Optical spectra of the heavy fermion uniaxial ferromagnet UGe{}_{2}

Optical spectra of the heavy fermion uniaxial ferromagnet UGe

V. Guritanu Département de Physique de la Matière Condensée, Université de Genève, quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, CH 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland    N. P. Armitage Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA    R. Tediosi Département de Physique de la Matière Condensée, Université de Genève, quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, CH 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland    S. S. Saxena Department of Physics, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK    A. Huxley Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, School of Physics, King’s Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK    D. van der Marel Département de Physique de la Matière Condensée, Université de Genève, quai Ernest-Ansermet 24, CH 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland
August 17, 2019
Abstract

We report a detailed study of UGe single crystals using infrared reflectivity and spectroscopic ellipsometry. The optical conductivity suggests the presence of a low frequency interband transition and a narrow free-carrier response with strong frequency dependence of the scattering rate and effective mass. We observe sharp changes in the low frequency mass and scattering rate below the upper ferromagnetic transition . The characteristic changes are exhibited most strongly at an energy scale of around 12 meV (100 cm). They recover their unrenormalized value above and for 40 meV. In contrast no sign of an anomaly is seen at the lower transition temperature of unknown nature 30 K, observed in transport and thermodynamic experiments. In the ferromagnetic state we find signatures of a strong coupling to the longitudinal magnetic excitations that have been proposed to mediate unconventional superconductivity in this compound.

The possibility of unconventional superconductivity mediated by ferromagnetic fluctuations has long been a subject of theoretical speculation Ginzburg (1957); Fay and Appel (1980). Interest in this subject has been recently piqued with the discovery of superconductivity coexisting with the ferromagnetic state of UGe under pressure Saxena et al. (2000). UGe is a strongly anisotropic uniaxial ferromagnet with filled electron states. Due to correlations and conduction band- hybridization, carrier masses are found to be strongly enhanced Ōnuki et al. (1991) (10 - 25 m) although specific heat coefficients still fall an order of magnitude short of the largest values found in antiferromagnetic uranium-based heavy fermion (HF) compounds. UGe exhibits a Curie temperature that strongly decreases with increasing pressure from about 53 K at ambient pressure to full suppression around 16 kbar. Superconductivity exists in a pressure region from 10 to 16 kbar, just below the complete suppression of ferromagnetism Saxena et al. (2000). Although superconductivity and ferromagnetism are usually found to be antagonistic phenomena, the observation fits within the now common scenario of finding superconductivity near the zero temperature termination of a magnetic phase. In this sense it seemed quite natural to associate the superconductivity with being mediated by the magnetic fluctuations that diverge at a quantum critical point (QCP) perhaps as in the case of pressure driven superconductivity in the antiferromagnetic HF superconductors. However, the para- to ferromagnetic transition is strongly first-order and is not associated with a peak in the effective electronic mass or superconducting transition temperature. It therefore appears that superconductivity is not directly related to the quantum phase transition connecting the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic states Huxley et al. (2001); Pfleiderer and Huxley (2002).

In addition to the main ferromagnetic transition, there appears to be an additional weak first-order transition of more enigmatic origin at lower temperatures (for = 0; = 30 K and for = 0; 12.5 kbar), which has been identified resistivity Huxley et al. (2001); Oomi et al. (1998); Tateiwa et al. (2001), magnetization Pfleiderer and Huxley (2002) and heat capacity Oomi et al. (1998); Tateiwa et al. (2001). The critical pressure is very close to that where the superconducting temperature is maximum, and it may be that the superconductivity is mediated fluctuations from this weak first-order transition. The exact nature of the state below is not clear at present. It has been suggested that these two magnetic phases are related by a first-order Stoner-like phase transition in the spin magnetization due to a sharp double-peak in the density of states near Sandeman et al. (2003). An alternative suggestion is that a competition between spin-orbit coupling and crystal field effects drives a change in the local moment configuration Shick et al. (2004). Other possibilities such as a coexisting charge-density wave or spin-density wave order exist, however neutron scattering has failed to detect any such phases thus far Huxley et al. (2001). We also note that at ambient pressure the signatures of the lower transition is only weakly visible in the resistivity Oomi et al. (1995) and magnetization measurements Pfleiderer and Huxley (2002); Motoyama et al. (2001). Moreover, there is also no or almost no anomaly in the specific heat at ambient pressure Huxley et al. (2001); Tateiwa et al. (2001). It may be that this transition at does not extend all the way to zero pressure and, in fact, the line of first order transitions terminates in a critical end point at finite temperature and pressure. at ambient pressure is then indicative of a a crossover and not a true phase transition.

