Polarisation properties of Milky-Way-like galaxies

Polarisation properties of Milky-Way-like galaxies

X. H. Sun Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
wreich@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
   W. Reich Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
wreich@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
22email: xiaohui.sun@sydney.edu.auNational Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Jia-20 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China
Received / Accepted
Key Words.:
Polarisation – Radio continuum: general – ISM: magnetic fields
Abstract

Context:

Aims:We study the polarisation properties, magnetic field strength, and synchrotron emission scale-height of Milky-Way-like galaxies in comparison with other spiral galaxies.

Methods:We use our 3D-emission model of the Milky Way Galaxy for viewing the Milky Way from outside at various inclinations as spiral galaxies are observed. We analyse these Milky Way maps with techniques used to obtain the strength of magnetic fields, rotation measures (RMs), and scale-heights of synchrotron emission from observations of resolved galaxies and compare the results with the Milky Way model parameter. We also simulate a large sample of unresolved Milky-Way-like galaxies to study their statistical polarisation properties.

Results:When seen edge-on the synchrotron emission from the Milky Way has an exponential scale-height of about 0.74 kpc, which is much smaller than the values obtained from previous models. We find that current analysis methods overestimate the scale-height of synchrotron emission of galaxies by about 10% at an inclination of and about 40% at an inclination of because of contamination from the disk. The observed RMs for face-on galaxies derived from high-frequency polarisation measurements approximate to the Faraday depths (FDs) when scaled by a factor of two. For edge-on galaxies, the observed RMs are indicative of the orientation of the large-scale magnetic field, but are not well related with the FDs. Assuming energy equipartition between the magnetic field and particles for the Milky Way results in an average magnetic-field strength, which is about two times larger than the intrinsic value for a factor of 100. The number distribution of the integrated polarisation percentages of a large sample of unresolved Milky-Way-like galaxies peaks at about 4.2% at 4.8 GHz and at about 0.8% at 1.4 GHz. Integrated polarisation angles rotated by align very well with the position angles of the major axes, implying that unresolved galaxies do not have intrinsic RMs.

Conclusions: Simulated maps of the Milky Way Galaxy when viewed from outside at various inclination angles are the basis for a comparison with spiral galaxy maps. They are also helpful to check the accuracy of analysing methods of spiral galaxy observations. Unresolved Milky-Way-like galaxies are ideal background sources to investigate intergalactic magnetic fields. However, at 1.4 GHz they are typically polarised below about 1% and hence a high instrumental purity of future facilities such as the SKA is required to observed them.

1 Introduction

Understanding the role of the magnetic field in spiral galaxies requires to measure its properties and relation to other components of the interstellar medium. The small-scale magnetic fields of the Milky Way Galaxy can be studied in detail. However, properties of the large-scale field are difficult to recover, since the Solar System is located within the disk.

Rotation measures (RMs) of polarised background sources are important probes of the large-scale regular magnetic fields in the Milky Way (e.g. Brown et al. 2003, 2007; Taylor et al. 2009; Van Eck et al. 2011). To obtain a very dense grid of RMs is the major aim of the Magnetism Key Science Project (Beck & Gaensler 2004) to be carried out with the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and the various pathfinder telescopes such as ASKAP (Johnston et al. 2007) at around 1.4 GHz. At this frequency, however, intrinsic polarisation properties of the various classes of background sources are poorly understood. Recently, Stil et al. (2009) investigated 23 resolved nearby spiral galaxies observed at 4.8 GHz and made a geometric model of the magnetic field to predict the statistical polarisation properties of unresolved galaxies at 1.4 GHz. Simulations with more realistic models are needed to achieve a better insight into the problem.

Polarisation observations have also been widely used to study magnetic fields of resolved nearby galaxies (see Beck 2005 for a review). RMs are usually obtained from polarisation measurements at short wavelengths, such as 3.6 cm and 6 cm, and are believed to indicate the intrinsic galaxy properties. Examples are the low-inclination galaxy NGC 6946 (Beck 2007) and the nearly edge-on galaxy NGC 253 (Heesen et al. 2009). Here it has been presumed that galaxies are optically thin for polarized emission at these wavelengths. However, we have recently found from the Sino-German 6 cm polarisation survey of the Galactic plane (Sun et al. 2011), that the polarisation horizon is about 4 kpc towards the very inner Galaxy at 6 cm, just a small portion of the Galaxy. This motivates us to investigate whether RM maps of nearby galaxies correctly show the intrinsic RMs of galaxies.

The Milky Way Galaxy is a typical spiral galaxy, whose magnetic fields have been extensively studied by RMs of pulsars (e.g. Han et al. 2006; Noutsos et al. 2008) and extragalactic sources as mentioned above, as well as by total intensity and polarisation all-sky surveys (e.g. Wolleben et al. 2006; Testori et al. 2008; Page et al. 2007). By taking into account all relevant radio observations available, Sun et al. (2008) and Sun & Reich (2010) proposed 3D-emission models of the Galaxy. Although many parameters need to be refined, the models are the most robust today as they agree with of the observations of RMs of extragalactic sources, the all-sky total intensity map at 408 MHz (Haslam et al. 1982), the polarisation map at 22.8 GHz (Gold et al. 2011), and the WMAP thermal emission template (Gold et al. 2009).

