited by this mechanism. If true, this could constitute the first evidence of the existence of stable H burning in cool WD stars. These interesting results rely, however, in the reality of those short pulsation periods, something that needs additional observations to be confirmed (J. J. Hermes, private communication).
In order to show how the mechanism acts to destabilize loworder modes in our models, we restrict the description to the mode of our selected template model. This mode is unstable, with . Admittedly, this growth rate is extremely small, and one can wonder if this mode, being marginally unstable, is able to reach amplitudes large enough as to be observable. To answer that question we have to examine the folding time, defined as . For this mode, yr. This is an estimate of the time it would take the mode to reach amplitudes large enough as to be observable. It has to be compared with the evolutionary timescale () which represents the time that the model spends evolving in the regime of interest. In this case, we have yr^{3}^{3}3More precisely, this is the time that the template model takes to cool from K to K.. Since , we conclude that the mode has plenty of time to develop large amplitudes while the star is slowly cooling at that effective temperature regime.
In order to assess the role that stable H burning has in the destabilization of the mode of the template model, we have redone the stability computations, but this time by suppressing the action of this destabilizing agent. Specifically, we force the nuclear energy production rate, , and their logarithmic derivatives and to be zero in the pulsation equations. The results are shown in the right panel of Fig. 5, that shows the differential work function () in terms of the mass fraction coordinate for the case in which the mechanism is allowed to operate (solid black curve) and when it is suppressed (solid red curve). Also shown are the scaled running work integrals, (dotted curves). The left panel of the Figure displays the Lagrangian perturbation of temperature, . The peak of the (scaled) nuclear generation rate at marks the location of the Hburning shell at the He/H chemical interface. We emphasize the position of the outermost maximum of with a black dot. The mechanism behaves as an efficient filter of modes that provides substantial driving only to those modes that have their largest maximum of in the narrow region of the burning shell (Kawaler et al. 1986). The mode with met this condition.
In the case in which the mechanism is taken into account, there is appreciable driving () at the region of the H burning shell (), as can be appreciated from the right panel of Fig. 5. The destabilizing effect of nuclear burning adds up to the excitation due to the H partial ionization at the envelope (), and the mode is globally unstable. Both contributions of driving are also visible as positive slopes of the work integral at those locations of the model. When we suppress the mechanism (red curves), strong damping takes place at the region of the burning shell. In this case, the driving due to the H partial ionization at the envelope is not able to overcome the damping at that region, and the mode results pulsationally stable. We can conclude that for this specific model, the mode with is globally unstable thanks to the destabilizing effect of the Hburning shell through the mechanism.
A more general and comprehensive perspective of the role of the mechanism in our pulsation models can be achieved by examining the properties of our template model for the full range of effective temperatures. In the left panel of Fig. 6 we show the instability domain of periods in terms of the effective temperature for the ELM WD model sequence with . The palette of colors (right scale) indicates the value of the logarithm of the folding time (in years) of each unstable mode. As can be seen, many unstable pulsation modes exist, which are clearly grouped in the two families, one of them corresponding to long periods and associated with modes, and the other one characterized by short periods and belonging to modes. Most of these modes are destabilized by the mechanism acting at the surface H partial ionization zone. The strongest excitation, that is, the smallest folding time (light red and yellow zones), is found for highorder and modes, with periods in the ranges s and s, respectively, and effective temperatures near the hot boundary of the instability islands ( K). Similar results, although with shorter unstable mode periods () s, are obtained for (not shown). The right panel of Fig. 6 shows the results of our stability computations when we shut down the mechanism. Interestingly enough, the and modes become stable for the complete range of effective temperatures analyzed, and they do not appear in this plot. Something similar happens with the modes with , and in certain ranges of . We can conclude that these modes are excited to a great extent by the mechanism through the Hburning shell. We note that highorder modes are insensitive to the effects of nuclear burning, and the same holds for the complete spectrum of modes and radial modes.
