Orbital Solution for the Spectroscopic Binary in the GW Ori Hierarchical Triple

Orbital Solution for the Spectroscopic Binary in the GW Ori Hierarchical Triple

Abstract

We present the first double-lined orbital solution for the close binary in the GW Ori triple system. Using 12 epochs of infrared spectroscopy, we detected the lines of both stars in the inner pair, previously known as single-lined only. Our preliminary infrared orbital solution has an eccentricity of , a period of days, and a mass ratio of . We find a larger semi-amplitude for the primary star, km s, with an infrared-only solution compared to km s with optical data from the literature, likely the result of line blending and veiling in the optical. The component spectral types correspond to G3 and K0 stars, with values of 43 km s and 50 km s, respectively. We obtained a flux ratio of 0.58 0.14 in the H-band, allowing us to estimate individual masses of 3.2 and 2.7 M for the primary and secondary, respectively, using evolutionary tracks. The tracks also yield a coeval age of 1 Myr for both components to within 1. GW Ori is surrounded by a circumbinary/circumtriple disk. A tertiary component has been detected in previous studies; however, we did not detect this component in our near-infrared spectra, probably the result of its relative faintness and blending in the absorption lines of these rapidly rotating stars. With these results, GW Ori joins the small number of classical T Tauri, double-lined spectroscopic binaries.

binaries: spectroscopic — stars: pre-main sequence — techniques: radial velocities

1 Introduction

Measurements of stellar masses are fundamental to our understanding of the formation and evolution of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars because mass determines the manner of a star’s birth and early development, and likely plays a role in the planet formation properties of a system. Short-period binaries provide an ideal means to precise dynamical mass determination because observations sampling repeated orbits are achievable in months to years time scales. Mass ratio distributions also yield insight into binary formation mechanisms, which are important to explore as most low-mass young stars are located in binary and multiple systems (e.g., Simon et al., 1995). To measure absolute masses and to determine the young binary mass ratio distribution with high statistical significance, it is necessary to determine precise properties for a larger sample of low mass spectroscopic binaries (SBs) than is presently available, i.e. for hundreds of systems rather than dozens. This work represents part of that effort.

GW Ori was originally described as a single-line SB classical T Tauri system with a nearly circular orbit and an orbital period of 242 days (Mathieu et al., 1991). Mathieu et al. (1991) found a primary component with a value of 40 km s and effective temperature () of 6000 K from cross-correlating with a synthetic spectrum. They estimated masses of 2.5 M and 0.5 M for the primary and secondary components, respectively. Analysis of RV residuals identified evidence for a third companion. All three stars were angularly resolved interferometrically in the H-band by Berger et al. (2011), who obtained an image of GW Ori as a triple system with an inner binary separation of 1.4 AU and a third component with a projected separation of 8 AU. Using a primary component temperature of 5700 K at an age of 10 Myrs, Berger et al. (2011) calculated a primary mass of 3.6 M. The presence of near- and far-infrared (IR) excesses was inferred from the GW Ori spectra and explained by modeling circumprimary and circumbinary disks (Mathieu et al., 1991).

GW Ori is one of the few PMS SBs to host both circumbinary and circumstellar material (Basri et al., 1997; Jensen & Mathieu, 1997; Prato et al., 2002b; Kellogg et al., 2017). These systems are important because they potentially support circumstellar and circumbinary planet formation; some research indicates a paucity of planet formation in the closest binary systems (e.g., Kraus et al., 2016). Also, classical T Tauri SBs challenge our understanding of mass transfer from circumbinary to circumstellar disks and may represent a transitory evolutionary phase. Finally, SBs with circumbinary material potentially provide precise component stellar mass measurements (e.g., Simon et al., 2017), as well as disk mass estimates (Andrews & Williams, 2005), which would greatly inform our understanding of the star-disk interaction.

The use of infrared spectroscopy in observations of SBs permits the detection of photospheric lines in the fainter, redder secondary star, given the much more favorable secondary/primary flux ratio at longer wavelengths, compared to the optical, in which the stars’ spectral energy distributions (SEDs) are in the Raleigh-Jeans regime (e.g., Prato et al., 2002a). We successfully obtained the double-lined orbital parameters for the GW Ori SB. We briefly describe our observations (§2), analysis and results (§3), and discuss the properties of this complex T Tauri triple (§4).

