NuSTAR view of M 31

NuSTAR view of the central region of M 31


Our neighbouring large spiral galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy (M 31 or NGC 224), is an ideal target to study the X-ray source population of a nearby galaxy. NuSTAR observed the central region of M 31 in 2015 and allows studying the population of X-ray point sources at energies higher than 10 keV. Based on the source catalogue of the large XMM-Newton survey of M 31, we identified counterparts to the XMM-Newton sources in the NuSTAR data. The NuSTAR data only contain sources of a brightness comparable (or even brighter) than the selected sources that have been detected in XMM-Newton data. We investigate hardness ratios, spectra and long-term light curves of individual sources obtained from NuSTAR data. Based on our spectral studies we suggest four sources as possible X-ray binary candidates. The long-term light curves of seven sources that have been observed more than once show low (but significant) variability.

galaxies: individual: M 31 Ð X-rays: galaxies – X-rays: binaries

1 Introduction

With a distance of 780 kpc (1998AJ....115.1916H; 1998ApJ...503L.131S) and moderate Galactic foreground absorption (=7 cm 1992ApJS...79...77S), the Andromeda galaxy (M 31 or NGC 224), is an ideal target to study the X-ray source population of a neighbouring large spiral galaxy. M 31 has been observed with many different X-ray imaging satellites, including Einstein (1979ApJ...234L..45V; 1990ApJ...356..119C; 1991ApJ...382...82T), ROSAT (1993ApJ...410..615P; 1997A&A...317..328S; 2001A&A...373...63S), Chandra (2000ApJ...537L..23G; 2002ApJ...570..618D; 2002ApJ...578..114K; 2002ApJ...577..738K; 2004ApJ...610..247D; 2004ApJ...609..735W; 2007A&A...468...49V; 2013A&A...555A..65H), Swift (2008A&A...489..707V), and XMM-Newton (2001A&A...378..800O; 2010ApJ...717..739O; 2005A&A...434..483P; 2007A&A...465..375P; 2010A&A...523A..89H; 2011A&A...533A..52H; 2014A&A...563A...2H). Most of these observation focused on the central region of M 31. A large XMM-Newton survey, covering the entire D ellipse of M 31, has been presented by 2011A&A...534A..55S.

The X-ray source population of M 31 comprises supersoft sources (the X-ray counterparts of optical novae; e. g.  2014A&A...563A...2H, and references therein), supernova remnants (e. g.  2012A&A...544A.144S), and X-ray binaries. Regarding X-ray binaries, most sources have been classified based on correlations with lists of globular clusters, fewer through the detection of long-term variability (e. g.  2006ApJ...643..356W; 2006ApJ...645..277T; 2008A&A...480..599S; 2013A&A...555A..65H), and only a few sources through the detection of short-term variability features, characteristic for X-ray binaries (2003A&A...411..553B; 2005A&A...430L..45P). In 2011A&A...534A..55S 65% of the sources could have only been classified as “hard” sources, i. e. it is not possible to decide whether these sources are X-ray binaries or Crab-like supernova remnants in M 31 or AGN in the background. This confusion is partially caused by the fact that the averaged X-ray spectra of these sources at energies below 10 keV, the ones covered by the X-ray satellites mentioned above, are quite similar.

In this paper, we make use of archival NuSTAR data of M 31, that cover energies between 3 and 80 keV, and that allow us to study the X-ray emission of individual sources in M 31, to investigate the X-ray source population of M 31 in this energy range. 2016MNRAS.458.3633M investigated joint Swift and NuSTAR spectra of five globular cluster sources in M 31, and suggested that these sources are neutron star X-ray binaries. Our study, which comprises a bigger data sample, includes four of their sources.

