Perlink Reliability and Rate Control:
Two Facets of the SIR Meta Distribution
Abstract
The meta distribution (MD) of the signaltointerference ratio (SIR) provides finegrained reliability performance in wireless networks modeled by point processes. In particular, for an ergodic point process, the SIR MD yields the distribution of the perlink reliability for a target SIR. Here we reveal that the SIR MD has a second important application, which is rate control. Specifically, we calculate the distribution of the SIR threshold (equivalently, the distribution of the transmission rate) that guarantees each link a target reliability and show its connection to the distribution of the perlink reliability. This connection also permits an approximate calculation of the SIR MD when only partial (local) information about the underlying point process is available.
I Introduction
When the wireless node locations are modeled by a point process, the meta distribution (MD) of the signaltointerference ratio (SIR) provides refined network performance by calculating the perlink reliability [1]. Specifically, for a point process of transmitters, the conditional success probability (equivalently, the reliability) of a link is given by
(1) 
where is the SIR threshold. In (1), averaging is done over the fading and the channel access scheme. The SIR MD at the typical link is obtained by averaging over the point process as
(2) 
where is the reliability threshold. In (2), depending on the network model, we may need to use the reduced Palm measure instead of the probability measure given that an active transmitter is present at a prescribed location and the SIR is calculated at its associated receiver. For an ergodic point process model, the SIR MD can be interpreted as the fraction of links or users that achieve a reliability at least for a target SIR in each realization of .
A simple way to guarantee each link a target reliability in each realization of is to control the (bandwidthnormalized) transmission rate , which depends on the SIR threshold through the spectral efficiency as .
In rate control, for a random , the SIR threshold for which a link achieves the target reliability is random. Let denote this random SIR threshold at the typical user. The complementary cumulative distribution function (ccdf) of for a target reliability of is denoted by
(3) 
It determines the rate distribution via .
Related work
The SIR MD is calculated for the spectrum sharing between the devicetodevice (D2D) and cellular users in [2] and for millimeterwave D2D networks in [3]. The works in [1, 2, 3] take an approach where each link is subjected to the same SIR threshold and calculate the fraction of links that satisfy a target reliability in each realization of . Using the tool of the SIR MD, [4] calculates the spatial outage capacity, which is the maximum density of concurrently active links that meet a target success probability. In [5], the approach of rate control is used to achieve a high reliability given only the knowledge of the nearest interferer’s location. In [6], given the different levels of knowledge about the point process, the success probability of a transmission is predicted. This paper takes a dual approach to [1] (and similar to [5]) in that the SIR threshold is adjusted to meet the target reliability.
Contributions
This paper reveals the two interpretations of the SIR MD—the perlink reliability distribution and the rate distribution. Specifically, it makes the following contributions:

For a wireless network modeled by a stationary and ergodic point process, we prove that calculating the SIR MD as a function of the SIR threshold is equivalent to calculating the SIR threshold distribution such that each link is guaranteed a target reliability of (Thm. 1), i.e.,

We also show that the rate distribution facilitates the calculation of the throughput density.
Ii Duality in the Interpretation of the SIR MD
Theorem 1.
For any stationary and ergodic point process , given a target reliability ,
(4) 
Proof:
For a target reliability , the SIR MD as a function of the SIR threshold is
where in step , denotes the SIR cdf conditioned on . In step , denotes the inverse conditional cdf of the SIR. Since is continuous and strictly increasing, is the unique number such that . In step ,
(5) 
Here is random since is random. Given , we have such that
(6) 
Corollary 1.
The distribution of the transmission rate is
(8) 
Proof:
The rate distribution follows from and Thm. 1. ∎
Thm. 1 and Cor. 1 reveal two facets of the SIR MD:

For fixed SIR threshold , is the perlink reliability distribution.

For fixed reliability threshold , is the distribution of the conditional SIR threshold (equivalently, rate distribution).
