Phase Transition in a Bond Fluctuating Lattice Polymer
Hima Bindu Kolli
and
K.P.N.Murthy
School of Physics, University of Hyderabad
Hyderabad 500046
November 2011
ABSTRACT
This report deals with phase transition in Bond Fluctuation Model (BFM) of a linear homo polymer on a two dimensional square lattice. Each monomer occupies a unit cell of four lattice sites. The condition that a lattice site can at best be a part of only one monomer ensures self avoidance and models excluded volume effect. We have simulated polymers with number of monomers ranging from to employing Boltzmann and nonBoltzmann Monte Carlo simulation techniques. To detect and characterize phase transition we have investigated heat capacity through energy fluctuations, Landau free energy profiles and Binder’s fourth cumulant. We have investigated (1) free standing polymer (2) polymer in the presence of of an attracting wall and (3) polymer confined between two attracting walls. In general we find there are two transitions as we cool the system. The first occurs at relatively higher temperature. The polymer goes from an extended coil to a collapsed globule conformation. This we call collapse transition. We find that this transition is first order. The second occurs at a lower temperature in which the polymer goes from a collapsed phase to a very compact crystalline phase. This transition is also discontinuous. We find that in the presence of wall(s) the collapse transition occurs at lower temperature compared to a free standing polymer.
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Polymers
A polymer is a long chain of several simple atomic groupings called monomers. These monomers are held together by chemical bonds [1]. The process of forming a long chain of monomers is called polymerization. The number of monomers in a polymer is denoted by and is called the degree of polymerization. If the available bonds for a monomer are two, then the process of polymerization leads to a linear polymer. If the available bonds are more than two, then it leads to a branched and cross linked polymer. A polymer with same type of monomers is called a homopolymer and that with different types of monomers is called a heteropolymer. In this report we shall deal with a linear homopolymer.
1.2 Solvent and Temperature Effect
A polymer can exist in several conformations [2].
The conformation has a direct bearing on its physical
properties. The conformational statistics of a polymer chain depends
on the solvent quality. For a good solvent, interactions between
monomers and solvent molecules are more favourable than interaction
between nonbonded monomers. Hence in a good solvent, polymer segments would
prefer to be surrounded by the solvent, leading to a swollen coil
conformation. We call this as extended phase. For a bad solvent, the
interaction between nonbonded monomers are more favourable leading
to a compact globule conformation. We call this as collapsed phase. A good
parameter that quantifies the size of the polymer is the radius of gyration
The quality of solvent is often parameterized by temperature. Low temperatures correspond to a poor solvent and high temperatures correspond to a good solvent. As the temperature decreases, a transition occurs from an extended coil phase to collapsed globule phase. At very low temperatures, another transition from globular phase to crystalline phase takes place if the cooling rate is slow. Upon fast cooling glass formation becomes possible at these low temperatures.
Coarse grained models are often employed in polymer studies. A coarse grained model, see e.g. [3, 4, 5], treats a group of chemical monomers as a bead (effective monomer) ignoring the microscopic degrees of freedom, which are invariably present; it retains only the most basic features common to all polymers of the same chain topology. Such a model incorporates features such as chain connectivity, excluded volume effect and monomermonomer interactions.
In this work we consider lattice model of a linear homopolymer. For an introduction to lattice models of polymers, see e.g [3]. We restrict our attention to a polymer on a two dimensional square lattice. The trail of a self avoiding random walk provides a model of a polymer conformation. In this section, we give a brief description of random walk (RW), self avoiding walk (SAW) and Interacting self avoiding walk (ISAW).
1.3 Random Walk
A random walk starts from an arbitrary lattice point which is taken as origin. It selects one of the four nearest neighbour sites randomly and with equal probabilities and steps into it. This process is iterated and we get a random walk of desired length. Thus a simple random walk generates a chain that can intersect as well as fold on to itself. Fig. (1.1) shows a random walk of 22 steps.
In a polymer, we have the socalled excluded volume effect. This is also known as hard core repulsion. In a lattice model, the excluded volume effect can be easily implemented by demanding that a lattice site can at best be occupied by a single monomer. This leads us to self avoiding random walk.
1.4 Self Avoiding Walk (SAW)
A self avoiding walk is a random walk that does not visit a lattice
site it has already visited. A self avoiding walk
[6] is an athermal
1.5 Interacting Self Avoiding Walk (ISAW)
We assign an energy to every pair of occupied nearestneighbour sites which are not adjacent along the walk. Such a nonbonded nearest neighbour (nbNN) pair gives rise to an nbNN contact or simply a contact. If the interaction is attractive. If the interaction is repulsive. Thus a conformation with contacts has energy . A SAW with energy assigned in this fashion is called an Interacting Self Avoiding Walk (ISAW). A typical ISAW on a square lattice of walk length with total number of nbNN contacts is shown in Fig. (1.2). In this work, our aim is to study phase transition from an extended to a collapsed phase. Hence we take to be negative. Without loss of generality we set . In other words we measure energy in units of
1.6 Algorithms to generate ISAW
