# Nonlinear macroscopic transport equations in many-body systems from microscopic exclusion processes.

###### Abstract

Describing particle transport at the macroscopic or mesoscopic level in non-ideal environments poses fundamental theoretical challenges in domains ranging from inter and intra-cellular transport in biology to diffusion in porous media. Yet, often the nature of the constraints coming from many-body interactions or reflecting a complex and confining environment are better understood and modeled at the microscopic level.

In this paper we investigate the subtle link between microscopic exclusion processes and the mean-field equations that ensue from them in the continuum limit. We derive a generalized nonlinear advection diffusion equation suitable for describing transport in a inhomogeneous medium in the presence of an external field. Furthermore, taking inspiration from a recently introduced exclusion process involving agents with non-zero size, we introduce a modified diffusion equation appropriate for describing transport in a non-ideal fluid of -dimensional hard spheres.

We consider applications of our equations to the problem of diffusion to an absorbing sphere in a non-ideal self-crowded fluid and to the problem of gravitational sedimentation. We show that our formalism allows one to recover known results. Moreover, we introduce the notions of point-like and extended crowding, which specify distinct routes for obtaining macroscopic transport equations from microscopic exclusion processes.

###### pacs:

02.50.Ey, 05.10.Gg, 05.60.Cd, 66.10.cg, 61.20.-p^{†}

^{†}: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.

Keywords: exclusion processes, transport equations, crowding, non-ideal fluids

## 1 Introduction

Diffusive transport is central in many areas of physics, chemistry, biology and soft matter Crank:uq []; Dhont1996 []; McGuffee:2010tg []; Caspi:2002zr []. However, while the mathematics of diffusive processes in dilute and simple media is fairly well developed and understood Crank:uq [], many interesting and relevant diffusive processes take place in strongly non-ideal conditions. These include a wealth of different highly dense media, from non-ideal plasmas kremp:216 [] to biological membranes Saffman01081975 [], media with complex topological structures, including porous media Talmon:2010bu []; Mitra:1992pt []; Whitaker:1967ta [] and living cells Dix:2008lp []; Phair:2000wa [] and strongly confining environments Condamin:2007ez []; Zhou:2004km []; Minton2000a []; Zimmerman1993 []; Kim:2009fk []; McGuffee:2010tg []; Ando:2010kl [].

Crowding and confinement effects on diffusion-influenced phenomena still pose fundamental yet unanswered questions. Concerning molecular mobility, for example, several computational and experimental indications exist of anomalous diffusion in the cell cytoplasm as a result of amount and type of crowding Balbo:2013ov []; Weiss:2004vn [], suggesting that living cells behave much like fractal or otherwise disordered systems ben-Avraham:2000kx []; Bouchaud:1990ys []. However, strong evidences also exist in favour of normal (Brownian) diffusion, crowding and confinement resulting in this scenario in (often nontrivial) modifications of the diffusion coefficient Dix:2008lp []; Novak2009758 []; Konopka01092006 []; Nicholson01121981 []. Another related issue is that of diffusion-limited reactions Smoluchowski:1916fk [], which are ubiquitous in many domains in biology and chemistry, touching upon problems such as association, folding and stability of proteins Zhou:2004oq []; Cheung2005 [] and bimolecular reactions in solution Dzubiella2005 []; Piazza2005 []; Fanelli:2010or []; Schmit2009 []; Tachiya2007 [], including enzyme kinetics Agrawal2008 [], but also the dynamics of active agents Ricci:1998fj []. Many theoretical studies have tackled these and related problems under different angles Agrawal2008 []; Cecconi:2007dg []; Dorsaz:2010zi []; Fanelli:2010or []; Felderhof:1976mw []; Kim:2009fk []; Zhou:2004oq []. Nevertheless, a full theoretical comprehension of transport in non-ideal media remains an elusive task, Fick’s law itself and the very notion of effective diffusion coefficient being questionable in a disordered medium Bouchaud:1990ys [].