2 Observations and Data Reduction

We used the facility near-IR spectrograph, NIRSPEC, at the Keck II telescope on Mauna Kea (McLean et al., 1998, 2000). With a 0288 (2 pixel) slit width, the spectral resolution is 30,000 (8 km s). Our observations were centered in the -band on order 49 (1.545–1.565 m), a region almost entirely free of telluric absorption (Rousselot et al., 2000). Multiple epochs of IR spectra were obtained for GW Ori from 2002–2010; specific dates appear in Table 1. The observations were taken in ABBA nod sequences to allow for subtraction of the sky background and bad pixels. The spectra were extracted with REDSPEC4, designed for the analysis of NIRSPEC data (Kim et al., 2015). The reduced and barycentric corrected spectra are shown in Figure 1. Further details may be found in Ruíz-Rodríguez et al. (e.g., 2013).

3 Analysis and Results

To measure the RVs for the stellar components of the GW Ori SB, we cross-correlated our observed spectra against a grid of template spectra rotationally broadened to different values of (Mace et al., 2012). Unfortunately, as illustrated in Figure  1, the spectral lines are very broad, making the process of measuring the RVs more challenging (Ruíz-Rodríguez et al., 2013). Absorption line veiling as the result of accretion and photometric variability, for example from cool star spots, can also impact the cross-correlation. We follow the approach of Zucker & Mazeh (1994) with a similar algorithm. Given the variability and veiling, we measured the average of the flux ratios, , calculated only for the phases with the largest radial velocity semi-amplitudes. We then repeated the cross-correlations, holding this value fixed for all phases.

The best fit between our observed spectra and the grid of template spectra was found using a G3V (HD 1835), with km s, for the primary star and a K0V (BS 7368), with km s, for the secondary. The flux ratio, 0.58 0.14, was held constant for all final cross-correlations. Remarkably, this ratio is almost equal to the weighted average H-band flux ratio determined by Berger et al. (2011), 0.57 0.05, on the basis of their visibility and closure phase modeling analysis. We did not detect the tertiary component, likely because of veiling and the blending of the spectral lines in the rapidly rotating primary and secondary stars. In Table  1, we provide the GW Ori IR RV measurements and the barycentric Julian dates of the observations. Uncertainties in the IR RVs, determined following the procedure outlined in Mace et al. (2012) and Ruíz-Rodríguez et al. (2013), were 1.8 km s for the primary and 2.0 km s for the secondary.

We used the Levenberg-Marquardt approach (Press et al., 1992) to derive the orbital elements for the inner binary on the basis of the IR RVs (Table 2). The RVs show a large scatter of 1–3 from the orbital fit, likely resulting from contamination by the tertiary spectrum, as well as line-blending, veiling, and strong and variable IR excess in the system. Our orbital solution is shown in Figure  2. We followed the same approach to fit a single-lined solution to the optical RVs (Mathieu et al., 1991); these optical data and our corresponding orbital fit are also shown in Figure  2. For the optical data we found km s, compared to km s for the IR-only solution; the smaller amplitude of the optical-only orbital solution is likely the outcome of bias from blending of the broad lines, given the large , and veiling in the optical. The blended lines of the tertiary component could in principle impact the IR RVs and orbital solution in particular; however, even with the more favorable flux ratio in the IR, the tertiary is much fainter than the SB components and its small mass is unlikely to cause perceptible effects, particularly over the three years during which almost all of the IR data were taken.

4 Discussion and Conclusions

The IR orbit presented here is likely to be relatively accurate but lacks precision. A dozen observations is close to the lower limit for the derivation of an SB orbit. Hence, the parameters presented in Table 2 have large associated uncertainties. However, there is value in the publication of such a preliminary orbit because knowledge of the component mass and flux ratios, only possible with the IR detection of the secondary, are of value for other investigations (e.g., Czekala et al. 2017). Furthermore, a system such as the GW Ori SB, with a period of 241 days, requires a long term investment of at least several years and flexible scheduling with a high-resolution IR spectrograph to obtain the desirable phase coverage required for a more precise orbital solution. Because the tertiary component in this young star triple system is significantly fainter and likely much less massive than the SB components, its impact on the solution presented here is likely minimal. Additional observations should be taken in order to improve the phase coverage and precision, but publication of this preliminary orbit will serve to optimize future efforts.

