Observational Evidence for Coronal Twisted Flux Rope

Observational Evidence for Coronal Twisted Flux Rope

Abstract

Multi-instrument data sets of NOAA AR10938 on Jan. 16, 2007, (e.g., Hinode, STEREO, GOES, MLSO and ISOON H) are utilized to study the fine structure and evolution of a magnetic loop system exhibiting multiple crossing threads, whose arrangement and individual shapes are very suggestive of individual field lines in a flux rope. The footpoints of the magnetic threads are closely rooted into pores and plage areas. A C-class flare recorded by GOES at approximately 2:35 UT near one of the footpoints of the multi-thread system (along with a wisp of loop material shown by EUV data) led to the brightening of the magnetic structure revealing its fine structure with several threads that indicate a high degree of linking (suggesting a left-handed helical pattern as shown by the filament structure formed later-on). EUV observations by Hinode/EIS of hot spectral lines at 2:46 UT show a complex structure of coronal loops. The same features were observed about 20 minutes later in X-ray images from Hinode/XRT and about 30 minutes further in EUV images of STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI with much better resolution. H and 304 Å images revealed the presence of several filament fibrils in the same area. They evolved a few hours later into a denser structure seemingly showing helical structure, which persistently lasted for several days forming a segment of a larger scale filament. The present observations provide an important indication for a flux robe as a precursor of a solar filament.

Sun: corona — Sun: UV radiation — Sun: X-rays, gamma rays — Sun: magnetic fields — Sun: activity — methods: data analysis

1 Introduction

Most solar atmospheric features with varying degrees of complexity (i.e., active regions, prominences, filaments, loops, etc.) are thought to be shaped by magnetic fields emerging from the solar interior due to the buoyancy instability (Parker, 1984). Complex topologies (twist, writhe, linking and shear) of emerging flux tubes are key ingredients for numerous theoretical studies of solar eruptions resulting from magnetic reconnection (prominences, filaments, flares; see Linton et al., 1998, 2001). In fact, highly twisted flux tubes store magnetic energy that is necessary for the heating and acceleration of the plasma in the erupting structures. X-ray observations have shown that the majority of the active regions leading to coronal mass ejections (CMEs) have an S-shaped structure (Canfield et al., 1999). Amari et al. (2000) studied the crucial role played by twisted flux tubes in the formation of topologically complex flux ropes and their evolution into solar eruptive phenomena, such as CMEs.

Simulations of flux emergence from the convective zone into the upper atmosphere showed that untwisted flux tubes suffer convective stresses leading to their fragmentation and impeding their emergence to the upper atmosphere (Schüssler, 1979; Longcope et al., 1996). It has been found that some degree of twist in rising flux tubes is needed to avoid the conversion of the tube into vortex pairs (Moreno-Insertis & Emonet, 1996). It has also been reported that the flux reaching the upper atmosphere depends on both the field strength at the bottom of the convective zone (simulation box) and the degree of twist of the rising flux tube (Martínez-Sykora et al., 2008).

Different mechanisms have been invoked to be at the origin of the twist of rising flux tubes: (1) Helical turbulent motions (Longcope et al., 1998); (2) Coriolis force (Fan & Gong, 2000); (3) Differential rotation (DeVore, 2000); (4) Helicity generation by the solar dynamo (Seehafer et al., 2003); (5) Turbulent diffusion of wrapped poloidal flux into the rising flux tube (Chatterjee et al., 2006).

Measurements of the magnetic field vector in sunspots have shown that the magnetic field has a preferential helicity sign in both hemispheres (negative in the north and positive in the south; see Seehafer, 1990; Pevtsov et al., 1995, 2001). Lites et al. (1995) studied the topology of the emerging flux tube in a -sunspot and found a rather simple structure at the start with increasing topological complexity. Leka et al. (1996) found that proper motions imply that flux bundles are twisted before they emerge.

