Precision measurements of quantum defects in the nP{}_{3/2} Rydberg States of {}^{85}Rb

Precision measurements of quantum defects in the P Rydberg States of Rb

B. Sanguinetti, H. O. Majeed, M. L. Jones and B. T. H. Varcoe School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
July 14, 2019
Abstract

Rydberg States are used in our One Atom Maser experiment because they offer a large dipole moment and couple strongly to low numbers of microwave photons in a high Q cavity. Here we report the absolute frequencies of the P states for principal quantum numbers to . These measurements were made with a three step laser excitation scheme. A wavemeter was calibrated against a frequency comb to provide accurate absolute frequency measurements over the entire range, reducing the measurement uncertainty to 1MHz. We compare the spectroscopic results with known frequency measurements as a test of measurement accuracy.

pacs:
32.80.Ee, 33.80.Rv, 42.62.Fi

1 Introduction

Accurate knowledge of the excitation energies of Rydberg states is an important ingredient in increasing the accuracy of atomic structure calculations [1]. Experimentally, Rydberg atoms are also attractive because they offer a large dipole moment and a large number of closely spaced energy levels. Therefore there has been an increasing effort in the field of quantum information processing recently, where Rydberg states have been proposed for increasing the interaction strength between atoms [2, 3, 4, 5], in cavity QED schemes for quantum computing [6] and quantum optics research [7, 8].

For this experiment, the Rydberg states in Rb between and were excited using a three step laser excitation process as shown in Figure 1. The steps are a 780.24nm transition 5S, F=3 to 5P, F=4, a 775.9nm laser resonant with the 5P, F=4 to 5D, F=5 transition and finally a 1256nm laser to excite P Rydberg states. This method of excitation was preferred over a single UV step both because of the convenience and reliability of diode lasers and readily available optical fibres. The accuracy of the results was verified with a Menlo Systems frequency comb and we calculate values of the modified Rydberg-Ritz formula with significant improvements on previous results.

Figure 1: Three level excitation scheme.

During the experiment the first two laser steps are stabilised to atomic reference transitions and the frequency of the transitions are measured with a frequency comb. The first step is locked to the 5S, F=3 to 5P, F=4 transition of Rb using a polarization spectrum [9], which offers a dispersion curve without the need to modulate the laser frequency. Using the comb we determined that the locked laser linewidth is 300kHz with a 1 second Allan deviation 10kHz.

The second step laser is locked to the 5P, F=4 to 5D, F=5 transition. The locking signal is however derived from an enhanced transmission of the 1st step laser light rather than directly from the 2nd step laser. Enhanced transparency of the 1st step is used because it has a much higher signal to noise ratio at low intensities than any other signal and it therefore produces a better locking curve. The feedback signal is derived by applying a small modulation to the 2nd step and the locking curve is extracted using a lock-in amplifier. This is free from Doppler broadening because only zero Doppler class atoms are excited by the 1st step laser, which is tightly locked to the Doppler free polarization spectrum.

The third step laser is a broadly tunable ‘Stry’ design [10] diode laser. This laser has a stability of better than 1MHz over a second, can be tuned accurately by a few GHz using a low voltage piezo actuator, and by nearly 100nm with a stepper motor. This laser is scanned over the 5D, F=5 to P transition of interest by applying a voltage from a 16 bit optically isolated DAC to the piezo actuator.

Figure 2: A schematic showing the optical setup used in the 3 step excitation, including fibre optic delivery to both the diagnostic systems and the experiment itself.

The beamline consists of a room temperature vacuum chamber (mbar) in which we placed a rubidium dispenser [11], a fibre coupled excitation region and a detector consisting of a set of field ionization plates with a small electric field ramp from 20 to 30V/cm and the resulting electrons are detected with a channel electron multiplier. The lasers are launched into single mode optical fibre and passed into the vacuum using a fibre feedthrough. One single mode fibre (Nufern 780HP) carries the 1st and 2nd step lasers and a second fibre (Corning SMF28) is used for the 3rd step laser (principally because the third step requires a larger core diameter fibre). The fibres are terminated in collimating lenses that produce a 2mm diameter beam. The output of the two fibres are arranged so that they are counter-propagating but meet the atomic beam in a perpendicular direction. A useful property of the counter-propagating lasers is the ability to check correct alignment as some light from the 780/776nm fibre is coupled into the 1260nm fibre when they are correctly aligned.

Figure 3: Beamline (not to scale): The entire beamline is housed in a vacuum chamber pumped with a turbo pump and an oil-free backing pump, reaching a background pressure of mbar. The entire length is 50cm and includes a rubidium alkali metal dispenser, a shielded excitation region and field ionisation detector.