In this paper we present the results of a detailed optical study of UGe single crystal using infrared reflectivity and spectroscopic ellipsometry. We have found a renormalized zero frequency mode with a large frequency dependent effective mass and scattering rate below the upper ferromagnetic transition . They recover their unrenormalized values above and for 40 meV. In contrast no sign of an anomaly is seen at 30 K. In the ferromagnetic state, we find signatures of a strong coupling to the longitudinal magnetic fluctuations which have been proposed to mediate unconventional superconductivity in this compound.

Measurements were performed in the frequency range from 50 cm (6.2 meV) to 30000 cm (3.7 eV) combining infrared (IR) reflectivity via Fourier transform spectroscopy, and ellipsometry from the near-infrared to ultraviolet energy range. The absolute value of the reflectivity was calibrated against a reference gold layer evaporated in situ on the sample surface. Ellipsometry and IR data were combined using a Kramers-Kronig consistent variational fitting procedure Kuzmenko (2005). This allows the extraction over a broad energy range of all the significant frequency and temperature dependent optical properties like for instance, the complex conductivity . The sample used for this study was grown at the CEA-Grenoble by the Czochralski technique Saxena et al. (2000). Measurements were taken in quasi-normal incidence to the a-c plane using linearly polarized light. We found only a small shift of the spectra between the two crystal directions with any differences smaller than our experimental accuracy (). The displayed spectrum is the average of the two directions.

Figure 1: (Color online) The normal-incidence reflectivity of UGe at three temperatures. The inset shows at 70, 100 and 150 cm. The reflectivity curves at 100 K and 290 K overlap on this scale.

Figure 1 shows the reflectivity spectra over the full energy range. At high temperature exhibits a monotonic increase as expected for a metal with as . As the sample is cooled below the reflectivity shows a significant increase with the largest effects at low frequency (see Fig. 1 inset). No sign of an anomaly is found at the temperature , which may be not surprising considering its weak signature in transport and thermodynamics at ambient pressure. It is interesting to mention that URuSi also has a second magnetic transition of unknown nature at low temperatures, which appears very pronounced in the infrared spectrum Bonn et al. (1988). The fact that in UGe we see no signature of the second magnetic transition in the optical spectra, suggests a very different nature of this transition in the two materials.

Figure 2: (Color) a) at different temperatures in the energy range of 6.2 meV to 3.7 eV. b) The enlargement of the low energy data including the zero frequency extrapolations.

We observe that the reflectivity has no significant temperature dependence above 1000 cm (0.12 eV), which suggests a negligible temperature dependence at even higher frequencies. We used therefore room temperature ellipsometry for frequencies greater than 6000 cm (0.74 eV) to calculate the complex optical conductivity over the entire spectral range displayed in Fig. 2 a). We assign the peak at approximately 1 eV to an interband transition. At high temperature the low frequency optical conductivity shows a broad Drude-like behaviour as expected for a metal. The low frequency conductivity is strongly temperature and frequency dependent. To clarify this trend we show an enlargement of the low frequency data in Fig. 2 b). Below 50 cm we plot the zero frequency extrapolations obtained using the DC conductivity in the fitting procedure. Several remarkable low frequency structures form at low temperatures out of the broad Drude peak, including a very narrow zero frequency mode which represents the intraband response of the heavy quasiparticles. Concomitantly, a maximum develops at 110 cm (13.6 meV) and a weak structure at 300 cm (37 meV). As will be shown below, these features reflect various aspects of the coherent HF and ferromagnetic states.