# Obs. id. Date Exp. [s] Field
1 50026001002 2015-02-06 106386 M1
2 50026001004 2015-03-01 104295 M1
3 50111001002 2015-06-26 104123 A
4 50110001002 2015-07-25 52232 A
5 50110001004 2015-08-01 71376 A
6 50101001002 2015-09-13 98550 Bulge
Table 1: Details of NuSTAR observations included in this study
Scr. ID R.A. Dec. P L L Class Remark
[SPH11] arcsec erg/s erg/s
807 00 42 9.53 +41 17 44.6 1.81 3.54E+35 1.16E+34 GlC mita 140
823 00 42 12.17 +41 17 57.5 1.78 6.60E+35 1.16E+34 GlC Bo 078
829 00 42 13.17 +41 18 35.1 1.73 3.60E+36 2.90E+34 hard [SK98] 194
836 00 42 15.28 +41 18 0.9 2.24 5.85E+34 4.64E+33 hard
855 00 42 18.71 +41 14 01.0 1.73 2.44E+36 2.32E+34 GlC Bo 086
870 00 42 21.51 +41 16 00.3 1.74 1.33E+36 1.74E+34 hard
872 00 42 21.68 +41 14 18.2 1.82 2.90E+35 5.79E+33 GlC type I X-ray burst [PH2005]
876 00 42 22.51 +41 13 33.5 1.74 9.85E+35 1.16E+34 hard
877 00 42 23.00 +41 15 34.3 1.72 6.20E+36 2.90E+34 hard XRB in [PFH2005]
879 00 42 23.2 +41 14 6.5 1.79 2.06E+35 5.79E+33 hard
910 00 42 28.31 +41 09 59.9 1.75 1.20E+36 1.74E+34 XRB
911 00 42 28.37 +41 12 22.6 1.72 3.18E+36 2.32E+34 hard
922 00 42 31.16 +41 16 20.7 1.73 2.90E+36 2.32E+34 hard
930 00 42 32.21 +41 13 13.5 1.72 1.82E+36 1.74E+34 hard
940 00 42 33.93 +41 16 18.8 1.8 3.51E+35 5.79E+33 hard
966 00 42 38.61 +41 16 03.0 1.72 2.03E+37 5.21E+34 XRB Z-source LMXRB [BKO2003]
972 00 42 40.22 +41 18 44.9 1.8 2.86E+35 5.79E+33 hard
981 00 42 41.49 +41 15 24.2 1.88 2.92E+35 1.16E+34 GlC Bo 124
985 00 42 41.85 +41 16 35.8 1.74 4.03E+36 4.06E+34 XRB LMXRB, X-ray transient, BH candidate [WGC2006] [TPC2006]
990 00 42 42.18 +41 16 7.5 1.76 2.94E+36 5.79E+34 XRB X-ray transient, BH candidate [OBT2001] [TBP2001]
994 00 42 42.5 +41 15 51.7 1.75 8.63E+35 2.32E+34 hard
997 00 42 42.92 +41 15 41.7 1.94 2.45E+35 1.16E+34 hard
1005 00 42 43.82 +41 16 31.2 1.84 5.04E+35 1.16E+34 XRB recurrent X-ray transient
1010 00 42 44.48 + 41 16 8.4 1.79 6.20E+35 2.32E+34 XRB recurrent X-ray transient; nucleus
1015 00 42 45 +41 16 19.6 1.85 7.30E+35 1.74E+34 hard WSTB 37W 135
1024 00 42 47.16 +41 16 27.2 1.72 4.83E+36 2.90E+34 XRB
1036 00 42 48.50 +41 15 22.2 1.73 4.72E+36 2.90E+34 hard
1041 00 42 49.24 +41 18 16 1.84 2.16E+35 5.79E+33 hard
1059 00 42 52.44 +41 16 49.1 1.94 3.49E+35 1.74E+34 XRB X-ray transient
1060 00 42 52.50 +41 18 54.3 1.73 3.30E+36 2.32E+34 XRB superburst, NS LMXRB [K2002]
1075 00 42 54.98 +41 16 03.5 1.73 3.48E+36 2.32E+34 hard
1078 00 42 55.39 +41 18 35.7 1.79 3.34E+35 5.79E+33 hard
1084 00 42 56.89 +41 18 43.2 2.97 4.62E+35 4.64E+34 XRB X-ray transient
1091 00 42 58.01 +41 11 5.0 1.74 1.66E+36 1.74E+34 hard
1093 00 42 58.36 +41 15 29.6 1.83 2.57E+35 5.79E+33 hard
1102 00 42 59.65 +41 19 19.4 1.73 1.87E+36 1.74E+34 GlC Bo 143
1103 00 42 59.90 +41 16 05.9 1.73 1.92E+36 1.74E+34 GlC Bo 144
1116 00 43 03.08 +41 15 25.0 1.73 2.85E+36 2.32E+34 GlC Bo 146
1122 00 43 03.89 +41 18 05.4 1.73 1.44E+36 1.74E+34 GlC Bo 148
1124 00 43 4.27 +41 16 1.6 1.86 2.13E+35 5.79E+33 GlC
1136 00 43 7.1 +41 18 10.4 1.81 4.87E+35 1.74E+34 XRB
1157 00 43 10.66 +41 14 51.8 1.72 4.40E+36 2.90E+34 GlC Bo 153
1253 00 43 32.44 +41 10 41.3 1.75 1.45E+36 2.32E+34 hard
1257 00 43 33.9 + 41 14 6.5 4.51 3.70E+34 5.79E+33 hard
1267 00 43 37.30 +41 14 43.9 1.74 2.78E+36 2.90E+34 GlC Bo 185

