Optomechanical devices based on travelingwave microresonators
Abstract
We theoretically study the unique applications of optomechanics based on travelingwave microresonators, where the optomechanical coupling of degenerate modes can be enhanced selectively by optically pumping in different directions. We show that the unique features of degenerate optical modes can be applied to the entangled photon generation of clockwise and counterclockwise optical modes, and the nonclassicality of entangled photon pair is discussed. The coherent coupling between the clockwise and counterclockwise optical mods and two acoustic modes is also studied, in which the relative phase of the optomechanical couplings plays a key role in the optical nonreciprocity. The paritytime symmetry of acoustic modes can be observed in the slightly deformed microresonator with the interaction of forward and backward stimulated Brillouin Scattering in the tripleresonance system. In addition, the degenerate modes are in the decoherencefree subspace, which is robust against environmental noises. Based on parameters realized in recent experiments, these optomechanical devices should be readily achievable.
pacs:
42.50.Wk, 42.50.Ex, 07.10.Cm, 11.30.ErI Introduction
Optomechanical devices Aspelmeter2014 (); Kippenberg2008 (); Aspelmeyer2012 (); Thourhout2010 (); Hong2013 () have attracted considerable attentions in integrated photonic circuits Tang1 (); Eichenfield2009 (); Fan2016 (), memory Tang2 (); Cole2011 () and high precision measurements Anetsberger2010 (); Weber2016 (); OckeloenKorppi2016 () for practical applications. There are also excellent test bed for investigating the quantum behaviors at macroscopic level Purdy2013 () and are attractive for fundamental studies on physics, such as the gravitational wave detection Aspelmeter2014 (); Aasi2013 (); Belenchia2016 (), quantumtoclassical transitions Ludwig2008 (); Brennecke2008 (), and quantum information processing Khalili2010 (); Stannigel2012 (). In past few years, many remarkable progresses have been achieved both in theory and experiment, such as ground state cooling of the mechanical resonator Teufel2011 (), optomechanically induced transparency Weis2010 (); SafaviNaeini2011 (), optomechanical entanglement Palomaki2013 () and squeezing Wollman2015 (), and optical frequency conversion Dong2012 (); Andrews2014 ().
Recently, more and more studies on multimode optomechanics (MOM) Aspelmeter2014 () have been carried out, for more functional devices and applications. Because they provide more degrees of freedom, people can realize new phenomena that are not possible in single mode optomechanical systems, such as the optical nonreciprocity Xu2015 (); Meltelmann2015 (); Peano2016 (), paritytime symmetry Peng2014 (), chiral symmetry breaking Wurl2016 (), and topological energy transfer HXu2016 (). Different from the tripleresonance enhanced optomechanical interaction phononlaser (); Zhu (), the MOM in this paper is referring to more than one optical signal mode or mechanical mode. Many schemes Stannigel2012 (); Buchmann2015 (); Kipf2014 (); Chesi2015 () have been proposed to realize the MOM Deng2016 () based on the coupled cavities or hybrid optomechanical systems. However, in practical physical systems, it is challenging to fabricate multiple optical or mechanical resonators that have the frequencies matching each other. In additional to the frequency mismatching problem, the MOM also requires complex design for the efficient coupling between separated resonators.