The self-referenced femtosecond frequency comb [12] was used to translate precision RF frequencies from an SRS FS725 Rubidium atomic clock to optical frequencies with an accuracy of [13] allowing direct frequency measurement with the accuracy of the RF reference to be made. The atomic clock provides an absolute frequency accuracy of better than based on the manufacturers specification of the aging rates of the oscillator. For a Hz transition this corresponds to a potential absolute error of 500kHz. The laser frequencies are measured using beat detection units that beat a closely lying comb line with the laser to be measured. The fixed frequency lasers can be simultaneously and continuously measured with this set up. To detect the frequency of the scanning third step laser we use a calibrated wavemeter. The wavemeter draws a comparison between two high finesse Fabry-Perot cavities and achieves an absolute accuracy of 60MHz. Using the frequency comb we have determined that the relative accuracy of the wavemeter, immediately following calibration, is at 780nm (the comparison wavelength). During the experiment the wavemeter was continuously calibrated against the first step laser ensuring that the absolute frequency accuracy of the wavemeter was asserted with the frequency comb. Under this condition the wavemeter was disciplined to give an absolute accuracy of 1MHz. The frequency comb was also used to calibrate the accuracy of the target measurement conditions by observing the agreement between the comb and the wavemeter in the 1260nm range. At 1260nm the accuracy had degraded a little and the precision of 1260 measurements was 4MHz. Finally spectral lines corresponding to the rubidium Rydberg transitions were acquired by scanning the 3rd step laser over a transition, and simultaneously recording the countrate and the 3rd step laser wavelength using a computer controlled data acquisition system. The experimental aim was to achieve an overall accuracy of 10MHz, as this the approximate linewidth of the transition and it is the maximum error level tolerated by the frequency comb electronics.

The excitation region is a monolithic piece of aluminium machined to include both collimating holes for the atomic beam and fibre collimators, so that the alignment was as accurate as possible. The atomic beam is created with a 2cm long Rubidium dispenser oven [11]. The entire collimated cone is therefore filled by the beam and the finite angle of this cone will result in a finite Doppler broadening. This broadening is however much smaller than the linewidth of the 1st step rubidium transition.

The stability of the 1st laser is important for this experiment because it is used to calibrate the wavemeter, and as velocity selection for the second step lock. The Allan variance of this was measured to be below 10kHz for all the times relevant to the experiment. The second step lock uses an equivalent setup. The frequencies for these lasers were measured with the comb. In this paper we chose to use the combined two photon transition frequency from [14] which is known to 8kHz.

The stability of the wavemeter was measured against the 1st step laser while the laser was locked to the 5S-5P atomic transition (780nm). The absolute accuracy of the wavemeter remains below 2MHz for a few hours (see Figure 4) which is much longer than an individual scan but shorter than the entire experimental run, the wavemeter was therefore re-calibrated every hour. This calibration translates to 4MHz accuacy on the 1260nm laser (the last recorded digit in the figures). Systematic errors in the transfer of this calibration are therefore the largest error. The wavelength of the laser is read by the computer directly and therefore all plots and fitting routines use the absolute wavemeter reading as read at the time of the experiment. Finally we determine the accuracy of the calibration by comparing the frequency of the combined transition from the 5S 5D states of 770 570 285(1)MHz which is consistent with the precision two photon measurment of Nez [14] who found 770 570 284 734(8)kHz. This demonstrates that the calibration procedure for the wavemeter was sufficient for the target accuracy.

Figure 4: Allan Deviation of the wavemeter. The data was taken over a period of twelve hours.
n 3rd step Error
(MHz) (MHz) ()
36 236496706 1007068254 2.64187 2.3
37 236666310 1007237858 2.64179 2.5
38 236821728 1007393277 2.64170 2.7
39 236964479 1007536027 2.64175 2.9
40 237095926 1007667475 2.64177 3.2
41 237217235 1007788783 2.64173 3.4
42 237329406 1007900954 2.64176 3.7
43 237433360 1008004909 2.64162 4.0
44 237529853 1008101402 2.64160 4.3
45 237619595 1008191144 2.64156 4.6
46 237703191 1008274740 2.64163 5.0
47 237781211 1008352760 2.64151 5.3
48 237854117 1008425666 2.64154 5.7
49 237922362 1008493911 2.64148 6.1
50 237986322 1008557870 2.64155 6.5
51 238046352 1008617901 2.64167 6.9
52 238102791 1008674339 2.64144 7.3
53 238155879 1008727427 2.64161 7.8
54 238205906 1008777455 2.64159 8.2
55 238253103 1008824651 2.64139 8.7
56 238297662 1008869210 2.64139 9.2
57 238339780 1008911329 2.64148 9.8
58 238379637 1008951185 2.64158 10.3
59 238417400 1008988949 2.64141 10.9
60 238453197 1009024746 2.64151 11.5
61 238487172 1009058721 2.64151 12.1
62 238519445 1009090994 2.64151 12.7
63 238550123 1009121672 2.64165 13.4

Table 1: Measured frequencies for the nP states and respective quantum defects. is measured from the centre of mass of the lower and upper states, and contains a small correction to the wavemeter calibration. The 3rd step data is reported exactly as measured.