In the study of lattice polymers employing self avoiding walks three approaches have so far been tried out. The first is called stochastic growth algorithms which include kinetic growth walks. The second is based on the method proposed by Sokal involving local changes in a fully grown polymer. The third is called Bond Fluctuation Model (BFM). We discuss the first two approaches briefly below. The third model is discussed in detail in the next chapter.
1.6.1 Growth algorithm
An early stochastic growth method on a lattice employed a blind ant algorithm, where the ant moves blindly to one of the nearest neighbour sites with equal probability. At any growth step, if the selected site is already occupied by a monomer then we discard the whole walk and start all over again. This ensures that all the random walks are generated with equal probability given by , where is the number of steps in the walk. Notice that an step walk generates a polymer with monomers. From the lattice polymers generated by the blind ant, we can construct micro canonical ensembles by grouping then in terms of energies; we can also carry out canonical ensemble averages by attaching a Boltzmann weight to each walk based on its energy. A major problem with blind ant is sample attrition i.e., only a small fraction of starting chains are finally accepted. Most of the walks overlap or intersect before reaching the required chain length; in other words the walks get terminated early most of the time. This is called the problem of sample attrition. Longer the walk, the more is the problem posed by attrition. Partial remedy is Rosenbluth  Rosenbluth (RR) walk based on myopic ant [8]. The ant selects one of the unoccupied nearest neighbour sites randomly and with equal probability. Sample attrition is considerably reduced, though not eliminated. Trapping does still occur.
A major problem with a myopic ant is the following. The walks generated are not all equally probable. Hence we need Rosenbluth Rosenbluth (RR) weights, for calculating micro canonical ensemble averages. We need RR weights as well as Boltzmann weights, see below, for calculating canonical ensemble averages. RR weight usually fluctuates wildly from one walk to the other. Besides sample attrition is present, though less; hence long walks remain difficult to generate.
Kinetic Growth walks (KGW) [9] are RR walks, where,
we ignore RR weights
1.6.2 Sokal algorithm
The second approach is provided by A D Sokal [15]. We start with a lattice polymer of a given length. We make local changes employing moves like pivoting about a chosen monomer, cranking, rotating about an axis etc. in a self avoiding fashion to generate a trial configuration. Figs. (1.3, 1.4) depict some possible moves. We employ standard Metropolis algorithm to accept/reject the trial configuration. We generate a Markov chain of polymer conformations and the asymptotic part of the Markov chain corresponds to a canonical ensemble.
We calculate the desired properties by averaging over the canonical ensemble. A problem with Sokal’s algorithm is that local changes are often difficult to make and time consuming especially for long polymers.
1.6.3 Bond Fluctuation Model
The third approach is the bond fluctuating model [16]. It combines the advantages of both the growth and the Sokal algorithms. In this model we start with a possible polymer conformation of desired length like in Sokal’s algorithm. Hence there is no problem of sample attrition. A monomer is chosen and moved to its nearest neighbour site in a self avoiding way. The move is thus simple and local, like in growth algorithm. In this model, however, the bond length fluctuates. Since bond fluctuation model forms the backbone of this work, it is described separately and in details in next chapter.
Chapter 2 Bond Fluctuation model
Bond fluctuation model is a lattice model for simulating polymer
systems. It is useful for obtaining static and dynamic properties of
polymers. According to this model, a trial conformation is generated
by moving a randomly selected monomer from its current location to a
location one lattice spacing away, along one of the
possible directions chosen randomly and with equal probability. During
the move we must ensure that bond crossing does not occur and self
avoidance condition is satisfied. This model retains the advantages
of both growth algorithms and Sokal’s algorithm, see below.
Like in a growth algorithm, the move is local i.e.; a trial
conformation is generated by moving a randomly
selected monomer.
Like in Sokal’s algorithm, we start with a polymer of required size. A trial conformation,
generated by local rule, is accepted or rejected by Metropolis algorithm. Thus we generate a
Markov chain of lattice polymer conformations; asymptotic part of the chain constitutes
a canonical ensemble from which the desired macroscopic properties can be calculated.
2.1 Basic description of the Bond Fluctuation Model (BFM)
On a two dimensional square lattice, each monomer occupies four
lattice sites of a unit cell [16, 29]. Each
lattice site can at best be part of only one monomer by virtue of
self avoidance condition. We implement it on a square lattice with
lattice constant unity. Let denotes length of a bond. Minimum
bond length is . A bond length less than violates self
avoidance condition. We restrict to bond length less than . This
condition ensures that no bond crossing takes place. The possible
bond lengths
Instead of four site lattice model one can consider one site
model i.e., a monomer occupies single lattice site with
possible bond lengths between and . But in this model
there exists certain compact conformations that do not evolve; this
renders the model nonergodic
Figure (2.2) shows trapped conformations with monomers occupying single lattice site. The same conformations with possible moves in case of four site lattice model are also shown in the same figures.
We are interested in studying low temperature properties of polymer conformations. Hence we have chosen four site lattice model, which does not suffer from problems arising due to of lack of ergodicity.
2.2 Algorithm
Implementation of Bond Fluctuation model proceeds as follows.