GW Ori is one of a handful of pre-main sequence SBs with a circumbinary disk and active accretion, implying the presence of circumstellar material as well. Other objects in this category include V4046 Sgr (Stempels & Gaum 2004), AK Sco (Andersen et al. 1989), DQ Tau (Mathieu et al. 1997), UZ Tau E (Prato et al. 2002b), TWA 3 (Kellogg et al., 2017), and AS 205 (Eisner et al. 2005). Apart from DQ Tau, all of these systems have companions at separations of tens to thousands of AU and ages of 1 to 12 Myr. The periods of the spectroscopic orbits cover a range from 2 days to 12 years and the eccentricities from 0 to 0.6. The mass ratios of these systems span 0.3 to 1.0 and they are located in a variety of star forming regions. Thus, there seem to be no unifying properties to this accreting sample of young SBs.

The discovery of planets in orbit around main sequence SBs (e.g., Doyle et al., 2011) underscores the potential importance of studying circumbinary disks. Photometric and spectroscopic monitoring programs of the binary orbits and pulsed accretion in DQ Tau (Basri et al. 1997), UZ Tau E (Jensen et al. 2007), and TWA 3 (Tofflemire et al., 2017) demonstrate the direct link between the circumbinary disk, properties of the binary stars, and stimulation of the accretion process. It may also be possible to connect the disk and accretion characteristics to the binary’s angular momentum; with observed component values of 4050 km s, the stars in the inner GW Ori binary are relatively rapid rotators.

Rosero et al. (2011) discussed the possibility of Kozai perturbations in the 3 day orbital period binary RX J1622.7Ð2325Nw as the source of the system’s unusually large eccentricity, 0.3. For orbital period of less than a few days, normally the eccentricity would be zero (e.g., Melo et al. 2001). In the GW Ori SB, with of only 0.21, some circularization may have already taken place even at an age of only 1 Myr. Both SBs have companions at similar projected separations, 100 AU, although RX J1622.7Ð2325Nw hosts no disk material. Also, the RX J1622.7Ð2325Nw companion is itself a close binary and roughly equal in total mass to the SB. The GW Ori SB is probably at least a factor of 5 greater in mass than the tertiary (Berger et al. 2011); it is unlikely that this companion has an impact of the same magnitude on the SB as the companion in the RX J1622.7Ð2325Nw system. It is possible that the complex circumbinary and circumstellar disk material in concert with the dynamical action of the tertiary in the GW Ori system may be responsible for some degree of rapid damping of the binary eccentricity. With only 12 epochs of IR data, the may be smaller than determined here and more in line with the value determined in our fit to the optical-only data.

We used the H-band flux ratios for the component pairs given in Table 2 of Berger et al. (2011) to calculate the flux ratio of the inner, spectroscopic binary to the tertiary component, 6.58 2.96. Combined with the total H-band magnitude of the system, 7.103 0.029 mag, we then determined the apparent H magnitude of the spectroscopic binary to be 7.26 0.07 mag. Using our flux ratio for the spectroscopic binary components, 0.58 0.14, determined from the cross-correlation of multiple epochs and in agreement with that of Berger et al. (2011) (§3), we then derived the individual apparent H-band magnitudes for each star in the inner binary, 7.76 0.12 mag for the primary and 8.35 0.18 mag for the secondary. Applying a distance modulus corresponding to the 414 7 pc distance to Orion (Menten et al., 2007), we found absolute H magnitudes of and for the primary and secondary, respectively. The final uncertainties represent the error propagation of the uncertainties in the 2MASS H-magnitude, the flux ratios, and the distance.

Values for the SB components’ were estimated using the spectral types determined from the cross-correlation and adopting the temperature scale illustrated in Figure 5 of Luhman et al. (2003). We found 5780 100 K for the primary and 5250 100 K for the secondary; the uncertainties of 100 K correspond to 1 spectral subclasses. To estimate the individual masses and age of the system, we plotted the GW Ori SB components on the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram and compared them to the evolutionary models of Dotter et al. (2008) (Figure 3). For the primary and secondary masses we found 3.2 M and 2.7 M, respectively. Uncertainties are approximately 0.2 and the mass ratio is 0.84 0.08. From our cross-correlation of the spectra we found a value for the mass ratio of , less than that calculated from the tracks, although within 1 of that value given the uncertainties of 10% or more in both mass ratios. This discrepancy may be the result of excess flux from the secondary star in the SB. Given that the components are of unequal mass, and the system is embedded in a complex circumbinary/circumtriple disk structure, yet shows evidence for active accretion, the lower mass secondary in a larger radius orbit may be preferentially accreting, increasing its H-band flux and hence the mass derived from the HR Diagram (Figure 3). We find a total mass of 5.9 M for the inner binary, well within 1 of that calculated by Berger et al. (2011), 5.6 M. Both component fall within 1 of the 1 Myr isochrone.

