Protocols for dynamically probing topological edge states and dimerization with fermionic atoms in optical potentials

Protocols for dynamically probing topological edge states and dimerization with fermionic atoms in optical potentials

Mekena Metcalf School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA    Chen-Yen Lai School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA    Kevin Wright Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, USA    Chih-Chun Chien School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA
Abstract

Topological behavior has been observed in quantum systems including ultracold atoms. However, background harmonic traps for cold-atoms hinder direct detection of topological edge states arising at the boundary because the distortion fuses the edge states into the bulk. We propose experimentally feasible protocols to probe localized edge states and dimerization of ultracold fermions. By confining cold-atoms in a ring lattice and changing the boundary condition from periodic to open using an off-resonant laser sheet to cut open the ring, topological edge states can be generated. A lattice in a topological configuration can trap a single particle released at the edge as the system evolves in time. Alternatively, depleting an initially filled lattice away from the boundary reveals the occupied edge states. Signatures of dimerization in the presence of contact interactions can be found in selected correlations as the system boundary suddenly changes from periodic to open and exhibit memory effects of the initial state distinguishing different configurations.

pacs:
67.85.-d, 71.10.Fd, 03.65.Vf

Emergent condensed matter phenomena arising from topological behavior has incited increasing attention. For instance, topological insulators can host edge states within an insulating energy gap and are characterized by topological invariants arising from their band structures Asbóth et al. (2015); Shen (2012); Chiu et al. (2016); Qi and Zhang (2011); Hasan and Kane (2010). The versatility of ultracold atoms for simulating many-body systems Chien et al. (2015); Bloch et al. (2012) leads to realizations of important topological systems such as the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model Atala et al. (2013), Harper-Hofstadter Hamiltonian Miyake et al. (2013); Aidelsburger et al. (2013), and the elusive Haldane model Jotzu et al. (2014). Topological structures also support unique dynamical features realizable with cold atoms such as quantized charge transport Nakajima et al. (2016); Lohse et al. (2016).

The SSH model has been constructed with an optical superlattice in a confining potential to probe quantum phases Atala et al. (2013). It supports nontrivial band topology with sublattice symmetry and localized edge states when the system is uniform. Direct detection of edge states, however, has been hindered by the confining potential, which distorts the density profile and prevents a sharp boundary.There have been proposals for observing topological edge modes in 2D cold-atom systems Goldman et al. (2013). Here, an alternate setup in 1D with well defined boundaries, where edge states can be generated and detected, is proposed. Rather than confining atoms in a harmonic trap, we propose that they be confined in an dimerized ring lattice formed by a patterned optical dipole trap. If the tunneling between a selected pair of sites is turned off, the ring is effectively cut open, resulting in a one dimensional lattice with open boundary conditions as illustrated in Figure 1(a). This system could be realized with some adaptation of current “Fermi gas microscope” experiments Müller (2011); Parsons et al. (2015); Cheuk et al. (2015), which we will describe below.

Figure 1: (a) Trapping set up with optical ring lattice cut with an off resonant laser sheet (yellow) to open boundaries. The lattice has unit cell with two sites A (red square) and B (blue circle). Density profile for a half-filled lattice with sites, half filling, , and interaction strength (b) and (c) .

Cutting open the ring lattice will generate localized edge states in real space, but additional methods are needed to distinguish these occupied edge states from the background of particles in other states. For example, the density profile of a half-filled, open lattice is featureless both for noninteracting and interacting systems, as shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). We propose to detect the edge states using two specific dynamical protocols: an injection method and a depletion method. A single fermion injected at the edge of an empty open lattice with nontrivial topology does not fully spread out as time evolves, because most of its weight is kept by the localized state at the edge. A recent experiment used a similar idea, injecting bosons onto the boundary of a lattice constructed in momentum space Meier et al. (2016). Our proposal is a real-space counterpart of this experiment. Another way to probe the edge states is to dynamically remove atoms Chern et al. (2014). Removing atoms from the region near the edge over time depletes most of the states except the edge states localized at the boundary, allowing them to be distinguished from the bulk states.

