Probing the nuclide {}^{180}W for neutrinoless double-electron capture exploration

Probing the nuclide W for neutrinoless double-electron capture exploration

C. Droese K. Blaum M. Block S. Eliseev F. Herfurth E. Minaya Ramirez Yu. N. Novikov L. Schweikhard V. M. Shabaev I. I. Tupitsyn S. Wycech K. Zuber N. A. Zubova Institut für Physik, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, 55099 Mainz, Germany Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, 188300 St. Petersburg, Russia St. Petersburg State University, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, PL-00-681 Warsaw, Poland Institut für Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität, 01069 Dresden, Germany

PACS numbers: 07.75+h, 23.40.-s,14.60.Lm

Abstract

The mass difference of the nuclides W and Hf has been measured with the Penning-trap mass spectrometer SHIPTRAP to investigate W as a possible candidate for the search for neutrinoless double-electron capture. The -value was measured to 143.20(27) keV. This value in combination with the calculations of the atomic electron wave functions and other parameters results in a half-life of the ground-state to ground-state double-electron capture transition of approximately 5years/.

1 Introduction

One of the open questions in elementary particle physics is whether neutrinos are Majorana or Dirac particles. The answer to this question could be given by the observation of neutrinoless double-electron transformations, i.e. the double beta-particle emission, double-electron capture of orbital electrons, or a mixture of positron emission and electron capture.
Even though a resonant enhancement of neutrinoless double-electron capture was suggested long ago Win55 (); Ber83 (), only nowadays the use of Penning traps allows an assessment of different candidate nuclides Bla06 (); Bla10 (). Based on a very precise -value measurement the resonant enhancement factor Ber83 (); EliGd11 ()

(1)

can be determined to identify the most suitable candidates. In Eq. (1) is the width of the double-electron hole Cam01 () and is the degeneracy factor where represents the binding energy of the captured electron pair and is the energy of the excited state in the daughter nuclide.
Several nuclides that had been listed as candidates Fre05 () have already been probed. As an example, a recent measurement Rah09 () ruled out a resonant enhancement in Sn. An even more stringent negative result was obtained for another candidate, Se Kol10 (); Mou10 (). Subsequent Penning-trap measurements of the -values of Ru, Er, Yb, and Ce also excluded all of them from the list of suitable candidates for the experimental search for neutrinoless double-electron capture Eli11 (); Kol11 ().
More promising candidates for neutrinoless double-electron capture are systems with ground-state to ground-state transitions () Bla10 (). Their major advantage is a larger nuclear matrix element and a larger phase space compared to the ground-state to excited-state transitions. The maximum capture rate is expected if the resonant enhancement criterion is fulfilled for the capture of two K-shell electrons in heavy nuclides. Two candidates for such types of transitions, proposed in Bla10 (), have recently been explored with the Penning trap system SHIPTRAP: GdSm EliGd11 () and ErDy EliDy11 (). The estimated half-life for Gd of years/ ( is the effective Majorana neutrino mass given in electron volts) assesses this nuclide as the best candidate known to date for the search for neutrinoless double-electron capture.
The present study explores the transition of W to Hf. This isotope remains the last ground-state to ground-state transition candidate that has not been investigated before our studies. The mass difference given in the Atomic-Mass Evaluation 2003 is 144.4(45) keV Aud03 (), which is not accurate enough to evaluate the resonant enhancement factor.

2 Experimental Setup

The -value of W reported here was measured by high-precision Penning trap mass spectrometry with SHIPTRAP Blo07 (). The part of the SHIPTRAP apparatus used for the present measurements is sketched in figure 1.

Figure 1: A sketch of the SHIPTRAP setup. For details see text.

All ions were produced via laser ablation from enriched samples (W metal with 89.1% and HfO with 93.89% isotopic enrichment) on a stainless steel backing Cha07 (). The ions were guided with electrostatic lenses and a quadrupole deflector into a tandem Penning trap placed in a 7-T superconducting solenoid.
In the preparation trap possible contaminants were removed by mass-selective buffer-gas cooling Sav91 () from the ion ensemble before it was transferred to the measurement trap, where the cyclotron-frequency measurement of the ion of interest was performed. To this end the time-of-flight ion-cyclotron-resonance (ToF-ICR) technique Gra80 () was utilized to determine the cyclotron frequency with the magnetic-field strength and the ion’s charge-to-mass ratio . The charged particles were detected by a micro-channel-plate (MCP) detector. A Ramsey-excitation scheme was applied Geo07 (); Geor07 () using an excitation pattern of two radiofrequency pulses with a duration of 50 ms or 100 ms, separated by a waiting time of 900 ms or 1800 ms, respectively. An example of such a ToF-ICR resonance of W is shown in figure 2.