The detector field-ionizes the atoms and detects the subsequent electrons in a channel electron multiplier. The slew rate of the field in the detector is designed to be non-state selective, thus enabling the detector to collect electrons from any neighbouring Rydberg states may have been populated by black body radiation. The dark count rate of the detector was 0.3Hz making the signal to noise ratio .

Figure 5: Typical line, with a Lorentzian fit. Here the errors indicate the uncertainty in the absolute frequency as measured by the wavemeter.
Wavemeter 4MHz
Angle 4MHz
1st step 10kHz
2nd step 500kHz
Table 2: Error estimates

These systematic errors are not correlated resulting in a total systematic error of 5.7MHz. Subsequently we present the results of a scan from to in Table 1.

The measured frequencies, together with a calculated value of the quantum defect obtained from:

(1)

are presented in table 1. The values of were obtained by adding the measured 3rd step frequency to the 5S 5D transition frequency 770 570 285(1)MHz. We scanned over each line 10 times which revealed that the results presented below are repeatable to 1MHz. The previous data from [15] is presented for comparison. The fitting procedure is explained in detail below and includes Rydberg transitions from [15] for the transitions outside of the range of this experiment. Some re-analysis was required for the older data to take into account the changes in the recommended Rydberg constant (using ref. [16] and ref. [17]) since the publication of the previous paper. From these results we obtain the fit results in table 3.

Figure 6: Quantum defects

2 Analysis

Owing to subtleties in the fitting process that lead to subtle changes in the fitting parameters (see Table 3), three methods are used to analyse the data.

Method 1: The first method uses a simple fit routine. The quantum defect can be obtained as a function of if we approximate by [18]:

(2)

in which case the equation can be fitted directly, results are shown in Table 3 (Method 1). The fitting constants obtained in this way lose their physical meaning [1] owing to differences in the fitting procedures. This means that the fitting parameters obtained in this manner cannot be directly compared across experiments.

However, these fitting parameters can be substituted into

(3)

to obtain approximate values of the energies across the manifold.

Method 2: To align this analysis with that of Lorenzen and Niemax [15] the second method is an iterative fit involving first equation 2 to obtain an accurate value of the ionization energy and then substituting this value as a fixed parameter in a subsequent fit of equation 3 . This method yields the results shown in Table 3 (Method 2) and Figure 6.

Previous experiments [15, 19] were not sufficient to resolve a discrepancy between these two fitting methods, but the increased accuracy of the current experiment exposed a one standard deviation offset, making the precise definition of the fit more important. Drake [1] discusses, in detail, the advantage of each method together with the physics that can be learned from more accurate measurements of the quantum defect, thus there is some merit in considering a method of extracting the fit parameters from the data directly.

Method 3: The final and most accurate method is a fit using the absolute values of the measured transitions. A direct fit to the data is possible with a Modified Rydberg-Ritz formula obtained by expanding the effective quantum number as follows:

(4)
(5)

This creates an “extended Rydberg-Ritz formula” that can be rearranged to give the quantum defect :

(6)

where

This is convenient as it allows the energy of the transitions to be extracted more accurately and extrapolated to all other principal quantum numbers . As the principle quantum number increases, the energy approaches the ionization energy , making a very small number and the series quickly converges [20, 21, 22]. Moreover, it is possible to fit the equations using an iterative procedure and the result of this fit is shown in Table 3 (Method 3). It is important to note that due to the small number of data-points within each Lorentzian, the usage of an accurate and numerically stable fitting routine is critical. Here we use the MINPACK set of algorithms [23] (a modified Levemberg-Marquardt algorithm [24]) initialized by accurate heuristics. The accuracy and stability of this fitting procedure was checked by fitting simulated data and compared very favorably against the nonlinear fitting and minimization algorithms present in commercial software packages. We put considerable effort in obtaining high quality experimental data (high signal to noise ratio and low dark count rate, as shown in Figure 5) which eliminates any ambiguity in the fitting. Algorithms built around MINPACK were also used for fitting and minimization of the quantum defect in Equations 2 and 6; although here the other algorithms also provided sufficient quality and stability.

Method 1 Method 2 Method 3
1010024692(7) 1010024692(7) 1010024700(7)
2.641352 2.64149(1) 2.64157(2)
a 0.4822 0.317(3) 0.304(4)
b -2.86 -7.45(5) 1.15(5)
c 11.3 1.9(2) 1.2(2)
Table 3: Result comparison using three different fitting methods: Method 1 uses Equation 2 exclusively. Method 2 uses found by fitting Equation 2 as a constant in Equation 3. Method 3 uses Equation 3 exclusively. is quoted in MHz. The errors stated include systematic uncertainties.