Noninteracting topological systems have been quite thoroughly characterized, but identifying and characterizing topological properties in interacting systems remains a great challenge Chiu et al. (2016). Topological invariants, calculated from the single-particle wavefunction, are more difficult to evaluate for many-body states. While some invariants can be calculated by Green’s functions in the thermodynamic limit Manmana et al. (2012); Volovik (2003), cold-atom systems are usually of finite size and require more direct characterization. A half-filled SSH model with an even number of sites has particle-hole symmetry, and has been shown to remain topological in the presence of interactions Hatsugai (2006); Guo and Shen (2011). A global topological number may also be determined by adding a phase twist to the boundary and analyzing the phase change when interactions are present Guo and Shen (2011); Hirano et al. (2008); Guo (2015). However, the structure of many-body topological edge states remains elusive.

Instead of mapping out the edge state in interacting systems, we propose analyzing selected correlation functions for revealing the dimerized structures in the SSH model with interactions. We found that that finite correlations will survive across a broken link in a ring lattice after a boundary is created by inserting a laser sheet. The evolution of spin-spin correlations can thus distinguish between trivial and nontrivial topological configurations with and without interactions.

Theoretical Background: The SSH model describes a one-dimensional (1D) dimerized lattice with alternating hopping strengths Asbóth et al. (2015); Shen (2012). The 1D chain hosts two sites (A and B) in each unit cell. The Hamiltonian of an -site noninteracting system is

(1)

Here represents the creation (annihilation) operator on site . The hopping coefficients alternate with and as shown in Figure 1(a). Depending on the boundary condition, the hopping between site and site is present (for periodic boundary condition) or absent (for open boundary condition). The unit of time is set by the intra-cell hopping coefficient and . We first consider a periodic system and by taking a Fourier transform of the creation (annihilation) operators, and , the Hamiltonian in momentum space is with The lattice constant serves as the length unit and the momentum summation is over the first Brillouin zone. The matrix can be diagonalized yielding the energy dispersion . A gap opens between the upper and lower bands in the bulk when .

Topological insulators can be classified according to their symmetries Chiu et al. (2016); Shen (2012); Qi and Zhang (2011). The SSH model has chiral (sublattice) symmetry with an associated topological invariant called the winding number defined for systems with periodic boundary condition. takes values of depending on whether or , revealing the parameters of the Hamiltonian wrap around a point counterclockwise (clockwise) in the parameter space. For systems with open boundary condition, zero-energy edge states localized at the boundary can emerge depending on the configuration. The bulk-boundary correspondence Asbóth et al. (2015); Qi and Zhang (2011); Hasan and Kane (2010) states that the number of edge modes is determined by the bulk topological invariant.

Here we propose measuring consequences of band topology by probing the topological edge states. An open boundary introduces an interface between the topological SSH chain and the topologically trivial vacuum, so edge modes can emerge if the configuration is suitable. Location of the edge states on sublattice A (sublattice B) depends on the condition () and sign of the associated winding number. For instance, in a long chain with one end ending with a link and , the probability amplitude of an edge state has the form

(2)

and it localizes on sublattice A at the boundary. is a normalization factor. Similarly, an end with a link with can support an edge state with similar structures on the B sublattice (but with in the power series). Therefore, for a chain with odd number of sites, one edge state is guaranteed and its location depends on the ratio of . For a chain with even number of sites, there can be zero or two edge states. For instance, an open chain ending with links on both sides and supports an edge state on both sublattices, and the two modes hybridize to give one symmetric and one anti-symmetric edge mode. On the contrary, the same chain with yields no zero-energy edge states. For a ring lattice, an even number of sites is a natural setting before a laser sheet cuts it open, so we will refer to the case with two edge states after it is cut open as the topologically nontrivial and the one with no edge state as the topologically trivial. It is possible, however, to generate a ring with an odd number of lattices Lee and III (2014); Kumar et al. (2016).

In cold-atom experiments, usually accompanying the alternating hopping in superlattices is the addition of alternating onsite energies, which adds a term to the Hamiltonian Atala et al. (2013). The edge-state configuration is still maintained in the presence of alternating onsite energies as one can verify directly, although the edge-state energy is shifted by . For quantized charge pumping of particles Shen (2012); Nakajima et al. (2016); Lohse et al. (2016), this addition of alternating onsite energies is essential because the edge states will fuse into the bulk Bermudez et al. (2009) as the crossing happens when they are tuned dynamically. Furthermore, can be tuned to zero Atala et al. (2013), so for simplicity we do not include the alternating onsite energy in our discussion.