Based on the 3D-emission models, we mimic nearby Milky-Way-like galaxies by moving the Galaxy away to any distances and rotate it by arbitrary values. The large sample of simulated Milky-Way-like galaxies allows us to study the statistical properties of their integrated polarisation. We also checked whether the standard assumption of energy equipartition is relevant to estimate the strength of the average magnetic field, and to what extent the inclination of a galaxy affects the determination of its scale-height.

The paper is organised as follows: the simulations of the Milky Way Galaxy and its edge-on view are described in Sect. 2, RMs, scale-height, and energy equipartition for resolved galaxies are investigated in Sect. 3–5. The integrated polarisation properties of a large sample of unresolved Milky-Way-like galaxies are studied in Sect. 6. We summarise our results in Sect. 7.

2 Simulations

2.1 Galactic 3D-emission models

Details of the Galactic 3D-emission models used in this paper were presented by Sun et al. (2008) and Sun & Reich (2010). These models are the basis for the current investigations. They are able to reproduce the large-scale sky distribution of RMs of extragalactic sources as well as total intensity and polarisation all-sky surveys available at several frequencies.

The magnetic field is separated into a large-scale regular field and an isotropic random field. The regular field consists of a disk and a halo component. The halo field is toroidal with opposite signs below and above the Galactic plane. The configuration of the disk field can be either axi-symmetric plus reversals following either concentric rings (ASS+RING) or the spiral arms (ASS+ARM), or bi-symmetric. Recent observations of numerous RMs in the Galactic plane by Van Eck et al. (2011) favor the ASS+RING field configuration, which will be used for the present simulations. The local regular magnetic field strength is 2 G and its scale-height is 1 kpc. The strength of the random field is 3 G elsewhere.

The 3D-model of the thermal electron density we used is NE2001 (Cordes & Lazio 2002). However, it is essential to adopt the recently revised scale-height of the diffuse ionised gas by Gaensler et al. (2008), otherwise unrealistic parameters result as discussed by Sun et al. (2008). We therefore increased the scale-height of the thick disk component in NE2001 from 1 kpc to 1.83 kpc and changed the midplane thermal electron density from  cm to  cm. More details were discussed by Sun & Reich (2010). For viewing the Milky Way Galaxy from outside, we removed all individual features such as clumps and voids included in the NE2001 model. The scale-height of the cosmic-ray electron density was set to 0.8 kpc, and the local density was taken as  cm. We briefly summarise the main model parameters used for simulations in the present paper in Table 1 and refer for details like spatial variations to Sun et al. (2008) and Sun & Reich (2010).

regular disk magnetic field ASS+RING
 kpc,  kpc
local field strength: 2G
regular halo magnetic field toroidal, asymmetry with plane
maximum strength: 2G
random magnetic fields homogeneous, strength: 3G
cosmic-ray electron density  kpc,  kpc,
thermal electron density NE2001 modified
 kpc for thick disk
volume of the galaxy 40 kpc40 kpc10 kpc
111: scale-height, : radial scale-length, : energy spectral index which can be related to the spectral index of synchrotron emission as (, with being the intensity).
Table 1: Model parameters.

In our Milky Way model, we took the observed local synchrotron emission enhancement into account, which in turn reduced the large extent of the thick disk of previous models (e.g. Phillipps et al. 1981; Beuermann et al. 1985) to account for the observed emission at high latitudes. These earlier models were solely based on the all-sky 408 MHz map and the local synchrotron enhancement was not established at that time. The problem is that available low-frequency absorption data from optically thick H II regions (e.g. Nord et al. 2006; Roger et al. 1999), summarised by Fleishman & Tokarev (1995), did not constrain the 3D-structure of the local enhancement very well. However, meanwhile there are more arguments against the existence of an extended intensive thick disk of the Milky Way. The low percentage polarisation of the WMAP K-band (22.8 GHz) map (Gold et al. 2011) requires a dominating random magnetic field. However, the regular magnetic field is constrained to a few G by the RMs of extragalactic sources at high latitudes. This in turn means a significant reduction of the cosmic-ray electron density to account for the observed high-latitude synchrotron emission, which requires to suppress cosmic-ray electron diffusion out of the plane.

The local emission enhancement was modelled as a synchrotron spheroid with uniform emissivity of 1 kpc radius, centered at , with 560 pc distance from the Solar System (Sun & Reich 2010). It is realised in the models by an enhanced cosmic-ray electron density, though one can equally achieve the same result by increasing the local random magnetic fields (Sun et al. 2008). We kept the local enhancement, which has no influence on the global intensity distribution of the galaxies, as a mark of the position of the Solar System.

