Nuclear Modification Factor of D^{0} Meson in Au+Au Collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV

Nuclear Modification Factor of Meson in Au+Au Collisions at = 200 GeV

Abstract

Heavy-flavor quarks are dominantly produced in initial hard scattering processes and experience the whole evolution of the system in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC energies. Thus they are suggested to be an excellent probe to the medium properties through their interaction with the medium. In this proceedings, we report our first measurement of production via topological reconstruction using STAR’s recently installed Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT). We also report our new measurement of Nuclear Modification Factor () of mesons in central Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV as a function of transverse momentum (). New results confirm the strong suppression at high with a much improved precision, and show that the at high are comparable with light hadrons () and with D meson measurements at the LHC. Furthermore, several theoretical calculations are compared to our data, and with charm diffusion coefficient 2 2-12 can reproduce both the and data in Au+Au collisions at RHIC.

keywords:
Quark-gluon plasma, Nuclear modification factor, Heavy Flavor Tracker
1

00 \journalnameNuclear Physics A \runauth \jidnupha \jnltitlelogoNuclear Physics A

\dochead\fntext

[col1] A list of members of the STAR Collaboration and acknowledgments can be found at the end of this issue.

1 Introduction

The mass of charm quark is significantly larger than those of light quarks, , and the QGP temperature at RHIC energies (). Therefore charm quarks are dominantly produced in the early stage of the collision in hard scattering processes at RHIC. They experience the whole evolution of the system and offer unique information for the study of hot and dense strongly-coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma (sQGP) matter.

Charm production has been systematically measured in () collisions in various experiments. Due to the large quark mass, charm production in collisions is expected to be calculable with a good precision in perturbative QCD. Figure 1 (left) shows the charm differential cross-section at midrapidity versus transverse momentum in collisions at GeV-7 TeV (1); (2); (3); (4). Experimental data are compared with Fixed-Order Next-to-Leading-Log (FONLL) pQCD calculations shown as grey bands (5). Within uncertainties, FONLL pQCD calculations describe the data over a broad range of collision energies. The precision of the experimental data allows to constrain the theoretical uncertainty in the pQCD calculations.

At RHIC energies, charm quarks are produced mostly via initial hard scatterings. This has been proved by charm total cross sections measured from different collision systems. Figure 1 right panel shows that, charm total cross section follows a number-of-binary-collision () scaling (1); (5); (6); (7); (9).

The modification of the charmed meson production is quantified with a Nuclear modification factor . is calculated as the ratio between the invariant yield in Au+Au collisions to the data scaled by . Our previous result shows that the as a function of is significantly different from unity (7).

STAR PreliminarySTAR Preliminary

Figure 1: (Left) Charm quark pair production cross section vs. at mid-rapidity in () collisions at GeV-7 TeV. FONLL pQCD calculations are shown as shaded bands (5). (Right) Charm cross section at mid-rapidity from to central Au+Au collisions from STAR.

2 Experiment and Analysis

The STAR experiment is a large-acceptance multi-purpose detector which covers full azimuth and pseudorapidity of . In this analysis, the data were taken by the STAR experiment using the newly installed Heavy Flavor Tracker (HFT) in the year 2014 RHIC run. The HFT is a high resolution silicon detector, which consists of three subsystems: two conventional strip detectors and one pixel detector using the state-of-the-art Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) technology (10). The HFT is designed to greatly improve open heavy flavor hadron measurements by the topological reconstruction of secondary decay vertices.

The data sample used in this analysis is 780M minimum bias events taken in Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV with the HFT. Events are required to have reconstructed collision position within 6 cm along the beam direction from the detector center. and are reconstructed in the hadronic channel, with a branching ratio of and a lifetime of m. Kaons and pions are identified via a combination of the energy loss dE/dx measured by the Time Projection Chamber and measured by the Time-Of-Flight detector (8). Secondary vertices are reconstructed as the middle point at the Distance of the Closest Approach (DCA) between the trajectories of two daughter particles. With the HFT, several topological cuts are used to greatly reduce the combinational background. Rectangular topological cuts are optimized in each bins using the Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis (TMVA) package for best significance of signal.

Figure 2 shows the invariant mass distributions in two bins. Compared with our former published result, the signal significance scaled to the same number of events has been improved by a factor of 4. The remaining combinatorial background is estimated with like-sign and mixed-event methods. The TPC efficiency is calculated by embedding simulated tracks into real event background. The HFT related and topology cut efficiencies are from decay simulation based on the HFT matching to TPC ratio and track pointing resolution directly from data. The results for 2 GeV/c are being finalized, and we show the results below for 2 GeV/c.

STAR PreliminarySTAR Preliminary

Figure 2: Invariant mass spectra of pairs for GeV/c (Left) and GeV/c (Right). The black points are unlike-sign pairs with the signal. The blue and red points show the like-sign and mixed-event background respectively.

3 Physics Results and Discussion

Although the total charm cross section follows scaling, the spectrum is significantly modified in Au+Au collisions (7). invariant yield (left) and nuclear modification factor (right) in the most central Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV are shown in Figure 3. The new invariant yields from the HFT (blue) are consistent with published data (red) with significantly improved precision (7).