In the last few decades particular attention was paid to coronal filaments and prominences, which can erupt into CMEs. At the chromospheric level, they are characterized by a channel of fibrils with the filament spine, if present, laying above. An EUV or X-ray arcade of loops forms a “transverse” dome relative to the filament spine with a cavity separating both structures (see Martin, 1998, for a review). Numerous studies were dedicated to characterize the formation and evolution of these structures. Resolving the fine structure of these structures is important to understand the mechanisms leading to their eruption and to constrain models. Li et al. (1998) studied fine structure of filaments through the interpretation of spectroscopic observations. They found evidence for the presence of two dynamically different threads with different thermodynamic properties. Pojoga et al. (1998) compared prominence spectra to models taking into account radiative transfer effect. They found different structures with different optic opacity along the line of sight. Although resolving observationally the fine structure of filaments and prominences proved to be difficult to achieve, Chae (2000) used EUV observations to study qualitatively the chirality of filaments through the crossing topology of bright and dark threads.

The active region NOAA AR10938 is the area of interest for the present study. On Jan. 16, 2007, it was located approximately at N02E30. Multi-instrument observations, mainly from the Hinode Kosugi et al. (2007) and the Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO: Kaiser et al., 2008) missions, are utilized to study the formation and evolution of a loop system that is highly suggestive of a flux rope.

2 Observations

The Hinode Extreme UV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS: Culhane et al., 2007) carried-out three raster sequences of AR10938 on Jan. 16, 2007, at 1:54 UT, 2:20 UT and 2:46 UT with a 1″ slit. The observations were acquired in a number of spectral lines whose formation temperatures span a range from to  MK.

The Hinode Solar Optical Telescope (SOT: Tsuneta et al., 2008) filtergram (hereafter SOT-FG) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT: Golub et al., 2007) were observing the active region jointly, within the same time intervals and with comparable temporal cadence, on Jan. 15-16, 2007. High-resolution LOS-magnetograms from SOT-FG are utilized to study the photospheric evolution of magnetic flux (emergence and dynamics). The data is recorded on Jan. 15, 2007, 10:57 - 15:51 UT and 22:18 UT until Jan. 16, 2007, 5:59 UT with a temporal cadence of approximately 1 minute. XRT observations (Al-poly filter: , with maximum around 6.9) along with STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI (Howard et al., 2008, hereafter EUVI) data provide a proxy of the topology of the different coronal loop systems.

EUVI-A was recording with a time cadence of 10 minutes in both 171 Å and 195 Å, while EUVI-B was observing hourly. Since these observations were recorded soon after the STEREO launch, the angular separation of the two satellites was very small and 3D reconstruction of the observed structures is not possible. Thus, we limit ourselves to EUVI-A observations. EUVI-A 304 Å images, which are taken with a lower time cadence, are also used to study cool counterpart structures in relation with X-ray and EUV ones.

Additional data from other instruments (GOES, SOHO/EIT, ISOON) are also utilized to acquire complementary informations on the activity level of AR10938. They are, however, not presented here.

3 Results

Fig. 1 displays a LOS-photospheric magnetogram from SOT-FG of AR10938. The triangles depict the footpoints’ locations of the different threads forming the magnetic structure suggesting the presence of the twisted coronal flux rope. The different threads are rooted in pores and plage areas at both ends. The middle panel shows a difference map of the unsigned flux. It is clear that significant changes occur in the regions near the loops’ footpoints. For instance, the large changes occur within the positive and negative polarity regions in the left-central area and toward the bottom-right corner of the map, respectively. Flux changes elsewhere in the map are not as important. This trend persisted for several hours. The bottom panel exhibits the temporal evolution of the magnetic flux. Similar variations are obtained for the areas where the important changes occurred. The flux fluctuations are indicative of changes in the magnetic field topology in particular in the areas where the threaded magnetic structure is rooted. Starting from 23:00 UT, an overall increase in the total flux (and also that of both polarities) is found until approximately 1:30 UT when a significant decrease coincided with increasing coronal activity.

GOES recorded 12 X-ray bursts that occurred in AR10938 between 14:00 UT Jan. 15, 2007, and 16:00 UT Jan. 16, 2007. The most prominent one (a C-class flare) occurred on Jan. 16 at approximately 2:35 UT. White light coronagraphs STEREO/SECCHI/COR1 & COR2 Howard et al. (2008) and SOHO/LASCO Brueckner et al. (1995) did not detect any CME material in relation with the C-class flare. On the other hand, EUVI images show a material wisp very likely in conjunction with the flare.