In Table 3 we present the shortperiod modes for which the mechanism strongly contributes to their destabilization, corresponding to sequences with stellar masses below . Note that the number of destabilized modes is larger for sequences with masses , by virtue that these models have thick H envelopes and, as a result, they are able to sustain an intense H nuclear burning. For models with , nuclear burning is much weaker, but still able to contribute to the driving of modes with radial order . Note, however, that in the case of models with and , the folding times are shorter than the evolutionary timescale, with ratios . These modes, although formally unstable, do not have enough time as to reach observable amplitudes while the star is crossing the interval K. For masses above (not shown) only modes with and are destabilized modes.
3.2 Characterizing the blue edge of the theoretical ELMV instability strip
Here, we examine the location of the instability domains of our lowmass Hecore WDs for radial and nonradial and modes on the plane. The locus of the blue (hot) edge of instability is illustrated in Fig. 7 for the case in which the surface convection in the equilibrium models is treated according to the ML2 version of the MLT theory. A note about the way in which the blue edge is defined in this work is in order. Generally, as the models of our evolutionary sequences cool, the first modes to became unstable are those of low radial order (). In most cases, the mechanism plays a crucial role in the destabilization of these modes (see Figs. 5 and 6). At something lower s, higher order modes () are destabilized, while intermediate order modes () remain pulsationally stable at those effective temperatures (Fig. 6). This is particularly notorious in our less massive () sequences. So, in defining the blue edge of instability for modes, we adopt the effective temperature at which the bulk of modes () become unstable^{4}^{4}4If, instead, we were adopting the at which modes with become unstable, then the blue edges would be somewhat hotter.. In the case of radial modes and nonradial modes, there is no ambiguity since these modes are destabilized gradually, starting from the lowest radial orders ( for radial modes and for modes).
Fig. 7 shows that the blue edges associated to radial modes and nonradial modes are K hotter than those corresponding to modes. This means that radial modes and nonradial modes are first destabilized as the models cool, as it can be clearly appreciated from Fig. 6. We found also that the blue edge of radial modes is slightly cooler than that of the modes, and that the blue edge for the modes is largely independent on the harmonic degree. On the other hand, the blue edge of modes is weakly sensitive to the value, being up to K hotter for than for .
The dependence of the blue edges of instability with the convective efficiency adopted in the equilibrium models is documented in Fig. 8, in which we show the diagrams displaying our lowmass Hecore WD evolutionary tracks along with the blue (hot) edge of the ELMV instability strip for radial ( and nonradial () and modes, corresponding to different versions of the MLT theory of convection: ML1 (blue), ML2 (black), and ML3 (red). As expected, the blue edge in the case of the ML3 version is hotter than for the ML2 version, and it in turn is hotter than the ML1 prescription. The shift in the effective temperature of the blue edges for the different versions of the MLT is between K and K. The main result exhibited by this figure is that only the ML2 and ML3 prescriptions of the MLT actually account for all the observed ELMV stars (filled red and black circles), regardless whether or not 3D model atmosphere corrections are considered to estimate and . Interestingly, no ELMV is found to be hotter than the blue edge associated to the ML2 version, but it can be due to the small sample of stars.
Our blue edge for modes with ML2 is in excellent agreement with the blue edges derived by Van Grootel et al. (2013), shown in the lower left panel of Fig. 8 with a black dashed line in the case of a time dependent convection treatment (TDC), and with a black dotdashed line when those authors use the FC approximation. Note that the agreement between our computations and those of Van Grootel et al. (2013) breaks down for masses smaller than the limit mass , below which CNO flashes on the early WD cooling branch are not expected to occur. We have also included an estimation for the red edge, as proposed by Van Grootel et al. (2013) (black dotted line). This estimation is based on the atmosphere energy leakage argument elaborated by Hansen et al. (1985). It is apparent that the proposed red edge from Van Grootel et al. (2013) does not describe the observations.