We used the track-derived masses and and from Table 2 to estimate the SB’s inclination and found values of and , respectively, consistent with the results of Berger et al. (2011) for a lower inclination than previously identified (Shevchenko et al., 1998). Given this low inclination, it is unlikely that the stellar components in the GW Ori SB are eclipsing. A potential origin for the intermittent dimming observed in the system (e.g., Shevchenko et al., 1998) could arise from clumpy accretion (e.g., Graham, 1992) onto the secondary star in a stream from the circumbinary/circumtriple disk structure with a geometry such that eclipses of one of the stars by the accretion stream, with the period of the SB, is observable. Torques on the system could alter the geometry of the accretion stream and/or disks, compounding the aperiodic accretion action and leading to the intermittent nature of the dimming. A misalignment between the SB and the disk material could support this hypothesis.

Using high-resolution, IR spectroscopy, we have determined the first double-lined solution for the inner SB in the GW Ori system. Our results are consistent with a 1 Myr system of relatively massive stars, 3.2 d 2.7 M, with at least one component undergoing active accretion. The orbital solution presented here indicates that the system is relatively close to face-on and that the periodic dimming observed between 1987 and 1992 was unlikely the result of eclipsing stellar components; however, periodic occultations of one of the stars by circumstellar or streaming circumbinary material could explain this phenomenon. GW Ori provides an important opportunity for detailed study of multiple star and disk evolution, and for the interaction of circumbinary/circumtriple and circumstellar disk material.

The authors thank G. Torres for helpful insights and comments and O. Franz and E. Jensen for discussions about this important system. We are grateful to the Keck Observatory OAs and SAs for their expert assistance. This research was supported in part by NSF grants AST-1009136 and AST-1518081. Partial support was also provided by the NASA Keck PI Data Awards, administered by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. This research has made use of data products from the SIMBAD reference database, the NASA Astrophysics Data System, and the Two Micron All Sky Survey, a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. Data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory from telescope time allocated to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the agencyÕs scientific partnership with the California Institute of Technology and the University of California. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We recognize and acknowledge the significant cultural role that the summit of Mauna Kea plays within the indigenous Hawaiian community and are grateful for the opportunity to conduct observations from this special mountain.
UT Date BJD v5 v6 Orbital Phase
(km s) (km s) (km s) (km s)
2001 Jan 05 2451914.84608 30.20 27.26 0.2017
2001 Oct 10 2452192.70857 29.75 17.82 0.3539
2001 Dec 29 2452272.86298 25.76 32.96 0.6863
2002 Feb 05 2452310.84005 19.27 34.99 0.8438
2002 Oct 30 2452578.09003 21.29 34.46 0.9520
2002 Dec 14 2452622.94721 25.61 34.53 0.1381
2002 Dec 22 2452631.01035 26.30 30.49 0.1715
2003 Feb 08 2452678.87603 34.32 19.03 0.3700
2003 Nov 04 2452948.16698 34.33 18.63 0.4867
2004 Jan 26 2453030.93007 22.92 36.75 0.8299
2004 Dec 26 2453365.96450 27.53 31.83 0.2193
2010 Dec 12 2455543.08232 29.52 24.04 0.2475
Table 1: Infrared Radial Velocities
Parameter Property
P (days) 241.15 0.72
(km s)
(km s)
(km s)
e
(deg)
(BJD)
sin (M)
sin (M)
sin (10 km)
sin (10 km)
Table 2: Results of Infrared Orbital Fit
Figure 1: GW Ori reduced and barycentric corrected spectra, vertically offset by a constant. Barycentric Julian dates are noted under the spectrum for each epoch (Table 1).
Figure 2: Data and orbital solutions for the GW Ori inner spectroscopic binary. Filled circles represent the IR RVs for the secondary while the filled squares show the IR data for the primary; open squares represent the optical data for the primary from Mathieu et al. (1991). The best fit from the IR data alone is shown in red, with a solid line for the primary component and a dashed line for the secondary component. Error bars correspond to uncertainties in the IR of 1.8 and 2.0 km s for the primary and secondary stars, respectively. We assigned uncertainties of 1.3 km s to the optical data points. A solid black line shows our orbital fit to the optical data for the primary, similar to the fit reported in Mathieu et al. (1991). See text for discussion.
Figure 3: Absolute H magnitude versus effective temperature for the GW Ori spectroscopic binary components shown with the pre-main-sequence evolutionary tracks of Dotter et al. (2008). Solid lines represent 1 and 3 Myr isochrones, from top to bottom. Dotted lines show the mass tracks in a range between 2 M and 4 M in intervals of 0.2 M. Mass tracks of 2, 3 and 4 M are highlighted in thick dotted blue lines. Filled red circles represent the primary and secondary components.