EIS raster sequence performed at 2:46 UT reveals enhanced emissions in hot lines (Fe xxiv 255.1 Å: ; Ca xvii 192.82 Å: ; Fe xvi 262.98 Å: ; and Fe xv 284.16 Å: ). These emissions show a relatively complex system of loops with NE-SW direction (footpoint locations are indicated in Fig. 1).

The X-ray data recorded simultaneously with the SOT-FG photospheric magnetograms shows rapidly evolving coronal loop structures. Top panels of Fig. 2 display snapshots illustrating the development of active region AR10938. The bottom panels show the same structures with enhanced contrast after application of a wavelet filtering as described by Stenborg & Cobelli (2003). Different loop systems are expanding rapidly in the corona with relatively simple topology, i.e. loops toward the bottom of the different panels of Fig. 2. However, the bright loop system within the white box in Fig. 2b is of particular interest. It had an apparent simpler topology shown by X-ray data recorded earlier (10:57 UT - 15:51 UT Jan. 15, 2007). The occurrence of the structure within the white box (Fig. 2b), that is extending from northeast (-585″,120″) into southwest (-515″,80″), preceded the brightening of several other loops (see Fig. 2c) forming a rather complex pattern. The features of the X-ray system compare relatively well to the ones observed in hot line emissions observed by EIS.

EUVI-A 171 Å (Fig. 3) and 195 Å images recorded roughly between 3:00 UT and 4:00 UT show the relatively cooler ( MK) counterpart of the loop system observed by EIS and XRT (see Fig. 2). The system developed rapidly within a time interval of about 30 minutes as shown by Figs. 3b-3d.

Fig. 3d shows the fully developed complex topology of the threaded system. A number of the new EUV loops do not correspond necessarily to the ones observed earlier as was the case of the X-rays with respect to the EIS ones. The topology of the different threads indicates a high degree of linking suggesting the presence of a twisted flux rope (see Fig. 3c-d). Fig. 3c displays bright loops seemingly with left-handed helical pattern as suggested by the presence of an inverse S-shaped filament (see Fig. 4e; Rust & Martin, 1994). The system evolved further as a number of loops dimmed and disappeared later. Other seemingly higher loop systems brightened later as shown by Fig. 3f. These show some similarities with X-ray loops that appeared earlier (see Fig. 2d).

The sequential appearances of the suggested flux rope in hot emission lines (e.g., Fe xxiv 225.1 Å, ), then in X-ray images (a few MK), and finally in EUV 171 Å and 195 Å images ( MK) show the gradual cooling of the magnetic structure and display details of its fine structure. A sheared arcade of loops is also seen seemingly crossing from above the indicated flux rope in 171 Å and 195 Å images (Fig. 3f). Similar arcade was also seen prior to the flare and the appearance of the magnetic thread system.

EUVI-A 304 Å images reveal the presence of fibrils along the path of the magnetic thread structure observed in EUV and X-ray data. These fibrils, also seen in H from Mauna Loa Solar Observatory and ISOON-Sac-Peak, were present several hours before the appearance of the multiple crossing thread system. These are probably part of a larger structure forming an inversed S-shape (see Fig. 4a-b) extending along the neutral line across AR10938. This is well developed north to the active region and is of filamentary nature within and south of the same active region. 304 Å data reveal a denser structure along the location of the indicated flux rope that formed few hours later with an apparent helical pattern (see Fig. 4d). The presence of the filament was more prominent the next few days, in particular on Jan. 18, 2007, (see Fig. 4e-f). We believe this is a segment of the larger filament structure. H images showed also the presence of prominence activity coinciding with the presence of the active region at the west limb on Jan. 24-26, 2007.

4 Conclusions and Discussion

Multi-instrument observations of the active region NOAA AR10938 on Jan. 16, 2007, provide evidence for a magnetic thread system with a complex, multiple crossing topology, which is highly suggestive of a flux rope. A C-class flare in the active region AR10938 led to the brightening of the magnetic structure showing its fine structure in an unprecedented manner. The fine structure of the magnetic system is best seen in XRT images at approximately 3:00 UT and with better contrast in EUVI-A 171 Å and 195 Å data at about 3:30 UT. It is very unlikely that the observed complex topology is the result of projection effects. XRT data suggests that the indicated flux rope was present prior to the flare and its appearance is the result of heating processes related to the flare eruption. This led to emissions in hot spectral lines observed by EIS, followed by a cooling phase through X-rays and EUV, and ultimately the gradual disappearance of the system.