In this paper we consider the subtle link between macroscopic transport equations, such as the diffusion equation, and microscopic processes, modeling the stochastic dynamics of some agents. The purpose of our study is two-fold. One the one hand, we wish to understand in greater depth the delicate procedure of obtaining mean-field transport equations from microscopic, agent-based stochastic models, paying special attention to what exactly is lost in going to the continuum. The idea is that sometimes it may prove simpler or more effective to describe a complex transport process (or a simple one occurring in a complex milieu) at the microscopic level. On the contrary, it is sometimes better to deal with macroscopic equations. It is thus important to investigate how the two levels of description interface with each other. On the other hand, as a result of our investigation, we will derive new macroscopic equations that provide useful analytical tools for exploring particle transport in non-ideal fluids in complex environments.

The paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we discuss the general framework of simple exclusion processes (SEPs), which constitute the basic tool of our microscopic description, as well as the process of obtaining mean-field equations from SEPs. In section 3, we move a step forward and consider microscopic exclusion processes involving agents characterized by a finite size, as opposed to standard SEPs. We introduce in particular the notions of point-like and extended crowding and discuss the formalism with reference to the problem of gravitational sedimentation.

We then go on in section 4 to propose, based on a simple analogy, a modified diffusion equation appropriate for describing transport in non-ideal fluids of -dimensional hard spheres at high densities. The obtained equation allows one to recover a known result for the basic problem of particle flux at a spherical absorbing boundary in self-crowding media. Finally, a summary of the main results obtained in this paper is drawn in the last section.

## 2 From microscopic processes to macroscopic equations

Simple exclusion processes are space-discrete, agent-based stochastic processes modeling some kind of transport according to specific rules and bound to the constraint that no two agents can ever occupy the same site. SEPs occupy a central role in non-equilibrium statistical physics Privman:1997kl []; Liggett:1999fk []. While the first theoretical ideas underlying such processes can be traced back to Boltzmann’s works Boltzmann:1966fk [], SEPs were introduced and widely studied in the 70s as simplified models of one-dimensional transport for phenomena like hopping conductivity Richards:1977tg [] and kinetics of biopolymerization [5]. Along the same lines, the asymmetric exclusion process (ASEP), originally introduced by Spitzer Spitzer:1970qo [], has become a paradigm in non-equilibrium statistical physics Derrida:1993bh []; Schutz:1993ye []; Derrida:1998oq [] and has now found many applications, such as the study of molecular motors Golubeva:2012qf [], transport through nano-channels Zilman:2010cr [] and depolymerization of microtubules Reese:2011nx [].

The most general SEP in one dimension is described by a stochastic jump process on a 1 lattice with inequivalent sites in the presence of a field

(1) | |||||

Eq. (1) is to be regarded as the update rule for a Monte Carlo process, where is the occupancy of site at time , which can be either zero or one. The quantities are variables which have the value or according to a random number which has a uniform distribution between and . By defining the jump probabilities () one can formally write:

(2) |

where stands for the Heaviside step function and where we are assuming that . Note that the ordering of appearance of the in the above expressions is arbitrary. Equations (2) entail that , where indicates an average over many values of , for a given configuration . The above process is fully determined by the fields , specifying the probability of jumping from site to site () or to site () in a time interval .

A (discrete-time) master equation for the above SEP can be obtained by averaging over many Monte Carlo cycles performed according to rule (1)

(3) | |||||

where we have defined the one-body and two-body site occupancy probabilities

(4a) | |||

(4b) |

Here denotes averages performed over many independent Monte Carlo cycles performed until time starting from the same initial condition. We emphasize that the same equation has been derived through a slightly different procedure by Richards in 1977 Richards:1977tg [].

### 2.1 Mean-field equations

With the aim of deriving macroscopic transport equations from the microscopic stochastic process described by eqs. (1), it is customary to assume a mean-field (MF) factorization,

(4e) |

With the help of eq. (4e), the master equation (3) becomes

(4f) | |||||

Nonlinear mean-field equations for exclusion process of this type have been used since the 70s to investigate one-dimensional transport in solids Huber:1977hc [].