2.2 Realisation of galaxies from the Milky Way Galaxy

The simulations were performed with the HAMMURABI code (Waelkens et al. 2009). We revised the code to enable simulations of galaxies in a Cartesian coordinate system besides the standard HEALPix system (Górski et al. 2005).

Figure 1: Rotation of the Galaxy from -coordinates to -coordinates.

To mimic a nearby spiral galaxy, the Galaxy was put at , and at a distance , and then rotated by Euler angles . The process is explained in Fig. 1, where a galaxy at is rotated to . The origin of both coordinate systems corresponds to the centre of the galaxy, and or indicate the mid-plane of the disk of the galaxy. The Sun is located at  kpc, and . The rotation is accomplished in three steps,

  • around by ;

  • around new (green line in Fig. 1) by ;

  • around by .

The inclination () of the new Milky-Way-like galaxy is determined by and as,

(1)

where , and . In the simulations presented in this paper, we set , . The inclination angle of the galaxy is then simplified as .

3 Scale-height of the synchrotron emission

3.1 The scale-height of the Milky Way

We simulated the synchrotron emission of the Milky Way Galaxy when seen edge-on at a distance of 5 Mpc. The sampling was chosen to be to ensure that averaging effects are small. The total intensity of the Milky Way Galaxy seen edge-on at 408 MHz is significantly different from that modelled by Phillipps et al. (1981, their Fig. 8) and Beuermann et al. (1985, their Fig. 9) on the basis of only the 408 MHz all-sky survey (Haslam et al. 1982). The high-latitude emission was attributed to a thick disk component. Phillipps et al. (1981) obtained a huge halo extending in up to about 10 kpc, and Beuermann et al. (1985) obtained a slightly smaller value. We show an edge-on view of the Beuermann et al. (1985) model in comparison with ours in Fig. 2, where the present -extent is about a factor of two smaller. This difference results from the fact that the current simulations took into account the observed local synchrotron excess as reviewed in Sect. 2.1.

Figure 2: Edge-on view of the Milky Way Galaxy at 408 MHz. The black contours are from the model by Beuermann et al. (1985), and red contours with levels of 10 K, 100 K and 300 K from outside to inside are from the present 3D-model.

3.2 The scale-height obtained for inclined galaxies

Dumke et al. (1995, 2000) proposed a scheme to derive the scale-height of the synchrotron emission for highly inclined galaxies. The intensity profile along the major axis is projected to the axis by scaling the width by a factor . For an edge-on galaxy, the projection results in a delta-function at the centre. The projected profile is then smoothed by using a Gaussian beam corresponding to the angular resolution of the observation. The smoothed profile is fitted by a Gaussian to yield a new half power beam width (HPBW), called the effective beam size. The observed disk profile of a galaxy is commonly assumed to be exponential () or Gaussian ()), which is convolved to the effective beam size. By fitting the newly convolved profile to the observation, the scale-heights ( or ) can be obtained. In this way, both the smoothing effects from the observations and the influence of the inclined disk can be accounted for. This procedure was subsequently used by many authors. Although this method is based on reasonable assumptions, there is no independent verification.

We simulated the 4.8 GHz synchrotron emission from the Galaxy viewed edge-on at a distance of 5 Mpc with a sampling of , made stripe integrations perpendicular to the disk, and normalised the profile with the intensity maximum at . The result is shown in Fig. 3. The distribution is well fitted by an exponential with a scale-height of 0.74 kpc, which is close to the value of 0.8 kpc for the cosmic-ray electron density in our model (see Table 1). The intrinsic value is thus  kpc, which one expects to obtain from observations at any inclinations and angular resolutions.

Figure 3: Normalised intensity distribution along for the Milky Way Galaxy when seen edge-on. The fitted exponential scale-height is = 0.74 kpc.

We simulated galaxies with inclinations from to in steps of , and smoothed the total intensity maps to an angular resolution of , which is about that of the Effelsberg 100-m telescope at 10 GHz. Stripe integrations were made in the same way as for the edge-on case shown in Fig. 3 and the results are shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4: Average intensity distribution (shown by black dots) along for galaxies observed with a beam. The projected and smoothed profiles used to obtain the effective HPBW as indicated is shown in the left column. Fits from exponential and Gaussian disks were shown by solid and dotted lines, respectively.

For the effective HPBW is as expected. For smaller inclination angles the HPBW gradually broadens, which accounts for the contribution from the disk. For , only models with exponential disks yield good fits (Fig. 4). This is expected because the input disk of the model is exponential. For small inclinations, the fits with an exponential or a Gaussian disk are both fairly good for intensities larger than about 10% of the central value (Fig. 4). However, only models with exponential disks reproduce the intrinsic scale-heights reasonably. The scale-height is overestimated by about 10% at and about 40% at . The Gaussian disks always produce too large scale-heights. For NGC 253 with , Heesen et al. (2009) found  kpc. For this inclination, we got a scale-height 15% larger than expected, which exceeds the quoted error, and indicates the inclination limit for the method. For galaxies with inclination angles below , the contribution from the disk masks the much fainter halo emission, so that a scale-height determination is not meaningful anymore.