3 Conclusion

We have presented a precision measurement of the to P Rydberg levels of Rb. We have analysed these results and found that we have made a significant improvement on the knowledge of the Modified Rydberg Ritz formula for Rb P-states. The results represent an order of magnitude improvement in the predictive capability for the P rubidium Rydberg state and we obtain an improved ionisation energy of =1 010 024 700(7)MHz compared with = 1 010 024 684(90)MHz from reference [15] and = 1 010 025GHz from reference [25].

4 References

References

  • [1] G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson. Quantum defects and the 1/n dependence of Rydberg energies: Second-order polarization effects. Physical Review A, 44(9):5448, November 1991.
  • [2] Igor I. Ryabtsev, Denis B. Tretyakov, and Ilya I. Beterov. Stark-switching technique for fast quantum gates in Rydberg atoms. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 36(2):297–306, 2003.
  • [3] Thad G. Walker and M. Saffman. Consequences of Zeeman degeneracy for the van der Waals blockade between Rydberg atoms. Physical Review A (Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics), 77(3), 2008.
  • [4] Thad G. Walker and Mark Saffman. Zeros of Rydberg-Rydberg Föster interactions. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 38(2):S309–S319, 2005.
  • [5] D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin. Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms. Physical Review Letters, 85(10):2208, 2000.
  • [6] P. J. Blythe and B. T. H. Varcoe. A cavity-QED scheme for cluster-state quantum computing using crossed atomic beams. New Journal of Physics, 8(10):231, 2006.
  • [7] Herbert Walther, Benjamin T. H. Varcoe, Berthold G. Englert, and Thomas Becker. Cavity quantum electrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics, 69(5):1325–1382, 2006.
  • [8] Serge Haroche and Jean-Michel Raimond. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (Oxford Graduate Texts). Oxford University Press, USA, October 2006.
  • [9] C. P. Pearman, C. S. Adams, S. G. Cox, P. F. Griffin, D. A. Smith, and I. G. Hughes. Polarization spectroscopy of a closed atomic transition: applications to laser frequency locking. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 35(24):5141–5151, 2002.
  • [10] Stry, S., Thelen, S., Sacher, J., Halmer, D., Hering, P., Murtz, and M. Widely tunable diffraction limited 1000 mW external cavity diode laser in Littman/Metcalf configuration for cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Applied Physics B, 85(2-3):365–374, November 2006.
  • [11] Timothy M. Roach and Dwayne Henclewood. Novel rubidium atomic beam with an alkali dispenser source. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, 22(6):2384–2387, 2004.
  • [12] Th Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hansch. Optical frequency metrology. Nature, 416(6877):233–237, March 2002.
  • [13] Philipp Kubina, Peter Adel, Florian Adler, Gesine Grosche, Theodor Hänsch, Ronald Holzwarth, Alfred Leitenstorfer, Burghard Lipphardt, and Harald Schnatz. Long term comparison of two fiber based frequency comb systems. Opt. Express, 13(3):904–909, February 2005.
  • [14] F. Nez, F. Biraben, R. Felder, and Y. Millerioux. Optical frequency determination of the hyperfine components of the 5S-5 two-photon transitions in rubidium. Optics Communications, 102:432–438, October 1993.
  • [15] C. J. Lorenzen and K. Niemax. Quantum Defects of the n2P Levels in 39K I and 85Rb I. Physica Scripta, 27(4):300–305, 1983.
  • [16] Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, and David B. Newell. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(2), 2008.
  • [17] A. H. Wapstra, G. Audi, and C. Thibault. The Ame2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation (II). Tables, Graphs and References. Nucl. Phys. A, 729:337, 2003.
  • [18] W. C. Martin. Series formulas for the spectrum of atomic sodium (Na I). J. Opt. Soc. Am., 70(7):784, July 1980.
  • [19] Dieter Meschede. Centimeter-wave spectroscopy of highly excited rubidium atoms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 4(3):413, March 1987.
  • [20] A. Sommerfeld. Allgemeine spektroskopische Gesetze, insbesondere ein magnetooptischer Zerlegungssatz. Annalen der Physik, 368(19):221–263, 1920.
  • [21] D. R. Hartree. The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24(01):89–110, 2008.
  • [22] R. M. Langer. A Generalization of the Rydberg Formula. Physical Review, 35(6):649, March 1930.
  • [23] J. J. Moré, B. S. Garbow, and K. E. Hillstrom. User Guide for MINPACK-1. ANL-80-74, Argonne National Laboratory, 1980.
  • [24] Donald W. Marquardt. An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2):431–441, 1963.
  • [25] I Johansson. Spectra of the alkali metals in the lead sulfide region. Ark. Fys., (20):135, 1961.
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
224265
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description