In this paper, we propose to use the travelingwave microresonators to explore the MOM, which allows many potential new phenomena and applications. The whisperinggallery microcavities Dong2012 (); Park2009 (); Balram2014 (); Baker2014 (); Grudinin2009 (); Bahl2011 (); Bahl2012 () is one of the candidate systems, which supports degenerate clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) travelingwave modes, which have already been used in optomechanically induced nonreciprocity Shen2016 (); Ruesink2016 (); Kim2015 (); Dong2015 (). By using the degenerate oppositely propagating optical modes, we demonstrate the entangled photon generation and the controllable optical nonreciprocity. The CW and CCW acoustic waves also enable the study of the nonHermitian dynamics of phonons, and the paritytime symmetry of acoustic modes is proposed in the slightly deformed travelingwave microresonator. The travelingwave microresonator provides an excellent platform for studying the optomechanics with multiple degrees of freedom, and the schemes proposed in this work are feasible for experiments. The integration of all modes in single solid state microresonator also holds the great advantage that the noise of degenerate CW and CCW travelingwave modes could cancel each other, where the mode pair actually forms a decoherencefree subspace, which makes optomechanical devices robust against environmental noises and holds great potential for applications in quantum information processing.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we show the CW and CCW travelingwave modes in travelingwave microresonators, and develop the Hamiltonian description of the MOM. Based on this model, we propose three unique applications in this system: the entangled photon generation of CW and CCW modes in Sec. III, the nonreciprocal conversion between CW and CCW optical modes in Sec. IV, and the phononic paritytime symmetry in Sec. V. Based on parameters realized with existing technology in recent experiments, these optomechanical devices should be readily achievable. We give a discussion about the potential advantages of the travelingwave optomechanical system in In Sec. VI, and then summarize in Sec. VII.
Ii The system
In this work, we consider an MOM system as shown in Fig.1 (a): an integrated nonmagnetic dielectric microresonator served as both optical and mechanical resonator. The microresonator possesses the rotational symmetry, leading to the degeneracy of the optical or mechanical modes that are propagating in the CW and the CCW directions. In general, the Hamiltonian description of the system can be written as
(1) 
in which ()
(2) 
is the system Hamiltonian, which describes the optical and mechanical modes. Due to the rotational symmetry, both optical and mechanical mode fields can be represented by the traveling field and , with representing the cylindrical coordinator, and are the azimuthal quantum numbers. Therefore, we use and as the annihilation operators of the th optical and th mechanical modes, and the and are the corresponding mode frequencies. As mentioned above, we have and due to the CW and CCW symmetry.
The mechanical motion of the dielectric microresonator can modify the optical mode frequency, through the geometry effect and the photoelastic effect Balram2014 (); Baker2014 (), which leads to the optomechanical interaction Hamiltonian as
(3) 
The coupling strength is determined by the overlap of the optical electric field and the mechanical displacements or strain Balram2014 (); Baker2014 (); Tomes2011 (). Since the integral , the optomechanical interaction in this travelingwave microresonator should satisfy the selection rule that . We can separate the interaction Hamiltonians into two categories:

Dispersive optomechanics as shown in Fig.1 (b).
(4) Here, is the singlephoton coupling rate, which corresponds to the optical cavity frequency shift per phonon excitation. This dispersive optomechanics indicates the mechanical motion shifts the optical mode frequency. Due to the selection rule, only the mechanical mode with , i.e. the breathtype modes Weis2010 (); Shen2016 () can give rise to such interaction.

Tripleresonant optomechanics as shown in Fig.1 (c).
(5) It describes a Brillouin scattering in this tripleresonant system Dong2015 (), where a photon in mode split into a photon in mode and a phonon in mode . Here, is the Brillouin scattering coupling strength, which is nonzero only when the energy and momentum conservation are satisfied.
The term describes the driving of the optical modes and also the optical signal input to the system. With the weak interaction coupling, we can use strong optical driving fields to enhance optomechanical coupling strength Dong2012 (); Dong2015 (), and the optomechanical system evolves by optical signal input.
Iii Degenerate photon pair generation
For dispersive optomechanics, we can choose the two degenerate CCW () and CW () optical modes that are coupled to the breath mechanical mode, thus the interaction Hamiltonian is
(6) 
The system is a general bosonic threemode system, as shown in the Fig.2(a). Such model can also be realized in a ring type resonator coupling to a local mechanical oscillator Aspelmeter2014 (). Since both and can coherently couple with the mechanical mode, it is possible to realize the interaction between and mediated by the mechanical mode. It has been demonstrated that the reddetuned laser pump on both CW and CCW direction can induce the effective coupling between the CW and CCW signal photons. If we pump one direction with blue detuned laser, there will generate a photonphonon pair (antiStokes process), and the red detuned laser on the other direction will convert the phonon to photon (Stokes process), thus generate entangled photons propagate in opposite directions.