For many galaxies, models with two exponential disks seem to give a better fit. Their typical scale-heights from 6 cm observations are at the order of 300 pc and 1.8 kpc (e.g. Dumke & Krause 1998; Soida et al. 2011). This is not the case for our Galaxy model, where individual source complexes in the disk are not included. We note that in most cases the difference between one- and two-disk models are based on intensities below about 10% of the central values (e.g. Fig. 6 in Dumke et al. 2000). More galaxies observed with a high signal-to-noise ratios are required for a thorough statistical study.

4 Energy equipartition

The assumption of energy equipartition or minimum energy assumption has been widely used to estimate magnetic fields in galaxies or supernova remnants. Beck (2005) gave a thorough review on this topic and a detailed discussion on its application. We followed Beck & Krause (2005) to calculate the average magnetic field with the observed synchrotron total intensity and spectral index (), and the so-called factor, which is the ratio between the proton and electron number density per unit energy. For spiral galaxies, the factor was traditionally set to 100 (e.g. Niklas & Beck 1997) and more recent evidence favors this value (see e.g. Heesen et al. 2011).

The true average total magnetic field in the disk, which we used in the model, can be represented as , where the regular field has an exponential shape at radii larger than 5 kpc and a constant value inside, and the random field is homogeneous with a variance of 3 G (Sun et al. 2008). The radial profile of the total magnetic field calculated this way is shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5: Average total magnetic field estimates based on energy equipartition for an edge-on (open circle) and a face-on (filled circle) view of the Galaxy. The factor is indicated. The total magnetic field strength of the model is shown by a solid line.

We simulated the synchrotron emission for an edge-on and a face-on view of the Galaxy. In both cases we assessed the average total magnetic field based on equipartition (Beck & Krause 2005) with a path-length of 20 kpc and 2 kpc, respectively. For factor, we used the value 100, which is the currently best estimate. The results are shown in Fig. 5. The magnetic field strengths for both views are very similar, because the emission from the disk dominates the total intensity compared to the emission from the halo. At a radius of 8.5 kpc, the field strength is consistent with the value 6G calculated by E. Berkhuijsen (see Beck 2001) based on the emission in the plane from the Beuermann et al. (1985) model (see their Fig. 6a).

The magnetic field strength estimated from energy equipartition with a factor of 100, however, overestimates the true field strength by a factor of nearly 2. To roughly reproduce the intrinsic total magnetic field, the factor should be about 10 (Fig. 5). However, as already pointed out above, seems to be well settled (Heesen et al. 2011). The overestimated magnetic field strength indicates that the cosmic-ray particle energy is about four times larger than the magnetic energy in our model. The energy density of the magnetic field including both regular and random components is  ergs cm at  kpc, and correspondingly the energy density of cosmic-ray particles is about  ergs cm. The local total pressure from cosmic rays and magnetic field is  dyn cm. As summarised by Cox (2005), to support the gas against the gravity, the local non-thermal pressure from cosmic rays, magnetic fields and gas motions all together should be about  dyn cm. The dynamic pressure is therefore about  dyn cm, which dominates the pressure from magnetic fields. Recent MHD simulations by Hill et al. (2012) show that the magnetic field does not play an important role in supporting the gas.

Figure 6: Total intensity (I) at 1.4 GHz, rotation measure (RM) calculated from 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz simulations, Faraday depth (FD), and depolarisation maps between 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz (DP) and between 1.4 GHz and 4.8 GHz (DP) for two Milky Way galaxies with inclination angles and , respectively.

It is clear that the equipartition magnetic field strength does not agree with the true value obtained directly from the model. This is not unexpected, as we know that our input model does not satisfy energy equipartition. In the same sense, it is also very uncertain whether spiral galaxies generally conform to the energy equipartition. It is thus questionable whether magnetic field estimates based on energy equipartition are reliable.

One may ask if it is possible to use the equipartition value for the magnetic field and adapt the cosmic-ray density accordingly to model the Galaxy. We have tested that and could not reach an agreement with the observations. A higher regular magnetic field will increase the RMs of pulsars and extragalactic sources, which could only be compensated by decreasing the thermal electron density. The latter, however, has been constrained by pulsar dispersion measures. Increasing the random field component will increase the total synchrotron emission and hence the cosmic-ray electron density must be reduced. This consequently reduces the polarisation intensity. To reproduce the observations, the regular magnetic field has to be increased, which is difficult as explained at the beginning.

In case the Milky Way is not exceptional, the equipartition magnetic field strength estimated for might also be lower for other galaxies. The reduction by a factor of two we found for the Milky Way corresponds to a magnetic energy density decrease by a factor of four and has a large influence on the average magnetic pressure. For example, when equipartition is assumed the magnetic field energy density clearly dominates the turbulent energy density outside of the inner kpc of NGC 6946 (Beck 2007). This is very puzzling, because the turbulent magnetic field is believed to be connected to turbulent gas motions. When reducing the magnetic energy density by a factor of four, however, it is almost equal to the turbulent energy density.