Experimental Challenges and Proposed Solutions: Alternating onsite energies do not destroy the edge states, but a confining harmonic trap can be detrimental to them. A harmonic confining trap, with , keeps atoms in the optical setup, but it has been shown that if , the energy gap of a dimerized lattice closes due to distortion of the density profile and the edge states fuse into the bulk of the lattice Atala et al. (2013). When is large the potential takes the form of a box potential with well defined boundary. Three dimensional box potentials created by intersecting a hollow tube beam with two sheet beams provide sharp boundaries Gaunt et al. (2013), but adding lattice potential on top of the box potential can be more challenging.

Figure 2: (a) Density of the left-most site for a 60-site lattice with one fermion initially place on left boundary. The topologically nontrivial case (red, ) has an edge mode retaining the injected particle while the injected fermion propagates away in the topologically trivial case (black, ). (b) - (e) Evolution of the density profiles of a -site lattice with a depletion beam removing particles near the center of the system (). The density profiles at selected times (from top to bottom) are shown. The elements and for all are wiped out every . (b) and (c): The topologically nontrivial configuration (, labeled ”NT”) displays prominent localized edge-state structures with higher density at the two open ends as the overall density is depleted. (d) and (e): No localized structures emerge in the topologically trivial configuration (, labeled ”T”). The insets of (b) and (d) show the density profiles of the first five sites at the boundary.

We propose a method for confining the atoms in a ring lattice cut with a laser sheet to open the boundary Figure 1(a). The appearance of edge states depends on where the link is cut. If and the laser sheet cuts a strong link, , two edge states emerge along with further correlation effects. The laser sheet may introduce an energy shift on nearby sites. Assuming a shift of on the boundary site, the edge mode wavefunction (2) starts acquiring values on those sites originally with zero amplitude. The edge mode survives in a chain with length less than . Making the laser sheet sharper to reduce the shift of onsite energy near the boundary will help the edge mode be more prominent. Interestingly, when , the edge mode is completely destroyed, a result consistent with a direct mathematical evaluation Kouachi (2006). We will assume the collateral energy shift is negligible.

Dynamical Signatures in Topological Noninteracting Systems: While edge-state contribution can be measured from transport in electronic systems Hasan and Kane (2010); Qi and Zhang (2011), there is a need to develop methods to measure the edge states in cold-atom systems Chien et al. (2015). Bosonic atoms revealed characteristic edge states in momentum space using a single site injection method Meier et al. (2016). Here we found that real-space single site injection also serves as a suitable method to probe edge states. The idea is to have an empty lattice and inject a single atom onto the site at the open boundary, then the particle propagates in time. The time-evolved density profile can be monitored by evolving the correlation matrix according to the equation of motion

(3)

The initial condition is and all other elements are zero, where the first site is at the open boundary. The density on site is and can be extracted from the time-evolved correlation matrix. A fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm is used to numerically evaluate the time-evolution.

A single particle injected onto an end site not supporting an edge state propagates away, while a significant fraction of the wavefunction will be retained if there is an edge mode at the boundary. This can be understood by Eq. (2) because the edge mode has weight at the boundary site, so the injected fermion will fill the edge mode significantly. Figure 2(a) contrasts the remaining density on the injection site with and without an edge mode. For the topologically nontrivial case, the edge mode retains of the weight, which is below the upper bound. The discrepancy is mostly due to finite-size effects as well as the small local spreading of the edge mode. In contrast, the density practically vanishes as time evolves in the topologically trivial case. The remaining density thus distinguishes the trivial and non-trivial topological configurations, providing measurable evidence of edge states in real space.