To study the entangling interaction between CW and CCW signal photons, we assume two driving fields of the CW and CCW optical modes with frequency detuned from the cavity as , with , where is the drive laser frequency. Let the detuning , and apply the standard linearization treatment, the effective Hamiltonian can be written as
(7) 
Here, the coupling strength is enhanced by the driving field amplitude . , The rotating wave approximation has been applied above with the assumption , where and are the cavity and mechanical damping rates, respectively.
For studying the entanglement of the photon pair, a weak signal is sent into CW optical mode as
(8) 
where is the external coupling to the cavity. The dynamics of the density matrix of the system is governed by the Master equation Scully1997 (), which reads
(9) 
where is the Lindblad superoperator for any operator , and is the phonon thermal excitation. In our calculation, we choose the damping rate of optical mode , the damping rate of mechanical mode , and from the experimental parameters Shen2016 ().
To characterize the nonclassicality of the twomode field, we introduce the parameter Agarwal1988 ()
(10) 
as a measure. For coherent states, , while for nonclassical states we will have Agarwal1988 (); Agarwal2013 ().
In the Fig.2, we numerically investigate the nonclassical parameter of the system in equilibrium state for various and . We should notice that the bluedetuned drive produces the photonphonon pairs, and it would also induce instability of the system due to the amplification. Using the wellknown RouthHurwitz stability conditions DeJesus1987 (), we derive the necessary and sufficient stability condition for this model as . In experiment, we can adjust the drive amplitude to guarantee , therefore the system is always stable for arbitrary .
The nonclassicality parameters as a function of the detuning for various thermal phonon are plotted in Fig.2(b). As expected, the nonclassicality parameter shows negativity , which implies nonclassicality of the two oppositely propagating fields due to the two drivings. When the detuning , the nonclassicality parameter reaches the smallest value. For more thermal phonon excitation , more noise phonon is converted to signal mode, thus the nonclassicality reduces. This noise phonon conversion can also actually be suppressed with the increasing of the effective coupling , as shown in Fig.2(c) that the nonclassicality is improved for larger . This is because when the effective coupling increases, the cooling of the phonon mode can be enhanced, and the thermal noise is suppressed Aspelmeter2014 (). As shown in Fig.2(d), we plot the nonclassicality parameter as a function of at the detuning . The reduces with the coupling and approaches , which is the lower bound of the parameter .
The degenerate CW and CCW signal photons travel in opposite directions, thus the two mode can be separately coupled to different optical waveguides [as shown in Fig.1(a)], which enable the typeII (spatially separable) entanglement photon source on a photonic chip. Compared to the crystals used in free space parametric down conversion, the travelingwave optomechanical approach has the advantages that narrow linewidth, long coherence time, high purity and waveguide integrated. This scheme can be used to realize quantum repeaters Simon2007 () and nonclassical interference Fulconis2007 () by using indistinguishable photon pair generated by the integrated microresonator. The potential limitation of the thermal phonon can be relaxed by coupling the mechanical mode to a third optical cavity mode, which is used to cool the mechanical mode towards the ground state. When the damping rates satify , the steadystate entanglement can be achieved via reservoir engineering Wang2013 (); Schmidt2012 (). For large mechanical noise , quantum interference can be applied to achieve robust photon entanglement Tian2013 () in the strong coupling regime .