Figure 2: Time-of-flight ion-cyclotron-resonance of W for a Ramsey-excitation scheme with two excitation pulses of 100 ms separated by a waiting time of 1800 ms. The solid line is a fit of the expected line shape Kre07 () to the data.

To determine which is the central minimum of the Ramsey curve, the cyclotron frequency was checked regularly by a single-pulse ToF-ICR measurement with an uncertainty of about 50 mHz.
The resonances of W and Hf were taken alternately. For the frequency-ratio determination the cyclotron frequency of one nuclide was linearly interpolated to the time of the measurement of the other one. Thus, due to active stabilization systems Dro11 () any residual magnetic-field fluctuations during the short time between the resonance measurements were negligible. Due to the extremely small mass difference of the two species and the identical ion production as well as preparation mechanisms systematic uncertainties can be neglected on the present level of statistical uncertainties Rou11 (). Note that no absolute mass values are deduced from the present measurements, but only the mass difference between the two close-lying ion species. For the analysis only those events with an ion number of less or equal to 5 ions per cycle were considered in order to exclude frequency shifts due to ion-ion interactions Bol90 (). This data was split up into five different subsets according to the number of detected ions per measurement cycle. For each subset a frequency ratio was determined Kel03 (). Those ratios that showed an unreasonably high scattering for different numbers of ions were removed from the measurement.
Further details of the data analysis of -value measurements at SHIPTRAP will be given in a forthcoming publication Rou11 ().

3 Results

The resulting frequency ratios Hf/W are shown in figure 3. The error bars of the individual data points give the statistical uncertainties. The mean frequency ratio is

(2)

The -value of the decay is given by

(3)

where (Hf) is the atomic mass of the daughter nuclide and is the electron mass.
The resulting energy difference between the initial and final species of the double-electron capture transition WHf is =143.20(27) keV. The uncertainty of the -value is reduced by a factor of 17 in comparison to the old value of =144.4(45) keV deduced from the mass values given in Aud03 (). The value 131.96(1) keV for the K-shell double-electron hole binding energy was taken from Kri10 (). The degeneracy factor is calculated to be =11.24(27) keV. The width of the double-electron hole =71.8 eV has been deduced from Cam01 (). Thus, the resonance condition is not fulfilled.

Figure 3: Frequency ratios Hf/W) (points) with the average value (solid line) and the one sigma statistical uncertainty (dotted lines).

Energetically less favorable is the capture to a nuclear excited state in Hf with an energy of 93.3243(20) keV Wu03 () and a spin parity of =2. The difference between the mother and daughter states is 29.05(27) keV for the atomic shell orbitals L and L and their binding energies, 11.27 keV and 9.56 keV, respectively. Based on all these parameters the transition to the excited nuclear state is unfavorable. A partial level scheme of the daughter nuclide Hf is shown in figure 4.
The capture probability was deduced from Ber83 () and is given by

(4)

In order to estimate the product of the electron wave functions for two captured electrons and in the nucleus was determined using the one-configuration Dirac-Fock method for an extended nucleus Bra77 (). The one-electron densities of the K-shell were calculated for the ground state of neutral W at the center and the root-mean-square radius of the atomic nucleus. Then, the mean value of these densities was used in the calculation of . The characteristic value =9 for transitions between heavy nuclides was used Kri10 (). In Eq. (4) stands for the axial-vector nucleon coupling constant, is the weak coupling constant, is the Cabibbo angle and is the nuclear radius. As compared to other candidates for neutrinoless double-electron capture the absence of the energy degeneracy is partly compensated by the high values of of 3.2 and the nuclear matrix element. We estimate the half-life of W to

(5)

In Suj04 () a radiative neutrinoless double-electron capture was predicted, particular for the case of W. In a simplified description one of the electrons captured from the initial atomic state emits a photon during that capture process. The energy of the emitted photon is equal to the degeneracy factor , in which is the binding energy of captured K- and L-shell electrons. The transition probability of the process increases if the energy of the photon is equal to the energy difference of the atomic states . In this particular case, a resonant enhancement of double-electron capture occurs. Thus, the resonance condition for radiative neutrinoless double-electron capture appears when , whereas the resonance condition for the nonradiative transition analysed in this work is fulfilled when is approaching the value zero. The transition WHf was considered with the new measured value of =143.20(27) keV. With the formulas presented in Suj04 () we estimated a half-life of 4 years/.