Let be the lattice spacing and let us define a reversal probability , such that

(4g) |

The condition (4g) (with ) amounts to considering a field introducing a bias in the positive direction. In order to take the continuum limit , we must require

(4ha) | |||

(4hb) |

Eq. (4ha) defines the position-dependent diffusion coefficient, while eq. (4hb) defines the field-induced drift velocity. Note that we are assuming that the reversal probability vanishes linearly with .

With the help of eqs. (4g), (4ha) and (4hb) it is not difficult to see that in the continuum limit eq. (4f) yield

(4hi) |

where we have explicitly highlighted the fact that both the diffusion coefficient and the drift velocity are position-dependent quantities.

Eq. (4hi) is a nonlinear advection-diffusion equation, appropriate for describing the continuum limit of a microscopic exclusion process occurring on a lattice of inequivalent sites in the presence of a field. Although it represents the mean-field approximation of a known master equation, we are not aware of any authors stating it in its most general form. It is interesting to note that in the case of equivalent sites, which translates to a constant diffusion coefficient, the diffusive part of eq. (4hi) becomes linear, i.e. the microscopic exclusion rule is lost in the diffusive part. In the case of zero field, one then simply recovers the ordinary diffusion equation which, as it is widely known, can be derived from a microscopic jump process with no exclusion rules. This curious observation has been first reported by Huber Huber:1977hc []. If both the diffusion coefficient and the drift velocity are constant, eq. (4hi) reduces to

(4hj) |

an equation already obtained recently in Ref. Simpson:2009ys [].

Eq. (4hi) contains the single-particle probability field , which is a number between zero and one. The value should correspond to the maximum density allowed in the system. Thus, a more physical equation can be obtained by introducing the agent density

(4hk) |

where

(4hl) |

is the volume of a -dimensional sphere ^{1}^{1}1We emphasize that we use the general terminology of -dimensional
hard spheres. Obviously, these are hard rods in one dimension and hard disks in two.
of radius and is the maximum packing fraction for systems of
-dimensional hard spheres, (), ()
and () Torquato:2002kx [].
With these definitions, and using a more general vector notation, eq. (4hi) becomes

(4hm) |

This is the first important result of this paper.

## 3 Point like versus extended crowding in one dimension

The MF diffusion-advection equation (4hi) has been derived from a master equation containing terms of the type in the limit of vanishing lattice spacing. This amounts to considering agents of vanishing size in the continuum limit. We term this peculiar situation in the macroscopic world point-like crowding. However, one may argue that considerable microscopic information is lost in going to the continuum limit with point-like agents. Incidentally, this has to be the reason why the mean-field approximation does lose all the memory of the microscopic exclusion constraint and the diffusion equation is recovered for equivalent sites in the absence of a field.

Interestingly, a generalized exclusion process for agents of extended size in one dimension (hard rods) can be found in the literature, termed the -ASEP Schonherr:2004zr []. The authors derive a mean-field equation, which, in the absence of a field and for equivalent sites, reads

(4hn) |

where is the length of the rods. The nonlinear diffusion equation (4hn) is most interesting for a number of reasons. First of all, even if it has been derived through an ingenious but complicate change of variables based on a quantitative mapping between the -ASEP and the zero-range process Schonherr:2004zr [], it turns out that it can be regarded as the local-density approximation (LDA) of a simple general property of one-dimensional exclusion processes. As pointed out in 1967 by Lebowitz and Percus Lebowitz:1967uq [] concerning bulk properties

[] For many purposes, however, adding a finite diameter does not introduce any new complications; it merely requires the replacement in certain expressions of the actual volume per particle by the reduced volume , i.e. .

Remarkably, by performing the above substitution in Fick’s law, under the local density approximation, , one recovers eq. (4hn). Extending the terminology of the -ASEP Schonherr:2004zr [], we term this scenario extended-size crowding. Point-like crowding in the mean field approximation corresponds to systems of fully penetrable spheres, while extended-size crowding yields a transport equation suitable for systems of totally impenetrable (hard) spheres.