H and 304 Å data reveal the presence of dark fibrils aligned along the suggested flux rope. These structures were present before the appearance of the magnetic thread system. The X-ray and EUV threads suggest a high degree of linking as shown by the formation of a segment of an inverse S-shaped filament in the same location later-on conveying a left-handed helical pattern for the loop system. We believe that the dark fibrils are part of a filament channel and the indicated flux rope is a segment of the filament. The latter runs along the neutral line across the active region. It is well developed north of AR10938 and of filamentary nature elsewhere. This is supported by the presence of a loop arcade presumably laying above the multi-thread system, which is necessary for the formation of filaments. 304 Å observations show a dark, denser structure that formed about 8 hours after the brightening of the suggested flux rope. This evolved further into a wider feature in the following days reflecting the formation of the filament which is also supported by the presence of prominences when the active region was near the solar limb.

The present study should be useful for constraining models of filament formation. The role of the magnetic field topology, in terms of twist and shear, is a matter of debate concerning the processes of the filament formation. An important aspect is how and when (with respect to the eruptive phase of filaments) the confinement of the magnetic fields occurs. Two types of models are proposed to address these questions. The first class is flux rope based models which assume a high degree of twist from the start of solar filaments’ formation (Rust & Kumar, 1994; Priest & Forbes, 1990; Low, 2001). The second class considers highly sheared arcades along magnetic inversion lines to be the base of the filament, where the helical structure of magnetic field occurs only during the eruptive phase for the latter type of models (Pneuman, 1983; van Ballegooijen & Martens, 1989, 1990; Antiochos et al., 1994). Although the present work is not meant to discriminate between the two classes of models, it indicates the presence of a flux rope prior to the filament formation. We believe that it favors the first class. The processes of the plasma condensation in the loop system leading to the filament formation remain unclear.

It is likely that the flux tube emerged twisted from the convection zone. Photospheric shear motions may also contribute to the twist of the flux tube. However, shear transfer during the flare, which led to the brightening of the thread system, may be more plausible. The shear within the non-eruptive flaring structure should remain within the system. The only plausible way for this to happen is to increase the topological complexity of neighboring magnetic structures. A more detailed study of the dynamics within the active region is needed and will be carried out in the future.

NSO is operated by the AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the NSF. Hinode is a Japanese mission developed and launched by ISAS/JAXA, with NAOJ as domestic partner and NASA and STFC (UK) as international partners. It is operated by these agencies in co-operation with ESA and NSC (Norway). The STEREO/SECCHI data used here are produced by an international consortium of the NRL (USA), LMSAL (USA), NASA GSFC (USA), RAL (UK), Univ. Birmingham (UK), MPS (Germany), CSL (Belgium), IOTA (France), and IAS (France). N.-E. R.’s work is supported by NASA grant NNH05AA12I.
Figure 1: Top: LOS-magnetogram from Hinode/SOT-FG. The triangles indicate the location of the footpoints of the twisted loops. Middle: difference map of the unsigned of magnetic flux between 3:10 UT and 3:00 UT Jan. 16, 2007. Bottom: changes in the total flux (solid line), negative polarity (; dashes) and positive polarity (; dot-dashes) as a function of time.
Figure 2: Top: Hinode/XRT snapshots of AR10938 showing the brightening of the conjectured flux rope within the white box after the C-class flare at 2:35 UT (GOES). Bottom: Same as above after contrast enhancement by wavelet filtering.
Figure 3: 171 Å images from EUVI-A on Jan. 16, 2007, illustrating the evolution of the EUV counterpart of the X-ray threads observed by Hinode/XRT. The EUV structures look similar to those observed in X-rays with, however, a time delay greater than 30 minutes in appearance.
Figure 4: (a) H from Mauna-Loa Solar Observatory. The filament along the neutral line of AR10938 is well developed north the active region and is of filamentary nature south of it. (b-f) 304 Å images from STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI-A illustrating the evolution of the filament segment corresponding to the thread system seen in EUV and X-rays.