Step 1: Start with an initial linear self avoiding conformation of a lattice polymer consisting of monomers.

Select a monomer randomly and select one of the four lattice directions randomly with equal probability.

Move the selected monomer in the selected direction by one lattice spacing. Call this a trial move.

Check if the trial move violates self avoidance condition. If it does, then reject the trial move by placing the monomer in its earlier lattice position and go to step 2.

Check if trial move increases the bond length beyond . If it does, then reject the trial move by placing the monomer in its earlier lattice position and go to step 2.

If both requirements self avoidance and bond length restrictions are met then take the trial conformation for further processing through Metropolis or entropic sampling or WangLandau algorithms. After processing go to step2.
Figure (2.3) depicts moves that are legal and those that are not legal.
2.3 Dynamics of Bond Fluctuation model
Bond Fluctuation model can be used to find dynamical properties of polymers since this model has the following characteristics.

The elementary motion is a random local move.

Excluded volume interaction among monomers is modelled through self avoidance condition.

During a move there occurs no bond intersection.

The algorithm is ergodic .
We have investigated the dynamics of the entire polymer as follows. We start with a self avoiding conformation. We select randomly and with equal probability a monomer and move it by one lattice spacing in such a way that self avoidance condition is met and no bond stretches beyond the prescribed bond length. We carry out this dynamics for a large number of Monte Carlo steps. A Monte Carlo step consists of moves where is the number of monomers on the polymer chain. The trace of the centre of mass is depicted in Fig. (2.4), which resembles that of a two dimensional Brownian motion. We have also calculated the mean square deviation of the centre mass and found that it diverges linearly with time. The loglog plot of the mean square deviation is depicted in Fig. (2.5). We get a straight line with slope nearly unity confirming that the centre of mass executes Brownian motion.
Chapter 3 Monte Carlo Simulation of Bond Fluctuation Model
Bond Fluctuation model on a two dimensional square lattice discussed in the previous chapter can be simulated by employing Metropolis algorithm. The conformations shown in Figs. (3.6, 3.7 and 3.9) are obtained by employing metropolis algorithm on a polymer of length monomers at low temperature and at high temperature respectively. A brief description of the Metropolis algorithm is given below
3.1 Metropolis algorithm
In order to calculate equilibrium properties like average energy and average radius of gyration of lattice polymers at a particular temperature, we generate a canonical ensemble by employing Markov chain Monte Carlo methods based on Metropolis algorithm [17]. Metropolis algorithm proceeds as follows.

Let be the current polymer conformation with energy

Let be the SAW conformation with energy generated employing bond fluctuating model.

If then accept trial conformation : =.

If , calculate the ratio of Boltzmann weights
. Select a random number . If accept trial conformation : ; else reject the trial conformation and set .
Iterate the whole procedure and generate a Markov chain. The asymptotic part of the Markov chain consists of conformations that belong to a canonical ensemble, at the chosen temperature. The desired macroscopic properties are calculated by taking arithmetic average over the Monte Carlo ensemble.
The conventional Markov chain Monte
Carlo methods based on Metropolis algorithm are not suitable for
calculating thermal properties like entropy and free
energies
The first nonBoltzmann Monte Carlo method called Umbrella Sampling was proposed by Torrie and Valleau [18]. Several variants of Umbrella sampling have since been proposed. They include the multi canonical Monte Carlo method of Berg and Neuhaus [19], entropic sampling of Lee [20], WangLandau algorithm [21] and several variants of WangLandau algorithm Frontier sampling [22], JSM technique [23] etc.. For an introduction to Boltzmann and nonBoltzmann Monte Carlo methods, see [24]. In the present work, we employ Wang Landau algorithm to simulate bond fluctuating lattice polymer. The algorithm is briefly described below.
3.2 WangLandau algorithm
In WangLandau algorithm we bias the Markov chain to move towards
regions of lower entropy. This is carried out as below
Algorithm

Step1 : Let denotes the density of states. In lattice polymer problem energy of the polymer equals negative of the number of nonbonded nearest neighbour contacts. The energy is thus an integer. Hence we calculate the density of states at discrete energies. Let denote the discrete density of states. Since the density of states is unknown for the system initially, start with . Take the WangLandau factor . We start with an arbitrary initial conformation
^{9} denoted by and evolve the chain as per WangLandau dynamics described below. 
Step 2: Let be the current conformation. denotes the energy histogram of conformations actually taken by the lattice polymer following WangLandau dynamics. At the beginning we set .