We now explore the ranges of periods of unstable modes and their dependence with stellar mass, the effective temperature and the version of the MLT theory employed. Fig. 9 shows the unstable radial and nonradial and modes on the plane for the evolutionary sequences with and . The periods of unstable nonradial modes for each sequence are clearly grouped in two separated regions, one of them characterized by short periods and corresponding to modes, and the other one characterized by long periods and associated to modes. In the case of radial modes, there is a single instability region with periods very similar to those of the nonradial modes. In the case of , there is the mode in between the regions of and modes. The longest excited periods for modes reach values up to s () and s () for the lowestmass sequence (), and these numbers drastically decrease to s () and s () for the most massive sequence (). The shortest excited periods, in turn, range from s () and s () for , to s () and s () for . So, the longest and shorter excited periods of modes are larger for lower and smaller . In the case of radial modes and nonradial modes, the shortest excited periods range from s () up to s (). Notably, the shortest excited periods of modes are insensitive to the value of . On the other hand, the longest excited periods (which also are insensitive to the value of ) go from s () to s (). We conclude that the longest and shortest excited periods of modes and radial modes are larger for lower and they do not depend on . We did not find qualitative differences in the characteristics of the instability domains of radial and nonradial modes, except for a very small shift in the effective temperature of the blue edges, as mentioned before.
Regarding the strength of the mode instability, we found that generally the most unstable modes (that is, with the shortest folding times) are those characterized by high radial orders. As for the dependence of the destabilization of modes with , we found that the most unstable pulsation modes correspond to stellar models located near to the blue edge of instability. The modes gradually become less unstable as the model cools. All these properties are clearly illustrated in Fig. 9. In the context of our nonadiabatic calculations, which assume the FC approximation, the red edge of the instability domain (that is, the effective temperature at which the pulsations stop) is located at about K (not shown in Fig. 9), much lower than the of the coolest known ELMV star (SDSS J2228+3623, K). This disagreement can not be attributed, however, to the use the FC approximation since an identical result is found by Van Grootel et al. (2013) using a TDC treatment (see their Figure 3)^{5}^{5}5This red edge, which emerges from the nonadiabatic computations of Van Grootel et al. (2013), should not be confused with the estimation of the red edge carried out by the same authors on the basis of the atmosphere energy leakage argument (Fig. 9).. Similarly, Van Grootel et al. (2012) found K for the red edge of ZZ Ceti stars. Clearly, a missing physical mechanism is at work in real stars, that quenches the pulsations at much higher effective temperatures.
Finally, we have examined the dependence of the longest and shortest excited periods with the prescription of the MLT theory employed. For sequences with , we found that the longest excited period of modes is substantially larger for higher convective efficiency. In particular, in the case of the sequence with , we found that the longest excited period is s for ML1, s for ML2, and s for ML3. On the other hand, for sequences with the trend is the opposite: the longest excited period of modes is shorter for higher convective efficiency, although the differences are small. For instance, for the sequence with , we found that the longest unstable period is s (ML1), s (ML2), and s (ML3). Regarding the shortest excited periods for modes, we do not found an appreciable dependence with the convective efficiency of the models. In the case of modes and radial modes, we found that the largest and shortest excited periods are rather insensitive to the version of the MLT employed, having however a weak trend of higher shortest and longest unstable periods with higher convective efficiency.
4 Comparison with the observed ELMVs
Having shown that our theoretical predictions are in good agreement with the position of the ELMVs in the diagram —provided that the stellar models are computed with the ML2 version of the MLT theory of convection—, in this Section want to compare the theoretical ranges of periods associated to unstable modes with the pulsation periods exhibited by the observed stars. In Table 2 we show the main spectroscopic data available for the seven ELMV stars known up to now. We include the values of and derived from 1D model atmospheres and the stellar mass computed from the tracks of Althaus et al. (2013), and also in the case in which and are corrected by 3D effects, following Tremblay et al. (2015). Here, we first shall adopt the effective temperatures and gravities of ELMV stars derived from 1D model atmospheres, and next we will consider the case in which the values are corrected by 3D effects.
It should be noted that, for ELM stars, only and can be directly constrained from observations and model atmospheres, and not their stellar mass. In order to get the mass, it is necessary to assume some evolutionary stage, because many lowmass WD evolutionary tracks overlap at different stages due to the developments of CNO flashes (see Fig. 2 of Althaus et al. 2013). Because of this, the masses of ELMVs could be off by or more if the ELM WD is experiencing a CNO flash.