5 Rotation measures of galaxies

We simulated two samples of galaxies at 4.8 GHz (6.25 cm) and 8.4 GHz ( cm), which are standard frequencies for nearby galaxy observations. RM maps of nearby galaxies are mainly calculated from polarisation measurements at these frequencies (e.g. Beck 2007). It is generally assumed that the galaxies are Faraday thin at these frequencies, which means that the observed polarised emission originates from the same volume. We placed the simulated galaxies at a distance of 5 Mpc, corresponding to a maximum size of about , when the galaxies are seen face-on. The resolution or the grid size of the simulations is or about 440 pc, which is comparable to observations and provides some details of the large-scale emission from the galaxies.

We simulated maps for all Stokes parameters and from them calculated polarisation angles () at both frequencies. From the polarisation angle maps, we obtained RM for each individual pixel as,

(2)

where the subscripts stand for the two bands, e.g. = 6.25 cm and = 3.6 cm. The -ambiguity of the polarisation angles at these two bands corresponds to a RM of 1194 rad m. We assume that =0 and the RM values are smaller than the ambiguity, which is certainly true except for the centre regions.

The Faraday depth (FD) of a galaxy in rad m is defined as,

(3)

where is the thermal electron density in cm and is the magnetic field parallel to the line-of-sight in G. The integral is calculated along the line-of-sight from the far to the near side of the galaxy. It is obvious that FDs are very important to understand the properties of magnetic fields and thermal electron densities. In the case that the synchrotron-emitting medium and the thermal gas are uniformly mixed, one would expect (e.g. Sokoloff et al. 1998). However, as we will show below, the relation does not hold anymore when the frequency-dependent polarisation horizon is shorter than the size of a galaxy.

The RM and FD maps for a nearly face-on () and a nearly edge-on () galaxy are shown in Fig. 6. In general, both RM and FD maps show the same intensity pattern, which means that RM maps based on observations correctly indicate the orientation of the large-scale field of a galaxy. The field reversals in the Milky Way Galaxy and the opposite sign of the halo magnetic field above and below the Galactic plane are reflected in the RM maps.

The RMs multiplied by a factor of two were compared to the corresponding FDs in Fig. 7. For nearly face-on galaxies () both distributions are basically consistent with each other, although a small amount of scatter is visible. For nearly edge-on galaxies (), however, the differences are significant. Large deviations from FD (Fig. 7) are seen for large FD values originating in the disk. The reason is that the simulated 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz polarised emission does not originate from the same volume. The polarisation horizon at 4.8 GHz is smaller than that at 8.4 GHz. Higher-frequency observations are needed to overcome this effect and provide RMs proportional to FDs.

Structure functions (e.g. Sun & Reich 2009) for RMs and FDs were calculated following

(4)

where stands for ensemble average and is the angular separation. The results are shown in Fig. 7. The structure functions for RM, when scaled by a factor of two, is equivalent to shifting constantly the structure functions for the original RM upwards along the ordinate axis in Fig. 7. For galaxies with high inclinations, the slopes of the structure functions differ for RMs and FDs, while for low-inclination galaxies RMs mimic FDs quite well after being multiplied by a factor of two.

Figure 7: RMs times a factor of two versus FDs (top row). The solid line indicates the expectation for uniformly mixed thermal and synchrotron emission. The structure functions (bottom row) from the FD maps are shown by black dots, those from RM maps and RMs scaled by a factor of two by squares.

In summary, for face-on galaxies RMs derived from 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz polarisation measurements can be safely used to infer magnetic fields after being scaled by a factor of 2. For edge-on galaxies or highly inclined galaxies, however, RMs are only reliable in the outskirts of these galaxies, but still indicate the orientation of the magnetic field direction.

In Fig. 6 we show maps of the depolarisation between the two simulated maps at 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz, which show clear differences related to their inclination. For the definition of depolarisation (DP) we follow Heesen et al. (2011) as,

(5)

where is the spectral index for brightness temperature. A value of means no depolarisation, and means total depolarisation. In the depolarisation map for the galaxy with inclination , the values exceed 92% everywhere. For the nearly edge-on galaxy with , the DP along the major axis is small and the values close to the centre are about 40%. Although our model does not include discrete thermal complexes such as H II regions, which are certainly present along the spiral arms, the depolarisation maps show a patchy morphology. This results from the various random magnetic field components along line-of-sights. The highly inclined galaxy NGC 253 with was recently studied by Heesen et al. (2011) using polarisation observations at 4.8 GHz and 8.4 GHz. Their depolarisation map shows similar values as our results, although their distribution of depolarisation patches is more complex than ours. The main reason is the missing discrete source complexes in our model.