Step 3: Employing Bond fluctuating model construct a trial conformation

step 4: If accept trial conformation. Update and . Set and go to step 3

Step 5: If not, calculate the ratio . Call for a random number . If then accept trial conformation. Update
Set and go to step 3 
Step 6: If reject the trial conformation. Update
, ; Set and go to step3 
Step 7: Sufficiently large number of Monte Carlo sweeps are to be performed to ensure a flat histogram. Check for the flatness of the histogram i.e., all the entries in the histogram should be greater than of the average. In all the studies reported in this thesis we have taken .

step 8: When the flatness check is passed, is modified to and then go to step 2. This process is continued until i.e.,
Using the converged density of states, we can calculate micro canonical entropy: . Employing the standard machinery of thermodynamics, we can calculate all the desired macroscopic properties from the micro canonical entropy function. Helmholtz’s free energy can be calculated as
(3.1)  
(3.2)  
Internal energy can be calculated as
(3.3) 
And the specific heat can be obtained as
(3.4) 
Alternately we can generate an entropic ensemble
(3.5) 
Using this weight we can obtain canonical ensemble average of a macroscopic property say at the desired temperature from the entropic ensemble, see below.
(3.6) 
The sum runs over all the conformations of the entropic ensemble.
3.3 Results and Discussions
We have carried out nonBoltzmann Monte Carlo simulation of bond fluctuation model with and . Figure (3.2) shows the energy histogram for a polymer with monomers. We consider the energy region : to , where the histogram is reasonably flat, consistent with the flatness criterion described earlier. The micro canonical entropy is given by . Without loss of generality we set the Boltzmann factor . In this work, all the calculations were carried out by taking instead of g(E) to avoid overflow problems. Figure (3.3) shows versus .
3.3.1 Variation of energy with Temperature
As discussed in the first chapter, a compact globule structure is an equilibrium structure at low temperature and an extended coil structure is an equilibrium structure at high temperature. A compact globule structure contains more nbNN contacts compared to extended coil structure. Since for an nbNN contact, a compact globule structure has less energy compared to extended coil structure. So the average energy should be less at low temperature and high at high temperature. Figure (3.4) shows average energy calculated from both density of states and from the entropic ensemble (generated in the production run employing unweighting and reweighting factors).
3.3.2 Energy fluctuation
Energy and energy fluctuations are two important macroscopic parameters. Energy fluctuation is defined as , where the angler brackets denote an average over a canonical ensemble.
Heat capacity is defined as the thermal energy you need to supply to a macroscopic object to raise its temperature by one degree Kelvin. Thus where is the mean internal energy. We have
(3.7) 
In the above the sum over denotes a sum over all the microstates of the closed system.
If we take the partial derivative of with respect to , we get,
(3.8) 
It follows then
(3.9) 
(3.10) 
At transition temperature specific heat profile has a peak showing the
signature of the phase transition
The results on heat capacity () as a function of temperature are depicted in Fig. (3.5), for and . As the system size increases the heat capacity curves peak more and more sharply. In the Fig. (3.5) we see a sharp peak at and a broad peak at . The temperature at which is maximum gives an estimate of the transition temperature .
The broader peak corresponds to a phase transition from extended coil to compact globule structure. For a self attracting chain, this transition is caused by the competition between excluded volume repulsion and attraction due to segmentsegment interaction and configurational entropy. Transition temperature, is found to be . Figures (3.6 and 3.7) show configurations of a polymer of length monomers at temperatures , below and at , above respectively. Figure (3.6) shows a compact globule structure of a polymer of length monomers whose radius of gyration is at at . Figure (3.7) shows an extended coil structure of a polymer of length monomers whose radius of gyration is at . These conformations are obtained by simulating bond fluctuation model of isolated polymer of length monomers employing Metropolis algorithm.
Figure (3.8) shows heat capacity profile of a polymer of lengths and monomers. The heat capacity profiles have each a peak signalling coilglobule phase transition. The peaks become sharper as increases. The calculations were done considering only a narrow energy region around the broad peak depicted in Fig. (3.5). The transition temperature for a polymer of length monomers is found to be .
The sharp peak in the heat capacity profile seen at a lower temperature in Fig. (3.5), depicts a phase transition which could be the crystallization as discussed in [25] or the solidliquid transition as described in [26].
Figure (3.9) shows an extremely compact structure of a polymer of length monomers at a whose radius of gyration is . The radius of gyration of this conformation is found to be less when compared to globular structure at whose radius of gyration is .
Chapter 4 Free Energy and Landau Free Energy
4.1 Introduction
In this chapter we shall provide a brief introduction to Helmholtz free energy or simply free energy for an equilibrium system. We shall describe free energy for a closed system (canonical ensemble) and for an isolated system (microcanonical ensemble). Besides we shall consider the phenomenological free energy introduced by Landau for the bond fluctuating lattice polymer.
4.1.1 Free energy for a closed system
For a closed system, free energy is function of temperature and other thermodynamic variables like volume, and number of molecules, . It is written as
(4.1) 
In the Right Hand Side (RHS) we eliminate by expressing it as a function , and , see below.
(4.2) 
In statistical Mechanics, free energy for a closed system is related to canonical partition function, Q(T,V,N), as shown below.
(4.3)  
(4.4) 
Energy of the closed system is given by
(4.5) 
where the sum runs over all microstates of the closed system.
4.1.2 Free energy for an isolated system
For an isolated system, microcanonical free energy is a function of energy. We start with . Wang Landau algorithm gives us an estimate of entropy up to an additive constant. Microcanonical Free energy is then given by
(4.6)  
(4.7) 
4.2 Landau Free energy
Free energy is either a function of energy (for an isolated equilibrium system) or a function of Temperature (for a closed system). For any equilibrium system, isolated or closed, cannot be simultaneously a function of both energy and temperature. This is because,