values and classification taken from 2011A&A...534A..55S
WGC2006: 2006ApJ...637..479W, TPC2006: 2006ApJ...645..277T, PFH2005: 2005A&A...434..483P, PH2005: 2005A&A...430L..45P, BKO2003: 2003A&A...411..553B, K2002: 2002ApJ...578..114K, OBT2001: 2001A&A...378..800O, TBP2001: 2001ApJ...563L.119T, SK98: 1998AstL...24...69S, mita: 1993PhDT........41M, WSTB 37W: 1985A&AS...61..451W
: luminosity in the 0.2 – 4.5 keV band, assuming a distance to M 31 of 780 kpc
italic source IDs indicate sources for which we found NuSTAR counterparts

Table 2: List of sources included in this study
Scr. ID region 15″ region 30″
[SPH11] Sig Sig
Table 3: Count rate ratios and significance of sources included in this study
[SPH11] FPM obs. 1 obs. 2 obs. 3 obs. 4 obs. 5 obs. 6
823 A
855 A
870 A
876 A
877 A
910 A
911 A
922 A
930 A
966 A
972 A
1015 A
1024 A
1036 A
1060 A
1075 A
1091 A
1102 A
1103 A
1116 A
1122 A
1124 A
1157 A
1253 A
1267 A
Table 4: List of background subtracted NuSTAR FPMA/B source counts (in units of cts/s) from a source extraction region of 30″.

Figure 1: Images of the NuSTAR/FPMA data. Sources detected by XMM-Newton (2011A&A...534A..55S) for which we found a NuSTAR counterpart (see Sect. 2) are indicated by black circles. Nearby XMM-Newton sources, which do not have a NuSTAR counterpart according to our selection criteria are marked as dashed circles. For sources with NuSTAR counterpart where source regions of 30″overlap each other, we also indicate regions of 15″using dashed circles.

Figure 2: Images of the NuSTAR/FPMB data. See Fig. 1.

2 Observation and data analysis

Details on the observations used in this study are given in table 1. We analysed the NuSTAR data using the NuSTARDAS tools nupipeline and nuproducts. We loaded the cleaned images produced by nupipeline into ds9 and used the source catalogue of the deep XMM-Newton survey of M 31 (2011A&A...534A..55S) as a reference source list to select by eye possible NuSTAR candidates of the XMM-Newton sources. We also selected all sources from the XMM-Newton source catalogue identified or classified as X-ray binary, globular cluster or “hard” that are located so close to our selected NuSTAR candidates that extraction regions with a radius of 30″overlap each other. For all these sources (listed in Table 2) we extracted source counts from regions of 15″and 30″radius located at the known position of each source, and corresponding “background” counts from annulus regions with 20″25″and 45″54″, respectively. We then derived the ratio of the source to the background counts , and the significance of the count rate difference:


where and are the errors of the source and background count rates, respectively. We derived these values for individual FPMs, as well as averages for all FPMs that cover a source position (Table 3), where we excluded FPMs where the source is located so close to the edge of the field of view that any of the extraction regions is only partially covered.

Images of the NuSTAR/FPMA and B data, overlaid with source regions are shown in Figs. 1, 2. Sources [SPH11] 910, 911, 930, 972, 1091, 1157, and 1253 do not overlap with any other XMM-Newton source. Ignoring all “sources” where , sources [SPH11] 922, 1036, 1102, and 1267 do also not overlap with an other source. Regarding the remaining sources we included those sources in our study which have averaged significances bigger than three (including errors) for the small and big extraction regions.

