Optical saturation driven by exciton confinement in molecular-chains: a TDDFT study

Optical saturation driven by exciton confinement in molecular-chains: a TDDFT study

Abstract

We have identified excitonic confinement in one-dimensional molecular chains (i.e. polyacetylene and H) as the main driving force for the saturation of the chain polarizability as a function of the number of molecular units. This conclusion is based on first principles time–dependent density functional theory calculations performed with a new derived exchange–correlation kernel. The failure of simple local and semi–local functionals is shown to be related to the lack of memory effects, spatial ultranonlocality, and self–interaction corrections. These effects get smaller as the gap of the system reduces, in which case such simple approximations do perform better.

pacs:
71.35.-y, 31.15.ee, 31.15.ap

The electronic quantum confinement occurring in low–dimensional systems is often responsible for the peculiar spectroscopic properties exhibited by molecules and nanostructures. Exciton confinement explains, for example, the size–dependent color of semiconducting quantum dots used as fluorescent markers in biology Alivisatos (). Highly localized excitons (solitons) play also a fundamental role in describing the process of vibrational energy transfer in complex proteins solitons (). In this context, one–dimensional polymers and molecular chains constitute an excellent playground to analyze the interplay between correlation effects and quantum confinement. For example, in non conducting polymers the longitudinal linear polarizability per monomer unit tends to a constant in the large–N limit resta (). This optical saturation stems from the polarization of the electrons along the chain that tends to counteract the external field and manifest itself in the dependence of the optical absorption spectra on the polymer size. The present Letter aims to provide a consistent description of this saturation within density–functional based schemes.

The commonly used local (LDA) and semilocal (GGA) approximations to Density–Functional–Theory (DFT) and Time–Dependent DFT (TDDFT) that successfully describe the electronic properties of many different physical systems tddft (), fail dramatically for the case of semiconducting one–dimensional molecular chains. ALDA do not describe the main features of the absorption spectra and strongly overestimates the polarizability with respect to quantum chemical calculations toto (); dalskov (); champagne (). The reason for this poor performance of ALDA is still not settled, and it has been traced back to the need of long-range (LR) terms (ultra non–locality) in the exchange-correlation functionals gonze () or to the lack of self–interaction correction (SIC) mori (); burke (). Exact-exchange (EXX) or current-density functional (CDFT) approaches capture some of the effects, but not all: while EXX works fairly well in the case of the finite H chain (reproducing the Hartree–Fock results mori ()) it fails in reproducing the absorption spectrum of the infinite trans–polyacetylene chain rohra (). On the contrary CDFT provides quite good results for finite -conjugated polymers vanfaassen (); vanfaassen2 (), while it breaks down for the H chain.

In TDDFT all the effects beyond the non interacting particles approximation are embodied in the exchange–correlation (xc) kernel , with the xc–potential and the exact ground state electronic density. The recent developments in merging many–body perturbation–theory (MBPT) rmp () and TDDFT sottile (); andrea () open the path to unravel the physical origin of the response properties of one-dimensional systems. Here we show that exciton confinement dictates the evolution (saturation) of the optical response of one–dimensional chains as a function of the chain length. Therefore the failure of EXX, available local or semilocal or CDFT approximations is related to their inability to describe strong excitonic effects in anisotropic low-dimensional systems. We show that the xc–kernel has a hyper-non local behavior and memory dependence that is at least one order of magnitude stronger than in solids. The static and dynamical polarizabilities are both well described in simple H or in more sophisticated trans–polyacetylene molecular chains.

The polarizability of low-dimensional systems is proportional to the spatial average of the reducible polarization function, that can be obtained from the solution of the TDDFT equation

(1)

The exchange–correlation part of the kernel as derived in Refs. andrea (); sottile () mimics to a good extent the MBPT results for the polarization function based on the solution of the Bethe-Salpeter (BS) equation for the electron–hole dynamics in the basis of the GW self–energy quasiparticle states rmp (). This kernel is first order in the screened coulomb potential : , where is the non-interacting quasi–particle response function. includes the correct behavior in the long–range regime andrea (); sottile (); botti (). The two constants, and , measure respectively the degree of spatial non locality and memory effects. In spite of its simplicity and in contrast to EXX and CDFT, this fully captures the excitonic features in the absorption spectra of bulk semiconductors, insulators as well as surfacestddft ().