An isolated system with fixed energy has a unique temperature.

A closed system at a given temperature has unique energy.
Suppose we want to estimate free energy for an energy different from the equilibrium energy . Let us denote such a free energy by the symbol , see below. Clearly,
(4.8) 
since equilibrium is characterized by minimum free energy. Notice
that in the above equation we have written as a function of
both and . This is legitimate since we are inquiring about a
system not in equilibrium. The right hand side of the above equation
is equilibrium free energy:
. The
difference
(4.9) 
can be thought of as a penalty we have to incur if we want to keep
the system in a state with energy . This corresponds to the phenomenological Landau free energy
In Eq. (4.8) equality obtains when , and denotes an average over a canonical ensemble, at temperature .
Landau free energy can be calculated as follows. In thermodynamics, start with and calculate , assuming and to be independent of each other.
In statistical mechanics we define as
(4.10) 
where the sum
is taken over all microstates of the closed system. However for a
given temperature , the contribution to the partition sum comes
predominantly from those conformations
(4.14) 
In the above if we replace U(T) by E, we get Landau free energy,
(4.15) 
Note that in the above, the presence of Dirac delta function ensures that the sum runs only over those microstates for which .
4.2.1 Free energy calculations
Employing Wang Landau algorithm to simulate bond fluctuation model, we have obtained converged density of states, . We consider all possible discrete energies of the lattice polymer. Microcanonical entropy is given by . Without loss of generality we take =1. Landau Free energy can be calculated using any one of the following two equations
(4.16)  
(4.17) 
We have used both the above expressions and found that they give the same results. We have calculated Landau free energy for lattice polymers with and monomers. The results are presented and discussed below.
4.3 Results and Discussions
From the heat capacity curve for a polymer of length we found that there are two transitions. One corresponding to transition from extended coil phase to compact globule phase at a temperature . The other corresponds to crystallization transition at temperature of .
We have checked Landau free energy profile, versus , for a polymer of length monomers for different temperatures. We found that a coilglobule transition occurs at a temperature of . Figures (4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) correspond to Landau free energy versus energy for three values of temperature, one below, one at, and one above the transition temperature of .
From these figures we see that for , there is stable minimum that corresponds to collapsed phase and and a metastable minimum that corresponds to extended coil phase. At both these phases coexist. For the extended coil phase is stable and the collapsed globule phase is meta stable. The phase transition is first order. We find that the free energy barriers are small; this is due to the fact that the lattice polymers simulated are not long.
We have calculated Landau free energy profile for the transition that corresponds to the peak in the specific heat curve at . From Fig. (3.4) we find that for a polymer of size . From Landau free energy curve the transition temperature is found to be . Figures (4.4, 4.5, 4.6) show Landau free energy energy for three values of temperature, one below, one at and one above the transition temperature, . Landau free energy curve exhibits two minima at all temperatures close to . At the polymer conformations are extremely compact. This phase is usually referred to as crystalline phase, see [25]. We find that this transition is also discontinuous.
The character of the phase transition can also be analysed using the fourth order Binder’s cumulant, [28], defined as follows.
(4.18) 
where is the energy. Binder’s reduced cumulant, are shown in Fig. (4.7) for polymers of length and . We observe that the curves are typical of discontinuous phase transition.
Chapter 5 Polymer in the presence of attractive walls
5.1 Polymer near an attractive wall
Polymer near an impenetrable attractive wall finds applications in adhesion, lubrication, colloid stabilization, chromatography, microelectronic devices, biomedical problems etc.[30]. Since the wall is attractive, the conformations that make contact with the wall have lower energy as compared to those away and not making any contact with the wall. However entropy would be smaller for polymers that make contact with the wall. These competing processes would result in adsorptiondesorption transition. If, simultaneously, there is also segmentsegment attraction in the polymer, there is a possibility of a collapse transition both in the desorbed and in the adsorbed states [31]. Since the wall is attractive, it contributes an energy for each contact the polymer makes with the wall.
A contact with the wall lowers the energy of the polymer. However it also leads to decrease in entropy. Entropy increases rather steeply with increase of energy. At any given temperature what kind of conformation a polymer takes is completely determined by the competition between energy and entropy. At low temperatures a polymer prefers to get adsorbed on the surface since it leads to lower energy. At high temperatures the polymer would prefer to move away from the wall since that facilitates increase of entropy. Hence desorbed behaviour would prevail at higher temperature.
We model the wall as a long straight polymer fixed parallel to yaxis. This fixed polymer has fixed bond length of . Each monomer of the wall occupies four lattice sites see Figs. (5.2, 5.3). Let denote the energy associated with a contact between a monomer of the polymer and that of the wall. Let be the number of contacts between the polymer and the wall. Let denote the number of nbNN contacts in the polymer. Total energy of the polymer is thus given by .
In our work we have set