The method of depletion provides another measurable evidence of topological edge states, and a similar depletion method has been considered for an optical kagome lattice Chern et al. (2014). By depleting the atoms away from the boundary over time, density of localized particles on the edge become prominent because their weights are small in the bulk. To deplete atoms, a focused laser can eject atoms from the optical trap Caliga et al. (2016). Alternatively, an electronic beam has been used to deplete bosons since, excited through collisions, atoms can escape the trap Barontini et al. (2013). We consider a uniformly filled lattice with open boundary condition as the initial state and approximate the depletion of atoms on site by removing all correlations associated with the depletion site. Interestingly, depleting with a finite removal rate is necessary, or else the depleting beam will act as a barrier preventing particle transport. Here we use a removal rate of depleting the selected correlations every , and the qualitative conclusion remains for other reasonable removal rates. Examining the density profile of topologically nontrivial configuration we find prominent occupancy at the boundary approaching the value predicted by Figure 2(b,c). The edge states are observable when the initial filling is above half-filling. The topologically trivial configuration, in contrast, exhibits diminishing edge density as shown in Figure 2(d,e). The comparison shows edge states are revealed in noninteracting systems with atom depletion away from the edge.

Figure 3: Spin-spin correlations of fermions across a suddenly broken link of a dimerized, site lattice with . The topologically nontrivial configuration (top row) supports two edge modes in the noninteracting case with open boundary condition, and the cut is across a strong link for (a,c,e). The correlations remain finite after the boundary transformation. The topologically trivial configuration (bottom row) has a cut at a weak link for increasing interactions (b,d,f). The correlations fluctuates around zero. The triangular (square) symbols show the time-independent correlation of a static configuration with periodic (open) boundary condition for the corresponding case. In all cases the system is half-filled.

Dynamical Signatures in Interacting Systems: Determining topological classification of systems with interactions is difficult. A periodic, dimerized lattice has nontrivial topological features in the presence of onsite interactions when particle-hole symmetry is respected Hatsugai (2006). Therefore, distinguishing topological features of a dimerized lattice with interactions experimentally using cold atoms is desired. Rather than probing global topological number, specific short range correlation functions will indicate nontrivial topology and dimerization structures. Correlation function dynamics is observable as the boundary is changed from periodic to open. Dynamics of some correlations have been evaluated for both trivial and nontrivial topological configurations of the noninteracting SSH model and the Kitaev chain He and Chien (2016). Importantly, correlations of density or spin can be experimentally measured using phase-contrast imaging which can distinguish between populations of each component Shin et al. (2006); Gerton et al. (2000); Liao et al. (2010).

To model the contact interaction of atoms, we use the two-component Hubbard model with onsite repulsion described by . Here is the coupling constant and () is the number operator for spin up (down) fermions. The hopping Hamiltonian, Eq. (1), is generalized to two components as well. Here the two components may be two different internal states of the same atomic species. The one-dimensional Fermi Hubbard model can be solved analytically using the Bethe-Ansatz revealing, in the thermodynamic limit, a half filled uniform lattice has a charge gap for any finite interaction Lieb and Wu (2003). As discussed previously, a dimerized lattice is a band insulator when at half-filling or full-filling, and it is a topological Mott insulating phase at half-filling when  Manmana et al. (2012). By choosing suitable correlation functions, it is possible to distinguish between the topologically nontrivial and trivial configurations in conjunction with band insulating and Mott insulating phases.

We use exact diagonalization (ED) to determine the ground state Lin et al. (1993); Sharma and Ahsan (2015) up to moderate system size and already observe prominent features in relatively small systems. If larger systems are being considered, density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method may be used White (1992, 1993); Schollwök (2005). The results presented are from a lattice with sites, and the same behavior is already observable for systems as small as sites. Dynamics of the system can be simulated efficiently by applying a Krylov-space approximation to the time evolution operator to reduce the dimension of matrix operations Manmana et al. (2005). The approximation is limited by the Hamiltonian’s spectrum width, and we compared the results against the full, exact solution of small size systems to verify the accuracy. The time evolution of correlation functions across a selected link can then be monitored.