Figure 1: (Color on-line) Axial optical polarizability spectra of the molecular H chain A, (Peierls distorted, left frame) and chain B (nearly equally spaced H-atoms, right frame). While the present kernel yields an excellent agreement with the Many–Body calculations in both cases, ALDA works only in the small gap case when the exciton is not localized. The excitonic wavefunctions excwf () corresponding to the main absorption peak are shown fixing the the hole in the middle of the central hydrogen molecular bond. The delocalisation of the exciton wavefunction for the very small gap (chain B) is connected with a successful description of the spectra by the ALDA (see text).

In order to illustrate how the kernel solves the failure of ALDA (and of any semi-local approximations) we consider two Peierls distorted infinite molecular chains method (). In chain A (see Fig. 1) the inter–molecular distance is set to 2.5 a.u. and the intra-molecular distance is 2.0 a.u. (as in previous worksvanfaassen (); champagne (); mori ()). This chain is a semiconductor with an LDA gap of 2.28 eV. In chain B the inter-molecular distance is reduced to 2.05 a.u. and the LDA gap gets very small (0.26 eV). In Fig. 1 we compare the calculated TDDFT absorption spectra for chains A and B in the ALDA and MBPT–. As the electronic density is more homogeneous in chain B than in chain A the ALDA gives an almost indistinguishable dynamical polarizability if compared to the BS calculations (see Fig 1 right panel). For the chain A, however, the ALDA performance worsens considerably, and the main absorption peak is not at all reproduced. The kernel, instead, yields a dynamical polarizability in both chains almost indistinguishable from the BS calculations. Similarly to the case of wide gap insulators andrea () the correct description of excitonic states require the kernel to have non local Fourier components. This means that is a matrix, whose size (a few hundred reciprocal space vectors in the present case) is intimately related to the localisation of the excitonic state andrea ().

The failure of the ALDA can be understood by looking at the spatial dispersion of the excitonic state corresponding to the main absorption peaks shown at the bottom of Fig. 1 for both chains. In chain A, where ALDA does not work, the exciton is confined within few -monomers ( 36 a.u.). Consequently, the excitonic dispersion introduces a characteristic length given by the exciton linear extension. In chain B the exciton is basically spread all over the chain. If we now look at the xc–kernel for the two chains we see very drastic differences: whereas in chain B both and are almost zero, in chain A and eVvolume_dep_note (), which is more than one order of magnitude larger than in solids, where , while eV botti (). This large value of reflects the dynamical renormalization of the excitonic energy, due to memory effects. More importantly the static limit of the long–range part of the total TDDFT kernel, is negative. This means that the spatial non locality of is stronger than the Hartree term solid_vs_chain (). This hyper non locality and the memory effects in cannot be captured by any static, local or semi-local approximation.

Turning now to finite-size effects, we show in Fig. 2 the results for the static polarizability of finite length H chains within different approximations for the xc–kernel. Both ALDA and CDFT yields a very slow saturation of as a function of the chain length and a strong overestimation of the static polarizability compared to accurate quantum chemical coupled cluster results CCSD(T). The TDDFT results obtained using the kernel partially reduce the ALDA and CDFT overestimation, showing a faster saturation. However the agreement with CCSD(T) is not yet satisfactory. We have traced the residual discrepancy to the lack of SIC in the LDA wavefunctions used to construct the xc–kernel. This can be easily corrected by recomputing the kernel, using Hartree–Fock (HF) self–interaction–free wavefunctions to build .

Figure 2: (color on-line) Axial polarizability per monomer of the molecular H chains. TDDFT calculations within the ALDA, , and (see text) are compared with coupled cluster CCSD(T) results champagne (). and CDFT using the VK kernel vanfaassen (). The real–space excitonic wavefunctions of selected chains, with the hole placed in the middle of the central hydrogen molecule bond, are also showed.

This new kernel yields axial polarizabilities in excellent agreement with the CCSD(T) results. The SIC increases the xc–kernel spatial non locality factor , which translates into further confinement of the excitonic states, compared to the LDA-based results. This can be rationalized by looking at the excitonic wave–functions shown in the bottom of Fig.2. The probability of finding an electron at the end of the chain when the hole is placed in the middle of the bond of the central molecule (that measures excitonic confinement) quickly decreases while increasing the chain length, being almost zero for for . The polarizability follows the same trend, saturating when the excitonic wavefunction dispersion does not change anymore. We should mention that, for small chains, ALDA gives good results as the excitonic wavefunction is spread over the whole molecule, and the electronic homogeneity is not strongly perturbed (like in the chain B case discussed above). It is clear that exciton confinement plays a major role in the determination of the response properties of molecular chains providing microscopic support to the relevance of the ultranonlocality concept in exchange-correlation functionals.

Figure 3: (color on-line) Calculated absorption spectra for the infinite (left frame) and polarizability per monomer for the finite (right frame) trans–polyacetylene chain. ALDA is compared with the . The quasi-particle gap and the position of the experimental absorption at 1.7 eV leising () are also showed. The axial polarizability for the finite chains calculated within HF kirtman () and MP2 toto () are also reported. In the bottom we show the excitonic wave function corresponding to the bright  eV peak of the infinite chain.

The H chain represents an extreme case of system with few electrons, where confinement is crucial, while electronic screening is negligible (this is the reason why time–dependent HF works fine). For these reason TDDFT kernels that work in the case of H chain may fail in more complex molecular systems where electronic screening becomes more important. This is the case of the trans–polyacetylene (PA) molecular chain. The PA chain has been extensively studied in the past within the BS scheme rohlfing (). It has been showed that the main absorption peak observed experimentally is excitonic, with binding energy. On the contrary all available calculations within TDDFT do not reproduce the experimental results: ALDA spectra (see Fig. 3) is too low in energy and the main absorption peak shape is more similar to a Van Hove singularity than to an isolated excitonic peak. Within an EXX calculation it is possible to obtain a good agreement with the experiment only by neglecting the x–kernel, i.e. in the independent particle approximation rohra (), which is clearly inconsistent. For finite length chains, as in polyethylene, EXX results are, again, very similar to HF mori () that, in the case of PA largely overestimates the quantum chemistry MP2 results (inset of Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 3, the present kernel, instead, is in very good agreement with the MP2 results in the finite length case and with the experimental absorption peak position in the infinite length case comment (). MP2 calculations toto () predicts the PA chain polarizability to saturate around 15 monomers, in excellent agreement with the excitonic extension obtained with the present kernel (shown in the bottom of Fig. 2 for the bright PA exciton at 1.69 eV). As a result even in the more complex PA chain the polarizability saturation naturally correlates with the excitonic localisation length fully confirming the physical picture that emerged from the previous results for the H chains.

In conclusion we have shown that TDDFT successfully explain the optical saturation in molecular chains in terms of excitonic confinement. The Many-Body based xc–kernel, with the correct long–range tail and including, in the H chains, self–interaction corrections yields static and dynamical polarizabilities in excellent agreement with accurate quantum chemical calculations. We have proved that there exists a close link between the excitonic spatial extension and the axial polarizability in the TDDFT framework, giving a sound interpretation of the severe breakdown of the local–density approximation in anisotropic structures.

The authors thank Myrta Grüning for her contributions at the early stage of this work as well as Rosa Di Felice for fruitful discussions. We acknowledge support by the European Community Network of Excellence Nanoquanta (NMP4-CT-2004-500198), SANES (NMP4-CT-2006-017310), DNA-NANODEVICES (IST-2006-029192), and Spanish MEC (FIS2007-65702-C02-01) projects, Basque Country University (SGIker ARINA), and Barcelona supercomputing Center Mare Nostrum.

References

  1. M. Bruchez, Jr., M. Moronne, P. Gin, S. Weiss, and A. P. Alivisatos Science 281, 2013 (1998).
  2. A. Scott, Phys. Rep. 217, 1 (1992).
  3. K. N. Kudin, R. Car and R. Resta, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 134907 (2005). J. A. Berger, P. L. de Boeij and R. van Leeuwen J. Chem. Phys. 123, 174910 (2005).
  4. M. A. L. Marques, F. Nogueira, C. Ullrich, K. Burke, A. Rubio and E. K. U. Gross (Eds.), Time Dependent Density Functional Theory, Lecture notes Phys.706 Springer Verlag, Berlin (2006).
  5. T. T. Toto, J. L. Toto, C. P. de Melo, M. Hasan and B. Kirtman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 244, 59 (1995).
  6. E. K. Dalskov, J. Oddershede, and D. M Bishop, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2152 (1998).
  7. B. Champagne, D. H.Mosley, M. Vraĉko, and J. M. André Phys. Rev. A 52, 1039 (1995).
  8. X. Gonze, P. Ghosez, and R. W Godby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4035 (1995); 78, 294 (1997). S. J. A. van Gisbergen, P. R. T. Schipper, O. V. Gritsenko, E. J. Baerends, J. G. Snijders, B. Champagne, and B. Kirtman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 694, (1999). O. V. Gritsenko and E. J. Baerends Phys. Rev. A 64, 42506, (2001).
  9. P. Mori-Sánchez, Q. Wu and W. Yang J. Chem. Phys. 119, 11001 (2003).
  10. D. Pemmaraju, S. Sanvito, K. Burke cond-mat arXiv:0708.2814
  11. S. Rohra, E. Engel, and A. Görling, Phys. Rev. B, 74, 045119 (2006).
  12. M. van Faassen, P. L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen ,J.A. Berger and J.G. Snijders Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 186401 (2002).
  13. M. van Faassen, P. L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen, J.A. Berger and J.G. Snijders J. Chem. Phys. 118 1044 (2003).
  14. G.Onida, L. Reining and A.Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002) and reference therein.
  15. L. Reining, V. Olevano, A. Rubio, G. Onida Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 66404 (2002); F. Sottile, V. Olevano and L. Reining Phys. Rev. Lett 91, 56402 (2003); F. Bruneval, F. Sottile, V. Olevano, R. Del Sole and L. Reining Phys. Rev. Lett 94, 186402 (2005)
  16. A. Marini, R. Del Sole, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Lett 91, 256402 (2003); G. Adragna, R. Del Sole and A. Marini, Phys. Rev. B 68, 165108 (2003).
  17. S. Botti, A. Fourreau, N. Nguyen, Y. Renault, F. Sottile, and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. B 72, 125203 (2005).
  18. The excitonic wave–functions have been obtained from the the linearized Bethe–Salpeter equation by a diagonalization preocedure.
  19. The ground state LDA calculations have been performed using the Abinit code abinit () and the HF ones with the PWscf (http://www.pwscf.org/) code. All calculations use Troullier–Martins pseudopotentials [N. Troullier and J.L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991)]. Excited state calculations (BS, GW and TDDFT) have been performed using the SELF self () code. Following Ref. cutoff () we have used a truncated Coulomb potential to avoid the spurious interactions between repeated cells.
  20. X. Gonze, J. M. Beuken, R. Caracas, F. Detraux, M. Fuchs, G. M. Rignanese, L. Sindic, M. Verstraete, G. Zerah, F. Jollet, M. Torrent, A. Roy, M. Mikami, Ph. Ghosez, J. Y. Raty and D. C. Allan, Comp. Mat. Sci. 25, 478 (2002).
  21. A. Marini, the SELF project, http://people.roma2.infn.it/~marini/self.
  22. C. A. Rozzi, D. Varsano, A. Marini, E. K. U. Gross, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. B 73, 205119 (2006)
  23. In low–dimensional systems the two constants and scale linearly as a function of the simulation volume. Nevertheless the product entering the TDDFT equation is always finite.
  24. In solids, the optical absorption differs from the polarizability . is proportional to the spatial average of the modified reducible polarization , solution of Eq.1 with no long–range component in the Hartree term of the kernel rmp (), i.e., and even small values of yields large modifications of the non–interacting absorption spectrum. In the infinite H chain must counteract the non zero Hartree term to yield similar effects on the polarizability spectrum.
  25. M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1959 (1999); M. L. Tiago, M. Rohlfing, and S. G. Louie Phys. Rev. B 70, 193204 (2004). P. Pusching and C. Ambrosch Draxl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 056405 (2002).
  26. In contrast to the molecular chains, the LDA wavefunctions do capture very well the delocalised nature of the orbitals in the PA chain. Therefore, additional SIC corrections are less important and LDA wavefunctions are a good starting point for the MBPT–kernel (as in previous MBPT calculationsrohlfing ()).
  27. G. Leising, Phys. Rev. B 38, 10313 (1988).
  28. B. Kirtman, J. L. Toto, K. A. Robins, and M. Hasan J. Chem. Phys. 102, 5350 (1995).
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
220568
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description