Figure 4: Partial level scheme of the double-electron capture with the -value including the energy difference to the ground-state with the double K-shell electron binding energy 0 and the less favorable excited-state transition to the atomic shell orbitals L and L 2 of Hf in keV.

4 Summary and Conclusion

This work continued the search for a suitable candidate for a future experiment dedicated to the observation of neutrinoless double-electron capture. The focus of this work was on the investigation of the ground-state to ground-state double-electron capture in W. This transition has a rather large nuclear matrix element, and for the case of two K-shell electron captures has a high overlap of the electron wave functions. Except for the investigated nuclide only a very limited number of possible neutrinoless double-electron capture candidates, i.e. Gd and Er, fulfil these requirements. Here we measured the atomic mass differences of W and its daughter nuclide Hf resulting in a value of =143.20(27) keV. Although the obtained value does not result in an energy degeneracy of the mother and daughter states, a rather high neutrinoless double-electron capture probability with a half-life of 5 years/ is obtained. For the process of radiative neutrinoless double-electron capture Suj04 () a half-life close to this value of 410years/ was estimated. Both values lie between the results of the other two known ground-state to ground-state transition candidates, which both had already been investigated, Gd with a half-life of about years/ and Er with 1years/. The theoretical prediction from Kri10 () combined with the experimental results and the matrix element given above yields a half-live of 1.2years/.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the German BMBF (Grants 06GF186I, 06GF9103I, 06DD9054) and by the WTZ Grant RUS-07/015. E.M. thanks the Helmholtz-Institute Mainz. Yu. N. thanks EMMI for his guest professorship. Financial support by the Max-Planck Society is acknowledged. The work of V. M. S., I. I. T. and N. A. Z. was supported by RFBR (Grant No. 10-02-00450).

References


  • (1) R. Winter, Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 142
  • (2) J. Bernabeu et al., Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 15
  • (3) K. Blaum, Phys. Rep. 425 (2006) 1
  • (4) K. Blaum, Yu. N. Novikov and G. Werth, Contemp. Phys. 51 (2010) 149
  • (5) S. Eliseev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 052504
  • (6) J. Campbel and T. Papp, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 77 (2001) 1
  • (7) D. Frekers, arXiv:0506002 [hep-ex] (2005)
  • (8) S. Rahaman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 042501
  • (9) V. Kolhinen et al., Phys. Lett. B 684 (2010) 17
  • (10) B. Mount et al., Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 032501(R)
  • (11) S. Eliseev et al., Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 038501
  • (12) V. Kolhinen et al., Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011)
  • (13) S. Eliseev et al., submitted (2011)
  • (14) G. Audi et al., Nucl. Phys. A 729 (2003) 337
  • (15) M. Block et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 45 (2007) 39
  • (16) A. Chaudhuri et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 45 (2007) 47
  • (17) G. Savard et al., Phys. Lett. A 158 (1991) 247
  • (18) G. Gräff et al., Z. Phys. A 297 (1980) 35
  • (19) S. George et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 264 (2007) 110
  • (20) S. George et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 162501
  • (21) M. Kretzschmar et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 264 (2007) 122
  • (22) C. Droese et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 632 (2011) 157
  • (23) C. Roux et al., in preparation
  • (24) G. Bollen et al., J. Appl. Phys. 68 (1990) 4355
  • (25) A. Kellerbauer et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 22 (2003) 53
  • (26) M. Krivoruchenko et al., Nucl. Phys. A 859 (2011) 140
  • (27) S. Wu and H. Niu, Nucl. Data Sheets 100 (2003) 483
  • (28) V. Bratsev et al., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Ser. 41(1977) 173
  • (29) Z. Sujkowski and S. Wycech, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 052501
  • Comments 0
    Request Comment
    You are adding the first comment!
    How to quickly get a good reply:
    • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
    • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
    • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

    The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
    ""
    The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
       
    Add comment
    Cancel
    Loading ...
    152630
    This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
    Upvote
    Downvote
    ""
    The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
    The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
    Submit
    Cancel

    You are asking your first question!
    How to quickly get a good answer:
    • Keep your question short and to the point
    • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
    • Phrase it like a question
    Test
    Test description