Iv Phasecontrolled nonreciprocity
As shown in Fig.1(a), the signal photon propagating in the forward and backward directions is coupling to the CCW and CW modes, therefore directional pump to the system can induce transmission difference between the forward and backward signal in the waveguide, which leads to the optical nonreciprocity. Different from the single mechanical mode induced nonreciprocity demonstrated in Ref. Shen2016 (); Ruesink2016 (), here we propose a new scheme for phasecontrolled nonreciprocal conversion by two mechanical mode. The underlying mechanism is that the two mechanical modes allow the paths for the coupling between the oppositely propagating signals, and effective coupling can be controlled by changing the relative phase of the two paths, which eventually leads to the oneway conversion between two modes.The schematic of the scheme is shown in Fig.3(a), where the CW and CCW modes are dispersively coupled to two breath mechanical modes (one can be the radial expansion mode, the other one can be the outofplain vibration mode). In the bosonic fourmode system, the CW (CCW) optical mode is driven by lasers at two frequencies and , with different amplitudes and phases. Under the condition that max, we can realize the coherent coupling between the phonons and photons, the effective interaction Hamiltonian can be written as
(11) 
where () is the annihilation operator of the mechanical mode , and is the effective complex optomechanical coupling with a certain phase from driving fields.
By including the damping effects, the dynamics of the system obeys the quantum Langevin equations
(12) 
where is a vector of the operators, the input vector , and the coefficient matrix
(13) 
Transforming the equations into the frequency domain, the intracavity field is solved as . Using the standard inputoutput theory , the output of the system is obtained as , where the scattering matrix . We notice that there are two paths of the coherent conversion between CW and CCW signal photons, therefore the total phase difference between the path and the path plays a key role in the optical mode conversion. When the symmetry between the two paths is broken, the system becomes nonreciprocal.
To illustrate the phasecontrolled nonreciprocity, we assume the effective coupling strengths are real except for . For the convenience of expression, we define the cooperativity . If only one mechanical mode is coupled to the optical modes, it has been demonstrated in the experiment that the transmission is nonreciprocal only if , while the signal reflection is always reciprocal Shen2016 (). In additional to the optomechanically induced phase shifting and absorption, the nonreciprocal conversion between two modes is also very important for information processing, and this can be realized in our scheme.
The Fig.3(bd) shows the conversion efficiencies between CW and CCW modes as a function of the signal frequency and the pump phase differences . The black solid line in the Fig.3(b) shows the reciprocal conversion when the phase . However, when we choose the phase , as shown in Fig.3(b), the nonreciprocal conversion is observed. When , we find (the red dotted line), which means that the conversion from the CW to the CCW is almost forbidden, while the opposite conversion is feasible. When , there is an opposite result, which is confirmed by the blue dashed line . To further illustrate the effect of the phase, we plot the conversion efficiency as the function of the phase for the frequency in the Fig.3(c), which obviously shows that the optical conversion can be periodically changed with the increasing of the phase . Fig.3(d) shows the ratio as the function of the phase , which can reach the nonreciprocal degree for the experimental parameters. It is obvious that the total phase difference plays a key role in the optical mode conversion.
If we can realize the parameters , the ideal nonreciprocal optical conversion is possible. This assumption seems to be counterintuitive because usually the damping rate of the mechanical mode is smaller than the decay rate of the cavity mode, but we can satisfy the condition when the mechanical mode is coupled to an auxiliary cavity mode Xu2016 (). In addition, the signal frequency of ideal optical conversion can be tuned by the detuning between the driving fields and the optical modes, which has been recently demonstrated in the microwave transmission Bernier2016 ().
V Phononic paritytime symmetry
Most of previous studies are focus on the control of multiple optical signal modes. The degenerate CW and CCW acoustic modes can also be used for interesting applications. Here, we consider a stimulated Brillouin scattering in this tripleresonant optomechanics Kim2015 (); Dong2015 (), in which the Hamiltonian can be described as
(14) 
where , are the optical modes and is the acoustic mode that satisfies the selection rule.
In a perfect rotational symmetric whisperinggallery microresonator, the CW and CCW acoustic modes are degenerate. To study the nonHermitian physics of the phononic mode, we consider a slightly deformed microresonator that breaks the rotational symmetry and induces an effective coupling between and . The schematic of the system is shown in the Fig.4(a), and the phonon coupling is described as
(15) 
where is the deformed boundary induced backscattering, i.e. the coupling between the mechanical CW and CCW modes. In practical experimental system, the can be easily controlled to be the order of without degrading the high quality factor of optical and mechanical modes. Since the optical wavelength is much shorter than that of acoustic modes, the smooth boundary deformation will not induce observable backscattering between the optical modes.