. In other words the segmentsegment interaction and polymerwall interaction
are both treated in identical fashion
We have obtained converged density of states for polymer near an attractive wall. All the standard machineries we had employed and described in the third and fourth chapters are again used here to calculate heat capacity, Landau free energy and Binder’s cumulant.
The heat capacity curves for polymer of length and are shown in the Fig. (5.1). The sharp peak corresponds to transition from adsorbed collapsed state to adsorbed extended state and the transition temperature is . We conjecture that the broad shoulder corresponds to adsorptiondesorption transition. However we are not able to characterize this transition in terms of free energy profiles or Binder’s cumulant. May be we should simulate longer polymers to get calculate these quantities.
At low temperature , a part of the polymer gets
stuck to the wall and the dangling part forms a layer over it. This
results in a compact structure adsorbed to the wall with lower
energy. At high temperature
, the polymer tries
to increase its entropy by extending itself over the wall. At very
high temperatures the polymer gets detached from the wall
and behaves like an isolated polymer. Figures (5.2 and 5.3) show
conformations of a polymer of length monomers at a low
temperature and at high temperature respectively.
Figure (5.4) shows polymer far away from the wall at very high
temperature .
By analysing a narrow energy region where the coil globule transition occurs, we have obtained specific heat curves for polymer of length and monomers in the presence of the wall. These are shown in Figs. (5.5  5.8). For comparison we have reproduced the specific heat profiles for a free polymer. From the figures, for a polymer near wall is found to be less than for isolated polymer. This difference is larger for longer polymers.
From specific heat curve of a polymer of length in the presence of a wall the transition temperature is found to be . We have obtained Landau free energy profile for transition from adsorbedcollapsed state to adsorbedextended state. These are shown in Figs. (5.9, 5.10 and 5.11). From Landau free energy profile, critical temperature is found to be . The transition from adsorbedextended to adsorbedcollapsed phase is found to be first order. Figure (5.12) shows Binder’s fourth cumulant curves which again confirms that the transition is first order.
5.2 Polymer confined between two attractive walls
In this section we study coil to globule transition of a polymer confined between two attractive parallel impenetrable walls in two dimensional lattice [32]. We model the walls in the same way as we did in case of single wall. The interaction with walls is taken as the same as monomermonomer interactions. The phase transition not only depends on the monomermonomer interaction and polymer  wall interaction but also on the distance between the walls. If the walls are far separated they will have no effect on the polymer. Hence in this work we have taken the separation distance as lattice units and simulated polymers of lengths and monomers.
Employing bond fluctuation model and WangLandau algorithm we get converged density of states of a polymer confined between two walls.
Heat capacity curve shown in Fig. (5.13) gives the coil globule transition temperature as for a polymer of size monomers. Figure (5.14) shows a compact conformation of the polymer of length monomers confined between the walls separated by a distance of lattice units at low temperature of ; the radius of gyration of the polymer conformation shown in the figure is . Figure (5.15) shows extended conformation of the same polymer at high temperature of ; the radius of gyration of this conformation is . These conformations have been obtained employing Metropolis algorithm.
We have obtained Landau free energy profile for transition from extended phase to collapsed phase for a confined polymer of length . These are shown in Figs. (5.16, 5.17 and 5.18). From Landau free energy profile, critical temperature is found to be . The transition is first order. Figure (5.19) shows Binder’s fourth cumulant which confirms that the transition is discontinuous.
Chapter 6 Conclusions
In this report we have investigated the phase behaviour of a linear homopolymer. We have considered attractive interaction between segments of the polymer. We have also investigated the polymer in the presence of a single attracting wall and two walls that confine the polymer.
We have employed the Bond Fluctuation model on a two dimensional square lattice. Each monomer occupies four lattice sites. Self avoidance implies that a lattice site can at best belong to one monomer. The bond length can fluctuate between and lattice units.
We have employed Wang Landau algorithm for characterizing the phase transition in the bond fluctuating lattice polymer. WangLandau algorithm simulates an entropic ensemble, which is unphysical. Unweighting and reweighting of the conformations of the entropic ensemble are required for extracting physical canonical ensemble averages at desired temperatures. The converged density of states which is responsible for flattening of the energy histogram can be directly used for estimating microcanonical and canonical entropies and free energies besides phenomenological Landau free energy and Binder’s cumulant. We have also employed conventional Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation employing Metropolis algorithm to depict typical conformations belonging to canonical ensemble at the desired temperatures. We have simulated polymers with number of monomers ranging from to .
The principle conclusions of our study are listed below:

For a free standing polymer we find there are two transitions. The one at a higher temperature corresponds to collapse transition. The one at a lower temperature is crystallization transition. From Landau free energy profiles and Binder’s cumulant we find that both the transitions are discontinuous.