It is possible to substantiate and further illustrate the above considerations by showing that the
transport equations for point-like and extended-size crowding for homogenous systems
in a gravitational field allow to recover the appropriate equations of state (EOS) for
fully penetrable spheres (FPSs) and totally impenetrable (i.e. hard) spheres (TISs), respectively.
Let us consider sedimentation in one dimension.
Let and indicate the particle and solvent material
densities ^{2}^{2}2For the sake of clarity, we indicate with mass densities and with
number densities, measured in number of particles per unit volume.,
respectively, and the buoyant mass
of the particles. The appropriate equation for point-like crowding
bears in the case of non-zero field the signature of the microscopic exclusion process.
Recalling that in one dimension and thus
(see eq. (4hk)), eq. (4hm) reduces to

(4ho) |

Here is the so-called sedimentation (or gravitational) length and we have taken an upward pointing -axis. Eq. (4ho) can be solved by noting that at equilibrium the osmotic current is exactly balanced by the gravitational one, thus , which gives

(4hp) |

The constant is to be determined by imposing the boundary conditions. Usually, this is done by introducing the bulk density , such that

(4hq) |

where is the height of the initially homogenous suspension. This gives

(4hr) |

For one has that the density at the bottom is exponentially close to the maximum density

(4hs) |

In practice, particle settling leaves only supernatant solvent at the top of the cell. Hence we can safely take , which shows that the fluid attains maximum packing at the bottom of the cell.

The nice thing about this exercise is that we can derive an equation of state (EOS) from the sedimentation profile. In fact, the osmotic pressure in the suspension is given by

(4ht) |

where, accordingly to the above considerations, we have taken the upper integration limit as . It is a straightforward calculation to show that the general expression (4hp) yields, independently of the chosen boundary conditions,

(4hu) |

The EOS (4hu) has a straightforward physical interpretation. In a system of fully penetrable spheres with reduced density , the volume fraction occupied by the particles is given by Torquato:2002kx []. Hence, the modified EOS (4hu) can be obtained from the perfect gas EOS by replacing the reduced density with its expression containing the actual volume fraction. This unveils the meaning of the above modified EOS, featuring the true volume fraction in the right-hand side. At the same time, this also illustrates the notion of point-like crowding.

Summarizing, a point-like microscopic exclusion process such as (4f) yields a macroscopic transport equation that describes a fluid of fully penetrable spheres. Therefore, extending this line of reasoning to what we have dubbed the extended-crowding scenario, we expect that the -ASEP mean-field equation in non-zero field Schonherr:2004zr [] would yield the EOS of a system of hard rods, also known as the Tonk gas Tonks:1936mb []

(4hv) |

We shall now prove that this is indeed the case. Inserting the Tonk gas EOS (4hv) in eq. (4ht) and differentiating with respect to , one gets

(4hw) |

the known LDA equation for sedimentation of hard rods Biben:1993bg []. However, the above equation also equals the condition that the total -ASEP particle flux vanishes at equilibrium. Indeed, the stationary mean-field equation corresponding to the -ASEP reads Schonherr:2004zr []

(4hx) |

which leads to the same expression for the total (constant) particle flux as eq. (4hw). Hence, the -ASEP yields a macroscopic transport equation that describes a gas of hard rods in the local density approximation.

The discussion above which leads to the concept of extended crowding applies to one dimensional systems. Starting from this setting, one can raise the question whether similar arguments might be employed to obtain a modified nonlinear equation accounting for excluded volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres in two and three dimensions. The following section is devoted to speculating further along this line of reasoning.

## 4 Excluded volume interactions of finite-size agents in higher dimensions.

In the preceding section we have shown that the point-like crowding scenario leads to the mean-field equation (4hm) from a standard simple exclusion process at the microscopic level. The extended-crowding generalization consists in endowing agents with a finite size (hard core). The ensuing exclusion process in one dimension has been termed in the literature the -ASEP Schonherr:2004zr [].

Fully penetrable spheres | 1 | 1 | 1 |
---|---|---|---|

Totally impenetrable spheres |

We have shown that the nonlinear transformation put forward by Lebowitz and Percus in 1967, under the local density approximation, allows one to recover the -ASEP mean-field transport equation (4hn) for the evolution of the density of extended rod-like agents in one dimension. Interestingly, it is possible to posit a generalization of such macroscopic transport equation adequate to the mean-field limit of exclusion processes involving extended objects in more than one dimension by borrowing general concepts in the theory of heterogenous media.

