On Cooling of Neutron Stars With Stiff Equation of State Including Hyperons

On Cooling of Neutron Stars With Stiff Equation of State Including Hyperons

Hovik Grigorian Laboratory for Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia Yerevan State University, Alek Manyukyan 1, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia    Evgeni E. Kolomeitsev Matej Bel University, Tajovskeho 40, SK-97401 Banska Bystrica, Slovakia    Konstantin A. Maslov Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), Kashirskoe shosse 31, RU-115409 Moscow, Russia    Dmitry N. Voskresensky Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Russia National Research Nuclear University (MEPhI), Kashirskoe shosse 31, RU-115409 Moscow, Russia
Abstract

The existence of high mass () pulsars PSR J1614-2230 and PSR J0348-0432 requires the compact star matter to be described by a stiff equation of state (EoS). Presence of hyperons in neutron stars leads to a softening of the EoS that results in a decrease of the maximum neutron-star mass below the measured values of masses for PSR J1614-2230 and PSR J0348-0432 pulsars, if one exploits ordinary relativistic mean-field (RMF) models (hyperon puzzle). However, within a RMF EoS with a scaled hadron effective masses and coupling constants the maximum neutron-star mass remains above even when hyperons are included. Also other important constraints on the equation of state, e.g. the flow constraint from heavy-ion collisions are to be fulfilled. We demonstrate how a satisfactory explanation of all existing observational data for the temperature-age relation is reached within the “nuclear medium cooling” scenario with a relativistic-mean-field EoS with a -scaled hadron effective masses and coupling constants including hyperons.

neutron stars; equation of state; in-medium effects; hyperons; neutrino

I Introduction

Equation of state (EoS) of the cold hadronic matter should:

  • satisfy experimental information on properties of dilute nuclear matter;

  • empirical constraints on global characteristics of atomic nuclei;

  • constraints on the pressure of the nuclear mater from the description of particle transverse and elliptic flows and the production in heavy-ion collisions, cf. Danielewicz:2002pu (); Lynch:2009vc ();

  • allow for the heaviest known pulsars PSR J1614-2230 (of mass ) Fonseca:2016tux () and PSR J0348+0432 (of mass Antoniadis:2013pzd ();

  • allow for an adequate description of the compact star cooling Blaschke:2004vq (), most probably without direct Urca (DU) neutrino processes in the majority of the known pulsars detected in soft rays Klahn:2006ir ();

  • yield a mass-radius relation comparable with the empirical constraints including recent gravitation wave LIGO-Virgo detection TheLIGOScientific:2017qsa ();

  • being extended to non-zero temperature (for where is the critical temperature of the deconfinement), appropriately describe supernova explosions, proto-neutron stars, and heavy-ion collision data, etc.

The most difficult task is to satisfy simultaneously the heavy-ion-collision flow and the maximum neutron-star mass constraints. The fulfillment of the flow constraints Danielewicz:2002pu (); Lynch:2009vc () requires a rather soft EoS of isospin-symmetric matter (ISM), whereas the EoS of the beta-equilibrium matter (BEM) should be stiff in order to predict the maximum mass of a neutron star to be higher than the measured mass  Antoniadis:2013pzd () of the pulsar PSR J0348+0432, being the heaviest among the known pulsars.

Ii Equation of state and pairing gaps

In standard RMF models hyperons and -isobars may appear in neutron-star cores already for , which results in a decrease of the maximum neutron-star mass below the observed limit. The problems were named the hyperon puzzle SchaffnerBielich:2008kb (); Djapo:2008au (). Within the RMF models with the field-dependent hadron effective masses and coupling constants the hyperon puzzle is resolved, see Maslov:2015msa (); Maslov:2015wba (). Here we use the MKVOR-based models from these works. Most of other constraints on the EoS including the flow constraints are also appropriately satisfied. In Fig 1 we demonstrate the neutron star mass as a function of the central density for the MKVOR model without hyperons and for the MKVORH model with includes hyperons, cf. Fig. 20 and 25 in Maslov:2015wba (). For MKVOR model the maximum neutron-star mass reaches and the DU reaction is allowed for . For MKVORH model the maximum neutron-star mass is . The DU reactions on hyperons , become allowed for . The DU reactions with participation of , and become allowed f or . However, the neutrino emissivity in these processes is not as high as for the standard DU processes on nucleons due to a smaller coupling for the hyperons. Below we use MKVOR and MKVORH EoSs for calculations of the cooling history of neutron stars.

Figure 1: Neutron star masses versus the central density for the MKVOR model without inclusion of hyperons and for the MKVORH model with included hyperons.

We adopt here all cooling inputs such as the neutrino emissivities, specific heat, crust properties, etc., from our earlier works performed on the basis of the HHJ equation of state (EoS) Blaschke:2004vq (); Grigorian:2005fn (); Blaschke:2011gc (), a stiffer HDD EoS Blaschke:2013vma () and even more stiffer DD2 and DD2vex EoSs Grigorian:2016leu () for the hadronic matter. These works exploit the nuclear medium cooling scenario where the most efficient processes are the medium modified Urca (MMU) processes, and , medium modified nucleon bremstrahlung (MNB) processes , , , and the pair-breaking-formation (PBF) processes and . The latter processes are allowed only in supefluid matter.

The results are rather insensitive to the value of the pairing gap since the neutron pairing does not spread in the interior region of the neutron star. We use the same values as we have used in our previous works. Within our scenario we continue to exploit tiny values of the pairing gap. For calculation of the proton pairing gaps we use the same models as in Grigorian:2016leu () but now we exploit EoS of the MKVORH model. The corresponding gaps are shown on the left panel of in Fig. 2.