To identify which correlation function can clearly reveal the dimerization, we investigate the equal time spin-spin correlation between the sites across the broken link (connecting sites and ):

(4)

It probes the correlations between the same spin component across the selected link. If measured across a strong (weak) link with () and , the correlation is intra-cell (inter-cell). Figure 3 shows the correlation in static configurations with open or periodic boundary condition (marked by the symbols). For the intra-dimer correlation, remains finite for both the noninteracting () and interacting () cases. In contrast, the correlation decays to zero for the topologically trivial case. The finite spin-spin correlation results from the spin singlet on the link preferred inside each dimer, but inter-dimer spin correlations should be weak because long-range spin order is forbidden in 1D Mermin and Wagner (1966) and there is no spin gap for a uniform chain in the exact solution Lieb and Wu (2003). Spin correlation within a dimer is dominated by the singlet behavior and prefers anti-parallel spins, while the spin correlation between adjacent dimers is practically random. Meaning, the spin-spin correlation function can distinguish whether an inter-cell or intra-cell link has been broken, working for both noninteracting and interacting cases.

The dynamics of correlation functions can be further explored by setting the lattice configuration initially half-filled and periodic, then changing the boundary condition by suddenly cutting and measuring correlation across a link. In isolated system like cold-atoms trapped in optical potentials, there is no external energy dissipation. As shown in Figure 3, the correlations oscillate around their average values, but the contrast between the finite correlation of the intra-cell case and the vanishing correlation of the inter-cell case persists in the time-evolution. The correlation can sometimes overshoot the equilibrium values in its time-evolution. Morevoer, the intra-cell correlation does not decay to zero and exhibits memory effects of its initial state. We mention that previous work has investigated long-range correlations in dimerized lattices by analyzing entanglement entropy Jhu et al. (2016), and the edges exhibit quantized Renyi entanglement entropy from an effective coupling of sublattices with finite size Wang et al. (2015).

The spin-spin correlations, however, do not distinguish between the (noninteracting) band and (interacting) Mott insulating phases of the dimerized lattice, and we need another correlation function to accomplish this. At half-filling, the Mott insulating phase suppresses onsite density fluctuations but the band insulating phase, formed by a pile of delocalized wavefunctions, does not. One can thus differentiate the two phases at half-filling by checking the onsite density fluctuation , which vanishes in the Mott-insulator phase Deng et al. (2015).

Experimental Implementation: These protocols for detecting edge states in dimer ring lattice potentials can be implemented by combining techniques that have already been experimentally demonstrated. Bose condensates in ring potentials have been created in numerous experiments, including some with one or more controllable “barrier” potentials. Wright et al. (2013); Ryu et al. (2013). Structured light beams suitable for creating one-dimensional ring lattices can be created using phase and amplitude modulation techniques Franke-Arnold et al. (2007); Amico et al. (2014); Lee and III (2014); Kumar et al. (2016), or using time-averaged “painted” potentials Henderson et al. (2009); Müller (2011). High-quality, stable ring lattices are probably best created using azimuthal phase imprinting techniques. These techniques are limited to producing ring lattices with even numbers of sites. If ring lattices with odd numbers of sites are to be explored as well, it may be necessary to use pure amplitude modulation techniques in a system with higher optical resolution.

Even with current “Fermi gas microscopes” Bakr et al. (2009); Müller (2011); Parsons et al. (2015), it is challenging to project a ring lattice potential where tunneling energies are sufficiently large. Using a low-mass atom such as Li may be essential for success. With azimuthal phase imprinting on a (780 nm) “ring” beam, an optical system with numerical aperture 0.6 can project a 32-site ring with lattice sites 1.4 m apart. Only a few milliwatts of optical power would be needed for a lattice depth of 5, which for Li would result in the tunneling energy 1 kHz. Here is the recoil energy. (The tunneling rate for K would be 6.6 times smaller.) With micron-scale confinement in all (azimuthal, radial, axial) directions and the ability to tune the interaction energy via Feshbach resonance, on-site interaction strengths of 0-5 are obtainable.

These protocols assume single-site detection capability, which has been demonstrated with both Li and Cheuk et al. (2015). Achieving low heating rates in a ring lattice with MHz scale trap frequencies, required for Raman sideband cooling, may be more challenging than creating a suitable potential for the main portion of the protocol. However, laser power requirements will be somewhat relaxed compared to 2D lattice experiments because of the much smaller trapping volume. We also note that site-resolved spin-sensitive (Faraday) imaging has been recently been reported (with Bosonic Yb) Yamamoto et al. (2016), and this technique might be adapted to resolve spin correlations in the proposed ring lattice.