With reference to standard definitions of micro-structural descriptors in dimensions Torquato:2002kx [], we can identify the aforementioned substitution by Lebowitz and Percus as a mapping between certain statistical properties characterizing systems of fully penetrable spheres and totally impenetrable (i.e. hard) spheres. More precisely, let us introduce the so-called conditional pair distribution function (CPDF) . Let denote the distance from the center of some reference particle in a system with bulk density . Then, by definition equals the average number of particles in the shell of infinitesimal volume around the central particle, given that the volume of the -sphere of radius is empty of other particle centers. Here

(4hy) |

The CPDF for FPS and TIS systems are reported in Table (1),
where one can readily recognize the Lebowitz and Percus substitution as a mapping
between the FPS and TIS CPDFs in one dimension.
The coefficients appearing in the expressions of are given by the
following expressions ^{3}^{3}3These are the expressions appropriate to
the liquid phase below the freezing point,
i.e. for ( for and
for ). for Torquato:2002kx []

(4hza) | |||

(4hzb) |

while for one has

(4hzaaa) | |||

(4hzaab) | |||

(4hzaac) |

where is the packing fraction, being the diameter of a -dimensional sphere.

The above discussion suggests a way to generalize the -ASEP (4hn) to describe excluded-volume effects in more than one dimension in the mean-field approximation in a homogeneous medium and zero field. For a spherically symmetric problem we posit

(4hzaaab) |

where we have emphasized that depends explicitly on (for ). Eq. (4hzaaacaf) is the second main result of this paper. The coefficients appearing in the expressions for are given by eqs (4hza), (4hzb), (4hzaaa), (4hzaab) and (4hzaac) and it is understood that, according to the local density approximation, one should replace with , where is the volume of one hard -dimensional sphere, so that depends on both explicitly and implicitly through .

### 4.1 The Smoluchowski problem at finite densities

In order to provide some a posteriori justification for eq. (4hzaaab), it is instructive to consider how the classical problem of diffusion to an absorbing sphere is modified in a non-ideal fluid. Let us imagine a fixed sink of radius that absorbs hard spheres of radius and bulk density . The rate measuring the number of particles absorbed by the sink per unit time equals the total flux into the sink. For ordinary Fickian diffusion, one has the classical result , known as the Smoluchowski rate Smoluchowski:1916fk []. This result is indeed the prediction of a two-body problem, i.e. it amounts to considering the absorption of non-interacting, or equivalently fully penetrable, spheres. Thus, it describes the problem in the infinite dilution limit. Eq. (4hzaaab) can now be employed to repeat the same exercise for hard spheres at finite densities, that is, the Smoluchowski problem with excluded-volume interactions accounted for. One should then solve the following boundary-value problem

(4hzaaaca) | |||

(4hzaaacb) | |||

(4hzaaacc) |

The rate can be computed readily without really solving the (modified) Laplace equation. From (4hzaaaca), we have directly

(4hzaaacad) |

where we have defined , so that denotes the bulk packing fraction of the hard spheres. Integrating eq. (4hzaaacad) between and infinity and taking into account the boundary conditions (4hzaaacb) and (4hzaaacc), it is straightforward to obtain

(4hzaaacae) |

where . In three dimensions, one thus has , where one can recognize as the compressibility of the hard sphere fluid in the Carnahan-Starling approximation Carnahan:1969ys []. We see that eq. (4hzaaab) allows one to recover our previous result , obtained in two different ways, by assuming a density-dependent mobility in the diffusion equation Dorsaz:2010vn [] and from a transport equation derived in the local-density approximation Piazza:2013fk [].