In order to further analyze the shape of the low frequency spectra we use the extended Drude model. In this formalism the optical constants are expressed in terms of a frequency dependent effective mass and scattering rate 1/ by the following expression

(1)

where eV is the total Drude plasma frequency and is the complex optical conductivity. , which is determined through at 290 K and = 500 cm, acts as a normalization constant and does not affect the trends as a function of and .

Figure 3: (Color) The effective mass and the scattering rate as a function of photon energy derived from the extended Drude model with eV. The dashed lines below 50 cm show the extrapolation toward zero frequency obtained using the DC transport in the fitting process.

Figure 3 displays the spectra of and as a function of frequency obtained from the extended Drude model for different temperatures. At room temperature both the scattering rate and the effective mass are nearly frequency independent. As the sample is cooled and the magnetic order develops the effective mass is strongly enhanced and the scattering rate suppressed. Such behaviour suggests the development of heavy quasiparticles at low temperature. We observe that the strong increase of the effective mass and the rapid decrease of the scattering rate are largest below approximately 100 cm (12 meV) which can be regarded as the characteristic energy of the heavy quasiparticles. Below 50 cm we use the extrapolation toward zero frequency which gives a quasiparticle effective mass of over 25 for at the lowest . Qualitatively this value is consistent with the cyclotron masses of 10 - 25 m obtained by dHvA measurements Ōnuki et al. (1991).

In Figure 4 we present the temperature dependence of the effective mass and scattering rate at 0 and 65 cm obtained from Fig. 3. Note that at high temperature, in the paramagnetic state, both quantities are temperature independent. However, starting exactly at the scattering rate becomes strongly suppressed and the effective mass enhanced. Such behavior contrasts with the usual situation in HF compounds, where mass renormalizations develop below a coherence temperature different than the transition temperature to a magnetic state. Moreover, the conventional view is that the coherent HF state should actually be at a magnetic transition as the dominance of the RKKY interaction is expected to quench the Kondo effect Doniach (1977). The observed behavior is not completely unprecedented however, as a number of other multi- electron compounds have been found to undergo additional mass enhancements at the magnetic transition Dressel et al. (2002). In the present case however the magnetic transition appears to actually trigger the HF state suggesting an intrinsic . This behavior may be related to multiple occupation of the 5 levels, although we note that a similar effect in 3 electron systems has also been observed at the of ferromagnetic YbMnSb Burch et al. (2005) and helimagnetic FeGe Guritanu et al. (2007).

Figure 4: (Color online) Temperature dependence of the effective mass and the scattering rate for two frequencies.

In the optical spectra shown in Fig. 3 we observe a rather strong, but incomplete, suppression of for frequencies smaller than about 50 cm. The suppression of the scattering rate, which onsets at is reminiscent of that which occurs at energies below the Stoner gap in fully spin-polarized ferromagnets like CrO Singley et al. (1999). In such cases longitudinal Stoner-like spin-flip scattering is forbidden at energies below a threshold set by the energy difference from the bottom of the minority band to the Fermi level (the Stoner gap). UGe is not fully spin polarized but has only a small minority spin population at Shick and Pickett (201); Yamagami (2003). Moreover, the behavior of properties such as the pressure dependent magnetization and mechanisms of the pairing mechanism Sandeman et al. (2003) have been interpreted as a consequence of narrow peaks in the density of states, which could give an effective gap to spin flip excitations. Such a density of states is supported by band calculations Shick et al. (2004). Longitudinal fluctuations as such, which can possibly mediate exotic superconductivity, have been found by neutron scattering Huxley et al. (2003). We note that conventional magnons are not expected to play a large role in a strongly unaxial compound like UGe as their energy scales will be much higher. An effective gap to longitudinal spin-flip excitations has also been inferred through a Stoner model fit to the strength of magnetic Bragg peaks at low temperature with a gap that is on the order of the threshold in the optical scattering rate Aso et al. (2006). It is interesting that our spectra give a strong indication of a coupling of charge to these longitudinal fluctuations that were originally proposed as a possibility to mediate superconductivity in ferromagnetic compounds.