4.1 Using and derived from 1D model atmospheres
We start by considering the ELMV star SDSS J22283623, the coolest and less massive object of the class detected to date ( K and ). The pulsations of this star were discovered by Hermes et al. (2013a). The fact that this star is so cool as compared with the six warmer pulsating ELMVs rises the question of whether this star is an authentic ELMV star or is instead a more massive preELM WD that is looping through the diagram prior to settling on its final WD cooling track (Hermes et al. 2013a). The hypothesis that this star might be a preWD is interesting, even taking into account that the evolution of the preWDs is much faster than that of the ELM WDs, and therefore there are far fewer opportunities of observing it. This issue has been examined by Córsico & Althaus (2014a), but without conclusive results. In Fig. 10 we show the theoretical unstable mode periods corresponding to the evolutionary sequence of , the closest stellar mass of our grid to the mass inferred for this star. We also include the pulsation periods of SDSS J22283623 at 3254.5 s, 4178.3 s, and 6234.9 s. The three periods are well accounted for by the theoretical computations, being the longest period ( s) quite close to the theoretical upper limit of unstable mode periods at the lower limit of of this star ( s). Note that for the effective temperatures of interest, modes are still quite unstable, with folding times of roughly yrs.
The ELMV star SDSS J16141912 also was discovered to be pulsating by Hermes et al. (2013a). This star has K and , and pulsate in just two periods, at 1184.1 s and 1262.7 s. These are relatively short periods when compared with the periods detected in the other ELMVs, except SDSS J1112+1117 (see below). This is something striking in view that, being the second coldest known ELMV star (after SDSS J22283623), its relatively short periods do not match the well known trend in ZZ Ceti stars of an increase of pulsation periods for lower effective temperatures (Clemens 1993; Mukadam et al. 2006). According to its stellar mass, we have to compare these periods with the theoretical range of unstable mode periods of our sequence with . This comparison is displayed in Fig. 11. Clearly, both periods are well accounted for by the theoretical computations.
Next, we focus our attention on the ELMV stars SDSS J15180658 (Hermes et al. 2013b) and SDSS J16183854 (Bell et al. 2015), which have K and K , respectively. With a stellar mass of estimated for these two stars, they are the most massive ELMVs known hitherto. We compare the observed periods with the theoretical predictions corresponding to the evolutionary sequences with and , thus embracing the stellar mass derived for both stars. We show the results in Fig. 12. The 13 periods exhibited by SDSS J15180658 in the range s are well supported by our nonadiabatic computations. Indeed, the detected periods, particularly those longer than s, correspond to the most unstable theoretical modes of the instability domain, characterized by folding times in the range yrs. In the case of SDSS J16183854, our theoretical computations are successful in reproducing the shortest observed periods at 2543 s and 4935 s, but fail in predict the existence of the longest one (6125 s). So, if our nonadiabatic models are a good representatation of ELMVs, we can rule out the masses and for this star from the exhibited period range alone.
Finally, in Fig. 13 we depict the situation for the remainder three ELMV stars, SDSS J1112+1117 (Hermes et al. 2013b), SDSS J1840+6423 (Hermes et al. 2012), and PSR J1738+0333 (Kilic et al. 2015). These stars have stellar masses , and , respectively, near the critical mass for the development of CNO flashes (). As it was shown in Córsico & Althaus (2014a), ELM stars in this range of masses can harbor very different internal chemical structures and in particular quite distinct H layer thicknesses, which should be reflected in their pulsation spectra. So, future asteroseismological analysis of these stars will have the potential of place strong constraints on the previous evolutionary history of their progenitors. We include in Fig. 13 the domains of unstable mode periods corresponding to the sequences with and , thus enclosing the masses inferred for the three stars. The figure reveals that the periods measured in these stars are well accounted for by our stability computations. The case of SDSS J1112+1117 is particularly interesting because this is the only ELMV star showing short periods (108 s and 134 s), in addition to long periods ( s) typical of the class. Hermes et al. (2013b) proposed the possibility that these short periods could be associated to modes. This idea was examined by Córsico & Althaus (2014a), who found that, in the frame of the models of Althaus et al. (2013), if the temperature and mass (gravity) of the star are correct, the short periods cannot be attributed to modes nor radial modes. Alternatively, Córsico & Althaus (2014b) demonstrated that these short periods can be associated to loworder modes destabilized mainly by the mechanism by stable nuclear burning at the basis of the H envelope.