## 5 Summary and discussion

In this paper we have discussed a general framework allowing to obtain macroscopic transport equation accounting for excluded volume effects in systems of -dimensional hard spheres starting from a microscopic stochastic exclusion processes. The aim of this procedure is to derive mean-field equations suitable for describing transport processes in many-body systems in highly non-ideal conditions. We have identified two strategies for doing so. The first route, termed point-like crowding, leads from a standard simple exclusion process to the mean-field equation (4hm). For a homogenous medium in the absence of a field this reduces to a simple diffusion equation, which is why we have dubbed this scenario point-like crowding. Only for inequivalent sites and/or in the presence of a field does the microscopic exclusion constraint survives in the mean-field limit. The second strategy, named extended-crowding, takes inspiration from a modified microscopic exclusion process in one dimension involving extended agents, the so-called -ASEP Schonherr:2004zr []. By extending an argument originally put forward by Lebowitz and Percus in 1967, coupled to a local density approximation, we have posited a modified nonlinear diffusion equation suitable for studying in an effective manner transport processes in dense systems of hard spheres, eq. (4hzaaacaf). We have shown that this equation allows one to recover recent results obtained for the problem of diffusion to an absorbing sphere in a self-crowded medium. Furthermore, we have brought to the fore an interesting structure underlying the two above strategies for obtaining macroscopic equations from microscopic stochastic processes. While extended crowding is indeed appropriate for diffusion of hard spheres, the continuum limit of point-like crowding exclusion processes is only appropriate for systems of fully penetrable spheres. Therefore, when one takes the continuum limit, all signatures of the microscopic exclusion constraints are lost in the diffusive part of the transport equation.

We note that eq. (4hzaaab) provides a sensible description of diffusion in a non-ideal fluid in the case where the problem has spherical symmetry. We may ask whether our line of reasoning may be extended to a problem with different or no symmetry. Guided by the observation that for a system of -dimensional hard spheres, we can speculate that a modified equation could be considered, involving the bulk CPDF in the local density approximation,

(4hzaaacaf) |

where again one should understand in the expression for the coefficients and . Some justification for the above idea can be gathered by recalling the known equation that one obtains by introducing a density-dependent mobility in the diffusion equation given by the derivative of the osmotic pressure with respect to the density Dhont1996 [], , namely

(4hzaaacag) |

where is the bare diffusion coefficient (corresponding to the infinite dilution limit) and is the compressibility factor. At zero order, where and eq. (4hzaaacaf) and eq. (4hzaaacag) are the same, as .

As a last observation, we see that, if we compare eq. (4hx) with eq. (4ho), the point-like route to a macroscopic mean-field equation for a homogenous medium bears the signature of the microscopic exclusion mechanism in the advection term. On the contrary, at least in one dimension, the extended-crowding procedure yields a modified diffusion term, while the term associated with the external field current is left unchanged. The profound meaning of this fact appears still elusive, but it would be certainly interesting to dig further.

The authors would like to thank L. E. L. Kann and G. Foffi for a critical reading of the manuscript and enlightening discussions.