Intuitively, Thm. 1 can be explained as follows. For a given SIR threshold and target reliability , in a realization of the network, let us assume that the typical link^{1}^{1}1We add a link whose receiver is at the origin. Under the expectation over , this link becomes the typical link. In a realization of , however, with a slight abuse of terminology, we term this link the typical link even before taking the expectation. achieves a reliability of . If , the SIR threshold can be increased until . Contrary, if , the SIR threshold needs to be decreased such that . Hence the probability that the typical link achieves a reliability of is the same as the probability that the SIR threshold for which the typical link achieves a reliability of exactly is greater than .
Iii The Case of Poisson Bipolar Networks
In this section, we study the rate control performance in Poisson bipolar networks [7], which can be used to model infrastructureless wireless networks such as ad hoc, D2D, M2M, and V2V networks.
Iiia Network Model
The transmitter locations follow a homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP) of density . Each transmitter has an associated receiver at a distance of in a uniformly random direction. Each transmitter transmits at unit power. We assume Rayleigh fading with the channel power gain distributed as the exponential random variable with mean . A transmission is subject to the path loss as , where is the distance and is the path loss exponent. We focus on the interferencelimited case. We add a transmitter at the location and its receiver at the origin . The link between this transmitterreceiver pair becomes the typical link under the expectation over .
IiiB Perlink Reliability and Rate Control
Fig. 1 visualizes Thm. 1 and reveals the ratereliability tradeoff. Fig. LABEL:sub@fig:ps_dist shows what reliabilities links in a realization of the Poisson bipolar network achieve for a given SIR threshold . For this realization, out of links achieve a reliability greater than the target reliability of . On the other hand, for the same realization, Fig. LABEL:sub@fig:theta_dist shows what SIR threshold is set at each link to achieve exactly the target reliability. For those links that achieve a reliability greater than (see Fig. LABEL:sub@fig:ps_dist), the SIR threshold can be set above the deterministic SIR threshold of such that the links achieve exactly the target reliability (see Fig. LABEL:sub@fig:theta_dist). For the links with smaller reliability than , the SIR threshold needs to be lowered so that those links meet the target reliability.
IiiC Distribution of the SIR Threshold
Theorem 2.
The random SIR threshold that guarantees a target reliability of is the solution of
(9) 
Proof:
The conditional success probability is given by
(10) 
where step follows from averaging over the channel power gain of the desired link and step follows from averaging over the channel power gains of the interfering links.
Conditioned on , is the SIR threshold such that . For a random , is a random variable. ∎
Remark 1.
Although in most cases, it is impossible to express in an exact closedform, it can be computed numerically with ease. Thanks to Thm. 1, the distribution of can be exactly calculated from an already known exact expression of obtained via the GilPelaez inversion [1]. It can also be efficiently calculated by the binomial mixtures method [8].
We now discuss some cases of practical importance where we can express in a quasiclosedform and calculate its distribution. For this purpose, we use the following lemma.
Lemma 1.
The relation between the geometric mean and the arithmetic mean gives rise to
(11) 
In Lemma 1, the interference only from nearest interferers is considered, where is the th interferer’s distance from the typical receiver (i.e., ).
IiiC1 Ultrareliable regime ()
The ultrareliable regime corresponds to the regime where the target outage probability goes to 0, i.e., . For this regime, the following theorem calculates the distribution of .
Theorem 3.
For ,
(12) 
where
(13) 
denotes the interference without fading.
Proof:
See the appendix. ∎
For , is available in a quasiclosedform [9, Chapter 5], which results in
(14) 
where denotes the complementary error function.
Remark 2.
In (14), the ratio of (rate) and (reliability) highlights the ratereliability tradeoff.
IiiC2 Availability of partial (local) information about
In this case the knowledge of the locations of only a few nearest interferers is available. For this, the following theorem provides an approximate expression of the SIR threshold .
Theorem 4.