4.2 Using and corrected by 3D model atmosphere effects
Here, we assess how well our theoretical computations fit the observations when we adopt the ELMV and parameters after 3D corrections as given by Tremblay et al. (2015). Note that the situation for SDSS J2228+3623 does not change, because its effective temperature do not experience a significant shift when 3D corrections are taken into account ( K; see Table2) and, although the shift is large, the mass of the star still is below to . Thus, the comparison already shown in Fig. 10 holds even when we adopt the 3D corrected () for this star. Since the longperiod boundary of the domain of unstable modes is longer for lower stellar masses, we conclude that the theoretical computations are in good agreement with the range of excited periods of SDSS J2228+3623. In the case of SDSS J1840+6423, on the other hand, since the stellar mass is when we consider 3D corrected parameters (see Fig. 2), the comparison between observed and theoretical ranges of excited periods shown in Fig. 13 is still valid. In particular, the observed range of excited periods is well accounted for by the theoretical computations corresponding to the sequence with when the effective temperature of this star shifts from K (1D) to K (3D).
For the remainder five ELMVs, the , and change substantially when we correct by 3D effects, and we must make further comparisons. To begin with, in Fig. 14 we show the case of SDSS J11121117, in which the observed periods are compared with the excited theoretical periods of the and sequences. In this case, the turns out to be K lower and the stellar mass goes from to , when we take into account the 3D corrections. Clearly, the observed range of periods is well reproduced by the theoretical computations. Interestingly, we found that in this case the shortest periods at 108 s and 134 s could be safely identified with the mode of the sequence, at variance with the conclusion of Córsico & Althaus (2014a) who considered the and derived from 1D model atmospheres.
In Fig. 15 we illustrate the cases of PSR J1738+0333 and SDSS J1614+1912, where the observed ranges of periods are compared with the theoretical ones corresponding to the sequences with and . Clearly, the observed ranges of excited periods in these stars is well accounted for the theoretical computations.
The situation for SDSS J1618+3854 is depicted in Fig. 16. The comparison in this case is made with the theoretical unstable modes corresponding to the and sequences. There is a good agreement between the observations and the theoretical predictions. In particular, the existence of the longest period at 6125 s is reliably predicted by our stability computations. This is at variance with the case in which we adopted the and derived from 1D model atmospheres (see Fig. 12). This finding gives strong support to the 3D model atmosphere calculations of Tremblay et al. (2015).
Finally, we display in Fig. 17 the case of SDSS J1518+0658, for which we compare the observed range of periods with the theoretical computations corresponding to the sequences with and . Again in this case our theoretical predictions are in excellent agreement with the range of excited periods observed in the star.
We close this section by noting that for all the analyzed ELMV stars, the number of periods detected is disappointingly low in comparison with the rich spectrum of periods of unstable modes, that include radial and nonradial and modes, as predicted by theoretical computations. As for the other classes of pulsating WDs, there must be some unknown filter mechanism present in real stars, that favors only a few periods (out of the available dense spectrum of eigenmodes) to reach observable amplitudes. Finding that missing piece of physics in our pulsation models is well beyond the scope of the present paper.
5 Summary and conclusions
In this paper, we have presented a detailed pulsation stability study of pulsating lowmass WDs employing the set of stateoftheart evolutionary models of Althaus et al. (2013). This is the second paper of a series on this topic, being the first one focused on the adiabatic properties of lowmass WDs (Córsico & Althaus 2014a). Preliminary results of the nonadiabatic analysis detailed here have been already presented in Córsico & Althaus (2014b), focused mainly on the role that stable H burning has in destabilizing loworder modes of ELM WD models. In the present paper, we extend that analysis by assessing the pulsational stability of radial () and nonradial () and modes for the complete set of 14 evolutionary sequences of lowmass Hecore WD models of Althaus et al. (2013) with masses in the range , considering both the and mechanisms of mode excitation, and including different prescriptions of the MLT theory of convection.