Footnotes

  1. affiliation: Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA; lprato@lowell.edu
  2. affiliation: Center for Imaging Science, School of Physics & Astronomy, and Laboratory for Multiwavelength Astrophysics, Rochester Institute of Technology, 54 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
  3. affiliation: Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA; lprato@lowell.edu
  4. https://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/nirspec/redspec.html
  5. Primary star RV uncertainty is 1.8 km s.
  6. Secondary star RV uncertainty is 2.0 km s.

References

  1. Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1134
  2. Basri, G., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Mathieu, R. D. 1997, AJ, 114, 781
  3. Berger, J.-P., Monnier, J. D., Millan-Gabet, R., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L1
  4. Czekala, I., Andrews, S. M., Torres, G., et al. 2017, arXiv:1710.03153
  5. Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremović, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89
  6. Doyle, L. R., Carter, J. A., Fabrycky, D. C., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 1602
  7. Graham, J. A. 1992, PASP, 104, 479
  8. Jensen, E. L. N., & Mathieu, R. D. 1997, AJ, 114, 301
  9. Kellogg, K., Prato, L., Torres, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 168
  10. Kim, S., Prato, L., & McLean, I. 2015, REDSPEC: NIRSPEC data reduction, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1507.017
  11. Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Huber, D., Mann, A. W., & Dupuy, T. J. 2016, AJ, 152, 8
  12. Luhman, K. L., Briceño, C., Stauffer, J. R., et al. 2003, ApJ, 590, 348
  13. Mace, G. N., Prato, L., Torres, G., et al. 2012, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1206.3329
  14. Mathieu, R. D., Adams, F. C., & Latham, D. W. 1991, AJ, 101, 2184
  15. McLean, I. S., Graham, J. R., Becklin, E. E., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4008, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood, 1048–1055
  16. McLean, I. S., Becklin, E. E., Bendiksen, O., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3354, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. A. M. Fowler, 566–578
  17. Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., & Brunthaler, A. 2007, A&A, 474, 515
  18. Prato, L., Simon, M., Mazeh, T., et al. 2002a, ApJ, 569, 863
  19. Prato, L., Simon, M., Mazeh, T., Zucker, S., & McLean, I. S. 2002b, ApJL, 579, L99
  20. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing, ed. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P.
  21. Rousselot, P., Lidman, C., Cuby, J.-G., Moreels, G., & Monnet, G. 2000, AA, 354, 1134
  22. Ruíz-Rodríguez, D., Prato, L., Torres, G., Wasserman, L. H., & Neuhäuser, R. 2013, AJ, 145, 162
  23. Shevchenko, V. S., Grankin, K. N., Mel’Nikov, S. Y., & Lamzin, S. A. 1998, Astronomy Letters, 24, 528
  24. Simon, M., Ghez, A. M., Leinert, C., et al. 1995, ApJ, 443, 625
  25. Simon, M., Guilloteau, S., Di Folco, E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 158
  26. Tofflemire, B. M., Mathieu, R. D., Herczeg, G. J., Akeson, R. L., & Ciardi, D. R. 2017, ApJ, 842, L12
  27. Torres, G. 2001, AJ, 121, 2227
  28. Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 1994, ApJ, 420, 806
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
127829
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description