When a wall is present, we find indications of two transitions, from results on heat capacity. However we are unable to characterize the transition at higher temperature. This, we think, is due to the small size of the polymer simulated. The longest polymer we have simulated contains monomers. Our current computational facilities do not permit study of longer polymers.
The transition at the lower temperature is from adsorbedextended to adsorbedglobular phase. This transition is also first order as indicated by free energy profile as well as Binder’s cumulant.

In the presence of two confining walls, we are again able to characterize transition at lower temperature only. We find that this as collapse transition and it is discontinuous.
There are several issues we have not addressed in this report due mainly to want of computational resources. Some of these are listed below.

There is indeed a need for simulating longer polymers to characterise the phase transitions. In fact one should study polymers of different lengths, employ finite size scaling and obtain equilibrium properties in the thermodynamic limit.

There is a need to carry out a more detailed study of polymers in the presence of a single absorbing wall and a pair of walls that confine the polymer. The relative strengths of the two interactions  one between two segments of the polymer and the other between the polymer and the wall, should be varied to investigate their influence on adsorptiondesorption and coilglobule phase transitions.

Another interesting study that can be taken up is the transport of a polymer from one side to the other, through a hole in a membrane. Bond fluctuation model, which can also correctly simulate the dynamical processes in a polymer is ideally suited for investigating this problem.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful to Prof. V. S. S. Sastry for his interest in this work and for numerous discussions. We are also thankful to Ch. Sandhya for useful discussions.
It is a pleasure to acknowledge that a good part of the Monte Carlo simulations reported in this report has been carried out at the Centre for Modelling Simulation and Design (CMSD), University of Hyderabad.
Footnotes
 Radius of gyration is defined as follows. Find out center of mass of a polymer: where is the position vector of the monomer in the lattice polymer and N is the number of monomers. Calculate the distance of each monomer from the center of mass (1.1) Radius of gyration is given by (1.2)
 Consider an ensemble of random walks. To each walk we attach an energy as follows. If the walk intersects itself or if segments of walks overlap then we say the walk has energy . The Boltzmann weight of the walk is zero. If the walk is self avoiding then its energy is zero. The corresponding Boltzmann weight is unity. Thus the Boltzmann weight is either zero when it is not self avoiding and unity when it is. The Boltzmann weight is not dependent on temperature. Such an energy is called athermal energy. In fact, there is no energy scale and the statistical mechanics of self avoiding walks is completely determined by entropy.
 This is equivalent to setting RR weight to unity
 PERM stands for Pruned, Enriched Rosenbluth Model
 In three dimensional cubic lattice, each monomer occupies eight lattice sites of a cube. Bonds may have lengths ranging between and but bond vectors of the type are excluded to avoid bond crossing
 In a four site occupancy model, a monomer occupies four lattice sites.
 For a model to be ergodic we should be able to reach any conformation from any other conformation through a series of moves.
 Also Metropolis Monte Carlo techniques suffer from critical slowing down. But we shall not be concerned with these issues in the thesis
 In all our simulation we take The energy of the initial conformation is zero since there are no nonbonded nearest neighbour contacts : .
 An entropic ensemble is one in which we have equal number of lattice polymer conformations in equal intervals of energy.
 The unweighting and reweighting factors would be required whenever you generate one ensemble, say uniform ensemble and would like to calculate averages over another ensemble, say canonical ensemble.
 Strictly, should diverge at . But this would happen only in the thermodynamic limit. Due to finite size, we will get only a peak which will become sharper when the system size is larger.
 originally proposed to describe continuous phase transition; we also have GinzburgLandau free energy, proposed in the context of superconductivity and LandaudeGennes free energy, proposed in the context of liquid crystals.
 This is method of most probable values often employed in statistical mechanics, see e.g. [27]. The partition function can be written as, (4.11) At a given temperature the partition sum gets contribution predominantly from a single value of energy . We write, (4.12) (4.13) We identify as free energy, F = UTS.
 In principle one can take different from i.e. adsorption strength may be less or more compared to self interaction of polymer.
References
 P. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of chain molecules, Interscience, New York (1969);
 M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby, Polymer Physics, Oxford University Press, New York (2003).
 C. Vanderzande, Lattice Models of Polymers, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics 11, Cambridge University Press (1998).
 M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The theory of polymer Dynamics, Claren don, Oxford, (1986).
 S. M. Bhattacharjee (Ed.), Polymer Physics: 25 years of the Edwards Model, World Scientific, Singapore (1992).
 N. Madras and G. Slade, The Self Avoiding Walk, Birkhauser, Bosten BeselBerlin (1993).
 J. Mazur and F. L. McCrackin, Monte Carlo Studies of Configurational and Thermodynamic Properties of SelfInteracting Linear Polymer Chains, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 648 (1968).
 M. N. Rosenbluth and A. W. Rosenbluth, Monte Carlo Calculation of the Average Extension of Molecular Chains, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 356 (1955).
 I. Majid, N. Jan, A. Coniglio and H. E. Stanley, The kinetic growth walk: A new model for linear polymers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1257 (1984).