Our main findings are:

For all the model sequences analyzed, a dense spectrum of unstable radial modes and nonradial and modes are excited by the mechanism due to the H partial ionization zone in the stellar envelope. In addition, some shortperiod modes are destabilized mainly by the mechanism due to stable nuclear burning at the basis of the H envelope (Fig. 6), particularly for model sequences with (see Table 3).

The blue edge of the instability domain in the plane is hotter for higher the stellar mass and convective efficiency (Fig. 7). The ML2 and ML3 versions of the MLT theory of convection are the only ones that correctly accounts for the location of the seven known ELMV stars, regardless of whether the and for the stars is derived from standard 1D model atmospheres or if these parameters are corrected by 3D effects (see Fig. 8). There is no dependence of the blue edge of modes with the harmonic degree; in the case of modes, we found a weak sensitivity of the blue edge with . Finally, the blue edges corresponding to radial and nonradial modes are somewhat ( K) hotter than the blue edges of modes.

Generally, the most unstable modes (shorter folding times) are those characterized by high and intermediate radial orders. For instance, in the case of the sequence with and ML2, the most unstable modes have periods between s and s ( between and ) for modes, and periods between s () and s () for modes and radial modes. The most unstable modes correspond to stellar models located near to the blue edge of the instability domain (see Fig. 9).

The longest and shorter excited periods of modes are longer for lower and smaller . In the case of modes and radial modes, the longest and shortest excited periods are longer for lower , although they do not depend on .

For sequences with , the longest excited periods of modes are substantially longer for higher convective efficiency. On the contrary, for the longest excited periods of modes are shorter for higher convective efficiency, although the differences are small. In the case of modes and radial modes, we found a very weak trend of longer shortest and longest unstable periods with higher convective efficiency.

We compared the ranges of unstable mode periods predicted by our stability analysis with the ranges of periods observed in the ELMV stars. Irrespective of whether we adopt the () derived from 1D model atmospheres or these parameters corrected by 3D effects, we found generally an excellent agreement, as shown by Figs. 10 to 17.

In the specific case of SDSS J1618+3854, if we adopt and as derived from 1D model atmosphere computations, our nonadiabatic models are unable to explain the existence of the longest period at 6125 s (Fig. 12). However, this period is reliably predicted when we adopt and values corrected by 3D model atmosphere effects (Fig. 16). This gives strong support to the 3D model atmospheres of Tremblay et al. (2015).
The results of this study, along with those of previous research (Steinfadt et al. 2010; Córsico et al. 2012; Van Grootel et al. 2013; Córsico & Althaus 2014b), allow us to know the origin and basic nature of the pulsations exhibited by ELMV stars. However, even though theoretical models reproduce qualitatively the observations, some essential unknowns still remain. For instance, there is the problem of the red edge of the instability strip. Our calculations, which assume the FC approximation, as well as those of Van Grootel et al. (2013), which include a TDC treatment, predict a red edge extremely cool ( K) as compared with the coolest ELMV star (SDSS J2228+3623, K). Fortunately, this incomplete knowledge of the physics of WD pulsations does not prevent us from moving forward in asteroseismological studies based on adiabatic calculations, in which it does not matter the physical agent that drives the pulsations, but the value of the periods themselves, which depend sensitively on the internal structure of the WD star. Asteroseismological analysis will provide valuable clues about the internal structure and evolutionary status of lowmass WDs, allowing us to place constraints on the binary evolutionary processes involved in their formation. But in order to extend the parameter space to explore, we have to consider a possible range of H envelope thicknesses. We plan to compute new evolutionary sequences of lowmass Hecore WDs with different angularmomentum loss prescriptions due to mass loss, which could have an impact on the final H envelope mass. Results of these investigations will be presented in an upcoming paper.
Acknowledgements.