The observed suppression in the scattering rate is additional to that expected generically for HF compounds below their coherence temperatures. The usual expectation is that the effective mass and the quasiparticle lifetime are renormalized by approximately the same factor Millis and Lee (1987). In contrast, comparing the low temperature scattering rates and masses with their high temperature unrenormalized values we find the ratios and , which disagree by a factor of 8. A similar analysis using instead the high frequency values gives a similar discrepancy. The additional scattering suppression which onsets at implies a strong coupling between HF effects and magnetic ones with important implications for superconductivity. It is also interesting to note that as the temperature increases the energy scale of the threshold in does not appear to close at the transition, but instead the gap ‘fills in’ and a remnant of this suppression persists even up to 290 K. Similar effects have been observed in ferromagnetic nickel Eastman et al. (1978). This observation of gaps which ‘fill in’ instead of closing is a common occurrence in strongly correlated systems Furukawa (1999).

Figure 5: (Color online) a), b) Schematic band structure within the PAM of the conduction and the 5 electrons at high and low temperature, respectively. Vertical arrow indicate the interband transitions. c), d) Sketch of the optical conductivity at high and low temperature.

The relatively large mass enhancement observed in UGe suggests the evolution of renormalized itinerant charge carriers out of a Fermi gas coupled to a lattice of 5 local orbitals. It is generally accepted that the periodic Anderson model (PAM), which describes the hybridization of a localized level with a conduction band, captures the essential physics of such systems Rice and K.Ueda (1986); Fulde et al. (1988); Millis and Lee (1987). In Fig. 5 we plot a schematic band dispersion of the PAM together with its optical conductivity at low and high temperature. At high only a dispersive conducting band crosses the Fermi level (E), whereas near E the 5 states are dispersionless. The intraband transitions give rise to a broad Drude conductivity sketched in Fig. 5 c). As the temperature is lowered, hybridization with the 5 level splits the conduction band into two branches and is responsible for the large effective mass observed at low temperature. Excitations between the split bands create the possibility for new interband transitions (Fig. 5 b) and redistributes spectral weight between high and low energies as shown in Fig. 5 d).

Although this general picture should hold in UGe, additional features in principle are expected as a result of uranium’s nominal 5 configuration which results in several 5 bands being involved in the heavy electron state. Moreover, as has been suggested for CeCoIrIn, a distribution of hybridization gaps due to a momentum dependence of the coupling parameter Burch et al. (2007); Shim et al. (2007); Weber and Vojta (2008) may result in multiple features in , such as seen in Fig. 2 b) at 300 cm (37 meV) and 110 cm (13.6 meV).

Our observations suggest an interesting interplay between spin-polarization and the HF coherent state. We believe that this is at the origin of the rather rich behaviour of the optical conductivity, resulting in two structures appearing below (13.6 meV and 37 meV), large quasi-particle renormalizations, and evidence for a strong coupling to the longitudinal magnetic modes which have been suggested to mediate superconductivity in this compound.

This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through Grant No. 200020-113293 and the National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) “Materials with Novel Electronic Properties-MaNEP” and the European Science Foundation (ECOM-COST action P16). The authors would like to thank N. Drichko, A. Kuzmenko, F. Lévy and F. Ronning for helpful conversations and E. Koller for technical support.