K. Kremer, and J. W. Lyklema, Kinetic Growth Models,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2091 (1985);
L. Pietranero, Phys. Rev. Lett., Kinetic Properties of Kinetic SelfAvoiding Walks, 55, 2025 (1985);
A. L. Stella, Phys. Rev. Lett., Survival Probability of Kinetic Selfavoiding Walks and Inherent Scaling Invariance and Universality of the Flory Approximation, 56, 2430 (1986).  S. L. Narasimhan, P. S. R. Krishna, K. P. N. Murthy and M. Ramanadham, Interacting growth walk: A model for generating compact selfavoiding walks, Phys. Rev. E 65, 010801(R) (2001).

S. L. Narasimhan, P. S. R. Krishna, A. K. Rajarajan and K. P. N.
Murthy, Interacting growth walk: A model for hyperquenched
homopolymer glass?, Phys. Rev. E 67, 011802 (2003);
S. L. Narasimhan, V. Sridhar and K. P. N. Murthy, Interacting growth walk on a honeycomb lattice, Physica A 320, 51 (2003).  P. Grassberger, Prunedenriched Rosenbluth method: Simulations of polymers of chain length up to 1000000, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3682 (1997).

S. L. Narasimhan, P. S. R. Krishna, M. Ponmurugan, and K. P. N.
Murthy, A growth walk model for estimating the canonical
partition function of interacting selfavoiding walk, J. Chem. Phy.
128, 014105 (2008);
M. Ponmurugan, V. Sridhar, S. L. Narasimhan, and K. P. N. Murthy, A flat histogram method for interacting self avoiding walks, Computational Materials Science 34, 36 (2008). 
A. D. Sokal, Monte Carlo methods for Self Avoiding Walks, preprint
helplat/9405016;
A. D. Sokal, Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science, (Ed.) K. Binder (Oxford univ. Press, Oxford, 1995).  L. Carmesin and K. Kremer, The bond fluctuation method: a new effective algorithm for the dynamics of polymers in all spatial dimensions, Macromolecules 21, 2819 (1988).
 N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. teller, and E. Teller, Equations of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
 G. Torrie and J. P. Valleau, MonteCarlo free energy estimates using nonBoltzmann sampling : Application to the subcritical LennardJones fluid, Chem. Phys. Lett. 28, 578 (1974).
 B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus, Multicanonical Algorithms for First Order Phase Transitions, Phys. Lett. B 267, 249 (1991).
 J. Lee, New Monte Carlo algorithm: Entropic sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 211 (1993); Erratum: 71, 2353 (1993).
 F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Efficient, MultipleRange Random Walk Algorithm to Calculate the Density of States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001).
 C. Zhou, T. C. Schulthess, S. Torbrugge, D. P. Landau, WangLandau Algorithm for Continuous Models and Joint Density of States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 120201 (2006).
 D. Jayasri, V. S. S. Sastry and K. P. N. Murthy, WangLandau Monte Carlo simulation of isotropicnematic transition in liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036702 (2005).
 K. P. N. Murthy, Monte Carlo Methods in statistical Physics, Universities press, Hyderabad (2004).
 F. Rampf, W. Paul and K. Binder, On the firstorder collapse transition of a threedimensional, flexible homopolymer chain model, Europhys. Lett., 70, 628634 (2005).
 D. T. Seaton , T. Wust, D. P. Landau, A WangLandau study of the phase transitions in a flexible homopolymer, Computer Physics Communications 180, 587589 (2009).
 R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics, Second Edition, Butterworth Heinmann (1961).
 K.Binder, Critical Properties from Monte Carlo Coarse Graining and Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 693 (1981).
 K. Binder, Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Polymer Science, Oxford University Press (1995).
 D. Napper,Polymeric Stabilization of Colloidal Dispersion, Academic, New York, 1983.
 N. Anastassia Rissanou, Spiros H. Anastasiadis, Ioannis A. Bitsanis, A Monte Carlo Study of the CoiltoGlobule Transition of Model Polymer Chains Near an Attractive Surface, Published online in Wiley InterScience (2009)(www.interscience.wiley.com).
 Yoshimasa Yoshida and Yasuaki Hiwatari, Properties of a Simple Polymer Chain in a Narrow Capillary2 Dimensional Monte Carlo Study, Molecular Simulation 22, 91 (1999).