For all selected sources (indicated by an italic source ID in the first column of Table 2) we extracted source photons from a circular region with a radius of 30″located at the known position of each source to derive X-ray spectra. For sources [SPH11] 855, 870, 876, 877, 1015, 1024, 1075, 1103, 1116, 1124 which overlap with at least on other source we also used the smaller radius of 15″. A circular background region with a radius of 30″located close to the source on the same detector and free of source photons was also extracted. Background subtracted source counts in the 3 – 78 keV band obtained with nuproducts are given in Table 4.

3 Results

Selecting the sources, we noticed that there are only perviously known sources, with a brightness comparable (or even brighter) than the selected sources, in the NuSTAR data. The source IDs used in this paper are from the XMM-Newton catalogue of 2011A&A...534A..55S.

3.1 Hardness ratio diagram

Figure 3: Hardness ratio diagram for all sources. To keep the plot less busy no error bars are shown. Error bars are given in the HR diagrams of individual sources (Fig. 4). Counterparts of globular clusters are marked with squares, those of X-ray binaries with triangles. Big symbols indicate identified sources, while small symbols indicate candidates (as given in Table 2). Hardness ratios of [SPH11] 1253 are marked with open circles. Different colours indicate different observations: obs. 1: magenta; obs. 2: cyan; obs. 3: blue; obs. 4: green; obs. 5: orange; obs. 6: red.

We used isis (V. 1.6.2; 2000ASPC..216..591H) to obtain estimates of the background subtracted source count rates from the NuSTAR energy spectra in band 1 (3 – 10 keV), band 2 (10 – 20 keV), and band 3 (20 – 78 keV) combining data of both focal plane instruments. We derived two hardness ratios (HR) and errors for each source in each observation using the following equations:


for i = 1, 2, where and denote count rates and corresponding errors in the energy band .

In the HR diagram (Fig. 3), sources that are already classified as X-ray binaries or globular cluster sources are located at HR1. For the 13 sources that were in the field of view of more than one observation, we show HR diagrams of each source in Fig. 4. From these diagrams we see that for all sources the hardness ratios obtained from different observations do agree within error bars. The four observations of [SPH11] 1253 give slightly higher HR1 values and the HR1 value of [SPH11] 930 is even higher. The location of [SPH11] 930 in the HR diagram in comparison with the location of sources classified as X-ray binaries suggests that the X-ray spectral properties of [SPH11] 930 differ from those classified as X-ray binary. Source [SPH11] 1122 shows the strongest evolution in HR1. In obs. 2, it shows the highest HR1 value, which is comparable to those of [SPH11] 1253. The results of a more detailed spectral study (see Sect. 3.2) confirm that [SPH11] 1122 is harder in obs. 2 than in any other observation. Another source with HR1 values close to those of [SPH11] 1253 is [SPH11] 972, which is also fainter than [SPH11] 1253. In the region where the classified X-ray binaries are located there are nine sources ([SPH11] 870, 876, 877, 911, 922, 1015, 1036, 1075, 1091) that have only be classified as “hard” in 2011A&A...534A..55S. Source [SPH11] 876 has the highest and [SPH11] 1075 the lowest HR1 value of these nine sources. Source [SPH11] 1015 has been covered by three observations, and sources [SPH11] 1036 and 1075 have been covered by four observations. The nine “hard” sources located at HR1 are possible X-ray binary candidates.

Figure 4: Hardness ratio diagrams of the 13 sources that were observed more than once. Different colours indicate different observations; different symbols indicate different source types (see Fig. 3).
Figure 4: continued
Figure 4: continued
src. obs. N C T [keV] N C T [keV] T [keV] N
823 6
60.15/58 61.02 /58 58.24/56
855 6
31.79/ 33 28.27/ 33 24.73/ 31
870 6
105.80/79 87.77/79 87.47/77
876 6
21.81/ 24 26.74/ 24 21.17/ 22
877 6
82.51/74 81.92/74 78.62/72
Table 5: Spectral parameters obtained by fitting the NuSTAR spectra. Luminosities in units of erg/s. This is a sample of the full table, which is available with the electronic version of the article.