We also calculated the depolarisation (DP) between 1.4 GHz and 4.8 GHz (Fig. 6). For low inclination galaxies, DP is around 40% within and there is a slight asymmetry along the minor axis direction, which is caused by the toroidal halo field. We note that some galaxies, for instance NGC 6946, show a clear asymmetric polarisation at frequencies around 1.4 GHz with complete depolarisation towards a large patch (Beck 2007; Heald et al. 2009). This might indicate a more complex halo field configuration than in the Milky Way. A quadrupole field configuration was discussed by Braun et al. (2010), but asymmetries could also be ascribed to some large-scale distortions from a regular configuration. In our Galaxy, discrete large RM or polarisation features exist, for instance the well pronounced large Fan region (e.g. Wolleben et al. 2006), which are commonly considered to be local. If such regions reside out of the Galactic plane or in the halo, they would make the polarisation properties of our Galaxy asymmetric and thus similar to others. More investigations are needed to improve Galactic emission models.

6 Integrated polarisation properties of Milky Way type galaxies

Spiral galaxies are believed to occupy a large fraction of the polarised radio sources at 1.4 GHz at Jy flux densities (Stil et al. 2007). However, they are difficult to be resolved individually even with instruments such as ASKAP (Johnston et al. 2007) or the future SKA. It is therefore important to investigate the polarisation properties of unresolved spiral galaxies.

We simulated 1000 Milky-Way-like galaxies by randomly setting and (see Sect. 2.2) at each of the five frequencies: 1.4 GHz, 2.7 GHz, 4.8 GHz, 8.4 GHz, and 22 GHz. The distance was set to 10 Mpc and the angular resolution to or 0.87 kpc. We have tried simulations at higher angular resolutions and the results are similar. A sample of Milky-Way-like galaxies at 1.4 GHz is shown in Fig. 8.

Figure 8: Sample of Milky-Way-like galaxies at 1.4 GHz in total intensity. The inclination angles are marked. The position of the Solar System (local enhancement) is indicated by a black dot. The angular resolution is . The gray scale runs from 0 to 1.5 K.

For each object we integrated the , and maps and obtained the polarisation intensity and the polarisation percentage . We binned the data according to their inclination angles with a step interval of . The average percentage polarisation as a function of inclination is shown in Fig. 9.

Face-on galaxies show a small degree of polarisation because of the assumed symmetry of the magnetic field in the disk, which strongly cancels the and components when integrated. This is common for all frequencies (Fig. 9). Faraday effects become highly significant for edge-on galaxies because of the large path-length along the disk emission, which renders the polarisation percentage low. Therefore the maximum polarisation percentage is expected in between, around at 2.7 GHz, around at 4.8 GHz and around at 8.4 GHz. The shift stems from the reduction of Faraday depolarisation towards higher frequencies. At low frequencies such as 1.4 GHz, however, Faraday effects are strong irrespective of inclinations, which always yields small polarisation percentages. At high frequencies, the thermal fraction in a galaxy gets larger, which consequently reduces the polarisation percentage despite reduced Faraday depolarisation and explains the lower percentage polarisation at 22 GHz when compared with those at 8.4 GHz.

Figure 9: Polarisation percentages of unresolved Milky Way galaxies versus inclination angles at several frequencies as indicated.

The polarisation percentage at 4.8 GHz (Fig. 9) peaks at the same inclination range as that found by Stil et al. (2009) or Stil (2009), who used a geometrical galaxy model. The models by Stil et al. (2009) all predict zero polarisation percentage for edge-on galaxies, which is not found in our simulations. The internal depolarisation for edge-on galaxies was probably overestimated by Stil et al. (2009). In those cases, the polarisation horizon is small (e.g. Sun et al. 2011) and much shorter than the diameter of the disk. However, the disk size was used by Stil et al. (2009) to derive the RM fluctuations, which certainly results in too large fluctuation and hence depolarisation. In fact, most of the edge-on galaxies observed at 4.8 GHz show considerable polarisation percentages (see Fig. 1 in Stil et al. 2009), and agree with our simulations (Fig. 9).

The distribution of polarisation percentages for 1000 simulated galaxies at 1.4 GHz and 4.8 GHz are presented in Fig. 10, which peaks at about 0.8% at 1.4 GHz and 4.2% at 4.8 GHz. In our distributions, the relative number of galaxies at zero polarisation percentage is very small, which is clearly opposite to that in the histograms by Stil et al. (2009, their Fig. 6). This difference is not caused by varying the parameters in the model of Stil et al. (2009), and should be explained in the following way: To ensure a spacial uniform distribution of galaxies, the probability to observe a galaxy at inclination between and is proportional to (e.g. Stil et al. 2009), meaning the relative number of edge-on galaxies is maximal. Provided that edge-on galaxies have zero percentage as modelled by Stil et al. (2009), it follows that there is still a significant number of galaxies at zero percentage in their distributions.