For any and any ,
(15) 
For , the bound in (15) provides an approximation as
(16) 
where is given by (13). An approximate distribution of in a quasiclosedform follows as
(17) 
Fig. 2 shows that the empirical distribution of obtained using the bound given by (15) is quite tight for small values of the SIR threshold . In fact, it is not necessary to have the entire information about the point process , i.e., the locations of all interferers, to obtain a good approximation of .
IiiD Throughput Density
The distribution of allows us to calculate the throughput density [5], which is defined as
(18) 
This throughput density metric takes into account all the links, which includes unreliable links for which . The second throughput metric, termed the reliable throughput density, considers only reliable links and is given by
(19) 
where denotes the indicator function.
IiiD1 Rate control approach
Since each link achieves the target reliability, we have and . It follows that
(20) 
and
(21) 
For , using (17), we can calculate , which gives rise to
(22) 
where , is a hypergeometric function, is the imaginary error function, and is Euler’s constant.
IiiD2 Deterministic SIR threshold approach
The throughput densities are calculated by replacing the random in (18) and (19) by the deterministic SIR threshold . It follows that
(23) 
and
(24) 
where is the standard success probability and is the SIR MD. For the network model considered in this paper, from [1], we have . can be calculated using the GilPelaez inversion [1].
Fig. 3 shows that when only reliable links are considered to calculate the throughput density, the rate control approach outperforms the deterministic SIR threshold (i.e., without rate control) approach since all links are reliable in the former and only a fraction of links are reliable in the latter. When unreliable links are also considered, the tradeoff between the rate and the reliability causes the rate control approach to perform better at low and high SIR thresholds. For the rest of the SIR threshold values, the rate control leads to smaller rates in an effort to make all links reliable and performs worse than the deterministic SIR threshold approach. The throughput densities for the rate control approach remain the same as they depend only on the average rate and the transmitter density.
Iv Conclusions
For any wireless network modeled by a stationary and ergodic point process, we revealed that rate control is a facet of the SIR MD and showed its connection to the perlink reliability—another facet of the SIR MD. This connection permits the calculation of the rate distribution and highlights the ratereliability tradeoff. Since the rate control guarantees each link an arbitrary target reliability, it facilitates ultrareliable communication.
Proof of Thm. 3
The bound in (11) becomes exact as because the term in (9) (hence the term in (11)) approaches and hence the geometric mean approaches the arithmetic mean. Consequently, from (9) and (11), we have
(25) 
which yields the exact expression of in the ultrareliable regime (i.e., as ) as
(26) 
The exact distribution of follows as
References
 [1] M. Haenggi, “The meta distribution of the SIR in Poisson bipolar and cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2577–2589, Apr. 2016.
 [2] M. Salehi, A. Mohammadi, and M. Haenggi, “Analysis of D2D underlaid cellular networks: SIR meta distribution and mean local delay,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2904–2916, Jul. 2017.
 [3] N. Deng and M. Haenggi, “A finegrained analysis of millimeterwave devicetodevice networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4940–4954, Nov. 2017.
 [4] S. S. Kalamkar and M. Haenggi, “The spatial outage capacity of wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 3709–3722, Jun. 2018.
 [5] S. S. Kalamkar and M. Haenggi, “Distributed rate control for high reliability in Poisson bipolar networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), (Singapore), Dec. 2017, pp. 1–6.
 [6] S. Weber, “The value of observations in predicting transmission success in wireless networks under slotted ALOHA,” in Proc. International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt’17), (Paris, France), May 2017, pp. 1–8.
 [7] F. Baccelli, B. Błaszczyszyn, and P. Mühlethaler, “An ALOHA protocol for multihop mobile wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 421–436, Feb. 2006.
 [8] M. Haenggi, “Efficient calculation of meta distributions and the performance of user percentiles,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 982–985, Dec. 2018.
 [9] M. Haenggi, Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.