3.2 Spectral properties

To investigate this possibility further, we fitted simultaneously the FPMA and FPMB energy spectra of each source within Xspec (V. 12.8.2; 1996ASPC..101...17A) in the 3 – 78 keV range, grouping the data to a minimum of 20 counts in each bin. We use the following three simple models, which have also been used in 2016MNRAS.458.3633M, to fit the data: powerlaw, diskbb (1984PASJ...36..741M), and comptt (1994ApJ...434..570T), including Galactic foreground absorption using TBabs (2000ApJ...542..914W). The obtained best fit parameters are given in Table 5, together with luminosities and errors, derived using the cflux model. Four spectra with the best fit models and residuals are shown in Fig. 5. We selected the brightest observations of [SPH11] 1075, 1157 (the brightest globular cluster source in our sample) and 1253, and the faintest observation of 1102 (the faintest globular cluster source in our sample). We find that most sources have a photon index above or close to two, similar to what has been found in 2016MNRAS.458.3633M. Exceptions are [SPH11] 930 with and [SPH11] 1253 with a photon index around 1.5. We can also confirm another result of 2016MNRAS.458.3633M, that for most observations the comptt model provides a statistically better fit than a power law.

For sources observed more than once we can investigate the evolution of the spectral parameters. For almost all observations the value of the cross-calibration constant is independent of the spectral model used. For most sources the normalisations of the power law and of the disk blackbody show a similar evolution, and the evolution of the photon index and inner disc temperature is anti-correlated. The photon index and inner disc temperature and radius are constant within errors. Exceptions are [SPH11]1122 (obs2/3) and [SPH11]1267 (obs4). In general, the seed temperature in the comptt model is lower than the disc temperature in the diskbb model and it shows a different evolution. While a disc temperature of keV is quite high compared to values obtained from Galactic X-ray binaries using multi-component spectral models, it is in agreement with the values reported in 2016MNRAS.458.3633M. Regarding correlations between spectral parameters and source flux, we do not find any overall correlation of any specific spectral parameter with flux. The evolution of the photon index with luminosity is shown in Fig. 6. Only [SPH11]1157 and 1267 are getting harder when they get brighter. For these two sources we also find that the disc temperature increases when they get brighter. [SPH11]1267 shows a decreasing radius with increasing flux, while the radius of [SPH11]1157 is constant.

Figure 5: Spectra of [SPH11]1075, 1102, 1157, and 1253. For each source the spectra with the best fit of each model and the residuals for each model are shown.
Figure 6: Correlation between photon index and source luminosity.

3.3 Long term light curves

For the 13 sources that were in the field of view of more than one observation, we prepared long term light curves. We derived the fluxes from the spectral fits adding the cflux component to each spectral model with all parameters fixed to their best fit value. Fluxes are derived in the 3 – 78 keV band and converted to luminosities assuming a distance of 780 kpc. The obtained light curves are show in Fig. 7. Following 2011A&A...534A..55S we determine the variability factor, the ratio of the maximum and minimum luminosity, , and the significance of the luminosity difference:


where and are the errors of the maximum and minimum luminosity (ignoring uncertainties on the distance), respectively. Apart from the brightest source ([SPH11]1253) the overall evolution of the luminosity with time is consistent between the different models. For [SPH11] 1015, 1024, 1060, 1102, 1103, 1122, 1124, 1157 and 1267 we observe an overall flux increase, while [SPH11] 1036 and 1253 show an overall decreasing flux. For [SPH11] 1102 and 1122 there are two observations (obs. 4, 5) where the flux deviates from the overall increase, as it is lower in these two observations. For [SPH11] 1103 and 1157 the flux in the first two observations is lower than in the remaining observations. However, the variability factor is rather low. For most sources the variability factor is about 1 – 2, and it is below 5 for all sources. For most sources the significance of variability is , only [SPH11] 1157 has . For [SPH11] 1015, 1024, 1075, 1103, 1116, and 1124 we also show luminosities derived from source extraction regions of 15″. For most observations the overall evolution of the luminosity does not depend on the size of the extraction region. An exception is [SPH11] 1124 where the evolution of the luminosity in the last four observations does not agree with each other. For most observations the luminosities derived from the 15″ regions are lower than those derived from the 30″ regions. In case the evolution of the luminosities does not depend on the size of the extraction region, the lower luminosities from the 15″ regions imply that we miss source flux using these extraction regions, while the bigger extraction regions are still dominated by the source flux and contribution from nearby sources does not seem to affect the fluxes obtained.