Discussion: While solid state systems can reveal the influence of topological edge modes on transport, cold atoms can characterize topological properties directly associated with the wavefunction Chien et al. (2015). Since cold-atoms need to be confined in experiments, the confining potential distorts the density profile and hinders direct observation of topological edge modes. We propose a geometry suitable for generating edge modes in 1D by cutting open a ring lattice, and two dynamical probes for revealing the edge modes by exploiting their localized nature: One utilizes single-particle injection in real space and the other depletes the particles away from the boundary.

Identifying topological properties of the interacting SSH model received theoretical progress for determining global behavior, but experimental verification can be challenging. Evaluating the time-evolution of selected correlation functions provides a local probe of dimerization signatures and distinguishes interacting and noninteracting systems in different configurations. The setup and probes are general and should be useful for experimental verification of bulk-boundary correspondence and explore dynamics in other topological systems.

References

  • Asbóth et al. (2015) J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány,  and A. Pályi, “A short course on topological insulators:band-structure topology and edge states in one and two dimensions,”  (2015), arXiv 1509.02295, 1509.02295 .
  • Shen (2012) S.-Q. Shen, Topological Insulators: Dirac Equation in Condensed Matters, Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012).
  • Chiu et al. (2016) C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder,  and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  • Qi and Zhang (2011) X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  • Hasan and Kane (2010) M. Z. Hasan and C. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  • Chien et al. (2015) C. C. Chien, S. Peotta,  and M. Di Ventra, Nat. Phys. 11, 998 (2015).
  • Bloch et al. (2012) I. Bloch, J. Dalibard,  and S. Nascimbéne, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  • Atala et al. (2013) M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler,  and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys. 9, 795 (2013)arXiv:1212.0572 .
  • Miyake et al. (2013) H. Miyake, G. A. Siviloglou, C. J. Kennedy, W. C. Burton,  and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185302 (2013).
  • Aidelsburger et al. (2013) M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes,  and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013).
  • Jotzu et al. (2014) G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif,  and T. Esslinger, Nature 515, 237 (2014).
  • Nakajima et al. (2016) S. Nakajima, T. Tomita, S. Taie, T. Ichinose, H. Ozawa, L. Wang, M. Troyer,  and Y. Takahashi, Nat. Phys. 12, 3622 (2016).
  • Lohse et al. (2016) M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, O. Zilberberg, M. Aidelsburger,  and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys. 12, 3584 (2016).
  • Goldman et al. (2013) N. Goldman, J. Dalibard, A. Dauphin, F. Gerbier, M. Lewenstein, P. Zoller,  and I. B. Spielman, PNAS 110, 6736 (2013).
  • Müller (2011) T. Müller, Microscopic Probing and Manipulation of of Ultracold Fermions, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich (2011).
  • Parsons et al. (2015) M. F. Parsons, F. Huber, A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, W. Setiawan, K. Wooley-Brown, S. Blatt,  and M. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 213002 (2015).
  • Cheuk et al. (2015) L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, M. Okan, T. Gersdorf, V. V. Ramasesh, W. S. Bakr, T. Lompe,  and M. W. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 193001 (2015).
  • Meier et al. (2016) E. J. Meier, F. A. An,  and B. Gadway, arXiv 1609.09467 (2016).
  • Chern et al. (2014) G.-W. Chern, C.-C. Chien,  and M. D. Ventra, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013609 (2014).
  • Manmana et al. (2012) S. R. Manmana, A. M. Essin, R. M. Noack,  and V. Gurarie, Phys. Rev. B 86, 205119 (2012).
  • Volovik (2003) G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2003).