We wish to thank our anonymous referee for the constructive comments and suggestions that greatly improved the original version of the paper. We warmly thank K. J. Bell and J. J. Hermes for reading the paper and making enlightening comments and suggestions. Part of this work was supported by AGENCIA through the Programa de Modernización Tecnológica BID 1728/OCAR, and by the PIP 11220080100940 grant from CONICET. This research has made use of NASA Astrophysics Data System.References
 Althaus et al. (2010) Althaus, L. G., Córsico, A. H., Isern, J., & GarcíaBerro, E. 2010, A&A Rev., 18, 471
 Althaus et al. (2013) Althaus, L. G., Miller Bertolami, M. M., & Córsico, A. H. 2013, A&A, 557, A19
 Althaus et al. (2009) Althaus, L. G., Panei, J. A., Romero, A. D., et al. 2009, A&A, 502, 207
 Althaus et al. (2001) Althaus, L. G., Serenelli, A. M., & Benvenuto, O. G. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 471
 Althaus et al. (2005) Althaus, L. G., Serenelli, A. M., Panei, J. A., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 631
 Bell et al. (2015) Bell, K. J., Kepler, S. O., Montgomery, M. H., et al. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 493, 19th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, ed. P. Dufour, P. Bergeron, & G. Fontaine, 217
 Bohm & Cassinelli (1971) Bohm, K. H. & Cassinelli, J. 1971, A&A, 12, 21
 BöhmVitense (1958) BöhmVitense, E. 1958, ZAp, 46, 108
 Brown et al. (2013) Brown, W. R., Kilic, M., Allende Prieto, C., Gianninas, A., & Kenyon, S. J. 2013, ApJ, 769, 66
 Brown et al. (2010) Brown, W. R., Kilic, M., Allende Prieto, C., & Kenyon, S. J. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1072
 Brown et al. (2012) —. 2012, ApJ, 744, 142
 Burgers (1969) Burgers, J. M. 1969, Flow Equations for Composite Gases (New York: Academic Press)
 Cassisi et al. (2007) Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M., & Salaris, M. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1094
 Clemens (1993) Clemens, J. C. 1993, Baltic Astronomy, 2, 407
 Córsico & Althaus (2014a) Córsico, A. H. & Althaus, L. G. 2014a, A&A, 569, A106
 Córsico & Althaus (2014b) —. 2014b, ApJ, 793, L17
 Córsico et al. (2006) Córsico, A. H., Althaus, L. G., & Miller Bertolami, M. M. 2006, A&A, 458, 259
 Córsico et al. (2009a) Córsico, A. H., Althaus, L. G., Miller Bertolami, M. M., & GarcíaBerro, E. 2009a, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 172, 012075
 Córsico et al. (2009b) Córsico, A. H., Romero, A. D., Althaus, L. G., & GarcíaBerro, E. 2009b, A&A, 506, 835
 Córsico et al. (2012) Córsico, A. H., Romero, A. D., Althaus, L. G., & Hermes, J. J. 2012, A&A, 547, A96
 Cox (1968) Cox, J. P. 1968, Principles of stellar structure  Vol.1: Physical principles; Vol.2: Applications to stars
 Ferguson et al. (2005) Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 623, 585
 Fontaine & Brassard (2008) Fontaine, G. & Brassard, P. 2008, PASP, 120, 1043
 Gianninas et al. (2014) Gianninas, A., Dufour, P., Kilic, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 35
 Haft et al. (1994) Haft, M., Raffelt, G., & Weiss, A. 1994, ApJ, 425, 222
 Hansen et al. (1985) Hansen, C. J., Winget, D. E., & Kawaler, S. D. 1985, ApJ, 297, 544
 Hermes et al. (2013a) Hermes, J. J., Montgomery, M. H., Gianninas, A., et al. 2013a, MNRAS, 436, 3573
 Hermes et al. (2013b) Hermes, J. J., Montgomery, M. H., Winget, D. E., et al. 2013b, ApJ, 765, 102
 Hermes et al. (2012) —. 2012, ApJ, 750, L28
 Iglesias & Rogers (1996) Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943
 Istrate et al. (2014) Istrate, A. G., Tauris, T. M., & Langer, N. 2014, A&A, 571, A45