If we drive the optical mode for the CW direction and for the CCW direction by two control fields, the Hamiltonian can be simplified as
(16) 
where is the effective optomechanical coupling by the driving field .The Hamiltonian , in which and , where and are the frequencies driving on and , respectively.
To investigate the PTsymmetric mechnaical system Jing2014 (); Konotop2016 (), we use a probe field to drive the optical mode with the frequency . We can write the following rate equations for the coupledresonators system
(17) 
where is a vector of the operators, the input vector , and the coefficient matrix
(18) 
where , , , . For , we can adiabatically eliminate the optical modes by
(19)  
(20) 
and we can obtain the effective rate equations of the acoustic modes
(21)  
(22)  
Here we choose the driving frequency and . The coupling of these two resonators creates two supermodes and with the eigenfrequencies and given as
(23) 
where , , and .
Then the value of sastisfying is the threshold coupling strength , which is found as
(24) 
It is clear that depends on the drving strength of the system. For the ideal case when gain and loss are balanced (i.e., ), the coupling strength becomes
(25) 
The threshold coupling strength versus the for the fixed MHz is plotted in the Fig.4(b). The black dash line shows the coupling and the red dot is corresponding to the ideal PTsymmetry. For , the system is in a unbrokensymmetry phase in Fig.4(c) and 4(d), as seen in both the nonzero difference of the real parts of the eigenfrequencies and the coalescence in their imaginary parts. As approaches 1 from below, the difference in the real parts of the eigenfrequencies decreases and their imaginary parts bifurcate.
To observe the phenomena of the PTsymmetry, we can calculate the intracavity field by the Eq.(17). When the system is in the steady state , we obtain
(26)  
(27)  
(28)  
(29) 
where and , in which the detuning .
The spectra of the steadystate intracavity field are shown in Fig.5. When we choose the coupling MHz, we have the threshold coupling strength , which is in the unbrokenPTsymmetric region. Fig.5(a) shows the intracavity field as the function of detuning , and there are two resonance peaks, which are corresponding to nonzero difference of the real parts of the eigenfrequencies in the Fig.4(b). The imaginary parts of the eigenfrequencies in Fig. 4(c) show the coalescence, which is confirmed with the same width of the two peaks. The intracavity field is plotted in the Fig.5(b), which shows the similar phenomena. When with the coupling MHz, we observe the brokenPTsymmetric phenomena, and there is one peak in the Fig.5(c) and 5(d). By the deformation optomechanical system, we demonstrate that the paritytime symmetry of acoustic modes can be observed. More importantly, gain could be provided only by optical fields without nonlinear processes. Based on parameters realized with existing technology in recent experiments, these optomechanical devices should be readily achievable.
The parameters we choose above satisfy Im, which means that all modes have the loss. When Im, it is obvious that the system is unstable, and we can calculate the intracavity field with driving pulse numerically by the Eq.(17). In the linear regime, the transmission is reciprocal regardless of whether the symmetry is broken or unbroken.
Vi Discussion
The travelingwave optomechanical system can be realized in the solid state whispering gallery microresonators, with various shapes and materials Strekalov2016 (). Those highquality materials usually support not only high quality factor () optical modes, but also supports high mechanical modes. Especially, in polished single crystal resonators, the mechanical quality factor can be as high as Zhang2016 (). Therefore, this type microresonator has great potential for the coherent optomechanical interactions.
Compared with the optical modes, the mechanical modes have much longer lifetime and can be used as quantum memory. In compare with the usual single mode optomechanics, the travelingwave microresoantors have two unique advantages, the mode degeneracy and suppression of dephasing. By employing the degenerate CW and CCW acoustic modes, the binary bosonic memory is possible Dong2015 (). The degenerate traveling modes have the remarkable properties that the modes bear the same noise source, and the noises cancel in most of applications. For example, if a single phonon excitation is stored as a superposition of CW and CCW directions, their phase coherence can be insensitive to the external vibration and thermal noise. Because the dominated dephasing noise of both CW and CCW are the same, the relative phase between CW and CCW mode conserves. Therefore, the natural degenerate modes in travelingwave microresonators form a decoherencefree subspace and preserve the coherence.