We note that the polarisation percentages can be as high as about 20% in the models by Stil et al. (2009) with varying magnetic field properties. In this paper, we simulate Milky-Way-like galaxies with the same properties of the interstellar medium, as they were derived from observations (Sun et al. 2008), and simply rotate the Milky Way Galaxy to realise different inclinations. This sample should therefore be considered as a subset of spiral galaxies. In future when more data are available from e.g. GALFACTS (Taylor & Salter 2010), we will try to represent general galaxies by modifying the Milky Way model accordingly.

Figure 10: Histogram of polarisation percentages at 1.4 GHz (black) and 4.8 GHz (red) for 1000 simulated Milky Way galaxies.

The observed polarisation from unresolved galaxies results from averaging the projection of their azimuthal magnetic field components on the plane of the sky. Therefore we expect an alignment between the B-vectors () and the position angles of the major axes (), which is indeed seen from the present simulations as shown in Fig. 11. This means that polarisation angles of galaxies, when calculated from their integrated emission, do not vary with frequencies, implying that these galaxies do not show intrinsic RMs. This result has already been reported by Stil et al. (2009) from their simulations and is now confirmed. This characteristic makes unresolved spiral galaxies with optically measured position angles ideal background polarised sources to study Galactic and intergalactic large-scale magnetic fields with instruments like the future SKA.

Figure 11: B-vectors () versus position angles of the major axes from simulated Milky Way galaxies at 1.4 GHz and 4.8 GHz.

7 Summary

The Milky Way Galaxy is widely considered as a typical spiral galaxy. We used the observationally well constrained Galactic 3D-emission model (Sun et al. 2008; Sun & Reich 2010) to simulate emission of galaxies by putting the Galaxy away at any distances and rotating it by any angle.

In our models, the scale-height of the synchrotron emission from the Milky Way is much smaller than that assumed in the early models (Phillipps et al. 1981; Beuermann et al. 1985). At that time, the evidence for the local synchrotron excess was not well determined and therefore not taken into account. We fit to our Milky Way model, when seen edge-on, an exponential scale-height of 0.74 kpc.

We tested a current analysis method to derive the scale-height of highly inclined galaxies. We find that for Milky Way galaxies the scale-height apparently gets larger with decreasing inclination. For inclinations larger than , however, the increase is below 10%. The total magnetic field estimate based on the equipartition assumption is about twice that of the Milky Way Galaxy model.

Polarisation observations of highly inclined galaxies when used to derive the distribution of RMs are not reliable for their inner parts. At frequencies of 4.8 GHz or lower, they are not Faraday thin anymore. The polarised emission from two frequency observations used to calculate RMs originates from different depths. This is also reflected in the slope of the structure functions, which clearly differ for RMs and FDs for galaxies nearly seen edge-on.

We simulated a large sample of distant unresolved galaxies as it will be accessible to the future SKA and its path-finders, and analysed the polarisation properties of this sample for a large frequency range. This analysis follows that by Stil et al. (2009) of a large spiral galaxy sample based on their model of polarised emission. We qualitatively confirm the Stil et al. (2009) results, where the percentage polarisation drops to zero for face-on galaxies at all frequencies. For edge-on galaxies Stil et al. (2009) found almost no percentage polarisation, while we note a moderate polarisation percentage decrease. The peak percentage polarisation of the galaxy sample peaks at about 4.2% at 4.8 GHz. At 1.4 GHz we find an average percentage polarisations of about 0.8%. We confirm the previous finding by Stil et al. (2009) that unresolved spiral galaxies have a very well aligned polarisation angle in the direction of the galaxies major axis, which makes them ideal sources to study foreground Faraday rotation effects on Mpc-scales.

Acknowledgements.
X.S. was supported by the Australian Research Council through grant FL100100114. X.S. thanks for financial support by the MPG and by Prof. M. Kramer during his stay at MPIfR, where most of this work was done. We thank Patricia Reich and Bryan Gaensler for thorough reading of the manuscript and also the anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

  • Beck (2001) Beck, R. 2001, Space Sci. Rev., 99, 243
  • Beck (2005) Beck, R. 2005, in The Magnetized Plasma in Galaxy Evolution, ed. K. T. Chyzy, K. Otmianowska-Mazur, M. Soida, & R.-J. Dettmar , 193–200
  • Beck (2007) Beck, R. 2007, A&A, 470, 539
  • Beck & Gaensler (2004) Beck, R., & Gaensler, B. M. 2004, NewAR, 48, 1289
  • Beck & Krause (2005) Beck, R., & Krause, M. 2005, AN, 326, 414
  • Beuermann et al. (1985) Beuermann, K., Kanbach, G., & Berkhuijsen, E. M. 1985, A&A, 153, 17
  • Braun et al. (2010) Braun, R., Heald, G., & Beck, R. 2010, A&A, 514, A42
  • Brown et al. (2007) Brown, J. C., Haverkorn, M., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 258
  • Brown et al. (2003) Brown, J. C., Taylor, A. R., & Jackel, B. J. 2003, ApJS, 145, 213
  • Cordes & Lazio (2002) Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
  • Cox (2005) Cox, D. P. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 337
  • Dumke & Krause (1998) Dumke, M., & Krause, M. 1998, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Vol. 506, IAU Colloq. 166: The Local Bubble and Beyond, ed. D. Breitschwerdt, M. J. Freyberg, & J. Truemper, 555
  • Dumke et al. (2000) Dumke, M., Krause, M., & Wielebinski, R. 2000, A&A, 355, 512
  • Dumke et al. (1995) Dumke, M., Krause, M., Wielebinski, R., & Klein, U. 1995, A&A, 302, 691
  • Fleishman & Tokarev (1995) Fleishman, G. D., & Tokarev, Y. V. 1995, A&A, 293, 565
  • Gaensler et al. (2008) Gaensler, B. M., Madsen, G. J., Chatterjee, S., & Mao, S. A. 2008, PASA, 25, 184
  • Gold et al. (2009) Gold, B., Bennett, C. L., Hill, R. S., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 265
  • Gold et al. (2011) Gold, B., Odegard, N., Weiland, J. L., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 15
  • Górski et al. (2005) Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759
  • Han et al. (2006) Han, J. L., Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., Qiao, G. J., & van Straten, W. 2006, ApJ, 642, 868
  • Haslam et al. (1982) Haslam, C. G. T., Salter, C. J., Stoffel, H., & Wilson, W. E. 1982, A&AS, 47, 1
  • Heald et al. (2009) Heald, G., Braun, R., & Edmonds, R. 2009, A&A, 503, 409
  • Heesen et al. (2011) Heesen, V., Beck, R., Krause, M., & Dettmar, R.-J. 2011, A&A, 535, A79
  • Heesen et al. (2009) Heesen, V., Krause, M., Beck, R., & Dettmar, R. 2009, A&A, 506, 1123
  • Hill et al. (2012) Hill, A. S., Joung, M. R., Mac Low, M.-M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 104
  • Johnston et al. (2007) Johnston, S., Bailes, M., Bartel, N., et al. 2007, PASA, 24, 174
  • Niklas & Beck (1997) Niklas, S., & Beck, R. 1997, A&A, 320, 54
  • Nord et al. (2006) Nord, M. E., Henning, P. A., Rand, R. J., Lazio, T. J. W., & Kassim, N. E. 2006, AJ, 132, 242
  • Noutsos et al. (2008) Noutsos, A., Johnston, S., Kramer, M., & Karastergiou, A. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1881
  • Page et al. (2007) Page, L., Hinshaw, G., Komatsu, E., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 335
  • Phillipps et al. (1981) Phillipps, S., Kearsey, S., Osborne, J. L., Haslam, C. G. T., & Stoffel, H. 1981, A&A, 103, 405
  • Roger et al. (1999) Roger, R. S., Costain, C. H., Landecker, T. L., & Swerdlyk, C. M. 1999, A&AS, 137, 7
  • Soida et al. (2011) Soida, M., Krause, M., Dettmar, R.-J., & Urbanik, M. 2011, A&A, 531, A127
  • Sokoloff et al. (1998) Sokoloff, D. D., Bykov, A. A., Shukurov, A., et al. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 189
  • Stil et al. (2007) Stil, J., Taylor, A. R., Krause, M., & Beck, R. 2007, in From Planets to Dark Energy: the Modern Radio Universe, 69
  • Stil (2009) Stil, J. M. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 407, The Low-Frequency Radio Universe, ed. D. J. Saikia, D. A. Green, Y. Gupta, & T. Venturi, 147
  • Stil et al. (2009) Stil, J. M., Krause, M., Beck, R., & Taylor, A. R. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1392
  • Sun & Reich (2010) Sun, X., & Reich, W. 2010, RAA, 10, 1287
  • Sun & Reich (2009) Sun, X. H., & Reich, W. 2009, A&A, 507, 1087
  • Sun et al. (2011) Sun, X. H., Reich, W., Han, J. L., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A74
  • Sun et al. (2008) Sun, X. H., Reich, W., Waelkens, A., & Enßlin, T. A. 2008, A&A, 477, 573
  • Taylor & Salter (2010) Taylor, A. R., & Salter, C. J. 2010, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 438, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. R. Kothes, T. L. Landecker, & A. G. Willis, 402
  • Taylor et al. (2009) Taylor, A. R., Stil, J. M., & Sunstrum, C. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1230
  • Testori et al. (2008) Testori, J. C., Reich, P., & Reich, W. 2008, A&A, 484, 733
  • Van Eck et al. (2011) Van Eck, C. L., Brown, J. C., Stil, J. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 97
  • Waelkens et al. (2009) Waelkens, A., Jaffe, T., Reinecke, M., Kitaura, F. S., & Enßlin, T. A. 2009, A&A, 495, 697
  • Wolleben et al. (2006) Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Reich, W., & Wielebinski, R. 2006, A&A, 448, 411
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
133248
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description