Figure 7: Long term light curves of the 13 sources that were observed more than once, derived form the fits of the energy spectra. Luminosities obtained from the power law fit are given as red filled dots, those from the disk blackbody fit as green open squares, and those form the Comptonization model as blue open triangles. The ratio of the maximum and minimum luminosity (Var) and the significance of the luminosity difference (Sig) are given for each spectral model (power law, disk blackbody, Comptonization model). For [SPH11] 1015, 1024, 1075, 1103, 1116, and 1124 we also show luminosities derived from extraction regions of 15″ (power law: orange dots; disc blackbody: magenta squares; Comptonization model: cyan triangles).
Figure 7: continued
Figure 7: continued

4 Discussion

We analysed NuSTAR data of M 31 taken between February and September 2015. Comparing with the XMM-Newton source list presented in 2011A&A...534A..55S we find that all sources visible in the NuSTAR data have already been seen with XMM-Newton, i. e. the NuSTAR data do not contain any transient source that was not active at the time of the XMM-Newton data analysed by 2011A&A...534A..55S. Investigating hardness ratios we find that most sources are located in a certain region of the hardness ratio diagram. More detailed spectral fitting confirms that most sources have similar spectral properties. This suggest that [SPH11] 922, 1015, 1036, 1075, which have only been classified as “hard” in 2011A&A...534A..55S are good candidates for being X-ray binaries, as their spectral properties are quite similar to the ones of the identified X-ray binaries included in our source sample.

Sources [SPH11] 930 and [SPH11] 1253 are located at higher HR1 values than the identified X-ray binaries, and our more detailed spectral investigation confirms that these two sources have harder spectra than the identified X-ray binaries. There are several possibilities why the spectra of sources [SPH11] 930 and [SPH11] 1253 differ from those of the identified X-ray binaries. One possibility is that these two sources are background AGN, not belonging to the X-ray binary population of M 31. Another possibility is that these two sources are X-ray binaries observed in a (much) harder state than the identified X-ray binaries. 2013A&A...555A..65H suggest [SPH11] 930 to be an X-ray binary candidate based on the long-term variability observed in Chandra HRC-I observations. 2017ApJ...838...47Y reported the identification of a bright hard X-ray source dominating the M 31 bulge above 25 keV (the NuSTAR counterpart of [SPH11] 930), which is the counterpart to Swift J0042.6+4112, a possible X-ray pulsar with an intermediate-mass companion or a symbiotic X-ray binary. 2017ApJ...851L..27M reanalysed archival XMM-Newton observation of this source and discovered periodic dips. They suggest [SPH11] 930 to be a dipping low-mass X-ray binary seen at high inclination. 2016MNRAS.458.3633M argue that X-ray binaries associated with globular clusters in M 31 are most likely containing a neutron star primary. So the harder spectra of [SPH11] 1253 can indicate that this source is a black hole X-ray binary. A photon index of 1.5, as seen in [SPH11] 1253, can be observed in the low-hard state of a black hole X-ray binary (e. g.  2013MNRAS.429.2655S; 2016MNRAS.459.4038S). As [SPH11] 1253 is a field source the harder spectra of this source may indicate that it is a (neutron star) high-mass X-ray binary. However, it is not among the list of candidate high-mass X-ray binaries of 2009A&A...495..733S. The long-term XMM-Newton light curve of [SPH11] 1253 obtained from the 0.2 – 12 keV band flux given in the 3XMM-DR6 catalogue (2016A&A...590A...1R) is shown in Fig. 8. The light curve shows low (var = 1.79), but significant (sig: 8.62) variability. An interpretation as a supernova remnant is unlikely as the source shows significant variability and it is not included in the list of supernova remnants and candidates presented in 2012A&A...544A.144S.

Figure 8: Long term XMM-Newton light curve of [SPH11] 1253.


This project is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) through grants 103-2628-M-007-003-MY3, 104-281-M-007-060, 105-2112-M-007-033-MY2 and 105-2811-M-007-065. This research has made use of data obtained through the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center Online Service, provided by the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. This research has made use of data obtained from the 3XMM XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalogue compiled by the 10 institutes of the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre selected by ESA.


  1. pagerange: NuSTAR view of the central region of M 31Acknowledgments
  2. pubyear: 2018
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
Add comment
Loading ...
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test description