## References

- [1] Crank J 1975 The mathematics of diffusion (New York: Oxford University Press)
- [2] Dhont J 1996 An introduction to dynamics of colloids (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
- [3] McGuffee S R and Elcock A H 2010 PLoS Comput Biol 6 e1000694 EP –
- [4] Caspi A, Granek R and Elbaum M 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66(1) 011916
- [5] Kremp D, Schlanges M, Bonitz M and Bornath T 1993 Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 5 216–229
- [6] Saffman P G and Delbrück M 1975 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 72 3111–3113
- [7] Talmon Y, Shtirberg L, Harneit W, Rogozhnikova O Y, Tormyshev V and Blank A 2010 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12(23) 5998–6007
- [8] Mitra P P, Sen P N, Schwartz L M and Le Doussal P 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(24) 3555–3558
- [9] Whitaker S 1967 AIChE Journal 13 420–427
- [10] Dix J A and Verkman A 2008 Annual Review of Biophysics 37 247–263
- [11] Phair R D and Misteli T 2000 Nature 404 604–609
- [12] Condamin S, Benichou O, Tejedor V, Voituriez R and Klafter J 2007 Nature 450 77–80
- [13] Zhou H X 2004 Journal of Molecular Recognition 17 368–375
- [14] Minton A P 2000 Curr Opin Struct Biol 10 34–39
- [15] Zimmerman S B and Minton A P 1993 Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 22 27–65
- [16] Kim J S and Yethiraj A 2009 Biophysical journal 96 1333–1340
- [17] Ando T and Skolnick J 2010 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 18457–18462
- [18] Balbo J, Mereghetti P, Herten D P and Wade R C 2013 Biophysical Journal 104 1576 – 1584
- [19] Weiss M, Elsner M, Kartberg F and Nilsson T 2004 Biophysical journal 87 3518–3524
- [20] ben Avraham D and Havlin S 2000 Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems (Cambridge University Press)
- [21] Bouchaud J P and Georges A 1990 Physics Reports 195 127–293
- [22] Novak I L, Kraikivski P and Slepchenko B M 2009 Biophysical Journal 97 758 – 767
- [23] Konopka M C, Shkel I A, Cayley S, Record M T and Weisshaar J C 2006 Journal of Bacteriology 188 6115–6123
- [24] Nicholson C and Phillips J M 1981 The Journal of Physiology 321 225–257
- [25] von Smoluchowski M 1916 Physik Z 17 557–571
- [26] Zhou H X 2004 Journal of Molecular Recognition 17 368–375
- [27] Cheung M S, Klimov D and Thirumalai D 2005 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 4753–4758
- [28] Dzubiella J and McCammon J A 2005 The Journal of Chemical Physics 122 184902 (pages 7)
- [29] Piazza F, De Los Rios P, Fanelli D, Bongini L and Skoglund U 2005 European Biophysics Journal 34 899–911
- [30] Fanelli D and McKane A J 2010 Physical Review E 82 021113
- [31] Schmit J D, Kamber E and Kondev J 2009 Physical Review Letters 102 218302
- [32] Tachiya M and Traytak S D 2007 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 19 065111
- [33] Agrawal M, Santra S B, Anand R and Swaminathan R 2008 PRAMANA - Journal of Physics 71 359–368
- [34] Ricci N, Barbanera F and Erra F 1998 The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 45 606–611
- [35] Cecconi F, De Los Rios P and Piazza F 2007 Journal of Physical Chemistry B 111 11057–11063
- [36] Dorsaz N, De Michele C, Piazza F and Foffi G 2010 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22
- [37] Felderhof B U and Deutch J M 1976 Journal of Chemical Physics 64 4551–4558
- [38] Privman V (ed) 1997 Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension (Cambridge University Press.)
- [39] Liggett T M 1999 Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
- [40] Boltzmann L 1896 Vorlesungen über Gastheorie (Lectures on Gas Theory) vol I and II (Berkeley: University of California Press. Translated by S. G. Brush, 1966)
- [41] Richards P M 1977 Physical Review B 16 1393–1409
- [42] Spitzer F 1970 Advances in Mathematics 5 246–290
- [43] Derrida B, Evans M R, Hakim V and Pasquier V 1993 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26 1493
- [44] Schütz G and Domany E 1993 Journal of Statistical Physics 72 277–296
- [45] Derrida B 1998 Physics Reports 301 65–83
- [46] Golubeva N and Imparato A 2012 Physical Review Letters 109 190602
- [47] Zilman A and Bel G 2010 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22 454130
- [48] Reese L, Melbinger A and Frey E 2011 Biophysical journal 101 2190–2200
- [49] Huber D L 1977 Physical Review B 15 533–538
- [50] Simpson M J, Landman K A and Hughes B D 2009 Physical Review E 79 031920–
- [51] Torquato S 2002 Random Heterogenous Materials Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics (New York: Springer-Verlag)
- [52] Schönherr G and Schütz G M 2004 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37 8215
- [53] Lebowitz J L and Percus J K 1967 Physical Review 155 122–138
- [54] Tonks L 1936 Physical Review 50 955–963
- [55] Biben T, Hansen J P and Barrat J L 1993 The Journal of Chemical Physics 98 7330–7344
- [56] Carnahan N and Starling K 1969 J. Chem. Phys. 51 635–636
- [57] Dorsaz N, De Michele C, Piazza F, De Los Rios P and Foffi G 2010 Physical Review Letters 105 120601–
- [58] Piazza F, Foffi G, De Michele C and De Los Rios P 2013 submitted to: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter