\phi Meson Measurements at RHIC with the PHENIX Detector

Meson Measurements at RHIC with the PHENIX Detector

\firstnameMurad \lastnameSarsour\fnsep on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration 1Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA1 msar@gsu.edu
Abstract

The measurement of mesons provides a unique and complementary method for exploring properties of the hot and dense medium created in the relativistic heavy ion collisions. It has a relatively small hadronic interaction cross section and is sensitive to the increase of strangeness (strangeness enhancement), a phenomenon associated with soft particles in bulk matter. Measurements in the dilepton channels are especially interesting since leptons interact only electromagnetically, thus carrying the information from their production phase directly to the detector. Measurements in different nucleus-nucleus collisions allow us to perform a systematic study of the nuclear medium effects on meson production. The PHENIX detector provides the capabilities to measure the meson production in a wide range of transverse momentum and rapidity to study these effects.

In this proceeding, we present measurements of the mesons in a variety of collision systems at = 200 GeV. In case of small systems, the data are compared with AMPT calculations to study the various cold nuclear medium effects involved in meson production.

1 Introduction

Ever since RHIC announced the discovery of the hot and dense state of strongly interacting matter called Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) NPA.757.184 ; NPA.757.102 ; EurPhysJ.Plus.131.70 the main objective has been to quantify its properties. This is accomplished by looking at as many observables as possible, such as the nuclear modification of meson production in the QGP environment. meson is an excellent probe for studying QGP in heavy ion collisions because it is sensitive to several aspects of the collision, including modifications of strangeness production in bulk matter. Owing to its small inelastic cross section for interaction with nonstrange hadrons, the meson is less affected by late hadronic rescattering and may reflect the initial evolution of the system. Being composed of a nearly pure strange antistrange () state, the meson puts additional constraints on models of quark recombination in the QGP. However to gauge the QGP related modifications, we need to know the meson production in collisions as a baseline. There are additional effects from the nuclear medium itself, cold nuclear matter effects (CNM), and they are accessed by studying meson production in small system collisions (e.g. Au).

The lepton decay channel is of particular interest because of the absence of strong interactions between muons and the surrounding hot hadronic matter. At forward rapidity, it allows us to study the rapidity dependence of meson production and especially in asymmetric heavy-ion collisions provides the means for accessing different mixtures of initial and final state effects.

In collisions, the meson production is important to study because it may have similar production mechanisms to other onia like and . In addition, it provides a tool to study effects that scale with mass (e.g. collective effects) since it is the heaviest easily accessible meson made of light quarks.

2 Experimental Setup

The PHENIX detector NIMA.499.469 has a high rate capability utilizing a fast DAQ and specialized triggers, high granularity detectors, and good mass resolution and particle ID. Detection of utilizes the finely grained electromagnetic calorimeter (EMCal), the drift chamber and ring imaging Cherenkov detector, while the are detected by the forward spectrometers consisting of Muon ID and Muon Tracker. The very forward beam-beam counters (BBC) are used to determine the collision vertex position and time, the beam luminosity and form a minimum bias trigger.

The PHENIX collaboration collected data from a variety of collisions systems provided by the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). Results from some of these data sets are presented in this proceeding.

3 Results

PHENIX has measured the production of meson in collisions at = 200 GeV over a wide range of and rapidity PRD.83.052004 ; PRD.90.052002 , which is a very important resource for validating the phenomenological models of strangeness production. In addition, these measurements provide baseline for studying cold and hot nuclear modifications.

To gain insight into nuclear medium effects and particle production mechanisms in + collisions, the ratio of the meson yields in + collisions to collisions scaled by the number of nucleon-nucleon collisions in the + system,  PRC.87.034904 , is calculated as:

(1)

where is the per-event yield of particle production in heavy ion collisions and is the per-event yield of the same process in collisions. The invariant yield used in the + calculation for the  decay channel is the differential cross section PRD.90.052002 divided by the total cross section, 42.2 mb.

Measurements of meson at midrapidity in heavy ion collisions show that meson exhibits a different suppression pattern compared to lighter mesons ( and ) and baryons (protons and antiprotons) PRC.83.024909 . For all centralities, meson is less suppressed than and in the intermediate range (2–5 GeV/c), whereas , and show similar suppression at higher . However, meson at forward and backward rapidities PRC.92.044909 show that meson yields in most central Au collisions are suppressed at low- ( 2 GeV/c) in the -going direction and strongly enhanced in Au-going direction in the intermediate range (2–3 GeV/c). This modification decreases as we move towards peripheral collisions. No modification of meson production is observed in the most peripheral Au collisions. meson as a function of was measured for different centralities and a nuclear modification very similar to that of the heavy flavor muons is observed PRL.112.252301 . The meson enhancement in the Au-going direction and the suppression in the -going direction are consistent with what is observed by ALICE in Pb collisions at =5.02 TeV in and  PLB.768.203 .

The nuclear-modification factor is also studied in CuAu collisions, , at = 200 GeV to evaluate the effects of hot and cold nuclear matter on meson production. Although statistically limited, we observed a dependence of on both centrality and rapidity with a similar trend to that observed in Au collisions PRC.92.044909 .

Figure 1: meson production cross section in and GeV/c in collisions versus the center-of-mass energy, , compared to different model predictions.

PHENIX measured the differential cross section of meson at forward and backward rapidities in collisions at GeV arXiv.1710.01656v1 . The integrated cross section over the measured range, 2.79 0.20 (stat) 0.17 (syst) 0.34 (norm) mb, from this measurement and those from PHENIX at GeV PRD.90.052002 and LHC at 2.76 and 7.0 TeV PLB.703.267 ; PLB.710.557 ; EurPhysJC.72.2183 ; PLB.768.203 are used to study the energy dependence of meson production at forward rapidity, , in collisions, as shown in Fig. 1. Comparisons to PYTHIA6 JHighEnergyPhys.05.026 , PYTHIA8 ComputPhysCommun.191.159 , PHOJET hep-ph.9803437 , AMPT PRC.72.064901 , EPOS3 PRC.89.064903 and EPOS-LHC PRC.92.034906 model predictions show that these models exhibit similar energy dependence trend to that of the data. Further studies with EPOS3 model show that the addition of the hydrodynamic evolution of the system induces an enhancement of meson production at the LHC energies at intermediate , which hints at collective effects, however, no effect is observed at RHIC energies arXiv.1710.01656v1 .

PHENIX collected data from HeAu, Au and Al collisions in 2014 and 2015. In addition to Au data set collected in 2008 PRC.83.024909 , these data allow to carry out a systematic study of the various cold nuclear matter effects included in models like AMPT and EPOS.

Figure 2: Left: meson invarient yield compared with AMPT model predictions with different combinations of nuclear medium effects. Right: meson invarient yields from HeAu, Au, Au and Al collisions compared with AMPT model predictions that include string melting, shadowing and quenching PRC.72.064901 .

The left panel of Fig. 2 shows AMPT model predictions with different combination of effects included against meson invariant yield in Au collisions. The right panel shows the AMPT model predictions, with the string melting, shadowing and quenching turned on, compared to the data.

4 Summary

The PHENIX collaboration measured meson production, over a wide range in the forward and backward rapidities in a variety of collision systems to study cold and hot nuclear matter effects. In Au collisions, we observed an enhancement (suppression) of meson production in the backward (forward) rapidity region in most central collisions. Similar behavior was previously observed for inclusive charged hadrons and open heavy flavor muons which may suggest similar cold nuclear matter effects.

The PHENIX collaboration also measured meson production in collisions at GeV at backward and forward rapidities, = 2.79 0.20 (stat) 0.17 (syst) 0.34 (norm) mb. Combined with previous PHENIX and LHC measurements, this measurement allowed studying the energy dependence of meson production in collisions over a wide energy range. Comparisons with EPOS3 model showed a hint of collective effects in at LHC energies and no effect at RHIC energies.

New data sets from Au and Al collisions collected in 2015 allow measurement at backward and forward rapidities in less complicated Au and Al systems. The wealth of small system data sets (HeAu, Au, Au and Al) along with the introduction of the forward vertex detector in 2015 data sets will allow studying the different CNM effects using models like AMPT and EPOS.

References

  • (1) K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005).
  • (2) J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005).
  • (3) R. Nouicer, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 70 (2016).
  • (4) K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 499, 469 (2003).
  • (5) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 052002 (2014).
  • (6) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 83, 052004 (2011).
  • (7) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 87, 034904 (2013).
  • (8) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 83, 024909 (2011).
  • (9) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 92, 044909 (2015).
  • (10) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 252301 (2014).
  • (11) J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 768, 203 (2017).
  • (12) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), arXiv:1710.01656v1 (2017).
  • (13) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 710, 557 (2012).
  • (14) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2183 (2012).
  • (15) R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 703, 267 (2011).
  • (16) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 5, 26 (2006).
  • (17) T. Sjostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  • (18) F. W. Bopp, R. Engel, and J. Ranft, hep-ph/9803437 (1998).
  • (19) Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005).
  • (20) K. Werner, B. Guiot, Iu. Karpenko, and T. Pierog, Phys. Rev. C 89, 064903 (2014).
  • (21) T. Pierog, Iu. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
308932
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description