STAR PreliminarySTAR Preliminary

Figure 3: meson invariant yields (Left) and nuclear modification factor (Right) in most central Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV. Also shown in the left panel are yields in collisions at = 200 GeV fitted with a Levy function. In the right panel, vertical bars on data points indicate statistical uncertainties, while the brackets are systematic uncertainties in Au+Au collisions. The grey bands are uncertainties from baseline. of D mesons from LHC and from RHIC are also shown. There are two vertical boxes around unity from left to right related to Au+Au and normalization uncertainties.

Figure 3 (right panel) shows the results from the most central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions. The new results from the HFT are consistent with the published ones in the measured range. Furthermore, they have highly improved precision in Au+Au collisions. The grey bands show uncertainties from the baseline from our previous measurement before the HFT installation (1), which is expected to be improved as well with the HFT data taken in the year 2015 RHIC run. The shows a strong suppression at high indicating strong charm medium interactions at this kinematic region. At the intermediate range (0.7-2 GeV/c), the data shows an enhancement which can be described by models including coalescence of charm and light quarks.

We compare our results with those of pions at RHIC (red squares) and D-mesons at LHC (blue triangles) (1); (7); (11); (12). As shown in Figure 3, at high is close to , which can be explained by taking into account the fact that charm energy loss is an interplay of elastic and radiative energy loss (14). The D-meson at GeV/c is also comparable between RHIC and LHC despite of a factor of 14 difference in collision energy.

Figure 4: meson (left) and (right) vs. in Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV comparing with various model calculations.

The left panel of Fig. 4 shows the results from the most central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions compared with various model calculations. The Duke model uses a Langevin simulation with an input diffusion coefficient parameter- 2, where is heavy quark spacial diffusion coefficient and T is medium temperature, which was tuned to the LHC D-meson data (13); (14). The TAMU calculation uses a non-perturbative approach and the full T-matrix calculation with internal energy potential, which predicts 2 to be 2-10 (14). The SUBATECH group uses the pQCD calculation with Hard Thermal Loop technique which indicates the 2 2-4 (14). These three models can describe our data points reasonable well. In the meantime, we also compare our first measurement of to model calculations (10). The TAMU and SUBATECH calculations can describe the measured as well, while the specific DUKE calculation with 2 seems to underestimate the . Our data favor models with finite charm flow. To further constrain our understanding of the medium diffusion coefficient, it will be beneficial to systematically study each ingredient in different model calculations.

4 Summary and Outlook

We report the first measurement of in the most central Au+Au collisions at = 200 GeV using the STAR newly installed HFT detector. New results confirm the strong suppression at high with a much improved precision. Theoretical models with charm diffusion coefficient 2 2-12 can reproduce simultaneously both the and data in Au+Au collisions at RHIC.

In year 2015, STAR has collected high statistics datasets with the HFT in and collisions at = 200 GeV. Analyses of these datasets will improve our baseline for the estimation and help understand cold nuclear matter effects. In addition, STAR has requested to collect 2 billion MB Au+Au events in the year 2016 run which will allow more precise determination of the sQGP transport properties.

Acknowledgement

We express gratitude to RNC group at LBNL and HEPG at USTC for their support. From USTC, the author is supported in part by the NSFC under Grant No. 11375172 and MOST under No. 2014CB845400.

References

Footnotes

  1. volume:

References

  1. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 072013 (2012).
  2. Z. Ye ,QM14 (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Rhys. A 931, 520 (2014).
  3. D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. L 91, 241804 (2003).
  4. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Jour. of High Energy Phys.01, 128 (2012).
  5. M. Cacciari et al., Phys. Rev. L 95, 122001 (2005).
  6. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. L 94, 62301 (2005).
  7. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. L 113, 142301 (2014).
  8. Ackermann et al. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499 624-632 (2003).
  9. R. Vogt , Eur.Phys. J.ST 155, 213 (2008).
  10. G. Contin, M. Lomnitz ,QM15 (STAR Collaboration)
  11. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 655, 104-113 (2007)
  12. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), arXiv:1509.06888 [nucl-ex]
  13. S. Cao et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 024907 (2015)
  14. A. Andronic et al., arXiv:1506.03981[nucl-ex]
Comments 0
Request Comment
You are adding the first comment!
How to quickly get a good reply:
  • Give credit where it’s due by listing out the positive aspects of a paper before getting into which changes should be made.
  • Be specific in your critique, and provide supporting evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements.
  • Your comment should inspire ideas to flow and help the author improves the paper.

The better we are at sharing our knowledge with each other, the faster we move forward.
""
The feedback must be of minimum 40 characters and the title a minimum of 5 characters
   
Add comment
Cancel
Loading ...
157867
This is a comment super asjknd jkasnjk adsnkj
Upvote
Downvote
""
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
The feedback must be of minumum 40 characters
Submit
Cancel

You are asking your first question!
How to quickly get a good answer:
  • Keep your question short and to the point
  • Check for grammar or spelling errors.
  • Phrase it like a question
Test
Test description