  • Hatsugai (2006) Y. Hatsugai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 45, 123601 (2006).
  • Guo and Shen (2011) H. Guo and S.-Q. Shen, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195107 (2011).
  • Hirano et al. (2008) T. Hirano, H. Katsura,  and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. B 77, 094431 (2008).
  • Guo (2015) H. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033625 (2015).
  • Lee and III (2014) J. G. Lee and W. T. H. III, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 103106 (2014).
  • Kumar et al. (2016) A. Kumar, N. Anderson, W. D. Phillips, S. Eckel, G. Campbell,  and S. Stringari, New J. Phys. 18, 025001 (2016).
  • Bermudez et al. (2009) A. Bermudez, L. Amico,  and M. A. Martin-Delgado, New J. Phys. 12, 55014 (2009).
  • Gaunt et al. (2013) A. L. Gaunt, T. F. Schmidutz, I. Gotlibovych, R. P. Smith,  and Z. Hadzibabic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200406 (2013).
  • Kouachi (2006) S. Kouachi, Electron. J. Linear. Al. (ELA) 15 (2006).
  • Caliga et al. (2016) S. C. Caliga, C. J. E. Straatsma, A. A. Zozulya, T. A. Bell, J. A. P. Glidden, L. Humbert, L. Wang, P. Zhang,  and X.-z. Chen, New J. Phys. 18, 25010 (2016).
  • Barontini et al. (2013) G. Barontini, R. Labouvie, F. Stubenrauch, A. Vogler, V. Guarrera,  and H. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 035302 (2013).
  • He and Chien (2016) Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Phys. Rev. B 94, 024308 (2016).
  • Shin et al. (2006) Y. Shin, M. Zwierlein, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek,  and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 030401 (2006).
  • Gerton et al. (2000) J. M. Gerton, D. Strekalov, I. Prodan,  and R. G. Hulet, Nature 408, 692 (2000).
  • Liao et al. (2010) Y.-A. Liao, A. S. C. Rittner, T. Paprotta, W. Li, G. B. Partridge, R. G. Hulet, S. K. Baur,  and E. J. Mueller, Nature 467, 09393 (2010).
  • Lieb and Wu (2003) E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, Physica A 321, 1 (2003).
  • Lin et al. (1993) H. Lin, J. Gubernatis, H. Gould,  and J. Tobochnik, Comput. Phys. 7, 400 (1993).
  • Sharma and Ahsan (2015) M. Sharma and M. A. H. Ahsan, Comput. Phys. Commun. 193, 19 (2015)arXiv:arXiv:1307.7542v1 .
  • White (1992) S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 19 (1992).
  • White (1993) S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 48, 14 (1993).
  • Schollwök (2005) U. Schollwök, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1 (2005).
  • Manmana et al. (2005) S. R. Manmana, A. Muramatsu,  and R. M. Noack, AIP Conf. Proc. 789, 269 (2005).
  • Mermin and Wagner (1966) N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966).
  • Jhu et al. (2016) Y.-H. Jhu, P. Chen,  and M.-C. Chung, arXiv:1610.00851  (2016).
  • Wang et al. (2015) D. Wang, S. Xu, Y. Wang,  and C. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115118 (2015).
  • Deng et al. (2015) X. Deng, C. Jia,  and C. C. Chien, Phys. Rev. B 91, 054515 (2015).
  • Wright et al. (2013) K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips,  and G. K. Campbell, Physical Review Letters 110, 025302 (2013).
  • Ryu et al. (2013) C. Ryu, P. W. Blackburn, A. A. Blinova,  and M. G. Boshier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 205301 (2013).
  • Franke-Arnold et al. (2007) S. Franke-Arnold, J. Leach, M. J. Padgett, V. E. Lembessis, D. Ellinas, a. J. Wright, J. M. Girkin, P. Ohberg,  and a. S. Arnold, Optics Express 15, 8619 (2007).
  • Amico et al. (2014) L. Amico, D. Aghamalyan, F. Auksztol, H. Crepaz, R. Dumke,  and L. C. Kwek, Sci. Rep. 4, 4298 (2014)arXiv:1304.4615 .
  • Henderson et al. (2009) K. Henderson, C. Ryu, C. MacCormick,  and M. G. Boshier, New J. Phys. 11, 043030 (2009).
  • Bakr et al. (2009) W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling,  and M. Greiner, Nature 462, 74 (2009)arXiv:0908.0174 .
  • Yamamoto et al. (2016) R. Yamamoto, J. Kobayashi, K. Kato, T. Kuno, Y. Sakura,  and Y. Takahashi, “Site-resolved imaging of single atoms with a Faraday quantum gas microscope,”  (2016), preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.07045.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
78963
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description