Figure 2: Pairing gaps for protons (left panel) and hyperons (right panel) as functions of baryon density for the MKVORH EoS including hyperons. Proton gaps are evaluated using the same models as in Grigorian:2016leu () and the hyperon gaps are from TT00 (); TN06 ().

With the increase of the density in the MKVORH model the hyperons are the first to appear at the density , and then the hyperons appear at . We take the values of the gaps from the calculations TT00 (); TN06 (). The model TT1 uses the bare ND-soft model by the Nijmegen group for interaction and model TTGm uses results of G-matrix calculations by Lanskoy and Yamamoto LanskYam () at density . The other 3 models include three-nucleon forces TNI6u forces for several pairing potentials: ND-Soft, Ehime and FG-A. On the right panel we show the hyperon pairing gaps which we exploit in this work. are considered unpaired.

The quantity

(1)

in a dense neutron-star matter (for ) has a minimum for , where is the neutron Fermi momentum. For the minimum occurs for . The value has the meaning of the squared effective pion gap. Of key importance is that we use here the very same density dependence of the effective pion gap as in our previous works, e.g., see Fig. 2 of Grigorian:2016leu (). To be specific we assume a saturation of the pion softening for . We plot this pion gap in Fig.  3.

Figure 3: Density dependence of the effective pion gap squared used in the given work. We assume that the pion softening effect saturates above a critical density which value we vary from till

Iii Results

On the left panel in Figure 4 we show the cooling history of neutron stars calculated using the EoS of MKVOR model without inclusion of hyperons. The demonstrated calculations employ the proton gap following the EEHO model shown in Figure 2, and the solid curve in Figure 3 was used for the effective pion gap.

Figure 4: Redshifted surface temperature as a function of the neutron star age for various neutron star masses and choice of the EoS. Left panel: MKVOR model without the inclusion of hyperons. Right panel: MKVORH model with hyperons included with the gaps following from the TN-FGA parameter choice. Proton gaps for both calculations without and with hyperons are taken following EEHO model.

Hyperons are taken following the TN-FGA parameter choice. With the pion gaps given by the solid and dashed curves and with proton gaps following the EEHO, EEHOR, CCDK, CCYms, and T curves we also appropriately describe the cooling history of neutron stars within our scenario.

Iv Conclusion

Thus we have demonstrated that the presently known cooling data can be appropriately described within our nuclear medium cooling scenario, under the assumption that different sources have different masses.

Acknowledgements.
The research was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the state assignment, project No 3.6062.2017/BY. The work was also supported by Slovak grant VEGA-1/0469/15. We acknowledge as well the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No 17-12-01427.

References

  • (1) P. Danielewicz, R. Lacey and W. G. Lynch, Determination of the equation of state of dense matter, Science, 2002, 298, 1592, doi:10.1126/science.1078070
  • (2) W. G. Lynch, M. B. Tsang, Y. Zhang, P. Danielewicz, M. Famiano, Z. Li and A. W. Steiner, Probing the symmetry energy with heavy ions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2009, 62, 427, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2009.01.001
  • (3) E. Fonseca et al., The NANOGrav nine-year data set: mass and geometric measurements of binary millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J. 2016, 832, 167, doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/167
  • (4) J. Antoniadis et al., A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary, Science, 2013, 340, 448A, doi:10.1126/science.1233232
  • (5) D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian and D. N. Voskresensky, Cooling of neutron stars: hadronic model, Astron. Astrophys. 2004, 424, 979, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040404
  • (6) T. Klahn et al., “Constraints on the high-density nuclear equation of state from the phenomenology of compact stars and heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. 2006, C 74, 035802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.035802
  • (7) B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations], GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 161101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
  • (8) J. Schaffner-Bielich, Hypernuclear physics for neutron stars, Nucl. Phys. A 2008, 804, 309, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.01.005
  • (9) H. Djapo, B. J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, On the appearance of hyperons in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 2010, 81, 035803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.035803
  • (10) K. A. Maslov, E. E. Kolomeitsev and D. N. Voskresensky, Solution of the hyperon puzzle within a relativistic mean-field model, Phys. Lett. B 2015, 748, 369, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.032
  • (11) K. A. Maslov, E. E. Kolomeitsev and D. N. Voskresensky, Relativistic mean-field models with scaled hadron masses and couplings: hyperons and maximum neutron star mass, Nucl. Phys. A 2016, 950, 64, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.03.011
  • (12) H. Grigorian and D. N. Voskresensky, Medium effects in cooling of neutron stars and 3P(2) neutron gap, Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 444, 913, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052799
  • (13) D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, D. N. Voskresensky and F. Weber, On the cooling of the neutron star in Cassiopeia A, Phys. Rev. C 2012, 85, 022802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.022802
  • (14) D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian and D. N. Voskresensky, Nuclear medium cooling scenario in the light of new Cas A cooling data and the 2 pulsar mass measurements, Phys. Rev. C 2013, 88, 065805, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.065805
  • (15) H. Grigorian, D. N. Voskresensky and D. Blaschke, Influence of the stiffness of the equation of state and in-medium effects on the cooling of compact stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 2016, 52, 67, doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16067-4
  • (16) T. Takatsuka and R. Tamagaki, hyperon superfluidity in neutron star cores, Nucl. Phys. A 2000, 670, 222c, doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00104-4
  • (17) T. Takatsuka, S. Nishizaki, Y. Yamamoto, and R. Tamagaki, Occurrence of hyperon superfluidity in neutron star cores, Prog. Theor. Phys. 2006, 115, 355, doi.org/10.1143/PTP.115.355
  • (18) D.E. Lanskoy and Y. Yamamoto, Skyrme-Hartree-Fock treatment of and hypernuclei with -matrix motivated interactions, Phys. Rev. C 1997, 55, 2330, doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2330
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
137772
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description