Footnotes

  1. affiliation: Present address: The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723-6099, USA. E-mail: nour-eddine.raouafi@jhuapl.edu

References

  1. Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Mikic, Z., & Linker, J. 2000, ApJ, 529, L49
  2. Antiochos, S. K., Dahlburg, R. B., & Klimchuk, J. A. 1994, ApJ, 420, L41
  3. Brueckner, G. E., Howard, R. A., Koomen, M. J., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 357
  4. Canfield, R. C., Hudson, H. S., & McKenzie, D. E. 1999, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 627
  5. Chae, J. 2000, ApJ, 540, L115
  6. Chatterjee, P., Choudhuri, A. R., & Petrovay, K. 2006, A&A, 449, 781
  7. Culhane, J.L., Harra, L.K, James, A.M., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, pp. 19-61
  8. DeVore, C. R. 2000, ApJ, 539, 944
  9. Fan, Y., & Gong, D. 2000, Sol. Phys., 192, 141
  10. Golub, L., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 63
  11. Howard, R. A., et al. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 136, 67
  12. Kaiser, M. L., et al. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 136, 5
  13. Kosugi, T., Matsuzaki, K., Sakao, T., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 3
  14. Li, K., et al. 1998, IAU Colloquium 167, eds. D. Webb, D. Rust and B. Schmieder, pp.32-35
  15. Linton, M. G., et al. 1998, ApJ, 507, 404
  16. Linton, M. G., Dahlburg, R. B., & Antiochos, S. K. 2001, ApJ, 553, 905
  17. Leka, K., Canfield, R., McClymont, A., & van Driel Gesztelyi, L. 1996, ApJ, 462, 547
  18. Lites, B. W., et al. 1995, ApJ, 446, 887
  19. Longcope, D. W., Fischer, G. H., & Arendt, S. 1996, ApJ, 464, 999
  20. Longcope, D. W., Fisher, G. H., & Pevtsov, A. A. 1998, ApJ, 507, 417
  21. Low, B. C. 2001, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 25141
  22. Martin, S. F. 1998, Sol. Phys., 182, 107
  23. Martínez-Sykora, J., Hansteen, V., & Carlsson, M. 2008, ApJ, 679, 871
  24. Moreno-Insertis, F., & Emonet T. 1996, ApJ, 472, L53
  25. Parker, E. N. 1984, ApJ, 281, 839
  26. Pevtsov, A. A., Canfield, R, C., & Metcalf, T. R. 1995, ApJ, 440, L109
  27. Pevtsov, A. A., Canfield, R. C., & Latushko, S. M. 2001, ApJ, 549, L261
  28. Pneuman, G. W. 1983, Sol. Phys.,88, 219
  29. Pojoga, S., Nikoghossian, A. G., & Mouradian, Z. 1998, IAU Colloquium 167, eds. D. Webb, D. Rust and B. Schmieder, pp.59-62
  30. Priest, E. R., & Forbes, T. G. 1990, Sol. Phys., 126, 319
  31. Rust, D. M., & Kumar, A. 1994, Sol. Phys., 155, 69
  32. Rust, D. M., & Martin, S. F. 1994, in Solar Active Region Evolution: Comparing Models with Observations. Eds. K.S. Balasubramaniam & G.W. Simon. ASP Conf. Ser. 68, Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p.337
  33. Seehafer, N. 1990, Sol. Phys., 125, 219
  34. Seehafer, N., et al. 2003, Adv. Space Res., 32, 1819
  35. Stenborg, G., & Cobelli, P. J. 2003, A&A, 398, 1185
  36. Schüssler, M. 1979, A&A, 71, 79
  37. van Ballegooijen, A. A., & Martens, P. C. H. 1989, ApJ, 343, 971
  38. van Ballegooijen, A. A., & Martens, P. C. H. 1990, ApJ, 361, 283
  39. Tsuneta, S., Suematsu, Y., Ichimoto, K., et al. 2008, Sol. Phys., 249, 167
100778
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
Edit
-  
Unpublish
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel
0
Comments 0
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Add comment
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question