 Itoh et al. (1996) Itoh, N., Hayashi, H., Nishikawa, A., & Kohyama, Y. 1996, ApJS, 102, 411
 Kawaler (1993) Kawaler, S. D. 1993, ApJ, 404, 294
 Kawaler et al. (1986) Kawaler, S. D., Winget, D. E., Hansen, C. J., & Iben, Jr., I. 1986, ApJ, 306, L41
 Kepler et al. (2007) Kepler, S. O., Kleinman, S. J., Nitta, A., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1315
 Kepler et al. (2015) Kepler, S. O., Pelisoli, I., Koester, D., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 4078
 Kilic et al. (2011) Kilic, M., Brown, W. R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 3
 Kilic et al. (2012) —. 2012, ApJ, 751, 141
 Kilic et al. (2015) Kilic, M., Hermes, J. J., Gianninas, A., & Brown, W. R. 2015, MNRAS, 446, L26
 Kleinman et al. (2013) Kleinman, S. J., Kepler, S. O., Koester, D., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 5
 Koester et al. (2009) Koester, D., Voss, B., Napiwotzki, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 441
 Lee & Bradley (1993) Lee, U. & Bradley, P. A. 1993, ApJ, 418, 855
 Magni & Mazzitelli (1979) Magni, G. & Mazzitelli, I. 1979, A&A, 72, 134
 Maxted et al. (2011) Maxted, P. F. L., Anderson, D. R., Burleigh, M. R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1156
 Maxted et al. (2014) Maxted, P. F. L., Serenelli, A. M., Marsh, T. R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 208
 Maxted et al. (2013) Maxted, P. F. L., Serenelli, A. M., Miglio, A., et al. 2013, Nature, 498, 463
 Mukadam et al. (2006) Mukadam, A. S., Montgomery, M. H., Winget, D. E., Kepler, S. O., & Clemens, J. C. 2006, ApJ, 640, 956
 Nelson et al. (2004) Nelson, L. A., Dubeau, E., & MacCannell, K. A. 2004, ApJ, 616, 1124
 Panei et al. (2007) Panei, J. A., Althaus, L. G., Chen, X., & Han, Z. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 779
 Rohrmann et al. (2012) Rohrmann, R. D., Althaus, L. G., GarcíaBerro, E., Córsico, A. H., & Miller Bertolami, M. M. 2012, A&A, 546, A119
 Saio (2013) Saio, H. 2013, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 43, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, 5005
 Saio et al. (1983) Saio, H., Winget, D. E., & Robinson, E. L. 1983, ApJ, 265, 982
 Sarna et al. (2000) Sarna, M. J., Ergma, E., & GerškevitšAntipova, J. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 84
 Shibahashi (2013) Shibahashi, H. 2013, in EAS Publications Series, Vol. 63, EAS Publications Series, ed. G. Alecian, Y. Lebreton, O. Richard, & G. Vauclair, 185–190
 Steinfadt et al. (2010) Steinfadt, J. D. R., Bildsten, L., & Arras, P. 2010, ApJ, 718, 441
 Steinfadt et al. (2012) Steinfadt, J. D. R., Bildsten, L., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 1
 Tassoul et al. (1990) Tassoul, M., Fontaine, G., & Winget, D. E. 1990, ApJS, 72, 335
 Tremblay et al. (2011) Tremblay, P.E., Bergeron, P., & Gianninas, A. 2011, ApJ, 730, 128
 Tremblay et al. (2015) Tremblay, P.E., Gianninas, A., Kilic, M., et al. 2015, ArXiv eprints
 Unno et al. (1989) Unno, W., Osaki, Y., Ando, H., Saio, H., & Shibahashi, H. 1989, Nonradial oscillations of stars, ed. T. University of Tokyo Press
 Van Grootel et al. (2012) Van Grootel, V., Dupret, M.A., Fontaine, G., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A87
 Van Grootel et al. (2013) Van Grootel, V., Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., & Dupret, M.A. 2013, ApJ, 762, 57
 Weiss & Ferguson (2009) Weiss, A. & Ferguson, J. W. 2009, A&A, 508, 1343
 Winget & Kepler (2008) Winget, D. E. & Kepler, S. O. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 157