In practical applications, the degeneracy of the CW and CCW modes would also save the laser source. We can use one pump laser to study the coherent interaction in two directions. Besides the CW and CCW modes studied in this work, the travelingwave optomechanical system supports optical modes and mechanical modes in a large frequency range, with the mode frequency approximately proportional to the angular momentum . By choosing a proper material, there will be hundreds of optical modes covering the visible, IR and midIR frequency range. Similarly, the acoustic wave modes also show a comb like spectrum, and have the frequency range from few MHz to GHz Savchenkov2011 (). So, the applications discussed in this paper on the CW and CCW modes can be generalized to the modes with very different frequencies.
Vii Conclusion
In summary, we theoretically study the multimode optomechanics based on the travelingwave microresonators, where the degenerate clockwise and counterclockwise optical and acoustical modes can be controlled selectively by optically pumping in different directions. By the unique properties of the travelingwave optomechanic systems, we have proposed several unique applications of the system. Based on the parameters realized in recent experiments, these optomechanical devices should be readily achievable, even on the level of singlephoton with practical noises.
Acknowledgments. We thank Yuan Chen for preparing figure 1b and 1c, and acknowledge ChuanShen Yang and Hui Jing for useful suggestions. This work was funded by the National Key R & D Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0301300, and 2016YFA0301700), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11474271 and Grant No. 11674305), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2016M602013). YDW acknowledges the support of NSFC grant No. 11574330 and No. 11434011.
References
 (1) M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
 (2) T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, Cavity Optomechanics: BackAction at the Mesoscale, Science 321, 1172 (2008).
 (3) M. Aspelmeyer, P. Meystre, and K. Schwab, Quantum optomechanics, Phys. Today 65, 29 (2012).
 (4) D. Van Thourhout and J. Roels, Optomechanical device actuation through the optical gradient force, Nat. Photon. 4, 211 (2010).
 (5) T. Hong, H. Yang, H. Miao, and Y. Chen, Open quantum dynamics of singlephoton optomechanical devices, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023812 (2013).
 (6) M. Li, W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, T. BaehrJones, M. Hochberg, and H. X. Tang, Harnessing optical forces in integrated photonic circuits, Nature 456, 480 (2008).
 (7) M. Eichenfield, R. Camacho, J. Chan, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, A picogram and nanometrescale photoniccrystal optomechanical cavity, Nature 459, 550 (2009).
 (8) L. Fan, C.L. Zou, M. Poot, R. Cheng, X. Guo, X. Han, and H. X. Tang, Integrated optomechanical singlephoton frequency shifter, Nat. Photonics 10, 766–770 (2016).
 (9) M. Bagheri, M. Poot, M. Li, W. P. H. Pernice, and H. X. Tang, Dynamic manipulation of nanomechanical resonators in the highamplitude regime and nonvolatile mechanical memory operation, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 726 (2011).
 (10) G. D. Cole, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity optomechanics: Mechanical memory sees the light, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 690 (2011).
 (11) G. Anetsberger, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, Q. P. Unterreithmeier, E. M. Weig, M. L. Gorodetsky, J. P. Kotthaus, and T. J. Kippenberg, Measuring nanomechanical motion with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. A 82, 061804 (2010).
 (12) P. Weber, J. Güttinger, A. Noury, J. VergaraCruz , and A. Bachtold, Force sensitivity of multilayer graphene optomechanical devices, Nat. Commun. 7, 12496 (2016).
 (13) C. F. OckeloenKorppi, E. Damskägg, J.M. Pirkkalainen, A. A. Clerk, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanpää, Quantum Backaction Evading Measurement of Collective Mechanical Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 140401 (2016).
 (14) J. Aasi et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nat. Photon. 7, 613 (2013).
 (15) A. Belenchia, D. M. T. Benincasa, S. Liberati, F. Marin, F. Marino, and A. Ortolan, Testing Quantum Gravity Induced Nonlocality via Optomechanical Quantum Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161303 (2016).
 (16) M. Ludwig, B. Kubala, and F. Marquardt, The optomechanical instability in the quantum regime, New J. Phys. 10, 095013 (2008).
 (17) F. Brennecke, S. Ritter, T. Donner, T. Esslinger, Cavity Optomechanics with a BoseEinstein Condensate, Science 322, 235 (2008).
 (18) F. Khalili, S. Danilishin, H. Miao, H. MüllerEbhardt, H. Yang, and Y. Chen, Preparing a Mechanical Oscillator in NonGaussian Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070403 (2010).
 (19) K. Stannigel, P. Komar, S. J. M. Habraken, S. D. Bennett, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Optomechanical Quantum Information Processing with Photons and Phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 013603 (2012).
 (20) T. P. Purdy, R. W. Peterson, and C. A. Regal, Observation of Radiation Pressure Shot Noise on a Macroscopic Object, Science 339, 801(2013).
 (21) J. D. Teufel et al., Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Nature 475, 359 (2011).
 (22) S. Weis, R. Riviére, S. Deléglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically Induced Transparency, Science 330, 1520 (2010).
 (23) A. H. SafaviNaeini, T. P. Mayer Alegre, J. Chan, M. Eichenfield, M. Winger, Q. Lin, J. T. Hill, D. E. Chang, and O. Painter, Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics, Nature 472, 69 (2011).
 (24) T. A. Palomaki, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehnert, Entangling Mechanical Motion with Microwave Fields, Science 342, 710 (2013).
 (25) E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kronwald, F. Marquart, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science 349, 952 (2015).
 (26) C. Dong, V. Fiore, M. C. Kuzyk, and H. Wang, Optomechanical Dark Mode, Science 338, 1609 (2012).
 (27) R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert, Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light, Nat. Phys. 10, 321 (2014).
 (28) X.W. Xu and Y. Li, Optical nonreciprocity and optomechanical circulator in threemode optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053854 (2015).
 (29) A. Meltelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015).
 (30) V. Peano, M. Houde, C. Brendel, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Topological phase transitions and chiral inelastic transport induced by the squeezing of light, Nat. Commun. 7, 10779 (2016).
 (31) B. Peng et al., Parity–timesymmetric whisperinggallery microcavities, Nat. Phys. 10, 394 (2014).
 (32) C. Wurl, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Symmetrybreaking oscillations in membrane optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 94 063860 (2016).
 (33) H. Xu, D. Mason, Luyao Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature 537, 80 (2016).
 (34) I. S. Grudinin, H. Lee, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, Phonon Laser Action in a Tunable TwoLevel System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 083901 (2010).
 (35) J. Fan and L. Zhu, Enhanced optomechanical interaction in coupled microresonators, Opt. Express 20, 20790 (2012).
 (36) L. F. Buchmann and D. M. StamperKurn, Nondegenerate multimode optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 92, 013851 (2015).
 (37) T. Kipf and G. S. Agarwal, Superradiance and collective gain in multimode optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 90, 053808 (2014).
 (38) S. Chesi, Y. D. Wang, and J. Twamley, Diabolical points in multiscatterer optomechanical systems, Sci. Rep. 5, 7816 (2015).
 (39) Z. J. Deng, X.B. Yan, Y.D. Wang, and C.W. Wu, Optimizing the outputphoton entanglement in multimode optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033842 (2016).
 (40) Y.S. Park and H. Wang, Resolvedsideband and cryogenic cooling of an optomechanical resonator, Nat. Phys. 5, 489 (2009).
 (41) K. C. Balram, M. Davanço, J. Y. Lim, J. D. Song, and K. Srinivasan, Moving boundary and photoelastic coupling in GaAs optomechanical resonators, Optica 1, 414 (2014).
 (42) C. Baker, W. Hease, D.T. Nguyen, A. Andronico, S. Ducci, G. Leo, and I. Favero, Photoelastic coupling in gallium arsenide optomechanical disk resonators, Opt. Express 22, 14072 (2014).
 (43) M. Tomes, F. Marquardt, G. Bahl, and T. Carmon, Quantummechanical theory of optomechanical Brillouin cooling, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063806 (2011).
 (44) I. S. Grudinin, A. B. Matsko, and L. Maleki, Brillouin Lasing with a CaF2 Whispering Gallery Mode Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 043902 (2009).
 (45) G. Bahl, J. Zehnpfennig, M. Tomes, and T. Carmon, Stimulated optomechanical excitation of surface acoustic waves in a microdevice. Nat. Commun. 2, 403 (2011).
 (46) G. Bahl, M. Tomes, F. Marquardt, and T. Carmon, Observation of spontaneous Brillouin cooling. Nat. Phys. 8, 203–207 (2012).
 (47) Z. Shen, Y.L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.L. Zou, Y.F. Xiao, X.B. Zou, F.W. Sun, G.C. Guo, and C.H. Dong, Experimental realization of optomechanically induced nonreciprocity, Nat. Photon. 10, 657 (2016).
 (48) F. Ruesink, M.A. Miri, A. Alù, and E. Verhagen, Nonreciprocity and magneticfree isolation based on optomechanical interactions, Nat. Commun. 7, 13662 (2016).
 (49) J. H. Kim, M C. Kuzyk, K. Han, H. Wang, and G. Bahl, Nonreciprocal Brillouin scattering induced transparency, Nat. Phys. 11, 275 (2015).
 (50) C.H. Dong, Z. Shen, C.L. Zou, Y.L. Zhang, W. Fu, and G.C. Guo, Brillouinscatteringinduced transparency and nonreciprocal light storage, Nat. Commun. 6, 6193 (2015).
 (51) M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).
 (52) G. S. Agarwal, Nonclassical statistics of fields in pair coherent states, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 1940 (1988).
 (53) Girish S. Agarwal, Quantum Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).
 (54) E. X. DeJesus and C. Kaufman, RouthHurwitz criterion in the examination of eigenvalues of a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Phys. Rev. A 35, 5288 (1987).
 (55) C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. Sangouard, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Quantum Repeaters with Photon Pair Sources and Multimode Memories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190503 (2007).
 (56) J. Fulconis, O. Alibart, J. L. O’Brien, W. J. Wadsworth, and J. G. Rarity, Nonclassical Interference and Entanglement Generation Using a Photonic Crystal Fiber Pair Photon Source, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120501 (2007).
 (57) YingDan Wang and Aashish A. Clerk, ReservoirEngineered Entanglement in Optomechanical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 253601 (2013).
 (58) M. Schmidt, M. Ludwig, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical circuits for nanomechanical continuous variable quantum state processing, New J. Phys. 14, 125005 (2012).
 (59) Lin Tian, Robust Photon Entanglement via Quantum Interference in Optomechanical Interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233602 (2013).
 (60) XunWei Xu, Yong Li, AiXi Chen, and Yuxi Liu, Nonreciprocal conversion between microwave and optical photons in electrooptomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023827 (2016).
 (61) N. R. Bernier, L. D. Tóth, A. Koottandavida, A. Nunnenkamp, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kippenberg, Nonreciprocal reconfigurable microwave optomechanical circuit, arXiv:1612.08223 (2016).
 (62) H. Jing, S. K. Özdemir, X.Y. Lü, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, PT Symmetric Phonon Lase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014).
 (63) V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves in PT symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035002 (2016).
 (64) D. V Strekalov, C. Marquardt, A. B. Matsko, H. G. L. Schwefel, and G. Leuchs, Nonlinear and quantum optics with whispering gallery resonators, J. Opt. 18, 123002 (2016).
 (65) X. Zhang, C.L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Cavity magnomechanics, Science Advances 2, e1501286 (2016).
 (66) A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, Surface acoustic wave optomechanical oscillator and frequency comb generator, Opt. Lett. 36, 3338–40 (2011).