References

  • Ginzburg (1957) V. L. Ginzburg, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 153 (1957).
  • Fay and Appel (1980) D. Fay and J. Appel, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3173 (1980).
  • Saxena et al. (2000) S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, D. Braithwaite, et al., Nature 604, 587 (2000).
  • Ōnuki et al. (1991) Y. Ōnuki, S. W. Yun, I. Ukon, I. Umehara, K. Satoh, I. Sakamoto, M. Hunt, P. Meeson, P. A. Probst, and M. Springford, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 2127 (1991).
  • Huxley et al. (2001) A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, E. Ressouche, N. Kernavanois, D. Braithwaite, R. Calemczuk, and J. Flouquet, Phys. Rev. B 63, 144519 (2001).
  • Pfleiderer and Huxley (2002) C. Pfleiderer and A. D. Huxley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147005 (2002).
  • Oomi et al. (1998) C. G. Oomi, T. Kagayama, and Y. Ōnuki, J. Alloys Compd. 271-273, 482 485 (1998).
  • Tateiwa et al. (2001) N. Tateiwa, K. Hanazono, T. C. Kobayashi, K. Amaya, T. Inoue, K. Kindo, Y. Koike, N. Metoki, N. Y. Haga, R. Settai, et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 2876 (2001).
  • Sandeman et al. (2003) K. G. Sandeman, G. G. Lonzarich, and A. J. Schofield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167005 (2003).
  • Shick et al. (2004) A. B. Shick, V. Janis̆, V. Drchal, and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 70, 134506 (2004).
  • Oomi et al. (1995) G. Oomi, T. Kagayama, K. Nishimura, S. W. Yun, and Y. Ōnuki, Physica B 206-207, 515 (1995).
  • Motoyama et al. (2001) G. Motoyama, S. Nakamura, H. Kadoya, T. Nishioka, and N. K. Sato, Phys. Rev. B 65, 020510R (2001).
  • Kuzmenko (2005) A. B. Kuzmenko, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 083108 (2005).
  • Bonn et al. (1988) D. A. Bonn, J. D. Garrett, and T. Timusk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1305 (1988).
  • Doniach (1977) S. Doniach, Physica B 91, 231 (1977).
  • Dressel et al. (2002) M. Dressel, N. Kasper, K. Petukhov, B. Gorshunov, G. Grüner, M. Huth, and H. Adrian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186404 (2002).
  • Burch et al. (2005) K. S. Burch, A. Schafgans, N. P. Butch, T. A. Sayles, M. B. Maple, B. C. Sales, D. Mandrus, and D. N. Basov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 046401 (2005).
  • Guritanu et al. (2007) V. Guritanu, D. van der Marel, J. Teyssier, T. Jarlborg, H. Wilhelm, M. Schmidt, and F. Steglichi, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155114 (2007).
  • Singley et al. (1999) E. J. Singley, C. P. Weber, D. N. Basov, A. Barry, and J. M. D. Coey, Phys. Rev. B 60, 4126 (1999).
  • Shick and Pickett (201) A. B. Shick and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 300 (201).
  • Yamagami (2003) H. Yamagami, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, S2271 (2003).
  • Huxley et al. (2003) A. D. Huxley, S. Raymond, and E. Ressouche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207201 (2003).
  • Aso et al. (2006) N. Aso, G. Motoyama, Y. Uwatoko, S. Ban, S. Nakamura, T. Nishioka, Y. Homma, Y. Shiokawa, K. Hirota, and N. K. Sato, Phys. Rev. B 73, 054512 (2006).
  • Millis and Lee (1987) A. J. Millis and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 35, 3394 (1987).
  • Eastman et al. (1978) D. E. Eastman, F. J. Himpsel, and J. A. Knapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1514 (1978).
  • Furukawa (1999) N. Furukawa, Physics of Manganites, ed. T. Kaplan and S. Mahanti (Plenum Publishing, New York) (1999).
  • Rice and K.Ueda (1986) T. M. Rice and K.Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6420 (1986).
  • Fulde et al. (1988) P. Fulde, J. Keller, and G. Zwicknagl, Solid State Physics 41, 1 (1988).
  • Burch et al. (2007) K. S. Burch, S. V. Dordevic, F. P. Mena, A. B. Kuzmenko, D. van der Marel, J. L. Sarrao, J. R. Jeffries, E. D. Bauer, M. B. Maple, and D. N. Basov, Phys. Rev. B 75, 054523 (2007).
  • Shim et al. (2007) J. H. Shim, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Science 318, 1615 (2007).
  • Weber and Vojta (2008) H. Weber and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. B 77, 125118 (2008).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
321442
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description